
    WEBER, Respondent, v. FORGOTSTON, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    June 5, 1896.)
    Action by Irene Weber and another against Etta Forgotston.
    J. C. De la Maro, for appellant. W. J. Lippman, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

So far as the questions of law are concerned, they are disposed of by the case of Palmer v. Jones, 69 Hun, 240, 23 N. Y. Supp. 584. So far as the facts are concerned, we entirely agree with the conclusion reached by the justice at the special term. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.  