
    24006.
    Bearden v. The State.
    Decided July 9, 1934.
    
      Paul PL. Field, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John O. Mitchell, solioilor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of possessing whisky, and his motion for a new trial embraced only the usual general grounds. While the evidence was conflicting and would have authorized the acquittal of the accused, it also authorized the finding of the jury; and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gfuerry, JJ., concur.  