
    [Strafford,
    June, 1889.]
    Cook v. New Durham.
    After the decision of this case (reported 64 N. H. 419) a further statement by way of amendment was obtained from the justice who tried it, by which it appeared that the evidence offered was excluded on the ground that it was legally inadmissible and not in the exercise of discretion, and thereupon the verdict was set aside.
    Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
    6r. E. Gochrane and J. Kivel, for the defendants.
    
      E. F. Gloutman and Worcester $ G-qfney, for the plaintiff.
     