
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mariano RODRIGUEZ-GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-41294
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 9, 2016.
    Paula Camille Offenhauser, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    James Scott Sullivan, Esq., Law Offices of J. Scott Sullivan, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Mariano Rodriguez-Guerrero (Rodriguez) appeals his sentence of 57 months of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. He argues that the district court committed reversible error in imposing a two-level weapon enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 201.1(b)(1) because the Government did not prove that he had personal possession of the weapon or that it was reasonably foreseeable to him that another person involved in the offense had possession of the weapon.

This court reviews de novo the district court’s legal application of § 2Dl.l(b)(l). United States v. Zapata-Lara, 615 F.3d 388, 390 (5th Cir.2010). This court reviews the district court’s factual findings for clear error. United States v. King, 773 F.3d 48, 52 (5th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1865, 191 L.Ed.2d 741 (2015).

The evidence in the presentence report reflected that Rodriguez and a codefen-dant were apprehended after leaving a residence in a van carrying 464.78 kilograms of marijuana. A search of the residence led to the discovery of a loaded firearm, ammunition, and two bundles of marijuana in the master bedroom and bathroom. While recognizing that Rodriguez had not been in actual or constructive possession of the weapon, the district court determined that there was a relationship between the weapon and the. drug-trafficking offense and that the weapon’s presence was reasonably foreseeable to Rodriguez.

In rejecting the same argument made in the appeal of Rodriguez’s codefendant, this court found that the district court’s detailed factual findings were sufficient to plausibly establish a temporal and spatial relationship between the weapon, the drug-trafficking activity, and the cocon-spirators. See United States v. Adrian Rodriguez-Guerrero, 805 F.3d 192, 196 (5th Cir.2015). The court further determined that the evidence made it plausible for the district court to find that the weapon’s purpose was to facilitate the drug trafficking and that the fact that the weapon could not be attributed to a specific drug trafficker did not decrease the danger of violence arising from its presence. Id.

Based on the reasoning in Rodriguez-Guerrero, we reject Rodriguez’s argument that the district court committed reversible error in imposing the two-level enhancement based on possession of the weapon in connection with the drug-trafficking activity. See Rodriguez-Guerrero, 805 F,3d at 196. The sentence is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     