
    SAYRE against ROSE.
    OF CERTIORARI.
    Eose brought an action against Sayre, on the following state of demand, to wit:—
    The plaintiff comes into court, and pleads that Stephen Sayre is indebted to him for $55, for not paying me the freedom due [*] in his indenture.
    The state of demand was now objected to as unintelligible, and containing no cause of action.
   By the Court.

The state of demand is defective in substance ; no cause of action is set out; who made the indenture; how Mr. Sayre is liable on it; and to whom; does not appear.

Judgment reversed.  