
    Alejandro MUNIZ-OROSCO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 15-70937
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted November 15, 2017 
    
    Filed November 20, 2017
    Sung Uk Park, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Sung U. Park, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner
    
      Michele Yvette Frances Sarko, Esquire, Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent
    Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Alejandro Muniz-Orosco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal and denying a motion to continue. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Muniz-Orosco’s unexhausted contention that his conviction under Cal. Penal Code § 273.5 is not a domestic violence conviction. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceeding before the [agency].”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     