
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Luis Alberto NAVARRO, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-50588.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00150-NM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 12, 2004.
    
    Decided Jan. 15, 2004.
    Ronald L. Cheng, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Joey L. Blanch, USR-U.S. Attorney’s Office Riverside, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Lisa M. Bassis, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before BEEZER, HALL and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Luis Alberto Navarro appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for one count of illegal re-entry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) with an enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Navarro has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     