
    Thomas Glen MORGAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 64304, 64313.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 7, 1995.
    Gary Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, Matthew J. O’Connor, St. Joseph, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  