
    No. 3706.
    Dyer et al. v. Railway Co. et al.
    (Decided February 7, 1896.)
    Error to the Circuit Court of Hamilton county.
    
      Burch (& Johnson for plaintiffs in error.
    Spiegel, Bromwell & Foraker and Hollister & Hollister, for defendants in error.
   Dismissed for the reason that the brief of the plaintiff in error was not filed in a reasonable time before the call of the case, as required by Rule 4, as revised 1894. The brief of the plaintiff was filed on the Saturday before the call, the call being- made on the following Tuesday.  