
    THOMAS v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 8, 1913.)
    1. Criminal Law (§ 1144) — Appeal—Statement op Facts — Presumption.
    Where there is no statement of facts, it is presumed that the evidence justified a conviction.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2736-2781, 2901, 3016-3037; Dec. Dig. § 1144.]
    2. Criminal Law (§ 1144) —Appeal — Pre-' sumptions.
    Where there is no bill of exceptions, it is presumed that the rulings of the court were correct.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2736-2781, 2901, 3016-3037; Dec. Dig. § 1144.]
    Appeal from Dallas County Court at Law; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge.
    W. H. S. Thomas was convicted of being a vagrant, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted under a complaint properly charging him with being a vagrant.

There is no statement of facts accompanying the record, and under such circumstances we must presume that the evidence justified the conviction. There are no bills of exception, consequently we presume the rulings of the court were correct; and, as the court submitted the offense charged, the judgment is affirmed.  