
    Joseph DIEUVIL, Appellant, v. ROYALE FLORIDA ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee.
    No. 3D18-864
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed December 5, 2018
    Behren Law Firm, and Scott M. Behren (Weston), for appellant.
    COFFEY | BURLINGTON, and Susan E. Raffanello, for appellee.
    Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding: "When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal. The trial court should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.")  