
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgardo Castillo JIUILLEN, a.k.a. Edgardo Castillo, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10173.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Dec. 12, 2003.
    Carin Duryee, USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Mathew McGuire, Patagonia, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Edgardo Castillo Jiuillen appeals the judgment imposing a 41-month sentence pursuant to his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Castillo Jiuillen has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Castillo Jiuillen has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     