
    William M. Reed, Respondent, v. N. E. Vail & Co., Inc., Appellant.
   Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.. While it was error to strike out testimony given by plaintiff on his -examination in supplementary proceedings, we think it was not prejudicial to the defendant, as other testimony on the same subject was subsequently received.

Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ.  