
    NATIONAL FIRE PROOFING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KATE A. MIAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 15, 1913
    Decided March 16, 1914.
    On appeal from the Hudson County Circuit-Court.
    Eor the plaintiff-respondent, Rudolph Schroeder and John D. Pierson,
    
    Eor the defendant-appellant, Samuel A. Besson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for . the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in tile case of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

For affirmance — Tite Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsch, Bogert, Yredenbuegi-i, Congdon, Teri-iunE, Heppeni-ieimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.  