
    Sethman et al. v. O’Neal et al.
    
      Supreme Court. — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 20224
    Decided February 23, 1927.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Ottawa county.
    
      Messrs. Bayly, Lawrence S Beach, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Messrs. True, Crawford & ■ True and Messrs. Gates, Chenowith & Blair, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Day, Allen, Kinkade, Jones and Matthias, JJ.. concur.  