
    INGRAM ENTERPRISES and Aetna Life & Casualty, Appellants, v. Mark LANGSTON, Appellee.
    No. 92-2079.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 21, 1993.
    Pamela L. Foels of Zimmerman, Shuf-field, Kiser & Sutcliffe, Orlando, for appellants.
    Mark A. Zimmerman, Deland, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek a remand in this workers’ compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.  