
    The State, ex rel. Myers, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio.
    (No. 27305
    Decided April 26, 1939.)
    
      Messrs, Dolle, O’Donnell & Gash, for relator.
    
      Mr. Herbert 8. Duffy and Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, attorneys general, Mr. Eugene Carlin, Mr. G. L. Hawthorne and Mr. E. P. FelJcer, for respondent.
   By the Court.

The only question involved in this proceeding is thus stated in the brief of counsel for relator: “The controversy is simply whether or not Section 1465-90, Grenoral Code, whioh became effective July 3, 1937, applies. If it does, then this writ, admittedly, should be granted. The argument of respondent against its applicability rests solely on the effect of Section 26, General Code, with respect thereto.”

That question was answered by this court in State, ex rel. Longano, v. Industrial Commission, ante, 165, and a writ will, therefore, he denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.  