
    Dade County Croppers, Inc., v. H. S. Wood.
    173 So. 345.
    Opinion Filed March 22, 1937.
    
      Pierce & Enwall, for Appellant;
    
      Joseph Weintraub, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This case having come on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the written briefs and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the-sáme having been duly considered, it appears that the decision of this case depends upon whether or not the chancellor was correct in' his conclusions' upon the testimony and evidence in the case, and that inasmuch as such conclusions do not appear to be clearly erroneous, the decree appealed from should be affirmed in accordance with the general rule that the appellate court will not overturn the conclusion reached by the chancellor from the testimony and evidence in the case unless it appears that such conclusion was clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.  