
    16803.
    Yesbik v. The State.
    Decided November 11, 1925.
    Conviction of possessing intoxicating liquor; from Kandolph superior court—Judge Yeomans. August 18, 1925.
    
      Linton B. West, C. W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Castellóni, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, B. C. Hill, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

In addition to the circumstantial evidence, there was sufficient direct evidence to support the verdict of guilty; the verdict is approved by the trial judge, and, as no error of law appears, the

judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., eoneur.  