
    20205.
    Gammage v. The State.
    Decided March 5, 1930.
    
      W. T. Lane, John A. Fork, for plaintiff in error.
    
      T. O. Marshall, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence; the jury, by their verdict, said that the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and the trial judge approved their verdict. This court can not say that the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was improperly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Jjuke, J., concur.  