
    MOORE v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 20, 1912.)
    Intoxicating- Liquors (§ 205) — Informa - TIO N — SUFFTCIEN CY — J URISDICTI ON.
    An indictment for violating the local option law, presented in the district court, and alleging that defendant on January 20, 1911, violated the local option law, which election was held on March 5, 1910, properly alleges the date of the election, conferring jurisdiction upon the district court.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Intoxicating Liquors, Cent. Dig. § 225; Dec. Dig. § 205.]
    Appeal from District Court, Bowie County; P. A. Turner, Judge.
    Henry Moore was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other eases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law; his punishment being assessed at one year’s confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment alleges it was presented in the district court of Bowie county, and charges appellant did on the 20th day of January, 1911, violate the local option law, which election was held on the 5th day of March, 1910, in said Bowie county, etc. This indictment is correct. See Head v. State, 141 S. W. 536, decided at the present term of the court. It properly alleges the date of the election, which confers jurisdiction upon the district court. The law changing the punishment from misdemeanor to felony became operative in Bowie county by reason of the date of the election set out in the indictment.

The record contains neither statement of facts, nor hills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.  