
    No. 2.
    Domenech v. Rola.
    Appeal from the District Court of Aguadilla.
    Decided February 13, 1905.
    
      Mr. Franco Soto, for petitioner; Mr. Váz-quez, for opponent.
   Motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant had not complied with the provisions of section 51 of the Regulations. Motion dismissed on the grounds of the opinion in the case of Finlay v. Finlay & Waymouth Bros. Trading Co., 7 P. R. Reports, p. 546.  