
    Richard ROUSAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Diana SCHORAGO; et ah, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 06-15348.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 16, 2007.
    
    Filed May 23, 2007.
    Richard Rousay, Sacramento, CA, pro se.
    Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Richard Rousay appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 584 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Rousay’s action as frivolous because the amended complaint contains indecipherable factual patterns and unsupported legal assertions which have no basis in law or fact. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1128 n. 8 (9th Cir. 2000).

Rousay’s remaining contentions lack merit.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     