
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean A. SULLIVAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-30135.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 14, 2009.
    
    Filed July 23, 2009.
    Frank V. Russo, Jo Ann Farrington, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Linda Anna Webb, Hagans, Ahearn & Webb, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Sean A. Sullivan appeals from the three concurrent 120-month sentences imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and attempted distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). We have jurisdietion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sullivan contends that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement does not preclude this appeal because: (1) his plea agreement was ambiguous; and (2) the district court advised him at sentencing that he retained the right to appeal his sentence. These contentions are belied by the record. We therefore enforce the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-84 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175-77 (9th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     