
    Hillsman vs. The State of Georgia.
    1. An indictment which charged that the defendant broke and entered the storehouse of a person named with intent to steal therefrom thirty dollars in money therein found, of’ the value of thirty dollars, and the property of the owner of the storehouse, was not demurrable for want of a more accurate description of the kind of money so to be stolen. Code, §4628; 1 Wharton Crim. Law, 320; 2 Bish. Crlm. Proc., 142, 145; 2 Arch. Plead. and Prac., 1072-3.
    
      (a.) Is any description of the goods intended to be taken from the house where things of value are stored necessary ? Quczre. 54 Ga., 106.
    2. The verdict is supported by the evidence.
    Jackson, Chief Justice.
     