
    JOHN M. ALLRED v. THE UNITED STATES.
    [No opinion in C. Cls. R.; 155 U. S. R., 591.]
    
      On the defendants’ Appeal.
    
    This was a claim for fees as commissioner of the Circuit Court for the northern district of Georgia. Appended to the petition was a statement of the items of the petitioner’s account. The Court of Claims, upon the evidence, found the facts to be as follows:
    1. The claimant, John M. Allred, was a commissioner of the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of Georgia from May 28, 1889, to March 31,1892, duly qualified and acting.
    2. During said period he made up his accounts for services, duly verified, and presented the same to the United States court for approval in the presence of the district attorney, and an order approving the same as being just and according- to law was entered of record. Said accounts were then presented to the accounting officers of the United States Treasury Department for payment. Part was paid, but payment of the items embraced in finding- in was refused.
    
      3. (1) For entering on warrant the judgment of final disposition of the case, as required by ruie of court, one folio each, at 15 cents each, $53.55.
    Rule 6 of the Circuit Court requiring this service is as follows: * * * “And, after holding an examination, he must enter in the blank on the back of the warrant his final' action, in which, if hound or committed, he shall specify the particular offence or offences for which the party is held.”
    (2) For making transcript of proceedings in various cases, as required by rule of court, to be sent up to court, at 15 cents per folio, $62.65.
    (3) For hearing and deciding on criminal charges in various cases where the proceedings consisted of taking bail and passing on the sufficiency thereof, six days, at $5 per day, $30.
    (4) For issuing separate warrants of arrest for certain defendants oharged with separate and distinct offences committed at different times and places, at $1 each; entering return, 15 cents, and filing; 10 cents, $67.40.
    (5) For drawing reports of attendance and mileage of witnesses, and orders for the marshal to pay each witness in duplicate, in excess of 60 cents in each case, and administering oath to witnesses, as to attendance and mileage, at 10 cents each, $37.
    (6) For making copy of each subpoena for marshal to serve on the witness, at 10 cents per folio, with certificate, at 15 cents each, as required by rule of court, $24.35.
    (7) For issuing warrant of commitment of defendants to jail for further examination in default of bail, entering return of marshal, and filing same, at $1.25 each, $5.30.
    The jailer would not receive a prisoner without a warrant of commitment, and the marshal had no place to confine the prisoner outside of the jail.
    (8) For making report to clerk of court and commissioner of internal revenue of cases heard and disposed of under the internal revenue laws, as required by rule of court, at 15 cents per folio, $7.20.
    (9) For administering oaths to deputy marshals to verify their aecorrnts of service, as required by the Attorney-Gen eral and accounting officers of the Treasury, at 10 cents each, and drawing jurats to same, at 19 cents, $18.25.
    (10) For making entries on the docket in various cases, consisting of name of affiant, his official position, if any, date of issuing warrant, name of defendant and witnesses, and final disposition of case, as required by rule of court, at 15 ceuts per folio, $43.50.
    (11) For filing and entering 131 separate papers filed in various cases, at „ 10 cents each, $13.10.
    (12) For administering oaths to witnesses to testify in various cases, at 10 ceuts each, $4.40.
    
      Upon the foregoing findings of fact the court determined as a conclusion of law that the claimant should recover, except for item 5 finding hi, the sum of $329.70, for which amount judgment was entered and defendant appealed.
    The decision of the court below is affirmed.
   Mr. Justice Brown

delivered the opiniou of the Supreme Court January 7, 1895.  