
    The Mayor and Council of Waycross v. Neal. The Same v. Burdell.
    There being no motion for a new trial,'but a direct bill of exceptions assigning as erroneous a j udgment rendered by the presiding j udge without a jury, and the evidence not being set out in the bill of exceptions, and no brief thereof having been made and approved by the judge so as to make the same a part of the record, the evidence has not been brought to this court in the manner prescribed by law and cannot be considered; and the-error assigned necessarily involving a consideration of the evidence, no adjudication thereon can be had.
    April 30, 1894.
    Argued at the last term.
    J. L. Crawley, by J. C. McDonald, for plaintiff in error. Hitch & Myers, contra.
    
   Writ of error dismissed.  