
    COMBS against MURPHY.
    ON CERTIORARI.
    The reason relied on for the reversal of the judgment of the justice, was, that the justice had allowed in the rendering judgment for the costs, for four witnesses, contrary to the provisions of the act of Assembly on the subject. But it appeared that there had [t] been two trials before a verdict was had, and that two witnesses had been sworn on the part of the plaintiff below, in whose favor the judgment was rendered, at each trial.
    
      Wall, for the plaintiff.
    
      Boggs, for defendant.
   By the Court.

The plaintiff was entitled to the costs of two witnesses at each trial.

Judgment affirmed.  