
    Harry W. Hecht, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Willis E. Comstock and Mae B. Comstock, his wife, and Gheen R. Abbott, Defendants in Error.
    
    144 So. 308.
    Division A.
    Decision filed November 3, 1932.
    
      Ira C. Haycock, of Miami, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      James M. Carson and James B. Flaherty, of Miami, for Defendants in Error.
   Per Curiam.

This cause haying heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.  