
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abdul RAZAQ NAEEM, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 99-50441.
    D.C. No. CR-97-00015-RT.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 2, 2002.
    
    Decided Dec. 11, 2002.
    Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Abdul Razaq Naeem appeals his conviction and 60-month sentence imposed after his jury trial for arson, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 8440).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Naeem has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Naeem has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising two issues.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     