
    The Bank of Columbia v. Ott’s Administrators.
    The title of the cause written in the margin of a plea'is no part of theplea,butis only an intimation to the clerk in what cause he is to enter the plea; and a mistake, in the name of one of the parties in the cause, made in the marginal title, is not fatal to the plea, even upon special demurrer.
    The defendants pleaded the statute of limitations. The name of the plaintiffs, in the margin, or at the head of the plea, was “ The President and Directors of- the Bank of Columbia; ” whereas the corporate name of the plaintiffs was “ The President, Directors, and Company of the Bank of Columbia.” The plaintiffs demurred specially to the plea, and assigned the same cause of demurrer as in the case of the same plaintiffs against Richard Jones, at the present term, {ante, 516.)
    
      Mr. Marbury, for the defendant,
    notwithstanding the decision of the Court in that case, was permitted to argue the point again. He contended that the names of the parties in the margin do not constitute any part of the plea. 1 Chitty, 528; Dale v. Baer, 7 East, 333; Dyer v. Stevens, 6 Mass. Rep. 389. -
    
      Messrs. Key & Dunlop, contra,
    
    cited 1 Chitty, 527, 528, 645, 656 ; Roberts v. Moon, 5 T. R. 487.
   The CouRT

(Thruston, J. contra,')

decided that the plea was good, considering the titling as no part of the plea, but an indication to the clerk in what cause he is to enter the plea; overruling the case of The Bank of Columbia v. Tones, at this term, [ante, 516.]  