
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David A. HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-7717
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 14, 2017
    Decided: July 20, 2017
    David A. Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Betty Adkins Pullin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions áre not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Hicks appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to destroy evidence. The motion was granted in accordance with the district court’s local rules, and Hicks offers no evidence to support his claim that the exhibits support a claim of actual innocence. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of the Government’s motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  