
    In the Matter of the Application of William Willett, Jr., Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus against Charles S. Devoy, Clerk of the County of Kings, Respondent.
    Second Department,
    July 31, 1914.
    Appeal — duty of County Court to transmit copy of notice of appeal, etc., in criminal case, without charge, to clerk of Appellate Division.
    A county clerk is bound under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure to transmit to the clerk of the Appellate Division, without charge, a certified copy of the notice of appeal, judgment roll and a transcript of the stenographer’s minutes of the proceedings upon the trial of a criminal case.
    Appeal by the plaintiff, William Willett, Jr., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 26th day of May, 1914, denying his motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus.
    
      Otho S. Bowling, for the appellant.
    
      Hugo Hirsh, for the respondent.
   Burr, J.:

Two questions are presented upon this appeal: First, was it the duty of the county clerk of Kings county to transmit to the clerk of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court a certified copy of the notice of appeal, judgment roll and a transcript of the stenographer’s minutes of the proceedings upon the trial in the Criminal Term of the said Supreme Court of the action of People v. Willett, and, second, is he entitled to charge a fee for his services in connection therewith ?

Where an appeal is taken from a judgment of conviction obtained at a Criminal Term of the Supreme Court to the Appellate Division thereof, the statute requires that Upon the appeal being taken, the clerk, with whom the notice of appeal is filed, must, within ten days thereafter, without charge, transmit a copy of the notice of appeal and of the judgment-roll, as follows: 1. If the appeal be to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, to the clerk of the department where the appeal is to be heard.” (Code Grim. Proc. § 532.)

When a notice of appeal has been served, the papers which constitute the judgment roll are as follows:

“ 1. A copy of the minutes of a challenge interposed by the defendant to a grand juror, and the proceedings and decision thereon;

“ 2. The indictment and a copy of the minutes of the plea or demurrer;

“3. A copy of the minutes of a challenge, which may have been interposed to the panel of the trial jury, or to a juror who participated in the verdict, and the proceedings and decision thereon;

“ 4. A copy of the minutes of the trial;

“ 5. A copy of the minutes of the judgment;

“ 6. A copy of the minutes of any proceedings upon a motion either for a new trial or in arrest of judgment;

“ 7. The case, if there is one.” (Code Grim. Proc. § 485.)

This section must be read in connection with sections 456 and 458 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which, so far as here material, areas follows: “Where the defendant is convicted of a crime not punishable by death the clerk of the court in which the conviction was had shall within two days after a notice of appeal shall be served upon him notify the stenographer that an appeal has been taken whereupon the stenographer shall within ten days after receiving such notice deliver to the clerk of the court a copy of the stenographic minutes of the entire proceedings of the trial certified by the stenographer as an accurate transcript of such proceeding. Such copy shall be filed by the clerk in his office and shall constitute the minutes of the court of the trial and be included in the judgment roll as provided by section four hundred and eighty-five of this act.” (Code Grim. Proc. § 456.) And “ When the defendant intends to appeal from a judgment entered, after a trial of an issue of fact where he is convicted of a crime not punishable by death it shall not be necessary to make a case or bill of exceptions as prescribed in this section but the appeal shall he heard upon the judgment roll including the copy of the minutes of the trial filed as prescribed by section four hundred and fifty-six of the Code of Oriminal Procedure. .Within thirty days after the service of a notice of appeal the appellant shall procure to he printed as required hy the General Rules of Practice the record upon which the appeal is to be heard and cause the same to be filed with the clerk of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in which the appeal is to be heard duly certified by the clerk of the court in which the conviction was had.” (Id. § 458.)

We conclude, therefore, that under the statute as now amended and in force it was the duty of the county clerk, within ten days after a notice of appeal was filed in the case above referred to, to transmit to the clerk of the Appellate Division a copy of the notice of appeal and of the judgment roll, including therein a copy of the minutes of the trial delivered to him by the stenographer and certified by such stenographer to be an accurate transcript of the proceeding, and that it was the duty of the appellant within thirty days after such notice of appeal is filed to procure to be printed the record upon which the appeal is to be heard, and to file a copy duly certified by the county clerk (the clerk of the court in which the conviction was had) with the clerk of this court. In this case, although a copy of the stenographic minutes of the entire proceedings in the criminal court, duly certified by the stenographer, was delivered to the county clerk and annexed to and made part of the judgment roll, he did not transmit a copy thereof to the clerk of this court. Subsequently appellant submitted to him a printed copy of such record, admitted to be a correct copy thereof, and requested that he certify the same and transmit it to the clerk of this Appellate Division. The relator refused todo this unless paid fees at the rate of one cent per folio for such copy. It was clearly the duty of the county clerk to transmit such copy, and of necessity he must certify as to its correctness before it could be accepted and filed as required. The statute requires him to do this “without charge. ” His demand for a fee for such service was unjustified.

In addition, we may call attention to the rule that “A person who accepts an office to which no compensation is attached is presumed to undertake to serve gratuitously, and he cannot recover anything upon the ground of an implied contract to pay what the service is worth.” (Mech. Pub. Off. §§ 855, 856; Throop Pub. Off. §§ 446, 447; Pub. Off. Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 47; Laws of 1909, chap. 51], § 67; Judiciary Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 30; Laws of 1909, chap. 35], § 252.) Our attention has not been called to any statute authorizing the county clerk to charge a fee for such services in a criminal case.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus should be granted, with twenty-five dollars costs.

Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus granted, with twenty-five dollars costs.  