
    Bridgman vs. Gregory & Bloodgood.
    An order for a bill of particulars is duly served by delivering a copy; the ‘ original need not be shown.
    The question here was, whether the original order for a August, 1837. bill of particulars must be shown to the party called on for the bill, or whether service of a copy is sufficient.
   By the Court, Nelson, Ch. J.

All orders which do not-require personal service, may be served by copy. See 1 Archb. Pr. 23. So also it was held by this court in The Utica Bank v. Kibby, 7 Cowen, 148.  