
    Disciplinary Counsel v. Giba.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Giba, 135 Ohio St.3d 1310, 2013-Ohio-1979.]
    (No. 2005-2250
    Submitted May 15, 2013
    Decided May 16, 2013.)
   {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Paul Robert Giba, Attorney Registration No. 0005732, last known business address in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of January 27, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), suspended respondent for a period of two years and ordered that he will not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Pennsylvania, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.  