
    Wayne A. SEARE; Marinette Tedoco, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA Bank of New York, ON BEHALF OF TRUSTEE FOR the CERTIFICATE-HOLDERS OF THE CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-18CB, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-18CB; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-15916
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted November 15, 2017 
    
    Filed November 22, 2017
    Wayne A. Seare, Pro Se
    Marinette Tedoco, Pro Se
    Natalie L. Winslow, Esquire, Attorney, Akerman LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees Bank of New York Mellon, CWALT, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Seaside Trustee, Inc.
    Michael K. Wall, Managing Senior Counsel, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee
    Casey Joel Nelson, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Ap-pellee Wedgewood, Inc.
    Casey Joel Nelson, Michael K. Wall, Managing Senior Counsel, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee Wedgewood, LLC
    Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

• Wayne A. Seare and Marinette Tedoco appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action related to foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ wrongful foreclosure claims because plaintiffs failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants failed to comply with Nevada law. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 107.080 (setting forth requirements of a trustee sale under Nevada law); see also Edelstein v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 286 P.3d 249, 258 (Nev. 2012) (en banc) (explaining that under Nevada law, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. may properly act as beneficiary of a trust deed, and an entity has authority to pursue foreclosure when it is entitled to enforce both the deed of trust and the note).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     