
    Gertrude L. Moore, Plaintiff, v. Henry G. Moore, Defendant.
    (No. 1.)
    First Department,
    December 23, 1910.
    Appeal — failure to pay alimony — dismissal of appeal.
    Au appeal from a. judgment rendered in an action to enforce á foreign judgment ordering the defendant to pay a sum of money as alimony, and also, from an order punishing him for contempt for failing to pay it, will not be dismissed or stayed because the appellant has not' obeyed the. judgment appealed from and has removed to another State, so that the order punishing him for contempt cannot be executed.
    Motion to dismiss an appeal.
    
      Morgan J. O'Brien, for the motion.
    
      Abraham Snydeeker, opposed.
   Per Curiam :

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered on the 1st day of April, 1910, and also an appeal from an order entered on the 6th of October, 1910, pun-' isliing the defendant for'contempt in failing to obey the said judgment, or, in' the alternative, staying the defendant’s proceedings upon the appeal until he subjects himself to the jurisdiction of the court, or. complies with the said judgment. . .

This action was brought to enforce a judgment obtained in the State of Pennsylvania, by which the defendant was required to pay to the plaintiff, as alimony, a certain sum 'of money. The ground of this motion is that after the judgment was rendered a certified copy was duly served on, the defendant, and after the order was made committing him for contempt for refusing to comply with this judgment, he left this State and has since resided in the State of New Jersey. The effect of granting this motion would be to prevent the defendant from having the judgment and the order to enforce the same reviewed, because he has failed to comply with' the judgment and has left the jurisdiction, so that the order committing him for contempt for failing to comply with the judgment could not be executed.

So far as appears from the papers before, us, the defendant has proceeded regularly with his appeals • and we do not think he should be deprived of his right to review the judgment because he has failed to comply with its terms, nor that the court is justified in dismissing an appeal because of a failure of the defendant to obey it. Undoubtedly, the court would be justified in refusing to grant to the defendant any favor that he should ask while he is in contempt and refuses to submit to the jurisdiction of the court; but he has an absolute right to review the judgment and order appealed from, and that right should not *be taken away because he has failed to obey the judgment sought to be reviewed.

The motion to dismiss the appeal dr stay the defendant’s proceedings is, therefore, denied, without costs.

Present — Ingbaham, P. J., Claeke, Scott, Millee and Dowling, JJ.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Settle order on notice.  