
    Samuel Burstein, Appellant, v. Arthur Castellano, Defendant, and Pauline Castellano, Defendant-Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    March 24, 1943.
    
      
      Samuel Burstein, appellant in person.
    No appearance for defendant-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff was entitled to have a garnishee execution. The City Court order fining the defendant for contempt and directing installment payments of five dollars a month is not a bar to obtaining a garnishee execution under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

Shientag, Bosenman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.  