
    Isidor Blumenthal, Respondent, v. Zecharias Exiner, Appellant.
    Appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered on a verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    ■ Giller.cm <£s Ford, for appellant.
    
      Steuér <& Rosenthal, for. respondent.
   Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The question involved was whether the defendant made the promissory notes sued, upon; this- was submitted to the jury on- conflicting evidence, and their finding; thereon being Satisfactorily sustained by the proofs, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.  