
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eduardo HINOJOSA-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-40678
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 17, 2014.
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Eduardo Hinojosa-Munoz, Welch, WV, pro se.
    Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Eduardo Hinojosa-Munoz (Hinojosa) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hino-josa has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     