
    Rachel Rothstein, Plaintiff, v. Max Rothstein, Defendant.
    (Supreme Court, New York Special Term,
    February, 1903.)
    Divorce — Filing the interlocutory judgment — Code Civ. Pro., § 1774.
    An application for a final judgment cannot be granted in an uncontested action for a divorce unless it appears that the interlocutory judgment was filed in the office of the county clerk more than three months before the application. Filing the interlocutory judgment with the clerk of a particular Part of the Supreme Court is not filing it with the clerk of the court, the county clerk.
    That the interlocutory judgment was signed more than three months before the application is not sufficient.
    Akplicatiom" for final judgment in an uncontested action for divorce.
    Charles Frankel, for plaintiff.
    No appearance for defendant.
   Blanchard, J.

Application for final judgment in an uncontested action for a divorce, pursuant to section 1774 of the Code of Civil Procedure. I cannot grant final judgment in this case. Section 1774 of the Code distinctly provides that Ho final judgment -x- * * dissolving a marriage shall be entered * * * until after the expiration of three months after the filing of the decision of the court or report of the referee.” It is true that the interlocutory decree was signed more than three months ago, but it was not filed for the requisite period of time. I am not prepared to accept counsel’s statement that it was the error of the clerk of the Part that the interlocutory judgment was not filed. There may have been a fee chargeable by the county clerk for the filing of the judgment. Counsel should have been diligent to see that his interlocutory judgment was filed.. The mere receipt by the clerk having charge of the Part of the court where the justice is sitting of a paper cannot be deemed the equivalent of filing with the county clerk, who is the clerk of this court. Were it otherwise, a search in the county clerk’s office would not disclose the decree, and a party interested would have no means of ascertaining whether or not a decree had in fact been made. It appearing that the interlocutory decree was not filed until February 18, 1903, in accordance with the views expressed I must decline the present application for final judgment.

Application denied.  