
    Ronald BRADLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William G. MILLIKEN et al., Defendants-Appellants. Ronald BRADLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, etc., Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 72-1064 to 72-1066.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Feb. 23, 1972.
    Certiorari Denied Oet. 10, 1972.
    See 93 S.Ct. 45.
    George T. Roumell, Jr., Louis D. Beer, Riley & Roumell, Detroit, Mich., for defendants-appellants.
    William E. Caldwell, Ratner, Sugarmon & Lucas, Memphis, Tenn., Nathaniel R. Jones, New York City, E. Winther McCroom, Cincinnati, Ohio, Jack Green-berg, Norman J. Chachkin, New York City, J. Harold Flannery, Paul R. Dimond, Robert Pressman, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., for plaintiffs-appellees.
    Theodore Sachs, Detroit, Mich., for intervenors Detroit Federation of Teachers.
    Before CELEBREZZE, McCREE and KENT, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

These are appeals from an order entered on November 5,1971, following a “pretrial conference” held on October 4, 1971. The order from which these appeals are taken requires the parties to submit proposed plans for desegregation of the Detroit schools within a stipulated period of time which time had not passed at the time the appeals were filed. The order in question is not a final order within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1291, neither is it an interlocutory order or decree which may be appealed to this Court under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a).

No party to the action has sought a certificate from the District Court or from this Court for an interlocutory appeal under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).- There being no final order from which an appeal may be taken, and the cross-appellants having agreed that their appeal may be dismissed with the original appeal,

It is ordered that the motions to dismiss the appeals be granted.  