
    Plummer versus Christmas.
    
      WILLIS executed a bond to Christmas, to secure a debt due to the latter, and gave him a mortgage upon a tract of land. About five years before the institution of this suit, Christmas assigned the bond to Plummer, who, being unable to procure payment from Willis, brought the present action to recover the amount.
    
      In the case of a paper not negotiable, the holder must apply in a reasonable and on failure time, and also give notice of non-payment in a reasonable time, thereof, if a loss happens, must sustain it.
   By

the court.

Where a negotiable paper is assigned, the transaction is to be regulated according to the laws of merchants; by which the assignee is bound to apply for payment within a reasonable time: and if that be either refused or delayed he must give notice to the indorsor, who is not liable unless these conditions be complied with. But with respect to un-negotiable papers, the law is otherwise, being constructed upon the principles of equity and natural justice; for it is right that he should suffer by the loss, whose misconduct has occasioned it. But where no loss really has happened, the assignee may recover the debt, although he has failed to give notice of non-payment in reasonable time. He may return the paper, when he cannot procure the obligor to pay it. In the present case, no loss of the debts which must fall either upon one or the other of the parties, has happened: for though the obligor is insolvent, yet the assignor is safe by means of the mortgage.

Verdict for the Plaintiff.  