
    [No. 17260.
    
      En Banc.
    
    January 12, 1923.]
    John P. Duke, as Supervisor of Banking, etc., Respondent, v. Harry Bolster et al., Appellants.
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered April 1, 1922, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover upon the superadded liability of a stockholder in an insolvent bank.
    Affirmed.
    
      Gordon & Nolte and Richards, Fontaine & Gilbert, for appellants.
    
      
       Reported in 211 Pac. 715.
    
   Per Curiam.

The issues in this case are the same as those in Duke v. Johnson, ante p. 43, 211 Pac. 710, the two cases being presented on the same briefs and arguments. In the Johnson case we decided that the action was properly brought by J. P. Duke, as supervisor of banking, and sustained a judgment in his favor.

Upon the authority of .the Johnson case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment in this case is affirmed.  