
    DOERNER et al. v. LAYTON et al.
    No. 25662.
    April 16, 1935.
    Hugh . Ownby and Stuart & Doerner, for plaintiffs in error.
    Randolph, Haver, Shirk & Bridges and Duff & Manatt, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed which alleges that the same parties appellant herein are obtaining the very relief they seek in this court in the federal court, where a receiver is adjusting the claims of the parties litigant. This motion is not resisted. The appeal is therefore dismissed.  