
    Baldwin et al., Appellees, v. Lint et al., Appellants.
    (No. 26089
    Decided October 14, 1936.)
    
      Mr. Edward Lamb, for appellees.
    Messrs'. Smith, Baker, Effler & Eastman, Messrs. Welles, Kelsey & Cobourn, Messrs. Marshall, Melhorn d Marlar and Messrs. Doyle & Lewis, for appellants.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.  