
    STATE v. WILL WALTON, FLOYD WALTON, JULE BETHEA, alias JULE EASTERLING, and WILL McLEAN, alias WILL SHAW.
    (Filed 21 November, 1923.)
    1. Murder — Evidence—Accessories—Questions for Jury — Trials—Nonsuit.
    Evidence in this case that the defendants, charged with being accessories before and after the fact of murder, were with the principals in an automobile, aiding and abetting them, at the time and place of the offense committed, who had since fled the country to avoid the trial; that the deceased was found unconscious and in a dying condition the morning following the night in which the deed was done; and circumstances tending to show that the defendants had afterwards aided the escape of the principals in the automobile: Seld, sufficient upon the facts of this case to sustain a verdict of conviction of the charge of being accessories to the murder before and after the fact; and their motion as of nonsuit at the close of all of the evidence was properly denied.
    2. Same — Statutes.
    • Under the provisions of C. S., secs. 4175-4177, it is not required that the principals be first convicted of the charge of murder to convict the accessories thereto, either before or after the fact, upon sufficient evidence.
    3. Same.
    Where there are three charged as principals with murder, the acquittal of one of them, the others having fled the jurisdiction of the court, does not of itself acquit the prisoners on trial as accessories before or after the fact, when the evidence of their guilt of the offense charged is sufficient both as to them as accessories and the principals directly charged with the murder.
    4. Murder — Evidence—Anger.
    Where the anger of the parties towards the deceased is a circumstance to be considered with other evidence as tending to show the act of murder by the principals, and that the defendants were accessories thereto, a witness may testify the conclusion of his mind that they were angry when he saw them together just preceding commission of the offense.
    5. Sam© — Identity of Pi’incipai — Motive—Effect upon Accessory.
    Evidence was competent on this trial of the defendants as accessories to a murder, as to the identity of one charged as principal thereto; and the effect of his acts and conduct'upon the accessories upon the former’s hearing a statement which evidenced a motive for the killing."
    Appeal by defendants from Sinclair, J., at August Term, 1923, of Hoke.
    This was an indictment charging Len "Walton, Cyrus McLean and Will McLean, alias Will Shaw, with the murder of Dewey Castleberry. The second count charged Floyd Walton, Will Walton and Jule Bethea, alias Jule Easterling, with being accessories before the fact of such murder; and the third count charged Floyd Walton, Will Walton and Tule Bethea with being accessories after the fact of said murder. Len Walton and Cyrus McLean were fugitives from justice and, therefore, not on trial. Will McLean, alias Will Shaw, was acquitted by the jury. Floyd Walton, Will Walton and Jule Bethea were convicted upon a general verdict of guilty upon the other two counts, and from the judgment upon such conviction the two Waltons and Pule Bethea appealed.
    
      Attorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.
    
    
      Smith & McQueen and Currie & Leach for prisoners.
    
   Clakk, C. P.

Dewey Castleberry, the deceased, was found desperately wounded near a cross-roads, about six miles from Red Springs in Hoke County, on Sunday morning, 15 Puly, 1923. Late in the afternoon of the day before, the deceased had some difficulty while driving his Ford car along the road with the prisoner Floyd Walton, who was himself driving a Chalmers car, the property of Henry McNeill. The cause of the difficulty does not appear but it was shown that Dewey Castleberry, a white man, fired a pistol at Walton and wounded him in one of his arms. Later that afternoon Will Walton, Floyd Walton and Pule Bethea went to Red Springs to have Floyd’s wound attended to. Between 8 and 9 o’clock that night they were shown to have been at Red Springs. Truby Castleberry, a brother of the deceased, testified that Avhen they came into the drug store where he was at the time, that Floyd Walton said they were going to “get my brother that night; he said my brother had shot him through the arm; that he was on the road near Baxter McLean’s, near a swamp, when my brother shot him in the arm. He said the three of them were going to get my brother that night and I told him to let the officers do that.” The defendants were all colored men.

After Floyd’s wound was attended to by the doctor, these three left in the Chalmers car and went towards the cross-roads where the deceased was found desperately wounded the following morning. Truby Castleberry also testified that this Chalmers car used by the prisoners had only one light burning.

