
    Gregory STESHENKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas McKAY, of the Cabrillo Community College; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-17095.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 13, 2014.
    
    Decided Jan. 17, 2014.
    Gregory Steshenko, Aptos, CA, pro se.
    Eric Kai-Him Shiu, John A. Shupe, Esquire, Lynch and Shupe, LLP, Burlin-game, CA, Carolyn Katzorke, Dummit, Buchholz & Trapp, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: TROTT, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff Gregory Steshenko appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

The sole issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     