
    Robert L. SAINZ, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Mary S. SAINZ, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 69752.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dee. 24, 1996.
    Harold G. Johnson, Mitchel D. Johnson, St. Ann, for petitioner/appellant.
    Jeffrey T. McPherson, Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly & Davis, St. Louis, for respondent/respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the trial court’s judgment modifying the decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  