
    SUGARMAN v. STATE.
    (No. 3105.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 29, 1914.)
    Indictment and Information (§ 81) — Complaint and Information — Suffieciency— Allegation of Christian Name.
    A complaint and information, alleging that the Christian name of accused is unknown, support a conviction, if otherwise good, where accused does not, during the trial, suggest his name and no motion in regard thereto is made.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Indictment and Information, Cent. Dig. §§ 216-224; Dec. Dig. § 81.] •
    Appeal from Bexar County Court; J. R. Davis, Judge.
    One Sugarman was convicted of crime, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexei
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.

The complaint and information allege that the Christian name of appellant was un-unown. When tried, he did not suggest what nis name really was, and no motion in .regard thereto was made. No statement of facts accompanies the record; neither does it contain any motion for a new trial, nor any order on such motion if any was filed, the recognizance taken in the case reciting that an appeal had been taken to this court.

The complaint and information being sufficient, the judgment is affirmed.  