
    259 So.2d 921
    Burrell DULANEY v. Luke FRUGE et al.
    No. 52326.
    April 11, 1972.
   The result is correct.

DIXON, J.,

concurs in the denial, being of the opinion that the judgment is probably correct because the plaintiff, himself, appears to have been a supervisory employee charged with the same duties he claims were violated by defendants; nevertheless, it appears that the reasons for the judgment complained of, given by the majority, are incorrect.  