
    In re Robert WILKEY, Respondent.
    No. 14-BG-1000.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed Nov. 26, 2014.
    BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and RUIZ, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Pennsylvania for a total of 30 months, this court’s September 24, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of 30 months with his reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause but did file a timely affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Robert Wilkey is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 30 months, nunc pro tunc to September 24, 2104. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007); In re Coleman, 919 A.2d 1135, 1137 n. 4 (D.C.2007).  