
    No. 44150.
    Protests 907232-G, etc., of Taiyo Trading Co., Inc., et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham-ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.  