
    *Nichols’ and Janes’ Case.
    June Term, 1850.
    Lewd and Lascivious Cohabitation — Indictment-Allegations as to Time.—In an indictment for lewd and lascivious cohabitation, the offence is charged from a day prior to the day when the statute went into effect, but as continuing to a day after the commencement of the act. The indictment is good.
    At the April term 1849 of the Circuit court of Scott county, James Nichols, sr., and Rena Janes, were indicted for that they being white persons, on the 1st *day of May 1848, and from thence up to the 8th day of April 1849, at the county &c., did without being married to each other, lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together.
    The parties demurred to the indictment, upon the ground, as it seems, though the causes of demurrer are not set out, that the statute upon which the indictment was founded, did not go into operation until the 31st of May 1848. The demurrer was overruled by the Court; and thereupon the parties pleaded not guilty, on which issue was joined.
    On the trial of the cause the Court excluded from the jury all evidence of acts charged in the indictment, previous to the 1st of June 1848, at which time the law under which thejr were prosecuted took effect. And there was a verdict against each of the parties for a fine of fifty dollars ; and a judgment accordingly. Whereupon the defendants applied to this Court for a writ of error, assigning for error that the demurrer to the indictment had been overruled.
    
      
      Lewd and Lascivious Cohabitation—Indictment-Allegations as to Time.—See principal case distinguished in Sledd v. Com., 19 Gratt. 818. See generally, monographic note on “Indictments, Informations and Presentments” appended to Boyle v. Com.. 14 Gratt. 674.
      Same—Same—Joinder of Defendants.—An indictment for lewd and lascivious cohabitation may be either joint or separate. Scott v. Com., 77 Va. 346, citing the principal case; Com. v. Isaacs & West, 5 Rand. 634; Com. v. Jones, 2 Gratt. 555. See the principal case also cited in State v. Poster, 21 W. Va. 774. See generally, monographic note on “Indictments, Informations and Presentments” appended to Boyle v. Com., 14 Gratt. 674.
    
   By the Court.

The writ of error is denied.  