
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Sergio PALACIOS-CERNA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-30049.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00079-BLW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 12, 2004.
    
    Decided Jan. 15, 2004.
    Monte Stiles, United States Attorney’s Office, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Leo N. Griffard, Jr., Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before BEEZER, HALL and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Sergio Palacios-Cerna, appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Palacios-Cerna has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Palacios-Cerna has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     