
    HILL v. RIDDLE.
    No. 2141.
    Opinion Filed November 19, 1912.
    (128 Pac. 112.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error bas filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 OMa. viii, 95 Pae. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
    (Syllabus by Robertson, C.)
    
      Error from Pontotoc County Court; W. G. Currie, Special Judge.
    
    
      Action by W. R. Riddle against W. W. Hill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
    Dismissed.
    
      Crawford & Bolen, for plaintiff in error.
   Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court November 22, 1910. No brief has been filed by either-party, and it is evident that the appeal has been abandoned. The petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  