
    HALL v. STATE.
    (No. 7424.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 14, 1923.)
    Intoxicating liquors <§=3236(5)—Evidence ‘held to warrant conviction for manufacturing.
    In a prosecution for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, evidence that a hot still, mash, whisky, and 200 pounds of sugar, were found on defendant’s premises, and that defendant broke one. of the receptacles containing whisky, was suflicient to support a conviction.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Tar-rant County; George E. Hosey, Judge.
    C. E. Hall was convicted of the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The officers found in a small garage on appellant’s premises a still which was so hot it was necessary for them to use sacks to protect their hands while dismantling it. Mash and whisky were also found, as well as two 100-pound sacks of sugar. Appellant was in his residence when the officers reached the place. They took him with them to the garage and as he entered he picked up some instrument and broke one of the receptacles containing whisky. The evidence amply warrants the conviction.

The Judgment is ordered affirmed.  