
    20970.
    Harlow v. The State.
    Decided December 19, 1930.
    
      P. Z Geer, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. A. Drake, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

While the evidence connecting the defendant with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Blood/ioorth, JJ., concur.  