
    August Johnson, Plaintiff in Error, vs. E. E. Stoudemire and Isom Beasley, Defendants in Error.
    
    136 So. 606.
    Special Division B.
    Decision filed September 14, 1931.
    
      Martin & Martin, for Plaintiff in Error.
   Per Curtam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Wi-iitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.  