
    MIAMI BEACH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida non-profit corp., and Mildred Falk, Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY ELECTIONS BOARD, and the City of Miami Beach, Florida, a Florida Municipal Corporation, Appellees.
    No. 88-61.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 8, 1988.
    Rehearing Denied April 19, 1988.
    Willard K. Splittstoesser and Joseph H. Weil, North Miami, for appellants.
    Arnold M. Weiner, City of Miami Beach Atty. and Jean K. Olin, Asst. City Atty., Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Murray A. Greenberg, Asst. Co. Atty., Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

In our view, the description of the Miami Beach ballot proposition in question was neither unfairly stated nor misleading. Hill v. Milander, 72 So.2d 796 (Fla.1954); Metropolitan Dade County v. Shiver, 365 So.2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), aff’d sub nom. Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 394 So.2d 981 (Fla.1981); compare Askew v. Firestone, 421 So.2d 151 (Fla.1982). The trial judge therefore correctly dismissed the instant attempt to invalidate the result of the election. See also Wadhams v. Board of County Comm’rs of Sarasota County, 501 So.2d 120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Affirmed. 
      
      . This conclusion makes it unnecessary to consider the other grounds advanced for affirmance.
     