
    TERRELL H. HALLMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued December 7, 1965
    Decided January 24, 1966.
    
      
      Mr. Edward (?. D’Alessandro argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Friedman & D’Alessandro, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Eugene T. Urbanialc, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney, Mr. Urbanialc, of counsel).
   The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding Hallman attacked the order of the State Parole Board revoking his parole and recommitting him to prison. It now appears that since the revocation he has been convicted of crime again in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. That offense of which he has been found guilty in substantial part was the basis upon which the revocation was based. Under the circumstances the issue presented to us is now moot. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weiftraub and Justices Jacobs, Erafcis, Proctor and Hall — 5.

Opposed — None.  