
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tracy VAUGHN, also known as Chopper, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-1060
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 19, 2016
    Filed: August 24, 2016
    
      Nancy A. Svoboda, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    David R. Stickman, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Tracy Vaughn, Pro Se.
    Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court denied his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After careful de novo review of the record, we find no reason to reverse the district court’s denial of Vaughn’s motion for a sentence reduction. See United States v. Logan, 710 F.3d 856, 857 (8th Cir. 2013) (appeals court reviews de novo district court’s determination that movant was not eligible for reduction under § 3582(c)(2)).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Vaughn’s pro se objection to submission of this appeal without oral argument is denied. 
      
      . The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
     