
    In Re: Michael Eugene YOUNG, Petitioner.
    No. 09-1834.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 19, 2009.
    Decided: Nov. 5, 2009.
    Michael Eugene Young, Petitioner Pro Se.
    
      Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Young petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has scheduled a hearing on Young’s motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted in Young’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.  