
    RICHARDO, A Minor, By and Through his custodian Roque DE LA FUENTE II; Regina, a Minor, By and Through Her Custodian Roque De La Fuente II; Roberto Schoeder-Huerta, A minor, by and through his custodian Roque De La Fuente II; Felipe Zavier, A Minor, by and through His Custodian Roque De La Fuente II; Katayoun, A Minor, by and through Her Custodian Roque De La Fuente II; Roque De La Fuente, II, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, A Federal Entity Defendant, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 04-56373.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 2007.
    Filed Feb. 15, 2007.
    Bradley L. Jacobs, Attorney at Law, Michael H. Fish, Esq., Niddrie & Fish, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Charles L. Cope, II, Esq., FDIC-Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: KOZINSKI and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

At oral argument, plaintiffs’ counsel represented that his clients no longer own any bank stock. As such, all claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are moot. See Jones Intercable of San Diego, Inc. v. City of Chula Vista, 80 F.3d 320, 328 (9th Cir.1996). Plaintiffs’ remaining claim for damages arising out of a due process violation is barred by FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994), which held that a Bivens action cannot be brought against a federal agency. Id. at 484-85, 114 S.Ct. 996.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     