
    George MITCHELL, respondent, v. Gabriel SALANT, appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 14, 1916.)
    Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the sole ground of the erroneous proceeding by plaintiff’s trial counsel in asking a prospective juror a question based upon the stated contingency “if it should transpire that an Insurance company was interested in the case.”
   Jenks, P. J., and Thomas, Carr, Stapleton, and Mills, JJ., concur.  