
    Simon Shinler, plaintiff in error, vs. Isaac Houston, defendant in error.
    
      -—Judgment reversed with a venire de novo by the Supreme Court; costs to abide the event.
    
    Gr. Stow and H. Hill, Jr., for plaintiff in error;
    J. A. Spencer and J. D. Willard, for defendant in error.
   This was a question of what constitutes a sale and delivery under the statute of cumbrous articles, (apile of lumber.) (Reported, 1 Comstock, 261.)  