
    No. 9540.
    Voltz v. Rawles et al.
    From the Fountain Circuit Court.
    
      J. B. Martin and J. W. Copner, for appellant.
    
      L. Nebeker, for appellees.
   Howk, J.

By a written agreement filed, “it is conceded and admitted by the appellant and the appellees that the only question involved in this cause is identical with the question involved in Voltz v. Rawles,” ante, p. 198.

Upon the authority of the case cited, this cause must be decided as that was decided.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.  