
    Preacherman L. O’Stjud HAKIMU, aka Larry Louis Judge, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICIALS, FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 02-56942.
    D.C. No. CV-02-06396-CBM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 10, 2003.
    
    Decided Nov. 13, 2003.
    Preacherman L. O’Stjud Hakimu, pro se, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Before KOZINSKI, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Preacherman L. O’Stjud Hakimu, a/k/a Larry Louis Judge, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his application for leave to file this action without prepayment of the full filing fee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, and we affirm. Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369-70 (9th Cir.1987) (“A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.”).

We deny all pending motions.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     