
    Daniel W. FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105723 (consolidated with ED 105726)
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: November 21, 2017
    Rehearing Denied January 3, 2018
    Daniel W. Foster, E.R.D.C.C., #530988, 2727 Highway K, Bonne Terre, MO. 63628, pro se.
    Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
    Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal. Daniel W. Foster (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment denying his motions to reopen two separate but related post-conviction proceedings, both stemming from his 1996 convictions. Movant argues the motion court erred in the 2017 judgment by denying his motions to vacate and set aside the 1996 and 1997 judgments in his post-conviction proceedings because the judgments were not final under Rule 74.01(b) in that 1996 and 1997 judgments failed to adjudicate all of the claims raised in Movant’s Rule 29.15 motions for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) (Mo. Sup. Ct. Rules 2017). 
      
      . All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (1996), the version of the Rules in effect at the time Movant was sentenced, unless otherwise indicated.
     