
    Motion to affirm allowed January 21, 1919.
    VAN TASSELL v. JEFFERSON COUNTY.
    (177 Pac. 955.)
    Appeal and Error — Failure to File Abstract and Brief — Affirmance.
    1. Where appellant has not filed his abstract or brief within the time required by Supreme Court Rules 6 and 8 (89 Or. 712, 713, 173 Pac. viii), and there has been no extension granted or any exeuse offered for the failure, judgment will be affirmed on motion, as provided by Rule 16 (173 Pae. x).
    From Jefferson: T. E. J. Duffy, Judge.
    In Banc.
    On motion to affirm judgment.
    Allowed.
    
      Mr. Vine W. Pearce and Mr. Bert C. Boyles, for the motion.
    
      Mr. Lewis H. Irving, contra.
    
   PEB CURIAM.

This is a motion by defendants to affirm the judgment because of failure of plaintiff to file Ms abstract and brief, as required by Eules 6 and 8 of this court.

Plaintiff filed Ms transcript on appeal on August 16, 1918. His time for filing an abstract expired September 5, 1918, and there has been no extension granted, nor is any excuse offered for failure to file the abstract and briefs as required by our rules.

Defendants move the court for an affirmance of the judgment, as provided in Eule 16, and it is so ordered, with costs against plaintiff. Affirmed on Motion.  