
    Lodowick Holmes JONES, applt., v. Harry T. RAMSDELL et al., respts.
    (Appeal No. 2.)
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth department.
    May 17, 1916.)
   The motion to ¡trike 1‘rom the files of this court respondents’ irief is denied. Appellant’s criticism is limited ;o the improper incorporation in such brief of ■ertain matter not used upon the motion at Special Term. As to such part, thereof the irief will be disregarded. No costs are allow-'d on tlds motion. All concur; Lambert, J., lot sitting.  