
    HARRIS v. STATE.
    (No. 9360.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 15, 1925.)
    Criminal law &wkey;!097(5) — Exceptions to charge ■ not considered, in absence of statement .of facts.
    In absence of statement of facts in record, exceptions to court’s charge' cannot be considered, as their pertinence cannot be determined.
    <&wkey;>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
    Appeal from District Court, Victoria County; John M. Green, Judge.
    Val Harris was convicted of felony theft, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Tom Garrard, State’s Atty., and Grover C. Morris, Asst. State’s Atty., both of- Austin, for the State.
   DATTIMORE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Victoria county of felony theft, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Exceptions were reserved to the court’s charge, but, in the absence of statement of facts, their pertinence cannot be determined. The charge of the court and the indictment appear to be in conformity with the law.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.  