
    Jacinto Z. Montes Rodriguez, Respondent, v Edward Catalano et al., Appellants.
    [949 NYS2d 69]
   — In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated October 3, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by providing evidence establishing that the plaintiff pedestrian entered a roadway from “between stopped cars,” began crossing the roadway at a “fast” pace, and came into contact with the right, rear side of a moving bus, and thus crossed the roadway in such a manner that the defendant bus driver was unable to avoid contact with the plaintiff (see Mancia v Metropolitan Tr. Auth. Long Is. Bus, 14 AD3d 665 [2005]; Blazer v Tri-County Ambulette Serv., 285 AD2d 575, 576 [2001]; Carrasco v Monteforte, 266 AD2d 330, 331 [1999]; Brown v City of New York, 237 AD2d 398, 398-399 [1997]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant bus driver operated the bus in a negligent manner (see Mancia v Metropolitan Tr. Auth. Long Is. Bus, 14 AD3d at 665). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.  