
    Barnett v. Spencer.
    September Term, 1807.
    Injunction — Motion to Dissolve — Costs.—Costs should not be taxed upon, overruling- or sustaining a motion to dissolve an injunction.
    Upon an appeal from- an order of the county court of Pittsylvania, dissolving the injunction of the appellant, with costs.
   PER CURIAM.

This is not like the case of Davenport v. Mason, 2 Wash. 200. The decree in that case was made in the regular course of the docket, upon the final hearing of the cause; but, in this case, it was only a motion to dissolve; and costs were improperly decreed. So much of the decree, therefore, as relates to the costs, must be reversed with costs, and the cause remitted to the county court, to be proceeded in to a final decree.  