
    (68 Misc. Rep. 283.)
    In re McCARTY’S WILL.
    (Surrogate’s Court, Kings County.
    June, 1910.)
    Courts (§ 202)—Surrogate’s Court—Settlement oe Case—Rulings on
    Facts and Conclusions oe Law.
    Under Code Civ. Proc. § 2545, a Surrogate’s Court may make findings ■of fact or rulings on questions of law on request therefor, on settlement of a case on appeal, at any time before the case is certified by the judge’s signature.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Dec. Dig. § 202.*]
    In the matter of the probate of the last will of Sara A. McCarty. Decree rendered.
    See, also, 124 N. Y. Supp. 1120.
    John C. Judge, for the motion.
    Everett Greene (Charles H. Beckett, of counsel), opposed.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes
    
   KETCHAM, S.

It is provided that, in this court:

“Either party may, upon the settlement of a case, request a finding upon any question of fact, or a ruling upon any question of law.” Code Civ. Proc. § 2545.

The proposed case has been presented, with the amendments proposed thereto, and the amendments and the case have been marked .according to the disposition intended by the court. Thereafter the appellants request findings upon questions of fact and rulings upon questions of law. It is contended by the respondent that such requests cannot be considered.

This argument can only prevail if it can properly be said that the ■ case on appeal was settled before the requests were made. The mere disposition of amendments or the correction of the case upon its face • is not the settlement. Strict practice—and this is a case for strictness— requires that the case in its final form shall be certified as settled by the judge’s signature.

The requests have been passed upon.

Decreed accordingly.  