
    Dawn V. MARTIN; Miguel Gallardo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Johannes BRONDUM; Long and Foster Real Estate, Inc.; Long and Foster Companies; Long and Foster Realtors; Patricia Knight, a/k/a Patricia Knight Lambert; Susan Haughton, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-1644
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 29, 2016
    Decided: August 10, 2016
    Dawn V. Martin, LAW OFFICES OF DAWN V. MARTIN, Washington, D.C„ for Appellants. Susan F. Earman, FRIED-LANDER, FRIEDLANDER & EAR-MAN, PC, McLean, Virginia; Mikhael D. Charnoff, PERRY CHARNOFF PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dawn V. Martin and Miguel Gallardo appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. Rule 60(b) motion challenging the taxation of costs and denying their request to submit color photographs by electronic means. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Brondum, No. 1:11-cv-01118-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  