
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joaquin HERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-50564.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 7, 2014.
    
    Filed April 11, 2014.
    Randy K. Jones, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, Rees F. Morgan, Assistant U.S., Cob-lentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Joaquin Hernandez-Navarro appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez-Navarro’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Because Hernandez-Navarro has fully served his custqdial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised released, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     