
    Board of Education of the Cleveland City School District v. URS Company, Appellant; Dow Chemical Company, Appellee.
    [Cite as Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 188.]
    (No. 94-2378
    Submitted April 4, 1995
    Decided May 17, 1995.)
    
      Hahn Loeser & Parks, Mark E. Staib and Royce R. Remington, for appellant.
   The discretionary appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425. Only that portion of the court of appeals’ opinion that finds the indemnification and contribution claims of URS Company to be time barred by R.C. 2305.131 is reversed. The portion of the appellate opinion addressing URS Company’s fraud claims is affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., dissents.  