
    13085
    SHAW v. FAIREY ET AL.
    
    (158 S. E., 159)
    July, 1930.
    
      Messrs. H. E. Davis, Lee & Shuler, Hinds & Meadors, ■F. R. Hemingway and /. M. McIntosh, for appellants,
    
      Messrs. Logan & Grace and Ino. I. Cosgrove, for respondent,
    April 1, 1931.
   The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff, a depositor of the Bank of Kingstree, for himself and all other depositors, in November, 1929, in the Court of Common Pleas for Williamsburg County, against the stockholders of said bank, to recover for the depositors the statutory liability of the stockholders. The bank closed its doors and ceased to do business in June, 1925. The action is in the nature of a creditor’s bill in equity. The defendant stockholders demurred to the complaint upon the ground that the Act of 1929, 36 Stat., 199, vested the exclusive right to institute such an action in the receiver of the bank, it appearing upon the face of the complaint that a receiver had been appointed. The demurrer was heard by his Honor, Judge Dennis, who overruled it.

The case of Branchville Motor Co. v. Adden, 158 S. C., 90, 155 S. E., 277, is conclusive of the issue; the demurrer should have been sustained.

The judgment of this Court is that the order of his Honor, Judge Dennis, be reversed, and that the case be remanded to the Circuit Court, with leave to the plaintiff to apply to the Circuit Court for an order amending their complaint substituting the. receiver in the place of the present plaintiff, or, if he may be so advised, for leave to file a supplemental complaint conforming as near as may be with the opinion of the Court filed in the case of Fischer v. Chisolm, 159 S. C., 395, 157 S. E., 139, filed March 6, 1931.

Mr. Chief Justice Brease and Messrs. Justices StabrEr and Carter concur.  