
    Ruoff v. Dowerman et al.
    [No. 9,765.
    Filed March 4, 1919.]
    
      Appeal.—Review.—Conflicting Evidence.—Conclusiveness of Judgment.—Where each of the questions presented on appeal would require for its determination a review of conflicting evidence, the judgment of the trial court is conclusive, and must be affirmed.
    From Floyd Circuit Court; J ohn M. Paris, Judge.
    Action between William F. Ruoff and Susie B. Dowerman and others. From the judgment rendered, the former appeals.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Alexander Dowling, for appellant.
    
      Bedinger S Swearingen and Charles A. Hunt, for appellees. •
   Remy, J.

Each of the questions presented by this appeal would require for its determination a review of conflicting evidence. Under such circumstances, the judgment of the trial court is conclusive, and, on the authority of Nicholson v. Smith (1916), 60 Ind. App. 385, 110 N. E. 1007, the judgment is affirmed.  