
    Pool v. Pool.
    
      March 15. 1834.
    to cuita for separation, where the complainant provea hii or her case, the form of the decretal order settled by chancellor Kent is to be used.
   A suit for limited divorce; the case was proved; and the solicitor for the complainant brought the draft of the proposed decree for the approval of the vice-chancellor: when His Honor required it should be made conformable to the decretal order which appears in the printed report of Barrere v. Barrere, 4. J. C. R. 187. and suggested its being a desirable form to be used in all similar cases.  