
    HOFHEINZ v. WILSON et al.
    (No. 6117.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.
    Nov. 25, 1925.)
    Appeal and error <&wkey;l!25 — No affirmance on certificate; appeal not being shown perfected.
    There can be no affirmance on certificate, under Rev. St. 1925, art. 1841; the record presented not showing'that appeal bond was filed or that the appeal was otherwise perfected.
    Error from District Court, Travis County; Geo. Calhoun, Judge.
    Action between E. J. Hofbeinz and John Wilson, and others. Judgment was adverse to Hofbeinz, and be brought error. On motion of Wilson and others to affirm on certificate.
    Motion overruled.
    Hart, Patterson & Hart, of Austin, for plaintiff in error.
    Dickens & Dickens and Harris & Harris, all of Austin, for defendants in error.
   McCLENDON, C. J.

Motion to affirm on certificate. Notice of appeal given, but the record presented does not show by certificate of tbe clerk or otherwise that appeal bond was filed or that tbe appeal was otherwise perfected. Tbis court is therefore without jurisdiction to affirm on certificate. R. S. 1925, art. 1841; Supreme Council v. Anderson, 36 Tex. Civ. App. 615, 83 S. W. 207; Brightman v. Brightman (Tex. Civ. App.) 166 S. W. 415.

Tbe motion is overruled. 
      cgx^Por other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER, in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     