
    MURRAY vs. HAMILTON.
    
      April 16th.
    
    An attachment founded onlM-^found," cannot be levied on land-
    
      \ Brad. 2*3.
    HAMILTON issued his capias against Murray, and on a return “ a copy left,” took out an attachment, which was levied on a lot in South Frankfort ; on that return Hamilton proceeded and obtained judgment in the court below.
   By this Court

The law regulating the proceedings on attachment, does not authorise the levying the attachment awarded in this case on land.

Judgment reversed. 
      
       A fimil-ir decifion was given, fpring term, 1808, in the cafe of Anderfon vs. Morton, and Co.
      
     