
    SESSUMS v. STATE.
    (No. 6105.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 23, 1921.)
    Criminal law <@=>1090(8) — In absence of statement, evidence presumed to support verdict.
    Where there is no statement of facts or bills of exceptions in the record, the evidence will be presumed to have been sufficient to authorize the verdict of conviction.
    Appeal from' Criminal District Court, Harris County; G. W. Robinson, Judge.
    Dave Sessums was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    O. M. Cureton, Atty. Gen., and E. F. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

The appellant was indicted in Harris county, Tex., for the offense of burglary, and upon conviction his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us with no statement of facts or bills of exception. No fundamental error or irregularity is disclosed in any of the proceedings upon the trial, and the evidence will be presumed to have been sufficient to authorize the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.  