
    IN RE: Shaun ROSIERE, Petitioner
    No. 17-1092
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 2, 2017
    (Opinion filed: June 2, 2017)
    Shaun Rosiere, Pro Se
    Mark E. Coyne, Esq., Leah A. Farrell, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, John J. Hoffman, Esq., Office of Attorney General of New Jersey, Division of Law Employment Litigation Section, Trenton, NJ, Matthew T. Smith, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Camden, NJ, for Defendant-Respondent
    Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
   OPINION

PER CURIAM

Shaun Rosiere seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on three motions pending in the underlying criminal matter concerning the terms of his supervised release. By order entered April 5, 2017, the District Court denied each motion. In light of the District Court’s action, this mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiffs personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). 
      
       This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.
     