
    .SHERIFFS — FEES', COMPENSATION AND SALARIES.
    [Guernsey (7th) Circuit Court,
    November Term, 1907.]
    Burrows, Laubie and Cook, JJ.
    GUERNSEY Co. (Comrs.) v. T. M. Thurlow.
    Sheriff upon Acquittal or Accused on Change of Venue not Entitled to Fees FROM COUNTT OF INDICTMENT.
    Where there is a change of venue and the accused is acquitted, the sheriff ■has no claim for fees, under Rev. Stat. 7264 (Lan. 11018) as amended, '•93 O. L. 7, against the county where the indictment was found; his fees in such cases being provided for by Rev. Stat. 1231 (Lan. 2606).
    i'l Syllabus approved by the court.]
    Error to Guernsey common pleas court.
    'C. S. Sheppard, for plaintiff in error:
    Cited and commented upon the following authorities: Slingluff 'v. Weaver, 66 Ohio St. 621 [64 N. E. Rep. 574]; State v. Meigs Co. (Comrs.) 7 Circ. Dee. 351 (14 R. 26) ; Kyle v. Greene Co. (Comrs.) 26 Ohio St. 46; Clark v. Lucas Co. (Comrs.) 58 Ohio St. 107 [50 N. E. Rep. 356]; State v. Hawkins, 44 Ohio St. 98 [5 N. E. Rep. 228]; Anderson v. Jefferson Co. (Comrs.) 25 Ohio St. 13; McClave v. Miller, '25 Ohio St. 14; Richardson v. State, 66 Ohio St. 108 [63 N. E. Rep. 593]; Columbus St. Ry. v. Pace, 68 Ohio St. 200 [67 N. E. Rep. 490]; State v. Dudley, 1 Ohio St. 437; Buckingham v. Railway, 10 Ohio St. 25; Robbins v. State, 8 Ohio St. 131; Dodge v. Gridley, 10 Ohio St. 173; Eggleston v. Harrison, 61 Ohio St. 397; State v.. Union Tp. (Tr.) 8 Ohio St. 394; Ross Co. (Comrs.) v. State, 49 Ohio'St. 373 [34 N. E. Rep. 735],
    Turnbaugh & Eagleson and A. M. Morris, for defendant in error.
   COOK, J.

T. M. Thurlow, the sheriff of Noble county, obtained a judgment by consideration of the court of common pleas against the board of county commissioners of this county for serving subpoenas and other services rendered by him in the case of the State v. Barber. Barber was indicted for a felony in Guernsey county and obtained a change of venue to Noble county, where he was tried and acquitted. Thurlow presented his bill for his services to the board of county commissioners of this county which was rejected, and an appeal was taken to the common pleas court; and that court rendered judgment in his favor for the amount of his claim.

Thurlow claims, that he is entitled to payment of his claim under Rev. Stat. 7264 (Lan. 11018) as amended, 93 O. L. 7.

The section as amended provides that,

“The cost accruing from a change of venue, including the compensation of the attorneys appointed to assist the prosecuting attorney, and the reasonable expense of the prosecuting attorney incurred in consequence of such change of venue, and also, including the fees of the clerk of the court and the sheriff, and the jury fees of the jury, * # * to be paid by the commissioners of the county in which such indictment was found.”

The part of the amendment specially relied upon is: “And also, including the fees of the clerk of the court and the sheriff, and the jury fees of the jury, * * * paid by the commissioners of the county in which such indictment was found.”

We do not see that this amendment affects the original enactment at all. The section as it originally read (Rev. Stat. 1880) was:

“And the costs accruing from a change of venue, including the compensation of the attorneys appointed to assist the prosecuting attorney, and the reasonable expenses of the prosecuting attorney incurred in consequence of such change of venue, shall be allowed and paid by the commissioners of the county in which such indictment was found.”

Under the section as it then read the matter was before our Supreme Court, Ross Co. (Comrs.) v. State, 49 Ohio St. 373 [34 N. E. Rep. 735], and it was held that the sheriff' of the county where the trial was had was not entitled to be paid his costs by the county where the indictment was found in cases where the state fails to convict; that the only compensation he was entitled to is the allowance provided by Rev. Stat. 1231 (Lan. 2606) which is payable out of the county treasury of the county where the trial is had. As a fact the sheriff had no fees or costs that he could claim, as the accused was acquitted; for in such cases the «court of common pleas, under Rev. Stat. 1231 (Lan. 2606), makes an .allowance to the sheriff for his services to he paid out of the county treasury of the county where, the trial is had. Noble county is making no claim, and very probably could not do so, as there is no specific provision of law under which she could make any claim.

The county commissioners did right in rejecting the claim. Whether the remedy by appeal was the proper one, it is not necessary for us to inquire, as.-defendant in error has no claim that he can enforce.

The judgment of the common pleas court will be reversed and the-proceeding of defendant in error dismissed at his costs.

Burrows and Laubie, JJ., concur.  