
    Fulton v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
    (New York Common Pleas
    General Term,
    December, 1892.)
    A motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals should not be granted unless a novel question of law is involved.
    Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals,
    
      A. I. Sire, for plaintiff (respondent).
    
      WilUavi II ArnouM, for defendant (appellant).
   Bisohoff, J.

Ho sufficient ground is assigned in support of this motion. Reference to the opinions (19 N. Y. Supp. 660) disclosed that no novel question of law was involved in the appeal, which is our only justification for adding to the seriously lengthened calendar of the court of last resort. Hence, the leave asked for, if granted, could result only in vexations, delay and expense to the respondent. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Daly, Ch. J., and Pbyob, J., concur.

Motion denied.  