
    Thomas R. Franklin et al. v. City of Houston.
    Decided January 17, 1900.
    Default—Amendment—New Cause of Action.
    An amendment in a suit by a city to recover taxes and foreclose its lien therefor, which sought to recover other taxes, for other years, and to foreclose on other lots than those mentioned in the original petition, introduced a new cause of action, on which judgment could not be taken by default, where defendant, who was cited to answer the original petition, had not appeared or answered.
    Error to Harris. Tried below before Hon. War. H. Wilson.
    TF. J. Howard, for plaintiffs in error.
    No briefs for appellee were on file.
   KEY, Associate Justice.

—The city of Houston brought this action to recover a given sum alleged to be due it for taxes for the year 1895 upon certain lots in said city, and to foreclose a lien upon said lots. Citation was issued upon the original petition, and served upon the defendants. Thereafter the plaintiff filed an amended original petition, seeking, in addition to the recovery sought in the original petition, to recover for taxes alleged to be due upon other lots, and for several other years, and to foreclose a lien upon all the lots for a sum much larger than was sued for in the original petition. Ho citation was issued upon the amended petition, and the defendants filed no answer. A judgment hv default was rendered, awarding the plaintiff all the relief sought in the amended petition; and the defendants have brought the case to this -court by writ of error.

The amended petition set up a new cause of action, and as the defendants were not cited to answer thereto, it wras error to render judgment by default thereon; and for this error the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.  