
    16601.
    Ray v. The State.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires a rehearing of this ease.

Decided July 29, 1925.

Indictment for possessing liquor apparatus; from Haralson superior court—Judge Irwin. April 28, 1925.

Smith & Watson, for plaintiff in error.

E. S. Griffith, solicitor-general, contra.

2. There is some evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.  