
    Francis Parow vs. James Cary.
    The recognition of an individual as an attorney of the court, before his actual admission, by receiving papers from him as such, waives the objection to his admission at the time of such recognition.
    
      Motion by plaintiff to set aside and vacate an order of Supreme Court commissioner staying proceedings and extending defendant’s time to put in special bail, for irregularity.—The grounds relied on in this motion are, that the defendant’s attorney was not an attorney of this court at the time he was retained by defendant in this cause, which was on the day of his arrest on the capias. Defendant’s attorney states that since he was admitted as an attorney of this court, his acts have been recognized and sanctioned by the defendant’s agent, and have been recognized by plaintiff’s attorney, and are so recognized by his papers for this motion.
    C. Stevens, Plffs Counsel. N. Bennett, Plffs Mty.
    
    H. H. Martin, Defts Counsel. X. D. Freeman, Defts Mty.
    
   Decision.—Motion denied, with costs.  