
    No. 50555.
    Protests 69130-K, etc., of Daimaru Co. et al. (San Francisco).
   Opinion by

Cline, J.

In view of the stipulation and the cited authorities, which records were admitted in evidence herein, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Certain items similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Nippon Co. (32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303), were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1705 as kelp, and other items were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured; and (2) merchandise the same as that the subject of Enbun v. United States (19 C. C. P. A. 79, T. D. 45224) was held dutiable at 1% cents per pound under paragraph 717 (c) as dried fish.  