
    21603.
    Harris v. The State.
    Decided September 4, 1931.
    
      B. F. Wallcer, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. Under all the particular facts of the case this court can not hold as a matter of law that the trial judge abused his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

'Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.  