
    VAN ARSDALE-OSBORNE BROKERAGE CO. v. UPDEGROVE.
    No. 2163.
    Opinion Filed October 15, 1912.
    INSURANCE — Action on Premium Notes — Set-off. Syllabus same as in Van Arsdale v. Edwards, 24 Oída. 41, 101 Pae. 1123.
    
      Error from District Court, Woods County; R. H. Loufbourrow, Judge.
    
    Action by plaintiff- in error, plaintiff below, against defendant in error, defendant below. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
    Reversed and remanded.
    
      E. L. Foulke, C. A. Matson, and Sandon J. Vigg, for plaintiff in error.
    
      E. W. Snoddy and F. W. Madison, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

AMES, C.

This case must be reversed and remanded upon the authority of Van Arsdale, etc., v. Edwards, 24 Okla. 41, 101 Pac. 1123, in which the facts are substantially the same.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  