
    CHERAW DISTRICT,
    SPRING TERM,
    1793.
    Harper v. Solomon.
    Affidavit of the absence from the State, of the subscribing witnesses to ■ a note, is inadmissible to let in other proof of the note.
    The plaintiff’s counsel offered to read, in evidence, the affidavit ©f one O’Hara, to shew that the subscribing witnesses to a note of •hand, were absent.from this State, for the purpose of letting in other evidence to prove the note. This was objected to by the dg. fend ant’s. counsel.
    .James, for plaintiff. Falconer, for defendant.
   Grimke, J.

The affidavit is inadmissible. Doug. 216.  