
    Blevins v. Commonwealth.
    (Decided October 1, 1926.)
    Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court.
    Criminal Law. — Submission of question of defendant’s guilt for second violation of Rash-Gullion Act held error, in absence of proof that first offense was committed after act became operative.
    W. J. WARD for appellant-.
    FRANK E. DAUGHERTY, Attorney General, for appellee.
   Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

Reversing.

Appellant was tried and convicted under an indictment charging him with a second violation of the RashGullion Act (1922 Acts, chapter. 33) and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year. The indictment charges him with the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors on September 8, 1925, and a previous conviction for the same offense at the' January term, 1924, of the Johnson circuit court. The indictment undiar' which he was convicted for the first offense was returned on February 2,1923, and the proof for the Commonwealth fails to disclose when that offense was committed. It might have béen committed before March 22, 1922, the date when the Rash-Gullion Act became operative. The instructions given required the jury to believe that it had been committed after that date, but no proof was introduced to authorize the giving of such an instruction. The lower court, therefore, erred in submitting to the jury the question of appellant’s guilt on the charge of a second violation of the act. Blanton v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky. 571, 276 S. W. 533.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.  