
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio Corrales POMPA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-50582.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00003-RT-1.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Oct. 14, 2008.
    
    Decided Oct. 28, 2003.
    Before WARDLAW, BERZON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Sergio Corrales Pompa appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 123-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Pompa has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Pompa has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     