
    The North River Steamboat Company, Respondent, v. The Home Insurance Company, Appellant.
   Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the parties by their conduct under similar policies in the past had construed the meaning of this clause — the right of the assured to go to a dry dock south of Piermont. Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur; Jaycox, J., dissents on the ground of a breach of warranty in going south of Piermont, contrary to the terms of the policy, with whom Blackmar, P. J., concurs.  