
    9794.
    Littlefield v. The State.
    Decided November 1, 1918.
   Harwell, J.

The evidence amply authorized .the defendant’s conviction of having and possessing intoxicating liquors, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Indictment for possession of intoxicating liquor; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.

W~ E. Mann, Olénn & House, for .plaintiff in error.

Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.  