
    COLLINS v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 28, 1912.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1144) — Appeal — Condition of Record — Presumptions.
    Where, on an appeal from a conviction, no statement of facts accompanies the record, and no bill of exceptions is contained therein, it will be presumed that the court correctly charged all the law applicable to the evidence adduced, so that an affirmance is warranted, where the indictment is valid and the charge submits the offense charged therein.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2736-2781, 2901, 3016-3037; Dec. Dig. § 1144.]
    Appeal from District Court, Williamson County; Chas. A. Wilcox, Judge.
    W. F. Collins, alias W. F. Carr, was convicted of incest, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Chas. L. Harty, of Georgetown, for 'appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic ana section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of incest, and his punishment assessed at ten years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts accompanying the record, and no bills of exceptions contained therein. Under such circumstances, if the indictment is valid, and the charge of the court submits the offense charged in the Indictment, we will presume that the court charged the law, and all the law, applicable to the evidence adduced. Banks v. State, 24 Tex. App. 559, 7 S. W. 327, and cases cited in section 846 in White’s Ann. Code of Crim. Proc.

The judgment is affirmed.  