
    13408.
    Chapman v. The State.
    Decided May 9, 1922.
    Accusation of possessing liquor; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Nunnally. February 7, 1922.
    
      W. H. Ennis, for plaintiff in error.
    
      James Maddox, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

When all the facts of the case are considered there is no error in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; there is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the case, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.  