
    Henry William TELLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-15032
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted September 27, 2016 
    
    Filed October 06, 2016
    Henry William Telles, Pro Se
    Eric Daniel Farrar, Law Offices of Daniel Farrar, Turlock, CA, for Defendant-Appellee
    Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Henry William Telles appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We cannot review any of Telles’ contentions challenging his jury trial because Telles has failed to provide the relevant pre-trial and trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide trial transcripts).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     