
    PEOPLE v POTTS
    1. Criminal Law — Sentence—Juvenile Record.
    A defendant’s juvenile record may properly be considered by the trial court in determining the sentence to be imposed.
    2. Criminal Law — Plea of Guilty — Enumeration of Rights.
    Acceptance of a defendant’s plea of guilty is valid even though he is not informed of his privilege against self-incrimination, his right to confront his accusers, and his right to a non jury trial.
    References for Points in Headnotes
    
       47 Am Jur 2d, Juvenile Courts and Delinquent and Dependent Children § 56.
    
       21 Am Jur 2d, Criminal Law § 495.
    Court’s duty to advise or admonish accused as to consequences of plea of guilty, or to determine that he is advised thereof. 97 ALR2d 549.
    Appeal from Van Burén, David Anderson, Jr., J.
    Submitted Division 3 February 1, 1972, at Lansing.
    (Docket No. 11797.)
    Decided February 29, 1972.
    Reversed, conviction vacated, and remanded to circuit court, 387 Mich 809.
    Louis C. Potts was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of aiding a prisoner to escape, as a second offender. Defendant appéals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and William C. Buhl, Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
    
      Arthur J. Tarnow, State Appellate Defender, and David A. Goldstein, Assistant Defender, for defendant.
    
      Before: Danhof, P. J., and T. M. Burns and Van Valkenburg, JJ.
    
      
       Former circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Const 1963, art 6, § 23 as amended in 1968.
    
   Per Curiam.

The defendant pled guilty to a charge of aiding a prisoner to escape, MCLA 750-.183; MSA 28.380. After the plea was accepted the prosecutor filed a supplemental information, pursuant to MCLA 769.13; MSA 28.1085, charging the defendant as a second offender. The defendant again pled guilty and a sentence of 7 to 10-1/2 years was imposed. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in considering his juvenile record in sentencing. This was not error. People v Coleman, 19 Mich App 250 (1969); People v Charles Williams, 19 Mich App 544 (1969).

The defendant contends that reversal is required because he was not informed of his privilege against self-incrimination, his right to confront his accusers, and the right to a nonjury trial. No error occurred, People v Jaworski, 25 Mich App 540 (1970).

Defendant contends that he was misled regarding the possible sentence. The record is inadequate for appellate determination of this question. Matters of this type should he first raised in the trial court where an evidentiary hearing can he held.

Affirmed.  