
    CHARLESTON.
    State v. Martha Pawlak
    (No. 5847)
    Submitted April 27, 1927.
    Decided May 3, 1927.
    Intoxicating Liquors — Indictment For Transporting Intoxicating Liquor, Not Negativing Exceptions in Statute, Held Demur-rable (Code, 1923, c. 32A, § 31a).
    
    Syllabus in State v. Taylor, 95 W. Va. 518, applied.
    (Indictment and Information, 31 C. J. § 269 : Intoxicating Liquors, 33 C. J. § 147.)
    (Noma: Parenthetical references by Editors, C. J. — Cye. Not part of syllabi.)
    Error to Circuit Court, Marshall County.
    Martha Pawlak was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquors, and she brings error.
    
      Demurrer sustained; case remanded.
    
    
      A. L. Hooton and Martin Broiun, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Howard B. Lee, Attorney General and J. Luther Wolfe, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   Hatcher, President:

In this case the defendant has been convicted and sentenced under an indictment which charges that ‘ ‘ on.day of December, 1925, the said Martha Pawlak, in the said county of Marshall did unlawfully and feloniously transport from one place to another in said county and state intoxicating liquors against the peace and dignity of the State.”

Transportation of intoxicating liquor from one place to another within the state, except under certain circumstances is made an offense by Sec. 31a, Ch. 115, Acts of 1921, which appears in the Code of 1923 as Sec. 31a, Ch. 32A. That section is in part as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person to order, purchase, sell, or cause intoxicating liquors, to be transported into the state, or from one place to another within the state, in any manner, except pure grain alcohol, for medicinal, pharmaceutical, scientific and mechanical purposes, and wine for sacramental purposes to be used by religions bodies,' as now provided by law. ’ ’

It being no crime to transport liquor under tbe conditions excepted by tlie statute, it bas been held by this court that an indictment for transportation which does not negative the exceptions is vulnerable on demurrer. “An indictment under Section 31a of Chapter 115, Acts 1921, Section 31a of Chapter 32A, Barnes’ Code 1923, which fails to negative the exceptions contained therein, is bad on demurrer and motion to quash.” State v. Taylor, 95 W. Va. 518.

The demurrer to the indictment will therefore be sustained, and the case remanded.

Demurrer sustained; case remanded.  