
    Aimone Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Carl R. Schultz et al., as Trustees of Louise Schultz et al., Respondents.
    (Argued May 11, 1925;
    decided June 2, 1925.)
    
      Landlord and tenant — specific performance — action to compel specific performance of alleged agreement to renew lease.
    
    
      Aimone Mfg. Co. v. Schultz, 210 App. Div. 41, affirmed.
    Appeal from a judgment, entered July 12, 1924, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a. judgment in favor of plaintiff entere^ upon the report of a referee and directing a dismissal of the complaint. The action was to compel specific performance by the defendant trustees of an alleged oral, agreement to renew a lease of certain property occupied by the plaintiff as a factory at Nos. 433-437 East Twenty-second street and Nos. 430-436 East Twenty-third street, in the city of New York, for a term of five years commencing May 1, 1921.
    
      Robert S. Johnstone and Ellery O. Anderson for appellant.
    
      Henry T. Hall for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.  