
    No. 3523.
    Hunter, Treas., et al. v. Earl et al.
    (Decided January 30, 1894.)
    Error to the Circuit Court of Lucas county.
    
      
      W. II A. JRecid, City Solicitor, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Brown <& Geddes, for defendants in error.
   Judgment affirmed on the ground that the ordinance of July 18, 1889, did not indicate an intention on the part of the city to assess on the abutting’ property, any part of the costs included in the assessment ordinance of October 27, 1890; nor was any opportunity given the parties assessed to be heard on or in opposition to the same.  