
    GARLOCK v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    January 14, 1902.)
    Action by Emogene Garlock, as administratrix, etc., against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied, with $10 costs, upon the authority of Sciolina v. Preserving Co., 151 N. Y. 50, 45 N. E. 371, and Meeker v. Remington & Sons Co. (opinion by O’Brien, J., court of appeals; not published).  