
    Duncan et al. v. Hopkins.
    Submitted May 6, —
    Decided June 1, 1903.
    Case. Before Judge Russell. Gwinnett superior court. September 2, 1902.
    
      Julian & McDonald, for plaintiffs.
    
      T. M. Peeples apd J. B. Irwin, for defendant.
   Candler, J.

The charge complained of announces a principle of law which is correct in the abstract; and as no specific vice in it is pointed out in the motion, it will not be cause for a new trial. The court did not err in overruling the motion on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.  