
    Benjamin Ury, Respondent, v. New York City Car Advertising Company, Appellant.
    
      Contract — services •— master and servant — action to recover for alleged wrongful discharge from employment.
    
    
      Ury v. New York City Car Adv. Co., 222 App. Div. 736, affirmed.
    (Argued June 6, 1928;
    decided June 21, 1928.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 4,1928, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The action was to recover for an alleged breach of a contract whereby defendant employed plaintiff as a solicitor of advertising, it being alleged that plaintiff was wrongfully discharged before the expiration of his term of employment.
    
      Caruthers Ewing, Clayton J. Heermance and S. Michael Ress for appellant.
    
      Herman Shulman and Samuel Saltzman for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.  