
    SUPREME COURT, ONEIDA SPECIAL TERM,
    SEPTEMBER, 1899.
    George H. Coonrad, Plaintiff, v. Marcella Marriott et al., Defendants.
    Action to compel specific performance of contract for sale of certain premises made by defendant Marriott with plaintiff.
    H. S. Willison andD. F. Searle, for plaintiff.
    J. S. Baker, for defendants.
   Hiscook, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without costs on the ground that the contract of sale given by defendant Marriott to the plaintiff Coonrad was not of such a fair, just and equitable character as will be specifically enforced by a court of equity. Seymour v. Delancey, 6 Johns. Ch. 222; Margraf v. Muir, 57 N. Y. 158; Sherman v. Wright, 49 id. 227.

Complaint dismissed, without costs.  