
    Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Company v. Eno Hinshaw.
    
      Practice — Conflict of Evidence.
    
    Where the record presents only questions of fact arising upon a conflict of evidence, this court will not interfere.
    [Opinion filed November 20, 1886.]
    Appeal from the County Court of McLean County; the Hon. R. M. Benjamin, Judge, presiding.
    Mr. Frank M. Hamilton, for appellant.
    Mr. W. B. Carlock, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellee recovered judgment for $10, as damages for the loss of a cow killed on appellant’s road. We find in the record only questions of fact arising upon a conflict of evidence, and therefore can not interfere.

Affirmed.  