
    Marshall Investment Company, Appellee, v. D. F. McCoy et al., Appellees; Madison County, Appellant.
    APPEAL AND ERROR: Abstracts of Record — Required Time for Filing. If an appeal is taken more than 15 days before the first term of the. Supreme Court thereafter, an abstract need not be filed for said term, but must be filed at least 30 days before the next succeeding term, or the appeal will be dismissed.
    Headnote 1: 4 C. J. pp. 463, 470.
    
      Appeal from Maddson District Court. — W. S. CoopeR, Judge.
    March 19, 1926.
    Judgment was entered in this case on June 19, 1925. Notice of appeal was served September 5, 1925. The next term of this court began on the 22d day of September, 1925, more than 15 days after the service of notice of appeal. Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal because the abstract was not filed 30 days before the January term, 1926. —
    Motion sustained; appeal dismissed.
    
    
      C. E. Hamilton, for appellant.
    
      John A. & W. T. Guiher, for appellee.
   Morling, J.

In Mullinex v. Fairfield Nat. Bank, 201 Iowa 137, we said:

“Where the appeal is taken 15 days before the first day of the term, there is nothing in the statutes expressly or by implication prohibiting a hearing at that term; on the contrary, a hearing at such term is expressly provided for where the abstract is filed 15 days before the term. Section 12847,, Code of 1924.”

In that ease, notice of appeal was served less than 15 days before the next following term, and we held that the second term at which it could be heard would be the second term commencing 15 days ornmore after the notice of appeal was served. Following the reasoning of that case and of Hanson v. Hammell, 107 Iowa 171, we hold that, as the notice of appeal in this ease was served more than 15 days before the first day of the September' term, 1925, that term was the first term, and the January term, 1926, was the second term, for the purpose of filing abstraet. The abstract not having been filed 30 days before the January term, 1926, the appeal must be, and it is,— Dismissed.

De Grape, C. J.; and Evans and Albert, JJ., concur.  