
    728 A.2d 224
    IN THE MATTER OF ROCCO F. SENNA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.
    May 4, 1999.
   ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that ROCCO F. SENNA of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1942, be disbarred for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to keep client trust funds separate) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation),

And the Board’s report having stated, inter alia,

Based on the overwhelming documentary evidence, as well as respondent’s admissions, it is dear that respondent knowingly misappropriated client funds. Emerging from this record is the unfortunate picture that respondent was not aware that “borrowing” money from his clients is prohibited. Respondent presents a sympathetic figure. He has practiced law since 1942, a period of fifty-six years. He has no prior disciplinary history. At the timé of the Board hearing, respondent was seventy-nine years old. He must be, nonetheless, charged with knowledge of the applicable rules and caselaw.

And ROCCO F. SENNA having been Ordered to Show Cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined,

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROCCO F. SENNA is disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from, the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that ROCCO F. SENNA be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ROCCO F. SENNA pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.  