
    On respondents’ motion to dismiss petition for judicial review filed January 22, 1985,
    and petitioner’s response to motion to dismiss petition for judicial review filed January 29, 1985,
    motion allowed, judicial review dismissed February 13,
    reconsideration denied April 5,
    petition for review denied April 23, 1985 (299 Or 118)
    In the Matter of the Compensation of Dewey C. Henson, Claimant. HENSON, Petitioner, v. MALARKEY ROOFING et al, Respondents.
    
    (82-09351; CA A31454)
    695 P2d 585
    Robert K. Udziela and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy, Portland, for petitioner.
    Jerald P. Keene and Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, Portland, for respondents.
    Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Respondents move to dismiss this petition for judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on the ground that the order, which remands the case to the referee for a determination of extent of disability, is not appealable. We agree. See Dean v. SAIF, 72 Or App 16, 695 P2d 90 (1985).

Motion allowed; judicial review dismissed.  