
    Popham v. Snider.
    APPEAL from the Kosciusko Circuit Court.
    
      II. C. Newcomb and J. Tarkington, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.-

In this case, no question is raised except as to the correctness of the ruling of the Court below on a motion for a continuance. On the supposition that the ruling was erroneous, the error was waived, as no new trial was asked for. Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675.

The judgment below is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.  