
    
      In re Hatch.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    Oct. 6, 1896.)
    In the matter of the application of Metcalf B. Hatch.
   No opinion. The applicant’s papers are defective, in that they fail to show that the appli«ant has practiced three years before the highest ‘court of law in the state of Michigan, as required by rule 2, relating to the admission of attorneys. This proof may be supplied.  