
    Isaac Meyers, Respondent, v. The Anwal Realty Corporation, Appellant.
    
      Contract — brokers — commissions — action to recover broker’s commissions on sale of real property — defense that plaintiff was not a broker and had not been employed as such.
    
    
      Meyers v. Anwal Realty Corp., 222 App. Div. 65, affirmed.
    (Argued June 18, 1928;
    decided July 19, 1928.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 13, 1927, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The action was to recover broker’s commissions upon a sale of real property-belonging to defendant. The defense was that plaintiff was not a real estate broker and that there was no employment of him by defendant as such.
    
      H. M. Schaap for appellant.
    
      Samuel Meyers and Morse S. Hirsch for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ. Not sitting: Crane, J.  