
    15709.
    Hamilton v. The State.
    Decided August 8, 1924.
    Driving automobile while intoxicated; from Barrow superior court — Judge Russell. February 2, 1924. ’
    
      Quillian & Drake, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Pemberton Cooley, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bkoyles, C. J.

The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and the amendment to the motion is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  