
    The United Electric Light & Power Company, Respondent, v. The Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Company, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in • the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
    Eorster & Speir, for appellant.
    G. W. Simpson, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

In this case, although the contract was made in the names of Tiernan & S'omers, it was so made at the request of and for the benefit of the defendant, in order to enable it to get the increased discount. Credit was not given to Tiernan & Somers, but was given to the defendant. The earlier bills appear to have been paid by the defendant. This is not a case of one giving credit to a disclosed principal.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.  