
    JONES v. TULL.
    No. 4619.
    Opinion Filed June 8, 1915.
    (149 Pac. 1189.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error has filed, no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. yi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment of the trial court - will be affirmed.
    (Syllabus by Rittenhouse, 0.)
    
      Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge.
    
    Action by E. Jones against W. L. Tull. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
    Affirmed.
    
      Peyton & Pyles, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Clark J. Tisdell, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on December 4, 1912; neither party has filed a brief, nor have - they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The judgment of the trial court should, therefore, be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  