
    Commonwealth v. Kreinbrook, Appellant.
    
      Appeals — Statement of question involved — Assignments of error — Quashing appeal.
    
    An appeal will be quashed where the paper-boolc of the appellant contains neither statement of question involved nor assignments of error.
    Argued Dee. 1, 1902.
    December 1, 1903:
    Appeal, No. 54, April T., 1903, by plaintiff, from judgment of Q. S. Westmoreland Co., May T., 1902, No. 94, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. L. N. Kreinbrook.
    Before Beaver, Orlady, Smith, W. W. Porter and W. D. Porter, JJ.
    Appeal quashed.
    Indictment for selling liquor without a license.'
    The appellant’s paper-book contained no statement of question involved nor assignments of error.
    
      S. A. Cline, with him John B. Keenan, for appellant.
    
      J. JE. B. Cunningham, district attorney, Joseph A. Me Curdy and Ralph B. Hurst, with him, for appellee.
   Per Curiam,

Appeal quashed at bar.  