
    Derrick CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105617
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: February 20, 2018
    Gwenda Renee Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Derrick Curtis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).  