
    No. 244
    TYNROKA v. HAYDU
    Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist., Mahoning Co.
    Decided Oct. 24, 1924.
    829. NEGLIGENCE—Unintentional expression in charge that if the person himself contributes to his own injury, * * * the “defendant” is liable, held not misleading.
    Published only in Ohio Law Abstract
   POLLOCK, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Action for personal injuries by Haydu sustained by being knocked down by Tynroka’s automobile while Haydu was crossing intersection. The answer denies negligence on the part of Tynroka, and a plea of contributory negligence. In the court below the plaintiff recovered a judgment, and error is prosecuted on the grounds that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence and that the court erred in charging as follows: “However, if such person himself contributes to his own injury or failed to exercise ordinary care for his own safety, in that event the defendant would be liable.” The appeals court held:

Attorneys—H. T. Rapport and Wilson, Hahn, Henderson & Wilson, for Tynroka; David Shermer for Haydu; all of Youngstown.

1. That in its opinion the jury could not be misled by this expression.

2. That the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence.  