
    DAUGHERTY v. CALIFORNIA.
    No. 19,
    Mise.
    Decided March 13, 1967.
    Pétitioner pro- se.
    
    
      Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Per Curiam. '

The motion for leave to proceed in Jorma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.  