
    JAMES STRONG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWIN A. GASKILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    ■On error to the Burlington Circuit.
    Eor the plaintiffs in error, IAndley M. Garrison.
    
    For the defendants in error, David J. Pancoast.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Scudder, Van Syckel, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 8.

For reversal—Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Reed. 4.  