
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliverio Alonso ESTRADA-LEMUS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-10198.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.
    
    Decided March 9, 2011.
    An Nguyen, Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, South Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Rene Valladares, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Oliverio Alonso Estrada-Lemus appeals from the 86-month sentence imposed following his conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Estrada-Lemus contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the age of his prior conviction under United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir.2009), and because he is unlikely to reoffend. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir.2010) (emphasizing the limited scope of Amezcua-Vasquez).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     