
    KATZ v. LOTT.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    January 26, 1912.)
    Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Solomon Katz., an infant, against Charles H. Lott. From a judgment on a verdict directed for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for new trial, plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.
    L. F. Fish, for appellant.
    George Hahn, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We think that there was a question of fact for the jury, and that upon the evidence the learned trial judge was not justified in directing a verdict for the defendant. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

McLaughlin, j., dissents.  