
    Mike Turkovic v. Pittsburgh Crucible Steel Company, Appellant.
    Argued April 17, 1918.
    April 21, 1919:
    Appeal, No. 127, April T., 1918, by defendant, from order of C. P. Beaver Co., December T., 1917, No. 62, dismissing appeal from decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board allowing claim in the case of Mike Turkovic v. Pittsburgh Crucible Steel Company.
    Before Qrladv, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Head, Kephart, Trexler and Williams, JJ.
    Affirmed.
    Appeal from Workmen’s Compensation Board.
    
      Error assigned was, among others, order of the court dismissing the appeal.
    
      George Q.Bradshaw, and with him Alexander P. Lindsay and John G. Sheriff, for appellant.
    
      Clyde Holt, of Holt, Holt & Richardson, for appellee.
   Opinion bt

Porter, J.,

The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant company and suffered an injury to his left hand in the course of Ms employment. The referee and the Workmen’s Compensation Board allowed Mm compensation as for the loss of the use of. a hand. The court below upon appeal affirmed that finding and from that action of the court we have this appeal. The question here presented does not in any essential particular differ from that which we have considered in the case of Chovic versus the same defendant, in which an opinion has this day been filed; it would serve no useful purpose to go over the same ground again.

The appeal is dismissed at appellant’s costs.  