
    21990.
    Currie v. The State.
    Decided February 17, 1932.
    
      W. A. Dampier, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. A. Merritt, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized by the evidence, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial (based upon the usual general grounds only) was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.  