
    4793.
    Glass v. Lowry National Bank.
    Decided September 23, 1913.
    Complaint; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Beid. January 25, 1913..
    
      T. 0. Battle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Tindall & Silverman, contra.
   Russell, J.-

There being no evidence offered in support of the defendant’s plea that the note sued on was without consideration, it was immaterial whether the plaintiff’s -purchase of the note was before or after maturity; and for this reason the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed.  