
    Edmund W. Hathaway, Respondent, v. James P. Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Charles D. Smith and Others, Respondents.
   We think that the obligation imposed upon the plaintiff and the defendant Titcomb^ should be enlarged so as to require them to respond to the partnership. The judgment should be modified in t as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Jenks, P. J., Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.  