
    In re Kenon Durell SWEAT, Petitioner.
    No. 14-1695.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 18, 2014.
    Decided: Nov. 20, 2014.
    Kenon Durell Sweat, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpubhshed PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenon Durell Sweat petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. According, although we grant Sweat’s motion to amend his financial statement and grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.  