
    Richard Dinerman, Respondent, v Joseph Poehlman, Defendant, and City of New York, Appellant.
    [656 NYS2d 41]
   In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the wrongful issuance of a building permit, the defendant City of New York appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated January 19, 1996, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss the affirmative defense of governmental immunity and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint and the cross claim insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss the defense of governmental immunity is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint and cross claim are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant.

The plaintiff asserts in his complaint that the defendant City of New York wrongly issued a building permit to his neighbor, permitting the construction of a garage which did not comply with the applicable zoning laws. Whether to grant a building permit "is a discretionary determination and the actions of the government in such instances are immune from lawsuits” (City of New York v 17 Vista Assocs., 84 NY2d 299, 307; see, Arteaga v State of New York, 72 NY2d 212, 217; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511; Tango v Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34, 40; Rottkamp v Young, 15 NY2d 831, affg 21 AD2d 373, for reasons stated at App Div). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.  