
    Commonwealth ex rel. Schwartz, (et al., Appellant), v. Schwartz.
    Argued March 13, 1946.
    Before Baldrige, P. J., Rhodes, Hirt, Reno, Dithhich, Ross and Arnold, JJ.
    
      George H. Class, with him vanBoden & Lindenmuth, for appellant.
    
      Donald H. Hamilton, with him Edward D. McLaughlin, for appellee.
    April 10, 1946:
   Per Curiam,

This case involves the custody of a minor child. The boy in question, five years of age, was given to the mother, subject to the right of the father to have his son at certain intervals. The parties had a full and fair hearing before Judge Sweney, who evidently gave careful consideration to the contentions of the respective parties before reaching a conclusion.

We find no reason for disturbing his action. Order of the court below is affirmed at appellant’s costs.  