
    6116.
    Loftin v. The State.
    Decided April 13, 1915.
    Accusation of larceny from house; from city court of Carrollton —Judge Beall. November 7, 1914.
    
      Hood & Strickland, for plaintiff in error.
    
      G. E. Roop, solicitor, contra.
   Russell, C. J.

The Court of Appeals can not consider a bill of exceptions which contains merely a recital of the history of the ease and specifies the parts of the record to be transmitted, but which does not set forth any complaint as to any ruling of the lower court or assign error thereon. Under such circumstances the judgment must be presumed to have been correct. Judgment affirmed.  