
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian Randolph JOHNSON, a/k/a Zaafir Siefullah Saafir and Julian Alonzo Crim, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-50142.
    D.C. No. CR-04-00545-JFW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.
    
    Decided Oct. 18, 2005.
    Steve Kim, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Suzanne M. Lachelier, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Julian Randolph Johnson appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence of 12 months and 1 day for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Johnson has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     