
    Herbert Marion MONROSE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al., Respondents.
    No. 35545.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 5, 1966.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1966.
    Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg & Rogers and Carr & Schuh, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.
    Rodney Durrance and John McQuigg, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commisssion bearing date May 19, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. ■

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.  