
    Garland A. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-17060
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted February 13, 2018 
    
    Filed February 23, 2018
    Garland A. Jones, Pro Se
    Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and ' MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Garland A. Jones, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment. We dismiss this appeal for lack jurisdiction because Jones failed to appeal timely from the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment. See Fed. R; App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 209, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007) (timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional); see also Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) (inmate’s notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institution’s internal mail system if accompanied by supporting declaration or evidence); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 273, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (pro se prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed when delivered to the prison authorities for forwarding to the court).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     