
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mauricio HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-7406
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 31, 2017
    Decided: February 3, 2017
    Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio Hernandez-Martinez seeks to appeal the Government’s opposition to a motion in his criminal case. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Hernandez-Martinez does not appeal from an order of the district court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED  