
    No. 46604.
    Protests 911050-G, etc., of A. L. Tuska Son & Co., Inc.
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of Rockingham earthenware, the same as that the subject of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.  