
    HULME v. DUNLAVEY et al.
    
    No. 4845.
    Opinion Filed July 27, 1915.
    (150 Pac. 1054.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs—Necessity. Wliere plaintiff in error-lias failed to file brief as required by rule 7 of tbis court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), and offered no excuse for such failure, tbe cause-will be dismissed.
    (■Syllabus by McKeown, O.)
    
      Error from Superior Court, Custer County; J. W. Lawter, Judge.
    
    Action by W. W. Dunlavey against Elcie Maud: Moore, George ,W. Hulme, and others. Judgment for' plaintiff, and defendant George W. Hulme brings error;.
    Dismissed.
    
      Geo. T. Webster, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Swan C. Burnette, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

McKEOWN, C.

The petition in error and"' the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this' court February 27, 1913. Neither party has filed a brief,, nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so. It: is? evident that the appeal has been abandoned, and the motion of defendant in error tp dismiss will be sustained, and cause dismissed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix).

By the Court: It is so ordered.  