
    On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed March 19,
    reconsideration allowed; former opinion (221 Or App 227, 190 P3d 387 (2008)) modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn; affirmed May 27, 2009
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAYMOND LEONARD PAWLOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
    
    Marion County Circuit Court
    05C44149; A129038
    209 P3d 381
    John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, for petition.
    Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case. In that decision, we concluded that, based on the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Ice, 343 Or 248, 170 P3d 1049 (2007), rev’d and rent’d, 555 US_, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009), the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences based on its own findings of fact was plain error. The state now argues that, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s reversal of the Oregon court’s decision, we should reconsider. We agree. Under the United States Supreme Court’s decision, the imposition of consecutive sentences was not error.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn; affirmed.  