
    ARARAD INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Plaintiff-counter-defendant—Appellee, v. AFSHAR, INC., a California corporation, dba Afshar Jewelers; Ghazaros A. Ghazarossian, a California resident; Seyed Dehbozorgi, a California resident, Defendants, Kevork Toramanian, an individual; Zaven Toramanian, an individual, Counter-defendants, and, Zoreh Afshar, a California resident; Homayoun Afshar, a California resident, aka Ian Afshar; Hosain Dehbozorgi, a California resident, aka Seyed Dehbozorgi;, Defendants—Appellants, Z & H General Trading, Inc., a California corporation, dba Aqua Marin Watches, Defendant-counter-claimant—Appellant.
    No. 02-56324.
    D.C. No. CV-02-00420-GAF.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.
    
    Decided Jan. 22, 2003.
    Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

This preliminary injunction appeal comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our inquiry is limited to whether the district court has abused its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact. Does 1-5 v. Chandler, 83 F.3d 1150, 1152 (9th Cir.1996).

The record before us shows that the district court did not rely upon an erroneous legal premise or abuse its discretion by preliminarily enjoining the activities encompassed within the court’s order filed July 3, 2002. Id.; Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, Inc., 686 F.2d 750, 753 (9th Cir.1982) (stating legal standards governing issuance of preliminary injunction). Moreover, the court’s factual findings are not clearly erroneous. Chandler, 83 F.3d at 1152. Our disposition will affect the rights of the parties only until the district court renders final judgment. Sports Form, 686 F.2d at 752.

Accordingly, the district court’s order is

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     
      
      . Appellants' motion to withdraw their request to take judicial notice is granted.
     