
    Bernard J. Ludwig et al., Respondents, v. Rolland E. Gove, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York
    General Term,
    October, 1895.)
    An appeal will not lie fromT'an order sustaining a demurrer, to an answer with leave to amend.
    Appeal from order sustaining demurrer to answer,, with leave to amend.
    
      
      Fellowes & Wright, for appellant.
    ■ Wager & Acker, for respondents.
   Fitzsimons, J.

The plaintiffs demurred to the defendant’s answer. The demurrer, was sustained, with leave to the defendant to amend his answer. An order to that effect was-entered. From such order this appeal is taken. .

The appeal must he dismissed because, from the order entered herein, no appeal lies. Denslow v. Bush, 9 Misc. Rep. 337.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Yan 'Wyck, Oh. J.,. concurs. .

Appeal dismissed, with costs.  