
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis REYNA-ROBLES, a.k.a. Jose Reyna-Robles, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-10093.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 15, 2011.
    
    Filed June 24, 2011.
    David R. Zipps, USTU-Office of The U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    David Lipartito, Law Office of David Lipartito, Tuscon, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Luis Reyna-Robles appeals from the sentence of 13 months and one day imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Reyna-Robles contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because he should have been granted a departure or variance based on cultural assimilation. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, Reyna-Robles’s sentence within the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     