
    BROWN v. STATE.
    (No. 5350.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    May 7, 1919.)
    1. Criminal Daw <¾=^1097(4) — Absence oe Statement of Facts.
    In absence of statement of facts, it cannot be determined whether bill of exceptions relating to exclusion of evidence is meritorious or not.
    2. Criminal Law <S=^1144(13) — Absence, of Statement of Facts — Presumptions.
    The evidence not having .been brought up for review by statement of facts, the presumption is that it supports the verdict.
    Appeal from District Court, Gregg County ; Daniel Walker, Judge.
    Crouse Brown was convicted of burglary, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    E. A. Berry, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, J.

The appeal is from a conviction for burglary.

We find no statement of facts, in the absence of which we are not in position to determine whether the bill of exceptions relating to the exclusion of evidence is meritorious or not. The evidence not having been 'brought up for review, the presumption is indulged that it supports the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed. 
      <gzs?For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     