
    THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., PROSECUTORS AND DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. ARCHIBALD W. CONKLIN, DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 10, 1911
    Decided November 20, 1911.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, JoJm B. Har3m.
    
    For the defendant in error, Herbert Boggs.
    
   Per Curiam.

This case was argued with the case of Newark v. Tunis, ante p. 461, decided at the present term. It is similar in its essential facts, and is controlled by the decision in the Tunis case. For the reasons given in the opinion filed in that ease, the judgment of the Supreme Court will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chaftcelloe, Chief Justice, Tbeftchakd, Paekee, Beegeft, Bogeet, Yeedeftbuegh, Congdoft, White, JJ. 9.

For reversal—None.  