
    WATERMAN BLDG. CO. v. ROSE.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 29, 1911.)
    Aupeál from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by the Waterman Building Company against Samuel B. Rose. From an order- denying'a motion to vacate an attachment, defendant appeals. Reversed.
    Walter E. Godfrey, for appellant.
    Watson & Raymond, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The allegations in the affidavits upon which the warrant of attachment was granted are wholly insufficient, and’ the motion to vacate the same should have been granted. Order reversed, with costs, and motion to vacate attachment granted.  