
    STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James H. McKINNEY, Defendant/Appellant. James H. McKINNEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 67992, 69880.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 12, 1996.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1997.
    Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Cheryl A. Caponegro, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of two counts of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994. The court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to two consecutive twenty-five year prison terms. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant does not address any points in his appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Therefore, that appeal is considered abandoned. See State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).  