
    25439.
    Knopp v. The State.
    Decided February 6, 1936.
    
      Willis Smith, Earl Staples for plaintiff in error.
    
      Emmett Smith, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky, and his motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the verdict; and the finding of the jury having been approved by the judge, and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.  