
    ALLEN v. STATE.
    (No. 6056.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 8, 1921.)
    1. Gaming <§=>106 — Indictment under act making it an offense to permit premises .to be used for gaming will not support conviction of feiony. ’
    An indictment under Code Or. Proc. 1911, art. 572, declaring that, if any person shall permit any game prohibited by the provisions of the chapter to be played in his house, or a house under his control, the said house, being a public place, etc., shall be fined not less than $25 or more than $100, will not support a conviction for felony.
    2. Gaming <§=>63(3) — Act making it a felony to permit premises to be used for gambling held not to repeal statute relating to misdemeanors.
    Code Or. Proc. 1911, art. 572, declaring that, if any person shall permit any game prohibited by the provisions of the chapter to be played in his house, or a house under his con trol, the house, being a public place, etc., shall be fined, was not repealed by article 559, making it a felony for one knowingly to permit bis premises to be used “as a place for tbe purpose of being used as a place to bet,” etc.
    Appeal from District Court, Taylor County; W. R. Ely, Judge.
    John Allen was convicted of felony, and he appeals.
    Reversed, and prosecution dismissed.
    Kirby, King & Keeble, of Abilene, for appellant.,
    R. H. Hamilton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, P. J.

Appellant was' convicted of a felony. Punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment charged the following:

“* * * Did then and there unlawfully and knowingly permit property and premises there situate and then and there under his control to be used as a. place to bet and wager and to gamble with dice then and there played, and did then and there, knowingly permit said property and premises to be used as a place where people resorted to gamble, bet and wager upon games then and there played with dice, against the peace and dignity of the State.”

' Article 572, Code of Criminal Procedure, reads thus:

“If any person shall permit any game prohibited by the provisions of this chapter to be played in his house, or a house under his control, the said house being a public place, or the said premises being appurtenances to a public place, he shall be fined not less than twenty-five nor than more than one hundred dollars.” Act March 5, 1881, p. 17.

In article 559. Code of Criminal Procedure, it is made a felony for one knowingly to permit his premises to be used “as a place for the purpose of being used as a place to bet” or to permit gambling on his premises nor used as a place where people resort for the purpose of using it as a place to gamble.

The indictment in the instant case is drawn under article 572, supra. An indictment so drawn will not support a conviction of felony. The contrary was held in Robertson v. State, 70 Tex. Cr. R. 310, 159 S. W. 713, in which case, by a divided court, the decision to the contrary rendered in Simons v. State, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 339, 120 S. W. 208, was overruled.-

We have reached the conclusion that, in holding that article 572 was not repealed by the > enactment of article 559, the conclusion reached by the unanimous court and expressed in the opinion written by Judge Ramsey in the Simons Case, supra, was correct. Our reasons for this view are fully expressed in the case of Francis v. State (No. 5775) 233 S. W. -, this day decided. We deem it unnecessary to repeat them, but order that the judgment of the trial court be reversed, and the prosecution upon the count quoted be dismissed. 
      <gssFor other eases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     