
    Before the Second Division,
    December 18, 1951
    No. 56174.
    protest 170516-K (New York).
    Associated Metals & Minerals Corporation v. United States,
   Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the only evidence offered was an amended report of the United States Customs Laboratory, which was received in evidence as exhibit 1. It was conceded by counsel for the Government that the original laboratory report stating that the merchandise consisted of “needle antimony,” and which was the basis of the collector’s action, is erroneous. Upon the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.  