
    Michelson, administrator, v. Lavin.
    Bleckley, C. J. — There is no merit whatever in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial; the damages do not appear to be excessive, and no cause for reversing the judgment appears.
    October 15, 1894.
    Action for slander. Before Judge Sweat. Glynn superior court. May term, 1893.
    Symmes & Bennet, by Harrison & Peeples, for plaintiff in error. Harris & Sparks and P. H. Harris, contra.
    
   Judgment affirmed.  