
    INGRAM V. THE STATE.
    (Decided Jan. 19, 1911.)
    Appeal from Clay County Court.
    Heard before Hon. E. J. Garrison,
    Whatley & Cornelius, for ^appellant. Alexander M. Garber, Attorney General, for tlie State.
   Somerville, J.

As to the organization of the grand jury, the questions presented were decided adversely to the appellant in Patterson v. The State, 171 Ala. 2; 54 South. 696. The predicate for the admission of dying declarations was sufficient. — McEwen v. The State, 152 Ala. 38; 44 South. 619. Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., Anderson find Sayre, JJ., concur.  