
    (Reap. Dec. 9238)
    Leading Forwarders, Inc., et al. v. United States
    Entry No. 960079, etc.
    (Decided September 11, 1958)
    
      Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiffs.
    
      George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   WilsoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise, consisting of cashmere outerwear, manufactured by firms shown in Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, involved in the reappraisement appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is such or similar, and the issues are in all material respects the same as the merchandise and issues in Charles Stockheimer, et al. v. United States, etc., 44 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 92, C. A. D. 642, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.
That there was no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as defined in Section 402 (e), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the involved merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.
That the cost of production, as defined in Section 402 (f) of said Act, is the proper basis for appraisement of the involved merchandise, and that such cost of production for each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is as stated in said Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part of this stipulation, for the merchandise exported during the specified periods.
That the appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise on the invoices involved in said Schedule “A” for which no value is shown in Schedule “A”.
That the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, and that such values for merchandise exported during the specified periods, were as shown in said schedule “A.”

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all merchandise for which no value is shown in schedule “A,” to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.  