
    Sayles et al. v. Fields et ux. et al.
    [No. 0-552.
    Filed March 16, 1959.]
    
      Nathaniel L. Sayles, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam

This appeal must be dismissed for failure to perfect the same as required by Rule 2-3. The papers filed do not constitute a transcript or assignment of errors.

Appeal dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 156 N. E. 2d 781.  