
    PALMS v. STATE.
    (No. 6441.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 9, 1921.)
    Criminal law <@=»I097(5) — Special charges and questions raised in motion for new trial not reviewable in absence of statement of facts.
    Questions raised by special charges which were refused, and in the motion for new trial, cannot be reviewed in the absence of a statement of facts.
    Appeal from District Court, Collin County ; F. E. Wilcox, Judge.
    George Palms was convicted of theft, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   LATTIMORE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Collin county of the offense of theft of property of the value of more than $50, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There are some questions raised by special charges which were refused, and in the motion for new trial, the correctness of which we cannot determine because of the absence of a statement of facts.

We have' examined the indictment and the charge of the court, which seem to be in conformity with law, and, finding no error in the record calling for a reversal, an affirmance is ordered.  