
    SCHOICKET v. The STATE.
    S18A0632
    Supreme Court of Georgia.
    Decided: August 20, 2018
    Rebecca Dawn Schoicket, GDC# 1001888170, Lee Arrendale State Prison, PO Box 709, Alto, Georgia 30510-0709, for Appellant.
    Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula Khristian Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, 40 Capitol Square, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30334, Layla Hinton Zon, District Attorney, ALCOVY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 1132 Usher Street, N.W., Suite 313, Covington, Georgia 30014, Walter Cliff Howard, Deputy Chief A.D.A., ALCOVY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 303 S. Hammond Drive, Suite 334, Monroe, Georgia 30655, for Appellee.
   Hunstein, Justice.

Rebecca Dawn Schoicket appeals the denial of her "Motion for Documents and Records at Government Expense." We dismiss the appeal.

In 2015, Schoicket pled guilty to, inter alia, felony murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment plus five years; she did not appeal. In June 2017, Schoicket filed a "Motion for Documents and Records at Government Expense," wherein she sought a copy of the transcript of her guilty plea, any audio- and video-recorded interviews, and various documents that, she said, were necessary for "post-conviction relief." The trial court denied the motion, and Schoicket filed a timely notice of appeal.

Schoicket continues to argue on appeal that, because she is indigent, she is entitled to a transcript and various documents at government expense for the purpose of pursing post-conviction relief. It is true that "an indigent, on appeal, is entitled as a matter of right to a free copy of the transcript of trial court proceedings in which he has been a party." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Mitchell v. State, 280 Ga. 802, 802 (1), 633 S.E.2d 539 (2006). However,

[w]hile an indigent is entitled to a copy of his trial transcript for a direct appeal of his conviction, such is not the case in collateral post-conviction proceedings. After the time for appeal has expired there is no due process or equal protection right to a free copy of one's court records absent a showing of necessity or justification.

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) McDowell v. Balkcom, 246 Ga. 611, 272 S.E.2d 280 (1980). Here, we are well outside the time for appeal, and Schoicket has failed to make any showing of necessity or justification. See Shelby v. McDaniel, 266 Ga. 215, 215, 465 S.E.2d 433 (1996) (recognizing that, after the time to appeal has expired, a copy of a pending or proposed habeas petition should be attached to the pleading seeking records at government expense). Schoicket's untimely motion is thus a nullity, which should have been dismissed below, and cannot sustain an appeal. See Henderson v. State, 303 Ga. 241 (2), 811 S.E.2d 388 (2018). This appeal, therefore, is dismissed. Id.

Appeal dismissed.

Hines, C.J., Melton, P.J., Benham, Nahmias, Blackwell, Boggs, and Peterson, JJ., concur.  