
    CUMMINS v. BRIDGES.
    No. 3505.
    Opinion Filed May 12, 1914.
    (140 Pac. 1146.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Verdict—Evidence. Where there is competent . evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict of the jury, _ under proper instructions from the court, this court will not disturb the verdict.
    (Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)
    
      Error from County Court, Jefferson County; B. T. Price, Judge.
    
    Action by W. J. Bridges against B. V. Cummins. Judg-‘. ment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
    Affirmed.
    
      Bridges & Vertrees, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. G. Clift, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This is an action on a promissory note for $380.15, balance due on an open account for ' lumber. Defendant filed an answer, asking for credit of $223.39 for material returned; $7.05 for broken glass; $7 expended in obtaining glass; $50 for difference in price and grade of lumber;' and $50 for damages.' These questions were properly submitted" to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of W. J. Bridges and against B. V. Cummins for $180.76. There being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, this court will not disturb the same.

The judgment of the lower court should therefore be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  