
    NEW YORK SUPERIOR COURT
    GENERAL TERM,
    FEBRUARY, 1893.
    Peaslee v. Peaslee.
    Appeal from an order of the Special Term, striking out part of answer.
    
      Daniel G. Rollins, for plaintiff (respondent).
    
      Arnoux, Ritch <& Woodford (William B. Arnoux, of counsel), for defendants (appellants).
   Per Ouriam.

The law, as declared on the former motion to strike out the paragraph similar to the one in question here, contained in the answer to the original complaint in this action, is final and conclusive between the parties hereto. The order made on that motion has not been appealed from, and stands unmodified and unrevoked. This application presents no grounds or question that did not exist at the time of the former application, and that was not then as fully within the defendants’ knowledge as now. The motion herein was properly granted.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with ten dollars -costs and disbursements.

Order affirmed.  