
    Edmond H. GALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-56943.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 24, 2011.
    
    Filed June 9, 2011.
    Edmond H. Galton, Moreno Valley, CA, pro se.
    Assistant U.S. Attorney, Esquire, Dorothy Schouten, Assistant U.S., USLA-Of-fice of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Scott J. Borrowman, Assistant Regional Counsel, SSA-Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Edmond H. Galton appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Lewis v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 909, 911 (9th Cir.2007). We affirm.

Contrary to Galton’s contentions, the Administrate Law Judge’s decision did not go beyond the scope of the remand order because, as the district court had instructed, the Administrative Law Judge on remand determined whether there was any work in the economy that Galton could perform in light of all his impairments, including dyslexia.

Galton’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     