
    [File No. 6519.]
    J. B. HAUGEN, Respondent, v. ARMOUR & COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant.
    (280 N. W. 204.)
    Opinion filed March 29, 1938.
    
      
      Fuller & Powers^ for appellant.
    
      Goodwin T. Wesllund and Oonmy & Gonmy, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The issues in this case are similar to those involved in the case of Olson v. Armour & Co., decided at this term, ante, 272, 280 N. W. 200. In all, four cases were tried and appeal taken by the defendant in each case. Appellant says that the ease of Olson v. Armour & Co. is typical of. all four cases. An examination of the record shows this to be correct. The same points are involved. The amount of damages allowed is the main issue.

This case, therefore, is controlled by the decision in Olson v. Armour & Co. aud-for the reasons set forth in the opinion, therein the judgment is affirmed.

Ci-iristianson, Oh. J., and Burr and Nuessle, JJ., concur.

Morris and Sathre, JJ., dissent.  