
    Pritz, etc. v. Messer et al.
    
      Supreme Court — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (19299
    Decided November 10, 1925.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
    
      Mr. Robert P. Goldman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. Saul Zielonka; Mr. Frank K. Bowman, city solicitor; Mr. L. L. Forchheimer and Messrs. Heints & Heints, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition-in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.

Robinson, J., not participating.  