
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ramon SERRANO-AGUILAR, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-30308.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 24, 2006.
    
    Decided July 28, 2006.
    Robert A. Ellis, Esq., USYA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Anne Walstrom, Esq., FDWAID—Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ramon Serrano-Aguilar appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the sentence for reasonableness, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 260-64, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and we affirm.

Serrano-Aguilar contends that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence by failing to address the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We disagree. See United States v. Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir.2006). (stating that the requirement to consider the § 3553(a) factors “does not necessitate a specific articulation of each factor separately, but rather a showing that the district court considered the statutorily-designated factors in imposing a sentence”).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     