
    Alfred A. Whitman, Appellant, v. Charles L. Munnich et al., Respondents.
    
      Whitman v. Munnich, 175 App. Div. 946, affirmed.
    (Submitted January 31, 1919;
    decided February 25, 1919.)
    Appeal from á judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 15, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict in an action upon a promissory note. Two questions were submitted to the jury: Whether or not in the inception of the note the defendants acted and relied upon false representations, fraud and deceit and false promises; and if so, whether or not plaintiff's assignors took the note in good faith without knowledge and notice of the fraud.
    
      Maxwell C. Katz and Otto C. Sommerich for appellant.
    
      Thomas Watts, Elbert N. Oaks and John Bright for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.  