
    Florence Wilson NZONGOLA, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees.
    No. 04-7049.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Nov. 1, 2004.
    Florence Wilson Nzongola, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Edward Eugene Schwab, Dep. Atty. Gen., Office of Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, for DefendantAppellee.
    Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 340). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed March 25, 2004, the only order as to which this appeal is timely, be affirmed. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of the dismissal of appellant’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Browder v. Director. Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 263 n. 7, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978), as any federal claims were patently insubstantial. See Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C.Cir.1994).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.  