
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose DEL CARMEN RANGEL-CARBAJAL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-40147.
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Nov. 21, 2003.
    James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, Katherine L. Haden, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Enrique Alvino Garza, Hebbronville, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before REAYLEY, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Jose Del Carmen Rangel-Carbajal (“Rangel”) appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine and aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine. Rangel argues that the identification of him from a single photograph display violated his due process rights. This argument is without merit. Although the single photograph display was impermissibly suggestive, see Hudson v. Blackburn, 601 F.2d 785, 788 (5th Cir.1979), an examination of the totality of the circumstances reveals that the suggestiveness did not lead to “a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.” United States v. Burbridge, 252 F.3d 775, 780 (5th Cir.2001) (citations omitted); see also Allen v. Estelle, 568 F.2d 1108, 1113-14 (5th Cir.1978).

Rangel also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. However, the evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, sufficiently established Ran-gel’s knowledgeable participation in a cocaine conspiracy. See United States v. Villarreal, 324 F.3d 319, 324 (5th Cir.2003) (knowledge of drug conspiracy may be inferred from large amount and value of cocaine in vehicle); United States v. Diaz-Carreon, 915 F.2d 951, 954-55 (5th Cir.1990) (guilty knowledge may be inferred from inconsistent statements and implausible explanations of defendant); United States v. Booker, 334 F.3d 406, 410 (5th Cir.2003) (uncorroborated co-conspirator testimony is sufficient to support a conviction unless legally incredible). The evidence was also sufficient to support Ran-gel’s aiding and abetting conviction. See United States v. Gonzales, 121 F.3d 928, 936 (5th Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     