
    3505 Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Anthony Smith, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    July 7, 1960.
    
      Samuel Weissman for appellant. Daniel Leeds for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The statutory provision for registered mail received substantial compliance when certified mail was used and the tenant actually received notice (Teresta v. City of New York, 304 N. Y. 440 ; Priester v. R. F. H. Realty Corp., 13 Misc 2d 446 ; Chirico v. Kings County Sav. Bank, 168 Misc. 207).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs and fiual order directed for the landlord, with costs.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.  