
    Nancy Brady v. The Steamer Armada Burns et al.
    Jurisdiction — Action for Trespass by Master of a Steamer.
    An action of trepass nlay be maintained against the master of a steamer, for wrongs committed, though no action therefor could be maintained against the boat except in the Admirality Courts of the United States.
    APPEAX EROM UNION CIRCUIT COURT.
    September 15, 1868.
    
      Huston, for appellant.
    
    
      Spalding, McBlroy, Bush, for appellee.
    
   Opinion oe the Court

Judge Wixxiams:

The petition is against the steamer Armada Ann Burns and J. V. Throop as master, and as to the boat and her owners it is a proceeding in rem for a massive tort. "Who the owners, or what their names, are not designated in the caption nor the petition, nor is there any process against them as individuals.

As to the boat and her owners the case comes clearly within the principles announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Hines vs. Treno, 4 Wallace, 355, and as decided by this court in Stuart vs. Hany, 3 Bush. And belongs exclusively to admiralty jurisdiction, and the demurrer was properly sustained.

But as to Throop the petition sets out a case of trespass clearly remedial by the common law and therefore is not a mere marine tort to be remedied by a proceeding in rem in the admiralty courts of the United States, but is one for which he may be held personally responsible by suit in any court having common law jurisdiction.

It is true that slavery was not recognized by the common law, yet slaves being personal property by the positive law of Kentucky any violation of the owners’ legal rights thereto, within her jurisdiction may be redressed by common law remedies as has often been held in the courts of this and other states.

Wherefore, the judgment sustaining the demurrer as to the “Armada Aim Burns” is affirmed. But as to J. Y. Throop it is reversed with directions to over-rule it is to him and for further proceedings as herein indicated.  