
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ricardo BAUTISTA-RAMOS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-30317.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00032-DWM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 7, 2003.
    
    Decided April 16, 2003.
    Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ricardo Bautista-Ramos appeals the seventy-seven month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry by a previously deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Bautista-Ramos contends he is entitled to a “horizontal” departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 because his criminal history category overstated the seriousness of his criminal conduct and the district court failed to consider mitigating facts underlying his prior convictions.

A district court’s discretionary refusal to depart from a prescribed sentencing guideline range is unreviewable on appeal unless the district court rested its decision on an erroneous belief that it lacked the authority to depart. United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1064 (9th Cir.2000). Because the district court recognized its authority to depart, we lack jurisdiction to review Bautista-Ramos’s sentence. See id.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     