
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto HERRERA-ARTEAGA, a.k.a. Alberto Herrera Arteaga, a.k.a. Juan A. Rita-Herrera, a.k.a. Juan Alberto Rita-Herrera, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 16-10493, 16-10494
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted September 26, 2017 
    
    OCTOBER 2, 2017
    Erica McCallum, Assistant U.S., Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Eric W. Kessler, Kessler Law Offices, Mesa, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

In these consolidated appeals, Alberto Herrera-Arteaga appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 61-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and concurrent 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Herrera-Arteaga’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Herrera-Arteaga the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 76, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on these direct appeals.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     