
    Before the Second Division,
    September 14, 1938
    No. 39350.
    Protest 105409-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Embroidered articles in part of lace similar to the merchandise involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and embroidered silk veils and trimmings like the merchandise the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.  