
    Willie Fred SIMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 5D11-2665.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Dec. 16, 2011.
    Willie Fred Sims, Milton, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Willie Fred Sims [“Sims”], asserts that the jury instruction for manslaughter by intentional act given at his trial constituted fundamental error and that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance when he failed to raise this issue on direct appeal. This Court’s decisions in Hodges v. State, 64 So.3d 142 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), and Burton v. State, — So.3d -, 2011 WL 1326258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), compel that we grant relief to Sims.

Sims argues that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the un-preserved but fundamental error caused by the court giving the standard jury instruction for manslaughter by act, which was held to be defective in State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010), approving Montgomery v. State, 70 So.3d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

Sims was tried in March 2009, just after the First District’s decision in Montgomery was released, and his appeal was in the pipeline at the time that State v. Montgomery was decided by the supreme court. State v. Montgomery was decided on April 8, 2010, and the mandate was issued in Sims’ direct appeal in October 2010.

In Hodges, the defendant was convicted of attempted second-degree murder after being tried for attempted first-degree murder. He filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel because appellate counsel failed to raise the issue of whether the attempted manslaughter jury instruction given in his trial was fundamental error. In Hodges, as in this case, the error was unpreserved below. As noted in the Hodges opinion: “Given the Florida Supreme Court’s April 2010 Montgomery decision, we are bound to conclude that appellate counsel should have raised the issue at the appellate level.... ” Hodges, 64 So.3d at 143 (citing Minnich v. State, — So.3d-, 2011 WL 265765 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)); Bailey v. State, — So.3d -, 2011 WL 265769 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Sharpe v. State, 39 So.3d 342 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Asberry v. State, 32 So.3d 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Toby v. State, 29 So.3d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

We grant the petition and remand for a new trial on the attempted first-degree murder charge.

PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.  