
    Edward K. Clark, App’lt, v. City of Binghamton et al., Resp’ts.
    Sup. Ct., 4D.
    February Term, 1895.
   No opinion. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the plaintiff’s qualified assent to the paper signed by the other property owners on Front street did not operate as a dedication of the plaintiff’s property that was within the lines of the proposed addition to such street.  