
    Aycock v. The Bank of Bainbridge.
    When the judgment of the superior court which is sought to be reviewed is one denying or overruling a motion for a new trial, and the bill of exceptions neither sets forth any evidence nor specifies any as material to be sent up, and does not state that none of the evidence is material, and where the certificate of the judge to the bill of exceptions makes no mention of or reference to any evidence, there is no proper writ of error applicable to the case sought to be brought up, and the motion to dismiss the defective writ for this reason must be granted.
    July 17, 1893.
    O. G. Gurley, by brief, for plaintiff' in error.
    Russell & Russell, by Harrison & Peeples, contra.
    
   Writ of error dismissed.  