
    Harry Raymond et al., Copartners under the Name of Raymond, Pynchon & Co., Appellants, v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.
    Insurance— construction of alleged contract of insurance covering “ shore risk ” on horses to be shipped.
    
    
      Raymond v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 188 App. Div. 881, affirmed.
    (Argued November 19, 1920;
    decided December 7, 1920.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 13, 1919, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover upon an alleged contract of insurance. The question at issue was whether a contract of provisional insurance as evidenced by a cover" note included only a specified number of horses or included all horses to be shipped under a certain contract.
    
      Arnold L. Davis for appellants.
    
      D. Roger Englar for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.  