
    CRISMAN v. STATE.
    (No. 7645.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 14, 1923.)
    Criminal law <&wkey;ll44(l/2> 17) — Everything presumed in favor of correctness of judgment and regularity of proceedings, where no. bills of exception nor statement of facts.
    On appeal everything must be presumed in favor of the correctness of judgment and regularity of the proceedings, where there were no bills of exception nor statement of facts.
    Appeal from District Court, Grayson County ; P. E. Wilcox, Judge.
    Albert Crisman pleaded guilty of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Upon his plea of guilty to burglary, appellant’s punishment was'assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Notwithstanding the plea of guilty, the record is before us on appeal. No statement of facts and no bills of exception appear.

Everything must be presumed in favor of the correctness of the judgment and the regularity of the proceedings.

The judgment is affirmed. 
      ig^For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     