
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marvin Jamel FANTROY, also known as Seven, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-11194
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 16, 2014.
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marvin Jamel Fantroy, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
    Before KING, DENNIS, and •SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Marvin Jamel Fantroy has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Fantroy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     