
    FINK et al., receivers, v. ASH, and vice versa.
    
    May 19, 1896. Argued at the last term.
   Simmons, C. J.

The evidence warranted the verdict, which was reasonable in amount, and if the court committed any error at all, it was not such as would require a new trial.

Judgment affirmed; cross-hill of exceptions dismissed.

Action for damages. Before Judge Harris. City court of Floyd county. March term, 1895.

McOutohm & Shumate and Hoskinson & Harris, for receivers. Dean cG Dean, contra.  