
    Daniel F. Young, Inc. v. United States
    No. 6389.
    Entry No. 706357, etc.
    Invoices dated London, England, August 1944, etc.
    Certified August 1944, etc.
    Entered at New York, N. Y., September 19, 1944, etc.
    (Decided September 27, 1946)
    
      Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the‘additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.  