
    Duenkel (Fred), Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.
    
      March 11
    
    April 5, 1932.
    
    
      
      L. P. Fox of Chilton, for the plaintiff in error.
    For the defendant in error there was a brief by the Attorney General and I. E. Messer schmidt, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Messer schmidt.
    
   Fairchild, J.

The facts and questions of law in this case are identical with those considered in the case of Leonard Duenkel v. State, decided herewith (ante, p. 644, 242 N. W. 179), and are ruled by the decision there made, wherein it was held that the judgment was properly entered and the motion fór a new trial properly denied.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.  