
    Charles F. Knapp v. Gaston Teyssier, Appellant.
    
      Argued April 19, 1929.
    Before Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham and Baldrige, JJ.
    
      
      F. C. McGirr, and with him John P. Egan, for appellant.
    Where the pleadings are amended the surprised party is entitled to a continuance: 2 Troubat & ITaly’s Practice, page 490, section 2206; Alexander v. Hoffman, 5 W. & S. 382.
    
      Ernest Frey, and with him B. A. Balph and James Balph, for appellee.
    Where the plaintiff sues on quantum meriut for his services he is not limited to the contract price: Witten v. Stout, 284 Pa. 410, 412; Philadelphia v. Tripple, 230 Pa. 480.
    April 29, 1929:
   Per Curiam,

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge of the lower court.  