
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Venustiano OCAMPO-TERAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-10120.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00212-LRH.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 7, 2003.
    
    Decided April 18, 2003.
    Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, the request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Venustiano Ocampo-Teran appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 71-month sentence for unlawful reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ocampo-Teran has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ocampo-Teran has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     