
    
      Battle vs. the executors of Yates.
    
    *pKIS was a petition brought by one of the next bin of the •A testator, claiming a proportion of a surplus not bequeathed by the will ot the testator. It was argued between the counsel-that the eau'fe should he submitted to the court upon the following statement. Th.it the testator amongst other bequests, made the following; After tr.y debts are paid, it is my will and de« “ s;rt- that my stock of hogs and cattle, my notes and accounts, 11 shall go in Us- Willie ms.” That the executor paid the debts of the elvSti- mst of the undisnoied surplus j and that if this ap-ípKcníion oí ¿13 cúrala:, b* tie evscuior wi proprr j and i« h« i»'»» boí be usó fo i’-'.y &<•• ¿etw nss of tile kg*cy br<joeA<htd í¿ XJs. Wii>.4<»s, »\ut ch»si üí-- í'í'thuíí» shoutd.he disnsissíji,™níL' ?■= wCe there wfe» to be judgment so? the petitioner, A"ter eygu-s:. ear.
   Lock, Ju.Íí]1;,

dechtvj bis ochúon that che app'kaíioa oííh; by the eseciuor, wtn ¡r/opc*-,,

AuJ Ule petition was ¿ksr.ssed»  