
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Braithwaite, Appellant.
    [869 NYS2d 349]
   Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that “substantial justice” dictated the denial of the defendant’s application for resentencing )(see People v Curry, 52 AD3d 732 [2008]; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156 [2008]; People v Stamps, 50 AD3d 827 [2008]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.E, Santucci, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.  