
    Earnest A. BALLE, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. MARTIN’S SEAFOOD RESTAURANT d/b/a Sherry’s Restaurant, Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.
    No. 34641.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 9, 1966.
    Williams & Jabara, Miami, for petitioner and cross-respondent.
    Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant and Charles T. Kessler, Fort Lau-derdale, for Federated Mut. Implement & Hardware Ins. Co., respondent, cross-petitioner.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed' with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of attorney’s fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

THORNAL, C. J., dissents.  