
    GPX INTERNATIONAL TIRE CORPORATION and Hebei Starbright Tire Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, and Titan Tire Corporation and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, Defendants-Appellants, and Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.
    Nos. 2011-1107, 2011-1108, 2011-1109.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    May 17, 2011.
    Daniel L. Porter, William H. Barringer, James P. Durling, Gene C. Schaerr, Matthew Paul McCullough, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, Francis J. Sailer, Mark E. Pardo, Andrew T. Schütz, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    Michael D. Panzera, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Wesley K. Caine, Terence P. Stewart, Elizabeth J. Drake, Stewart & Stewart, Washington, DC, Joseph W. Dorn, Jeffrey M. Telep, Ashley C. Parrish, J. Michael Taylor, Christopher Todd Cloutier, P. Lee Smith Jr., King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellants.
    Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
   ON MOTION

ORDER

The Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws, Nucor Corporation, Maverick Tube Corporation, and Aabama Metal Industries Corporation move to file a brief amicus curiae in support of the defendants-appellants. Titan Tire Corporation and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Alied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC (collectively “Titan”) move to file a separate response brief in response to the United States’ brief on the issue of countervailing duty cut-off date. The United States opposes.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.

(2) Titan’s motion is granted to the limited extent that it may include the arguments in its reply brief. The separate response brief is rejected. A corrected reply brief, including the arguments Titan wishes to make concerning the cut-off date, may be filed within 14 days of the date of filing of this order.  