
    Underwood v. The State.
    Argued November 17,
    Decided December 9, 1902.
   Candler, J.

The charge complained of was not, for any reason assigned in the motion for a new trial, erroneous; the evidence warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Accusation of selling liquor. Before Judge Crisp. City court of Aruericus. September 11, 1902.

J. H. Lumpkin, for plaintiff in error.  