
    Chernor A. SEISAY, Jr., Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 03-70663,
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 10, 2004.
    
    Decided May 20, 2004.
    Chernor A. Seisay, Jr., Lancaster, CA, pro se.
    Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Michael P. Lindemann, Esq., Douglas E. Ginsburg, Lyle Jentzer, Jennifer A. Parker, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Chernor A. Seisay, Jr., a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture, and ordering him removed.

Seisay’s sole contention on appeal is that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his removal hearing. We lack jurisdiction to consider this contention because Seisay did not raise it with the BIA. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 819 (9th Cir.2003). We therefore dismiss Seisay’s petition.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     