
    MARVIN J. MERCHANT and another, Appellants, v. MILO M. BELDING and others, Respondents.
    Appeal from a judgment recovered on the report of a referee. The question in the case was one of fact as to plaintiffs’ employment by defendants.'
    The General Term held, that the referee was fully warranted by the evidence in taking the view which he did of the plaintiffs’ case. He held them not entitled to recover, and the judgment entered upon his report was affirmed.
    
      Francis C. Bowen, for the appellants.
    
      W. B. Putney, for the respondents.
   Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.  