
    FLA. CEN. & PEN. R. R. CO. v. HAYS.
    August 3, 1896.
    Action for damages. Before Judge MacDonell. City court of Savannah. July term, 1895.
    
      Denmark, Adams & Freeman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Barrow & Osborne, contra.
   Lumpkin, J.

The questions -of law presented in this case have been -settled by repeated adjudications of this court; following the doctrine laid down in the case of Harris v. Central Railroad, 78 Ga. 525, the allowance of the amendment to the declaration was proper; the trial judge committed no error, and the evidence warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.  