
    Harriston BECK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 97816.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 18, 2012.
    Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., John Winston Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON,-J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harriston Beck (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  