
    PEOPLE v CLARK
    Assault and Battery — Felonious Assault — Specific Intent.
    Specific intent is not an element of the crime of felonious assault (MCLA 750.82).
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    6 Am Jur 2d, Assault and Battery §§ 48, 51.
    Appeal from Recorder’s Court of Detroit, John R. Murphy, J.
    Submitted Division 1 June 7, 1973, at Detroit.
    (Docket No. 15738.)
    Decided July 26, 1973.
    Ronald T. Clark was convicted of felonious assault. Defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General,. William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Thomas P. Smith, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
    
      Charles Burke, for defendant.
    Before: Bronson, P. J., and V. J; Brennan and Walsh, JJ.
    
      
       Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
    
   Per Curiam.

The appellant was charged with and convicted by a jury of felonious assault (MCLA 750.82; MSA 28.277) and sentenced to a term of two to four years imprisonment.

The only issue on appeal is whether felonious assault is a specific intent crime.

This court has recently held in People v Rohr, 45 Mich App 535; 206 NW2d 788 (1973), that specific intent is not an element of the crime of felonious assault. See also People v Burk, 238 Mich 485, 489; 213 NW 717, 718 (1927).

Affirmed.  