
    Maureen I. ROSGA, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Maurice N. ROSGA, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 60014.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 7, 1992.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 19, 1992.
    Richard Alan Cooper, Danis, Reed, Murphy Garvin, Tobben & Schreiber, Clayton, for respondent, appellant.
    Maureen I. Rosga, pro se.
    Alan Agathen, Boisaubin & Agathen, Clayton, for petitioner, respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the provision of a dissolution decree dividing the marital property. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, no error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth our reasons for affirming the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  