
    Broaden v. The State. Poe v. The State.
    ■Simmons, C. J. — 1. It is well settled law in this State that the denial of a motion to quash a criminal accusation is no ground for a new trial. In these cases there should have been motions in arrest of judgment, or direct exception to the refusal to quash.
    .2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
    December 21,1894.
    Accusation of shooting into a car of a passenger-train. Before Judge Westmoreland. Criminal court ■of Atlanta. November term, 1894.
    Robert L. Rodsers, for plaintiffs in error.
    Lewis W. Thomas, solicitor, contra.
    
   Judgment in each case affirmed.  