
    STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant. Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 60654, 63759.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    June 6, 1995.
    S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

Defendant appeals the denial of his Batson motion after this court remanded for a Batson hearing. State v. Seddens, 878 S.W.2d 89, 93-94 (Mo.App.1994). We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  