
    DUG CROSBY v. STATE.
    No. A-2730.
    Opinion Filed July 21, 1917.
    (166 Pac. 445.)
    APPEAL. AND ERROR — Affirmance. Whore the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, and no briefs are filed or argument presented, this court will make an examination of the record, and, if no fundamental error appears, the judgment will be affirmed.
    
      
      Appeal from District Court, Okmulgee County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge.
    
    Dug Crosby was convicted of the crime of burglary, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      S. P. Freéling, Atty. Gen., and R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MATSON, J.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted in the district court of Okmulgee county, charged by information with the crime of burglary in the second degree. He was-found guilty, and his punishment assessed by the jury at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of four years. From this judgment he has appealed.

No appearance was made by any one representing plaintiff in error as counsel when this case was called for oral argument; neither has any brief been filed directing the attention of the court to any supposed errors upon which the appeal was taken. This being an appeal from a conviction for a felony, we have taken the precaution to carefully examine the record, and we have discovered no errors which will warrant a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment of the district court of Okmulgee county is therefore affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.  