
    Boutross Bros. v. United States
    No. 5626
    Invoice dated Shanghai, China, April 22, 1939.
    Certified April 24, 1939.
    Entered at New York, N. Y., October 14, 1941.
    Entry No. 847257.
    (Decided April 30, 1942)
    
      Siegel & Mandell for the plaintiffs.
    
      Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Ausler, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal to reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is stipulated and agreed by and between counsel as follows:
That the issue involved in the above mentioned reappraisement appeal is the same in all material respects as the issue involved in the case of The United States v. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc., Customs Appeal No. 4245, decided January 4, 1940, C. A. D. 88.
That the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of China, for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States is the appraised value thereof, less the amount added under duress.
That the proper basis of appiaisal of the merchandise herein is the export value.
That there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.
That the record in The United States v. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc., C. A. D. 88, maybe incorporated into the record in this case and that the reappraisement appeal may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the respective records.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise, here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.  