
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro ROJO, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-20366
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 19, 2011.
    James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Pedro Rojo, Jr., Houston, TX, pro se.
    Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Rojo, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rojo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The alternative motion for a hearing is DENIED.

The record reveals a clerical error in the judgment. Although the record shows that the district court orally imposed and intended to impose a total fine of $2,000, the written judgment also states that a $2,000 fine was “imposed as to each of Counts 1, 3, and 4” to reach the total fine of $2,000. The case is therefore REMANDED for the correction of this clerical error. Fed. R.Crim. P. 36. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     