
    No. 64418.
    Naftone, Inc. v. United States,
    protest 59/28050 (New York).
   Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described on the invoice as “Synthetic Iron Oxide 140-SO” was actually entered after the rate had been reduced by T.D. 52739, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.  