
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Muangu GHOTA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6490
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 21, 2016
    Decided: June 23, 2016
    Muangu Ghota, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Muangu Ghota appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.' § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ghota, No. 3:13-cr-00105-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  