
    No. P66/63.
    protests 64/9661, etc. (New York).
    Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Markand Thakar et al. v. United States,
   Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of parts essential to and dedicated to use with bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (48 Cust Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.  