
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio REYES-ENCINAS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-30287.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.
    
    Decided Feb. 16, 2006.
    James A. Goeke, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Mary C. Geddes, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Rogelio Reyes-Encinas appeals his 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

Rogelio Reyes-Encinas contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based on a prior conviction that was neither proved to a jury nor admitted during the plea colloquy. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 & n. 16 (9th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed, No. 05-8847 (filed Jan. 23, 2006); United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 914 & n. 8 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 636, 163 L.Ed.2d 515 (2005); United States v. Von Brown, 417 F.3d 1077, 1078-79 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     