
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh EPPS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-6904.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 2, 2015.
    Decided Nov. 4, 2015.
    Hugh Epps, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hugh Epps appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Epps, No. 3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. May 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  