
    The State, ex rel. Binford et al., v. Lash, Aud.
    (No. 21389
    Decided January 16, 1929.)
    
      Messrs. Hemperly, Wiggins & Heggem and Mr. Franklin L. Maier, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Ammerman & Mills and Mr. M. W. Wend-ling, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.

Kinkade, J., not participating.  