
    Peter B. Appledorn vs. James B. Streeter.
    f fn this case we have boon unable to procure enough of the facts, or of the ©pinion ©f the fllourt, to warrant a head note, but g.Wo briefly what are i epreeented as the snaiu facts, and the conclusion ©flaw tboreon.]
   Streeter sued Appledorn on a note. By the evidence it appeared that the note was given with a mortgage on lands, and that after the note fell due it was paid by a man who bad bought the land subject to the payment of this mortgage. This man afterwards sold the note to another man, who sold to Streeter. The Circuit Court gave judgment for Streeter.

Held, that this judgment was erroneous. The payment of the note after it became due extinguished it, and no one couldi afterwards acquire a r.iglit to collect it by buying the canceled paper.

Judgment reversed.  