
    Randolph M. Valz et al., Appellants, v. Sheepshead Bay Bungalow Corporation et al., Respondents.
    
      Appeal — unanimous affirmance — constitutional question — motion to dismiss appeal denied.
    
    Reported below, 221 App. Div. 280.
    (Argued February 13, 1928;
    decided February 21, 1928.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 13, 1927, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
    The motion was made upon the ground that permission to appeal had not been granted. Appellant claimed that a constitutional question was involved.
    
      Bernard Sobol, Hugo Hirsh and Morgan J. O’Brien, Jr., for motion.
    
      Louis Marshall and Robert E. L. Lewis opposed.
   Motion denied, without costs, with leave to renew in connection with the argument of appeal.  