
    The Metropolitan Rubber Company et al. v. The Atlanta Rubber Company et al.
    
    The evidence not showing any abuse of discretion by the judge below in refusing to grant an injunction and appoint a receiver, the
    March 26, 1892.
    By two Justices.
    Argued at tlie last term.
    Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Marshall J. •Clarke. Pulton superior court. January 28, 1892.
    The Metropolitan Rubber Co. and the New Jersey Rubber Shoe Co., creditors by account of the Atlanta Rubber Co., brought their petition for injunction and receiver, in which certain mortgages which had been given by the Atlanta company on its stock of goods, notes, accounts, etc., and which had been foreclosed, were attacked as fraudulent and void as against the petitioners. The pleadings and evidence are voluminous and conflicting, and an extended statement of them would not be useful here. To the denial of an interlocutory injunction and receiver, and to various rulings at the hearing, the plaintiffs excepted.
   Judgment is affirmed.

"Walter R. Broayn and Culberson & Hunt, for plaintiffs.

Matson & Hill, Blalock & Birney and Ellis & Gray, for defendants.  