
    Case No. 3,533.
    DADE v. MANDEVILLE.
    [1 Cranch, C. C. 92.] 
    
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    April Term, 1802.
    Judgment against Co-Subett—Jubisdiction.
    The summary remedy given in Virginia by a motion against a co-surety is confined to the court which rendered the original judgment .
    Motion by Dade for judgment against Mandeville, as joint surety with Dade for Brown & Co. Judgment had been rendered against Dade in the Fairfax county court
    Mr. Simms, for defendant,
    contended that the summary remedy by one surety against another, was confined to the court who gave the original judgment Rev. Code, 292, 337.
   THE COURT

so decided.  