
    O’Neil, Appellant, vs. City of Hudson, Respondent.
    
      April 7
    
    May 10, 1932.
    
    For the appellant there were briefs by Varnum & Varnum of Hudson, attorneys, and W. T. Doan' of New Richmond of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Doar.
    
    For the respondent there was a brief by William B. Webster, city attorney of Hudson, and White & White of River Falls of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Webster and Mr. Ferris M. White.
    
   Rosenberry, C. J.

The questions raised in this case are identical with those of McGuire v. Hudson, a companion case (ante, p. 233, 242 N. W. 555), and for the reasons there stated the mandate in this case will be the same as the mandate in that.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.  