
    MILES v. STATE.
    (No. 11390.)
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 2, 1927.
    Criminal law <©=31081— Accused, after giving notice of appeal, could not withdraw notice after expiration of term.
    Accused, after notice of appeal had been given and jurisdiction of Court of Criminal Appeals had attached, could not withdraw his notice of appeal at time when trial court was in vacation and after expiration of-term.
    Appeal from District Court, Lubbock County ; Homer L. Pharr, Judge.
    Spencer Miles was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Vickers, Campbell & Schenck, of Lubbock, for appellant."
    A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, 1 year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception or statement of facts. There appears in the record an effort on the part of appellant, at a time when the trial court was in vacation and after notice of appeal had been given and the jurisdiction of this court had attached, to withdraw his notice of appeal. We are referred to toe memorandum decision of this court in the case of Smith v. State, 51 Tex. Cr. R. 441, 102 S. W. 1198, as authority supporting the action of the court below in permitting appellant to withdraw his appeal. It does not appear from the short statement of the opinion rendered in said Smith Case whether the effort to withdraw notice of appeal was during the term or after the expiration of toe term. Being of opinion that it could not be done legally after the expiration of the term, we must conclude that,, under the facts before the court in said Smith Case, the effort to withdraw was made during the term. The indictment herein correctly charges the offense, and is followed by the charge given to the jury. No error appearing,1 the judgment will be affirmed.  