
    KUSTES, Appellant, v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    January 13, 1905.)
    Action by Ida ICustes against the Interurban Street Railway Company.
   PER CURIAM.

We think that the allegations in paragraph 4 of the complaint must be read with the allegations in paragraph 2 thereof, and the complaint as thus read states a cause of action. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted; costs to abide the event.  