
    (44 South. 856.)
    No. 16,838.
    STATE v. MARKS.
    (Nov. 4, 1907.)
    Cbiminal Law — Appeal—Afi-ikmancb.
    In the absence of assignment or suggestion of error, the judgment will be affirmed, where the record discloses no patent illegality in the proceedings.
    [Ed. Note. — Eor cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 3, Appeal and Error, § 4454.]
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; Frank D. Chretien, Judge.
    Samuel S. Marks was convicted of crime, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Henriques & Dunn, for appellant. Walter Guión, Atty. Gen., James Porter Parker, Dist. Atty., and Henry Mooney, Asst. Dist. Atty. (Lewis Guión, of counsel), for the State.
   LAND, J.

Defendant was duly convicted and sentenced for the crime of assault with intent to commit rape, and has appealed.

The record contains no bill of exception, and error has neither been assigned nor suggested. The proceedings appear to be regular.

Judgment affirmed.  