
    15603.
    Medlock v. Nichols.
    Decided October 7, 1924.
    Complaint; from city court of Decatur — Judge Daley. April 9, 1924.
    
      Carl T. Hudgins, for plaintiff in error.
    
      L. J. Steele, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is nothing in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial in this case that requires a reversal of the judgment, and no error was committed when the judge overruled the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J.,- and Ltohe, J., concur.  