
    Albert J. Sprague, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.
   The case as settled is in flagrant violation of the rule requiring the testimony to be reduced to narrative, and greatly increased the work of reading it. The like should not occur. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Mo opinion. Present — Woodward, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ. 
      
       See General Rules of Practice, rule 34.— [Rbp.
     