
    Moen, Respondent, vs. Madison Railways Company, Appellant.
    
      May 1
    
    June 4, 1929.
    
    For the appellant there was a brief by Schubring, Ryan, Clarke & Petersen of Madison, and oral argument by William Ryan.
    
    For the respondent there was a brief by Hill, Thomanm, & Beckwith, and oral argument by John T. Harrington, all of Madison.
   Per Curiam.

This case is ruled by the case of Moen v. Madison Railways Co., decided herewith (ante, p. 168, 225 N. W. 822). Order reversed, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. No costs, except clerk’s fees, to be taxed against respondent.  