
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ivan Rodrigo LUNA-PEREZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-10248.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00673-JAT.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 9, 2004.
    
    Decided Aug. 13, 2004.
    Jeffrey A. Myer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Ivan Rodrigo Luna-Perez, Safford, AZ, pro se.
    Darius M. Nickerson, Burns, Nickerson & Taylor, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant Appellant.
    Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ivan Rodrigo Luna-Perez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 135-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.

Counsel for Luna-Perez has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     