
    Stifel v. Metz.
    Motion to strike cause No. 122 on the general docket from the files, on the ground tbat the record, etc., have not been printed.
    
      Jacob Wolf, for the motion.
    
      Forrest § Mayer, contra.
   By the Court.

The petition was filed in 1877, and, consequently, is governed as to printing by rule 5. The act -of 1878, which took effect September 1, 1878 (75 Ohio L. -804, § 5, incorporated in the Rev. Stat., § 6711), has no application, as to the matter of printing, to cases pending in this court previous to September 1, 1878.

Motion overruled.  