
    Lojza BLAZEVSKI, Appellant, v. Cvetko BLAZEVSKI, Appellee.
    No. 92-2166.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Oct. 15, 1993.
    Gary S. Edinger of Hankin, Beverly & Edinger, P.A., Gainesville, for appellant.
    Charles P. Vaughn, Inverness, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions to the trial court to include specific values and marital/non-marital designations in its order of equitable distribution as required by section 61.075(2), Florida Statutes (1991). See McMonagle v. McMonagle, 617 So.2d 373 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Bussey v. Bussey, 611 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring.

While I concur with the opinion of the majority I add that if appellant should again seek to have reversed the decisions of the trial judge regarding asset distribution, etc., then this court must have a complete transcript of all testimony and any other evidence upon which the decisions are based.  