
    SUPERIOR COURT.
    Fleury agt. Brown.
    
      July Term, 1852.
    This was a similar motion to the preceding case of Fleury agt. Roger. The complaint was on a promissory note, with allegations similar to those in that case.
    The answer alleged that the defendant had been informed and believed that the plaintiff had passed away the note, &c., and was not now the lawful holder and owner, &c. The pleadings were verified.
    J. B. Coppinger, for Motion.
    
    J. F. Robinson, Opposed.
    
   Bosworth, J.

Decided this motion in the same way—ordered the answer to be stricken out, with $10 costs.  