
    No. 645
    WADE v. ADAMS
    Ohio Appeals, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
    No. 4407.
    Decided June 4, 1923
    Thi» opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
    EVIDENCE — Judgment rendered on uncorroborated testimony.
    (Note: The. facts of the case are not given in the opinion.)
    Vickery, Levine and Sullivan, JJ.
    Attorneys — A. H. Krause, for Wade; White, Brewer & Curtiss, for Adams.
   PER CURIAM

Epitomized Opinion

Adams sued Wade and recovered judgment in Cleveland Municipal Court. Wade prosecuted error on ground that judgment Was contrary to weight of evidence. Adam’s testimony was uncorroborated. Court of Appeals in affirming judgment held:

1. While in a sense the evidence of Adams was uncorroborated there is no rule of law which demands corroboration in such a case. If court was satisfied Adam’s version of transaction was to be believed, rather than other party’s version, he was elerly within his rights.  