
    Georgiana M. ALBERT and Susan E. Gasluoine, appellants, v. Charles P. BUCKLEY md William W. Buckley, respondents.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    June 9, 1916.)
    Finding of fact No. Í in the referee’s report, so far as it finds that ;he services and expenditures therein recited tave not been paid for, is hereby reversed, and lisp conclusion 4 in said report; and the affirmative finding is made by this court that the igreement between the parties, recited in findng of fact. No. 8, was also to the effect that ;he defendants’ share in the ultimate profits ¡hould include and be taken by them as full •.ompensation for all their services rendered for ;he plaintiffs in reference to the said property pefore, during and after the said partition ación. The judgment is hereby modified, so as to itrike therefrom the recovery by defendants of .he sum off $818.10, with interest thereon, and •educing accordingly the judgment in favor off .he defendants to the sum of §491.86 costs as ;axed, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
   Jenks, P. J., and Thomas, Mills, Rich, and Putnam, JJ., concur.  