
    STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John TODD, Defendant/Appellant. John TODD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 62526, 63983.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 22, 1994.
    S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    
      Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).  