
    AMPERSE vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne),
    14 M., 33.
   To compel entry of an order specifying that relator was entitled to double costs.

Denied November 11, 1865.

Held, that under Comp. Laws, Sec. 3736, relator, as plaintiff was entitled to double costs, and no such order was necessary to perfect his right; that plaintiff should have appealed from the the decision of the taxing officer to the Circuit Court, and from, the decision of that court, if adverse, to this court by writ of error.  