
    THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MARCH, Appellant.
    Criminal Law. — Eeview on Appeal. — Bill . of Exceptions.— Where the matters assigned as errors are decisions made by the trial court in matters of law, there is nothing for the-appellate court to review where the exceptions made to the rulings of the lower court are not properly saved by a bill of exceptions or otherwise.
    (No. 595.
    Decided June 12, 1895.
    40 P. R. 708.)
    Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District. Hon. William H. King, Judge.
    
    William March appeals from a judgment of conviction..
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Messrs. Warner é Knight, for appellant.
    
      Mr. Joseph T. Richards, Assistant U. S. Attorney, for respondent. •
   Smith, J.:

This case is in all respects like the case of U. S. v. Duggins (just decided), ante, p. 430, 40 Pac. 707, except, that the offense for which this defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted was a different, offense from that in the Duggins case. All the matters assigned as errors in. the brief of defendant are decisions made upon the trial, in matters of law. No attempt was ever made to save exceptions to such a ruling, by bill of exceptions or otherwise. Under such circumstances there is nothing for this court to review. The judgment of the district court is. affirmed, and the cause remanded to that court, with, directions to enforce its judgment.

Meeeitt, C. J., and Bartch, J., concur.  