
    Ex Parte Frank Martin.
    No. 2761.
    Decided October 14, 1913.
    Murder—Bail—Practice on Appeal.
    Where, upon appeal from a habeas corpus proceeding, it was shown that appellant was entitled to a reduction of bail, the case will be reversed and proper bail fixed.
    Appeal from the District. Court of Brooks. Tried below before the Hon. W. B. Hopkins.
    Appeal from a habeas corpus proceeding reducing bail.
    The opinion states the case.
    No brief on file for appellant.
    
      C. E. Lane, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant in this case was indicted for murder. Hpon a habeas corpus hearing the district judge properly held he was entitled to bail but fixed his bond at $7500.

This appeal is prosecuted with a view of having the amount of the bail reduced, claiming the amount fixed is excessive. The evidence on this point showed that the appellant’s father was dead and that he had no relatives or property with which tp secure his bond; that some of his friends, who are able, had determined that they would sign his bond but not for a greater amount than $2500. Upon consideration of the whole evidence we have reached the conclusion that his bail should be and is fixed in the sum of $2500.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed with instructions that upon his execution of the proper bond in said sum he shall be discharged as provided by law.

Reversed and remanded and bail reduced.  