
    Before the Second Division,
    September 7, 1938
    No. 39325.
    Protest 537064-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Hemstitched linen wearing apparel similar to that involved in Scruggs v. United States (T. D. 43850) was held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1017. Articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.  