
    No. 66235.
    Karl Schroff & Assoc. v. United States,
    protests 58/25409-10257 and 59/15587-10784 (Chicago).
   Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Marshall Field & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the merchandise was held dutiable, as claimed, at the applicable rates in effect on the respective dates of importation under the pertinent trade agreements.  