
    [S. F. No. 14424.
    In Bank.
    October 8, 1931.]
    GRACE TAKATA, Petitioner, v. RAY L. RILEY, as State Controller, etc., Respondent.
    
      Sullivan, Roche, Johnson & Barry and Broheeh, Phleger & Harrison for Petitioner.
    U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Ralph O. Marrón, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
   THE COURT.

At the close of oral argument the chief justice announced the decision of the court as follows:

The question involved is not new. We have examined it a great many times. On the authority of Estate of Wellings, 192 Cal. 506, 519 [221 Pac. 628], Heron v. Riley, 209 Cal. 507 [289 Pac. 160], Frank v. Maguire, 201 Cal. 414 [257 Pac. 515], Buelke v. Levenstadt, 190 Cal. 684 [214 Pac. 42], and cases referred to therein, we are of the view that the title of this act is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution. The writ will issue.  