
    Roy Baughman v. The State.
    No. 6839.
    Decided March 15, 1922.
    Intoxicating Liquors—Possession.
    Where the indictment alleged the possession or intoxicating liquor, but failed to allege that the same was for the purpose of sale, the judgment must be reversed and the cause dismissed.
    Appeal from the District Court of Cottle. Tried below before the Honorable J. H. Milam.
    Appeal from a conviction of the unlawful possession of liquor ; penalty, one year imprisonment in the penitentiary.
    The opinion states the case.
    
      W. A. Williams, for appellant.
    
      R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   HAWKINS, Judge.

—Conviction was for- the possession of intoxicating liquor. The prosecution arose under the state-wide prohibition law prior to the amendment thereof' by the 37th Legislature which in effect repealed that portion of the law under which the prosecution proceeded. The indictment alleges the possession of intoxicating liquor not for medicinal, mechanical, scientific or sacramental purposes, while under the amendment it is not unlawful to possess liquor unless for the purpose of sale.

Under many cases decided by the court since the amendment it becomes necessary to reverse the iudgment of the trial court and order the prosecution dismissed under the present indictment.

Reversed and remanded.  