T. P. Pones, driving a horse and buggy, left Red Springs that Saturday night after dark. He lived about three-quarters of a mile from the cross-roads at which Dewey Castleberry was shot. He testified that as he was driving along that Saturday night he met some one near the place where Castleberry was shot and this person stopped him. He is under the impression that such person was Len Walton. There were two more persons standing off near there but he did not recognize them. One of these persons had a gun in his hand. He also met a car going towards Bed Springs Laving only one light, about half a mile from where Castleberry was found next morning. • Driving on past this place about 800 yards he stopped at the house of A. L. McLendon, and while talking to him both of them heard three gunshots in the direction of the cross-roads.

McLendon testified that Jones stopped at his house about a quarter past nine o’clock, and while he was there there was some shooting taking place about the cross-roads, and that Jones told him that some one had held him up at the cross-roads and he thought he was going to be robbed when he was stopped, and that he took the man who stopped him to be Len Walton. McLendon and Jones had a clear view of this cross-roads, which was 547 yards off, and before they heard the shots they saw two automobiles come up to the cross-roads and both of these stopped, and soon after they heard the shots.

Both Jones and McLendon early the following morning went to the cross-roads and found Dewey Castleberry' desperately wounded with the left side of his head bloody and mangled by shot from a shotgun. He was alive when they got there 'but unconscious. They testified that he had evidently ridden to this place in his Ford car and was sitting in it when shot, for the top of the machine showed this and the wind-shield in front was.broken as though the gun had been fired at close range. On the right-hand side of the car, their testimony is that they saw tracks which indicated that a man was sitting down there on his haunches. On the left-hand side of the road they found the print of the toes of a man’s shoes and the print of his knees on the ground, indicating that he was on his knees, and they found a gun-shell just a few steps from these knee-prints and another gun-shell on the public road a few feet off. They also found another shell where Castleberry’s Ford left the road and ran out in the cotton patch. A physician, Dr. Johnson, was secured by the neighbors immediately that Sunday morning, and he carried Castleberry to the hospital in Fayetteville where he lingered until the following Saturday morning. The doctor described the wounds which he said caused the death of Castleberry.

Truby Castleberry left Eed Springs after the Chalmers car containing Floyd Walton, Will Walton and Jule Bethea, in a Ford car, and passed them. They followed him going in the direction *of the cross-roads at which his brother was killed. This Chalmers car belonged to Henry McNeill, but was lent by him to Floyd Walton that afternoon and was returned to him about 11 o’clock that night, the defendants Will Walton, Floyd Walton and Jule Bethea being still in it.

After Floyd Walton was shot by Castleberry, and on his way to Bed Springs, he stopped at Duffie’s Station, and when he arrived there a big crowd gathered around him. Soon after, Cyrus McLean ran out and cranked up bis car, wbieb was a Ford two-seated runabout, saying at tbe time that be was going borne to get bis gun. Tbe witness, Willie McByrde, beard bim say that Castleberry had shot Floyd Walton. Cyrus McLean came back soon and inquired if tbe Chalmers bad come back, and then went down tbe road in bis car. There was another man in tbe car with bim, but the witness could not identify bim as it was after dark.

John McLean passed tbe cross-roads, at which Castleberry was after-wards shot, somewhere about 8 o’clock that night and saw three men there, two of whom were in tbe cotton patch and the other in tbe road. Tbe witness did not recognize tbe two in tbe cotton patch but recognized Len Walton as tbe man in tbe road.

Ernest Jordan passed along tbe road at this point between 8 and 9 o’clock that night traveling in a Ford touring car. He saw a Ford roadster standing just a few steps from tbe cross-roads. There were seven or eight men there at that time, two or three in tbe car and two or three around tbe car. Len Walton stepped from behind tbe car and motioned witness to stop, which be did, and recognized tbe man at tbe steering wheel of tbe roadster as Cyrus McLean but did not recognize tbe others. After passing this point tbe witness met Dewey Castleberry coming from Red Springs and going towards tbe place be.bad just left.

Major McNeill also passed this point, driving a mule, between 8 and 9 o’clock that night. There was a one-seated car on tbe right-band side of tbe road and two people in it. There was also a man standing on tbe edge of tbe road who asked bim, “Did you see Mr. Castleberry down tbe road; be shot my'brother this afternoon and I want to see bim.” He recognized the man by bis voice as Len Walton.

