
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Brijido MEJIA-PIMENTAL, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-30414.
    D.C. No. CR-99-00147-001-JET.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.
    
    Decided Feb. 22, 2005.
    Douglas James Hill, Esq., USTA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tacoma, WA, for Plaintiff — Appellee.
    Bonnie E. MacNaughton, AUSA, Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Annette L. Hayes, Esq., USSE — Office of the U.S. Attorney, and Peggy Sue Juergens, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Defendant — Appellant.
    Before FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Brijido Mejia-Pimental was convicted under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2 and appeals his sentence of 210-months. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Appellant’s motion for permission to file a second supplemental brief is granted. The clerk shall file the brief received on January 24, 2005.

We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, 400 F.3d 646, No. 02-30326, 2005 WL 350811 (9th Cir.2005).

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     