
    Jose Rodrigo Leon GARCIA; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 07-74864.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Oct. 6, 2008.
    
    Filed Oct. 15, 2008.
    Hugo F. Larios, Esq., Tempe, AZ, for Petitioners.
    Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, OIL, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

This is a petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing an appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of removal.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The sole issue on appeal has been foreclosed by our decision in Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 649 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     