
    APRIL TERM, 1763.
    Lib. D. D. No. 3. fol. 519.
    Johannes Arrants against Roger Dumagin.
   THIS was an appeal from Cecil County Court. By the record it appears that an attachment against the defendant, an absconding debtor, issued on a warrant of a J ustice of the County, upon an account for fees due the plaintiff as sheriff of the County. The attachment was laid upon the real and personal property of the defendant. The County Court, on motion of the defendant, ordered the writ of attachment to be quashed.

The Provincial Court affirmed the judgment of die County Court.  