
    State of Connecticut v. Nathan Arrington
    Argued December 7
    decided December 7, 1976
    
      Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
    No appearance for the appellant (defendant).
   It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.  