
    Andy Williams v. The State.
    No. 5547.
    Decided December 10, 1919.
    Manufacture of Intoxicating Liquors—Plea of Guilty.
    Where, upon trial of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquors, defendant contended in his motion for new trial that it was not shown that the liquor was intoxicating, but it appeared from the record on appeal that defendant had pleaded guilty, he could not complain; besides, the statement of facts showed that the. liquor was intoxicating.
    Appeal from the District Court of Smith. Tried below before the Hon. J. R. Warren, judge.
    Appeal from a conviction of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquors in this State; penalty, one year imprisonment in the penitentiary.
    The opinion states the ease.
    No brief on file for appellant.
    
      Alvin M. Owsley, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   LATTIMORE,

Judge.—Appellant pleaded guilty in the District Court of Smith County, of the offense of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and was given a penalty of one year in the penitentiary.

A motion for a new trial was filed upon the grounds that the liquor was not shown to be intoxicating, and that it was not shown that the same was not made for sacramental purposes, '•

A plea of guilty, under our practice, admits all the criminating facts alleged, and evidence is admitted only for the purpose of enabling the jury to determine the penalty. However, the evidence in the statement of facts in this case shows that the liquor was intoxicating. The charge of the court and the indictment appear to be in accordance with the law, and finding no error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. 1

Affirmed.  