
    Richard G. CHATFIELD, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant.
    No. WD 36888.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Jan. 21, 1986.
    Robert Davis Aulgur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for appellant.
    Michael C. McIntosh, Independence, for respondent.
    Before CLARK, C.J., and TURNAGE and KENNEDY, JJ.
   CLARK, Chief Judge.

Richard G. Chatfield was arrested September 19, 1984 in Kansas City at 47th and Main Streets when he was observed to drive his automobile through the intersection against a red traffic signal. Chatfield displayed conditions associated with alcohol intoxication and upon testing with a chemical breathalyzer, Chatfield was found to have a blood alcohol concentration of .16 percent. Notice of driver’s license suspension was issued pursuant to §§ 302.500-540, RSMo.Cum.Supp.1984 and the suspension was affirmed on administrative review.

A de novo trial in the circuit court resulted in a reversal of the suspension order and the Director of Revenue has appealed. The sole issue in the case is respondent’s contention the suspension proceedings were invalid because no showing was made of probable cause to believe, at or prior to the time of respondent’s arrest, that his level of intoxication equalled or exceeded the statutory level of .13 percent.

The issues in this case are governed by Schranz v. Director of Revenue, 703 S.W.2d 912 (Mo.App.1986) [decided today]. On the authority of that decision, the judgment of the circuit court ordering reinstatement of respondent’s license privileges is reversed. The order by the Department of Revenue suspending respondent’s driving license is reinstated for a period to be determined by the Department of Revenue in accordance with § 302.525.2, RSMo.Cum.Supp.1984. Costs are assessed against respondent.  