
    Robert L. Harrison, Resp’t., v. The Vermont Manganese Co., App’lt.
    
      (City Court of New York, General Term,
    
    
      Filed December 7, 1892.)
    
    Corporations—Services performed at request of incorporators.
    Some time after the charter of defendant was granted plaintiff was requested by some of the incorporators to call a meeting of the shareholders for the purpose of organization and election of officers, which he accordingly did. Held, that the services so performed being for the benefit of the company and having been accepted by its incorporators on the authority of its officers, it was liable therefor.
    Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.
    
      R. H. Smith, for app’lt; R. L. Harrison, for resp’t
   McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal frorii a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $276.78 and is for services claimed to have been performed by the plaintiff in the month of September, 1889, for the defendant.

The defendant’s organization sprang into existence in March or April, 1889, that being the date of the charter under which the incorporators met.

The purposes of the organization are fully set out in the evidence. Among its incorporators were W. W. Flanagan (who was also connected with another company), a Mr. Russell P. Hoyt, who was elected its president shortly after the first meeting of the incorporators, and a James Grwatkin, another incorporator, who was secretary.

About August 27, 1889, at the request of some of these incorporators, the plaintiff was directed to call, a meeting of the shareholders of the defendant, which was done by the plaintiff, and such meeting took place on September 16, 1889, and the organization then, so far as the election of its officers and the performance of some other routine business, was completed.

Defendant had, from the time of the granting of the charter, become a corporation for all intents and purposes. Its incorporators would be liable from that time for all acts, whether it had a president or other officer.

The officers are only the medium through which it acts, and the incorporators could delegate its power to any of its members or require all to act together.

The services performed were clearly for the benefit of the defendant, and were accepted by its incorporators. 30 N. Y, 83.

It was on the authority of all the officers.

The defendant having, by its motion to dismiss at the close of the case, left the matter with the court, and the plaintiff thereupon having moved for a direction in his favor, the question became one of fact for the court.,

V From the evidence in the case, we find no error, and think the judgment was properly rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and, therefore, should be affirmed, with costs.

McGown and Van Wyck, JJ., concur.  