
    In re AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.520.
    No. SC14-721.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 2, 2015.
    Murray Bruce Silverstein, Chair, Rules of Judicial Administration Committee, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, FL, Judge Jon Berkley Morgan, Past Chair, Rules of Judicial Administration Committee, Kissimmee, Florida, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Krys Godwin, Bar Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
   REVISED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the order entered in this case on April 2, 2015, the opinion dated November 26, 2014, is withdrawn and the following revised opinion is substituted in its place.

We have for consideration an out-of-cycle report proposing amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.520 (Documents) filed by The Florida Bar’s Rules of Judicial Administration Committee (Committee). See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(e). We have jurisdiction and adopt the amendments as proposed.

BACKGROUND

According to the Committee’s report, the more significant amendments address format requirements for paper documents filed with the court and the use of margins by the clerks of court, which are issues of great concern to the clerks. The proposed amendments were approved by the Committee by a vote of 36-1 and were unanimously approved by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar. The Committee did not publish the proposals before filing them with the Court. The Court published the proposals for comment after they were filed. But, no comments were filed.

AMENDMENTS

The more significant amendments are to subdivisions (b) (Type and Size) and (d) (Recording Space) of the rule. In order to make it easier for clerks to scan paper documents, subdivision (b) is amended, as proposed,- to require paper documents filed with the court to be legibly typewritten or printed, on only one side of letter-sized white recycled paper with one-inch margins and consecutively numbered pages. Subdivision (b) also is amended, as proposed, to clarify that all documents electronically filed must be filed in a format capable of being electronically searched consistent with state and federal accessibility requirements. Subdivision (d) (Recording Space) is amended, as proposed, to add a one-inch margin requirement and format, location, and font-size requirements for the date and time stamp on electronically filed documents. New subdivision (d)(2)(C), as proposed in the Committee’s motion for reconsideration, provides a procedure for docketing paper filings, which clerks of court continue to receive, especially from self-represented parties, as authorized by rule 2.525(d).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. New subdivision (d)(2)(C) shall become effective immediately upon the release of this revised opinion. The remainder of the amendments shall become effective nunc pro tunc January 1, 2015, at 12:01 a.m. to the extent they apply to electronic filings. The Court recognizes that clerks of court may have had to vary from the requirements of those amendments when docketing paper filings after January 1, 2015. Therefore, as clarified with the addition of new subdivision (d)(2)(C), the remainder of the amendments shall become effective as they apply to paper filings immediately upon the release of this revised opinion.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 2.520. DOCUMENTS

(a) Electronic Filing Mandatory: A1 documents filed in any court shall be filed by electronic transmission in accordance with rule 2.525. “Documents” means pleadings, motions, petitions, memoranda, briefs, notices, exhibits, declarations, affidavits, orders, judgments, decrees, writs, opinions, and any other paper or writing submitted to a court.

(b) Type and Size. Documents subject to the exceptions set forth in rule 2.525(d) shall be legibly typewritten or printed, on only one side of letter sized (8 1/2 by 11 inch) white recycled paper with one inch margins and consecutively numbered pages filed on recycled paper measuring 8½-⅛-1-1-⅛<⅛0⅜. For purposes of this rule, paper is recycled if it contains a minimum content of 50 percent waste paper. Xerographic rReduction of legal-size (8 1/2 by 14 inches) documents to letter size (8 1/2 by 11 inches) is prohibited. A1 other documents filed by electronic transmission shall comply with rule 2.526 and be filed in a format capable of being electronically searched and printed in a format consistent with the provisions of this rule.

(c) Exhibits. Any exhibit or attachment filed-with pleadings or papersto any document may be filed in its original size.

(d) Recording Space and Space for Date and Time Stamps.

(1) On all papers and documents prepared and filed by the court or by any party to a proceeding which are to be recorded in the public records of any county, including but not limited to final money judgments and notices of lis pendens, a 3-inch by 3-inch space at the top right-hand corner on the first page and a 1-inch by 3-inch space at the top right-hand corner on each subsequent page shall be left blank and reserved for use by the clerk of court.

(2) On all documents filed with the court, a 1-inch margin on all sides must be left blank for date and time stamps.

(A) Format. Date and time stamp formats must include a single line detailing the name of the court or Portal and shall not include clerk seals. Date stamps must be 8 numerical digits separated by slashes with 2 digits for the month, 2 digits for the day, and 4 digits for the year. Time stamps must be formatted in 12 hour time frames with a.m. or p.m. included. The font size and type must meet the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements.

(B) Location. The Portal stamp shall be on the top left of the document. The Florida Supreme Court and district courts of appeal stamps shall be on the left margin horizontally. Any administrative agency stamp shall be on the right margin horizontally. The clerk’s stamp for circuit and county courts shall be on the bottom of the document.

(C) Paper Filings. When a document is filed in paper as authorized by rule, the clerk may stamp the paper document in ink with the date and time of filing instead of, or in addition to, placing the electronic stamp as described in subdivision (B). The ink stamp on a paper document must be legible on the electronic version of the document, and must neither obscure the content or other date stamp, nor occupy space otherwise reserved by subdivision (B).

(e) Exceptions to Recording Space. Any papers or documents created by persons or entities over which the filing party has no control, including but not limited to wills, codicils, trusts, or other testamentary documents; documents prepared or executed by any public officer; documents prepared, executed, acknowledged, or proved outside of the State of Florida; or documents created by State or Federal government agencies, may be filed without the space required by this rule.

(f) Noncompliance. No clerk of court shall refuse-for filingto file any document or-paper- because of noncompliance with this rule. However, upon request of the clerk of court, noncomplying documents shall be resubmitted in accordance with this rule.

Court Commentary

[No Change] 
      
      .We issue the revised opinion in response to a “Motion for Reconsideration” filed by the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee asking the Court to add new subdivision (d)(2)(C) (Paper Filings) to rule 2.520 to clarify the implementation of the amendments to the rule adopted in the November 26, 2014, opinion, with respect to paper filings and to make several technical corrections to the amendments to subdivision (d)(2)(A) (Format). In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of Jud. Admin. 2.520, No. SC14-721 (motion filed Feb. 27, 2015).
     
      
      . See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
     
      
      . The Committee approved proposed new subdivision (d)(2)(C) by a vote of 31-0 and the Board of Governors Executive Committee unanimously approved the proposal.
     