
    Scholls, et al. vs. Shriner.
    Error to Montgomery County Court, on a .judgment in an action of replevin, for the plaintiff, (now defendant in error.) The pleas, avowry and replications, were all stated short in the record. The verdict and judgment being for the plaintiff, the defendants brought a writ of error to this court.
    If tlie pleadings in a fecord tiansmitted to the court of appeals hv writ of error, are entered *»bort, the •judgment must be fcje vevsed
    The cause was argued before Chase, Ch. J. and Ni«j cholson, Earle, and Johnson, J.
    
      Shaaff, for the Plaintiff in error.
    This court has decided, that where the pleadings were not set out at length in the record, the judgment of the court below cannot be ■sustained.
    No Counsel appeared for the Defendant in error.
   JUDGMENT REVERSE©  