
    14944.
    HENDRIX et al. v. THE STATE.
    The bill of exceptions not having been served as required by law, and there being no waiver of service, the writ of error must be dismissed.
    Decided November 15, 1923.
    Indictment for possession of liquor; from Evans superior court —Judge Sheppard. June 26, 1923.
    
      II. H. Durrence, 8. T. Brewton, W. G. Warnell, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      J. Saxton Daniel, solicitor-general, contra.
   Luke, J.

The defendants presented a bill of exceptions complaining of the judgment overruling their motion for a new trial, but the bill of exceptions, although property certified, has never been served as provided by law, nor has there been any waiver of service. It necessarily follows that the bill of exceptions must be and is dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  