
    19928.
    Maulding v. The State.
    Decided November 12, 1929.
    
      J. R. Hutcheson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      S. W. Ragsdale, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in either of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, there is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and no error was committed when the motion for a new trial was overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.  