
    Wesley B. Porch v. Agnew Company.
    [Submitted March 27th, 1906.
    Decided November 19th, 1906.]
    On appeal of Clarence M. Busch, from orders adjudicating certain claims against the defendant, an insolvent corporation, advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey, whose opinion is reported in 7'0 N. J. Eq. -828.
    
    
      Mr. George A. Bourgeois, for Millegan & Weber.
    
      Mr. William M. Clevenger, for the Du Parquet Company.
    
      Messrs. Thompson & Cole, for C. M. Busch.
   Per Curiam.

The orders of the court of chancery appealed from are affirmed, with the remark that the observations of the learned vice-chancellor respecting the influence of sections 15 and 28 of the Mechanics’ Lien act (P. L. 1\898 p. 550) upon the relative priority of the mechanics’ lien of the Du Parquet & Mense Company and the mortgage of C. M. Busch were not necessary to a decision of the question involved.

Hpon the soundness of these observations opinion is expressed.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson,- Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vre- . DENBURGH, VbOOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL—14.

For reversal—None.  