
    Thomas W. Stack, Appellant, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent.
    (City Court of Brooklyn — General Term,
    June, 1894.)
    The compensation of policemen in the city of Brooklyn is still regulated by the revised charter of 1888, although the population now exceeds 800,000, and not by chapter 182, Laws of 1884, relating to the salaries of policemen in cities having a population exceeding that number. Chapter 348, Laws of 1887, although in terms a general act applicable to all cities of a certain population, is a local and special act applicable only to the city of Brooklyn, and its re-enactment as section 5 of the charter of 1888 was intended to be a complete provision on the subject till further legislative action.
    Appeal from judgment dismissing the complaint.
    Action to recover an alleged balance of salary claimed to be due to the plaintiff. Plaintiff was paid by the city in accordance with the rates fixed by the board of estimate in pursuance of section 5 of the revised charter, but claims that he is entitled to be paid at the rate fixed by chapter 182 of the Laws of 1884, on the ground that, the census showing that the population now exceeds 800,000, the compensation is governed by that act.
    
      John A. Quintard, for appellant.
    
      Almet F. Jenks, for respondent.
   Van Wyck, J.

If the revised charter of Brooklyn (Laws 1888, chap. 583, tit. 11, § 5) was not superseded by chapter 182 of the Laws of 1884 when the census showed Brooklyn to be a city of over' 800,000 inhabitants, then the judgment appealed from must be affirmed. Section 5 of this charter grades the patrolmen of the police force of this city, according to their term of service, as follows: Those having served over three years shall be members of the first grade ; those under three years and over one year shall be members of the second grade, and those under one year shall be members of the third grade; and authorizes the board of estimate of the dty of Brooklyn to fix their annual salaries at a sum not to exceed $1,200 for the first grade, $1,100 for the second grade and $1,000 for the third grade. The board of estimate has fixed their annual salaries at $1,100, $900 and $800 for the first, second and third grade respectively. The law of 1884 (Chap. 182) grades the police force in the same manner, and fixes the salary for each grade at the maximum sum to which section 5 of the revised charter authorizes the Brooklyn board of estimate to raise the salaries of policemen. The act of 1884, according to its title, purports “to regulate the grade and to fix the * * * compensation of members of the police force * * * in all cities of this state having, according to the last census, a population exceeding eight hundred thousand.” The appellant insists that when the census showed the population of Brooklyn to exceed 800,000 the charter provision became inoperative, and that this act of 1884 controlled and at once operated to raise the salaries of the police according to its terms. There is no serious contention that if this charter provision, which is a special and local law, had heen adopted as an. independent act, and not as a part of the revised charter, which is entitled “ An act to revise and combine in a single act all existing special and local laws affecting * * * the city of Brooklyn,” that it would operate as a repeal of the law of 1884, so far as it affected this city; but it is urged that this charter provision is the incorporation in this charter of chapter 348 of the Laws of 1887, and that this latter act is a general law, intended to apply not only to Brooklyn, but to other cities of over 500,000 and under 800,000 population. It is plain that this charter provision was-taken from the law of 1887, which provides, firstly, that in cities having, according to the last census, over 500,000 and less than 800,000 population, the police force shall be divided into the three grades already mentioned, and then follows the only provision therein relating to compensation, which is quoted here at length : “ The annual pay or compensation of the members of the police force shall be fixed by the majority of all the members of the board of estimate of the city of Brooklyn, and shall not be * * * greater than the following, namely : For patrolmen of the first grade * * * not to exceed twelve hundred dollars per annum each; for patrolmen of the second grade, at a rate not to exceed eleven hundred dollars per annum each; for patrolmen of the third grade, at a rate not to exceed one thousand dollars per annum each; for * * * doormen, * * * at a rate not to exceed nine hundred dollars per annum each.” It is true that this act, in some of its terms, purports to be a general act applicable to all cities of a certain population, but the context clearly shows it to be a special and local one, affecting only the city of Brooklyn. The clause quoted in relation to the compensation, which, by its terms, expressly applies to Brooklyn,, and cannot apply to any other city, is the very substance of this act, and clearly excludes any legislative intent that the act should apply to any other city. The grading of the police was. a simple incident or basis which was necessary to give force-to-the salary clause that applies only to Brooklyn. The act cannot have any real application to other cities without further legislative action in reference to the compensation of their respective police forces. If the act of 1887 was denuded of the compensation clause relating to this city only, it would become a lifeless skeleton of fleshless and marrowless bones and powerless to help or harm any one. That this is a local and special act, and was so intended to be, cannot be escaped, unless the vital part of its context must yield to an incident thereto which happened to be couched in terms of a general law. The incorporation of this law in the charter of 1888, <f An act to revise and combine in a single act all existing special and local laws affecting * * * the city of Brooklyn,” was an expressed declaration of the legislative intent that it was not a general law.

The law of 1887, re-enacted in section 5 of the charter of 1888, was intended to be a complete provision on the subject, so far as Brooklyn was concerned, till further legislative action. It is well settled'that, in a conflict between the provisions of a general law and those of a special and local law, the nullification by the former of the latter, so far as the special location is concerned, is not favored, and will not be implied without the legislative intent so to do is apparent and clear. McKenna v. Edmonstone, 91 N. Y. 231; Whipple v. Christian, 80 id. 523; Van Denburgh v. Greenbush, 66 id. 1; People ex rel. State v. Quigg, 59 id. 88; Endlich Stat. §§ 223, 228.

Our conclusion that the compensation of the patrolmen is still regulated by the revised charter renders it unnecessary to consider the contention of the respondent that the words “ according to the last census ” in the law of 1881, chapter 182, limited its application to cities having such population according to the census of 1880.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Osborne, J., concurs.

Judgment'affirmed, with costs.  