
    Quinton JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D01-5055.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 6, 2002.
    Rehearing Denied April 9, 2002.
    Quinton Jackson, Miami, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.  