
    Columbus Railroad Company v. Asbell.
    April 13, 1911.
    Action for damages. Before Judge Gilbert. Muscogee superior court. May 31, 1910.
    
      F. U¡ Garrard, Cecil Neill, and Hatcher & Hatcher,- for plaintiff in error.
    
      William A. Little and A. W. Cozart, contra.
   Atkinson, J.

1. The requests to charge, which were refused, in so far as they announced correct principles of law, were sufficiently covered by the general charge.

2. The excerpts from the charge, of which complaint was made, when considered in the light of the general charge, present no ground for reversal.

3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.  