
    Argued August 22,
    affirmed September 12,
    reconsideration denied October 19, 1977,
    petition for review pending
    In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of QURAISHI, Appellant, and QURAISHI, Respondent.
    
    (No. D76-04-04731, CA 7892)
    569 P2d 45
    Susan Elizabeth Reese, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
    Ralph C. Spooner, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Williams, Spooner & Graves, P.C., Salem.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Richardson and Johnson, Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

In this dissolution-of-marriage proceeding the mother appeals from that portion of the decree which awarded the custody of the now six-year-old daughter of the parties to the father. The substance of the mother’s argument is that "[a]lthough morally and physically the parties are equally fit, the evidence demonstrates that [the mother] is much more suited, emotionally, for her parenting responsibilities.” The trial judge found that "both parties are good parents,” but gave the edge to the father and awarded custody to him. The record does not disclose any basis for reversal. Starin and Starin, 29 Or App 557, 564 P2d 748, Sup Ct review denied (1977); Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or App 251, 506 P2d 535 (1973).

Affirmed. No costs to either party.  