
    No. 5270.
    City of New Orleans v. Germania Insurance Company.
    This case does not differ from the one of the City of New Orleans v. The Salamander Instr ranee Company, reported in the 25th An. This court gave to that case the most attentive and careful consideration, and does not see any reason for changing, in this instance, the conclusions arrived at in said Salamander controversy.
    APPEAL from the Superior District Court, parish of Orleans. HawIcins, J.
    
      8. P. Blanc, assistant city attorney, for plaintiff and appellee. Braughn & Bucle and JDinlcelsjpiel, for defendant and appellant.
   Morgan, J.

This case does not differ from the one of the City of New Orleans v. The Salamander Insurance Company, 25 An. 650.

Counsel for appellant admit that if that case stands this appeal falls. He contends, however, that it is not founded on good law.

We gave the case when it was first presented, and afterward on an application for a rehearing, our careful consideration. We have not been convinced that the conclusions we then came to were erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

There was no session of the Supreme Court .of Louisiana at Opelou-Bas in June 1875.  