
    People, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Piris, Defendant and Appellant.
    District Court of Ponce.
    No. 2093.
    Decided July 24, 1923.
   The first assignment of error was the insufficiency of the information which charged the theft of “personal property valued at more than $100” without further description or identification of the property.

The Fiscal agreed that the information was fatally defective and the Supreme Court so held, reversing the judgment appealed from.

Mr. Justice Hutchison

delivered the opinion of the court.  