
    Matter of the Estate of Mary Chase, Deceased.
    
      (Surrogate’s Court, Saratoga County,
    
    
      May, 1903.)
    Express Trust—Words Creating One—Res Adjudicata—Surrogate May Appoint a Successor to a Deceased Testamentary Trustee.
    A devise made by a testatrix to one of her executors of “ the management and control of my real estate, with power to sell and convey same as I now possess (after my death) ” creates an express trust and vests the legal estate in the trustee, subject only to the execution of the trust.
    A decree made on a judicial settlement of the executor, adjudging that he hold the balance in his hands in trust for the beneficiary named in the will, concludes parties to the decree as to the existence of the trust and as to how the executor now holds the corpus.
    
    Code Civ. Pro., § 2818, as amended in 1903, authorizes a surrogate to appoint a successor to a deceased testamentary trustee, and therefore the Supreme Court no longer has exclusive jurisdiction in such case.
    Application to the surrogate of Saratoga county to appoint a successor to a sole testamentary trustee who has died.
    Irwin Esmond, for petitioner; Alfred A. Guthrie, for surviving executor.
   Lester, S.

Mary Chase departed this life, on or about April 7, 1901, having first made her last will and testament which was duly admitted to probate by the surrogate of the county of Saratoga on the 7th day of September, 1901.

The testatrix provided in her said will, among other things, as follows: “First. After all my lawful debts are paid and discharged, I give, devise and bequeath to my sister, Elizabeth A. Vandervort, the income of all my real estate, during her life,, if she survives me. * * * Seventh. I give, devise and bequeath to one of my executors hereinafter named, George W. Rowley, the management and control of my real estate, with power to sell and convey same as I now possess (after my death).” The testatrix also provided that, after the death of her sister, the residue and remainder of her estate should go to her nephews and nieces, named in her will, share and share-alike.

George W. Rowley assumed the management and control of the real estate mentioned in the will, ‘and exercised the power to ¡sell therein given him and, pursuant to' such power, sold all the real estate of the testatrix and converted it into money and has since died. At the time of his death the net proceeds of the real estate were represented by a bond -and mortgage given to-him as executor of the last will of Mary Chase, deceased,” and cash deposited to his credit, “ as executor of the estate of Mary Chase, deceased,” in the First National Bank of Balls-ton Spa, N. Y.

One of the nieces of the decedent, Mary Chase, who is entitled under the provisions of her will to a share of the residue-of her estate after the death of her sister, Elizabeth A. Vandervort, has applied to the surrogate of Saratoga county to appoint a successor to George W. Rowley as testamentary trustee-under such will. The surviving executor of such will, William. S1. Kertley of Albany, appears in opposition to this application,, and urges several objections which it is necessary to consider-

First. It is claimed by the surviving executor that no legal trust was created by the will; that the provisions above quoted simply conferred upon George W. Rowley certain special powers and duties which he was to perform in his capacity as executor and which now devolve upon the surviving executor. It seems clear to me that this position of the surviving executor is not justified by a correct interpretation of the will in question which gave to George W. Rowley an active duty respecting the real estate of which the testatrix died seized. It bestowed upon him, in express terms, the management and control of the real estate and gave him the power to dispose of it; and it gave to the sister of the testatrix the right to the income of the real estate during her lifetime. This provision seems to omit nothing which is required to- constitute a trust to receive the rents and profits of the real property of the testatrix and apply them to the use of her sister during her life and to appoint George W. Rowley the trustee and vest in him the legal estate under the provisions of section 80 of the Real Property Law. L. 1896, ch. 547.

Prior to the death, of George W. Rowley, he filed an account of his proceedings as executor, and presented to the Surrogate’s Court his petition for the judicial settlement thereof. William S. Kertley, his coexecutor, appeared in person and by Alfred A. Guthrie, his attorney, and such proceedings were had that, on the 17th day of February, 1903, a decree was made at a Surrogate’s Court held in and for the county of Saratoga on that day, in which, among other tMngs, it was ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said executor, George W. Rowley, hold and retain the balance remaining in his hands, namely: the sum of $1,166.72 in trust to pay the income of said balance to the said Elizabeth A. Vandervort during her lifetime and, upon her death, to pay the legacies mentioned and set forth in the last will of said deceased.

If there were any doubts -arising from a consideration of the provisions of the will, such doubts would seem to be set at rest by the provisions of this decree. The parties appearing in opposition to the present application were parties to the proceeding in which the decree was made and no appeal therefrom has been taken. This decree is an adjudication upon the question of the existence of the trust and the capacity in which the deceased trustee held the fund involved in this application.

The income which he collected, from the trust estate came into his hands as trustee and not ms executor, and formed no part of the estate over which the executors, as such, had control. Upon his death, the trust vested in the Supreme Court and the surviving executor does not succeed to his authority in respect to the trust estate.

Second. It is, therefore, necessary to appoint a successor, and the next question to be considered is whether the surrogate has power to make such appointment. It was urged by the counsel for the surviving executor, upon the argument, that the surrogate had no such power, but that the authority contained in section 2818 of the Code was repealed by the Real Property Law, passed in 1896 which provided that, upon the death of the sole trustee of an express trust, the trust, if unexecuted, should vest in the Supreme Court and be executed by some person, appointed for that purpose, under the direction of the court. It is not necessary to discuss this proposition in view of the fact that, since the passage of the Real Property Law, the Legislature of 1903 amended section 2818 of the Code and re-enacted the provisions authorizing the appointment of a successor, upon the death of a testamentary trustee, by the surrogate.

I, therefore, hold that the surrogate has power in this case to appoint a successor to George W. Rowley and, the beneficiary having been brought into court by a citation duly served upon her, it 'becomes my duty to make such appointment.

A decree may, therefore, be entered appointing William A. Mehan, Esq., of Ballston Spa, N. Y., successor to the said George W. Rowley, as trustee of the trust created by the will- of the testatrix upon his filing his official oath and executing and filing, according to law, a bond in the penal sum of $2,400. Decreed accordingly.  