
    THOMPSON Exr. v. GUSLER et
    Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Paulding Co
    No 53.
    Decided July 9, 1929
    Walters & Hanlin, Van Wert, for Thompson.
    F. P. Spriggs, Paulding, for Gusler.
   HUGHES, J.

Under and by virtue of Article 4, Section 7 of the Constitution, when a majority vote of the people has been taken, these t"*o courts, to wit,' the probate court and the court of common pleas, shall be combined and shall be known as the court of common pleas. After this vote has been taken, there is but one court, the court of common pleas, and there can be no "’^h thing as an appeal taken from a judgment entered in one division of that court, to the court itself. There is no longer a probate court in Paulding county. It is a court of common pleas, with the same jurisdiction that the probate court of that countv formerly had.

For these reasons, the judgment is affirmed.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice & Crow.  