
    Case No. 15,547.
    UNITED STATES v. KURTZ et al.
    [4 Cranch, C. C. 682.] 
    
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    March Term, 1836.
    Larceny—Evidence—Confessions.
    If a person, arrested for larceny, makes a confession, to the officer, as to that larceny, under a promise, by the officer, to do what he could for him if he would tell where the stolen goods were; and afterwards, before the magistrate, without any new promise, or threat or question, makes a confession of a different larceny, such latter confession is admissible evidence against the party upon his trial for such latter .larceny.
   Indictment [against Kurtz, Tarlton, and Spaulding] for stealing “fifteen pieces of silver coin of the value of fifty cents each, and twenty pieces of silver coin of the value of twenty-five cents each, of the moneys, goods, and chattels of one Nicholas Callan." A former indictment for the same theft had been'quashed because the description of the property stolen was too vague. LCase No. 15.546.]

The defendant Spaulding having been arrested by two of the constables. Robinson and Jeffers, upon a charge of stealing the goods, of one Singstack, * was .told by them that they could not discharge him; and must take him before a magistrate, but that if he . would tell them where the goods could be found, they would do what they could for him. The defendants were suspected also of having stolen Callan’s money on a former day. but nothing was said by the constables to Spaulding about that theft of Callan’s money, when they told him they would do what they could for him. Spaulding told Robinson where to find Singstack’s goods, and they were found accordingly. Spaulding made other confessions to Robinson about Singstaek’s goods; and afterwards, without any new promise, made confession before the justice, as to Callan’s money.

In the trial of Spaulding for stealing Sing-stack's goods THE COURT rejected his confession made under the promise of favor; but in the trial of Spaulding and others, for stealing Callan’s money, THE COURT admitted his confession as to that theft; there having been no promise as to that charge, nor any request that he would confess. The confession was not made to Robinson, but to the justice.

Verdict guilty. Sentenced to the penitentiary. Pardoned.  