
    13916.
    Garren v. The State.
    Decided November 17, 1922.
    Accusation of possession of liquor; from city court of Tifton — Judge Price. August 10, 1922.
    
      Ridgdill & Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.
    
      R. E. Dinsmore, solicitor, contra.
   Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds; the evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt; and the finding of the jury was approved by the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  