
    Rudolph HOLDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY; Harley Lappin; P. Guanja, Regional Director; A. Gonzales, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 06-6753.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 28, 2006.
    Decided: Oct. 10, 2006.
    Rudolph Holden, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Rudolph Holden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Holden v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02004-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  