
    STOREY v. STATE.
    (No. 7657.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 18, 1923.)
    Lewdness ©=>I— Single act of carnal intercourse does not constitute “living together” within statute.
    A single act of carnal intercourse does not constitute “living together,” within the meaning of the statute defining adultery and fornication, and is insufficient to support conviction.
    Appeal from Kaufman County Court; W. P. Williams, Judge.
    Walter Storey was convicted of fornication, and he appeals.
    Reversed and remanded.
    Gentry & Gentry, of Tyler, for appellant
    R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Upon information charging that appellant in Kaufman county “unlawfully lived together” and had carnal intercourse with one Billy Riggs, he was convicted of fornication and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50.

On the night of November 1, 1922, appellant went to the hotel of Fred Adams in Forney in company with Billy Riggs, whom he introduced as his wife. He reported that their automobile had broken down. He procured a room, and the two occupied it that night. Billy Riggs testified that she and appellant left Tyler together, and on their way to Dallas had car trouble and stayed all night in Forney, occupying the same room; that appellant had intercourse with her during the night. Her testimony is that this is the only time they ever stayed in Kaufman county, and that so far as she knew it was the only time appellant had ever been in the county. There is no evidence from any source indicating that appellant was ever in the county by himself or in company with Billy Riggs other than this time.

The state concedes the evidence is unsufficient to support the conviction. It is not necessary to discuss or review the authorities at length. They are to the effect that one act of intercourse does not constitute “living together,” in contemplation of our statutes, upon adultery and fornication. See Swancoat v. State, 4 Tex. App. 105; Parks v. State, 4 Tex. App. 134; Thomas v. State, 28 Tex. Cr. R. 300, 12 S. W. 1098; McCabe & Cordway v. State, 34 Tex. Cr. R. 418, 30 S. W. 1063.

Appellant’s conduct was reprehensible, and naturally was resented by Adams and his wife as an imposition upon them; but he was not guilty of fornication under the statute.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. 
      ©=>For other eases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     