
    Julius S. Gilman, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Isaac J. Oliver, Defendant and Appellant.
    It was decided in this case, that the fees of a stenographer, whose employment is directed by the Court, under section 256, of the Code of Proce- • dure, cannot be taxed as a disbursement in the cause.
    Heard, at Special Term, before Mr. Justice Monell.
    Heard, in General Term, before Bosworth, Ch. J., and Moncrief, Barbour and Monell, J. J.,
    March 8, 1862;
    decided March 29, 1862.
    See the point decided, in the index to this volume, under the title, “ Practice—costs.”
   See the appeal reported at length, with the opinion of the Court at General Term, in 14 Abbotts’ Pr., 174.  