
    Cipriano RAMIREZ-PASCUAL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-71817.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.
    
    Filed Dec. 12, 2006.
    Jorge I. Rodriguez-Choi, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Cipriano Ramirez-Paseual, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his asylum application. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, see Lim v. INS, 224 F.3d 929, 933 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition for review.

Ramirez-Pascual testified that because the guerillas signed the 1996 peace accords, he no longer feared returning to Guatemala. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Ramirez-Pascual did not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Montecino v. INS, 915 F.2d 518, 520-21 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that a well-founded fear must be subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     