
    Pasqual Antonio Riche, Resp’t, v. Lawrence Martin, App’lt.
    Defendant’s motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.
    
      A. J. Rose, for motion; A. C. Astarita, opposed.
   Bischoff, J.

In view of the fact that plaintiff’s recovery is substantially the sum which defendant conceded to be due him on the trial, this motion seems to be without merit.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Daly, Ch. J., and Pryor, J., concur.  