
    JACOB, Respondent, v. E. V. CRANFALL CO., Appellant.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    April 28, 1897.)
    Action by Julius Jacob against E. V. Cranfall Company.
    Herman Herst, for appellant.
    William King Hall, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The sole question in dispute herein is, did the plaintiff perform the duties required from him by virtue of his contract with the defendant? That question of fact, in our opinion, was properly submitted to the jury, and the evidence fully justifies their finding in plaintiff’s favor, and the judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.  