
    Danny J. COHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cheryl K. PLILER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-15859.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 14, 2008.
    
    Filed July 24, 2008.
    Danny J. Cohea, pro se.
    Grant Lien, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: SCHROEDER, LEAYY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     