
    Andrew BOEHM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96433.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 24, 2012.
    
      Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Boehm appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.
     