
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Juvencio ACOSTA-GARCIA, aka Juan Juvencio Acosta, Juan Garcia Acosta, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-10476. D.C. No. CR-02-00482-FJM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 21, 2003.
    
    Decided July 24, 2003.
    Before LEAVY, HAWKINS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Juan Juvencio Acosta-Garcia appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Acosta-Garcia has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Acosta-Garcia has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising two issues.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues requiring further review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     