
    15884.
    Sistrunk v. The State.
    Decided November 13, 1924.
   Luke, J.

The evidence fully authorized the conviction. The grounds of the motion for a new trial which are approved by the court are without merit. Dor no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Blood/worth, J., concur.

ConvictioiL of cheating and swindling; from city court of Fair-burn—Judge Parker. July 81, 1984.

J. E. Sistrunk, pro se.  