
    Tumey v. The State of Ohio.
    
      Supreme Court — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 19611
    Decided May 11, 1926.)
    Error to tlie- Court of Appeals, of Hamilton county.
    
      Mr. Harry H. Shafer and Mr. Edward P. Moulinier, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Murphy & Joseph; Mr. Allen C. Boudebush, and Mr. Charles M. Earhart, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.  