
    Ricky Lee PRUITT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 78014.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    April 3, 2001.
    Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON and SULLIVAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ricky L. Pruitt, appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).  