
    Crosthwait v. James et al., and vice versa.
    
    Atkinson, J. — Where suit is brought against partners in their firm name, and personal service is had upon each, and a verdict is rendered against the partnership, and the members of the firm make a motion for a new trial, which is granted, upon writ of error to this court each member of the firm is a necessary party defendant in error, and a failure to serve one of them with a copy of the bill of exceptions is cause for dismissing the writ of error.
    November 26, 1894.
    R. J. Jordan, for plaintiff.
    Hillyer, Alexander & Lambdin, for defendants.
   Writ of error dismissed.  