
    The People v. Ramos.
    Appeal from the District Court of Mayagtiez.
    No. 8.
    Decided May 5, 1903.
    Bill op Exceptions. — Bbeoe apparent prom the récord. — When there is ' no bill of exceptions filed, and it does not appear from the record that the trial court has committed any error, the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed.
    
      Mr. del Toro, Fiscal, for respondent.
    Appellant did not appear.
   Me. Justice Sulzbachek

delivered the following opinion of the court:

The defendant Ramos was duly tried and convicted by the District Court of Mayagiiez for the crime- of grand larceny. He moved for a new trial which was refused by the court, and appeals to this, court. No bill of exceptions appears in the record; nor is there any writing referring to any error committed by the trial court. This Supreme Court finds no error whatsoever, and therefore, the judgment of the District Court of Mayagiiez should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Messrs. Chief Justice Quiñones, and Associate Justices Hernández, Figueras, and MacLeary, concurring.  