
    DOYLE v. SEAWALL.
    A statement which was filed in the Court below, on motion for a new trial, and is neither agreed to by counsel or settled by the Judge trying the case, has not sufficient authentication to constitute any portion of the record which this Court can notice.
    Appeal from the County Court of Napa County.
    
      Hdgerton Hopkins for Appellant.
    
      J. Horrell for Respondent.
   Field, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., concurring.

This case comes before us on appeal from the final judgment, and from the order denying a new trial. The statement upon which the appellant rests, is the one used upon the motion, and this is not agreed to by the parties or their counsel, or settled by the Judges who tried the case. It has not, therefore, sufficient authentication to constitute any portion of the record which we can notice. The appeal is based upon errors which the statement discloses, and as these cannot be considered, the judgment must be affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.  