
    ATTACHMENT.
    [Hamilton Circuit Court,
    January Term, 1898.]
    Cox, Swing and Smith, JJ.
    Charles J. Puerrung et al. v. Carter-Crume Co.
    Service on Foreign Corporations on Ground oe Non-Residence.
    Section 148c, Rev. Stat., providing that foreign corporations complying therewith shall not be subject to process of attachment oh the ground of non-residence, held to be constitutional and valid.
    Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton cpunty. ■
    The plaintiffs brought suit for $750 against the Carter-Crume Company, and garnished funds in the hands of Diem & Wing, the attachment being secured on the ground that the defendant company was a foreign corporation and a non-resident of the state. At the trial below Judge Sayler dissolved the attachment.
    
      C. W. Baker, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Kittredge & Wilby, contra.
    
   Smith, J.

We are of the opinion that the judgment in this case should be affirmed'; that sec. 148c, Rev. Stat., which in effect provides that in actions brought in this state against foreign corporations which have complied with the provisions of said statute they shall not be subject to process of attachment, under sec. 5521, Rev. Stat., or any law of Ohio, on the ground that it is a foreign corporation or a non-resident of the state, is a valid and constitutional law.

Cox and Swing, JJ., concur.  