
    Hocker versus Stricker, Under Sheriff.
    IT was ruled in this case, that before the goods are removed, the Sheriff ought to allow a reasonable time, for the Defendant in Replevin to find security on a claim of property; which, in the practice of Pennsylvania, supplies the place of a writ de proprietate probanda:
    
   And

Shippen, President,

said, that if the Jury were of opinion that a reasonable time had been refused, the Defendant, Stricker, could not, in an action of trespass, justify under the writ of Replevin. 
      
       See ant. 15 b.
     