
    Henry H. Crawford & another vs. Hiram E. Capen.
    Tort, by members of a partnership, against a deputy sheriff, for breaking and entering the plaintiffs’ close, and removing certain articles of personal property therefrom. The defendant justified under a writ against one of the partners, upon which he attached the goods of the firm, and removed them.
    At the trial in the Superior Court, Knowlton, J. ruled that partnership property might be attached upon a writ against one partner. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant; and the plaintiffs alleged exceptions.
    
      H. W. King, for the plaintiffs.
    
      F. T. Blackmer, for the defendant.
   By the Court.

This case falls within the decision in Sanborn v. Royce, supra. Exceptions sustained.  