
    15916.
    Farlow v. The State.
    Decided December 9, 1924.
    Conviction of sale of liquor; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Ho‘od. August 29, 1924.
    
      Smith & Millican, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Willis Smith, solicitor, contra.
   Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction of violating the prohibition statute. The two special grounds of the motion for a new trial, the one complaining of the court’s refusal to continue the ease, and the other based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, are without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  