
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis Gerardo MARTINEZ-LEYVA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-50440
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    July 16, 2015.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Joseph Dean Vasquez, Esq., El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Luis Gerardo Martinez-Leyva, Fci Her-long Satellite Camp, Herlong, CA, pro se.
    Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Gerardo Martinez-Leyva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Martinez-Leyva has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Martinez-Leyva’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 'therein, as well as Martinez-Ley-va’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Martinez-Leyva’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     