
    10951.
    Cutts v. The State.
    Decided December 9, 1919.
    Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Terrell superior court—Judge Worrill. September 22, 1919.
    IF. H. Gwrr, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Castellow? solicitor-general, B. R. Arnold, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in the light of the entire charge and of the facts, and of the qualifying note of the trial judge to the first ground of the motion for a new trial, the motion points out no error which would require the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence authorized the conviction, the verdict is approved by the presiding judge, no error of law is pointed out, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, p. J., and Luke, J., concur.  