
    Hirsch v. The City of Cincinnati.
    
      Supreme court — Dismissals—Constitutional questions not involved.
    
    (No. 14882
    Decided November 9, 1915.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
    
      Mr. James S. Myers, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. Walter M. Schoenle, city solicitor, and Mr. Edwin S. Morrissey, municipal court prosecutor, for defendant in error.
   The court finds that the jurisdiction of this court in this proceeding in error was based on the allegation in the petition in error that it involves questions arising under the constitution of the United States and of the state of Ohio, and the court finds that the record does not. disclose that the disposition of the case requires the consideration of any constitutional question, or that such question is involved.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.  