
    Nathan Weber et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Weber, Levy Co., Appellants, v. Hosiery Manufacturers Corporation, Respondent.
    
      Contract — sale — pleading — complaint dismissed as not stating cause of action under section 144 of Sale of Goods Act.
    
    
      Weber v. Hosiery Manfrs. Corpn., 207 App. Div. 856, affirmed.
    (Argued January 18, 1924;
    decided February 26, 1924.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 12, 1923, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term. The action was to recover upon an alleged contract for the purchase and sale of goods. The complaint was dismissed upon the ground that it did not state a cause of action under section 144 of the Sale of Goods Act.
    
      Otto C. Sommerich for appellants.
    
      Frederick M. Czaki and Marion Erwin for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaugh- • lin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.  