
    Marlow & Brother v. The Hughes Lumber Company.
    "Where an affidavit to a petition for certiorari, sued out by a partnership, was made by one member of the firm, who deposed “that he is advised and believes that he has good cause for certioraring the proceedings to the superior court, and that owing to his poverty he is unable to pay the costs and give security as required by law,” there was no error in dismissing the certiorari on the ground that the affidavit did not show that the firm was unable to pay the costs and give the bond required by law. Code, §4056; Scott v. Turpin & Vollcer, 30 Ga. 964; Lester et al. v. Haynes-et al., 80 Ga. 120; L>rueker& Bro. v. Wellhouse & Sons, 82 Ga. 129.
    July 17, 1893.
    
      Certiorari. Before Judge Harris. Carroll superior court. October term, 1892.
   Judgment affirmed.

Cobb & Brother, for plaintiffs in error.

Merrell & Cole and Reid & Stewart, contra.  