
    [No. 21705.
    Department One.
    July 25, 1929.]
    Fred M. Williams, Appellant, v. L. G. Bevis et al., Respondents.
      
    
    
      Dan Danielson, for appellant.
    
      W. W. Clarke, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 279 Pac. 1119.
    
   Pee Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of Williams v. Bevis, 152 Wash. 469, 278 Pac. 193, and the facts in the two cases being practically identical, for the reasons stated in the opinion above cited the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.

Holcomb, J., dissents.  