
    ROSS et al. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION et al.
    No. 24133.
    Sept 12, 1933.
    Bruce & Jefferson, for plaintiffs in error.
    E. 8. Ratliff, for defendants in error.
   HUS'BY, J.

This is a companion case to cause No. 24132, Oils Incorporated v. Corporation Commission et al., this date decided. (165 Okla. 202, 25 P. (2d) 703.) The same property is involved as well as the same period of production. The eases differ only in that the plaintiffs in error in this case are royalty owners, whereas, in cause No. 2(4132 the plaintiff in error was the operator. The legal questions involved which are material to a determination of the issues are identical. The causes have been considered together in, this court, and the ultimate rights of the parties in this ease have been determined in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in cause No. 24132.

The opinion in cause No. 24132 is therefore adopted as the opinion in this case, and this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in a manner not inconsistent with the views announced.

RILEY, C. X, CULLISON, Y. C. X, and SWINDALL. ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and WELCH, JX, concur.  