
    Michael R. RAY, on behalf of himself personally and as initial class representative pending the appointment of counsel to represent the class, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVERCOM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; Lexington County, on behalf of Lexington County Detention Center; Pay Tel Communications, Incorporated; John Vincent Townsend, Personally and as President of Pay Tel Communications, Inc.; Sprint Payphone Services, Incorporated, now known as Embarq Payphone Services, Incorpo rated; South Carolina Budget and Control Board, State of; South Carolina Department of Corrections; Florence County, on behalf of Florence County Detention Center, Defendants-Appellees, and Darlington County, on behalf of Darlington County Detention Center; Dillon County, on behalf of Dillon County Detention Center; Spartanburg County, on behalf of Spartanburg County Detention Center; Williamsburg County, on behalf of Williamsburg County Detention Center; Dennis L. Whipple, Personally and as President and CEO of Evercom Systems, Inc., Defendants.
    No. 09-7753.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 20, 2010.
    Decided: May 24, 2010.
    Michael R. Ray, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, Davidson & Lindemann, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; John J. Pringle, Jr., Ellis, Lawhorne & Sims, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, Brant Mitchell Laue, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, Kansas City, Missouri; Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., Samuel C. Weldon, Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, Stephanie A. Joyce, Arent Fox, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael R. Ray appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing the federal claims with prejudice and dismissing the state law claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ray v. Evercom Sys., Inc., No. 4:05-cv-2904-RBH, 2009 WL 2997607 (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  