
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaquentez MYERS, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-11103 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed April 28, 2017
    Leigha Amy Simonton, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jaquentez Myers appeals the sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. He contends that the district court committed plain error by increasing his sentence based on two prior Texas convictions for burglary of a habitation that were deemed “crimes of violence” under the applicable 2014 edition of the United States Sentencing Guidelines.

Myers contends that Texas definition of burglary of a habitation is broader than the generic definition of burglary of a dwelling, and that the court could not use the modified categorical approach because the statute is not divisible. The Texas statute is divisible. See United States v. Uribe, 838 F.3d 667, 670-71 (5th Cir. 2016) (addressing the effect of Mathis v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1359, 197 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017). The relevant court documents, properly consulted under the modified categorical approach, show that Myers was convicted of violating Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1), which matches sufficiently the generic definition of burglary of a dwelling. See United States v. Conde-Castaneda, 753 F.3d 172, 175-79 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     