
    24269.
    McArthur et al. v. McArthur.
    Decided March 8, 1935.
    
      Saffold & Sharpe, for plaintiffs in' error.
    
      Lanlcford & Rogers, contra.
   Bboyx.es, C. J.

While the evidence for the defendants would have authorized a finding in their favor, the evidence, direct and circumstantial, for the plaintiff supported the verdict for the plaintiff; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.  