
    The State Board of Pharmacy, Appellant, v. James Lurie and Abraham M. Stoller, Respondents.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term,
    November, 1908.)
    Municipal Courts — Procedure — Pleading — Leave to amend answer on sustaining demurrer thereto — Relief by one justice from terms imposed by another.
    In an action in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, after a demurrer to the complaint has been overruled with permission to the defendants to answer on payment of costs, it is error for another justice of the court to permit the defendants to file their answer and proceed to trial without paying the costs; and a judgment for the defendants, thereafter rendered, should be reversed.
    
      Arpead by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendants, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.
    Hieronymus A. Herold, for appellant.
    Rudolph Marks, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

This action wás brought to recover a penalty for the violation of chapter 667 of the Laws of 1900. The defendants demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. On May 13, 1908, the demurrer was overruled by one of the justices of the Municipal Court, with leave to plead over upon the payment of ten dollars costs; and the case was set for trial on May 21, 1908. The. action was, by consent, adjourned from May 21, 1908, to May 25, 1908. The defendants did not pay the costs required by the order overruling the demurrer and allowing them to plead over. When the action was called, on May 25, 1908, the defendants were permitted by another justice of the court, against the objection and exception of the plaintiff, to file their answer to the complaint and proceed to trial without paying the costs previously imposed. The defendants’ demurrer having been overruled, judgment could have been entered against them, except for the permission which the court gave them to plead over. This permission was granted upon the express condition that the defendants pay the plaintiff ten dollars costs. The defendants had no right to avail themselves of this permission, unless they complied with the conditions imposed.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, provided that the defendants pay to the plaintiff,, within five days from the service of a copy of the order entered upon this decision, the sum of ten dollars costs. If the defendants shall not comply with the provisions of this order, the answer should be stricken out and judgment absolute entered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount to which it was entitled under the complaint or proof, with appropriate costs in the court below and costs of this appeal.

Present: Gildersleeve, MacLean and Seabury, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, provided that defendants pay to plaintiff, within five days from service of copy of order, the sum of ten dollars costs. If defendants shall not comply with order, answer stricken out, and judgment absolute in favor of plaintiff.  