
    Graham & Boyle v. Underwood.—Paul Juge & Co., Intervenors.
    Tko right of the master of a vessel to sell the cargo, in case of necessity, for the benefit of all concerned, recognized in certain cases by the commercial law, for the benefit of navigation, is an exception to the general rule contained in Article 2427 of oar Code, and must bo strictly construed.
    Where a cargo is sold without such a necessity as will justify the sale, it is an act of barratry on the part of the captain, and confers no title upon the purchaser.
    APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish 'of Jefferson, Burthe, J.
    
      Bonford, Singleton <& Clack, for plaintiffs.
    
      Durant & Hornor, for defendant and appellant.
    
      Michel <& Koontz, for intervenors.
   Buchanan, J.

A flatboat loaded with staves consigned to plaintiffs, got aground upon -a bar in the Mississippi. She was unloaded, and her cargo piled up on the bar ; in which condition it was sold by the master of the flatboat to defendant.

The law as to the right of the master to sell the cargo, in case of necessity, for the benefit of all concerned, is laid down in 19 La., pp. 42, 49 and 54.

This right, recognized in certain cases by the commercial law, for the benefit of navigation, is an exception to the general rule contained in Article 2427 of our Code, and must be very strictly construed.

The circumstances of the present case do not disclose that urgent necessity which alone would have authorized the sale of this flatboat and her cargo of staves, under the authorities; but the contrary. The sacrifice of this property, for one-fourth of its value, was an act of barratry on the part of the master of the flatboat which conferred no title upon the purchaser.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Land, J., absent.  