
    Hood, Appellant, v. Norton.
    March 24, 1902:
    Argued Jan. 23, 1892.
    Appeal, No. 114, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from orders of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1892, M. L. D. 210, making absolute rules to strike off names of terretenants and to set aside the service of scire facias on terre-tenants in case of James Hood to use of Joseph Y. McCloskey v. Albert E. Norton, Mary S. Chain, Executrix of Hugh Chain, Jr., J. Catherwood Robinson, Lydia Smith, Augustus Sommers and Emma McClellan.
    Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Dean, Fell, Brown, Mestbezat and Potteb, JJ.
    Affirmed.
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The questions raised on this appeal have been considered and passed upon in the case of Hood to the use of McCloskey v. Albert E. Norton et al., January term, 1901, No. 111, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.  