
    3380.
    Schley v. The State.
    Decided June 7, 1911.
    Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Swainsboro— Judge Daniel. February 20, 1911:
    
      3. J. Tyson, Augustus F. Lee, for plaintiff in error.
    
      A. S. Bradley, solicitor, contra.
   Hill, C. J.

No error of' law is complained of, and tlie evidence for the prosecution fully supports the verdict. The accused introduced no evidence, and his statement to the jury fully authorized the inference that his claim that the bottle of whisky was a loan was simply a pretext for what was in fact a sale. Judgment affirmed.  