
    Guillermina Bernal HIDALGO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 02-70927.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Dec. 12, 2003.
    Suzanne B. Friedman, Esq., Law Offices of Suzanne B. Friedman, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Regional Counsel, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Anh-Thu P. Mai, Office of Immigration Litigation, OIL, Alison R. Drucker, Esq., Christine A Bither, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Guillermina Bernal Hidalgo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7), without opinion, an immigration judge’s removal order and denial of her application for cancellation of removal. Petitioner’s contention that the BIA’s streamlining regulations violate an alien’s right to due process and are void for vagueness is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche, 350 F.3d 845, 850-52 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the BIA’s streamlining procedure does not violate an alien’s due process rights).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     