
    UNITED STATES v. AH TIN.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    February 5, 1900.)
    No. 527.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
    John H. Hall, for the TJniied States.
    Before McKENNA, Circuit Justice, and ROSS and MORROW, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The facts in (his case are the same as the facts in U. S. v. Lee Seick (C. C. A.) 100 Fed. 398, and on the authority el that case the judgment is affirmed.  