
    OGBURN v. LOOP LAND & IRRIGATION CO. et al.
    (No. 825.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.
    March 28, 1918.)
    Appeal and Error <&wkey;>123 — Judgments Ap-pealable — “Final Judgment.”
    A judgment merely finding the facts and conclusions of law without pronouncing the legal consequences of the facts found is not a final judgment, and is not appealable.
    [Ed. Note. — For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Final Decree or Judgment.]
    Appeal from District Court, Ward County; Chas. Gibbs, Judge.
    Action between J. W. Ogburn and the Loop Land & Irrigation Company and others. From the judgment rendered, Ogburn appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Starley & Carson, of Barstow, for appellant. B. W. Baker, of Barstow, for appellees.
   HARPER, C. J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract of sale of land. According to the transcript, the following is a description of what is termed “judgment entered.” It recites:

“Be it remembered that upon this, the 13th day of June, 1917, the above styled and numbered cause came on for trial, and, after considering the evidence offered, the court finds that the following facts have been established:
[Then follows a copy of the findings of facts and conclusions of law appearing upon other pages of the transcript.]”

There is no declaration of the court pronouncing the legal consequences of the facts-found, without which there is no final judgment such as to give this court jurisdiction-to ..consider and determine the questions involved. The appeal must therefore be dismissed at cost of appellant. Trammell v. Rosen, 106 Tex. 132, 157 S. W. 1161.

Dismissed. 
      <§ss>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     