
    No. 973.
    McElwee v. McElwee.
    November Term, 1880.
    January 21st, 1881.
   Motion to dismiss appeal. Decree being hied in vacation, defendant procured from plaintiff’s attorneys their admission in writing on the back of the original decree, of “ notice of filing of the within decree.” No notice of appeal was given by plaintiff within ten days after sucli admission, nor case served within thirty days thereafter. Motion to dismiss granted. Rogers v. Nash, 12 S. C. 560, followed, and Lake v. Moore, 12 S. C. 563, distinguished. Opinion

per curiam,  