
    Sandy ALTRICHTER, Janell Crumley Black, Darlene Davis, Lois Hazmilton, Rose Marie Hodges, Gloria Jones, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INAMED CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, McGhan Medical Corp., Cui Corporation, Donald McGhan, Defendants.
    No. 05-11993.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 2, 2006.
    Ralph I. Knowles, Jr., Leslie J. Bryan, Doffermyre, Shields, Canfield & Knowles, Atlanta, GA, Ernest H. Hornsby, Farmer, Price, Hornsby & Weatherford, L.L.P., Dothan, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    Jeremy Maltby, Charles C. Lifland, O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: BLACK, HULL and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, this Court concludes that the Appellant has not shown reversible error in the narrow result reached in the district court’s order of 22 August 2003, as substantially limited, in effect, by its order of 16 March 2005. Because the district court’s orders, read together, limit the purpose for which the information in the documents at issue may be used at this time and permit plaintiffs to petition the district court further “as the need arises,” we need not at this time address the full scope of the Settlement Class Counsel’s access rights or whether Settlement Class Counsel would be entitled to documents for other purposes.

AFFIRMED.  