
    3920.
    3921.
    3922.
    3923.
    3924.
    MAPLES (Gurly) v. THE STATE. MAPLES (Gary) v. THE STATE. Cato v. THE STATE. TABB v. THE STATE. STANTON v. THE STATE.
    DECIDED MARCH 19, 1912.
    MotiQns to dismiss wrii of error.
    W. I. Geer, for plaintiffs in error.
    J.A. Lang, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, conlra.
   Pottle, J.

.Th~ coitrt is without jurisdiction of a bill of exceptions cornplaining solely of tile refusal of the trial judge to permit a demand for ti~ial in a criminal case to be entered upon the minutes. Sharpe v. State, ante 212 (73 S. E. 33). Upon motion of the plaintiffs in error, directic~n is given that the copy bill of exceptions in each of the fdregoing ~ses, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, ~ay operate as exceptions pendente lite.

Writs of error dismissed, with direction.  