
    JONES v. STATE.
    (No. 5247.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 22, 1919.)
    Criminal Law <£=1144(13,17) — Matters Review able — Presumptions—Record.
    Where there are no bills of exceptions complaining of any action of the trial court, its officers or the jury that rendered the verdict, or any statement of facts embodying the evidence, it will be presumed that proceedings in homicide case were regular, and that evidence justified a conviction and sentence of death assessed.
    Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. S. Anderson, Judge.
    Jesse Jones was convicted of niurder, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of murder and pursuant thereto is under sentence of death.

We have discovered no departure from the legal requirements in any of the proceedings. No bills of exception are found in the record complaining of any action of the trial court, its officers, or the jury that rendered the verdict, nor is the record accompanied by any statement of facts embodying the evidence upon which the prosecution and conviction are based. We must therefore presume that the proceedings were regular, and that the evidence justifies the conviction and the punishment assessed.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 
      ©=For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     