
    KUFFERMAN et al., Respondents, v. NEW ORK CITY RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme mrt, Appellate Term.
    March 26, 1906.)
    Apia! from Municipal Court, Borough of Manittan, Fifth District. Action by Samuel Kufrman and others against the New York City ailway Company. From a judgment for aintiffs, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Wilim E. Weaver, for appellant.
    A. B. Greenirg, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with sts.

SCOTT, P. J.

(dissenting). I dissent. It ipears to be a physical impossibility that the agon could have been hit where it was, and ■iven against the elevated railroad pillar as aintiffs’ witnesses say it was, if the accident ippened as plaintiff claims that it did.  