
    Ex parte W. E. STEWART.
    No. 27337.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 20, 1954.
    No attorney on appeal.
    Wesley Dice, ‘State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
   BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an original application for a writ "of habeas corpus'to this Court, Relator being confined in the penitentiary under sentence of 2 to 7 yea'rs from Wichita ■ Coun•ty.

The judgment of the trial court, a jury .being, waived, adjpdged Relator guilty of the offense of “swindling with a worthless check.as charged in the indictment,” and that he be confined in the penitentiary for s.even years. ;

The indictment shows that the Relator was charged with the offense of obtaining personal property, with the intent to defraud by drawing a check in the amount of $50 or more without sufficient funds as defined in art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann. P.C. The indictment may be considered in construing the judgment and sentence. Such shows that Relator was here convicted of the offense defined by art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. Ex Parte King, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 231, 240 S.W.2d 777; Jones v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 241, 226 S.W.2d 437.

Relator contends that the judgment is void because a fine was not assessed as part of the punishment in addition to the penitentiary term, both being required by statute. Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., provides that, for a violation of this Act where the check or draft is in the amount of $50, or more, the punishment shall be by confinement in the penitentiary for not less than 2 years nor more than 10 years, and by a fine not exceeding $10,000.

The punishment here imposed was of the same character, as far as it went, as that prescribed by the statute and the judgment cannot be collaterally attacked on the ground that no fine was imposed. Lenore v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 417, 129 S.W.2d 657. This appears to be the rule in most jurisdictions. Ex Parte Clarke, 30 Okl.Cr. 259, 236 P. 66; Linningen v. Morgan, 8 Cir., 241 Fed. 645; Dillon v. State, 38 Ohio St. 586; and Annotation (Illegal or Erroneous Sentence as Grounds for Habeas Corpus. IV. Deficient Sentence), 76 A.L.R. 468 at page 505.

We have held however that on appeal a judgment assessing a punishment less than the minimum provided by law will be reversed. See Simmons v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 601, 245 S.W.2d 254.

We overrule Relator’s contention that the trial court, after waiver of trial by jury, is without power to assess the punishment upon a plea of guilty to an offense less than capital. Ex Parte Traxler, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 661, 184 S.W.2d 286.

The relief prayed for is denied.

Opinion approved by the Court.  