
    14341.
    Allen v. This State.
   Beoyi.es, C. J.

While the preponderance of the evidence was in the defendant’s favor, it cannot be held that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere with it.

Decided May 16, 1923.

Accusation of possessing liquor; from city court of Dublin — Judge Sturgis. January 27, 1923.

T. P. Stephens, for plaintiff in error.

William Brunson, solicitor, contra. ■

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  