
    No. 991
    STATE ex HEALTH CO. v. CONN
    No. 20083.
    No. 20077.
    Supreme Court
    In mandamus.
    Dock. Sept. 3, 1926;
    4 Abs. 623.
    Same facts and contentions.
    747. MANDAMUS — Does mandamus lie against the isupprintendent of insurance !to compel him to restore license of foreign insurance company whose license had been revoked for spending more than 30% of premiums for expenses ?
    Attorneys — T. S. Allen, Lincoln, Neb.; J. A. Shearer, Columbus, for State ex; C. C. Crabbe, Atty. Gen., C. S. Younger, Columbus, for Conn.
   This is an action in mandamus filed' against the Superintendent of Insurance to compel him to restore a foreign insurance company to do business in the state, after license had been revoked because more than 30% of company’s income from premiums etc. was used for expenses.  