
    Gregorio Pascual MARTINEZ-ZALDIVAR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-72511.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.
    
    Filed Oct. 17, 2006.
    Law Offices of Norma M. Molinar, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Genevieve Holm, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is construed as a motion for summary disposition in part and a motion to dismiss in part. So construed, the motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review in part for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See Ekimian v. INS., 303 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir.2002).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in PART and DISMISSED in PART. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     