
    222 La. 984
    LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS v. McHENERY et al.
    No. 40955.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 23, 1953.
    K. Hundley, Alexandria, for Charles K. McHenery, defendant-appellant.
    Irving Ward-Steinman, Alexandria, for Mrs. Roy O. Martin et al., intervenors, appellants.
    Gist, Thornton & Murchison, Alexandria, for Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, plaintiff-appellee.
   MOISE, Justice.

Injunction proceedings were brought by the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners to restrain the defendant, Charles K. McHenery, from practicing medicine without obtaining a certificate as required under Act No. 56 of 1914 and Act No. 54 of 1918, LSA-R.S. 37:1261-1313.

Defendant filed an exception of no right or cause of action, and answered plaintiff’s petition by a general denial of the allegations, except for the admission that he did! not possess a certificate authorizing him to practice medicine or midwifery. The exceptions were referred to the merits.

Interventions were filed, but our consideration of these is not necessary because the jurisdictional question presented is controlled by the amount involved in the main demand. Opelousas St. Landry Bank & Trust Co. v. Fontenot, 173 La. 430, 137 So. 339 and Hebert v. T. L. James, Inc., 221 La. 1044, 61 So.2d 734.

After a trial on the merits, a permanent injunction was granted, and the interven-' tion was dismissed. From this judgment the defendant and interveners appealed suspensively to this Court. Plaintiff asks that this appeal be dismissed on the ground that this Court is without jurisdiction.

The amount involved herein includes the price of the certificate, the penalty of $50.00 imposed by the trial court, and the award of $50.00 attorney’s fees. Obviously, this sum is far below the $2,000.00 jurisdictional amount of this Court. La. Const. Art. 7, Sec. 10; Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. Smith, 221 La. 1026, 61 So.2d 513; and New Orleans & Northeastern R. Co. v. Redmann, 210 La. 525, 27 So.2d 321. Succession of Wesley, 222 La. 411, 62 So.2d 625.

Section 1, Article 7 of the Constitution of 1921 provides that

“In all cases where there is an appeal from a judgment on a reconven-tional or other incidental demand, the appeal shall lie to the court having jurisdiction of the main demand.” Hebert v. T. L. James, Inc., supra.

Act No. 19 of 1912, LSA-R.S. 13:4441 authorizes the transfer of an appeal to the proper court rather than its dismissal. Therefore,

It is ordered that this case be and it is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, the transfer to be made within 30 days from the date on which this decree becomes final; otherwise, the appeal shall be dismissed. Costs of this Court to be borne by appellants.  