
    Standard Distilling Co. v. J. A. Freyhan.
    [Filed April 7, 1892.]
    Final Order: Quashing Summons is Not. An order of the district court quashing the service of a summons cannot he reviewed by this court before final judgment is rendered in the action.
    Error to the district court for Colfax county. Tried below before Marshall, J.
    
      Phelps & Sabin, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Grimison & Thomas, contra,
    
    cited: Brown v. Bice, 30 Neb., .236.
   Norval, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse the ruling of the district court sustaining the defendant’s motion to quash the service of the summons. The transcript fails to show that a final judgment has been entered in the court below. The case is ruled by Persinger v. Tinkel, ante, p. 5. It was there held,that the court would not review an order of the district court quashing the service of a summons until after the final disposition of the action, for the reason that such ruling is not a final order. The petition in error is

Dismissed.

The other judges concur.  