
    15782.
    FREEMAN v. CALVERT MORTGAGE COMPANY.
    The evidence' demanded the verdict directed by the court.
    Exception to the overruling of the demurrer could not properly be taken "in a motion for a new trial.
    Decided November 13, 1924.
    Complaint; from Laurens superior court—Judge Kent. June 31, 1934.
    
      F. N. Freeman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      I. S. Chappell, contra.
   Luke, J.

1. The evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, for principal, interest, and attorney’s fees provided for in the notes sued on, and the court properly directed the jury so to find.

3. The ground of the motion for a new trial which complains of the judgment sustaining a demurrer to the defendant’s answer can not be considered, for the reason pointed out in Southern Ry. Co. v. Cook, 106 Ga. 450 (1) (33 S. E. 585), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  