
    Adams against Bayles.
    Tilt* couri will ijpt ouler a cause to be referred when it j's rqade to apr pparthat questions of law will arise in ^he cause.
    FOOT, for the defendant, moved that this cause boreferred, on the usual affidavit, that it would require the examination of a long account.
    
      Johnson, contra,
    read an affidavit, stating that questions of law would arise in the cause; and cited Lowe v, Hallet, (3 Caines, 82.) 
    
    
      
      ) Whore a motion to refera cause is repelled by an affidavit, that questions of law will arise, such affidavit must state what the points of law are, to enable the court to judge of the propriety of granting or refusing the application. Salisbury v. Scot, 6 John. Rep. 329. Where U question of law arises before referees, which is brought before file supreme court, and decided, they will order a special entry on the record, 50 as to present the same question to the court of errors. Gould v. Og~ dpp, 6 Cowen, 52.
    
   Per Curiam,

The motion must be denied.

Rale refused-  