
    13227.
    Farmers Bank of Vidette v. Roberson.
    Decided May 10, 1922.
    Complaint; from city court of Waynesboro —Judge W. H. Davis. December 14, 1921.
    
      E. V. Heath, for plaintiff in error.
    
      H. C. Hatcher, contra.
   Luke, J.

1. The alleged newly diseovéred evidence is merely cumulative and is not of such character as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial.

2. Under ali the facts of the case, the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  