
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adiel HERNANDEZ-DEL CID, a.k.a. Adiel Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-10286
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted August 16, 2017 
    
    Filed August 18, 2017
    Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for ■
    Adiel Hernandez-Del Cid, Pro Se
    Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Adiel Hernandez-Del Cid appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez-Del Cid’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with á motion to withdraw as counsel. We have provided Hernandez-Del Cid the opportunity to file a pro, se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Hernandez-Del Cid waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     