
    JESSIE WRIGHTSMAN HOVERSTOCK v. JOHN C. ROGERS et al., Appellants.
    Division Two,
    February 6, 1912.
    The facts in this case are the same as those in the case of Wrights-man v. Rogers, ante, p. 417, and this case is decided upon tn« authority of that.
    Appeal from Christian Circuit Court. — Ron. Argun Cox, Judge.
    Reversed and remanded (with directions).
    
      G. A. Watson for appellants.
    
      Addison Brown for respondent.
   ROT, C.

— The facts in this case are in all respects the same as in the case of Ora "Wrightsman v. John 0. Rogers, the same defendant (ante, p. 417).

Our opinion in this case is the same as in than

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to proceed with the cause in accord-' anee with the opinion in that case.

Bond, G. (sitting in Division Two when this case was argned), concurs.

PER CURIAM.

— The foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All the judges concur.  