
    Anna M. Karuzas, Appellant, v. Ætna Life Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, Respondent
   Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

McNamee, J.

(concurring). I concur on the ground that whether or not the sections of the policy to which objections are made are “ printed with the same prominence as the benefits to which they apply,” in this case is a question of fact.  