
    SAM HAYS v. STATE.
    No. A-2213.
    Opinion Filed March 20, 1915.
    (146 Pac. 1085.)
    APPEAL- — -Abandonment—Dismissal. AVhere the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, and no briefs are filed, or oral argument made, this court will make .an examination of the information, the charge of the court, and' the judgment, and, if no error is apparent, will affirm the judgment.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
      Appeal from District Court, Haskell County; W. H. Brown, Judge.
    
    Sam Hays, convicted of the larceny of domestic animals, appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Clark & Foster, for plaintiff in error.
    
      R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DOYLE, P- J.

Plaintiff in error and Charley Arthur were jointly charged by information with the larceny of eleven hogs, the personal property of one R. N. Robersan. A severance was granted, and, upon his separate trial, the plaintiff in error was convicted and his punishment fixed at a term of two years in the penitentiary. On the 19th day of September, 1913, judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict. An appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 16, 1914, a petition in error with case-made. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made for plaintiff in error when the case was called for final submission. The Attorney General has filed a motion to áffirm for failure to prosecute the appeal.

We have carefully examined the information, and the instructions of the court, to which no exceptions were taken, and the judgment, and, finding no error, the motion to affirm will be sustained. The judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

EURMAN and ARMSTRONG, JJ., concur.  