
    Carl Lee CALLEGARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve CAMBRA; et al., Defendants.
    No. 06-15687.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.
    
    Filed March 1, 2007.
    
      Carl Lee Callegari, Soledad, CA, pro se.
    Alvin Gittisriboongul, Attorney General’s Office for the State of California, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants.
    Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Carl Lee Callegari, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Sandra McDonald, the librarian at Salinas Valley State Prison, in his 42 USC § 1983 action alleging retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Buono v. Norton, 371 F.3d 543, 545 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Callegari failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether McDonald filed a rule violation report against him, or denied him access to the law library, based on a retaliatory motive, rather than for a legitimate penological goal. See Pratt v. Rowland, 65 F.3d 802, 807-09 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     