
    The Patrons of Industry Fire Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Watson H. Harwood, Respondent.
    
      Co-operative fire insurance — liability of a withdrawing member— how ascertained — when it ceases.
    
    When a member of a co-operative fire insurance company makes application to withdraw from the company, under section 274 of the Insurance Law (Laws of 1892, chap. 690), which provides: “Any member of any such corporation may withdraw, therefrom at any time by ten days' notice in writing to the secretary and paying his share of all claims existing, against the corporation and surrendering .his policy or policies,” there should be a settlement and adjustment between the company and the withdrawing member, and the liability of the member on all claims against the company, whether for loss or damage by fire or for accrued expenses, should be computed and included therein, and if he is liable for prospective (expenses of collecting an assessment for existing claims a reasonable amount should be added therefor.
    When a settlement and adjustment is made between the company and the with- ■ drawing - member, and his policy is canceled, he’ ceases to be a member of the company, and cannot he again assessed as such nor be compelled to pay any further claim for losses or expenses unless the settlement and adjustment is set aside for fraud or mutual mistake.
    Appeal, by the plaintiff, The Patrons of Industry Fire Insurance Company, from a judgment of the County Court of the county of Franklin in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Franklin on the 14th day of January, 1901, affirming a judgment of the J ustice’s Court.
    This action was brought by the plaintiff, a co-operative Are insurance company, against the.defendant, one of its members, to recover the latter’s foro rata share of an assessment levied bjT the company on November 25, 1899.
    
      Charles A. Burke, for the appellant.
    
      John I. Gilbert, for the respondent.
   Chase, J.:

The plaintiff is a co-operative insurance corporation organized pursuant to article 9 of chapter 690 of the Laws of 1892, known as the Insurance Law. In November, 1897, the defendant was the holder of two policies of insurance issued by said company pursuant to said statute and the by-laws of said company.

On the 3d day of November, 1897, the defendant received a notice of assessment dated November 1, 1897, on each of the policies held by him. The amount of the assessments was nine dollars and seventy-eight cents and twenty-six dollars and forty-five cents, respectively. He went to the office of the secretary of the company on November 5, 1897, and not finding any one in charge of the office, returned, and on November 8th again went to said office. The secretary was then absent, but the office was in charge of the secretary’s son. The defendant told the son that he surrendered his policies, and delivered the same to, and left them with, him, and there was then indorsed on each the following words: This policy returned for cancellation this 8th day of Nov. 1897, at 3"p. m. The defendant then paid the. amount of the assessments, and he testifies that the son said, “ There might be some figuring as to the rebate, but he was pressed — wished I would let it go — father would settle that.”. On the 18th day of November, 1897, said policies were canceled pursuant to statute and said by-laws, and the secretary of the company wrote across each of said policies, “ Cancelled Nov. 18, 1897,” and signed such statement as such secretary as follows : “ C. W. Pearl, Secretary.”

The defendant paid all assessments against him to and including the said 18th day of November, 1897. On the 17th day of November, 1897, one Wilson, a policyholder of said company, suffered a. loss by fire. On the 13th day of January, 1898, said company caused an assessment to be made for the amount of the Wilson loss,, and also a loss to one White, the date of which does not appear. The defendant was included among the persons so assessed. The secretary of the company notified the defendant of the amount, assessed to him. The assessment not being paid, on the 12th day of November, 1898, the attorney of the plaintiff wrote a letter to the defendant as follows : I have a claim against you for collection in favor of The Patrons of Industry Fire Insurance Company of Franklin County, New York. The company, as you know, has quit issuing policies, and some may think it a hardship to pay, but it is in condition to enforce payment, and if suit is brought fifty per cent, is added. I do not desire to bring an action against you, but will be obliged to do it if the account is not paid. They direct me to push it. The amount against you, personally, is.............. $5.86 As administrator, etc................................ 13.35 Interest on both from February 13th, 1898.”

Thereafter the defendant called on the attorney for the plaintiff and told him that he wanted a receipt that would clear him from further annoyance from the company, and paid him the amount of the assessment, with interest, and the attorney gave him a receipt in full therefor. The material part of the assessment of January 13, 1898, is as follows :

“Loss of Bro. Edward S. White................... $100.00
“ Loss of Bro. T. R. Wilson........................ 1,189.00
“ And expense of Company...............................
“Your assessment on Policy No. 246 on $850.00 is.... $5.95
“ Cancellation fee ........................... .25
“ Total...............................'... $6.20
“ The amount of return premium to the credit of said policy is.................... .34
“ Balance due............................. $5.86
“ Your assessment on Policy No. 639, on $2300.00 is.. 15.10
“ Cancellation fee.,............................ ... .25
“ Total...'................................. $15.35
“ The amount of return premium to the credit of said policy is........... 2.00
“ Balance due:..........................;. $13.35 ”

There is no evidence of any unpaid expenses existing against the ■company at the time the defendant’s policies were canceled:

Only part of .the persons included in the assessment of the 13th •of January, 1.898, paid their assessments. Expenses were incurred ■after January 13, 1898, and although the assessment was for the purpose oí paying losses, the officers of the company paid from the amount- collected from said assessment the expenses incurred after the date of said assessment, and the balance so collected was paid first. to "said White and next to said Wilson, leaving unpaid to Wilson between $600 and $700. Subsequently, Wilson sued the plaintiff for the amount remaining unpaid to him, and obtained judgment against the plaintiff for the sum of $694.02. Subsequently a payment was made thereon, leaving due to him about the sum of $500, and said company on the 25th day of November, 1899, made an assessment “ to pay judgment against company in favor of Thaddeus R. Wilson of about $700 for loss by lire, attorney’s fees and expense of collecting assessments and closing up the affairs of the company.”

