
    HUKILL et al. v. THARP et al.
    
    No. 2247.
    Opinion Filed November 19, 1912.
    (128 Pac. 113.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error file no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pae. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
    (Syllabus by Sharp, C.)
    
      Brror from District Court, Ottawa County; T. L. Brown, Judge.
    
    Action by J. T. Hukill and others against J. B. Tharp and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
    Dismissed.
    
      
      Dick Rice, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      F. D. Fulkerson, for defendants in error.
   Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734, 124 Pac. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857, 124 Pac. 59.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  