
    Van Huffel v. Harkelrode, Treas.
    (No. 22570
    Decided December 24, 1930.)
    
      Messrs. Snyder, Thomsen, Ford, Seagrave & Roudebush, Messrs. Fillius & Fillius and Mr. H. II. Hoppe, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. G. H. Birr ell, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. George W. Secrest, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is,, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Kinkade, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.  