
    C. C. Morgan, Plaintiff in Error, v. Russell Carlton by his next friend, S. J. Carlton, Defendant in Error.
    
    Opinion Filed April 19, 1917.
    Petition for Rehearing Denied May 14, 1917.
    Where there is ample evidence to sustain a. verdict, and it is clear that errors, if any, in rulings were harmless to the party complaining of them, and no material errors of procedure appear, the judgment will be affirmed.
    Writ of Error to Circuit Court for DeSoto County; J. W. Perkins, Judge.
    Judgment affirmed.
    
      Leitner & Leitner, for ^Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Brown & Jones and John B. Singeltary, for Defendant in Error. 1
   Per Curiam.

On a former writ of error herein a judgment fpr the defendant on a directed verdict was reversed. Carlton v. Morgan, 68 Fla. 535, 67 South. Rep. 79.

After the cause was remanded S. J. Carlton was made a party plaintiff as the next friend of the minor plaintiff Russell Carlton in the place of W. H. Simmons who had died. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant took this writ of error.

Considerable latitude was allowed in the presentation of evidence at the trial and the charges given were comprehensive in their general scope, but in view of all the evidence it appears that if technical errors were committed the defendant could not reasonably have been injured thereby. There is ample evidence to sustain the verdict found and no material errors of law or procedure being shown, the judgment is affirmed.

^Browne, C. J., and Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.  