
    Rafaela Trevino MARROQUIN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-71926.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 16, 2007.
    
    Filed April 24, 2007.
    Philippe Dwelshauvers, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Anthony C. Payne, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Rafaela Trevino Marroquin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of her appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal.

Petitioner’s contention that the Board violated her due process rights by failing adequately to consider certain factors bearing on hardship does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). We therefore lack jurisdiction over the petition for review. See id.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     