
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rohan Wilson TEAGNE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-6006.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 16, 2002.
    Decided May 22, 2002.
    Rohan Wilson Teagne, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce A. Pagel, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Rohan Wilson Teagne seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Teagne, Nos. CR-98-33; CA-01-530-7 (W.D.Va. July 16, 2001; Oct. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.  