
    16918.
    Smith v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 1049, n. 82; p. 1050, n. 84; 17 C. J. p. 252, n. 16.
   Luke, J.

The evidence warranted the conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge; and under the facts of the case, and in view of the charge of the court in its entirety, the ground of the motion for a new trial attacking an excerpt from the charge of the court is wholly without merit.

Decided March 2, 1926.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Summerville— Judge Neal. October 21, 1925.

C. D. Rivers, for plaintiff in error.

J. F. Kelly, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  