
    NICK SCAGLIONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
    9 So. (2nd) 97
    Division B
    June 30, 1942
    Rehearing Denied July 20, 1942
    
      Cyrus W. Fields, for appellant.
    J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, Millard B. Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, and Woodrow M. Melvin, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
   TERRELL, J.:

Appellant, was convicted for conducting a lottery contrary to the Laws of Florida. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the information, the failure of the Court to give charges with reference to the evidence of “spotters” and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The sufficiency of the information is concluded by Collier v. State, 116 Fla. 703, 156 So. 703, the challenge as to the charges is concluded by Section 215 (4) Criminal Procedure Act and the challenge as to the suffiieency of the evidence is concluded by La Barbara v. State, opinion filed May 29, 1942, not yet reported.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.  