
    HAMBURGER v. LIPSCHITZ et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 30, 1908.)
    Coubts—Municipal Couets—Appeal—Motion fob New Tbial—Settled Case —Review.
    An order of the Municipal Court of the city oí New 'York denying a new trial, not made on a settled case, as required by the rules of practice, cannot be reviewed by the Appellate Term.
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.
    Action by Barnet Hamburger against Abraham S. Lipschitz and another. From a Municipal Court order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, they appeal.
    Dismissed.
    Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, P. L, and MacLEAN and SEABURY, JJ.
    Thomas P. Hall, for appellants.
    Abraham I. Smolens, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The court denied a motion for a new trial, made on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was not made upon a case settled, as required by the rules of practice, and cannot, therefore, be reviewed by this court: Altmark v. Haimowitz, 55 Misc. Rep. 195, 105 N. Y. Supp. 205.

The appeal is dismissed, but, under the circumstances, without costs.  