
    UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Moses Wayne VANPELT, Appellant.
    No. 07-3784.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 2, 2009.
    Filed: March 5, 2009.
    Shawn Wehde, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sioux City, IA, for Appellee.
    Jay Elliott Denne, Munger & Reinsch-midt, Sioux City, IA, for Appellant.
    Moses Wayne Vanpelt, Greenville, IL, pro se.
    Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Moses Wayne Vanpelt pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846 (Count I), and to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B) (Count II), which subjected him to mandatory minimum prison terms of 20 years on Count I and 10 years on Count II, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), (B) and 851. At sentencing, the district court determined an advisory Guidelines imprisonment range of 240-262 months; granted the government’s motion for a substantial-assistance reduction under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e); and sentenced Vanpelt to concurrent prison terms of 168 months. On appeal, Van-pelt asserts the district court felt constrained by then-controlling Eighth Circuit law — that extraordinary circumstances were required to justify extraordinary sentence reductions. He argues his case should be remanded for the district court to exercise its full discretion in light of Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38,-- -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 594-95, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (rejecting extraordinary-circumstances test). We disagree. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court selected the sentence it wanted to impose, notwithstanding then-controlling Eighth Circuit law. See United States v. Greene, 513 F.3d 904, 907-08 (8th Cir.2008) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. 
      
      . The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
     