
    Curtis Woodrow DRAUGHN, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. EMBERS IMPERIAL HOUSE et al., Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.
    No. 35960.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 15, 1967.
    William M. Holt of the Law Offices of John A. Chilldon, Tampa, for petitioner-cross-respondent.
    Charles A. Zinn, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for respondents-cross-petitioners.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross-petition we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The cross-petition is denied.

The Petitioner’s petition for attorney’s fees is also denied. The petition filed by Petitioner for defending against the cross-petition is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and TPIOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.  