
    The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co., plaintiff in error, v. Robert James, defendant in error.
    [Filed March 20, 1889.]
   Maxwell, J.

The facts in this case are substantially the same as in the case of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. James, just decided, and the same judgment will be entered.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Judges concur.  