
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Keveion SHINE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-30913
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Feb. 24, 2015.
    Elizabeth A. Privitera, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kevin G. Boitmann, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jordan Mark Siverd, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Keveion Shine, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, USDC No. 2:12-CR-146-1.
    Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Keveion Shine has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Shine has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Shine’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Shine’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     