
    20043.
    Corbitt v. The State.
    Decided November 13, 1929.
    
      I. J. Bussell, for plaintiff in error.
    
      A. B. Spence, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, are treated as abandoned.

2. The verdict Was authorized by the evidence and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  