
    WALKER et al., Respondents, v. WINTERS et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    December 5, 1906.)
    Action by Fred Walker and others against Edward Winters and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

SPRING, J.,

dissents, on the ground that exceptions to the charge and to the reception of ■evidence present reversible errors, particularly in the charge that the defendants were required to use the best mechanical appliances and contrivances known in that locality, designed to prevent the escape of sparks and live coals.  