
    (85 Tex. Cr, R. 97)
    FOVELLA v. STATE.
    (No. 5344.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 19, 1919.)
    Ckiminal Law @=>1090(1) — Absence of Bill of Exceptions — Affirmance.
    In the absence of bill of exceptions and statement of facts, judgment will be affirmed, the indictment being sufficient, and no fundamental error appearing.
    Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; W. D. Howe, Judge.
    ¡Fermina Fovellá was convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, and she appeals.
    Affirmed.
    *E. A. Berry, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   LATTTMORE, J.

In this case the appellant was tried for the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property valued at more than ⅞50, and was convicted, and her punishment fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The case is before this court without a bill of exceptions or a statement of tacts; the motion for new trial complains of certain errors, the decision of which would be governed by the facts if properly before us; but in the absence of a statement of facts we cannot tell whether the matters complained of were error or not.

The indictment sufficiently charges the offense, and, there appearing no fundamental errors, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.  