
    TREAT & al. v. McMAHON.
    In a writ of entry the Court refused leave to amend by striking out the name of one of the demandants which had been improvidently inserted.
    
      Crosby and Abbot for the tenant'd
   In a writ of entry on the seisin of the demandants and a disseisin by the tenant, Pond moved for leave to amend the writ, by striking out the name of one of the deoiandants which had been improperly inserted.

But thk Court, absenta Preble J. ruled that the amendment was inadmissible. Whereupon the demandants had leave to discontinue.  