
    Farrington and Smith against Sinclair.
    if the creditor in the prior execution levy Xbeionghig ind“ "permit wfth ihe'Teb" “5^ fo°hfe family, the execution and levy are, constructively, if not ^ actually, against a subsequent attachment or execution.
    IN this case, which was between the same parties, the facts . i .1 . ü were precisely the same as in the preceding case, except that the property levied upon was a barrel of pork, which Caswell consented should be left in Payne's possession, and used by his family, who consumed about one quarter of it, when it was levied upon by Smith, under an attachment at the suit of Farrington against Payne.
    
   Per Curiam.

I his is a strong case of constructive, if aot actual fraud, and the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.  