
    Earl Webster COX, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 14-7129.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 12, 2014.
    Decided: Jan. 16, 2015.
    Earl Webster Cox, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Webster Cox, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02102-H (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  