
    25253.
    Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold.
    Decided December 20, 1935.
    
      W. E. Mann, W. G. Mann, for plaintiff in error.
    
      T. G. Head, contra.
   Guerry, J.

Under the evidence, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s plea that the notes sued on were without consideration was not sustained by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.  