
    George M. Janes, Respondent, v. John P. H. Janes et al., Defendants, and William F. Janes et al., Appellants.
    
      Beal property — partition — title by adverse possession.
    
    
      Janes v. Janes, 199 App. Div. 912, affirmed.
    (Argued October 5, 1923;
    decided October 23, 1923.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 5, 1921, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the Oneida County Court on trial without a jury. The action was in partition. The trial court, holding that one of the defendants had established a valid and effective title to the premises by adverse possession, directed a dismissal of the complaint.
    
      R. S. Johnson for appellants.
    
      W. M. Gallagher for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Ch. J., McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.  