
    Thomas H. Wilson, Respondent, v. Charles Green, Appellant.
   Per Curiam.

In view of the conflict in the evidence it was error for the court to charge the jury that the plaintiff had the right of way as matter of law; and there were other prejudicial errors requiring reversal. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur. Judgment and order reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.  