
    Argued January 20,
    affirmed February 7, 1978
    SULLIVAN, Respondent, v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER COMPANY, Petitioner.
    
    (No. 76-5515, CA 9211)
    574 P2d 686
    Marshall C. Cheney, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Donald O. Costello, Portland.
    Thomas A. Caruso, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Bailey, Welch, Bruun & Green, Portland.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Johnson, Gillette and Roberts, Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

The sole issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether or not claimant’s myocardial infarction is compensable. The referee and Board held that it was. All the medical evidence from four different doctors supports compensability, albeit with varying degrees of assurance. The employer’s principal argument is that this medical evidence is based upon misstatements of fact by the claimant to the doctors. We do not find the misstatements substantial. Furthermore, the referee found that claimant was credible.

Affirmed.  