
    George M. LaMonte, complainant, v. Harvey Mott et al., defendants.
    [Decided October 18th, 1921.]
    Appeal of Harvey Mott and others.
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported ante p. -2®9.
    
    
      Mr. Otto A. FI tie f el, for the complainant.
    
      Mr. Roger Hinds, for the defendants.
   Per Cuetam.

The decree a]>pealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, TrenchÍrd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Iyalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Heppenheimeb, Williams — 11.

For reversal — None.

For modification — Gardner—1.  