
    Paul MILLER, Respondent/Appellant, v. Bethany J. MILLER, Petitioner/Respondent.
    No. 71278.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Six.
    Nov. 4, 1997.
    Stephen J. Nangle, Nangle & Nangle, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent/appellant.
    Nathan S. Cohen, Lacks, Newman & Cohen, P.C., Clayton, for petitioner/respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from a default judgment granting wife a divorce decree, child support, and a division of property. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  