
    BURT G. TULLY v. FLOUR CITY COAL & OIL COMPANY.
    
    February 23, 1934.
    No. 29,804.
    
      Merriam & Wright, for appellant.
    
      Wellington Tully and Robert J. McDonald, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 253 N. W. 23.
    
   PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to Tully v. Flour City C. & O. Co. 191 Minn. 84, 253 N. W. 22, in which opinion is filed this day. It was a suit for personal injuries caused by the same automobile collision that gave rise to that action. Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered after denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Defendant contends that this plaintiff, who was the Avife of W. B. Tully, Avas a joint OAvner of the car in Avhich she and her husband Avere riding at the time of the accident in question and that his contributory negligence aauis imputable to her. Since Ave have held that judgment should not have been entered notAvithstanding the verdict of the jury in the husband’s case, the instant case is affirmed.  