
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio PEREZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-50476.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted May 25, 2010.
    
    Filed June 10, 2010.
    Rebecca Suzanne Kanter, Assistant U.S., Southern District of California, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Vincent James Brunkow, Esquire, Assistant Appellate Supervisor, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Rogelio Perez-Gonzalez appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Perez-Gonzalez contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L 1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because his prior convictions for assault with a deadly weapon, in violation of California Penal Code § 245(a)(1), and inflicting corporal injury on a spouse, in violation of California Penal Code § 273.5, do not qualify as crimes of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1191-97 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that a conviction under California Penal Code § 245(a)(1) is categorically a “crime of violence” under the Guidelines); see also United States v. Laurico-Yeno, 590 F.3d 818, 823 (9th Cir.2010) (holding that a conviction under California Penal Code § 273.5 is categorically a “crime of violence” under the Guidelines).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     