
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose MARTINEZ-DELOERA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10606.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 2004.
    Decided Oct. 14, 2004.
    Michael Allen Lee, U.S. Attorney Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Carmen L. Fischer, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: MESKILL, TROTT, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Hon. Thomas J. Meslcill, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Martinez-DeLoera appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence found after a traffic stop. We affirm.

1. Standard of Review

We review de novo a district court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence based on a determination of reasonable suspicion. United States v. Lopez-Soto, 205 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir.2000). We review the district court’s underlying factual findings for clear error. Id.

2. Reasonable Suspicion

A traffic stop conforms with the Fourth Amendment if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the driver committed a traffic violation. Id. at 1104-05. By statute, Arizona drivers making right turns must turn “as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway.” Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 28-751(1). The district court found that the driver of the car in which Martinez-DeLoera was a passenger did not turn as close as practicable to the right-hand curb, in violation of the Arizona statute. Martinez-DeLoera fails to show how this finding is clearly erroneous. Thus, the evidence adduced at trial fully supports the district court’s conclusion that Officer Ruiz had reasonable suspicion to stop the car in which Martinez-DeLoera was a passenger.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     