
    Jones against Smith.
    The act (seas. 41. ch. 55.) of the 24th of authorizing the commksToTeref did not supersede the com'missioners appointed by tnis Court,
    AN objection was made to the affidavit offered to be read . , . J _ , , „ m this cause, that it was not taken beiore a commissioner, appointed pursuant to the act of the last session, March 24, 1818, but before one of the commissioners appointed by the ri V/OUru
   per Curiam.

The act of the 24th of March, 1818, (sess. 41. c. 55.) authorizing the appointment of commissioners, did not supersede “the commissioners appointed by this Court. An affidavit, therefore; taken before one of those commissioners, is good, and may be read.  