
    Graham vs. Sellers.
    Where suit was brought for a trespass which damaged “mill timber,” it should appear that a trespass was committed upon mill timber. That trees were wrongfully used for the purpose of manufacturing turpentine, was not alone sufficient, where it was not shown that any of the trees so used were of that kind for damaging which suit was brought.
    Judgment reversed.
    April 24, 1883.
   Oraweord, Justice.  