
    GEORGE D. ARGO v. STATE.
    No. A-4047.
    Opinion Filed May 19, 1923.
    (214 Pac. 1085.)
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Dismissal—Acceptance of Pardon by AppeJIant. When the pajrdoning power extends clemency, and the same -is accepted pending the determination of an appeal, the appeal will be dismissed.
    Appeal from District Court, Caddo County; Will Linn, Judge.
    George D. Argo was convicted of the- crime of wife abandonment after seduction and marriage, and he appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Morgan & Osmond, for plaintiff in error.
    George F. Short, Atty. Gen., and Leon S. Hjjrsh, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., fon the State.
   MATSON, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, George D. Argo, was convicted iin the district court of Caddoi county at the February term, 1921, of the crime above stated and punishment' fixed as above stated. From such judgment of conviction he appeals to this court.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that a parole has been granted by the Governor and accepted by the plaintiff in error. A copy of the parole and thel acceptance thereof by plaintiff in error is attached to the motion tol dismiss this appeal. When a parole is granted and accepted, and notice of that fact is brought to the attention of this 'court pending the appeal, the appeal will be dismissed. Noret v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 574, 179 Pac. 617; Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282, 187 Pac. 930; Brown v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 505, 184 Pac. 912.

The appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the district court of Caddo county.

DOYLE and BESSEY, JJ., concur.  