
    On appellant’s and respondent’s joint motion for reversal and remand filed August 29,
    reversed and remanded for new trial November 6, 2002
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BEAU HASBROUCK, Appellant.
    
    219911673; A111619
    57 P3d 209
    David E. Groom, Acting Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Service, and Rebecca Duncan, Deputy Public Defender, and Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Erika L. Hadlock, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.
    Before Brewer, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Kistler, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant and the state have jointly moved for an order reversing the judgment convicting defendant of disorderly conduct and remanding the case for a new trial. We grant the motion.

Defendant waived his right to be represented by counsel during the course of trial. A jury found defendant guilty of the charged offense and a judgment of conviction was entered on August 11, 2000. The state concedes that the trial court accepted defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel and allowed defendant to represent himself for part of the trial without properly advising him of the risks of self-representation. See State v. Meyrick, 313 Or 125, 133, 831 P2d 666 (1992) (explaining the need for a trial court to ensure that the defendant “understand^] the risks of self-representation”); see also State v. Gross, 175 Or App 476, 477, 28 P3d 1243 (2001). We accept that concession.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.  