
    Thomas COLLINS, Employee/Respondent, v. MISSOURI RECYCLING COMPANY, Employer/Appellant.
    No. 61589.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 18, 1992.
    Gary T. Soule, Carl J. Lumley, Curtis, Oetting, Heinz, Garrett & Soule, P.C., Clayton, for employer/appellant.
    Harry J. Nichols, St. Louis, for employee/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from an award to claimant by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  