
    18707.
    Martin v. The State.
    Decided April 10, 1928.
    
      R. A. McGraw, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. F. Hatchett, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds. The jury were authorized, under the evidence submitted to them, to find the accused guilty, and the court properly overruled the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.  