
    LEVY, Respondent, v. ZEMAN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June, 1901.)
    Action by Abraham Levy against Isaac Zeman.
    Abraham L. Goldstone, for appellant. Aaron Morris, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The evidence would have justified a judgment against both defendants. It was upon the appellant’s own motion that no judgment was rendered against the codefendant. He cannot now be heard to object that his motion was granted. The judgment was not against the weight of evidence. The defendant’s story that the services were rendered as a matter of courtesy only is most improbable. Judgment affirmed, with costs.  