
    In the Matter of Daniel Enander, Petitioner, v Raymond E. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
    [760 NYS2d 480]
   —Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated December 28, 2001, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Paviola Soto, J.], entered September 17, 2002), dismissed, without costs.

The finding that petitioner used excessive force in making an arrest is supported by substantial evidence, including the hearsay testimony of a Police Department investigator relating statements by eyewitnesses that petitioner viciously beat the nonresisting complainant about the head with a radio or flashlight, and unrefuted medical testimony that the complainant’s surgically repaired multiple facial and skull fractures were consistent with multiple blows to the head and inconsistent with a fall (see Matter of LaFemina v Brown, 194 AD2d 405 [1993]). No basis exists to disturb respondent’s finding of credibility rejecting petitioner’s claim that the complainant sustained his injuries when he fell once off a curb during the police chase (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is improperly raised for the first time in reply papers (see Ritt v Lenox Hill Hosp., 182 AD2d 560 [1992]), and, in any event, assuming there is a right to counsel in this type of proceeding, lacks support in the record. The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892 [2001]), particularly in view of the recent discipline of petitioner in another matter for excessive force resulting in injury. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Williams and Marlow, JJ.  