
    N. C. HUGHES et al. v. E. R. CROOKER.
    
      Ward & Grilnes for plaintiff.
    
      W. G. Hodman for defendant.
   Per Curiam.

The Court below, has found as a fact that the defendant is a non-resident of -North Carolina, and we find there is sufficient evidence to support such finding. The motion to dissolve the attachment was properly denied.

Affirmed.  