
    Narinder Pal SINGH, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-74925.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 20, 2008.
    
    Filed May 22, 2008.
    Inna Lipkin, Esq., Law Offices of Inna Lipkin, Redwood City, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Anthony V. Teelucksingh, U.S. Dept of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    
      Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Narinder Pal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration’s (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s order denying asylum. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the determination that Singh’s asylum application was untimely because that determination turns on a disputed question of fact. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Singh’s contentions regarding changed circumstances, extraordinary circumstances, and alleged due process violations by the IJ because Singh failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     