
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gilberto GARCIA-GALAVIZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-50095.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 15, 2004.
    
    Decided March 24, 2004.
    Jennifer T. Manion, AUSA, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Casey Donovan, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, LEAVY and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Gilberto Garcia-Galaviz appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release, arising from his underlying conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, for importing marijuana into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. He concedes that Ninth Circuit precedent forecloses his contention that 18 U.S.C. § 3583, which authorizes the imposition of a term of supervised release, is unconstitutional as applied under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). United States v. Liero, 298 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1132, 123 S.Ct. 913, 154 L.Ed.2d 820 (2003). Garcia-Galaviz states that he presents the issue merely to preserve it should ensuing Supreme Court precedent alter the legal landscape. The judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     