
    On petitioners’ motion for reconsideration filed November 8, 1993, reconsideration allowed; opinion (124 Or App 210, 859 P2d 1202) withdrawn;
    reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 19, 1994
    In the Matter of the Compensation of Kurt D. Cutlip, Claimant. CRAWFORD & COMPANY and Epson Portland, Inc., Petitioners, v. LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE CORPORATION, Oregon-Canadian Forest Products and Kurt D. Cutlip, Respondents.
    
    (WCB 91-12437, 91-13835; CA A78445)
    866 P2d 523
    William H. Walters, and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen for motion.
    No appearance contra.
    
    Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs, Judge, and Durham, Judge pro tempore.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioners move for reconsideration of our opinion, 124 Or App 210, 859 P2d 1202, affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on the basis of our holding in SAIF v. Drews, 117 Or App 596, 845 P2d 215 (1993). Drews held that, in cases involving successive injuries, the employer with the last accepted claim need only prove that a new industrial injury involving the same condition materially contributed to claimant’s condition, in order to shift responsibility to a subsequent employer under ORS 656.308(1). However, the Supreme Court subsequently reversed our decision in Drews and held that the employer with the last accepted claim must prove that the new injury at a subsequent employer is the major contributing cause of the need for treatment in order to shift responsibility to the later employer. SAIF v. Drews, 318 Or 1, 860 P2d 254 (1993). In view of the Supreme Court’s decision, we allow reconsideration, withdraw our opinion and reverse and remand to the Board for reconsideration under the proper standard.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; reversed and remanded for reconsideration.  