
    Dennis McCarthy v. William Mooney.
    New trial—verdict against the evidence. Where the parties testify on the trial of a cause, and the evidence is conflicting, it is for the jury to deterinine which party to believe.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county-; the Hon. Erastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding.
    This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Mooney against McCarthy, for work and labor done. A trial was had before the court and a j ury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $210. The defendant thereupon took this appeal, and asks a reversal of the judgment, upon the ground that the verdict was against the evidence.
    Mr. O. B. Sansum, for the appellant.
    Mr. A. C. Story, for the appellee.
   Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an action for work and labor. It has already been before this court upon a judgment for the plaintiff, and remanded for a second trial, upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient. Since then it has been tried again, and the parties have themselves been sworn, under the recent statute, and the jury rendered another verdict for the plaintiff. As the record is now presented, we cannot say the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. It was for the jury to determine which party to believe.

There was no error in the giving or refusing instructions.

Judgment affirmed.  