
    O’NEILL, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK PRESS CO., Limited, Defendant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    May 3, 1898.)
    Action by William Lane O’Neill against le New York Press Company, Limited.
   [PER CURIAM.

We are of opinion that our Irection made on the former application to dismiss appeal was erroneous; that the papers tinted by the appellant were all that, under the ecitals in the order, it was requisite for him to tint. Motion denied. Order hitherto made valí ted, and hearing of appeal set down perempIrily for Thursday next.  