
    Carlos Bazan et al., Appellants, v Manuel Concepcion et al., Respondents.
    [11 NYS3d 133]
   Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered February 6, 2014, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that res judicata and collateral estoppel barred the relitigation of claims arising from defendants’ determination to cede authority to the New York District of the Assemblies of God, after a dispute between members of the congregation arising from the revocation of the credentials of the church’s long-time pastor. Although this Court’s review of the prior action arising from this controversy was primarily based upon the prior motion court’s finding of mootness, we specifically found that that court’s legal and factual conclusions concerning the appropriateness of defendants’ actions were correct. Moreover, plaintiffs here are in privity with petitioners in the prior proceeding in that their interests were represented by petitioners, who had a full and fair opportunity to litigate in that proceeding (see Buechel v Bain, 97 NY2d 295, 303-304 [2001], cert denied 535 US 1096 [2002]).

The issue of whether plaintiffs’ church membership was properly revoked for “unbiblical conduct” is not a dispute subject to resolution by civil courts (see Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States & Canada v Milivojevich, 426 US 696, 709-710 [1976]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Feinman, JJ.  