
    Hodnett v. The State.
    Argued June 15,
    Decided June 25, 1903.
    Accusation of larceny. Before Judge Hollingsworth. City court of Fayetteville. April 27, 1903.
    
      J. W. Wise, for plaintiff in error.
    
      A. O. Blalock, solicitor, and F. F. Bpurlin, contra.
   Candles, J.

There being nothing in the evidence to identify the goods found in the possession of the accused as those alleged to have been stolen, or to connect him in any way with the crime, the verdict finding him guilty should have been set aside as contrary to the evidence.

Judgment reversed-.

All the Justices concur.  