
    DAN WARD v. STATE.
    No. A-3403.
    Opinion Filed Jan. 26, 1920.
    Appeal from County Court, Tulsa County; H. D. Standeven, Judge.
    Dan Ward was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and lie appeals.
    Affirmed.
    D. M. Martindale, for plaintiff in error.
    W.C. Ilall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Dan Ward, was convicted on a charge that in Tulsa county on the 28th day of September, 1917, he did have in his ppossession 22 half pints of whisky with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was on the 2Stli day of February. 1918, -sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period, of 60 clays and pay a fine of $100 and ithe costs. From tlie judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on June, 191S. a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. W-lien the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reason stated, the motion is sustained; and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.  