
    Mary E. Jackson, Plaintiff, v. Charles C. Bradhurst et al., Defendants.
    (Supreme Court, New York Special Term,
    February, 1896.)
    1. Partition — Lien of creditor of party — Release of purchaser.
    Where a sale is had in an action for partition a lien acquired by a creditor of one of the parties attaches to the whole premises and constitutes a cloud on the title thereto which will authorize the release of the purchaser.
    2, Same — Code Civ, Pro., § 1540,
    Section 1540 of the Code does not apply where there has been a sale on partition.
    Motion by the purchaser at a sale in partition to be relieved from his purchase.
    Hays & Greenbaum, for motion.
    Charles A. Jackson, for plaintiff.
    William J. O’Leary, for defendants.
   Truax, J.

On the 17th day of February, 1892, prior to the filing of the Us pendetls in this action, which is an action of partition, a Us pendens was filed in an action brought by one Mary E. Smith against the above-named Charles 0. Bradhurst, in an action to enforce the specific performance of a certain contract, by which the said Charles 0. Bradhurst agreed to give a mortgage upon his interest in certain premises which were afterward sought to be partitioned in this action. The above-named Mary E. Smith was not made a party to this action. There was no advertisement in this action for liens upon the undivided shares of the various parties, and the lis pendens in the action of Smith against Bradhurst is still upon the interest of the said Bradhurst. Certain premises were sold under the decree in this action and purchased by the moving party, who now seeks to have said purchase set aside, upon the ground that the lis pendens filed in the action of Smith against Bradhurst is a cloud upon the title to said premises. Section 1540 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that “ The plaintiff may, at his election, make a creditor, having a lien on an undivided share or interest in the property, a defendant in the action. In that case he must set forth the nature of the lien, and specify the share or interest to which it attaches.' ■ If partition of the property is made, the lien, whether '■ the creditor is or is not made a party, shall thereafter attach only . to the share.or interest assigned to the party upon whose share ■ or1 interest the lien attached, which must he first charged with its just proportion of the costs’ and expenses of the action in preference, to the lien.” .This section of the Code was • intended to apply only to a case where.an actual partition is made, and not ' to a case where a sale is made. The sections of the Code relating "to partition make a difference between an actual partition and a sale. For instance,", by section 1.532, which is the first section of the article of the Code relating to actions for partition, it is provided that two. or more persons holding as joint 'tenants .or tenants" in common may maintain an action for partition according to the respective rights of the persons interested and for the sale thereof if it appears that partition cannot be made. From this section it appears that a sale is only to be made in case an actual partition cannot he made. Section 1540 does not apply to the case of a sale because it does not use the.word “ sale,”’nor does the.language that the liens shall attach only to the share or interest assigned ” contemplate the case of. a sale and distribution of the proceeds. The share is only assigned to the party where actual ' partition is made. In other cases, there «is a distribution of the proceeds. Motion granted;

Motion granted.  