
    JOHN KOSKO and Another v. LAWRENCE HAY.
    
    October 22, 1896.
    Nos. 10,304 — (180).
    Findings Sustained.
    Evidence considered, and held sufficient to justify the finding of the trial court.
    Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Belden, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a finding in favor of plaintiff for $51.85.
    Affirmed.
    
      J. N. Becomes, for appellant.
    
      Albert H. Hall, for respondents.
    
      
       Reported in 68 N. W. 607.
    
   BUCK, J.

This action was brought in justice court to recover damages for alleged negligence in partially destroying a buggy of the plaintiffs. Upon trial the defendant had judgment in his favor, but upon appeal to the district court, and a trial therein without a jury, the plaintiffs obtained an order for judgment in their favor. There are no material questions of law raised by the appeal; and the. weight of evidence, in the absence of manifest error, was a matter for the trial court to decide. Its finding was clearly supported by the evidence, and the order denying the motion for a new trial is affirmed.  