
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Germaine JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-30818
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    May 17, 2007.
    
      Howard Cobb Parker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Wayne Joseph Blanchard, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants Appellant.
    Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

John Germaine Jackson was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). Jackson was sentenced to 24 months of imprisonment and a two-year term of supervised release.

This court will uphold a jury’s verdict if a reasonable trier of fact could conclude from the evidence that the elements of the offense were established beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Delgado, 256 F.3d 264, 273-74 (5th Cir.2001). The evidence, both direct and circumstantial, is viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict; all credibility determinations and reasonable inferences are to be resolved in favor of the verdict. United States v. Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d 907, 910, 911 (5th Cir.1995).

At trial, Jackson stipulated that he is a convicted felon and that the firearm found at the scene was in, or affected, interstate commerce. Consequently, the only fact for the jury to decide was whether Jackson was in knowing possession of a firearm. See United States v. Ybarra, 70 F.3d 362, 365 (5th Cir.1995). Jackson argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him because none of the Government’s witnesses testified that they saw him in possession of the firearm on the day of his arrest. Jackson also argues that there was no evidence that the area where the firearm was found could not have been accessed by the public, and contends that although the Government could have obtained fingerprint, DNA, or other forensic evidence, to link him to the firearm, it failed to do so.

Given the evidence, however, the jury could have drawn the plausible inference that Jackson had a gun in his possession and attempted to conceal it from police. See United States v. McCowan, 469 F.3d 386, 390-91 (5th Cir.2006). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Jackson possessed the firearm. See United States v. Delgado, 256 F.3d 264, 273-74 (5th Cir.2001); Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d at 910.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     