
    RAMAPO MFG. CO. v. MAPES.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    May 17, 1912.)
    Action by the Ramapo Manufacturing Company against Julia Pierson Mapes.
   PER CURIAM.

There is no clear evidence

that the order denying defendant’s application to postpone the trial has been entered, nor that any motion to open the default has been made, nor that any notice of appeal has been served. Under such circumstances this court will not entertain this application. Motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon further papers.  