
    Christopher v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company.
   Reargument of this court’s order (161 AD2d 274) entered on May 8, 1990 denied. Were we to reconsider defendant’s contention on the merits that the verdict is excessive, we would not conclude that the jury award to plaintiff in the sum of $275,000 "deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation” under CPLR 5501 (c). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.  