
    3336, 3337.
    ROBERTS v. NATIONAL BANK OF TIFTON.
    These eases are controlled by the decision this day rendered in Hansford v. national Banh of Tifton, ante, 270.
    Decided January 15, 1912.
    Action for .damages; from city court of Tifton — Judge Eve.
    March 7, 1911.
    
      C. C. Hall, Glaude Payton, for plaintiff.
    
      Pulwood & Murray, for defendant.
   Powell, J.

While in particular facts these cases differ somewhat from the case of Hansford v. National Bank of Tifton, in general principle they are covered by it. In these cases the prosecution was for cheating and swindling, whereas in that case it was for carrying concealed weapons. Both of these offenses are simply violations of penal laws, of this State, with the enforcement of which national banks have no concern whatever.

Judgment affirmed.  