
    YOUNG v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 19, 1913.)
    Criminal Haw (§ 1090*)—Review—Suki-ciency or Record.
    On appeal from a conviction, objection that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence is not reviewable, where the evidence is not presented by statement of facts or bill of exceptions.
    (Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Leon County; S. W. Dean, Judge.
    Bill Young was convicted of an offense, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

This record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions.

There is nothing in the motion for new trial which requires a reversal. The only ground of the motion for new trial is that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence. The testimony is not before us; and therefore that question cannot be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed.  