
    GEORGE R. MILLS, Appellant, v. ROBERT PORTER, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee. The only question involved in this case, was, whether or not the defendant had sold a certain note to one Wood, and thereby warranted the title thereto. The General Term held that there was no sale, but a mere assignment for the ■purpose of collection, and affirmed the judgment below.
    
      Cornelius E. Stephens, for the appellant.
    
      E. S. Merrell, for the respondent.
   Opinion by Gilbert, J.

Judgment affirmed.  