
    SEELEY against NORRIS.
    ON CERTIORARI.
    Judgment below w¿s obtained October 10, 1807, by confession, for retailing spirituous liquors without license, $100. No state .of demand had been filed; no process issued; no specific charges made or found, whether one penalty, or twenty, or none; the time of commencement of action was nowhere mentioned; but near two years after this confession of judgment, execution was issued without a scire faaias, or other proceedings to revive the judgment.
   By the Court.

The issuing execution was unquestionably erroneous; but the whole proceedings are too loose to support the judgment below.

Judgment reversed.

Cited in Krumcick v. Krumcick, 2 Gr. 39.  