
    Kareemah BELL-BOSTON, Appellant v. CAPITAL HILL HYATT REGENCY, Appellee.
    No. 08-7148.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    March 30, 2009.
    Kareemah Bell-Boston, Landover Hills, MD, pro se.
    BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed December 2, 2008, 2008 WL 5085621, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any other basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.  