
    ANDREW SOPKO, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD K. SOPKO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RALPH NORRIS, FRANK NORRIS AND RICHARD WARD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; DORY BROWER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
    Decided June 3, 1926.
    On appeal from the Hudson County Common Pleas Court.
    Before Gummeke, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.
    For the appellants, Lazarus, Brenner & Viclcers.
    
    For the respondents, Alexander B. DeSevo (Alexander Simpson, of counsel).
   Peb Cueiam.

The record in each case brought here on appeal shows that the court made an order that the verdict rendered by the jury he molded to meet the intentions of the jury. There were two verdicts recorded and from each order an appeal has been taken. No judgment, so far as the record discloses, has been entered on either of the verdicts. Hntil judgment is entered no appeal lies. The result is that each appeal must be dismissed.  