
    Hay v. Marsh et al.
    [No. 18,539.
    Filed Nov. 29, 1898.
    Rehearing denied June 28, 1899.]
    From the Clark Circuit Court.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      H. A. Burtt, J. E. Taggart, H. M. Dowling and Elliott & Elliott, for appellant.
    
      W. H. Watson, J. W. Fortune and L. A. Douglass, for appellees.
   Hackney, J.

This case, in its essential features, is like that of Hay v. Marsh, ante, 651. The evidence upon the question here presented is identical with that referred to in the case cited and authorizes the conclusion of fraud on the part of the appellant as the grantee of the property conveyed.

On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.  