
    Fidelity and Casualty Company v. Geiger et al.
    
    September 21, 1914.
    Claim. Before Judge Sheppard. Bryan superior court. J an- • uary 3, 1913.
    
      W. B. Stubbs, for plaintiff.
    
      W. F. Slater, J. F. Brannen, and Hines & Jordan, contra.
   Hill, J.

Several of the grounds of the motion for a new trial are too vague and indefinite to be considered by the court. The rule is that each ground of the motion must be complete in itself. Even if any of the other rulings and charge of the court complained of were erroneous, there is no error of sufficient materiality to require a new trial. The verdict is supported by the evidence.

Judgment Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.  