
    The State v. Lockstand.
    APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.
    
      Friday, December 23.
    
      L. Reilly, for the state.
   Stuart, J.

This case, like The State v. Hurley, is for retailing liquor; under what part or section of the liquor law we have not been able to determine. For the reasons given in that case and in Bratton v. The State, and The State v. Miles, at the present term, the action of the Court in quashing the information was correct.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.  