
    Ross v. The State of Ohio.
    (No. 23491
    Decided October 5, 1932.)
    
      Mr. Clyde W. Osborne, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. B. L. Thomas, prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day and Stephenson, JJ., concur.  