
    No. 44630.
    Protest 818405-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co. (Philadelphia).
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware the same as that the subject of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.  