
    Charles L. Littlewood, App’lt, v. W. H. Riley et al., Resp’ts.
    Sup. Ct. 2 D.
    July 26, 1895.
    
      James C. Church, for app'lt; Willis & Wallis (William G. Wilson, of counsel), for resp’ts.
   Pratt, J.

— The plaintiff’s case depends entirely upon his own testimony. He is contradicted by two witnesses and the written instruments. Giving to his testimony full faith, and all that is established is that the minds of the parties did not meet.. At most, that would only authorize a recission of the contract. That would not benefit the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs. _A11 concur.  