
    Crockett et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lewis.
    Final Judgment. A judgment for costs with, an order of execution, hut without other disposition of the case, is not a final judgment, and no writ of error lies from it, (following Boggess v. Cox, 48 Mo. 278).
    
      Error to Putnam Circuit Court. — Hon. John W. Henry, Judge
    
      A. W. Mullins with A. J. Hoshinson for plaintiffs in error.
    
      C. L. Dobson for defendant in error.
   Norton, J.

— The record in this case shows no final judgment from which a writ of error can be prosecuted. It shows that the jury retired, and after a short time returned into court their verdict as follows: “.Non Suit.” “ It is therefore considered by the court that the defendant do have and recover against the plaintiffs his costs in this suit laid out and expended, and that he have thereof execution.” The writ of error will, with the concurrence of the other judges, therefore be dismissed under the authority of Boggess v. Cox, 48 Mo. 278.

Dismissed.  