
    Brinson vs. The State of Georgia.
    1. The evidence was conflicting, and there was enough to support the verdict.
    2. If a pistol he carried concealed hut for a moment, it is a violation of the law. 46 6a., 292.
    Judgment affirmed.
    February 17, 1886.
   Blandeord, Justice.

[Brinson was indicted for having and carrying about his person a pistol concealed. The evidence was conflicting. The court charged that if the pistol was concealed but for a moment, it was a violation of the law. The defendant ivas found guilty. He moved for a new trial, which was refused, and he excepted.] • '  