
    In re Alton BATES, II.
    No. 2015-B-2102.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Jan. 15, 2016.
   ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

| tThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with a client, mishandled his client trust account, and notarized an affidavit outside the presence of the signatory. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Alton Bates, II, Louisiana Bar Roll number 27372, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. It is further ordered that this suspension shall be deferred in its entirety and that respondent shall be placed on supervised probation for a period of two years, subject to the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against' respondfent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty-days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

CRICHTON, J., dissents, and would reject the Petition for Consent Discipline as too lenient. .

CRICHTON, J., dissents and would reject the Petition for Consent Discipline as too lenient.  