
    GARZA v. STATE.
    (No. 5878.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 23, 1920.)
    Indictment and information &wkey;>79 — Information sufficient to charge carrying a “pistol,” though spelling it “pistle.”
    A complaint and information which charged defendant with unlawfully carrying a “pistle” will be construed as ■ charging defendant with unlawfully carrying a pistol, and the rule of bad spelling wifi apply, notwithstanding it was contended that the word “pistle” was an obsolete word meaning a letter.
    Appeal from Brazoria County Court; C. D. Jessup, Judge.
    Morris Garza was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Geo. C. Currier, of Alvin, and A. E. Master-son, of Angleton, for appellant.
    Alvin M. Owsley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   LATTIMORE,' J.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Brazoria county of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100.

The complaint and information charge appellant with" carrying a “pistle.” The testimony shows that he carried a “pistol.” Objection was made to this testimony on the ground of variance between the allegation and proof. It is urged that “pistle” is a word meaning a communication, and that the well-known rules of idem sonans and bad spelling do not apply. Appellant’s authority for asserting that “pistle” is the name of a com-: munication is the Century Dictionary. Reference thereto discloses that said work' prints said word as obsolete and quotes Mr. Chaucer, who wrote in old English some 700 years since, as using it. We do not think that the fact that an early English poet, in the exercise of his license, should have used this word in that sense, would necessarily give it any standing at this time, or would likely mislead a Brazoria county Mexican, defended by a pair of able lawyers, into" the mistake, in preparing for trial upon a charge of unlawfully carrying a “pistle,” of seriously thinking himself charged with unlawfully carrying a communication. The word “pistle” does not seem to be given in any of our other dictionaries, to which this court has access, and we are inclined to hold the word, as used in the information and complaint herein, idem sonans with “pistol,” and that the rule of bad spelling will apply and, further, that it is evident that the word “pistol” was intended. The evidence that appellant had a pistol on his person in a public place was uncontroverted.

The judgment will be affirmed. 
      <Sa»For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     