
    472 S.E.2d 619
    In the Matter of William Hastings HENSEL, Respondent.
    No. 24449.
    Supreme Court of South Carolina.
    Submitted May 28, 1996.
    Decided June 17, 1996.
    Louis P. Howell, Spartanburg, for respondent.
    Attorney General Charles Molony Condon and Senior Assistant Attorney General James G. Bogle, Jr., Columbia, for complainant.
   PER CURIAM:

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent conditionally admits to engaging in misconduct and agrees to be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days, retroactive to the date of his temporary suspension. We accept the conditional admission.

Respondent admits that he pled guilty to one count of failure to make and file a South Carolina Income Tax return in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 12-54-40(b)(6)(c) (Supp.1995) and was sentenced to imprisonment for one year or payment of a $500 fine.

The failure to file a tax return is a serious crime as set forth in Paragraph 2(P) of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR. By his conduct, respondent has violated Rule 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR, by committing a criminal act that reflects adversely upon his honesty, trustworthiness and fitness as a lawyer and has violated Paragraph 5(E), of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR, by engaging in conduct tending to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute.

In our opinion, respondent’s misconduct warrants a definite suspension from the practice of law for ninety days. Accordingly, respondent is suspended for ninety days, retroactive to May .8, 1996, the date of his temporary suspension. Within fifteen days of the date of this opinion, respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Paragraph 30 of Rule 413, SCACR.

DEFINITE SUSPENSION. 
      
      . The complaint against respondent alleges he failed to file returns for two additional years not covered by his guilty plea.
     