
    No. 44857.
    Protest 838443-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co. (Baltimore).
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware the same as that passed upon in Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.  