
    DOUGHERTY v. NEVADA BANK.
    ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
    No. 98.
    Argued and submitted December 6, 1895.
    Decided December 9, 1895.
    
      Wood v. Brady, 150 U. S. 18, affirmed and applied to this case.
    This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error to foreclose a municipal-tax or street assessment lien. In a brief filed for defendant in error it was stated that the judgment here sought to be reversed involved the validity of precisely similar extensions to' those sought to be reversed in Wood v. Brady, 150 U. S. 18, and under the same statute. This statement was not denied or challenged by the counsel for the plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. J. O. Bates for plaintiff in error submitted on his brief.
    
      Mr. James G. Maguire for defendant in error.
    
      Mr. John Garber, Mr. John H. Boalt, and Mr. Thomas B. Bishop filed a brief for defendant in error.
   Mr. Justice Field :

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of Wood v. Brady, 150 U. S. 18.

Writ dismissed.  