
    SEXTON against CRAMER.
    OH CERTIORARI.
    The action below, was brought by Cramer against Sexton, on the following state of demand:
    “ This plaintiff comes into court, and pleads that the defendant is indebted to said plaintiff, $25, by a defraud in contract, by a false representation.”
    The insufficiency of this state of demand was assigned for error.
    
      Read, attorney for plaintiff.
   By the Court.

The circumstances of fraud and misrepresentation should have been set out.

Judgment reversed.  