
    Radman Ahmed HUGAIS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 03-74667.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Aug. 10, 2007 .
    Filed Aug. 16, 2007.
    Haitham E. Bailout, Esq., Law Offices of Haitham E. Bailout, Burlingame, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Margaret Perry, Esq., Andrew C. MacLachlan, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: KOZINSKI and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and CEDARBAUM, Senior District Judge.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

The record supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, as Hugais’s testimony and asylum application were inconsistent, and Hugais’s corroborating evidence depends on his testimony. Substantial evidence thus supports the IJ’s finding that Hugais didn’t show he is eligible for asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B). Hugais is therefore also necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). Given the adverse credibility finding, Hugais’s claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture also fails because a reasonable adjudicator would not be compelled to find that it’s more likely than not that Hugais would be tortured if removed. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2).

PETITION DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     