
    Jay Willfred Co. et al. v. United States
    No. 7563.
    Entry No. 743934, etc.
    Invoices dated Birmingham, England, February 15, 1946, etc.
    Certified February 15, 1946, etc.
    Entered at New York, N. Y., March 8, 1946, etc.
    
      (Decided March 10, 1948)
    
      Siegel, Madnell & Davidson for the plaintiffs.
    
      Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein, the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in the reappraisements listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, are the same in all material respects as in the case of United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importers by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equaL the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.  