
    Disciplinary Counsel v. Plough.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Plough, 128 Ohio St.3d 1203, 2011-Ohio-1082.]
    (No. 2009-2341
    Submitted February 3, 2011
    Decided February 10, 2011.)
   {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Joseph Plough, Attorney Registration No. 0012818, last known business address in Ravenna, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 21, 2010, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Plough, 126 Ohio St.3d 167, 2010-Ohio-3298, 931 N.E.2d 575.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.  