
    CASSANOVA v. STATE.
    (No. 3417.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 10, 1915.)
    Criminal Law <&wkey;1124^-ApPEAL—Record.
    Denial of new trial because the verdict 'is contrary to the law and the evidence is not reviewable, where no statement of the evidence is in the record.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2939, 2946-294S; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1124.]
    Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. S. Anderson, Judge.
    G. Cassanova was convicted of crime, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary. .

The only ground in the motion for a new trial claims that a new trial should be granted “because the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence.” As no statement of the evidence heard on the trial accompanies the record before us, we cannot review that ground.

The judgment is affirmed. 
      <S&wkey;For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     