
    Fatemeh NAJAFIAN, Debtor-Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE N.A., Successor and Assign to Chevy Chase Bank FSB Loan Servicer c/o Samuel I. White PC, Creditor-Appellee, Kevin R. McCarthy, Trustee; Office of the United States Trustee, Trustees-Appellees. Fatemeh Najafian, Debtor-Appellant, v. Capital One N.A., Successor and Assign to Chevy Chase Bank FSB Loan Servicer c/o Samuel I. White PC, Creditor-Appellee, Kevin R. McCarthy, Trustee; Office of the United States Trustee, Trustees-Appellees. Fatemeh Najafian, Debtor-Appellant, v. Capital One N.A., Successor and Assign to Chevy Chase Bank FSB Loan Servicer c/o Samuel I. White PC, Creditor-Appellee, Kevin R. McCarthy, Trustee; Office of the United States Trustee, Trustees-Appellees.
    Nos. 10-2206, 10-2322, 10-2360.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 28, 2011.
    Decided: May 2, 2011.
    Fatemeh Najafian, pro se. Ronald James Guillot, Jr., Samuel I. White, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; Kevin R. McCarthy, McCarthy & White, P.L.L.C., McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Fatemeh Najafian appeals the district court’s orders: (1) denying her motions to renew the automatic stay and prevent foreclosure; (2) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Capital One N.A.’s motion for relief from the automatic stay; and (3) dismissing her motion to appeal an order of the bankruptcy court denying her motion to dismiss the Interim Trustee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Najafian v. Capital One N.A., Nos. 1:10-cv-00664-GBL-IDD; 1-10-cv-00843GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2010; filed Nov. 15, 2010 & entered Nov. 16, 2010; filed Nov. 22, 2010 & entered Nov. 23, 2010). We deny Najafian’s motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  