
    THE UNITED STATES v. GORDON AND OTHERS.
    Msent...*Livingston, J. and Todd, J.
    
    '^rwld'oe” He to cany to court Uor&I United states whillcfeW carried from. District elm* ^outf by writ ofer- ; It js a good defence an a?t!oa Ia°gn0bond,m" that it was f¿aan doúhhT the value of bUalglfandthat the «fasterwas bt0^ ¿ * clearances
    THIS was an action of debt brought in the District Court of the United States for the district of Virginia, upon an embargo-band, dated the 2d of November, 1808, conditioned to reland the cargo of the Essex, in some port of the United States, the danger of the seas only excePted-
    The Defendants, among other things, pleaded following plea, viz.; «"And the said Defendants for further plea why the United States ought not to have and maintain the said action, say, that the said bond was given and executed for more than double the value of the vessel and cargo, mentioned in the recital condition of the said bond; to wit, in a sum x.bf eight thousand dollars more than, double the said value; and the said last mentioned Defendants ayer that the obligors were constrained to execute the said bond by. the refusal of the collector of the port of Tappahannock clear and permit the said vessél and her cargo to depart from the port and'district of Tappahannock 'until the same bond was éxecuted ás aforesaid, and tl%.they are ready to verify,” &cs
    To this.plea there was a general demurrer, which was overruled by the district judge (Txíer.) The United States earned the cause up to the Circuit Court by writ of error, where the judgment was affirmed by MaRSHAUL, C. J.
    
   The United States brought another writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States, which was dismissed for want of jurisdiction; upon the authority of the case of United States v. Goodwin at the last term.  