
    21851.
    Davis v. The State.
    Decided November 11, 1931.
    
      J. M. Forrester,- W. T. Lane é Son, for plaintiff in error.
    
      T. O. Marshall, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, G. J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict; the motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  