
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronell McKinley PRESSEY, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 11-7709.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 26, 2012.
    Decided: April 30, 2012.
    Ronell McKinley Pressey, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Ronell McKinley Pressey appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pressey, No. 4:01-cr-00083-RBS-3 (E.D. Va. Nov. 8, 2011 & Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  