
    Starsha M. SEWELL, M.Ed., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTAT, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-1919
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 22, 2018
    Decided: January 24, 2018
    Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Todd James Horn, Lillian Lane Reynolds, VEN-ABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.
    Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:'

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying three post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Westat, No. 8:16-cv-00158-RWT (D. Md. July 6 & 31, 2017; Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

AFFIRMED  