
    PEOPLE v. ANDERSON.
    Criminal Law — Intoxicating Liquors — That No Case Was Made May Not be First Raised on Motion to Set Aside Verdict.
    Where the question that no ease of illegal possession of intoxicating liquors was in fact made against defendant was not raised during the trial, it may not be raised by motion to set aside the verdict and to arrest the judgment.
    
    Exceptions before judgment from Newaygo; Barton (Joseph), J.
    Submitted April 15, 1926.
    (Docket No. 152.)
    Decided June 7, 1926.
    Louis Anderson was convicted of violating the liquor law.
    Affirmed.
    
      Roman F. Glocheski, for appellant.
    
      
      Criminal Law, 17 C. J. § 3331.
    
   Clark, J.

Defendant’s exceptions challenge his conviction of having possessed intoxicating liquor unlawfully on the 'ground that no case of possession, in fact, was made against him. The point was not raised during the trial by motion, request, or otherwise. It is attempted after verdict by motion to set aside verdict and to arrest judgment. It may not be so raised. Tishhouse v. Schoenberg, 234 Mich. 271; 34 C. J. p. 39. A consideration of the merits would not change the result.

Affirmed, and remanded for judgment.

Bird, C. J., and Sharpe, Snow, Steere,. Fellows, Wiest, and McDonald, JJ., concurred.  