
    STORK v. STELMACK.
    Execution — Cancellation — Prior Execution — Satisfaction of Judgment.
    Defendants were entitled to cancellation of execution and levy against certain real property where plaintiff’s judgment had been satisfied by execution sale of other property, and plaintiff may not contend that previous execution sale was void because of foreclosure of a prior recorded mortgage.
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    30 Am Jur 2d, Executions § 721.
    Appeal from St. Clair; Miller (Alan C.), J.
    Submitted Division 2 February 6, 1968, at Lansing.
    (Docket No. 3,025.)
    Decided August 30, 1968.
    Complaint by Charles Stork against Stephen and Betty Stelmack. Judgment for plaintiff, and execution and levy against real estate. Motion by defendants to cancel subsequent execution and levy on other property. Motion granted. Plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Arthur M. Mann, for plaintiff.
    
      Nelson S. Shaperd and Harold N. Weler, for defendants.
   Per Curiam.

An execution and levy was made against certain real property of defendants for the purpose of satisfying plaintiff’s judgment against defendants. Defendants’ motion to cancel the execution. was gi’anted by the circuit court on the ground that the judgment had been satisfied by a previous execution sale on other property of defendants and from this ruling plaintiff: appeals.

A review of the briefs and record discloses that there was a previous execution sale to plaintiff of real propex'ty of defendants at a bid in excess of the amount of the judgment. Plaintiff’s contention that the prior, executioxi sale is void because of the foreclosure of a prior recorded mortgage is untenable.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Quinn, P. J., and T. K. Kavanagh and Corkin, JJ., concurred.  