
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rubisel REYNOSO-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-10649
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Feb. 19, 2013.
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Rubisel Reynoso-Espinoza, Washington, MS, pro se.
    Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rubisel Reynoso-Espinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Reyno-so-Espinoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     