
    MORGAN v. THUR.
    No. 8304
    Opinion Filed Jan. 8, 1918.
    (169 Pac. 648.)
    Error from Eish-ict Court, Greer County; W. A. Edwards, Judge.
    Action of «forcible entry and detainer by Win. Thur against Elisha Morgan. Judgment for plaintiff in justice’s court, and from a judgment of the district court, .dismissing an appeal, defendant brings error.
    Reversed, and judgment directed upon stipulation.
    B. E. Van Eyke, for plaintiff in error.
    A. M. Stewart, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This is an appeal upon petition in error and transcript from the judgment of the district court, dismissing an appeal from a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace in an action of forcible entry and detainer, awarding the possession of the southwest quarter of section 33, township 6 north, range 21 west, to the defendant in error. AV.m. Thur. The appeal was dismissed by the district court on account of irregularities in the appeal bond, and an appeal is prosecuted ¡by the plaintiff in error from that order.

The record was filed in this court May 13, 1916, and the cause was regularly sub-miDed on the 8th day of October, 1917. On the 21st d.ay of August, 1917, the plaintiff in error filed in the cause a motion for judgment, asking that the cause be reversed, and that judgment be entered awarding the possession of the premises above described to him, and that he be taxed with the costs on appeal, and that the costs of the lower court be taxed against the defendant in error. To tljig motion is attached a stipulation, signed by the defendant in error and sworn 'o by him before a notary .public, agreeing that such a judgment shall be entered. AVhile this stipulation is of an unusual character, it bears the earmarks of originality and genuineness and is accepted as presented.

It therefore appears that the appeal shor'd lie sustained, and the cause remanded to the district court of Greer county, with directions to vacate the order dismissing the appeal and to enter judgment in said cause awarding possession of the land above described +o the plaintiff in error, and taxing the costs of the lower court against the defendant in error, .Wm. Thur, and those of the appellate court against the plaintiff in error, per the motion and stipulation of the parties filed herein.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  