
    Laws v. Davis.
    (No. 21824
    Decided November 27, 1929.)
    
      Messrs. DeCamp, Sutphin & Brumleve, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Peck, Shaffer S Williams and Mr. Sanford A. Headley, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson and Allen, JJ., concur.  