
    
      OPINION ISSUED JULY 31, 2006
    
    AT&T VS. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS
    (CC-06-179)
    Claimant appeared pro se.
    
    Charles P. Houdyschell Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $ 152.50 for long distance telephone service provided in April 2001 for Huttonsville Correctional Center, a facility of the respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for Hie fiscal year in question from which to pay the invoice; therefore, no payment was made.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.  