
    Grady Richter, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
    
    138 So. 728.
    Division A.
    Decision filed January 7, 1932.
    
      H. H. Wells, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      
      Cary D. Lamáis, Attorney General and Boy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.
   Pee Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court 'be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Terrell, J.J., concur.

Brown and Davis, J.J., dissent.  