
    Daniel F. PRISNER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 79881.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    April 23, 2002.
    Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Susan L. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    
      Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel F. Prisner (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel in failing to strike certain venirepersons. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.
     