
    Shambhubhai PATEL, Ushaben Patel, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 08-2586-ag.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    April 30, 2009.
    Wayne A. Francis, Hartford, CT, for Appellant.
    John Williams, United States Department of Justice (Terri León-Benner, Gregory G. Katsas, Barry J. Pettinato, on the brief), Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    PRESENT: Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, Hon. DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges, and Hon. ERIC N. VITALIANO, District Judge.
    
      
       Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), we have substituted Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., for former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey as the respondent in this case.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Eric N. Vilaliano of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioners Shambhubhai and Ushaben Patel appeal from the denial of their application for adjustment of status and the denial of their motion to remand. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case, and the issues raised by the petition.

Section 242(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), states: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law ... no court shall have jurisdiction to review—(i) any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section ... 1255 of this title.” 8 U.S.C. § 1255 is the statute under which the Patels sought an adjustment of status. Because the Patels have not raised a color-able constitutional claim or a question of law in their petition, INA § 242(a)(2)(B)(i) precludes our jurisdiction to consider this petition. See Guyadin v. Gonzales, 449 F.3d 465, (2d Cir.2006), see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition is hereby DISMISSED.  