
    21476.
    Smith Motor Car Co. et al. v. Universal Credit Co.
    Decided March 1, 1933.
    
      Harris & Harris, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Wright & Covington, contra.
   Jenkins, P. J.

Under the answer returned by the Supreme Court to the question certified to it in this case (176 Ga. 565, 168 S. E. 18), the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and the judge erred in directing a verdict in its favor.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens <md Sutton, JJ., concur.  