
    F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States
    No. 6051.
    Invoices dated Sonneberg, Germany, September 7, 1939, etc.
    Certified September 9, 1939, etc.
    Entered at Baltimore, Md., October 2, 1939, etc.
    Entry No. 1179, etc.
    (Decided September 6, 1944)
    
      Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney) for the defendant.
   Kincheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the cases listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respects the same as the facts and' circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the-invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reap-praisements 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of F. W. Woolworth Co. and' passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in United States v. S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co., 26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”
It is further stipulated and agreed, that on the dates of exportation of the-merchandise involved in the cases listed in the annexed schedule, identified on-the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual' wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the per se unit invoice prices, plus 3}{ per centum social assessments for insurance, 'vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.
As to all other items, the appeals are abandoned.
It is further stipulated and agreed, that the record in United States v. S. S. Kresge Co. et al., 26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeals to reappraisement are submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the-invoices by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR, of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, and that such values are the per se unit invoice prices, plus 3% per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.  