
    S. H. Kress & Co. v. United States
    No. 5810.
    Invoice dated Sonneberg, Germany, September 24, 1937.
    Certified September 28, 1937.
    Entered at New York, N. Y., Noveinber 1, 1937.
    Entry No. 764945.
    (Decided February 8, 1943)
    
      Sharretts & Hillis (Arthur L. Tollman of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Cole, Judge:

This appeal to reappraisement brings for determination the proper dutiable values of certain Christmas-tree ornaments exported from Sonneberg, Germany, and imported at the port of New York.

The case was submitted for decision on December 30, 1942, on a stipulation wherein the parties agree that—

the glass Christmas-tree ornaments on the invoices covered by the reappraisement appeal * * * exported from Germany in September 1937, and the per se unit invoice prices therefor and the market conditions with respect thereto, are the same in all material respects as the glass Christmas-tree ornaments, the per se unit invoice prices therefor and the market conditions with respect thereto, in the case of F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States, Reappraisement Decision 6094, * * * the record in said R. D. 5094 may be and hereby is incorporated as a part of the record in the reappraisement * * *.

In the Woolworth case, supra, the question before the court was whether the cash prices of people in the Sonneberg-Lauscha district of Germany manufacturing'Christmas-tree ornaments, cocktail sticks, and other glass novelties in their homes, represented the proper dutiable value of the merchandise; or whether higher prices charged by commissionaires or dealers was the proper basis for appraisement. The court found that the manufacturers’ prices met all of the requirements of statutory value as defined in section 402 (c) and (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and accordingly held such values to be the proper ones for tariff purposes.

Acquiescing in the above agreement, the court finds that there existed for the Christmas-tree ornaments in question, at the time of exportation thereof, a foreign value and an export value as they are defined in said section 402, and accordingly holds that such duitable values are the per se unit invoice prices, plus, when not included in such per se unit invoice prices, the costs of cases and packing and the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, as invoiced, whenever reported as dutiable by the appraiser.

The appeal, having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, is hereby dismissed so far as it relates thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.  