
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David James GARRISON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-50456.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted July 8, 2014.
    Filed July 22, 2014.
    Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Jonathan Baum, Trial, David Lee Kirman, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Ellen Meltzer, Special Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, DC, James I. Pearce, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    Karyn H. Bucur, Esquire, Karyn H. Bu-cur Attorney at Law, Laguna Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Defendant David James Garrison appeals his convictions by jury for health care fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1847, and conspiracy to commit health care fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349. He also appeals his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

There was sufficient evidence that Garrison knowingly and willfully defrauded Medicare. Garrison admitted that he saw copies of his patients’ Medicare cards. He filled out and signed ten Medicare “super-bills” for billing patient visits to Medicare. He was familiar with the Medicare requirements for power wheelchairs. And at least some of the prescriptions Garrison filled out for power wheelchairs identified the “Medicare Allowance” for each wheelchair component. Viewing this evidence in' the light most favorable to the government, a rational jury could have concluded that Garrison knew Medicare was the victim of his fraud. See United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1161 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc).

The district court did not err by applying a two-level sentencing enhancement under § 3B1.3 of the Sentencing Guidelines for Garrison’s abuse of a position of trust. Whether a defendant occupies a position of trust is a question of law reviewed de novo. United States v. Laurienti 731 F.3d 967, 973 (9th Cir.2013). A district court’s application of § 3B1.3 to the facts is reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kimbrew, 406 F.3d 1149, 1151 (9th Cir.2005). Garrison, a physician assistant, stepped into the shoes of a physician — a Medicare provider — by issuing medically unjustified prescriptions without authorization from a supervising physician. See United States v. Rutgard, 116 F.3d 1270, 1293 (9th Cir.1997) (affirming the application of a § 3B1.1 sentencing enhancement to a doctor who submitted false claims to Medicare because “the government as insurer depends upon the honesty of the doctor and is easily taken advantage of if the doctor is not honest.”). Garrison therefore abused the government’s trust by issuing fraudulent power wheelchair prescriptions that significantly facilitated the commission of Medicare fraud. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     