
    Hans Rushfeldt vs. Walter Shave and another.
    July 25, 1887.
    Appeal — Assignment of Error. — Rule 9 (amended) requires the appellant-to make an assignment of errors.
    Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Clay county, where the action was tried before Collins, J., without a jury.. 0. Mosness, for appellant.
    
      Edwin Adams, for respondent.
   By the Court.

The appellant has not presented an assignment of' errors, as required by our amended rule 9, adopted at the October-term, 1885, and published in 33 Minn, xix, (25 N. W. Rep. iii.) The judgment is therefore affirmed.  