
    MARY HOWARD, RESPONDENT, v. ESSEX MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION, APPELLANT,
    Submitted December 9, 1918
    Decided February 6, 1919.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed:
    “This is a suit on a life benefit certificate. The only question is whether the premium was paid a day before or a day after the death of the assured. This is a question of fact and we cannot review the finding of the trial judge, since there was evidence that it was paid the day before. The fact that premiums were in arrears at the time of payment is of no importance, as there is nothing in the certificate which makes it void for non-payment of dues.
    “Let the judgment be affirmed, with costs.”
    For the appellant, Edward R. McGlynn
    
    For the respondent, Arthur B. Seymour.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.  