
    David E. Heim et al., Appellants, v Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc., et al., Respondents.
    Submitted February 21, 2006;
    decided May 9, 2006
   Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.  