
    *Stanard v. Brownlow.
    Monday, April 6th, 1812.
    Appellate Practice — Reversal of Decree.  — Tn a decree of reversal, the appellate Court will if requested, farther direct, that In case the money and costs recovered by the appellee shall have been paid, the same he refunded, with lawful interest from the time of payment.
    In this case, a decree of the late High Court of Chancery, dismissing a bill of Review, was reversed by this Court; the original decree was also reversed; and it was ordered that the injunction awarded the appellee, to stay proceedings on a judgment recorded against him by the appellant, be dissolved, and his bill dismissed with costs.
    
      
       See foot-note to Branch v. Burnley, 1 Call 147; foot-note to White v. Jones, 1 wash. 116; monographic note on “Appeal and Error” appended to Hill v. Salem, etc.. Turnpike Co., 1 Rob. 263.
    
   Tuesday, April 7th, Stanard, for the appellant, moved an addition to the order made yesterday ; that in case the money decreed to the appellee shall have been paid, it be decreed back.

JUDGE ROANE

observed, that a similar order had been made in the case of Branch v. Burnley, 1 Call, 160.

The following addition was therefore made to the order: “And if the amount of the money and costs recovered by the decree in the original suit, and of the costs recovered by the original decree on the bill of the review, shall have been paid to the appellee, it is further decreed, that he do repay the same to the appellant, with interest thereon, after the rate of six per centum per annum, from the time of the receipt thereof, till it be repaid.  