
    In the Matter of the Last Will of Frederick Herr, Dec’d.
    
      (Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,
    
    
      Filed April 11, 1889.)
    
    1. Collateral inheritance tax—Exemption prom payment op on lega-
    cies TO CHARITABLE SOCIETIES—LAWS 1887, CHAP. 713.
    To entitle any charitable society to be exempted from the succession tax to be paid under chapter 713, Laws of 1887, there must be a total and absolute exemption from general taxation of all property which it has, or could have, under any and every possible circumstance or condition. If any such society could, by any possibility, own or hold property, real or personal, which would be subject to taxation, then it is liable to be taxed under the collateral inheritance acts.
    2. Same—R. S., part 1, chap, xm, title 1, as amended by Laws 1866,
    chap. 136—Limitation op exemption.
    By the terms of the Revised Statutes, part 1, chap, xiii, title 1, as originally passed, “the real and personal property belonging to, or connected with,” the societies mentioned in subdivision 4 were exempted; but by chapter 136 of the Laws of 1866 this was amended so as to exempt only “ the real and personal property used for such purposes, belonging to or connected with these societies. So that the exemption is now limited only to the real property actually occupied by the society, and the personal property contained in the same, and directly used for such charitable purposes.
    3. Same—What charitable corporations exempt.
    Subdivision 4, as thus amended, practically corresponds with subdivision 3, which pertains to the exemption of the lots of ground and the buildings thereon erected for the use of a college and the furniture belonging^ to each building, so that now there are no charitable corporations which are not subject to the succession tax, except those which are expressly exempt from taxation by their charters, and those whose property is so exempt under all circumstances by general law.
   _ Abbott, S.

—Chapter 713, Laws of 1887, section 1, pro-_ vides that “all property which shall pass by will * * from any person who may die seized or possessed of the same, while a resident of this state, * * to any person or persons, or to any body politic or corporate * * other than to * * the societies, corporations and institutions now exempted by law from taxation * * shall be, and is, subject to a tax of five dollars on every one hundred dollars of the clear market value of such property,” etc.

The will of Frederick Herr bequeathed to divers charitable corporations legacies as follows:

‘1 To the Bush wick and East Brooklyn Dispensary, located at Myrtle and Lewis avenues, the sum of one thousand dollars.
“To the Evangelical Home for the Aged, located on Fairfax street, between Broadway and Bushwick avenue, the sum of one thousand dollars.
“To the Wartburg Home, located at East New York (now the twenty-sixth ward of the city of Brooklyn), the sum of one thousand dollars.
“To the Lutheran Hospital, located at East New York, aforesaid, the sum of one thousand dollars.
“ To the Brooklyn Home for Consumptives, the sum of one'thousand dollars.
“To the Orphan Asylum at Mount Vernon, New York, the sum of one thousand dollars.”

The question to be determined is whether the above-named corporations and societies fall within the above-quoted exception, as “societies, corporations and institutions now exempted by law from taxation.”

Section 1, title 1, chapter 13, part 1, of the Revised Statutes, provides: “All lands and all personal estate within this state, whether owned by individuals or corporations, shall be liable to taxation, subject to the exemptions hereinafter specified.”

Section 4 provides: “The following property shall be exempt from taxation:

“4. Every poor-hou^e, alms-house, house of industry, and every house belonging to a company incorporated for the reformation of offenders, or to improve the moral condition of seamen, and the real and personal property used for such purposes belonging to, or connected with, the same.”

The court of appeals, in Catlin v. Trustees of Trinity College et al. (22 N. Y. State Rep., 189), has finally and conclusively settled all questions which can arise upon any claim to exemption under subdivision 7 of section 4, title 1, chapter 13, part 1, Revised Statutes, and has held that this exemption relates only to the class of corporations specified in title 4 of that chapter.

Therefore, if the corporations under consideration are entitled to the exemption claimed, it must be because they are exempt from general taxation under subdivision 4, above quoted.

I have no doubt that all the institutions maintained by the corporations above named are almshouses within this sub-division. Asso. for Benefit of Colored Orphans v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 104 N. Y., 581; 6 N. Y. State Rep., 477; N. Y. Infant Asylum v. Board of Supervisors of Westchester County, 31 Hun, 116; People of the State of New York ex rel. The Swiss Benevolent Soc. v. The Comr. of Taxes, etc., 36 id., 311.

But it still remains to be determined whether, even though these societies are entitled to the exemption granted by that sub-division, they are not still liable to taxation under chapter 713, Laws of 1887. To entitle these societies to exemption from taxation under the last mentioned act, there must be a total and absolute exemption from general taxation of all property which they have, or could have, under any and every possible circumstance or condition; and if these corporations could by any possibility own or hold any property, real or personal, which would be subject to taxation, then they are liable to be taxed under the collateral inheritance acts.

This leads us to a construction of sub-division 4.

By reference to the earlier editions of the Revised Statutes we find that this sub-division originally exempted from taxation, “ the real and personal property belonging to or connected with ” the societies mentioned "in this subdivision.

By chapter 136 of the Laws of 1866, this section was amended so as to exempt “the real and personal property used for such purposes belonging to or connected with” these societies.

The insertion of the words “ used for such purposes ” would appear to have been intended to limit the exemption to the real property actually occupied, and the personal property actually contained in the same, and directly used for the charitable purposes specified.

I am convinced that it was the intention of the legislature by this amendment to make sub-division 4 practically correspond to the provisions of sub-division 3, which pertain to exemptions of the “buildings erected for the use of a college, * * * and the several lots whereon such buildings are situated, and the furniture belonging to each of them;” and, therefore, in view of the decision of the court of appeals in Catlin v. Trustees of Trinity College (supra), that there are no charitable corporations which are not subject to the succession tax, except those which are expressly exempt from taxation by their charters, and those, ah of whose property is so exempt under all circumstances by general law.

I am of the opinion that the corporations under consideration are liable to taxation under chapter 713 of the Laws of 1887.  