
    HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. SPECTATOR CO., Respondent.
    (No. 3.)
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    July 17, 1900.)
    Action by John E. Hollingsworth against the Spectator Company. From an interlocutory judgment overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to paragraphs 3 and 7 of defendant’s answer, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Henry T. Fay, for appellant. Franklin Bartlett, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in :he opinion in Hollingsworth v. Spectator Company (action No. 1, handed down herewith) 65 N. Y. Supp. 812, the interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs.  