
    LONG v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 25, 1913.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097*) — Appeal—Instructions — Review—Statement of Facts.
    Where there is no statement of facts, objections to instructions as not submitting the law called for by the facts, or as not properly submitting the law under the facts, cannot be reviewed.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §,§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dee. Dig. § 1097.*]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
    Ed. Long was convicted of murder in the first degree, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree; his punishment being assessed at death.

There are quite a number of grounds set out in tlie motion for new trial. Most of these are criticisms of the court’s charge as not submitting the law properly as called for by the facts, or properly submitting the law under the facts detailed by the witnesses. The evidence is not before us. There is no statement of facts sent up with this transcript. These matters urged in the motion for new trial cannot he revised in the absence of the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.  