
    The Indiana Central Railway Company v. Atkinson.
    
      Monday, May 28.
    A railroad act provided for an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, on an assessment of damages for land taken, &c., “as in other cases.” Held, that by reducing the plaintiff's judgment five dollars or more on the appeal, the appellant was entitled to costs.
    ERROR to the Hancock Circuit Court.
   Perkins, J.

George Y. Atkinson made the following claim to damages, before John Rardin, a justice of the peace of Hancock county, against the Indicma Central Railway Company.

« The complainant makes and files his statement of damages as follows, to wit: George Y. Atkinson claims of the Indiana Central Railway Company for right of way through the west half of the north-east quarter of section two, in township fifteen north, of range seven east, also the east half of the north-west quarter of section two, in township fifteen north, of range seven east, situate in the county of Hancock, and state of Indiana, the following damages, to-wit:

For four and a quarter acres of cleared land, at 50 dollars per acre,................. $212 50

For two acres of corn and a quarter of an acre of wheat,............................. 18 00

For moving 120 rods of fence,............. 15 00

For making and building 80 rods of new fence, and keeping it up for all time to come,..... 100 00

For cutting off from stock water 23 acres of cleared land, ........................... 50 00

For cars frightening my horses while cultivating five fields that will border on the road, 50 00

Total damage, ..........................$445 50

Cr. : For supposed benefits that may or might accrue to me if the railway should, in course of time, be completed,.................. 100 00

Balance claimed from company,.......... $345 50 ”

The parties appeared before the justice, agreed upon three men as appraisers, who examined the premises, &c., and awarded Atkinson 150 dollars, for which sum the justice rendered judgment, Time 21, 1851. The company appealed to the Circuit Court, where there was a jury trial, resulting in a verdict and judgment for Atkinson, the plaintiff, of 60 dollars. • The defendant thereupon moved the Court to tax the costs of the cause against the plaintiff; the Court denied the motion; and the defendant excepted. The correctness of the ruling upon this motion is the only point presented by counsel in their briefs. We examine it.

In January, 1847, the charter of the Terre-Haute and Richmond Railroad Company was granted, the fifteenth section of which provided for the assessment of damages for land taken, &c., before a ■justice of the peace, on the „ i . , . , i r t report of twelve men, instead ot three, and authorized an appeal to the Circuit Court “ as in other cases,” where a re-assessment of damages, on the report of viewers, &e., might be had, and made the judginent of the Court.

D. S. Gooding, T. A. Hendricks and C. H. Test, for the plaintiffs.

T. D. Walpole, for the defendant.

In 1851, the portion of the road contemplated by the above company, extending from Indianapolis to the Ohio state line, was placed under the authority of a separate corporation called the Indiana Central Railway Company, to which was given all the general powers, rights, &c., of the Terre-Haute and Richmond Railroad Company.

The appeals, then, from these assessments of damages before justices of the peace, being like “ as in other cases,” we must look to the general practice for the rules governing them. According to those rules, where, on an appeal from the judgment before the justice to the Circuit Court, the judgment for the plaintiff is reduced 5 dollars or more, the defendant recovers costs. Such being the practice, the defendant should have recovered costs in this case, as the judgment for the plaintiff before the justice was reduced in the Circuit Court in a greater amount than 5 dollars.

The practice, in the case, it will be observed, did not, in regard to the persons assessing the amount of damages before the magistrate, correspond with the statute, but no objection was taken by either party.

The case is argued in this Court upon the question of costs alone, and we decide no other.

The right of appeal to this Court in this class of cases has been settled heretofore. 3 Ind. 253.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, except as to the costs, which the Circuit Court is directed to award against Atkinson.  