
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Inoel Jedamin RODAS-DE LEON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-10574.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 26, 2012.
    
    Filed July 3, 2012.
    Bruce M. Ferg, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Rafael F. Gallego, Esquire, Gallego Law Firm, P.C., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Inoel Jedamin Rodas-De Leon appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rodas-De Leon contends that the district court procedurally erred because it failed to consider all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and did not consider De Leon’s request for a downward variance. The district court did not procedurally err. See United States v. Treadwell, 593 F.3d 990, 1013-14 (9th Cir.2010). The record also reflects that the district court did not give undue weight to any of the section 3553(a) sentencing factors and that, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     