
    ISAAC W. COLES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MIDLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued June 23, 1902
    Decided November 17, 1902.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, F. Ambler Armstrong.
    
    For the defendant in error, David J. Pancoast.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in his opinion in that court, reported as Coles v. Midland Telephone and Telegraph Co. 38 Vroom 490.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Yan Syckel, Collins, Fort, Garretson,_ Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Yredenburgh, Yoori-iees, Yroom. 12.

For reversal—None.  