
    HOWE v. HALL.
    No. 10826 —
    Opinion Filed Sept. 30, 1919.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    1. Appeal and Erroiv-Record Proper— Agreed Facts.
    An agreed statement of facts, not being a part of the record, unless made so by hill of ■exceptions or case-made, cannot be considered on error, although a copy of it is attached to the transcript of the record.
    
      2. Same.
    The “record” proper in a civil action does not include an agreed statement of facts.
    Error from District Court, McIntosh County ; H. L. Melton, Judge.
    R. D. Howe, for plaintiff in error.
    Jno. W. Porter, for defendant in error.
    Action by Lena Tiger Hall against Mrs. R. D. I-Iowe to cancel deed and remove cloud from title. From the judgment, Mrs. R. D. Howe brings error by transcript.
    Dismissed.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by transcript, without bill of exceptions or case-made. A motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by defendant in error. The ease was tried on an agreed statements of facts, and judgment rendered for plaintiff canceling a deed under which the defendant claimed title to the land in controversy. The assignments of error require a consideration of the agreed statement of facts on which the case was tried. It was held in the ease of Brown v. Capital Townsite Co., 21 Okla. 586, 96 Pac. 587, that an agreed statement of facts, not being a part of the record, unless made so by bill of exceptions or case-made, cannot be considered on error, although a copy of it is attached to the transcript of the record.

The “record” proper in a civil action does not include an agreed statement of facts. So. Surety Co. v. Turnham, 58 Okla. 583, 160 Pac. 468; Williams v. Kelly, 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 204; Callahan v. Callahan, 47 Okla. 542, 149 Pac. 135.

Therefore the motion to dismiss must be sustained, and it is so ordered.  