
    Sugarman v. The State.
    No. 3105.
    Decided April 29, 1914.
    Aggravated Assault—Name of Defendant.
    Where the information alleged that the Christian name of defendant was unknown, and he did not suggest what his name really was, and no motion in regard thereto was made, there was nothing to review, in the absence of a statement of facts or motion for new trial.
    Appeal from the County Court of Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Davis.
    Appeal from a conviction of aggravated assault; penalty, a fine of $25.
    The opinion states the case.
    Ho brief on file for appellant.
    
      C. E. Lane, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   HABPEB, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.

The complaint and information allege that" the Christian name of appellant was unknown. When tried he did not suggest what his name really was, and no motion in regard thereto was made. Ho statement of facts accompanies the record; neither does it contain any motion for a new trial, nor any order on such motion if any was filed, the recognizance taken in the ease reciting that an appeal had been taken to this court. The complaint and information being sufficient, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.  