
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfonso Alverez BANDA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-15828
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    May 11, 2012.
    R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Carlton R. Bourne, Jr., Stephen Thomas Inman, Patricia Green Rhodes, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Augusta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jacque Dulaine Hawk, The Hawk Firm, Augusta, GA, Alfonso Alverez Banda, FCI Jesup-Inmate Legal Mail, Jesup, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Alfonso Banda appeals his 235-month sentence after being found guilty for one count of possession with intent to distribute not less than 500 grams of a mixture of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal, Banda argues the district court failed to properly consider his age and infirmities at sentencing, as his sentence essentially equates to life without parole. After review, we affirm Banda’s sentence.

Banda does not meet his burden of demonstrating his sentence was unreasonable in light of the record and the § 3553(a) factors. The district court explicitly mentioned its consideration of Banda’s age, along with the § 3553(a) factors, the statements of the parties, and the PSI. See United States v. Talley, 431 F.3d 784, 786 (11th Cir.2005) (“[A]n acknowledgment by the district court that it has considered the defendant’s arguments and the factors in section 3553(a) is sufficient.”). Further, the weight to be given to Banda’s age was within the district court’s discretion. See United States v. Langston, 590 F.3d 1226, 1237 (11th Cir.2009). Finally, the court’s sentence of 235 months represented the lowest end of the applicable guideline range, and we ordinarily expect such a sentence to be reasonable. See Talley, 431 F.3d at 787-88. Banda was caught with nearly 2 pounds of methamphetamine; his 235-month sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . We review the reasonableness of a sentence under a deferential abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 591, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). “The party challenging the sentence bears the burden to show it is unreasonable in light of the record and the § 3553(a) factors.” United States v. Tome, 611 F.3d 1371, 1378 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 674, 178 L.Ed.2d 502 (2010).
     