
    Mathis v. Weaver, executor.
    , while an interlocutory order for the appointment of a receiver is reviewable by the Supreme Court, a subsequent order made pending a writ of error in such case, supplying a vacancy in the office of receiver resulting from non-acceptance of the one first appointed, is not reviewable upon a fast writ of error.
    April 9, 1894.
    Argued at the last term.
    J. H. Lumpkin and Little, Wimbish & Worrill, for plaintiff in error. Blandeord & Grimes and Thornton & McMichael, contra.
    
   Writ of error dismissed.  