
    David J. PADGETT, Appellant (Respondent), v. Irene M. PADGETT, Appellee (Petitioner).
    No. Z-169.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 3, 1976.
    Conrad C. Bishop, Jr., of Weed & Bishop, Perry, for appellant.
    Edwin B. Browning, Jr., of Davis, Browning & Hardee, Madison, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs and record, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

BOYER, C. J., concurs specially.

BOYER, Chief Judge

(concurs specially).

In the light of Dinkel v. Dinkel, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1975, 322 So.2d 22, I have no alternative but to concur in affirmance. However, in my view the record clearly reveals that appellant is the better parent for the minor child whose custody is here at issue and that the child’s best interests would be served were we not prohibited by the Din-kel decision from reversing.  