
    Bertha M. BOGG, a Widow, Appellant, v. William L. GEEZIL and Donnis Lee Geezil, Appellees.
    Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.
    Oct. 26, 1955.
    B. M. Skelton and Robert H. Willis, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
    McClure & Turville, St. Petersburg, for William L. Geezil; Rosetti, Lenas, Berch-told & Greer, St. Petersburg, for Donnis Lee Geezil; Sid M. Saunders, pro se; Ram-seur, Bradham & Clark, St. Petersburg, for Keith K. Keltner.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A., Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THORN-AL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.  