
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Paul DYKE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-6260.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 19, 2005.
    Decided May 26, 2005.
    John Paul Dyke, Appellant pro se.
    
      Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent'in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

John Paul Dyke appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to substitute counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We conclude that Dyke cannot show prejudice arising from the district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. See Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 966 (4th Cir.1987) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  