
    Harris v. The State.
    Submitted June 20
    Decided August 1, 1905.
    Indictment for profane language in presence of female. Before Judge Burch. City court of Dublin. April 24, 1905.
    
      Howard & Baker, for plaintiff in error.’
    
      G. H. Williams, solicitor, contra.
   Cobb, J.

The only special assignment of error in the motion for a new trial being upon the admission of evidence, and it not appearing from the motion what objection was made thereto at the time the same was offered, the assignment of error can not be considered. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, O. J., absent.  