
    Seagraves et al. v. Blake.
    May 14, 1912.
    Complaint. Before Judge Daniel. Pike superior court. May 20, 1912.
    
      B. C. Armistead, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Cleveland & Goodrich, contra.
   Lumpkin, J.

The evidence authorized a finding in favor of the plaintiff; and, as against the defendants, there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial and allowing the verdict to stand, after being reduced as to the amount of interest and attorney’s fees due on the note upon which the suit was based.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.  