
    Maximilian Lewinson et al., Resp’ts, v. Lorenz Reich, App’lt.
    
      (City Court of New York, General Term,
    
    
      Filed November 27, 1893.)
    
    Contract—Direction of Verdict.
    In an action upon contract, where there is a dispute as to whether plaintiffs had performed all the work required under the contract before they would be entitled to the payment demanded, that question should he submitted to the jury, and it is error to direct a verdict for plaintiffs.
    Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon verdict directed by the court.
    
      William R. Keese, for resp’ts; Vanderpoel Chiming & Green., for app’lt.
   Rewburger, J.

This action was brought to recover from defendant an installment claimed to be due on a contract between the parties to this action wherein the plaintiffs contracted to erect certain fire-escapes upon property of defendant in a good, workmanlike and substantial manner to the satisfaction and under the direction of the building department of the city of New York.

The installments were to be paid at different stages of the work.

The answer of the defendant denied all of the material allegations of the complaint, and set up a counterclaim for damages by reason of the unskillful manner in which the work was done by plaintiffs.

At the close of the testimony, the plaintiff moved for a direction, which was granted.

The trial justice erred. There wás a dispute as to whether the plaintiffs performed all the work required under the contract before they were entitled to the payment demanded, and that question should have been submitted to the jury for their determination.

For these reasons, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Van Wtck and McCarthy, JJ., concur.  