
    No. 54900.
    Crompton-Richmond Company, Inc. v. United States,
    protest 162344-K (New York).
   Opinion by

Rao, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. An examination of the official papers revealed that more than 60 days elapsed between the date of liquidation of the entry and the date of the filing of protest. The protest was therefore dismissed as untimely.  