
    In re the MARRIAGE OF Charles Henry HOELSCHER and Virginia Lee Hoelscher. Charles Henry HOELSCHER, Respondent/Defendant, v. Virginia Lee HOELSCHER, Appellant/Movant.
    Nos. 60584, 60649.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
    June 30, 1992.
    
      Lee Reneau Elliott, Troy, for appellant/movant.
    Donald Eugene Dalton, Jr., St. Charles, for respondent/defendant.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this domestic relations action, wife, Virginia Lee Hoelscher, appeals from the trial court’s order on her motion pendente lite as amended. The trial court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  