
    Charles H. Tuttle, Respondent, v. Home Insurance Company, Appellant.
    (Argued May 15, 1925;
    decided June 9, 1925.)
    
      Insurance — action to recover upon policy of fire insurance covering ’ furniture in dwelling house and additions — furniture in separate building physically connected with dwelling covered.
    
    
      Tuttle v. Nome Ins. Co., 213 App. Div. 816, affirmed.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 31, 1925, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court. The action was to recover upon a policy of fire insurance insuring furniture of the assured “ while contained in the said dwelling house and additions.” The furniture destroyed was contained in a building separate from the dwelling house though physically connected therewith.
    
      Frank Sowers for appellant.
    
      Charles H. Tuttle and Martin A. Schenck for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.  