
    BSL INVESTMENTS, II, LLC, f.k.a. Fresh Frozen Foods, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRESH FROZEN FOODS, INC., f.k.a. FFF Acquisition Sub, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-14255 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (March 1, 2017)
    Adeyemi 0. Adenrele, Barnes & Thorn-burg, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Thomas Joseph Gallo, John W. Mills, Kara Cleary, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant
    Mark Allen Nadeau, Cole Schlabach, DLA Piper LLP (US), Phoenix, AZ, Christopher Grey Campbell, James Michael Ru-sert, DLA Piper LLP (US), Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee
    Michael James King, Greenberg Trau-rig, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for U.S. Bank National Association
    Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

This is a contract dispute arising from an escrow agreement between BSL Investments and Fresh Frozen Foods. BSL filed a complaint in district court seeking a declaratory judgment that, among other things, Fresh Frozen Foods is not entitled to escrow funds governed by the agreement. The district court granted summary judgment to Fresh Frozen Foods. The court found that Fresh Frozen Foods requested access to the escrow funds as indemnification for damages it suffered from dealings with BSL; BSL failed to timely dispute the request; and under the plain language of the escrow agreement, BSL’s failure waived BSL’s right to contest the request. BSL appeals the district court’s summary judgment decision.

After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm substantially for reasons set forth in the district court’s thorough opinion. See BSL Investments, II, LLC v. Fresh Frozen Foods, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-02136 (N.D. Ga. June 16, 2016).

AFFIRMED.  