
    SYLVESTER v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    May 21, 1913.)
    Cbiminal Law (§ 1097*) — Appeal—Statement of Facts.
    The grounds of the motion for a new trial cannot be considered, in the absence of the statement of facts.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097.*]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.’
    Paul Ss'lvester was convicted of theft, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. .Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of theft; his punishment being assessed at four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The transcript of the record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The grounds of the motion for new trial cannot be considered, in the absence of the statement of facts.

There being no reversible error apparent in the record, the judgment is ordered to be affirmed.  