
    FOSTER v. STATE.
    No. 22250.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 25, 1942.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1943.
    Leon D. Lusk, of Houston, for appellant.
    Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in County Court at Law No. 2, Harris County, upon a charge of keeping a bawdy house and assessed a fine of two hundred dollars and twenty days in jail, from which she appeals.

The record is before us with two bills of exception which cannot be considered because each is multifarious. Each bill presents some kind of objection to testimony given by about six different witnesses and is otherwise fatally defective.

There is no contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction and we find nothing requiring further consideration.

The judgment in the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which she asserts that we erred in several respects in our original opinion: First, in holding the evidence sufficient to sustain her conviction; and second, in declining to consider her bills of exception. These matters were all considered by us on the original submission of the case. However, in view of her serious contention we have again carefully reviewed the record in the light of her motion but see no good reason why we should change our views as expressed in the original opinion.

Believing that the case was properly disposed of, the motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.  