
    Joseph M. W. Kitchen, complainant, v. John O. H. Pitney et al., defendants.
    [Decided February 1st, 1923.]
    On appeal of Apphia Longworth Locke Kerfoot et al.
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Eielder, whose opinion is reported in 94 N. J. Eq. 485.
    
    
      Messrs Lwn, Tamllyn & Colyer, for the complainant.
    
      Messrs. Ilowe ,<& Davis, Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Skinner and Messrs. McCarter & English for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Eielder.

For affirmance ■—• The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—14:

For reversal—None.  