
    Hatem v. State of Ohio.
    (No. 21693
    Decided May 8, 1929.)
    
      Mr. Joseph L. Meenan and Mr. Vincent Tague, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. Emerson C. Wagner and Mr. John W. Dugan, prosecuting attorneys, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.  