
    Raffaele Cascone & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Appellant.
    
      Insurance — action upon contract of fire insurance — defense that insured was not the sole and unconditional owner of property.
    
    
      Cascone & Co., Inc., v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co., 189 App. Div. 915, affirmed.
    (Argued October 20, 1921;
    decided November 22, 1921.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 17, 1919, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The action was to recover upon a policy of fire insurance. The defense was that plaintiff was not the sole and unconditional owner of the property.
    
      Leopold Minkin and S. J. Rosenblum for appellant.
    
      Edward J. Reilly for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: His cock, Ch. J.  