
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ferdinand Richard BALCAR, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-10375.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Oct. 15, 2013.
    
    Filed Oct. 22, 2013.
    Camille W. Damm, Assistant U.S., USLV-Offíce of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USRE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Ferdinand Richard Balear, Jr., Mendota, CA, pro se.
    Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Ferdinand Richard Balear, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting his motion to adjust his restitution payment schedule. We affirm.

Balear contends that his 1997 jury conviction for four counts of armed bank robbery should be vacated because the government failed to prove at trial that the institutions he robbed were federally insured. Because he raises no challenges to the order being appealed, we affirm.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     