
    (C.D. 4323)
    Parksmith Corporation v. United States
    (Dated January 10, 1972)
    
      Sérico £ Slclaroff (Joel K. Simon of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      L. Patrióle Gray, III, Assistant Attorney General (Joseph I. Lrietmian, trial attorney), for the defendant.
   Richardson, Judge:

Defendant moves under Rule 10.3(a) for an order consolidating certain actions for all purposes; and the motion is not opposed by the plaintiff. Defendant’s motion is disposed of as follows:

As to the action enumerated in the attached Schedule identified with the suffix (A) the motion and the said action are dismissed for prematurity by reason of the fact that in contravention of 19 U.S.C.A., section 1503(a) (section 503(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1953) liquidation of the subject entry was not made upon a -final appraised value, and as such, is void, liquidation having taken place within 60 days of the date of the appraiser’s report. See United States v. Boston Paper Board Co., 23 CCPA 372, T.D. 48233 (1936), and other cases cited in Memorandum to Accompany Order in Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. United States, protest 69/38803, C.D. 4301, decided December 1,1971. It is the duty of the regional commissioner of customs to liquidate the involved entry in the manner provided for by law so that plaintiff may file a valid protest against said entry if it be so advised.

As to the actions enumerated in the said Schedule identified with the suffix (B) the motion, being unopposed and within the court’s jurisdiction, is granted, and the said actions will be consolidated under iead number 69/26905.

Schedule oe Actions

69/19226 (A)

69/26905 (B)

69/28668 (B)

69/29005 (B)  