
    Gamble v. Sacks, Warden.
    (No. 36776
    Decided March 15, 1961.)
    
      Mr. Howard Gamble, Jr., in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities of which he complains and which he claims deprived him of his constitutional rights and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Tapt, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.  