
    TERRY v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 10, 1912.)
    Bail (§ 70) — Appeal—Recognizance.
    An appeal bond, presented to the sheriff, who approved it, is not a compliance with Code Cr. Proc. 1895, art. 886, providing that accused, appealing in a case of misdemeanor, shall be committed to jail unless he enters into a recognizance, which must be taken in open court, and the appeal on motion of the state will be dismissed.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bail, Dec. Dig. § 70.]
    Appeal from Harrison County Court; G. L. Huffman, Judge.
    Spec Terry was convicted of simple assault, and he appeals.
    Dismissed.
    
      F. M. Scott and Geo. J. Ryan, for appellant. John W. Scott, Go. Atty., R. A. Hall, Asst. Co. Atty., and O. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      i;.’or other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted under a complaint and information charging him with making an aggravated assault upon Prank Kane. When tried, he was convicted of simple assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $10.

The Assistant Attorney General has moved to dismiss the appeal, because it appears from the record that defendant is not in custody, and has not entered into a recognizance as required by law. It appears that after his motion for a new trial had been overruled, instead of entering into a recognizance in open court, he made an appeal bond and presented it to the sheriff, who approved same, and which bond was filed with the clerk of the county court on the 12th day of August, 1911. Article 886 of the Oode of Criminal Procedure of 1895 provides: “When the defendant appeals in any case of misdemeanor he shall be committed to jail unless he enter into a recognizance.” In the case of Herron v. State, 27 Tex. 337, it is said: “There is no recognizance as is required by law. There is an appeal bond, which appears to have been approved by the clerk. The appeal bond is not sufficient to sustain the appeal. The law requires a recognizance, which must be- taken in open court.” This opinion was rendered in 1863, and has been followed in an unbroken line of decisions from that day to this. In misdemeanor cases a defendant must enter into a recognizance in open court or be confined in jail. Allison v. State, 33 Tex. Cr. R. 501, 26 S. W. 1080, and cases collated in White’s Annotated Code of Criminal Procedure, § 1239.

The motion is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.  