
    PETE LITTLE v. STATE.
    
      No. 3087.
    Opinion Filed November 23, 1918.
    (175 Pac. 945.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Conviction—Affirmance. On defendant’s appeal by filing a petition in error with ease-made, where, no brief was filed or oral argument made, and where an examination of record disclosed that appeal was without merit, it would be affirmed on motion of Attorney General.
    
      Appeal from County Court, Carter County; Thos. W. Champion, Judge.
    
    Pete Little was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      
      J. B. Champion, for plaintiff in error.
    
      R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Pete Little, was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge that he did unlawfully transport six sacks of beer and one sack of whisky from a point near Dundee, Carter county, to a point one mile and a half southwest of Dundee, and his punishment was fixed at 30 days’ imprisonment and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court, on July 27th, a petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed nor oral argument made. For this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm the judgment. An examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.  