
    EMLEN T. LITTELL and HELEN A. LITTELL, His Wife, vs. WILLIAM J. LITTELL, Individually and as Executor.
    
      Bale of Decedents Property.
    
    A bill brought under Code, Art. 16, Sec. 137, for the sale of a decedent’s property, held not to be multifarious.
    
      Decided February 20, 1920.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Howard County, in Equity (Moss, J.).
    The cause was argued before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattison, Urner, Stockbridge, and Adkins, JJ.
    
      Daniel M. Murray, Francis Key Murray, D. G. Higenbothom, Fdw. Breckenridge Lowndes, and Edward Guest Gibson, for the . appellants.
    
      Edwin J. Farber, for the appellee.
   Stockbridge, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court, affirming the order appealed from, with costs.  