
    Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Gish, Brook & Co.
    No. 273.
    Opinion Filed November 9, 1909.
    (105 Pac. 673.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Record—Statement as to Evidence — Review. Where the case-made upon appeal does not contain a statement that it contains all the evidence presented upon 'the trial, no error assigned which requires an examination of the evidence „ can be reviewed by this court.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
      Error from District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge.
    
    Action by Gish, Brook & Co. against the Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
    Motion to reinstate dismissal denied, and writ of error dismissed.
    
      William Thompson and Fulton, Stringer & Grant, for plaintiff in error.
    
      A. J. Moms,- for defendant in error.
   Hates, J.

The status of this case is the same as that of Insurance Company of North America v. Gish, Brook & Co., ante, p. 78, 105 Pac. 672. The reasoning and conclusions of the court in that case must follow in this.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

All the Justices concur.  