
    PATRICK CONNOLLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. NORTH JERSEY STREET RAILWAY COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued June 21, 1910
    Decided November 14, 1910.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 47 Vroom 1.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Ghauncey G. Parker and Samuel Kalisch.
    
    
      For the defendant in error, Leonard J. Tynan.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Vooehees, Mintuen, Bogebt, Yre-DENBURGH, YROOM, DlLL, CONGDON, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.  