
    ALBERT C. D’ALOIA ET AL., RELATORS, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
    Argued May 7, 1924
    Decided June 25, 1924.
    Civil Service — True Construction of L. 1908, p. 235, § 26.
    For writ of mandamus.
    
    Before Justices Kalisch, Black and Campbell.
    For the relators, Ernest L. Quacicenbush.
    
    For the defendant, Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general of New Jersey.
   Per Curiam.

A rule was granted in this case why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue out of the court, directed to- the civil service commission of New Jersey. The point involved is the true construction of a section of the Civil Service act (Pamph. L. 1908, p. 235. ¶ 26), and a supplement thereto (Pamph. L. 1918, p. 158), a salary regulation which is known as the classification and standardization plan. This statute is of state-wide application and of general public interest. We think the alternative writ should issue, and it is so ordered.  