
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Mayra CASTILLO-VALENZUELA, Defendant — Appellant.
    No. 02-50204.
    D.C. No. CR-01-03274-MJL.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 13, 2002.
    
    Decided Jan. 22, 2003.
    Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mayra Castillo-Valenzuela appeals her conviction by guilty plea and sentence for one count of importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Castillo-Valenzuela’s contention that section 960 is facially unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), is foreclosed by United States v. Hernandez, 314 F.3d 430, 437-438 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     