
    JACOBS v. ECLIPSE PAINT & MFG. CO.
    No. 11752 —
    Opinion Filed Nov. 6, 1923.
    Appeal and Error — Dismissal for Failure to File Brief —• Judgment on Superse-deas Bond.
    Where the plaintiff in error fails to comply with the rules of this court requiring the filing of briefs and said appeal is subject to dismissal, and where a proper motion has been made for judgment on a su-persedeas bond against the sureties thereon, and it appears that a supersedeas bond has been given, filed, and approved, and that the same'is set out in the ease-made, held, appeal dismissed for want of prosecution and judgment rendered against the surety on said supersedeas bond.
    (Syllabus by Lyons, C.)
    Commissioners’ Opinion,
    Division No. 2.
    Error from County Court, Tulsa County; W. B. Williams, Judge.
    Action by Eclipse Paint & Manufacturing Company, a corporation, against Louie Jacobs. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    James H. Wolverton, for plaintiff in error.
    Robinson & Mieher, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

LYONS, C.

The plaintiff in error has failed to file briefs as required by the rule of this court, and this cause is subject to dismissal.

The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss which is well taken. On April 24, 1923, it was duly ordered that plaintiff in error file brief on or before July 1, 1923. On July 9, 1923, upon stipulation of the parties, an order was entered extending the time to August 1, 1923, within which the plaintiff in error should file brief.

Plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file any briefs or make any showing, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.

Plaintiff in error has filed a proper motion for judgment on the super sedeas bond which appears in the case-made. This motion is also well taken.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and judgment -rendered against the surety on, the supersedeas bond, W. J. Mason, in the sum of $340.63, with interest from December 8, 1919.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  