
    MURPHY v. REDDY.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division. First Department.
    July 2, 1897.)
    Review on Appeal.
    When a case is heard by the court without a jury, and no exceptions to its decision are filed, the judgment cannot be reviewed on appeal.
    Appeal from special term.
    Action by James D. Murphy against Patrick Beddy. This was a suit in equity to require defendant to remove certain stones placed by him on plaintiff's premises, and was tried by the court at special term. A decision in favor of the plaintiff, stating concisely the grounds upon which the issues were decided, was filed by the court, pursuant to section 1022, Code Civ. Proc., and no exceptions thereto were filed by the defendant. Defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and RUMSEY, PATTERSON, O’BRIEN, and PARKER, JJ.
    M. E. Duffy, for appellant.
    M. J. Scanlan, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

No exceptions being filed, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.  