
    12308.
    Pope v. The State.
    Decided May 11, 1921.
    Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Houston county — Judge Riley. February 31, 1931.
    
      B. N. Holtzclaw, Marx Kunz, for plaintiff in error. -
   Broyles, C. J.

The circumstantial evidence upon which the defendant was convicted not being sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of her guilt, the court erred in overruling her motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  