
    9402.
    Beck v. Armour Fertilizer Works.
    Decided May 17, 1918.
    Complaint; from Murray superior court—Judge Tarver. November 3, 1917.
    
      E. II. Bech, W-. E. Mann, for plaintiff in error.
    
      King & Starr, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict.’ Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur. (  