
    Ernest S. WALTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 84868.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    May 10, 2005.
    Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Karen L. Kramer, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorneys General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ernest S. Walton, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of facts and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  