
    JONES, Appellant, v. TOWN OF LOWVILLE, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 27, 1908.)
    Action by Emma D. Jones against the town of Lowville.
   PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in setting aside the verdict on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence.

MCLENNAN, P. J„ and WILLIAMS, J., concur on the additional ground that the verdict is contrary to law.  