
    Charles Weiler, Respondent, v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company, Appellant.
   Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented on the ground that the court committed error in refusing to charge as requested; that it was plaintiff’s duty to look before'eross- ■ ing the tracks, and that plaintiff had no right to take doubtful chances as to whether or not he could cross in safety.  