
    Alvin S. Gaskill, Sr., respondent, v. Daisy Clarke, appellant.
    [Submitted October term, 1947.
    Decided January 29th, 1948.]
    
      Messrs. Lloyd, Horn & Perskie (Mr. John Lloyd, Jr.), for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Kirkman, Mulligan <&■ Harris, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This was a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land.

A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree entered in the Court of Chancery should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Bueling, Wells, Dill, Feeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.  