
    SEELY against MYRES.
    ON CERTIORARI.
    This was an action of debt, brought before the justice by Myres, against Seely, on the following state of demand:
    
      
      
    
    [*] The above note and money, I let the said Samuel G. Seely have in the spring of 1802.
    It was now contended that the state of demand does not contain sufficient legal certainty, and that an action of debt will not lie for a note of hand.
   By the Court.

— It would have been more correct to

have stated with more certainty, the purposes for which the note was delivered to the defendant below; but from the whole case stated it is to be collected that this is a charge for a note and money lent the defendant below.

tludgment affirmed.  