
    Note.—The following- opinions of November Term, 1901, were inadvertently omitted from their proper place in Volume XVIII.—Rep.
    Alexander P. Baldwin et al., respondents, v. Mabel C. Tucker et al., appellants.
    [Filed March 3d, 1902.]
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is áffirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 412.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garrets on, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, VpooM—13.

For reversal—None.  