
    Julia S. GRIMSLEY, Petitioner, v. The FLORENCE CRITTENDEN HOME et al., Respondents.
    No. 36526.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 11, 1967.
    Robinson & Randle, Jacksonville, for petitioner.
    Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorneys’ fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ„ concur.  