
    DAVIS v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 30, 1912.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1090*) — Appeai>-Record— Bill oe Exceptions — Necessity.
    In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the appellate court cannot review alleged error in not granting accused’s motion for a continuance.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; bee. Dig. § 1090.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Franklin County; P. A. Turner, Judge.
    Will Davis was convicted of robbery by the use . of firearms, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      O. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was tried in the district court of Eranklin county under an indictment charging him with robbery by the use of firearms. He was convicted, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

There are no bills of exception found in the record, neither is there a statement of facts. The only matter presented for review by this court is found in the motion for new trial, and the only error assigned therein is that the court erred in not granting defendant’s motion for continuance. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, this is not properly presented for review by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.  