
    ROBERTS v. UNDERWOOD et al.
    
    No. 2616.
    Opinion Filed May 6, 1913.
    Rehearing Denied June 10, 1913.
    (132 Pac. 673.)
    ■CÍASE FOLLOWED. Syllabus same as in the case oí Pigeon et al. v. Buck ét al., ante, 131 Pac. 1083.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
      Error from. District Court, Pontotoc County; Summers Hardy, Judge.
    
    Action by Elias Roberts against Gabriel Underwood and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
    Affirmed.
    
      Winfield S. Farmer, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Fooshee & Brunson, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

The issues involved in the above-entitled case are identical with those in the case of Pigeon et al. v. Buck et al., ante, 131 Pac. 1083, handed down at this terms of court, and on the-authority of that case the decision of the trial court is accordingly affirmed.

WILLIAMS, J., not participating.  