
    L. HINES v. STATE.
    No. 19958.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 30, 1938.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1939.
    Wm. McMurrey, of Cold Springs, for appellant.
    Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

No statement of facts is brought forward.

Appellant is a negro. The two bills of exception found in the record relate to the appellant’s effort to have the indictment set aside on the alleged ground that the negro race had been discriminated against in the selection of the grand jury which returned the indictment. The court heard the testimony of three witnesses, which was in all things identical with the testimony of the same witnesses as shown in the case of Walter Ryan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 123 S.W.2d 659, this day delivered. In that case we reached the conclusion that the evidence failed to show that the omission to draw any negroes upon the grand jury which indicted Ryan was the result of purposeful discrimination against the negroes because of their race or color. Giving effect to such holding, we are constrained to overrule appellant’s contention.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for a rehearing, insists that we erred in our original opinion in holding that the trial court did not err in overruling his motion to quash the .indictment on the grounds that the negro race was discriminated against.

We have again carefully reviewed the record in the light of the appellant’s motion and remain of the opinion that the case was properly disposed of on original submission. See, also, Mitchell v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 491, 105 S.W.2d 246.

The motion for a rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been' examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.  