
    Randy—The Salon, Respondent, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Appellants.
    [605 NYS2d 1023]
   Motion for permission to file and serve reply brief denied. Memorandum: The motion is unnecessary. On October 1, 1993, the Court granted respondent’s motion to strike appellants’ brief with leave to refile. After a proper appellants’ brief is filed and served and responded to, appellants will have the opportunity to file a timely reply brief. Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed Oct. 25, 1993.)  