
    Hart v. Ware.
    It is the well-settled law of the court that where there was no motion for a new trial the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that the verdict was not warranted by the evidence.
    Error from Ked'River.
    
      J. T. Mills, for plaintiff in error.
    
      A. Morrill, for defendant in error.
   Wiieeler, J.

The record in this ease discloses no ruling of the court upon any question of law. The sole question is whether the verdict of the jury was warranted by the evidence. There was no motion for a new trial; and it is tlie settled law of the court that where there was no motion for a new trial the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that tho verdict was not warranted by the evidence. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.  