
    Eugene Wagner, Respondent, v. Obden Allemania, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term,
    April, 1911.)
    Evidence — Relevant — Introduction or use of whole conversation or instrument because of introduction of part.
    Where, in an action to recover- a death benefit, a certified copy of the proof of death of a deceased member of a fraternal society obtained for plaintiff by the president of the society who was also the undertaker at the funeral of the deceased member is offered in evidence by plaintiff to prove the fact of death which was specifically admitted by the answer, a statement in said certificate that suicide was the cause of death is an admission against the beneficiary.
    Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the 'Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, borough of Manhattan, sixth district, in favor of the plaintiff, entered by direction of the court.
    Clarence Alexander, for appellant.
    Samuel Ecker, for respondent.
   Page, J.

The plaintiff, as beneficiary of John Wagner, deceased, brought this action to recover $500 from the defendant as a death benefit. John Wagner had, sometime prior to his death, attempted to commit suicide; and'a charge to that effect was preferred against him in the lodge of defendant’s order, of which he was a member, and a committee was appointed to investigate the charge. The committee found the charge true; but, on the signing by himself and the plaintiff of agreements that in the event of the suicide of John Wagner they each renounced all claim to benefits which might arise by said death which otherwise would become payable to the plaintiff herein, John Wagner was rein-' stated. He died on October 28,. 1910, at Bellevue Hospital. On the trial of the action plaintiff’s attorney called Frederick W. E. Engel as a witness (Mr. Engel had acted as undertaker at the funeral of John Wagner and was also president of the defendant) who testified that he obtained for this plaintiff a certified copy of the proof of death from the board of health, for which service plaintiff paid him fifty cents. Thereupon plaintiff’s -attorney called upon defendant to produce this copy, and it was offered in evidence, the attorney stating that he offered it for the purpose of showing the" fact of the death of John Wagner, which was unnecessary to prove, as it was specifically admitted by the answer. Engel further testified that he sent the certificate to the financial secretary of the order. Plaintiff adopted this as his proof of death, which was required by article 7, subdivision 1, of the by-laws of the defendant. This death certificate contained the statement that the cause of death was suicide. Hemorrhage of medium basilic vein.” The only questions in the case arise from the admission in evidence of this certificate. A great deal of time was consumed in the court below upon attempting to solve the question whether Engel was acting as the agent of the plaintiff when he delivered this certificate or whether he was acting as president of the defendant. As the plaintiff adopted his act and predicated his demand against the defendant upon this certificate as due notification and proof of John Wagner’s death, according to the defendant’s constitution and by-laws, it became immaterial in what capacity Engel was acting when he filed the certificate.

It has been repeatedly held that such a certificate is not competent evidence to prove the cause of death, when it is offered by the defendant. Beglin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 173 N. Y. 374, and eases cited at p. 376. In this case, however, the plaintiff offered the certificate, and relied upon it as his proof of death; for no other proof of death was shown to have been given to defendant, without which plaintiff could not establish his cause of action. Therefore, the plaintiff relying upon this certificate as his proof of death, adopted the statement that suicide was the cause of John Wagner’s death, and it became an admission against him. Hanna v. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co., 150 N. Y. 526. Therefore, the learned trial judge erred in directing judgment for the plaintiff; for, if John Wagner committed suicide, under the agreement made by John Wagner and plaintiff, all benefits by reason of his membership in the defendant order had been renounced.

As there is to be a new trial of this case, we would suggest to counsel that there be competent common-law proof of the cause of John Wagner’s death, and it should be produced.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, ydth costs to appellant to abide the event.

Seabuby and Bijub, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed.  