
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Orisman Enrique RINCONES-ONATE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-14431.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 26, 2006.
    David Paul Rhodes, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before ANDERSON, FAY and SILER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

We note that appellant does not challenge his conviction, and it is accordingly affirmed. Appellant’s only challenge on appeal is that his sentence is unreasonable. First, we reject the government’s argument that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the sentence for reasonableness; that argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Martinez, 434 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir.2006). However, we readily conclude, for the reasons discussed at oral argument, that the sentence imposed by the district court is not unreasonable.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.  