
    Lawrence v. Gardner.
    A minor’s agreeing to pay a note after he is of full age, which was given by him when under age, will support the action.
    The moral fitness and justice of a thing is a good consideration of a promise to perform it.
    ActioN on a note for £20 14s. upon interest, dated the 24th of April A. D. 1772.
    The defendant plead in bar — That at the time of mating and executing said note he was a minor under the age of twenty-one years.
    The plaintiff replied — That on the day of after the defendant had arrived to full age he acknowledged the justice of said, debt for which said note was given, and in consideration thereof engaged and promised that he would pay said note, if the plaintiff would forbear to sue him. To this reply a demurrer was given.
    Judgment — That the reply of the plaintiff is sufficient.
   By our statute no person under the government of a parent, guardian or master shall be capable of making any contract or bargain which in the law shall be accounted valid, unless such person be authorized or allowed so to contract or bargain, by his or her parent, guardian or master; in which case such parent, guardian or master shall be bound thereby. In this case it is not alleged that the defendant at the time of giving said note, was under the government of any parent, guardian or master; but only that he was a minor under the age of twenty-one years. The contracts of minors are not void, but are only voidable at their option, when they come of full age. The moral fitness, rectitude and justice of'a thing is a good consideration of a promise to perform that thing. Here the defendant when he had arrived to full age, acknowledged the justice of the debt, for which the note was given, assented to its validity, and promised to pay it.  