
    Federal Credit Co. v. Newman et al.
    
    (In Banc.
    Jan. 10, 1944.)
    [16 So. (2d) 153.
    No. 35533.]
    Hugh V. Wall, of Brookhaven, and Luther A. Whittington, of Natchez, for appellee, on motion to dismiss appeal.
    
      Heidelberg & Roberts, of Hattiesburg, and Fred A. Anderson, Jr., of Gloster, for appellant, in reply to motion to dismiss ’ appeal.
   Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

By permission of the chancellor, the Receiver of the Mississippi Motor Corporation filed an original bill of complaint against a number of alleged debtors of the Corporation, including the Federal Credit Company, which company answered the bill, made its answer a cross-bill and prayed for affirmative relief. Afterwards on motion of the stockholders of the Mississippi Motor Corporation and others the order granting the Receiver permission to file this bill of complaint was revoked. The bill of complaint was then dismissed by the court, as was also the cross-bill of the Federal Credit Company; the dismissal to be without prejudice to the right of that Company to obtain in another proceeding the relief prayed for in its cross-bill. The Federal Credit Company alone appeals.

The only question on this motion is whether the decree dismissing this cross-bill is final or interlocutory. If the latter, the appeal admittedly will not lie. The decree dismissing the appellant’s cross-bill, though without.prejudice, is a final decree within the meaning of Section 13 of the Code of 1930. Solomon v. Continental Baking Co., 174 Miss. 890, 165 So. 607, 166 So. 376. Consequently, an appeal will lie therefrom.

Whether the court below erred in dismissing this cross-bill will arise when, but not until, the case is submitted on its merits.

Motion overruled.  