
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael Christopher SCHMITT, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-50500.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 15, 2006.
    
    Filed July 24, 2006.
    Shanna L. Dougherty, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Chase Scolnick, FDSD — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Michael Christopher Schmitt appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We reject Schmitt’s contention that the supervised release statute violates the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. ^006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     