
    (34 Misc. Rep. 518.)
    LEVY v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    April 8, 1901.)
    Appeal—Interlocutory Judgment.
    An appeal will not lie to the supreme court from a judgment of the general term of the city court of New York affirming an interlocutory judgment without directing a final judgment as required by Code Civ. Proc. § 3191, regulating appeals to the supreme court.
    Appeal from city court of New York, general term.
    Action by Jacob Levy against the Metropolitan Street-Railway Company. From a judgment of the general term of the city court of New York (68 N. Y. Supp. 944) affirming an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to certain defenses, defendant appeals.
    Dismissed.
    Argued before BISCHOFF, P. J., and CLARKE and LEYEN-TRITT, JJ.
    Harry Melville, for appellant.
    Jacob Friedman, for respondent.
   BISCHOFF, P. J.

An appeal from an interlocutory judgment lies to, the general term (Code, § 3189), but not to the supreme court, from the determination of the general term upon that appeal, where final judgment is not directed. Code, § 3191, subd. 1; Monroe-Miller Co. v. Stokes, 9 Misc. Rep. 170, 29 N. Y. Supp. 718; Fuller v. Tuska (Com. Pl.) 17 N. Y. Supp. 356.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. All concur.  