
    2703.
    Southern Railway Co. v. Chunn.
    Decided November 11, 1910.
    Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton. May 18, 1910.
    
      Maddox, McCainy & Shumate, George A. II. Harris & Son, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Ennis & Shaw, contra.
   Hill, O. J.

Tlie statutory presumption raised on proof of the killing of plaintiff’s mule by the running of defendant’s locomotive or cars was not fully and satisfactorily rebutted. Besides, there was some slight circumstantial evidence in aid of the presumption. No complaint is made of any error of law. Judgment affirmed.  