
    The State, ex rel. Behm, v. Wolfert et al.
    
      Supreme ..Court — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 18557
    Decided July 1, 1924.)
    Error to the Court- of Appeals of Lucas county.
    
      Messrs. Hackett & Lynch, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. D. J. O’Rourke and Messrs. Lawton & Saalfield, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that -said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.  