
    Nuan Wal CHOY, Petitioner, v. PEKIN RESTAURANT, LaSalle National Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 38836.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 24, 1969.
    Peter S. Schwedocfc of the Law Offices of Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for petitioner.
    Rose & Marlow, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin 'Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 26, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.  