
    [No. 8275.]
    The People ex rel. v. The District Court of the Second District.
    Contest Over a Pdblic Office — Injunction to restrain one of the contestants from interfering with his adversary in the discharge of the office. It having been already ’determined in this court that the one so enjoined was not entitled to the office, a petition for the writ of prohibition to stay the operation of the injunction was dismissed.
    
      Petition for Writ of Prohibition.
    
    
      • Mrv John A. Ewing, Messrs. Bryant, Nye & Malburn, for petitioner. '
    Mr. John Barnett, Mr. John Campbell, Mr. Frank McLaughlin, for respondents.
    
      En banc:
    
   Per curiam.

In this case the relator seeks a writ of prohibition to stay the operation of an injunction issued from the District Court enjoining the defendant, who is the relator herein, from interfering with one Fraser in the discharge of the duties of the office of State Game and Fish Commissioner, to which office both Fraser and the relator claimed to be entitled.

Subsequent to the issue of the injunction an action in quo warranto was begun in the District Court, and on the trial thereof it was determined that the relator herein was not entitled to the office, and judgment was entered accordingly. This court in cause No. 8348, entitled Shinn v. The People, ante, 149 Pac. 623, has recently affirmed the said judgment.

It having been thus determined that the relator has no right to the writ sought, the application is denied, and the petition is dismissed.

Denied and dismissed.  