
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Antonio Garcia-Rodriguez, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-30260.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 9, 2007 .
    Filed July 16, 2007.
    Rafael M. Gonzalez, Jr., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Thomas M. Monaghan, Esq., Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Antonio Cuevas-Rodriguez appeals from his 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Assuming arguendo that Cuevas-Rodriguez’s appeal waiver was invalidated by the district court’s oral pronouncements, we conclude that the district court properly considered the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors in imposing the sentence. See United States v. Ploujfe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     