
    Filed March 16, 1894.
    Bowman, Thompson & Co., Limited, Resp’t, v. Joseph F. Fuerst, App’lt.
    
      I. M. Diltenhoeffer, for app’lt; James Dunne, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam.

For the reasons expressed in the case of Bowman, Thompson & Co. v. Fuerst, 59 St. Rep.-, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.  