
    SERSION v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 27, 1912.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097*) — Appeal—Affirmance-Necessity of Bilis of Exception-Statement of Facts.
    Where the motion for a new trial raised questions which could only be considered in connection with bills of exception or statement of facts, the conviction must be affirmed in the absence of such instruments.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2S62, 2804, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Grayson County ; J. M. Pearson, Judge.
    Marie Sersion was convicted of theft from the person, and she appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of theft from the person, and her punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary. There is no statement of facts nor bill of exception. There is no question raised or attempted to be raised by the motion for new trial which we can consider without a statement of facts.

Therefore the judgment is affirmed.  