
    Walter A. INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-03249.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 9, 1992.
   PER CURIAM.

Ingram appeals the dismissal of his post-conviction relief motion. We affirm. The trial court properly dismissed Ingram’s motion because it did not comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987. We also find that the claims Ingram raises to support his motion are without merit.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.  