
    J. SVENDSGAARD v. MABEL SVENDSGAARD.
    
    December 1, 1922.
    No. 23,105.
    Dissolution of attachment sustained.
    Upon the showing made the court rightly dissolved a writ of attachment issued upon the ground of a fraudulent disposition of property.
    
      Action in tbe district court for Hennepin county to recover $8,400. From an order, Montgomery, J., ordering tbe writ of attacbment issued on May 2, 1922, to be vacated, plaintiff appealed.
    Affirmed.
    
      J. Svensgaard, pro se.
    
      Eriksson cC- Converse, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 190 N. W. 894.
    
   Dibell, J.

Tbe trial court granted defendant’s motion to dissolve a writ of attacbment issued upon tbe ground of a fraudulent disposition of property. Tbe plaintiff appeals.

Tbe defendant meets tbe affidavit for attacbment by a direct denial. Tbe plaintiff’s showing in opposition does not overcome it as a matter of law; indeed, it would be difficult to sustain an order of tbe trial court refusing to dissolve. It is unnecessary to discuss tbe affidavits. Most of tbe record is matter extraneous to tbe issue arising on tbe motion.

Order affirmed.  