
    MILLER, Respondent, v. FORREST, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    December 6, 1905.)
    Action by Theresa Miller, by guardian, against William Forrest.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

HISCOCK, J.,

dissents upon the ground that it was errdr to refuse to charge, as requested by defendant’s counsel, that, in addition to the other elements referred to in the charge, plaintiff “must show that the dog was improperly confined ; that he was let loose negligently.”  