
    In the Matter of Pritpal Kainth, Appellant, v Inder Kainth, Respondent.
    Submitted April 2, 2007;
    decided June 7, 2007
   Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).  