
    In re Inez LAYRISSON.
    No. CA 89 0964.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
    Feb. 22, 1990.
    Writ Denied April 27, 1990.
    H. Alston Johnson, III, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant Colonial Penn Ins. Co.
    Jeffrey L. Little, J. Patrick Hennessy, Shreveport, for Kenneth Polk, Kandi Polk, Gary Stall, Sr. as Administrator of Christopher Stall, Kay Stall and Gary Stall and Catherine Oustalet.
    Carl W. Cleveland, Dawn Barrios, New Orleans, for Inez Layrisson.
    Darleen M. Jacobs, New Orleans, for Edward Zerique.
    Ray S. Clement, Jr., New Orleans, for Reliance Ins. Co. and Planet Ins. Co.
    Andrew A. Lemeshewsky, Jr., New Orleans, for Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.
    Paul H. Due, Baton Rouge, for Sammy J. Parrino as Administrator of Tiffany Parri-no and Tena Marie G. Parrino.
    
      Martin A. Smith, Jr., Slidell, for Robert J. Allison and Betty F. Allison.
    Kathy C. Alford, Mandeville, for Michael Greco.
    Jack M. Capella, New Orleans, for Thomas Mackie.
    Stewart F. Lunn, Donald L. Brice, Jr., Shreveport, for Anna Wilson Sharp, formerly Anna Wilson.
    Stephen L. Hubert, Metairie, for Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
    Bruce Simpson, Kentwood, for Donnie Newman.
    Karen Lewis, Craig R. Nelson, New Orleans, for Colonial Penn Ins. Co.
    Michael Sistrunk, New Orleans, for City of Ponchatoula.
    Charles A. Yerderame, New Orleans, for Joyce Meyer.
    Gary Bizal, New Orleans, for John Gui-dry and Sandra Simmons.
    Burt Carnahan, Metairie, for State Farm.
    Tom Matheny, Hammond, for State of La., Dept, of Public Safety & Corrections.
    Joseph Rausch, Metairie, for Tangipahoa Sheriff’s Office.
    Ronnie G. Penton, Bogaluso.
    Hobart 0. Pardue, Richard Holley, Springfield, for Timothy Hodges, Darlene Stewart, Patricia Pickering, Marquis Woo-dale, Harrell Bankston, and Joe Green.
   REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND ORAL ARGUMENT DENIED.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the trial court signed on December 10, 1987, was a final judgment. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1841. A judgment, like a pleading, is governed by its substance rather than its caption. Cf. Acadiana Bank v. Hayes, 498 So.2d 275 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986); Bryant v. Middlebrooks, 486 So.2d 188 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986). Notice of the signing of the final judgment is required when the trial court takes the matter under advisement, as it did in the present case. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1918. Appellant admits receiving a copy of the letter from the deputy clerk of court to the attorney who represented it at that time, advising counsel of the rendition of the judgment signed on December 1, 1987, and stating that a copy of that order was enclosed. The letter constitutes a sufficient notice of judgment, and in this case, it also satisfies the certification requirement of Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1913. See Great American Insurance Companies v. East, 264 So.2d 761 (La.App. 1st Cir.1972); cf. Boyle v. Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury, 457 So.2d 1276 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984).

The case of Roy Fink, Inc. v. State, D.O.T.D., 464 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985), writ denied, 467 So.2d 539 and 541 (La.1985), is easily distinguishable from the present case. In Roy Fink, Inc., supra, appellants contended they had not received notice of judgment, and the record did not clearly show that notice had been sent to the parties. In the present case, appellant admits it received the letter notifying it of the signing of the order on December 10, 1987, which dismissed the concursus. If we were to consider appellant’s suspensive appeal filed on May 1, 1989, as having been taken from the December 10, 1987, judgment, the appeal clearly would be untimely.  