
    Spalding v. Dickinson.
    Error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
    No. 82,
    argued with No. 81, ante, 483.
    
      Mr. W. Willoughby for plaintiff in error'.
    
      Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Dickinson for defendant in error.
   Mr. Justice Harlan:

The defendant in error succeeded Mr. Vilas in the office of Postmaster General. The declaration in the present case is, in all material respects, like that in Spalding v. Vilas, just decided. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in- that case the judgment is

Affirmed.  