
    HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY v. DICKENSON et al.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 2, 1935.
    On Rehearing Aug. 4, 1936.
    See, also (Fla.) 169 So. 734.
    • John B. Sutton and Henry C. 'Tillman, both of Tampa, for appellant.
    W. B. Dickenson and Edwin R. Dicken-son, both of Tampa, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The bill of complaint herein contains allegations which if duly proven would sustain orders and decrees for equitable relief appropriate to the issues that may be made and determined in due course. Therefore, the decree appealed from, en-' tered November 24, 1933, dismissing the bill of complaint, is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

It is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

DAVIS, C. J., disqualified.

On Rehearing.

TERRELL, Justice.

This case is here on rehearing.in exactly the same situation as Hillsborough County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through W. T. Williams, as Chairman, W. T. Watkins, Charles T. Friend, J. W. Lester, and John T. Gunn, as Members of and Constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County, Florida, v. W. A. Dickenson, Julia I. Dickenson, and Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, a Corporation, 169 So. 734, decided this date, and being companion cases. The record and briefs of counsel have been examined and parallel questions are presented.

It follows that on rehearing our former judgment of reversal is rescinded, and the judgment below is reversed in part and affirmed in part on authority of the companion case here cited.

Reversed in part; affirmed in part.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

BROWN, J., dissents.

DAVIS, J., disqualified.  