
    Martin Murphy, Appellant, v. Frank McQuade, Respondent.
    (City Court of New York, General Term,
    July, 1897.)
    Counterclaim in tort.
    Where a complaint alleges an assault, upon á day and at a place named, and the answer is a denial, except that it alleges that the defendant did not on that day do anything to the plaintiff except in self-defense, and it further sets up a counterclaim for damages arising out of an assault made by the plaintiff upon the defendant on the same day and at the same place, “and against which defendant defended himself as aforesaid,” the answer sufficiently connects the subject of the counterclaim with the subject of the action to allow the assault to be interposed as a counterclaim, and this notwithstanding the fact that the action sounds in tort.
    Appeal by plaintiff from interlocutory judgment overruling his demurrer to defendant’s counterclaim.
    Herbert H. Gibbs, for appellant.
    A. M. & G. Card, for respondent.
   Van Wyck, Ch. J.

The complaint alleges' that defendant assaulted plaintiff on a day and at a place named. The answer denies these allegations, except that it alleges that defendant did not on that day do anything to plaintiff, except defend himself from the attack of plaintiff, and sets np a counterclaim for damages for an assault made by the plaintiff upon defendant on the same' day and at the same place, against which defendant defended himself as aforesaid. The answer sufficiently connects the subject of the counterclaim with the subject of the action; The subject of both was'the affray, between plaintiff and defendant on the day and at the place alleged. A tort can be counterclaimed in an action in tort, if it is connected with the subject of the action. Carpenter v. Insurance Co., 93 N. Y. 552. In an action for damages for defendant’s negligence in driving his wagon against plaintiff’s wagon, the defendant may counterclaim for damages to. his person and property occasioned by the same collision, and which he claims was caused by plaintiff’s-negligence. Heigle v. Willis, 50 Hun, 588. The order and interlocutory judgment are affirmed with costs. , ’

/

McCarthy, and Scotchman, JJ., concur.

Order and judgment affirmed, with costs.  