
    HOBSON v. STATE.
    (No. 10742.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 19, 1927.)
    Criminal law &wkey;>l 144(½) — Regularity of proceeding is presumed, absent complaint, and conviction affirmed, where record contains neither statement of facts nor bill of exceptions.
    Where record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, and indictment charges offense, conviction will be affirmed; any proceeding being presumed legal in the absence of complaint.
    Appeal from District Court, Bosque County; Irwin T. Ward, Judge.
    Harvey Hobson was convicted of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Troy Deason, of Glen Rose, for appellant.
    Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Appeal is from a conviction for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment charges the offense. In the absence of complaint at any proceeding the regularity thereof must be presumed. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.  