
    The Richmond & Danville Railroad Co. v. Bell.
    1. Touching the rule of the company which is involved in this case, the decision in Railroad. Co. v. Mitchell (this term) applies. Ante, 77.
    2. On its merits the case is a very weak one, and the trial court, in the exercise of the legal discretion which the law confides to it, might well have granted a new trial, but there was no manifest abuse of discretion, and this being so, the judgment must be and is
    May 22, 1893.
    Action for damages. Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. September term, 1892.
   Affirmed.

Jackson, Leetwich & JBlack, for plaintiff in error.

P. F. Smith and W. W. Gaines, contra.  