
    AUSTIN v. STATE.
    (No. 3984.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 15, 1916.)
    Criminal Law <&wkey;1124(3) — -Appeaiy-Record —Questions Presented.
    Where no statement of the evidence heard on the trial accompanies the record, and the record contains no bill of exceptions to the admissibility of any testimony, there is no question presented in a motion for new trial which the Court of Criminal Appeals can review.
    [Ed. Noto. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2948; Dee. Dig. <&wkey;>1124(3).]
    Appeal from District Court, Houston County ; John S. Prince, Judge.
    nart Austin was convicted of robbery, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and his punishment assessed at 10 years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

No statement of the evidence heard on the trial accompanies the record, and the record contains no bill of exceptions to the admissibility of any testimony. Under such circumstances there is no question presented in the motion for a new trial we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.  