The defendant was included in this assessment. He refused to pay the amount so assessed against him, and this action was brought to recover the amount of such assessment.

Section 267 of the Insurance Law provides: Every person insured in and by any such corporation shall give his undertaking in such form as the corporation may prescribe to. pay his pro rata share to the corporation of all losses or damages sustained by any member thereof. * * * He shall also pay such reasonable sum for policies and expenses and within such time as may be required by the by-laws.”

Section 268 of said law provides: “ If the directors or executive committee deem it to be for the interests of the corporation, they may'make an estimate of such sums as in their judgment will be necessary to pay all losses, damages and expenses for the current year * * * and proceed to assess, levy and collect the same of the members of the corporation.”

Section 274 of said law provides: “ Any member of any such ■corporation may withdraw therefrom at any time by ten days’ notice in writing to the secretary and paying his share of all claims existing against the corporation and surrendering his policy or policies.”

The by-laws of the corporation provide : “ Article VI. Each member of said company shall pay a pro rata share to said company within thirty days after being notified of the same by the secretary cf such loss or damage, and the amount to be paid caused by fire or lightning sustained by any member thereof upon the property insured by said company and of the expenses of the company in such manner and at such times as the directors shall order * * *. .

“ Article XVII. Any member of this company may withdraw at any time by paying his share of any and all amounts existing against said company and of the expenses of said company to date of withdrawal by giving ten days* notice in writing to the secretary and surrendering his policy or policies * *

The defendant in -making.application to the company for the policies held by him signed a writing in and by which lie covenanted and agreed to pay his just." and equitable proportion of all assessments made according to the by-laws of said association for the payment of losses by fire or lightning and conducting the business of said- association.

Every person upon signing an application for insurance and becoming insured in said company, thereby becomes a member thereof. On surrendering-his policy or policies he withdraws from the company and ceases to be a member thereof. The payment by a member to the company of his share of all claims existing against the company is a condition precedent to his right to have his policy or policies canceled and to his withdrawal as a member of the company.

When a member of the company makes application to withdraw therefrom it is necessary that there should be a settlement and adjustment between the company and such retiring member. The share of the member in all claims against the company, whether for loss or damage by fire, or for accrued expenses, is a matter of computation. Assuming that such member is liable for prospective expenses of collecting an assessment for existing claims, a reasonable amount could be added therefor. (Sands v. Boutwell, 26 N. Y. 233.) The statute only provides for assessing members. When’ a settlement and adjustment is in good faith made between the company and a member, and his policy or policies are canceled, he not only ceases to be a member of the company but cannot be again assessed as such, nor compelled to. pay any further claim for losses or expenses, unless the settlement and adjustment is set aside for fraud or mutual mistake.

. Hyde v. Lynde (4 N. Y. 387) was an action on a deposit note given contemporaneously with a policy of insurance by a mutual "insurance company. Before the expiration of the term of the policy tlie insured sold the property and thereupon surrendered his policy, and the secretary of the company canceled and .surrendered the deposit note. Suit was brought on an assessment which included defendant for losses which happened between the making and givIng up of the note in question and which at the time the note was given up was being contested by the company. The court say: <e Whether any losses or expenses have accrued prior to that time which have not been satisfied, and which the company has not got funds in hand to satisfy ;■ and how much, if anything, ought to be paid by the person insured, are matters to be adjusted between him and the company before'the note is given up. When the parties have come to an agreement and the policy and the note have been surrendered, the individual ceases to be a member of the company ; and all right to make assessments or calls upon him, or upon the note, is at an end. The settlement and surrender of securities are acts authorized bylaw; and, like, other lawful acts, they are binding upon both parties, unless they can be impeached on the ground of fraud or mistake.”

In Campbell v. Adams (38 Barb. 132, subsequently reversed on another point), which was an assessment made upon a premium note where the policy had been surrendered, the court say : The surrender of the policy by the defendant and its cancellation by the company, dissolved the defendant’s relation as a member of the company, and neither they nor their receiver had any further claims upon him, except for the unpaid balance of the assessment of December -31, 1855. (Mistake in amount paid.) The note was part and parcel of the contract of insurance, and with the policy constituted the whole of the transaction. One part could not be canceled and the other remain in full force without the consent of both parties.”

In Huntley v. Beecher (30 Barb. 580), referring with approval" to the case of Hyde v. Lynde (supra), the court- say: The assured had aliened the insured property and had surrendered his policy which had been accepted- by the company and the note was canceled and surrendered. It was held that lie was no longer liable upon his note for losses, though they happened prior to the surrender of the policy, &c., in the absence .of all fraud.”

In Mills v. Stewart (62 Barb. 458) the case of Hyde v. Lynde (supra) is referred to in confirmation of the statement, “ Yet it will not be pretended that a compromise made in good faith is not binding as well upon creditors as stockholders.”

The decision to the contrary in Sands v. Hill .(42 Barb. 651) was reversed in the Court of Appeals (see statement on page 19 of 55 New York), and on the second trial the agreement canceling the note even after a petition for the dissolution of- the corporation had been tiled was held binding upon the company and that the note was. thereby discharged.

The evidence herein clearly shows a full settlement and adjustment between the parties hereto, and in the absence of any claim or proof of fraud or: mistake the verdict in favor of the defendant, was right.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.  