
    Espel v. Cincinnati Walnut Theatre Amusement Co.
    
      Supreme Court — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 19321
    Decided December 15, 1925.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
    
      Mr. Joseph B. Kelley, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. DeCamp, Sutphin & Brumleve, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Bobinson, JJ., concur.  