
    Ex parte Cornelius RICHARDSON (Re Cornelius Richardson v. State of Alabama).
    86-700.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    May 29, 1987.
    Arthur J. Madden, III, Mobile, for petitioner.
    Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Our denial of the writ should not be taken as approval of the statements of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 508 So.2d 289, relating to the fact that the jury was allowed during its deliberations to consider transcribed testimony of certain witnesses.

WRIT DENIED.

JONES, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.  