
    Charles Crane v. The State.
    No. 17662.
    Delivered June 26, 1935.
    The opinion states the case.
    
      W. J. Townsend, of Lufkin, for appellant.
    
      Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.
   CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is unlawfully selling squirrels; the punishment, a fine of twenty-five dollars.

The prosecution proceeded under Art. 884, P. C., which reads in part as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale * * * any * * * wild game animal, dead or alive, or any part thereof, protected by this chapter, except as hereinafter provided. This article, and all other articles in this chapter, shall apply to any * * * animal coming from without this State; and in prosecutions for violations of this chapter it shall be no defense that such * * * animal was not taken or killed within this State.”

We quote the charging part of the complaint as follows: “Charles Crane on or about the 26th day of October, A. D. 1934 and before the making and filing of this complaint, in the county of Angelina and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully sell and offer for sale to C. H. Doak wild game, to-wit squirrels.”

The information follows the complaint.

Art. 892, P. C., reads as follows: “Wild deer, wild elk, wild antelope, wild Rocky Mountain sheep, wild back bear, and wild gray and red squirrels, cat squirrels or fox squirrels, are hereby declared to be game animals within the meaning of this Act.”

We quote from Webster’s International Dictionary as follows: “Among the common North American squirrels are the gray squirrel * * * and its black variety; the fox or cat squirrel * * * which is a large species and variable in color, the southern variety being frequently black, while the northern and western varieties are usually gray or rusty brown; the “red squirrel * * *; the striped, or chipping, squirrel * * *; and the California gray squirrel. Several other species inhabit Mexico and Central America. * *

Appellant insists that the complaint and information are fundamentally defective in failing to specify the kind of squirrels alleged to have been sold. We think this contention should be sustained, as it appears that there are several species not enumerated in Art. 892, supra. Under the express terms of Art. 884, supra, the sale, etc. of wild game animals is restricted to such animals as are protected by Chap. 6 of Title 13, P. C. As to squirrels said chapter protects wild gray and red squirrels, and cat squirrels or fox squirrels. Art. 892, supra. It follows that the general allegation that the game animals sold consisted of squirrels is insufficient.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.  