
    Bruce Tolbert v. The State.
    No. 5130.
    Decided October 23, 1918.
    Theft—Sufficiency of the Indictment.
    Where, upon trial of theft, the indictment alleged in describing the property that the same was one bale of seed cotton of the value of $100, the same was sufficient. Following Bell v. State, recently decided.
    Appeal from the District Court of Wood. Tried below before the Hon. J. R Warren.
    Appeal from a conviction of theft over fifty dollars; penally, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
    The opinion states the case.
    No brief on file for appellant.
    
      E. B. Hendricks, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   MORROW, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of property over the value of fifty dollars, and his punishment assessed at two years: confinement in the penitentiary.

The only question raised on the record relates to the sufficiency of the indictment, which is challenged on the ground that it is not sufficiently specific in describing the property which is alleged in the indictment to have been “one bale of seed cotton of the value of one hundred dollars.” We think the allegation is sufficient. See.Bell v. State, Ho. 51.29,' this day decided.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.  