
    BARTHEL v. CRIPPEN.
    Appeal and Error — Motion to Remand — Decision—Postponement.
    The decision of a motion to remand a chancery case to the circuit court for the introduction of testimony discovered since the appeal was perfected is reserved till the hearing of the appeal.
    Bill by Otto F. Barthel against George F. Crippen and Lewis Crippen for the specific performance of a contract. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal: On motion to remand the record for a rehearing.
    Submitted October 6, 1908.
    (Calendar No. 22,361.)
    Motion denied November 2, 1908.
    
      Lee N. Brown, for the motion.
    
      Henry O. L. Forler, contra.
   Per Curiam.

This is a motion on behalf of defendants and appellants for the remanding of the record in the above-entitled cause to the circuit court for the county of Wayne, in chancery, for the introduction of further testimony on the part of defendants, alleged to be material and necessary to a just determination of the issues involved and to have been discovered since the appeal to this court was perfected.

In accordance with the practice approved by this court in Adams v. Field, 25 Mich. 16, the question of a rehearing will be reserved till the hearing of the appeal.  