
    Mary LOVAS and one, as admrs., etc., respts., v. INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY CO., applt.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 26, 1916.)
   Judgment and order affirmed with costs. All concur, except Foote, J., who dissents upon the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence on the finding that the plaintiff’s intestate crossed over in front of the south-bound car.  