
    DAVIS v. EXCELSIOR CO.
    
      (Supreme Court of Colorado,
    
      May 15, 1884.
    
    
      Error to the County Court of Arapahoe County.)
    
    Prorate in Attachment. (See opinion in Daniels v. Lewis, ante, p. 649.)
    
      France & Rogers, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. W. Cover, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam.

This case involves the same question as that considered and decided in the foregoing case of Daniels v. Lewis, viz.: whether the prorate provisions of section 116 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the distribution of the proceeds in attachment cases, are ojierative under the Code system of practice ; and for the reasons expressed in the opinion in the said case of Daniels v. Lewis, the judgment of the Court below in this case will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.  