
    THE LICENSING OF TRANSIENT DEALERS WHO SELL UPON THE STREETS.
    [Circuit Court of Hamilton County.]
    August Brunner v. The Municipal Corporation of Harrison, Ohio.
    Decided, December 8, 1902.
    
      Transient Dealers — License for Provided in Tillage Ordinance — Discrimination — Restraint of Trade.
    
    1. A village ordinance which provides that “transient dealers” shall, before doing any business, obtain a license from the mayor, must operate uniformly upon those who form a purpose to undertake such a business before they enter the village, and those who form such a purpose after coming temporarily or otherwise into the village.
    2. A provision in such an ordinance making it “unlawful for any person while on the street, or traveling from place to place about the village, to sell, bargain to sell, or solicit orders for goods, wares or merchandise by retail without having first obtained a license therefor,” is an intolerable interference with and restraint of trade.
    
      Ben.'B. Dale, for plaintiff in error.
    P. W. Francis, contra.
    Gieeen, J.; Swing, P.-J., and Jelke, J., concur.
   The plaintiff in error was convicted and sentenced t'o pay a fine of one dollar and costs of prosecution for violating Section % of Ordinance 106 of Plarrison, Ohio, which provides:

“That every person who comes into this village temporarily in order to represent some business located elsewhere, and to solicit orders for goods either at wholesale or retail or t'o sell any such goods on commission, shall be held and deemed to be a transient dealer; and it shall be unlawful for any such transient dealer as above defined, to sell, offer to sell, bargain to sell or solicit orders for goods at wholesale or retail within said village without having first obtained a license from the mayor thereof.”

This section discriminates in favor of persons who form a purpose after coming temporarily or otherwise into the village, and against those who come temporarily with the purpose, of representing some business elsewhere, etc., and is an unreasonable exercise of the power granted to municipalities. Sipe v. Murphy et al, 49 O. S., 536.

It is urged, however, that the general scheme of the ordinance includes and applies to all persons within the village, and that Section 4 applies to any and all persons.

“Section 4. That it shall be unlawful.for any person while on the street or travelling from place to place about said village, to sell, bargain to sell or solicit orders for goods, wares or merchandise by retail without having first obtained a license therefor from the mayor of said village.”

Under this section if a merchant of the village should perchance step out of his store onto the street and “sell or bargain to sell” goods to his customer, or if he should move a few paces farther to another place and sell or bargain to sell goods to another customer he would violate this section of the ordinance.

Such result's would be an intolerable interference with and restraint of trade.

Judgment reversed.  