
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margaret Lou MORSETTE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-30159.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 18, 2008.
    
    Filed July 9, 2008.
    Joseph E. Thaggard, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Chad Wright, Esq., Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Margaret Lou Morsette appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Morsette contends that her sentence is unreasonable because the district court focused most of its 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) analysis on the nature and circumstances of the offense rather than on her personal characteristics. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err and that the 108-month sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United, States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596-98,169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     