
    BENJAMIN v. GREEN.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
    December 4, 1913.)
    Witnesses (§ 324)—Impeachment—Impeaching Own Witness.
    It was error to permit plaintiff, who had called defendant as a witness for plaintiff, to show, for purposes of impeachment, that defendant had been three times convicted of grand larceny.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Witnesses, Cent. Dig. § 1097; Dec. Dig. § 324.*]
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.
    Action by Bertha Benjamin against Yetta Green. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Reversed, and new trial ordered.
    Argued October term, 1913, before SEABURY, GUY, and BI-JUR, JJ.
    Isidor Cohn, of New York City, for appellant.
    Alexander Lewis, of New York City (Siegfried Steinberg, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes
    
   GUY, J.

This action was brought to recover for the conversion of certain jewelry by reason of defendant having picked plaintiff’s pocketbook in a fish store on November 18, 1910.

Defendant was called as a witness for plaintiff. On her direct examination she testified that she could not tell her own full and correct name. Her counsel then admitted that it was Yetta Green. She testified that all she possessed was held in the name of Yetta Green. Witness was then asked, over the objection and exception of defendant, whether she had been convicted of crime, and answered that she had been convicted of grand larceny three times. The admission of this evidence for the purpose of impeaching plaintiff’s own witness was prejudicial error.

The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.  