
    Adam Z. Rice, Appellant, v Penguin Putnam, Inc., Respondent.
    Submitted February 11, 2002;
    decided April 30, 2002
   Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s cross motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.  