
    Commonwealth ex rel. Fordham, Appellant, v. Rundle.
    Submitted December 10, 1963.
    Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.
    Appeal, No. 338,
    
      John Fordham, appellant, in propria persona.
    
      
      Alfred Deldueo, Assistant District Attorney, and ¡Samuel J. Halpren, District Attorney, for appellee.
    March 17, 1964:
   Opinion by

Weight, J.,

• John Fordham has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County dismissing his petition, for a writ of habeas corpus.

We have carefully reviewed the original record. It reveals that, on March 18, 1960, Fordham pleaded guilty to bills of indictment charging burglary and larceny. Sentences were imposed and Fordham is presently confined in the State Correctional Institution at Philadelphia.

The sole question raised by appellant is that he was denied due process because he was not represented by counsel at the time he entered his pleas of guilty. It appears from the transcript of the proceedings that the sentencing judge advised appellant of his constitutional rights and offered to provide counsel. Appellant stated that he did not desire counsel and freely related his participation, in the several felonies. We are of the opinion that the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, relied upon by appellant, is not controlling in this situation. Appellant understood the nature of the charges against him and intelligently waived his right to counsel. There was no ingredient of unfairness or deprivation of due process.

Order affirmed.  