
    No. 9989.
    Dorman v. The State.
    From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
    
      J. V. Hadley, E. G. Hogate and R. B. Blake, for appellant.
    
      D. P. Baldwin, Attorney General, N. M. Taylor, Prosecuting Attorney, .and W. W Thornton, for the State.
   Per Curiam.

— The appellant was convicted and adjudged to pay a fine for an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors, and the question is whether the evidence supports the charge. No useful purpose would be subserved by giving the evidence or a synopsis of it. Our conclusion is that the evidence does not sustain the charge.

Judgment reversed.  