
    40 A.3d 55
    ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF, v. ROGER, INC., ROGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., ROGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., ROGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS.
    March 22, 2012.
   This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is granted, and defendants’ cross-petition for certification in C-304-11 is hereby granted, limited to the issue whether plaintiff retains fifty percent ownership of Roger Professional Services and Roger Distributed Solutions.  