
    Cincinnati Bar Association v. Hartke.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1214.]
    (No. 92-2530
    Submitted and decided September 9, 1994.)
   This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James R. Hartke.

The court coming now to consider its order of August 11, 1993, suspending respondent, James R. Hartke, Attorney Registration No. 0011584, last known address in Cincinnati, Ohio, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that James R. Hartke be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 65, 616 N.E.2d 186.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ:, concur.  