
    CHIDESTER against DRAKE.
    OS OEKTIOBABI.
    
      JRunyan, attorney for plaintiff.
   Pennington, J.

The first, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth errors assigned, are not supported by the [*] record. The second and fourth, state no cause of reversal, even if true. The third complains of insufficiency in the state of demand, which consists of a single charge, of a balance on settlement of account, on or about [658] the 29th December, 1810, $30.04, which is fully sufficient. I am of opinion, that judgment be affirmed.

The other judges concurred.

Judgment affirmed.

Cited is Carter v. Lackey, Spenc. 608.  