
    The Electro-Pneumatic Transit Company, appellant, v. John P. Stockton, attorney-general, respondent.
    On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Bird, whose opinion is reported in Electro-Pneumatic Transit Company’s Case, 6 Dick. Ch. Rep. 71.
    
    
      Mr. Horatio N. Barton, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. William Y. Johnson, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, • Lippincott, Mague, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Krueger, Sims, Smith — 12.

For reversal — None.  