
    Dorothy E. Raynor, Appellant, v. Clifton E. Raynor, Respondent.
   Defendant’s remarriage, with its attendant additional obligations, is not such a change in circumstances as to justify a reduction of the amount of alimony. (Goldberg v. Goldberg, 265 App. Div. 946; Withowski v. Withowski, 271 App. Div. 901, affd. 297 N. Y. 626.) Appeal from order dated September 18, 1950, dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.  