
    Charles Scribner’s Sons v. S. M. N. Marrs, State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
    No. 4381.
    Decided June 10, 1925.
    (273 S. W., 793).
    School Text Books — Contract—Waiver and Election — Mandamus—Suit Against State — Case Followed.
    This case being governed by the rulings in Laidlaw Bros. Inc. v. Marrs, 114 Texas, 561, mandamus is awarded in accordance with the opinion therein, which is approved and followed. (Pp. 571, 572).
    Original application to the Supreme Court, by Chas. Scribner’s Sons, for writ of mandamus against Marrs as Superintendent of Public Instruction.
    
      Batts & Brooks, and James U. Hart, for relator.
    
      Dan Moody, Attorney-General, and Wright Morrow, G. A. Wheeler, and L. G. Sutton, Assistants, (W. G. Love, of counsel), for respondent.
   MR. JUSTICE PIERSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

Relator seeks a mandamus against respondent to require him to do and perform the ministerial or statutory duties which it has a leg’al right to have performed in regard to its contract with the State of Texas for the purchase of certain textbooks, to-wit: Five book edition series of English Grammars, called 11 English Today,” by Meek and Wilson.

This case in point of fact and law is identical with that of Laidlaw Brothers, Incorporated, vs. S. M. N. Marrs, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, (ante, p. 561) opinion delivered June 8, 1925, and all issues here involved were thoroughly considered in connection with that case. It would serve no useful purpose to restate the facts or the law in this case.

Upon the authority of that case, it is ordered that the writ of mandamus issue as prayed for.  