
    Thomas Looby vs. Edward E. Davidson et al.
    
    Argued April 14, 1892.
    Decided May 5, 1892.
    Appeal by defendant Edward E. Davidson from a judgment of the District Court of Ramsey county, Sgan, J., entered January 4, 1892.
    This case involved the same questions as the previous one of Ness v. Da-vidso'n, ante, p. 469. Thomas Looby did the brick work on the alterations of the Exposition Rink building. His bill was $3,180, on which he was paid $1,367.51, and he made and filed a lien'statement for the balance. He brought this action. A supplemental complaint was allowed and tiled, and the case tried, and judgment entered as in the Hess Case.
    
      Williams, Qoodenow & Stanton and Slier & How, for appellant.
    
      Lawler, Durment & Bigelow, for respondent.
    (Opinion published 52 N. W. Rep. 48.)
   Per Curiam,

The decision in this, case is controlled by that in Ness v. Davidson, ante, 469, (52 N. W. Rep. 46.) Judgment affirmed.  