
    Bernard Vincent MONTGOMERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 03-40423.
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 20, 2003.
    Bernard Vincent Montgomery, pro se, Beaumont, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Bernard Vincent Montgomery, federal prisoner # 53653-146, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the validity of his convictions for methamphetamine manufacture, importation, and distribution. He asserts that his sentence is invalid in light of Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227, 119 S.Ct. 1215, 143 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999). Because Montgomery is challenging the method by which his sentence was calculated, rather than the execution of his sentence, the district court correctly construed his petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1001, 122 S.Ct. 476, 151 L.Ed.2d 390 (2001). Montgomery has not established that his Jones claim satisfies the test for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Jones, 526 U.S. at 251 n. 11, 119 S.Ct. 1215; see also Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, Tex., 305 F.3d 343, 347-48 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1241, 123 S.Ct. 1374, 155 L.Ed.2d 212 (2003); In re Tatum, 233 F.3d 857, 859 (5th Cir.2000). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     