
    Wormly vs. The State of Georgia.
    1. A ground of a motion for a new trial to the effect that the court admitted certain evidence over the objections of the defendant, without stating any ground therefor, raises no question which this court can decide.
    
      (a.) In the x>resent case no sufficient reason is shown to us for rejecting evidence tending to show that a defendant charged with larceny, when arrested, had other goods in his possession belonging to the same owner and which were missed about the same time when the horse was taken, with the larceny of which defendant was charged.
    2. The verdict is sustained by the evidence.
    Judgment affirmed.
    March 13, 1883.
   Hall, Justice.  