
    Chicago Lumber Company v. John S. Benjamin.
    Filed January 7, 1897.
    No. 6982.
    1. Review: Unautiienticated Bill of Exceptions. A bill of exceptions which is not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court is not entitled to consideration in this court.
    2. -: -. Where to an examination and settlement of questions argued to this court an inspection of the evidence contained in a bill of exceptions is necessary, and such bill lacks the authentication of the clerk of the trial court, the points presented may be overruled.
    Error from the district court of Custer county. Tried below before Holcomb, J.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      H. W. Dickinson, Dickinson & Shinn, and Wolfenbarger & Williams, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Campbell & Lidwich, contra.
    
   Harrison, J.

This case is presented to this court by petition in error to secure a review of the proceedings during its trial in the district court of Custer county, and the errors assigned and argued relate to the sufficiency of the evidence adduced to sustain the verdict rendered, and some other questions, all and singular of which require a reference to the evidence for their examination and settlement. There is attached'to the record what purports to be a bill of exceptions, but it is not authenticated as such instrument by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court. This being true, the evidence is not properly before ns for inspection, and as the points of complaint which are argued cannot be considered without it, they must be overruled. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.  