
    21538.
    Hardin v. King Lumber Company.
   Broyles, O. J.

1. The court did not err in any of its rulings upon the pleadings.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and as the motion for a new trial contained tlie usual general grounds only, tlie refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Decided June 19, 1931.

Zaclt Arnold, A. M. Zellner, II. A. Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error.

James W. Harris, B. L. Williams, Jr., Bennet ■& Peacock, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.  