
    John Peacock v. John H. Boyle et al.
    
    Petition in Error — Review. A general jury finding, based on disputed facts and conflicting testimony, and being approved by the district court, will not be disturbed.
    
      Error from Osage District Court.
    
    The opinion states the case.
    
      JB. F. Hendrix, and Ellis Deiois, for plaintiff in error.
    
      TJtley & Martin, for defendants in error.
   Per Curiam:

Action to recover upon a promissory note and to foreclose a land contract, assigned as security for the payment of the note. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff alleges error.

The general finding of the jury is based upon disputed facts and conflicting testimony, and, being approved by the district court, must stand. (K. P. Rly. Co. v. Kunkel, 17 Kas. 145.)

There is nothing substantial in the objection to the rulings of the court on the admission of testimony. Judgment affirmed.  