
    Michael KNIGHT, through Cheryl Denise KERR, as Personal Representative and Next-of-Kin, Latasha Cure, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a Florida County and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Defendants, Officer Ryan Robinson, Individually and as an Officer of the Miami-Dade Police Department, Michael Mendez, Individually and as an Officer of the Miami-Dade Police Department, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 12-14633.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 19, 2013.
    Benedict P. Kuehne, Susan Dmitrovsky, Law Office of Benedict P. Kuehne, P.A., Jeffrey L. Allen, Law Offices of Jeffrey L. Allen & Associates, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marlon Delano Moffett, State of Florida, Miami-Dade County Attorney’s Office, Bernard Pastor, Ezra Saul Greenberg, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The issue in this case is whether the district court erred in denying summary judgment based on qualified immunity to Officers Ryan Robinson and Michael Mendez of the Miami-Dade Police Department. The officers assert that the court should have disregarded Latasha Cure’s deposition testimony under the sham affidavit rule and then granted summary judgment to them based on their qualified immunity defense. Assuming that the sham affidavit rule applies in these kind of circumstances, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to disregard Latasha Cure’s deposition as a sham, and the district court did not err in finding that there was a genuine issue of material fact requiring that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied. We therefore affirm the denial of summary judgment.  