
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginaldo VALENZUELA TORREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10614.
    D.C. No. CR-02-01283-SMM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted June 14, 2004.
    
    Decided June 18, 2004.
    Michael Thomas Morrissey, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Alex D. Gonzalez, Tempe, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HALL, LEAVY and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Reginaldo Valenzuela Torrez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Torrez has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Torrez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     