
    STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph L. JANOSKI, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 61845.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 15, 1992.
    Claude Hanks, Chesterfield, for defendant/ appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for stealing property with a value of at least $150, § 570.080, RSMo 1986. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).  