
    COLE v. STATE.
    (No. 4456.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 25, 1917.)
    Unlawful Assembly &wkey;>2 — Inofobmation.
    The information must allege the persons met “with intent to aid each other by violence,” etc., to bring it within the definition in Pen. Code 1911, art. 435, of unlawful assembly.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Unlawful Assembly, Cent. Dig. § 3.]
    Appeal from El Paso County Court; Adrian Pool, Judge.
    J. W. Cole was convicted, and appeals.
    Reversed and remanded.
    M. W. Stanton and Hudspeth & Dale, all of El Paso, for appellant. E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of “unlawful assembly” with a fine of $250 assessed. The statutes prescribing this offense as applicable herein are:

Article 435, P. C.:

“An ‘unlawful. assembly’ is the meeting of three or more persons with intent to aid each other by violence, or in any other manner ⅛ ther to commit an offense, or illegally to deprive any person of any right, or to disturb him in the enjoyment thereof.”

And article 445, P. C.:

“If the purpose of the unlawful assembly he to prevent any person from pursuing any labor, occupation or employment, or to intimidate any person from following his daily avocation, or to interfere in any manner with the labor or employment of another, the punishment shall be by fine not exceeding five hundred dollars.”

The information, which is based upon a complaint to the same effect, after the proper and necessary preliminary allegations, was in two counts. The second, under which this conviction was had, is:

“That said 3. W. Cole did then and there unlawfully assemble and meet together with B. L. Ligón, P. T. Carmody, C. C. Smith, Sam Collins, A. J. Reynolds, H. Canfield, and three and more persons whose names to the assistant county attorney are unknown with the intent and purpose to illegally prevent Albert Kuehme and-Brown from pursuing and to deprive him and them from the enjoyment of his and their rights to pursue the labors, occupations, and employment of operativos of the street cars of the El Paso Electric Railway Company, a corporation, they then and there being engaged and employed by said El Paso Electric Railway Company as motorman and street car conductor on said car, and to intimidate said Kuehme and Brown from following and pursuing his and their said daily vocations, the same being the usual and ordinary occupations of Kuehme and Brown, and to interfere with the labor and employment of said Kuehme and Brown as street car motorman and conductor, as aforesaid, against the peace and dignity of the state.”

Appellant attacked this count of the information and moved to quash it on the ground that it failed to allege, in accordance with said article 435, that appellant, with the other persons named therein, unlawfully assembled “with intent to aid each other by violence,” etc., for the purpose of preventing said street car employés named from pursuing their labor, etc. This allegation was necessary to a valid complaint and information against appellant. The allegations made do not meet this requisite. The court therefore erred in not quashing this count of the information and in not granting a new trial [when conviction was had thereunder.

Bor this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. 
      (gzs>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numhered Digests and Indexes
     