
    14919.
    Eason v. The State.
    Decided November 15, 1923.
    Accusation of possession of.liquor; from city court of Eloyd county—Judge Nunnally. July 16, 1923..
    
      C. I. Carey, for plaintiff in error.
    
      James Maddox, solicitor, contra.
   Luke, J.

The defendant complains that her conviction was not authorized by the evidence. The evidence was conflicting, but, the jury having believed the evidence for the State, showing her guilt, and the trial judge having approved the verdict, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

Affvrmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorlh, J., concur.  