
    CARL J. RAHM, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued June 2, 1936
    Decided October 2, 1936.
    Por the appellant, Joseph T. Lieblich.
    
    Por the respondents, Arthur T. Vanderbilt.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.  