
    Amiel DABUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-3794.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Oct. 25, 2012.
    Amiel Dabush, pro se, Weston, CT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Daniel J. Krisch, John B. Farley, and Jeffrey F. Gostyla, Halloran & Sage LLP, Hartford, CT, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Present: AMALYA L. KEARSE, ROBERT A. KATZMANN and BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Appellant Amiel Dabush, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his claim brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment with the view that “[sjummary judgment is appropriate only if the moving party shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003).

Upon such review, we conclude that Da-bush’s appeal is without merit substantially for the reasons articulated by the district court in its well-reasoned order. See Dabush v. The Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., No. 10-cv-67 (D.Conn. Aug. 15, 2011). We have considered Dabush’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.  