
    Eady et al. v. Magnolia Cemetery Company et al.
    
   Gilbert, J.

Where the judge’s certificate to a bill of exceptions verifies it in part only, and shows it to be in part untrue, the certificate is not a lawful one, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Hawkins v. Americus, 102 Ga. 786 (30 S. E. 519); Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781 (33 S. E. 660); Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262); Priester v. Bray, 138 Ga. 69 (74 S. E. 757); Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Mills, 143 Ga. 47 (84 S. E. 120); Love v. Love, 146 Ga. 160 (91 S. E. 27); Adamson v. Bradley, 147 Ga. 328 (93 S. E. 894). The certificate to the bill of exceptions in the present case is fatally defective, in the light of the foregoing decisions.

No. 9162.

October 12, 1932.

Spence & Spence, for plaintiffs.

T. M. Smith and J. V. Poole, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.  