
    In re Egan P. O’BRIEN, Respondent.
    No. 11-BG-1346.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed Feb. 2, 2012.
    Bar Registration No. 472249, BDN: 350-11.
    Before OBERLY, Associate Judge, TERRY and STEADMAN, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. O’Brien, 421 Md. 191, 25 A.3d 1024 (2011), this court’s November 3, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Egan P. O’Brien is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006)(rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).  