
    MITCHELL, Respondent, v. O’GORMAN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 18, 1910.)
    Action by Grace W. Mitchell against William J. O’Gorman.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

THOMAS, J., dissents, u^on the ground that plaintiff’s counsel persisted in asking questions known to him to be improper, and thereby making suggestions that were prejudicial to the defendant.  