
    (October 22, 1900.)
    TANNAHILL v. JOHNSON.
    [62 Pac. 1116.]
    This case in all respects like the case of Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 279, and the syllabus in that case applies to this ease in every particular.
    APPEAL from District Court, Nez Perces County.
    B. F. Tweedy and James W. Reid, for Appellant.
    Brief filed in Ponting v. Isaman applies to this case.
    E. O'Neill and Miles S. Johnson, for Respondent.
    This case, following the decision in case of Ponting v. Isaman, the brief filed in that case applied to this.
   Per CURIAM.

This proceeding is similar in all respects to that in the case of Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 283 (decided by this court at the present term), 62 Pac. 680, and is in the same condition in all respects. What we said in the last-named case applies here, and is decisive of this appeal, for which reasons the judgment appealed from is reversed, and this proceeding remanded to the district court, with directions to proceed herein in the same manner in all respects as directed in the opinion in the case of Ponting v. Isaman, supra. Costs of appeal awarded to appellant.  