
    NORTHWEST THRESHER CO. v. MINIUM.
    No. 3451.
    Opinion Filed May 12, 1914.
    (141 Pac. 5.)
    ACTION ON NOTES. For syllabus, see Northwest Thresher Co. v. McNinch, ante, 140 Pae. 1170.
    (Syllabus by Bittenhouse, C.)
    
      Error from District Court, Canadian County; John J. Carney, Judge.
    
    Action by the Northwest Thresher Company against John Minium. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
    Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
    
      M. D. Libby, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Jas. L. Brown and Floyd Wheeler, for defendant in error. •
   Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This action was begun' in the district court of Canadian county on a promissory note for $75, given as collateral security to an indebtedness of J. R. McClung. On the 13th day of June, 1910, there was filed in said cause a stipulation in the case of Northwest Thresher Co. v. McNinch, ante, 140 Pac. 1170, wherein' it was provided:

“Third. If appeal be taken to the Supreme Court from the final judgment in any or all said actions, by either party, in-’ eluding the final judgment in the said action wherein the said-W. E. McNinch is defendant, then briefs shall be filed in that action only wherein the said W. E. McNinch 'is a party to the. appeal, and the judgment, order, or mandate ,of the Supreme Court in the latter action shall be the judgment, order, or mandate of that court in each of the said other appealed actions.
“Fourth. It is not intended hereby to consolidate said actions for trial, but merely that the trial and judgment in the one case in the district court, or upon appeal to the Supreme Court, shall furnish the rule for judgment in each of the other cases pending in such court.”

Following the rule advanced in the case of Northwest Thresher Co. v. McNinch, supra, the above cause is reversed and remanded, with instructions to the trial .court to render judgment against John Minium in favor of the Northwest Thresher Company in the sum of $75, with interest at 8 per cent, per annum from July 15, 1905, and costs.

By the Court: It is so ordered..  