
    Owen McFarland vs. The Orange and Newark Horse Car Railroad Company.
    The charier of the defendants contained the following clause: “the president and directors of said company bo and they are hereby authorized and invested with all the rights and powers necessary and expedient to survey, lay out, and construct a railroad from some suitable point in the township of Orange, in the county of Essex, to some suitable point in Orange street, or some street north of said street, or south of Market street, in the city of Newark.”
    
      Held, that this enactment relates not to the route, but to the termination of the road, and that thereby the road of tiro company was not excluded from being located in or through Market street.
    
      This- was a motion to. dissolve an injunction.
    
      Oliver S. Malsted, sen.? foi? complainant..
    
      Abraham O. Zabrislde% for defendant's.
   The Chancello».

The whole equity of the complainant’s bill rests upon the ground that there was no authority for the location of the railroad in or through Market street, in the- city of Newark. If the company were authorized by their charter to locate and construct their road through that street — if its construction then was authorized by law, it could be no nuisance, nor was the injury it occasioned to the complainant of a character which entitled him to relief by Injunction.

The injunction was originally granted on the assumption that the charter of the company, by necessary implication if not in express terms, excluded the road from being located in or through Market street. Upon a careful examination of the- charter; I am satisfied that there is no ground for- that opinion. The language of the act (§ 7) is as follows: “ the president and directors of the said company be and they are hereby authorized and invested with all the rights and powers necessary and expedient to survey, lay out, and construct a railroad from some suitable point in the township of Orange, in the county of Essex, to some suitable point In Orange street, or some street north of said street, or south of Market street, in the city of Newark.” This enactment relates not to the route, but to the termination of the road. Its design was no.t to exclude the line of the road, but its terminus, from the district included between Market and Orange streets. Whether the language of the act be construed to fix the terminus at a point south of Market street, or at some point in a street south of Market, is immaterial. In either event the statute is complied with. It appears, by the answer, that although the line of the road is through Market street, its terminus is a point and in a street south of Market street.

There is authority, both from the legislature and from the corporate authorities-, of Kewark, to construct the-road in its present location.

The injunction must be dissolved with costs.  