
    14284
    BOYKIN, CONSERVATOR OF THE BANK OF CAMDEN v. SHANNON
    (185 S. E., 926)
    September, 1935.
    
      Messrs. Nelson, Mullins & Grier and Murdoch M. Johnson, for appellant.
    
      Messrs. Wittkowsky & Wittkowsky, for respondent.
    April 27, 1936.
   Per curiam.

The cardinal facts of this case and the procedure adopted are identical with the case of Boykin, Conservator, v. Zemp, reported in 179 S. C., 257, 184 S. E., 573.

It is admitted by respondent that the Zemp case just above referred to is controlling.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the complaint dismissed.  