
    32175.
    Mitchell v. Southern Dairies Inc.
    Decided October 14, 1948.
    
      H. A. Irwin, James II. Dodgen, for plaintiff.
    
      George A. Haas, Haas & Hurt, for defendant.
   Felton, J.

Where a person, is employed by a corporation for wages and, after the employee has earned wages under the contract of employment, the employer refuses to pay the employee the wages earned without legal process and in wanton disregard of the employee’s rights and against his will, the only recourse available to the employee is an action for a breach of the contract of employment, as the only duty placed upon the employer arises solely by reason of the contract. Code, § 105-101. See Manley v. Exposition Cotton Mills, 47 Ga. App. 496 (170 S. E. 711); Milledgeville Water Co. v. Fowler, 129 Ga. 111 (58 S. E. 643); Briarcliff Inc. v. Kelley, 198 Ga. 390 (31 S. E. 2d, 586); Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Spinks, 104 Ga. 692 (30 S. E. 968); Georgia Kaolin Co. v. Walker, 54 Ga. App. 742 (189 S. E. 88); City & Suburban Ry. v. Brauss, 70 Ga. 368; Fain v. Wilkerson, 22 Ga. App. 193 (2) (95 S. E. 752); American Oil Co. v. Roper, 64 Ga. App. 743 (14 S. E. 2d, 145); Howard v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 9 Ga. App. 617, 619 (71 S. E. 1017). Code §§ 66-102 and 66-9901, making it a criminal offense for an employer to fail to make the payments therein specified a penal offense, is solely and exclusively a penal statute and does not create a private or public duty outside of the contract. The mere refusal to pay wages by the employer does not deprive the employee of his property or -the right to earn a livelihood without due process of law.

Since this action sounded solely in tort for the amount of wages withheld and punitive damages in the amount of 85000, the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition and dismissing the action.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C. J., and Parker, J., concur.  