
    BEGONIA v. STATE.
    (No. 6022.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 16, 1920.)
    Criminal law t&wkey; 1090(1) — Questions relating to bills of exceptions not in record not reviewable.
    Questions presented in an amended motion for new trial, after conviction of forgery, referring to bills of exceptions as having been taken during the trial, cannot be reviewed, where the record does not contain the bills of exception.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Tar-rant County; Geo. E. Hosey, Judge.
    Frank Begonia was convicted of forgery, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Alvin M. Owsley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAvIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and allotted two years in the penitentiary.

There are a number of questions presented in the amended motion for a new trial. These grounds of the motion refer to bills of exception, which are mentioned as having been taken during the trial; but the record does not contain the bills of exception. Therefore we are unable to revise the matters specified. Nor does the record contain a statement of the facts. So far as the matters contained in the record are concerned, we find no reason why the judgment should be reversed, and in fact none of the grounds of the motion for new trial can be revised as the ease presents itself.

The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed.  