
    TAYLOR v. GODWARD.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    October 5, 1898.)
    Appeal—Sufficiency of Evidence.
    The action oí the trial justice in rendering a judgment on conflicting testimony will not be reviewed, where no peculiar circumstances exist.
    Appeal from Eighth district court.
    Action by Marie Taylor against William H. G-odward. From an order dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Argued before BEEKMA2ST, P. J., and GILDEESLEEVE and GIEGEEIGH, JJ.
    James F. Milliken, for appellant.
    G. A. C. Barnett, for respondent.
   PEE GTJEIAM.

The sole question involved in 'this appeal is one of fact. The facts testified to by witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff were denied by the defendant, which raised an issue that it was the province of the justice to decide. It was for him to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses. He has seen fit to credit the evidence given on behalf of the defendant; and as this court has repeatedly held that it will not review the action of the trial justice in that regard, except under peculiar circumstances that do not exist here, the judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.  