
    James Phillip MEGGS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; Rick Jackson, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-6739.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 31, 2006.
    
      James Phillip Meggs, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

James Phillip Meggs appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meggs v. North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-00061 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  