
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse INGRAM, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-13072 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (March 7, 2018)
    Karin Bethany Hoppmann, U.S. Attorney Service—Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    
      Larry B. Henderson, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Angela Parrott, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Jesse B. Ingram, Jr., Pro Se
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Ali Kamalzadeh, appointed counsel for Jesse Ingram, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ingram’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.  