
    Before the Third Division,
    February 3, 1969
    No. P69/33.
    protest 66/20610 (New York).
    Argo Marine Supply Co. v. United States,
   Landis, J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel tbat the items of merchandise covered by the foregoing protest are manufactures of the United States, exported without drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296).  