
    SULZBACKER v. J. CAWTHRA & CO., Limited.
    (Common Pleas of New York City And County, General Term.
    December 2, 1895.)
    Actioii by Joseph H. Sulzbacker against J. ■Cawthra & Co., Limited.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s motion to reduce the amount for which the attachment was granted is not inconsistent with its appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the attachment Both motions were availed of by the defendant as of right Hence this motion for dismissal of the appeal should be denied, with $10 costs.  