
    WETMORE v. DEAN.
    Certiorari — Return—Conoeusiveness.
    The return of a justice of the peace to a writ of certiorari is conclusive.
    Error to Mason; McAlvay, J.'
    Submitted February 8, 1905.
    (Docket No. 107.)
    Decided April 21, 1905.
    Assumpsit by Frank E. Wetmore against Charles M. Dean for the amount of¡a judgment. Plaintiff had judgment in the justice’s court, and defendant appealed to the circuit court by writ of certiorari.There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
    Reversed.
    
      Wallace Foote, for appellant.
    
      Virgil A. Fitch, for appellee.
   Moore, C. J.

The plaintiff obtained judgment in justice’s court against defendant. The case was removed to the circuit court by certiorari, where the judgment was reversed. The case is brought here by writ of error. There were a good many reasons assigned in the affidavit for the writ why the judgment should be set aside. An inspection of the record shows that each of these reasons was fully answered by the return of the justice. This return must be regarded as conclusive. Young v. Kelsey, 46 Mich. 414; Rawson v. McElvaine, 49 Mich. 194; Mann v. Tyler, 56 Mich. 564; People v. Hux, 68 Mich. 477. We think, instead of reversing the judgment of the justice, it should have been affirmed.

Judgment is reversed, and the judgment rendered in justice’s court is affirmed, with costs of both courts.

Carpenter, Grant, Blair, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.  