
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amado PEREZ-AVALOS, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 05-50221, 05-50252.
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Decided Dec. 14, 2005.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Nancy Gosnell Revelette, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Amado Perez-Avalos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. Perez-Avalos also appeals from the final order revoking a previously-imposed supervised release term but has identified no error with respect to that order. Because the only issue identified and argued by Perez-Avalos is foreclosed, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     