
    WALLINGFORD v. WOOD et al.
    
    No. 3474.
    Opinion Filed February 28, 1914.
    (139 Pac. 252.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Olcla. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
    (Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)
    
      Error from Superior Court, Custer County; I. W. Lazvter, Judge.
    
    Action in replevin by Lydia L. Wallingford against C. B. Wood and the Bonebrake-Lacy Hardware Company. Judgment for the defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
    Dismissed.
    M. L. Holcombe, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Shull & McKnight, for defendants in error.
   Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have the)'- offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want, of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 136 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 135 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 137 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 836, 137 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  