
    STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Nicolaus MORRIS, Appellee.
    Nos. 2D14-267, 2D14-268.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 8, 2015.
    
      Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Christina Zuccaro, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.
    Timothy R. Taylor of Timothy R. Taylor, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
   NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The State appeals downward departure sentences imposed in two cases following Nicolaus Morris’s open pleas of guilty. We reverse.

Morris pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident with injury and to reckless driving causing serious bodily injury. The scoresheet noted a prior misdemeanor conviction for reckless driving, and it included points for both severe and moderate victim injuries. The lowest permissible prison sentence indicated by the score-sheet was just under four years in prison (44.175 months). The prosecutor argued for a five-year prison term plus probation.

Morris, who was nineteen years old at the time of the offenses, sought youthful offender sentencing. The circuit court declined to consider that alternative. Instead, it imposed sentences of three years in prison, suspended the sentences, and placed Morris on two years of community control followed by three years’ probation. When asked to state a basis for the downward departure, the court replied “lack of prior record.”

A downward departure occurs-when a prison sentence is indicated on a scoresheet but the court imposes a suspended prison term and probation. State v. Kutz, 157 So.3d 380, 382 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (citing State v. Brannum, 876 So.2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)). Downward departure sentences are improper when based solely on factors that are already accounted for in the sentencing guidelines. State v. Sachs, 526 So.2d 48, 50 (Fla.1988). That is the case here.

[T]he lack of prior convictions cannot be a basis for a downward departure. The sentencing guidelines are designed to reflect prior convictions by adding additional points and thereby increasing the length of the recommended sentence. A sentence which is recommended for a defendant without prior convictions is just that; it presupposes that he has never before been convicted of a crime. Hence, the absence of prior convictions cannot be a basis for departing under the recommended sentence.

Sanders v. State, 510 So.2d 296, 297 (Fla.1987). Although Sanders was decided pri- or to the advent of the current Criminal Punishment Code, a defendant’s prior record continues to be factored into his permissible sentence under the Code. §§ 921.0021(5), .0024, Fla. Stat. (2012). For this reason, Morris’s departure sentence based on his minimal prior record was improper.

We reverse and remand for imposition of lawful sentences.

VILLANTI, C.J., and BLACK, J., Concur.  