
    6773.
    Dinkins v. The State.
    Decided October 26, 1915.
    Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Eastman — Judge Neese. June 30, Í915.
    
      W. M. Morrison, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. H. Roberts, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, J.

I. Motions for new trials because of alleged newly discovered evidence are not favored by reviewing courts; and when as in this case, such evidence is merely cumulative and impeaching in its character, a new trial will not be granted.

2. The evidence fully sustained, the verdict. Judgment affirmed.  