
    (March 6, 1888.)
    HAYWARD v. BOLTON et al.
    [17 Pac. 457.]
    APPEAL from Third Judicial District, County of Bear Lake.
    Following ease of Innis v. Bolton.
    
    R. Z. Johnson, for Appellant.
    No brief on file.
    Ensign & Stull, for Respondents.
    Same brief as in ease of Innis v. Bolton et al.
    
   BRODERICK, J.

The same questions are involved in this case which were presented in the case of Innis v. Bolton, ante, p. 442, 17 PaC. 264, just decided by this court; and for the reasons given therein, and upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the court below in this ease is hereby affirmed.

Hays, C. J., and Buck, J., concur.  