
    Small v. Small.
    Argued November 14,
    Decided December 21, 1905.
    Appeal. Before Judge Cann. Chatham superior court. March term, 1905.
    
      George Gordon and Edmund II. Abrahams, for plaintiff in error. W. B. Stubbs, contra.
   OandleR, J.

In the argument before this court only the general grounds of the motion for a new trial, that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, were insisted upon. The evidence, while conflicting, warranted the verdict; and the judgment overruling the motion will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.  