
    STIEGLITZ, Respondent, v. BELDING, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    April 1, 1897.)
    Action by Louis Stieglitz against Milo M. Belding, Jr.
    Lexow, Mackellar & Wells, for appellant.
    Cardoza & Nathan, for respondent.
   FITZSIMONS, P. J.

The demurrer was properly sustained. Knorr v. Bates, 12 Misc. Rep. 396, 33 N. Y. Supp. 691; Id., 14 Misc. Rep. 501, 35 N. Y. Supp. 1060; Ralli v. Hillyer, 15 Misc. Rep. 692, 40 N. Y. Supp. 1148. The order and judgment appealed from are therefore affirmed, with costs to the respondent.  