
    No. 3001.
    Floyd et al. v. Rike et al.
    (Decided June 27, 1895.)
    Error to the Circuit Court of Montgomery county.
    
      William Lawrence, George W. Llouk and Young <& Young, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Gunchel <& Rowe and McMahon c& McMahon, for defendants in error.
   The case has been fully and exhaustively considered in the opinion of the circuit court as announced by Shearer, J. Rike et al. v. Floyd et al., 6 O. C. C. Rep., 80. We fully affirm the reasoning of the court, and the conclusions there rendered.

Judgment affirmed.

Shatick, J., did not sit in the case.  