
    Floyd L. Barlow, Respondent, v. Jacob Bauer et al., Appellants.
    
      Real property — easements — adverse possession — right of way by prescription over lands of defendant.
    
    
      Barlow v. Bauer, 207 App. Div. 157, affirmed.
    (Argued October 14, 1924;
    decided November 25, 1924.)
    Appeal from a judgment, entered December 4, 1923, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff adjudging that he has a right-of-way over the defendants’ lands described in the complaint, enjoining the defendants from obstructing or interfering with such right-of-way and requiring them to remove all obstructions therefrom. The complaint alleged a right-of-way, by prescription, from plaintiff’s premises over lands belonging to defendants to the State highway. The answer was a general denial.
    
      William A. Parshall for appellants.
    
      John Bright for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.  