
    New York Superior Court
    General Term.
    Filed January 11, 1892.
    Julia Menike, Resp’t, v. The Manhattan R. Co., App’lt.
    Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the verdict of ■ a jury and from order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
    
      Davies & Sapallo, for app’lt; George J. Greenfield, for resp’t.
   Freedman, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of defendant’s servants in attempting to get on board of one of the trains of defendant’s railway. Upon the trial the defendant produced no evidence and the case was submitted to the jury upon the testimony given by and on behalf of the plaintiff. Upon such testimony the case was clearly one for the jury. A dismissal of the complaint would have been error. All ‘the questions as to which the trial judge was requested to charge were submitted to the- jury under a charge which fully guarded every right the defendant had. The jury were expressly instructed that they might render a verdict for the defendant, although the testimony of the plaintiff was uncontradicted. Upon the whole case no exception appears ■of sufficient merit to call for reversal.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

McAdam and Gtldersleeve, JJ., concur.  