
    Joseph Mechanick, complainant, v. Gustav Duschaneck and Martha Duschaneck, defendants.
    [Decided April 16th, 1926.]
    1. To a common bill for the specific performance of a contract -of sale the parties to the contract are the only proper parties.
    2. A subvendee is not an assignee of nor privy to the contract between the owner and his vendee, the vendor of the subvendee, and cannot enforce the original contract and compel the owner to convey direct to him.
    3. Query. Has not a subvendee such an equity in the contract between the owner and his vendee, the vendor of the subvendee, as to entitle him to a specific performance of the original contract in a suit to compel his vendor to perform?
    On motion to strike bill.
    
      Messrs. Wolber & Gilhooly, for the motion.
    
      Mr. Edward S. Bessman and Mr. Joseph S. Nardiello, for the complainant.
   Backes, V. C.

The defendant Dusehaneek, by contract in writing, agreed to sell and convey his land to one Abruzzo. Abruzzo assigned the contract to O’Donnell & Arotsky. O’Donnell & Arotsky agreed in writing to convey the land to the complainant, subject to acquiring title. The bill is to enforce the original contract and compel Dusehaneek to convey to the complainant.' The complainant cannot recover directly on the original contract. He is neither party nor privy to it; he is not an assignee. McVoy v. Baumann, 93 N. J. Eq. 360. To a common bill for the specific performance of a contract of sale the parties to the contract are the only proper parties. Bacot v. Wetmore, 17 N. J. Eq. 250.

But the complainant ought not be put out of court. He may have an equity which he is entitled to enforce. There is authority for maintaining a suit by a subvendee against the owner to compel him to perform his contract with his vendee, and in the same suit to compel the complainant’s vendor to specifically perform his contract. 25 R. C. L. 327; Fry Spec. Perf. 73, 74.

The motion to strike will prevail, with permission to amend. The original vendee and the vendors of the complainant must be made parties, and properly charged. The question whether the complainant may recover on his amended bill is not decided, and will be authoritatively disposed of only after the defendants’ counsel is heard on motion to strike the amended bill.  