
    PATH, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 18, 1903.)
    Action by John Path against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and the denial of a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
    H. A. Robinson (F. Angelo Gaynor and Bayard H. Ames, of counsel), for appellant.
    Bennett & Silverman, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The verdict is attacked on the ground that it is against the weight of evidence. Upon a review of the whole case we can find no sufficient reason for disturbing it, especially as no motion was made for the direction of a verdict. The defendant’s exception to the admission of evidence does not present reversible error. Judgment and o.rder affirmed, with costs.  