
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Irving Calvin VENEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-6892.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.
    Decided: Sept. 27, 2013.
    Irving Calvin Veney, Appellant pro se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Irving Calvin Veney appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Veney, 3:09-cr-00107-JRS-2 (E.D.Va. May 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  