
    Avart v. Banks.
    There was judgment by default, and no attempt to show error on the appeal; the judgment was affirmed with damages, as a delay case. — S L. 101, and cases there noted.
    Appeal from the court of the second district, for the parish of Terrebonne, the judge of the fourth district presiding.
    This is an action on an overseer’s account for the balance due him on his wages. There was no defence, and judgment by default was made final on proof of the plaintiff’s demand. The defendant appealed.
    
      Beatty, for the plaintiff and appellee,
    prayed the affirKUVOTe of tixo judgment with damages. No eoim-Uaypearod fry tbs defendant.
   Morphy, J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment decreeing him to pay a certain amount of wages claimed by plaintiff as his overseer. He has suffered himself to be condemned by default in the court below, and has made no attempt in this court to show error in the judgment appealed from. The appellee has prayed for damages, and we think they should be awarded.

It is therefore ordered, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs and five per cent, damages.  