
    Thomas NAUMAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 67841.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 27, 1996.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1996.
    Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  