
    CITY OF BAIRD v. WEST TEXAS UTILITIES CO.
    No. 25432.
    Supreme Court of Texas.
    Feb. 19, 1941.
    Scarborough, Yates & Scarborough, of Abilene, for plaintiff in error.
    Wagstaff, Harwell, Douthit & Alvis, of Abilene, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals to the effect that Articles 1121 and 1122 apply only to public utilities operating in one municipality. We express no opinkuTon the other question discussed by the Court of Civil Appeals.

The application is “Dismissed W. O. J. —Correct Judgment.”  