
    14775.
    Bailey v. Gardner.
    Decided December 5, 1923.
   Luke, J.

1. The evidence was conflicting, and the judgment will not be reversed upon the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of alleged errors in the introduction of evidence, in the court’s charge, and of the failure to- charge, contain no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Action for damages; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. May 12, 1923.

Albert Kemper, A. L. Henson, for plaintiff.

J. G. B. Brwin, for defendant.  