
    LOUIS WATERMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MAX TAUB ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted October 29, 1925
    Decided February 1, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 216.
    For the respondents, Morris Umansky.
    
    For the appellants, Tiffany, Brugler & Wittreich.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.  