
    Burkhalter v. Roach; et vice versa.
    
    Nos. 1573, 1574.
    April 14, 1920.
    Equitable petition. Before Judge Sheppard. Evans superior court. June 5, 1919.
    
      W. T. Burkhalter, W. G. Warnell, and J. 8. Daniel, for plaintiff.
    
      Iiines, Hardwick & Jordan, E. C. Elmore, John P. Moore, and P. M. Anderson, for defendant.-
   Hill, J.

This is the fourth appearance of this case in the Supreme Court. Burkhalter v. Roach, 142 Ga. 344 (82 S. E. 1059); s. c. 145 6a. 834 (90 S. E. 52); s. c. 149 6a. 565 (101 S. E. 123). In the main bill of exceptions no such errors are pointed out as having been committed by the trial court as will require a reversal. The general charge of the court covered the issues made in the ease; and while there are some inaccuracies in the charge, they are not of such a nature as will cause the grant of a new trial. In so far as the requests to charge were pertinent and proper, they were covered by the main charge. Other assignments of error are without substantial merit. '

Judgment affirmed on the main bill of exception. Oross-bill dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent for providential cause.  