
    15313.
    Meek v. The State.
    Decided April 16, 1924.
    Conviction of manufacture of liquor; from Paulding superior court — Judge Irwin. December 28, 1923.
    
      A. L. Bartlett, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. 8. Griffith, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. The evidence was conflicting and would have authorized the defendant’s acquittal, but it also authorized his conviction, and, the finding of the jury against him having been approved by the trial court, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke atnd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  