
    Johnathan Johnson, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.
    [33 NYS3d 784]
   Lahtinen, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (DeBow, J.), entered April 23, 2015, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim.

In 2009, claimant, an inmate at Upstate Correctional Facility, filed a claim alleging that he had been denied certain prescribed medication and access to his legal mail and that he had repeatedly been served rice cakes that tasted bitter. Defendant answered and asserted numerous affirmative defenses and subsequently sought dismissal of the claim. After claimant failed to submit any papers in opposition to defendant’s motion, the Court of Claims granted the motion upon his default and dismissed the claim. Claimant now appeals.

It is well settled that no appeal is permitted from an order entered upon a party’s default (see CPLR 5511), the sole remedy being to move to vacate the default order and, if that motion is denied, to appeal such denial (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Matter of Susan UU. v Scott VV., 119 AD3d 1117, 1118 [2014] ; Matter of Jay v Fischer, 102 AD3d 1021, 1021 [2013]; DeLuke v Albany Rest. Supply, Inc., 42 AD3d 601, 601 [2007]). Here, claimant did not file any responsive papers to defendant’s motion, despite evidence in the record establishing that he was properly served with the motion. Accordingly, the Court of Claims properly treated claimant’s failure to respond to defendant’s motion as a default (see Matter of County of Albany [Bowles], 91 AD3d 1132, 1133 [2012]; M & C Bros., Inc. v Torum, 75 AD3d 869, 870-871 [2010]). As claimant has failed to move to vacate the default order, his appeal is not properly before us.

McCarthy, Garry, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.  