
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martel ARANA-JAIMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-40254
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 19, 2016.
    N. Lee Tatum, Gainesville, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Martel Arana-Jaimez has moved for . leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Arana-Jaimez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Arana-Jaimez’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Arana-Jaimez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cib. R. 42.2. Arana-Jaimez’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     