
    Swift v. Security Investment Company et al.
    
    Argued January 10,
    Decided January 29, 1901.
   Fish, J.

In view of the pleadings and evidence appearing in the record, it does not appear that there was any abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Lumpkin. Eulton superior court. June 27, 1900.

W. H. Terrell and S. C. Tapp, for plaintiff.

King & Anderson and Tompkins & Alston, for defendants.  