
    Palm, Fechteler & Company, Respondent, v. Frank Fechteler and Another, Appellants.
    Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
   Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ., dissented on the ground that it was error to exclude defendant from proving the expenses involved in making the profit which was charged.  