
    In re Cato.
    (No. 36312
    Decided May 18, 1960.)
    
      Mr. Wilford W. Cato, in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey Wendt, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors or irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.  