
    The Security Bank of New York, Appellant, v. Herman Finkelstein, Respondent.
    
      Security Bank of Mew York v. Finkelstein, 160 App. Div. 315, affirmed.
    (Argued March 10, 1916;
    decided March 24, 1916.)
    Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 31, 1913, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict. The action was brought on February 19, 1912, to recover a balance upon a promissory note made by the defendant on January 3, 1905, payable on demand. The answer, inter alia, pleads the Statute of Limitations, which was the only issue tried.
    
      George P. Breckenridge for appellant.
    
      Charles Goldzier and Max Schenkman for respondent.
   Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.  