
    KETCHAM vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Kent),
    4 D. L. N., 764.
   To compel respondent to dismiss a writ of garnishment, because no notice had been given to the principal defendant, under Nule 35, of the intention to issue the writ.

Denied November 17, 1897.

Held, that it was not the intent of the rule to compel the giving of notices in advance in any case, where, under the old rules of practice, it was not necessary to previously apprise the opposite party in advance of the proceedings about to be taken.  