
    Bainbridge et al.. Respondents, v. Lilienthal, Appellant.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
    
    July 22, 1892.)
    Appeal from special term, Kings county.
    Action by Henry C. Bainbridge and another against Maurice Lilienthal.
    Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J.
    
      Wüliam F. Handel, for appellant. Jackson & Burr, (Jas. A. Burr, Jr., of counsel,) for respondents.
   Dykman, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion of the defendant to compel the plaintiff to receive a notice of appeal from an order denying a motion to make a complaint more definite and certain. The appeal is entirely destitute of merit, and the order should be affirmed, with $10 ■costs and disbursements.  