
    19544.
    Mungin v. The State.
    Decided April 9, 1929.
   Bloodworth, J.

The special- grounds of the motion for a new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds; there is ample evidence to support the finding of the jury, and the judge who tried the case did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Henry O. Fair, for plaintiff in error.

J. T. Grice, solicitor-general, contra.  