
    The People of the State of New York ex rel. Commissioner of Public Charities of the City of New York, on Behalf of Fannie Mendelovich, Respondent, v. Nathan Abrahams, Appellant.
    
      Costs of an appeal from, an order of the Court of Special Sessions in a bastardy ease — taxation thereof on its reversal.
    
    "Where, upon an appeal to the Appellate Division from an order made by a Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York adjudging the appellant to be the father of an illegitimate child, the Appellate Division vacates the judgment with costs and orders a new trial, the appellant, under section 873 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is entitled to tax the costs of the appeal immediately and is not obliged to await the event of the new trial.
    . Appeal by the defendant, Nathan Abrahams, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of January, 1905, denying the defendant’s motion to compel the taxation of costs.
    
      Henry Morris Haviland, for the appellant.
    
      Herman Stiefel, for the respondent.
   McLaughlin, J.:

The defendant, on the 20th of May, 1903, was adjudged by the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York to be the father of a bastard child born to one Fannie Mendelovich. Upon appeal to this court the order was vacated, with costs, and a new trial ordered. (People ex rel. Mendelovich v. Abrahams, 96 App. Div. 27.) The clerk refused to tax the costs upon the ground that, inasmuch as the new trial had not been had, the proceeding was not determined. A motion was thereupon made to compel the taxation of costs, which was denied, and defendant appeals.

I am of opinion that the motion should have been granted to the extent of taxing the costs of the appeal to this court. The Code of Criminal Procedure (§ 873) provides as follows: “ The court must award costs to the party in whose favor an appeal is determined. * * * In the city of New York, when costs are awarded upon an appeal to the person charged as the father or mother of the bastard, they must, upon the production of similar vouchers, be paid by the comptroller of that city and charged to the appropriation made to the commissioners of charities and corrections thereof.” It will be observed that, by the express language of the section, the award of costs is not discretionary, but the court is required to grant the same to the successful party, and such award in no way depends upon the final determination of the proceeding. The costs referred to in this section are the costs of the appeal and nothing else. It was in pursuance of this section that the order reversing the order of the Court of Special Sessions and ordering a new trial awarded costs to the defendant, he having been successful upon the appeal. The award having been made, he was entitled to have the same taxed, and this irrespective of whether or not the new trial directed had taken place. The proceeding is a quasi criminal one, and the costs of the appeal are given as a matter of right as soon as the ■appeal is determined.

The order appealed from, therefore, must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

O’Brien, P. J., Patterson, Ingbaham and Laughlin, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.  