
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby V. MOON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-30348.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 14, 2009.
    
    July 27, 2009.
    Anthony G. Hall, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Nicolas Vernon Vieth, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders Eastern Washington and Idaho, Pocatello, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Bobby V. Moon appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of sexually explicit images of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Moon contends that the district court erred by applying a five-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(7)(D) because the evidence was insufficient to find that he possessed 600 or more images. In light of Moon’s stipulation to the fact that he possessed 600 or more images, the district court did not err. See United, States v. Ferreboeuf, 632 F.2d 832, 836 (9th Cir.1980).

To the extent Moon contends that the district court should have used the clear and convincing evidence standard in determining the number of images, his stipulation to 600 or more images is sufficient to meet this standard of proof. See id.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     