
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emmett BUFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-2634.
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    Argued April 19, 2012.
    Decided April 24, 2012.
    Terra Leigh Brown Reynolds, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John L. Sullivan, Glencoe, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge, DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
   Order

After a bench trial, the district court found Emmett Buffman guilty of possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug crime. 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). He pleaded guilty to four other charges. The district court sentenced him to 60 months’ imprisonment on the § 924(c) charge, and as the statute provides this sentence runs consecutively to the 60-month sentence on the other four convictions, for a total sentence of 120 months.

Agents found the gun—a loaded .22 caliber revolver—on a shelf in Buffman’s home immediately below 61.5 grams of cocaine. Before the grand jury, the prosecutor asked Buffman whether he kept the gun to protect his drug-distribution business. He replied: “I guess, yes, ma’am.” This admission was introduced at trial, and the judge inferred from Buffman’s answer, plus the proximity between the gun and the drugs, that the weapon had been possessed “in furtherance of’ the drug crime. That was a rational inference for the trier of fact to draw; we reject Buffman’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.

Buffman contends that making the firearms sentence consecutive to the drag sentences violates the cruel and unusual punishments clause of the eighth amendment. Yet the total sentence of imprisonment, for a multi-kilogram drug operation plus a weapons conviction, was only ten years. The Supreme Court held in Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991), that life in prison for distributing 650 grams of cocaine is permissible under the eighth amendment. Buffman’s 120-month sentence for a larger quantity of drugs, plus a weapon, is much lower. Nothing in the Constitution forbids marginal deterrence for extra crimes; if the sentence for the firearm were concurrent with the sentence for distributing the cocaine, then there would be neither deterrence nor punishment for the extra danger created by mixing guns with drugs. Buff-man’s total sentence is 150 months below the low end of the range computed under the Sentencing Guidelines. He has been treated leniently and has no complaint.

Affirmed.  