
    EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. M. A. GLEASON, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
    Argued October 8, 1924
    Decided February 5 1925.
    On appeal from the District Court of the city of Camden.
    
      Before Justices Trenchakd. Mint urn and Lloyd.
    Por the appellant, Herman B. J. Wecksiein.
    
    For the appellee, Thoiims P. Gurley.
    
   Per Curiam.

Onr examination of the record discloses no error justifying reversal. This case was argued with Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, No. 475, of the present term, but it differs from that in a material matter. Here, the evidence permitted of the inference by the trial judge, sitting without a jury, that the plaintiff deceived the defendant as to the fact that he was signing a contract, by the falso representation that he was signing, as a matter of form, a paper having no obligatory force.

This testimony furnishes a basis for the judment in favor of the defendant, which will be affirmed, with costs.  