
    EARP v. CITY OF DETROIT.
    Appeal and Error — Pinal Judgment — Jurisdiction—Dismissal op Appeal Taken as op Right.
    Summary judgment for 1 of 3 defendants held, not to be a final judgment appealable as of right where, trial court failed to make a determination that there was no just reason for delay and to make express direction for entry of judgment; ' the Court' of Appeals is without jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal (GCR 1963, 117.2[1], 518.2).
    References for Points in Headnote
    4 Am Jur 2d,-Appeal and Error §§ 50-64; 5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 908.
    Appeal from Wayne; Bowles (George E.), J.
    Submitted Division 1 June 5, 1968, at Detroit.
    (Docket No. 4,250.)
    Decided June 10, 1968.
    Complaint by Richard Earp against City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, and the Detroit Police Department, and Michigan Bell Telephone Company, a Michigan corporation, for invasion of privacy, loss of employment, and ridicule. Summary judgment for defendant telephone company. Plaintiff appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    
      Kelly, Greenstein & McCann, for plaintiff.
    
      Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust é Kennedy (A. E. Williams and John L. Vanker, of counsel), and Alan R. Waterstone, for Michigan Bell Telephone Company.
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the order of the trial court granting defendant Michigan Bell Telephone Company’s motion for summary judgment under GfCR 1963, 117.2(1). This is not a final judgment appealable as of right for the reason that GOB. 1963, 518.2 was not complied with. This Court is without jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed. Fox v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan (1965), 375 Mich 238; and Standard Building Products Company v. Woodland Building Company (1965), 1 Mich App 434, 437.

(Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gnus, JJ., concurred.  