
    Murchison v. Hall.
    Tho case of Hancock v. McKinney (7 Tex. R., 3St) cited, and the points therein adjudicated hold to apply to a caso in which the party asserting a forfeiture claimed by titie issued in lSUL
    Appeal from Houston. The facts in this ease wore similar to those in the ease of Hancock v. McKinney, (7 Tex. E., 381,) tlic only difference being that the app'dlant in this ease claimed under an original title for a league of land issued to him by (lie Mexican authorities on December 30lli, 1834. The grant under winch the appellee claimed was made to Ramon de la Garza, May 7th, 1831, for eleven leagues of land.
    
      B. Gillespie and 1. Taylor, for appellant.
    
      V. B. Howard and J. P. Henderson, for appellee.
    IYheelee, J., did not sit in this case.
   Lipscomb, J.

On au examination of the record and the appellant’s brief we find that lite material points presented were adjudicated by this court at Austin December Term 1SS1, in the case of Hancock v. McKinney, and according to tiie decision in that ease the judgment of the court below in this is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.  