
    Baldwin, Appellant, vs. Fogo and others, Respondents.
    
      September 8
    
    September 26, 1899.
    
    
      Consolidated Milling Co. v. Fogo, ante, p. 92, followed.
    Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Richland county: Geo. Clehentson, Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      L. H. Bancroft, for the appellant.
    For the respondents there was a brief b j Prank W. Burn-ham and Fruit & Gordon, and oral argument by Mr. Burn-ham and Mr. J. J. Fruit.
    
   Oassoday, C. J.

The findings of fact, and the conclusions of law, and the judgment in'this case are substantially the same as in the case of Consolidated Milling Co. v. Fogo, ante, p. 92; and for the reasons given in that case the decision of this case is in favor of the defendants.

By the Ooivrt.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.  