
    SPAULDING MFG. CO. v. WITTER et al.
    
    No. 2054.
    Opinion Filed July 18, 1912.
    (125 Pac. 729.)
    FORMER, DECISION FOLLOWED. The syllabus in this ease is the same as the syllabus in Spaulding Manufacturing Co. v. Roff, ante, 125 Pae. 727.
    (Syllabus by Rosser, 0.)
    
      Error from Coal County Court; R. H. Wells, Judge.
    
    Action by the Spaulding Manufacturing Company against C. M. Witter, D. A. Wooly, and J. C. Thomas. From a judgment refusing to permit plaintiff to amend his petition, and refusing to permit him to amend an appeal bond and dismissing appeal, plaintiff brings error.
    Reversed and remanded.
    
      G. T. Ralls, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Fooshee & Brunson,. for defendants in error.
   Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The record, in this- case is, in all respects, identical with the record in Spaulding Manufacturing Co. v. Roff et al., ante, 125 Pac. 727, by Brewer, C., except as to the name of the defendants. Upon the authority of that case, this case must be reversed and remanded for further proceedings, not inconsistent with the opinion in that case.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  