
    Jackson, ex dem. Vrooman, against Smith.
    A judgment by default against the casual ejector, in ejectment, without pro-, viously entering the default for not appearing, is irregular.
    In this case the plaintiff entered a -judgment by default at the last term against the casual ejector, without having previously entered a default for the tenant’s not appearing.
    
      It was moved on this ground, to set aside the judgment, as for irregularity.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment was irregular for not previously entering the default of the tenant. Our rule is express on this subject, and the tenant coming in time it cannot be dispensed with.

"Rule granted with costs.  