
    Carl C. CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
    July 18, 1956.
    Rehearing Denied Sept 13, 1956.
    Charles J. Bodner and Rosenhouse & Rosenhouse, Miami, for appellant.
    Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen.; and Jos. P. Manners, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to he heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and THOMAS, PIOBSON and BUFORD, JJ., concur.  