
    25576.
    Walden v. The State.
    Decided May 19, 1936.
    
      J. Q. Bowden, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeGraw, John H. Hudson, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis except that of the defendant’s guilt of the offense charged; and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (several of which are too incomplete to raise any question for the consideration of this court) show no cause for another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.  