
    Georgia R. R. & Bkg. Co. v. Fitzgerald, and vice versa.
    
    Argued July 28,—
    Decided August 8, 1900.
   Fish, J.

There being no exception to the rulings of the court during the progress of the trial, or to the charge, and there being sufficient evi- . dence to support the verdict, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment, on main bill of exceptions, affirmed; on cross-bill, dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Action for damages. Before Judge Russell. Walton superior court. August term, 1899.

Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming, for the railroad company.

LI. G. Roney and W. S. TJpshaw, contra.  