
    13757.
    Woodall v. Swift & Company.
    Decided December 12, 1922.
    Foreclosure of mortgage; from Lamar superior court — Judge - Searcy. May 19, 1922.
    Cr. D. Dominick, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Reagan & Reagan, contra.
   Luke, J.

1. There was no conflict in the evidence, and it demanded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. It was therefore not error for the court to direct such a verdict.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial which complains of the exclusion of evidence is without merit. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  