
    QUINTANA v. STATE.
    (No. 9194.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 10, 1925.)
    Criminal law <©=>1144(14) — Requested special charge assumed properly refused, where record contains no- statement of facts.
    A requested special charge must be assumed to have been properly refused, where record contains no statement of facts nor bill of exceptions.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Cameron County; A. W. Cunningham, Judge.
    Raldomero Quintana was convicted for felony theft, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Aug. Celaya, of .Brownsville, for appellant.
    Tom Garrard, State’s Atty., and Grover C. , Morris, Asst. State’s Atty., both of Austin,, for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for felony-theft ; ' punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of' facts nor bills of exception. A special charge was requested and exception reserved to its refusal, but we have no way of appraising-the applicability of the special charge. In the absence of the facts, it must be assumed-that the court was correct in refusing the-charge.

The judgment in affirmed.  