
    PEOPLE v. WALKER
    Bobbery — Bobbery Unarmed — Identification — Evidence — Sufficiency.
    The record contained sufficient evidence to sustain a jury verdict of guilty of unarmed robbery where the victim and a mailman who came to his aid unequivocally identified the defendant and described his participation in the erime (MCLA § 750.530).
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    46 Am Jur, Robbery § 41 et seq.
    
    Appeal from Recorder’s Court of Detroit, Frank G. Schemanske, J.
    Submitted Division 1 October 16, 1969, at Detroit.
    (Docket No. 6,354.)
    Decided October 28, 1969.
    Larry Lamont Walker was convicted by a jury of robbery unarmed. Defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, and Leonard Meyers, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
    
      Charles Rubinoff, for defendant.
    Before: Lesinski, C. J., and j. H. Gillis and Danhof, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of robbery unarmed and sentenced to 3 to 15 years in prison. CL 1948, § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.798).

The only question raised on appeal by defendant’s court-appointed counsel is whether the evidentiary record sustains the verdict of the jury.

At the trial two eyewitnesses, the victim and a mailman who came to his aid, unequivocally identified the defendant and described his participation in the crime. The record unquestionably contains ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict.

Affirmed.  