
    McHugh v. Astrophe.
    (City Court of New York
    General Term,
    February, 1893.)
    An equity action may by order be taken from its regular place upon the calendar and put upon short cause calendar as a preferred cause.
    It is immaterial that the order recites that the trial shall take place in a part of the court where equity causes are not tried, if in fact it appears on the calendar of the proper part and is answered to by the attorneys.
    The respondent failed to pay motion costs awarded appellant by a prior General Term. Held, 'that the order should be reversed, with leave to renew upon payment of said costs.
    Appeal from an order. The opinion states the case.
    
      Emile B. Morel, for plaintiff (respondent).
    
      Booram, Hamilton c& Beckett, for defendant (appellant).
   Fitzsimons, J.

This being an equity action, the trial must be without a jury. The order appealed from does not attempt to take away that right.

The action was ordered for trial as a preferred cause on the short cause calendar, which is in the court a calendar made up of equity causes and actions on contract that may be tried within one hour.

The fact that the said order recites that the trial shall take place hi part two instead of part four, the latter being the equity trial part, is inconsequential, plainly a clerical error, and was so regarded by the calendar clerk and the attorneys for the parties hereto, because the action was actually placed on part four calendar, and there appeared and was answered to by said attorneys.

The justice sitting in that part when it appears for trial will try it without a jury, as are all equity actions tried.

The justice who made the order had a right to do so, if in the interests of justice he deemed it proper to order a speedy trial herein.

The appellant cannot complain, having received due notice ■of trial.

Any cause may be taken out of its regular place on the calendar by the court and made a preferred cause, and a speedy trial ordered, if, as above stated, justice so requires.

This is an inherent right which the court has, and does not depend upon nor is it restricted by any section of the Code of Civil Procedure. Smith v. Keepers, 5 Civ. Proc. Rep. 66.

The only objection to the order is, that respondent failed to pay the costs awarded appellant by a prior General Term of this court.

The costs so awarded were motion costs, and until paid, all proceedings of respondent are stayed by virtue of section 779 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

For this reason the order appealed from must be reversed, but without costs, with leave to respondent to apply again for such an order upon payment of the unpaid costs just mentioned.

McGowh and Yah Wyck, JJ., concúr.

Order reversed.  