
    Pleva, by guardian ad litem, Respondent, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant.
    
      January 12
    
    February 7, 1933.
    
    For the appellant there was a brief by .Shaw, Muskat & Paitlsen of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Carl Muskat.
    
    For the respondent there was a brief by Hammersley & Torke of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Charles Ham-mersley.
    
   Fritz, J.

This case involves the same facts and questions of law as in the companion case of Zilles v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co., which is decided herewith (ante, p. 564, 246 N. W. 693). The decision in that case rules this case.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.  