
    SCOTT et al. v. WATT, Chief of Police, et al.
    No. 26571.
    Nov. 26, 1935.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 7, 1936.
    Bruce & Jefferson, for plaintiffs in error.
    Harlan Deupree, Municipal Counselor, and Ralph May, Asst. Municipal Counselor, for defendants in error.
   RILEY, J.

The plaintiffs below, plaintiffs in error, sought by this action injunc-tive process to restrain and prevent the enforcement of ordinance No. >4624, city of Oklahoma City. From an adverse judgment an appeal has been perfected. The issue presented is determined by the decision in Allen v. Oklahoma City et al., 175 Okla. 421, 52 P. (2d) 1054, this day determined. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in conformity with the views expressed in the cited companion cause.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, Y. C. J., and BAYLESS, BUSBY, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. PHELPS, J.. not participating.  