
    Asa B. Hogins versus Joseph Arnold.
    
      June 28th.
    
    After a verdict for the plaintiff in this action, which was debt upon a bond, judgment was arrested, and it was held, that the defendant was entitled to costs, by virtue of St. 1784, c. 28, § 9. And see Revised Stat. c. 121, § 1.
    
      S. D. Parker, for the plaintiff,
    cited Brown v. Austin, 1 Mass. R. 208.
    
      Leland, for the defendant,
    cited Hart v. Fitzgerald, 2 Mass R. 512; Smith v. Floyd, 2 Pick. 275.
     