
    (71 South. 190)
    No. 21772.
    STATE v. TUMINELLO.
    (March 6, 1916.)
    
      (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
    Cbiminai, Law <&wkey;1182 — Appeal—Reooed— Sueficienct.
    Where the transcript in a criminal case contains no bill of exception, and there has been no assignment of error, and no error is patent upon the face of the record, the conviction and sentence will be affirmed.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3203-3214; Dec. Dig. <&wkey;> 1182.]
    Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T. F. Bell, Judge.
    Charles Tuminello was convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors without a license, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Scheen & Blanchard, of Shreveport, for appellant. R. J. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., Wm. A. Mabry, Dist. Atty., and ,S. I. Foster, Asst. Dist Atty., both of Shreveport (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State,
   MONROE, C. J.

Defendant, having been convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors without having previously obtained a license therefor from the police jury of the parish of Caddo, or the authorities of the city of Shreveport, and, having been sentenced to pay a fine exceeding $300 and suffer certain imprisonment in the parish jail, prosecutes this appeal.

The transcript contains no bill of exception, there has been no assignment of error, and we find no error patent upon the face of the record. The conviction and sentence appealed from are therefore

Affirmed.  