
    MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS
    The Supreme Court of Ohio has issued orders imposing sanctions upon seventeen attorneys for noncompliance with the requirements of Gov. Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education. The text of the entry imposing the sanction is reproduced below. This is followed by a list of the attorneys who were sanctioned. The list includes each attorney’s Attorney Registration Number; the county and state of residence and the county and state of the attorney’s employer, as last registered with the Office of Attorney Registration; and the amount of the sanction fee imposed by the Supreme Court.
    In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education.
    (# [Attorney Registration No.]), Respondent. [Name of Attorney]
    ORDER [Filed March 14, 2002]
   This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov. Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1999-2000 reporting period.

On November 14, 2001, pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (B)(1), this Court issued to the respondent an order to show cause why the Commission’s recommendation should not be adopted and an order so entered against the respondent. Respondent filed objections to the Commission’s recommendation, the Commission filed an answer brief, and this cause was considered by the Court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the Court, sua sponte, that respondent shall pay to the Commission on Continuing Legal Education, within 30 days of the date of this order, by certified check, bank check or money order, a sanction fee which is hereby imposed in the total amount of $[ ].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall record the respondent’s status on the roll of attorneys as “NOT IN GOOD STANDING” until such time as the respondent has complied with this Order but that this Order shall not be considered a disciplinary order pursuant to Gov. Bar R. V or Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. H.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission shall notify the Clerk of the Court when payment of the imposed sanction has been made by respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, payment of the sanction notwithstanding, respondent shall comply with the requirements imposed by Gov. Bar R. X for the 1999-2000 reporting period. See OLE Reg. 503.04.

Attorney Name

Leon Simmons Jr.

James Constantine Venizelos

Richard AJden Smith

Robert Bond Young

Robert John Winston

James Patrick Shields

Alaine Young Miller

Marilyn Pokorny

Michael Paul Varga-Sinka

James Christopher Sestak

Jessica Elaine Price

Elizabeth Ann Perl

Jay Wilson Maynard

Larry Brian Shoemaker

Tina Kay Manning

Barbara Joan Morsa

Registration

Number

0023786

0056076

0043739

0013608

0088389

0068962

0058686

0009888

0012046

0059528

0068782

0068940

0029359

0046715

0025550

0059849

Residence County

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Franklin

Franklin

Hamilton

Montgomery

Residence State

OH

OH

CA

DE

IL

PA

WA

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

Employer County

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Franklin

Franklin

Hamilton

Hamilton

Employer State

CA

DE

IL

PA

WA

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

Sanction Amount

$150.00

$100.00

$600.00

$750.00

$490.00

$100.00

$150.00

$700.00

$500.00

$400.00

$150.00

$150.00

$620.00

$600.00

$600.00

$230.00

Attorney Name

Jeffrey Thomas Vild

Registration Number

0029535

Residence County

Lucas

Residence State

OH

Employer County

Lucas

Employer State

OH

Sanction Amount

$100.00

In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education.

Mark Steven Sinkiewicz (# 0060022), Respondent.

ENTRY

This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar- R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1997-1998 reporting period.

On April 6, 2000, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent and suspended the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3), and Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7); respondent complies with the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, respondent complies with this afid all other orders of the court, and this court orders respondent reinstated.

On March 7, 2002, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. On March 7, 2002, the commission certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required during his suspension by this court’s order of suspension. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, Mark Steven Sinkiewicz, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.  