
    W. A. Ransom & Company, plaintiffs in error, vs. Hannah Coleman, defendant in error.
    Practice in Supreme Court. From Muscogee. May Term, 1870.
    Chappell & Russell, for plaintiff in error.
    Farrow & Thomas; G. E. Thomas; Thornton & Spencer, for defendant.
   When this cause was called here, counsel for plaintiff in error moved to withdraw the record. Defendant’s counsel objected, insisting that the cause should be argued and decided. As it was not to reverse a judgment for money, the Court held that it could be withdrawn, and that if it were a money judgment, plaintiff could not withdraw without defendant’s consent, as she would then have a right to have the cause heard and ask for damages for delay.  