
    SEABOARD AIR LINE RY. CO. v. MOORE.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    February 27, 1912.)
    No. 2,221.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida.
    Peter O. Knight and J. F. Glen, for plaintiff in error.
    Hilton S. Hampton, A. H. King, and Geo. C. Bedell, for defendant in error.
    Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The constitutionality and applicability of the act of Congress relating to the liability of common carriers by railroad to their employes, approved April 22, 1908 (35 Stat. pt. 1, p. 65, c. 149 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1171]), have been passed upon in a recent decision of the Supreme Court in Mondou v. New York, N. H. & Hartford R. R. Co., 223 U. S. 1, 32 Sup. Ct. 169, 56 L. Ed.-, handed down January 15, 1012, not yqt officially reported. According to this decision, the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth,"' ninth, and fifteenth assignments of error herein are clearly not sustainable. From an examination of the transcript and briefs, the assignments of error concerning other matters are not well taken. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.  