
    Reinchild v. State of Indiana.
    [No. 24,229.
    Filed June 7, 1923.]
    Statutes.— Title.— A conviction for the possession of intoxicating liquor under Acts 1917 p. 15 as amended by Acts 1921 p. 736 held invalid, for the reason that the title of the act of 1917 was not sufficiently comprehensive to include the amendment.
    From Delaware Circuit Court; William A. Thompson, Judge.
    Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Russell Reinchild for possession of intoxicating liquor. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.
    
      Reversed.
    
    (Ewbank, J., dissents.)'
    
      Phil B. O’Niel, for appellant.
    
      U. S. Lesh, Attorney-General and Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Deputy Attorney-General, for the State.
   Per Curiam.

From a judgment upon a verdict of guilty, under a charge of possessing intoxicating liquor (Acts 1921 p. 736, §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1921), appellant appeals and claims error, in the overruling of his motion to quash the affidavit.

On the authority of Crabbs v. State (1923), ante 248, and Powell v. State (1923), ante 258, the judgment is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to sustain the motion to quash.

Ewbank, J., dissents.  