
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Enrique GOMEZ-BRINGAS, aka Henry Gomez-Bringas, aka Henry Gomez Bringas, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-10416.
    D.C. No. CR-03-00077-JSW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 24, 2004.
    Hannah Horsley, Phillip J. Kearney, USSF—Office of The U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Barry J. Portman, David Fermino, FPDCA—Federal Public Defender’s Office (San Francisco), San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Enrique Gomez-Bringas appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea for illegal re-entry by an alien after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Gomez-Bringas contends that the district court erred in imposing a sentence that was not at the low end of the applicable Guidelines Range, because the sentence was based upon the impermissible ground of his prior arrest record. Because “[pjurely discretionary decisions authorized by the Guidelines, such as ... the choice of sentence within a guideline range, are not reviewable on appeal,” United States v. Khaton, 40 F.3d 309, 311 (9th Cir.1994), Gomez-Bringas’s appeal is

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     