
    COMPTON v. HOPKINS et al.
    (No. 5774.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas.
    March 21, 1917.)
    Appeal and Ebroe <&wkey;773(4) — Review—Af-firmance.
    Where an examination of the record failed to disclose any fundamental error, and appellant submitted no brief on appeal, the case being submitted on the briefs for appellee, judgment will be affirmed.
    [Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 3104, 3109.]
    
      Appeal from Williamson County Court; Richard Critz, Judge.
    Action by C. V. Compton against Y. P. Hopkins- and P. D. Rosenbaum. From a judgment against Rosenbaum alone and in favor of ■ Hopkins, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Melasky & Moody, of Taylor, for appellee Hopkins.
   RICE, J.

This suit was brought by appellant against Y. E. Hopkins, as maker, and P. D. Rosenbaum, as indorser, of a promissory note indorsed to appellee. Upon a jury trial appellant recovered judgment against Rosenbaum alone for the amount of the note, interest, and attorney’s fees, judgment being entered in favor of Hopkins, and he was discharged with his costs, from which judgment appellant has prosecuted this appeal, but has filed no brief in this court, the case having been submitted on the briefs for appellee alone.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any fundamental error, the judgment of the court below is in all things affirmed.

Affirmed. 
      ite>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     