Baker, an officer at Red Springs, corroborated Truby Castleberry that Will Walton told tbe officers they bad better take care of Mr. Castle-berry that night; if tbe officers did not, they would. Tbe crowd with Walton seemed to be pretty angry and talked angrily about tbe affair. Tbe night watchman at Red Springs testified to tbe same purport.

Ralph Livingston lived about 500 yards from tbe spot where Castle-berry was shot. He saw tbe Chalmers car pass with Floyd Walton, Will Walton and several other colored people in it. Tbe ear passed within eight or ten feet of bim. After passing, it came back again and went toward Duffie’s Station, and then came back past bis bouse right after tbe shooting occurred. This witness beard the shooting, which occurred about twenty minutes past 9 o’clock by bis time. At that time tbe ear was going at a very rapid rate of speéd.

Tbe above is a summary of tbe evidence pertinent to charge from which it would appear that tbe jury adopted tbe view that tbe appellants did not do tbe killing, but aided and abetted Cyrus McLean and Len Walton in the murder, for they convicted these three defendants of being accessories, both before and after the fact. • Both Cyrus McLean and Len Walton disappeared from the community after the killing. All these witnesses, the deceased, and the defendants lived in the community.

From the fact that Floyd Walton did not return the Chalmers car to Henry McNeill until 11 o’clock, and from the other circumstances in the case, the jury drew the inference that these defendants also assisted Cyrus McLean and Len Walton in making their escape after the killing.

We think his Honor properly refused to enter a nonsuit at the conclusion of the State’s evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence. The exception that the court permitted the witness Jones to testify that he took the man who held him up at the cross-roads that night to be Len Walton was properly overruled. S. v. Spencer, 176 N.. C., 713; S. v. Lytle, 117 N. C., 803, and S. v. Thorp, 72 N. C., 186. The court properly permitted Willie McBryde to testify, as above, to what Cyrus McLean said and did upon his hearing that Dewey Castleberry had shot Floyd Walton.

Cyrus McLean and Len Walton were identified by the witness as two of the men apparently lying in wait for Castleberry at the cross-roads. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that this was a joint enterprise upon the part of all the parties engaged directly in the killing or encouraging it.

It was not necessary to prove that Cyrus McLean and .Len Walton killed Castleberry, for it was unnecessary to find the principals guilty under the present statute — C. S., 4175, 4177 — -before the jury could find the other defendants guilty of being accessories. The'evidence brought out was admissible in every respect in the case against the parties on trial.

There was also exception to the court permitting the policeman to testify that the crowd present in Eed Springs at the time they went to secure a doctor for Floyd Walton seemed to be angry about the shooting of Floyd. This was a conclusion of the mind as to the mental condition of the parties, and admissible. S. v. Spencer, 176 N. C., 709; Renn v. R. R., 170 N. C., 128; S. v. Leak, 156 N. C., 643.

The defendants make a further objection that Will McLean, who was tried for the murder of Castleberry, having been acquitted, the verdict necessarily would result in the acquittal of the other defendants charged with being accessories before and after the fact of the killing. But the charge in this case is that the defendants were accessories both before and after the fact. The acquittal of McLean was not an acquittal of Len Walton and Cyrus McLean. C. S., 4175 to 4177, inclusive, is directly applicable to the facts of this case. S. v. Bryson, 173 N. C., 803; S. v. Reid. 178 N. C., 745.

It is not necessary to consider tbe other exceptions. Of the three parties charged with the murder, one was acquitted and the other two were fugitives from justice, and therefore not on trial. These defendants were on trial as accessories both before and after the fact, and we cannot say that there was not evidence from which the jury properly could arrive at the verdict that they were guilty as charged. Taking all the evidence into consideration, there was certainly more than a suspicion that these parties were accessories before the fact, and there was sufficient evidence in the movement of the car, of which these defendants were in possession, to justify the conclusion that they also participated in the escape of the two men charged by the grand jury with the murder. They were not convicted because not on trial, but the evidence pointed to them as guilty of the murder, and the evidence, though circumstantial, was properly submitted to the jury upon the charge that these prisoners were accessories to the murder.

No error.  