
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Manuel SILVA-QUESADA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-10142.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 25, 2010.
    
    Filed June 21, 2010.
    Erika R. Frick, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
    Erik G. Babcock, Law Office of Erik G. Babcock, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Juan Manuel Silva-Quesada, San Jose, CA, pro se.
    Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Juan Manuel Silva-Quesada appeals from his 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Silva-Quesada contends that the district court committed procedural error by failing to address his arguments for a lower sentence due to his “cultural assimilation.” The record reflects that the district court listened to the argument, and “then simply found the circumstances insufficient to warrant” a lower sentence. See United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050, 1054 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     