
    Raymond Harewood, Appellant, v Ronica Aiken, Respondent.
    Submitted December 18, 2000;
    decided February 8, 2001
   Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as effectively denied appellant’s motion for renewal, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.  