
    HAYS v. HUDGENS.
    No. 13901
    Opinion Filed Sept. 30, 1924.
    Rehearing Denied May 5, 1925.
    Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3.
    Error from District Count, Marshall County'; Geol. S. March, Judge.
    Action between Louisa Hays, by J. W. Johnson, guardian, and O. F. Hudgens. From the judgment, the former appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Minter & McClendon and Geo. E. Rider, f<V.‘ plaintiff in error.
    C. A. Coakley and Thomas Norman, for defendant in errolr.
   Opinion by

JONES, G.

The facts in this case are practically identical ui.th, and governed by the same rules of law, as the ease of Louisa Hays v. Woods et al., 110 Okla. 45, 236 Pac. 3, wherein the judgment of the trial court was affirmed and a discussion of the issues involved, and citations of authorities will be found, and are here referred to and adopted as the opinion in’ this case, and we therefore recommend that this case be affirmed,

By the Court: Tt is sc. ordered.  