
    [Civ. No. 4321.
    First Appellate District, Division Two.
    July 11, 1922.]
    HERBERT W. ERSKINE, Petitioner, v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr., et al., Respondents.
    
       Municipal Corporations—¡Recovery op Taxes Paid Under Protest —Payment op Judgment—Levy op Tax—Constitutional Law.— Peremptory writ of mandate issued on the authority of Oscar Seyman Brother (o Corporation) v. Bdwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.
    PROCEEDING- in Mandamus to require the levy and collection of a tax sufficient to pay a judgment' against a municipality. Writ granted.
    The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Oscar Reyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.
    Keyes & Erskine for Petitioner.
    George Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.
   THE COURT.

Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Richards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.  