
    In the Matter of Shahid U. Kahn, Appellant, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Irvington et al., Respondents.
    [599 NYS2d 975]
   —In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Irvington dated August 15, 1989, which, inter alia, denied the petitioner’s application for an area variance, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cow-hey, J.), entered April 16, 1991, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the determination is annulled, and the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Irvington is directed to grant the application and to issue to the petitioner’s application for the area variance in question.

The evidence presented demonstrates that the petitioner’s parcel was a buildable lot held in single and separate ownership which fully conformed with the zoning ordinance at the time the amendments were passed which rendered it nonconforming. Therefore, the petitioner has a vested right to use the now substandard parcel for residential purposes. Any consideration by the Zoning Board of Appeals of self-created hardship or economic injury was improper, and the Board’s denial of an area variance on these grounds was arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Pateman v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 191 AD2d 568). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.  