
    T. A. Azar, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. M. Jones, Defendant in Error.
    
    Division B.
    Decision filed July 19, 1928.
    
      Caraballo, Moran <& Graham for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Burket c§ Fish, Harold II. Flower, F. W. Dart and F. C. Dart for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order granting a new trial herein,'and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed. See Suttles v. Burbridge, 91 Fla. 273, 107 So. R. 646.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.  