
    17555.
    Knowles v. Roser.
    Decided November 9, 1926.
    Trover; from Floyd superior court — Judge Maddox. June 14, 1926.
    
      Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for plaintiff.
    
      Harris & Harris, for defendant.
    Appeal and Error, 4 O. J. p. 834, n. 60.
    New Trial, 29 Oye. p. 942, n. 95.
   Broyles, O. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence authorized the verdict for the defendant, and the refusal to grant the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.  