
    E. L. Realty Company v. Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations
    Superior Court New London County
    File No. 23270
    Memorandum filed December 6, 1955
    
    
      Gilman, Jacobson & Laudone, of Norwich, for the plaintiff.
    
      John J. Bracken, attorney general, and Daniel E. Ryan, assistant attorney general, for the defendant.
    
      
       Publication of this decision was determined upon in connection with the publication of Bisogno v. Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations, which follows immediately.
    
   Devlin, J.

After a hearing before the defendant board, Local No. 453 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Employees and Moving Picture Machine Operators (A.P. of L.) was certified to be the sole bargaining agent of the plaintiff’s employees. An appeal was taken from this action under § 7395 (4) of the 1949 Revision (General Statutes §31-109 [d]). This motion raises the question whether there was a “final order” within the meaning of the appe'al provision.

Is the certification of a bargaining agent by the board an order which is review able ¶ A review of the cases evidences a distinction between an order of the board restraining an unfair labor practice and a certification in representation proceedings. It is only when an unfair labor practice is involved that the right of review is given. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 308 U.S. 401; National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 308 U.S. 413; Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 197 F.2d 512; 2 Teller, Labor Disputes and Collective Bargaining, p. 1095. Such is not the situation here.

The motion is granted.  