
    T. L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Felicia Williams TRAXLER et al., Appellees.
    Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.
    July 13, 1956.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1956.
    Claude Pepper Law Offices and John M. McCants, Mitchell & Mitchell and Harry H. Mitchell, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Jenkins & Jenkins and Clara Floyd Ge-han, Gainesville, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38, 31 F. S.A., of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and'seaso'nably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

. It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed thqt the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J.,’. and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ„ concur.  