
    Robert MELTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 63863.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 19, 1994.
    Susan K. Eckels, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  