
    R.E.K., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 80259.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 16, 2002.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 29, 2002.
    Michael A. Gross, Stephen M. Ryals, Ryals & Soffer, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Robert T. Haar, Haar & Woods, LLP, Susan E. Bindler, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the summary judgment of trial court in defendant’s favor. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  