
    HASLAM et al., Respondents, v. ABRA-HAMSON, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    May 1, 1900.)
    Action by William Haslam and another against Samuel I. Abrahamson. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Simon O. Pollock, for appellant. Joseph A. Kent, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant wholly failed to observe the requirements of sections 1429, 3029, Code Civ. Proc., as to posting notices of the sale. The judgment is therefore right, and should be affirmed, with costs.  