
    Massigh STALLMAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 98184.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Feb. 13, 2013.
    Mark Allen Grothoff, Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellants.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard Anthony Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondents.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Massigh Stallman (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  