
    20129.
    Ivey v. The State.
    Decided December 10, 1929.
    
      W. 0. Little, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. B. Gibbs, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in either of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. While this case is dependent upon circumstantial evidence alone, the evidence is sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoneur.  