
    (Reap. Dec. 8526)
    B. & S. Prod. Co. et al. v. United States
    Entry No. 849755, etc.
    (Decided January 20, 1956)
    
      Barnes, Richardson & Colburn for the plaintiffs.
    
      Warren E. Burger, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of fact entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items of merchandise enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, and that such values were as set forth in said schedule “B.”

I further find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items of merchandise enumerated in schedule “0,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, and that such values were as set forth in said schedule “C.”

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Schedule “B”

Items Foreign value

13 DM 6.70 per doz., less 2%, plus cost of cases, as invoiced

21 tt tjr U ft tt it it tt it tt tt (C

22 tt ¶ 7Q tt tt it a u it tt tt tt tt

24 a g 11 tt u u u it it tt it it

25 tt g 0Q tt tt tt tt tt a a tt tt it

28 tt 22 00 U U (< l< li u u 11 11 u

81 a g qq tt tt tt it tt tt tt tt tt tt

82 tt g QQ tt tt tt tt it tt tt tt It tt

91 tt ¶ 25 u u u <( 11 u {< 11 l( u

92 a ¶ 25 11 u u u il li 11 (l u {(

93 ti g yQ tt tt tt tt tt tt tí tt tt tt

94 tt g tt ti tt tt tt tt tt tt tt tt

99 tt 22 go lt u ei e( ce <e 11 (( 11 Ci

Schedule “C”

Items Cost of -production

11 Invoiced unit price, plus cost of cases, as invoiced

12 DM 9.60 per doz., less 41^%, plus cost of cases, as invoiced

14 Invoiced unit price, plus cost of cases, as invoiced

15

41

42

43

44

45 DM 9.40 per doz., less 41}¿%, plus cost of cas(es, as invoiced

46 tt Q it tí ti ti tt ti tt t it tt

63 Invoiced unit price, plus cost of cases, as invoiced

64

65

66 DM 6.70 per doz., less 41]4,% plus cost of cases, as invoiced

67 it g gQ tt tt tt tt tt tt tt it It tt  