
    KARREMAN v. KARREMAN.
    
    Divorce — Appeal—Evidence.
    A decree of divorce, based on conflicting testimony taken in open court, was affirmed.
    Appeal from Kent; Grove, J.
    Submitted January 11, 1900.
    Decided January 23, 1900.
    Bill by Cora Karreman against Adrian R. Karreman for a divorce. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Wolcott & Ward, for complainant.
    
      Gerrit H. Albers, for defendant.
    
      
       Rehearing denied May 2, 1900.
    
   Moore, J.

A bill for divorce was filed by complainant in this cause, charging extreme cruelty on the part of the defendant. The testimony was taken in open court, and decree rendered by the circuit judge in accordance with the prayer of the bill. The questions involved are purely questions of fact, the discussion of which would not profit any one. The trial court saw the witnesses. The decree is justified by the evidence, under the rulings of this court in the following cases: Warner v. Warner, 54 Mich. 492; Hoyt v. Hoyt, 56 Mich. 50; Whitmore v. Whitmore, 49 Mich. 417; Briggs v. Briggs, 20 Mich. 34; Whitacre v. Whitacre, 64 Mich. 232; Cooper v. Cooper, 78 Mich. 316; Be Zwaan v. Be Zwaan, 91 Mich. 279; Nicholas v. Nicholas, 50 Mich. 162; Kirkland v. Kirkland, 111 Mich. 166; Bailey v. Bailey, 121 Mich. 236.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.  