
    (99 South. 855)
    No. 26552.
    BARRETT v. DOBBINS. In re DOBBINS.
    (April 2, 1924.)
    
      (Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)
    
    Elections ©=>154(7) — Writ of review does not lie from Supreme Court to Court of Appeal in contested primary election cases.
    Writ of review does not lie from Supreme Court to Court of Appeal in contested primary election cases; judgment of such court in such cases being final and executory from notification. i.
    Action by James Barrett against Thomas J. Dobbins. Judgment for plaintiff in the Court of Appeal, and defendant applies for certiorari or writ of review.
    Writ refused.
    'Edward Rightor, John C. Davey, and Edward R. Schowalter, all of New Orleans, for applicant.
    By the WHOLE COURT.
   OVERTON, J.

The writ prayed for herein is refused, for the reason that a writ of review does not lie from this court to Court of Appeal in a contested primary election ease, and the judgment of that court in such cases is final and executory from notification.  