
    PEGRAM v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 3, 1913.)
    Contempt (§ 66*) — Appeal.
    Appeal will not lie from a judgment in proceedings in accordance with Code Cr. Proe. 1911, art. 528 et seq., fining one for contempt of court in refusing to obey a subpoena.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Contempt, Cent. Dig. §.§ 213-215, 223-237; Dec. Dig. § 66.*]
    . Appeal from Criminal District Court, Harris County; C. W. Robinson, Judge.
    W. P. Pegram was fined for contempt of court, and appeals.
    Dismissed.
    Woods & Harris, of Houston, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, P. J.

The appellant was fined by the lower court for contempt of court in refusing to obey a subpoena. The record shows that the proceedings were strictly in accordance with article 528 et seq., C. C. P., and that on the proper final hearing the judgment nisi was made final.

It has been the uniform holding of this court and our Supreme Court, when it had criminal jurisdiction, that appeals did not lie in such proceedings. It is unnecessary to cite all the cases; but see State v. Thurmond, 37 Tex. 341; Carter v. State, 4 Tex. App. 165; Crow v. State, 24 Tex. 12; Borrer v. State, 63 S. W. 1133.

As this court has no jurisdiction of this appeal, the case is ordered dismissed.  