
    [Crim. No. 562.
    Third Appellate District.
    May 13, 1921.]
    In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES H. BRAYNARD, etc., for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
    Habeas Corpus—Perjury—Materiality op Testimony—Suppiciency op Evidence.—Writ denied upon the authority of In re Braynard, etc., ante, p. 631.
    APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to secure release under a commitment to answer for perjury.
    Denied.
    The facts are stated in the opinion In re Braynard, etc., ante, p. 631.
    Martin I. Welsh, James T. Matlock and C. H. Braynard for Petitioner.
    
      U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, and Jesse W. Carter for Respondent.
   THE COURT.

It is conceded that the same question is involved in this application as that in In re Braynard, ante, p. 631, [199 Pac. 576], this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the prayer of the petition herein is denied and the writ discharged.  