
    The Phœnix Bridge Company, Respondent, v. Daniel J. Creem et al., Appellants.
    
      Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 102 App. Div. 354, affirmed.
    (Argued May 16, 1906;
    decided June 5, 1906.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered •March 31, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover the expense of defending an action brought against the plaintiff, and the amount of a judgment paid in settlement thereof, which judgment was recovered for personal injuries occasioned by defendants’ negligence in the performace of certain work sub-contracted to the defendants by plaintiff.
    
      Robert H. Wilson for appellants.
    
      Henry Galbraith Ward and George M. Clarke for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight and Hiscock, JJ. Dissenting: Chase, J. Absent: Gray and O’Brien, JJ;  