
    Hale v. Hammond.
    Submitted April 14,
    Decided May 6, 1897.
    Complaint on notes. Before Judge Henry. Walker superior court. February term, 1896.
    
      Copeland & Jackson and R. M. W. Glenn, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Lumpkin & Shattuck, contra.
   Fish, J.

This case involves no new legal question; the charges complained of were correct presentations of the law applicable to the issues involved; there was no error at the trial; the evidence, though in many respects conflicting, fully warranted the verdict rendered, and there was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.  