
    PETER S. MOORE, Respondent, v. DAVID H. BIXBY, Appellant.
    
      Statute of frauds—ddimery of personal pi’operty.
    
    Mere words are not sufficient to constitute a delivery of personal property. (Good v. Curtiss, 31 How. Pr., 4; Shindler v. Houston, 1 N. Y., 261-265; Caulkins v. Hellman, 47 id., 449.)
    
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee, in an action on an account.
    
      E. H. Prindle, for the appellant.
    
      George A. Haven, for the respondent.
    
      
       See Ham v. Van Orden, ante, page 709.— [Rep.
    
   Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event, and referee discharged.  