
    J. Hallett Lovell et al., Respondents, v. John Roebuck, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Oourt of the city of New York, third district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiffs.
    Edmund F. Driggs, for appellant.
    Herbert J. Hindes, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs’ cause of action was abundantly sustained by the evidence. The defendant repeatedly admitted the correctness of the account except as to a few small items which appear to ‘have been allowed to him. The counterclaim seems to have been an afterthought, as it was wholly disallowed; it is of no consequence whether the justice was right or wrong in i of using the motion to allow defendant to increase the amount for which he counterclaimed. -

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.  