
    UNITED STATES v. SUTHON.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    February 7, 1899.)
    No. 732.
    Sugar Bounty—Construction or Statute—Producer or Sugar.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
    J. Ward Gurley, for plaintiff in error.
    E. H. Farrar, for defendant in error.
    Before PARDEE, Circuit Judge, and BOARMAN and SWAYNE, District Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

These cases were before this court at a former term on a plea of no cause of action liled by the United States. It was then held that the petitions were good in law, and, if the facts alleged were proven, the plaintiff was entitled to judgment (Suthon v. U. S., 26 C. C. A. 628, 81 Fed. 810), and they are now before v. on writs of error 1aken by the United States from judgments below rendered on the facts. They are submitted, without argument, on the suggestion that, if the court adheres to the same views expressed on the former hearing, the judgments of the court below should be affirmed. On consideration, we think Suthon v. U. S., supra, was correctly ruled, and the judgments of the circuit court, are affirmed.  