
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco Javier CANASTILLO-ARGUELLES, aka Francisco Canastillo-Arguelles, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-10675.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00582-JMR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 14, 2003.
    
    Decided Oct. 23, 2003.
    Before WARDLAW, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Francisco Javier Canastillo-Arguelles appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for one count of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with an enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Canastillo-Arguelles’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record on the ground that he failed to discover any arguable issues on appeal. Canastillo-Arguelles has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     