
    Wm. L. Poynter v. M. Delph.
    Vendor and Purchaser — Courts—Correction of Error in Deeds.
    After title to land sold, has been corrected by court proceedings, it is not error to require the vendor to convey the land, acknowledge the deed, and deposit same for record, instead of first producing it to the court for inspection.
    APPEAL EEOM MARION CIRCUIT COUET.
    December 17, 1870.
    
      ■James, for appellant.
    
    
      Smith, for appellee.
    
   OPINION OE THE 0OURT BY

JtTDGE PETERS :

The only objection to the title to the land as pointed out by this court was removed after the return of the cause to the court below, and as Delph’s title is now unquestionable, and his conveyance will invest the appellant with a perfect title, we can not say that it is an error for which this court should reverse the judgment by requiring Delph to convey the land, and acknowledge the deed, and deposit it with the clerk of the county court for record, instead of first producing it to the court below for inspection, especially as the case is retained on the docket, and the circuit court has the power to remedy any defect in the deed required to be made.

As to the allowance of 30 days for appellee to pay the money and prevent a sale, he is not prejudiced by that indulgence, and can not complain of it.

Judgment affirmed.  