
    Minnesota Laundry Service, Inc., and Others, Appellants, v. Jacob Mellon and Others, Defendants; Charles Bartelotti and Others, Respondents; Meyer D. Siegel, Attorney, Appellant.
   Order confirming referee’s report modified on the law and the facts by striking out the second, third, fourth and fifth ordering paragraphs, and substituting therefor the following: “ Ordered that within thirty days after receipt of a copy of this order with notice of entry thereof, Meyer D. Siegel pay to the moving parties the following sums: (a) $3,094.36, the amount found due from said Meyer D. Siegel to said moving parties, with interest thereon from July 10, 1940; and (b) $439.50, disbursements expended by said moving parties for their share of the referee’s fees and stenographer’s charges, making a total of $3,533.86, with interest on $3,094.36 from July 10, 1940.” As thus modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant Siegel. The other items from which appeals were taken were disposed of by the Special Term and are disposed of by the determination made herein. The appeals in that connection, therefore, are dismissed, without costs. The account between the parties is stated as follows:

Credits to appellant Siegel:

Amount of judgment........................................ $37,569 47

Interest on judgment as agreed............................... 450 00

Actual disbursements made.................................. 820 37

Paid to moving parties out of collections....................... 13,163 00

Total credits........................................... $52,002 84

Charges against appellant Siegel:

Collections by settlement of original judgment...... $29,039 00

Collection by execution.......................... 168 00

Collection in second action....................... 3,790 00

Received from moving parties in escrow.......................

Amount of prospective disbursements included in judgment......

Unauthorized payments to sheriff.............................

To be applied on account of the judgment out of the $2,000 received on July 23, 1936..........................................

$32,997 00

20,000 00

850 20

250 00

1,000 00

Total charges.......................................... $55,097 20

Deduct total credits........................................... 52,002 84

Appellant Siegel should turn over to respondents........... $3,094 36

The testimony in this ease warranted the referee’s finding that Mr. Siegel was not entitled to any fee for the services rendered to the moving parties, other than the $1,000 which he has received. The Special Term had no authority to reduce the amount of the judgments obtained. E there were any error, it was judicial and not clerical. The court finds no real justification in fact for the statement of the Special Term that “ there were other sums paid by defendants to plaintiffs’ attorney, which he failed to credit upon the judgment,” and by innuendo that the conduct of Mr. Siegel was improper. The conclusion was reached owing to a mistake, partly induced by the confusion or forgetfulness of Mr. Siegel on the original hearing before the Special Term. He was asked with respect of six cheeks aggregating $875 when, as a matter of fact, those checks had been accounted for by deduction from the damages awarded by the trial court presided over by the late Mr. Justice Cropsey, and were not a proper part of Mr. Siegel’s account involved herein. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. Settle order on two days’ notice.  