
    2242.
    Miller v. Morotock Manufacturing Co.
    Complaint; from city court of Cordele — Judge Strozier. September 23, 1909.
    Submitted December 21,
    Decided December 24, 1909.
    
      J. T. Hill, for defendant in error.
   Powell, J.

On tlie call of the case the plaintiff in error failed to prosecute the writ of error. The defendant in error moved to open the record, and insisted on an affirmance of the judgment and an award of ten per cent, damages for delay, under Rule 22 of this court. The motion of the defendant in error is granted and the judgment is affirmed, with damages. Judgment affirmed with damages.  