
    Before the Second Division,
    August 24, 1951
    No. 55834.
    protests 114645-K, etc. (New York).
    R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise in question consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of United States v. Helbros Watch Co. et al. (38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at the base rate of $1.20 each as watch movements more than %o of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, supra.  