
    MITCHELL v. NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 11, 1914.)
    No. 2330.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Eastern District of Washington.
    Oscar Cain and Francis A. Garrecht, U. S. Attys., both of Spolcane, Wash., for plaintiff in error.
    Charles W. Bunn and Charles Donnelly, both of St. Paul, Minn., and E. J. Cannon, of Spokane, Wash., for defendant in error.
    For opinion below, see, 208 Fed. 469
   PER CURIAM.

This case having been reached in the regular call of the docket, and there being no appearance in open court of counsel for either party, and it appearing .that the record has not been printed, as required by rule 23, and that no brief has been filed by or on behalf of either party thereto, as required by rule 24, thereupon, upon consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged that writ of error be and hereby is dismissed, under section 3 of rule 22, and for failure of plaintiff in error to print record, as required by rule 23, and for failure of plaintiff in error to file a brief, as required by rule 24.  