
    BORDO, INC., David Vincent, Inc., and “John Doe”, Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BROWARD COUNTY, Florida; Broward County, Florida, a political subdivision; Ron Cochran, Sheriff, Broward County; B. Jack Osterholt, County Administrator, Broward County; John J. Copelan, Broward County Attorney; and Michael Satz, State Attorney, Broward County, Florida, Appellees.
    Nos. 93-2895, 93-2902.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 9, 1994.
    Opinion Denying Post-Decision Motions but Certifying Question Dec. 21, 1994.
    Daniel R. Aaronson and James S. Benjamin, Benjamin & Aaronson, P.A., Fort Laud-erdale, for appellants Bordo, Inc., David Vincent, Inc. and “John Doe”.
    David A. Wasserman, Casselberry, for appellants DMH, Inc. and “John Doe”.
    John J. Copelan, Jr., County Atty., and Anthony C. Musto and Christine M. Duig-nan, Asst. County Attys., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Bd. of County Com’rs of Bro-ward County.
    Robin S. Richards, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Ron Cochran, Sheriff.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hollywood, for appellee Michael Satz, State Atty.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See 3299 N. Federal Highway, Inc. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 646 So.2d 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

ON POST-DECISION MOTIONS

We deny all of appellants’ post-decision motions but certify as one of great public importance the same question we similarly certified in 3299 N. Federal Highway, Inc. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 646 So.2d 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.  