
    No. 51092.
    Protests 116509-K, etc., of B. Shackman & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690), the merchandise-in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.  