
    16459.
    Sellman et al. v. The State.
    Decided July 14, 1925.
    Larceny of automobile; from Eulton superior court—Judge E. D. Thomas. March 30, 1925.
   Luke, J.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted of the oifense of simple larceny. The evidence did not authorize the conviction of the defendants upon the indictment. Eor this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Broyles, O. J., dissents.

Scott, Hornbuclcle & Moore, for plaintiffs in error.

John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, 1L A. Stephens, Ralph H. Pharr, contra.  