
    In re HATCH. In the matter of the application of Metcalf B. Hatch.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 6, 1896.)
   No opinion. The applicant’s papers are defective, in that they fail to show that the applicant has practiced three years before the highest court of law in the state of Michigan, as required by rule 2, relating to the admission of attorneys. This proof mav be supplied.  