
    Joel H. TUCKER, Plaintiff in Error, v. CITY OF SEBRING, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant in Error.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 7, 1935.
    Fairfax T. Haskins, of Sebring, for plaintiff in error.
    W. H. Nollman, of Sebring, and Huffaker & Edwards, of Bartow, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to that of Hope-rich v. City of Sebring, 161 So. 275, in which opinion was filed at -this term of the court.

The judgment should be' affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion in that ease.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and TERRELL, BUFORD, and DAYIS, JJ., concur.

ELLIS, J., concurs in the conclusion.

BROWN, J., concurs specially.

BROWN, Justice

(concurring).

I concur for the reasons stated in-my special concurring opinion in the companion case of Hoperich v. City of Sebring, 161 So. 275.  