
    Sarojini DARAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey J. PTAK, M.D., P.C., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-2887.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 20, 2018.
    Filed: March 7, 2013.
    Sarojini Daram, Minneapolis, MN, pro se.
    John Michael Degnan, Jessica Jean Stomski, Briggs & Morgan, Minneapolis, MN, Peter G. Kline, Crawford & Kline, Tempe, AZ, for Defendani>-Appellee.
    Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Sarojini Daram appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint as subject to claim preclusion under Arizona law. Upon our careful review, see C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Lobrano, 695 F.3d 758, 763 (8th Cir.2012) (de novo review of grant of motion to dismiss based on res judicata); David v. Tanksley, 218 F.3d 928, 930 (8th Cir.2000) (de novo review of district court’s interpretation of state law), we affirm for the reasons provided by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
     