
    Roberts v. Southern Grocery Company.
    April 23, 1914.
    Eviction. Before Judge Conyers. Appling superior court. May 24, 1913.
    
      Bolling Whitfield, for plaintiff in error. S. 0. Townsend, contra.
   Hul, J.

The sole contention, in this ease is that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence. The evidence being of such a character as to warrant the jury in finding the property subject to the levying fi. fa., the judgment of the court refusing the claimant a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.  