
    21213.
    Still v. The State.
    Decided April 14, 1931.
    
      .Shadcelford & Shadcelford, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Henry H. West, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit. The charge of the court was fair and sufficiently full and was not subject to any of the criticisms urged against it. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  