
    MARTINEZ v. STATE.
    (No. 4777.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 19, 1917.)
    Criminal Law <§=>1094— Appeal — Record— Affirmance.
    Where the indictment for burglary appeared regular, and the instructions were not complained of by any bill of exceptions, and the record contains neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions, nothing is presented for review, and the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Travis County; James R. Hamilton, Judge.
    Reuben Martinez was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.'
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, J.

TMs appeal is from a conviction for burglary, with a punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment appears regular. The case was tried before a jury which was instructed by the court in a charge not complained of by any bill of exceptions. The record contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions. In this state of the record there is nothing presented which this court can review.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.  