
    [Chambersburg,
    November 2, 1826.]
    WALKER against PENNELL and another.
    
      IN ERROR.
    
      Scire facias on a judgment to recover a debt, which the plaintiff stated he had recovered, of four hundred and forty-three dollars and seventeen cents: on nul tiel record pleaded, the judgment produced was for nine hundred and eighty-seven dollars: held, that-the defendant was entitled to judgment.
    Writ of error to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin county, in which the plaintiff in error, James Walker, was plaintiff below', in an alias scire facias issued against George Pennell and Henry Guiger, the defendants in error and defendants below, to revive a judgment rendered on a former scire facias.
    
    
      Findlay, for the plaintiff in error,
    
      G. Chambers, contra.
   Per Curiam.

Issue was joined in this case, in the Court of Common Pleas, on the issue of nul tiél record, and. the court decided in favour of the defendant. On inspection of the record, it appears that a scire facias was issued by the plaintiff for the recovery of a debt of four hundred and forty-three dollars and seventeen cents, for which he had obtained judgment against the defendant. But the record produced in support of the scire facias, shows a judgment for the sum of nine hundred and eighty-seven dollars. We are therefore of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the plaintiff having failed in his proof of the record recited in the scire facias.'

Judgment affirmed.  