
    Seward v. The State.
    Submitted March 20,
    — Decided March 24, 1905.
    Petition for certiorari. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior court. January 20, 1905.
    
      O. O. Hall, for plaintiff in error. .
    
      W. E. Thomas, solicitor-general, contra.
   Candle», J.

The petition for certiorari complained that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, and that the court erred in refusing to grant a continuance. The evidence set out in the petition showed that the conviction of the accused was not unwarranted; and it did not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to continue the case. It was therefore not error to refuse to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.  