
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Samuel RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-41466
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Jan. 25, 2016.
    Grover Glenn Roque-Jaekson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Plano, TX, Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Kevin Blake Ross, Law Office of Kevin B. Ross, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Samuel Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ramos has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Ramos’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See . United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ramos’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from' further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir, R. 42.2, Ramos’s pro se motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     