
    WALLACE v. STATE.
    (No. 4581.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 10, 1917.)
    Criminal Law &wkey;>1090(l) — «Review—Necessity oe Bill of Exceptions and Statement of Facts.
    In the absence of a statement of facts or bill of exceptions, the judgment will be affirmed, where no errors are disclosed in the record.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; C. A. Pippen, Judge.
    John Wallace was convicted of forgery, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, J.

Appellant was indicted and convicted of forgery, and punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. Therq are no errors disclosed in the record, and ihere is an absence of statement of facts and bill of exceptions.

The judgment is affirmed.  