
    James Antonio SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103172
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: August 23, 2016
    Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Antonio Smith appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).  