
    (68 South. 135)
    No. 21080.
    STATE v. MEEKS.
    (March 22, 1915.)
    
      (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
    Criminal Law <&wkey;1114 — Presentation eor Review — Aotirmance.
    Where, in a criminal case, the transcript contains no plea, demurrer, motion, bill of exception, or assignment of error, and there is no error patent upon the face of the record, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed. State v. Johns, 49 La. Ann. 1250, 22 South. 328.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2918, 2921; Dec. Dig. &wkey;> 1114.]
    Appeal from City Court of Shreveport; L. C. Blanchard, Judge.
    John Bleeks was convicted of retailing spirituous and intoxicating liquors without a license, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Cal. D. Hicks, of Shreveport, for appellant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., Wm. A. Mabry, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.
   MONROE, C. J.

Defendant has lodged an appeal in this court from a conviction and sentence for “retailing spirituous and intoxicating liquors without first having obtained a license from the police jury of Caddo parish” ; but we find no plea, demurrer, motion, bill of exception, or assignment of error in the transcript, and no errors are patent.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.  