
    In Re BRADLEY et al.
    (Nos. 3,627, 3,628, 3,629.)
    (Submitted February 16, 1915.
    Decided February 27, 1915.)
    [146 Pac. 944.]
    
      Habeas Corpus — Kidnaping—Information— Sufficiency.
    
    [For syllabus, see In re McDonald,, ante, p. 348.]
    In the Matter of the applications of Joseph Bradley, Owen Smith and William Winchester, for writs of habeas corpus.
    
    Writs denied, and complainants remanded.
    
      Mr. I. G. Denny and Messrs. Maury, Templeman & Davies, for Complainants.
    
      Mr. D. M. Kelly, Attorney General, and Mr. C. S. Wagner, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BRANTLY

delivered the opinion of the court.

Habeas corpus. In these cases the question , presented is identical with that presented in the ease of In re McDonald, ante, p. 348, 146 Pac. 942. Upon the authority of that case the several writs are discharged, and the complainants are remanded to the custody of the warden of the state prison.

Mr. Justice Sanner and Mr. Justice Holloway concur.  