
    2013 OK 53
    Lisa G. HASSELBRING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John HOUCK, M.D., Defendant-Appellee, and John Doe, whether one or more, whose real name is unknown and Jane Doe, whether one or more, whose real name is unknown, Defendants.
    No. 109,092.
    Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
    June 27, 2013.
   ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

T1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[in any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S.Ct. Rule 1.201.

1 2 After reviewing the record in this case , THE COURT FINDS that our recent decisions in Wall v. Marouk, 2013 OK 36, 302 P.3d 775 and Douglas v. Cox Retirement Props., 2013 OK 37, 302 P.3d 789, dispose of the issues in this case.

13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial court' s dismissal of this case is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. Appellant's Motion for Oral Argument is denied.

COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J. , KAUGER, WATT, EDMONDSON, COMBS, GURICH, JJ., concur.

WINCHESTER & TAYLOR, JJ., dissent.  