
    Before the Second Division,
    August 18, 1966
    No. P66/193.
    Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Roberts, Reilly & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/14548, etc. (New York).
   Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof, which parts are dedicated to use on or for said bag-making machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.  