
    Oscar STILLEY v. Maurice HUBBS and Robert Garner; Patti Hill, In Her Official Capacity as County Clerk of Crawford County, Arkansas; Kenneth Chitwood, Bill Coleman, and Helen Campbell, In Their Official Capacities as Election Commissioners of Crawford County, Arkansas
    00-1141
    28 S.W.3d 857
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered October 12, 2000
    
      Appellant, pro se.
    No response.
   Per Curiam.

The appellant/intervenor, Oscar Stilley, seeks an expedited briefing schedule and decision in conjunction with the appeal of a Crawford County Circuit Court decision. We deny the motion.

The appellant filed his motion to expedite on Friday, October 6, 2000, and this matter came before this Court on the following Wednesday, October 11, 2000. The appellant has made no request for a stay, but asserts the following:

The county board of election commissioners is required to “prepare official absentee ballots and deliver them to the county clerk for mailing to all qualified applicants as soon as practicable before the last day on which the ballot will be counted but in any event not less than twenty-five (25) days before any election.” Ark. Code Ann. [§] 7-5-407. Mertz v. State, 318 Ark. 239, 884 S.W.2d 264 (1994).
By the calculations of undersigned, the 25 day deadline will not be passed if this cause is decided by October 12, 2000, same being a regular day of decision for the Court. Appellant prays that the scheduling order provide for the completion of this appeal in time for decision on or before October 12, 2000.

The appellant asks us to require the appellees to present a brief in time for the Court to consider this case prior to October 12, 2000, so that the case will be decided prior to the commencement of absentee balloting, which begins on October 13, 2000, for the November 7, 2000, election. To do so would not only be unfair to the appellees, it would also not give this Court the time needed for deliberation of the issue or issues to be presented. See Stilley v. Bradley, 342 Ark. 274, 27 S.W.3d 436 (2000); McCuen v. Harris, 318 Ark. 522, 891 S.W.2d 350 (1994). We, therefore, must deny the motion for expedited consideration.

Denied.  