
    Julius Cohn v. Meinrod Rumly et al.
    
      Entry on Judge's Docket—Announcement of Finding.—An entry on the judge’s docket is not such an announcement of the finding as deprives the plaintiff of the right to dismiss.
    Filed June 20, 1881.
    Appeal from Laporte Circuit Court.
    Calkins & Wiles, for appellant.
    William E. Higgins, for appellee.
   Opinion of the court by

Mr. Justice Elliott.

The single question presented by this record, is whether an entry made by the court on its own docket is to be deemed the announcement of a finding within the meaning of section 363 of the code. A brief extract from the record will show the character of question and the manner in which it is presented. We quote from the record the following:

‘ ‘ After all the evidence had been introduced, the court wrote and entered the following words upon the j udge’s docket, viz: ‘Find for defts. Judgt. v. plff. for costs.’ Thereupon, before the court had orally announced its finding, the said plaintiff offered and asked leave to dismiss his said action, but the court refused to permit him so to do, to which ruling of the court the plaintiff at the time excepted; that thereupon the court proceeded to and did render judgment against the plaintiff as heretofore set out in the record, to the rendition of which said judgment, the plaintiff at the time objected and excepted.”

We think there was ho such announcement of the finding as deprived the appellant of his right to dismiss. An announcement must be orally made in open court, or by means of a public record, which will bring the ruling to the knowledge of the parties.

Judgment reversed.  