
    MURRAY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    June 18, 1909.)
    Action by Katherine Murray~ as administratrix, against the New York Cen, tral & Hudson River Railroad Company.
    R. A~ Kutschbock, for appellant R. D. Thurber, fo~ respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirm~ ed, with costs. Order filed.

INGRAHAM and LAUGHLIN, JJ.,

dissent on the ground that the verdict finding the plni& tiff free from contributory negligence is agains4 the weight of evidence.  