
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Charles COX, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10588
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 17, 2007.
    Jeffrey Robert Haag, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymond Cox has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cox has filed a response and a request for appointment of counsel. Cox’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cox’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     