
    Oscar Garduno CALZADA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-71190.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 18, 2006.
    
    Filed Dec. 21, 2006.
    Monica N. Ganjoo, Esq., Ganjoo Law Office, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jennifer Keeney, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: GOODWIN, McKEOWN and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner cannot challenge the validity of his underlying convictions in this petition for review. Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
      This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     