
    James Hamilton DOWLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.
    Sept. 23, 1955.
    James H. Dowling, 'in pro. per., for appellant.
    Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing to'the'court from an examination of the record that ‘¿aid motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and THORN AL, JJ., concur.  