
    Submitted on briefs January 29,
    affirmed February 5, 1929.
    BARGE E. LEONARD, Guardian, v. IVAN KING and RAY KING.
    (274 Pac. 116.)
    
      For appellant there was a brief over the name of Mr. G. T. Haas.
    
    For respondents there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Winter & Maguire.
    
   CO SHOW, C. J.

The record does not present any question for determination by this court. It has been often decided that a question of fact once determined by a jury cannot be re-examined by this court: Const., Art. VII, § 3c.; Morser v. Southern Pacific Co., 124 Or. 384, 401 (262 Pac. 252); Crawford v. Cobbs & Mitchell Co., 121 Or. 636, 638 (257 Pac. 16); Thompson v. Larsen, 118 Or. 421, 428, 429 (247 Pac. 139). We are not justified in adding to the volume of decisions on that question. Our statute prescribes that the findings of a court in an action at law are equivalent to a verdict of a jury: Or. L., §159.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Affirmed.  