
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony MCKIBBINS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10559.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 2, 2009.
    Andrew D. Duncan, Esquire, Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USLV-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Chad A. Bowers, Esquire, Law Offices of Chad A. Bowers, Ltd., Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Tony McKibbins, Adelanto, CA, pro se.
    Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Tony McKibbins appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 210-month sentence for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), and conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2113(a), (d).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), McKibbins’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, all other pending motions are DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     