
    Conrad METZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 63249.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Feb. 8, 2005.
    Rebecca L. Kurz, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before: NEWTON, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HOLLIGER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-Appellant Conrad Metz appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no reversible error, this court affirms the denial of the post-trial motion. Because a published opinion reciting the facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, this court affirms by summary order under Rule 84.16(b).

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).  