
    HOOPER v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 23, 1913.)
    Cbiminal Law (§ 1090) — Appeal—Bills os’ Exception — Statement op Facts — Necessity.
    On appeal in a criminal ease, where the indictment, charge, judgment, and sentence were in proper form, there were no questions open for consideration, in the absence of a bill of exceptions or statement of facts.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.]
    Appeal from District Court, Angelina County; L. D. Guinn, Special Judge.
    Sam Hooper was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   PRENDERGAST, J..

Appellant was convicted for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in Angelina county after prohibition had been put in effect in said county, since the enactment making such sale a felony, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

There is neither a bill of exception nor a statement of facts in this case. No question is raised which we can consider without a statement of facts. The indictment, charge, judgment of conviction, and sentence are in proper form.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.  