
    Before the First Division,
    February 17, 1969
    No. P69/40.
    protests 66/15758-15082, etc. (Chicago).
    Dowst Manufacturing Company v. United States,
   Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gamble Vargish & Co., dba Seabury & Co. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.  