
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Myles Stanley JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10077.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00230-LRH.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 23, 2004.
    Margaret M. Starfish, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Leo P. Flangas, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Myles Stanley Jackson, pro se, North Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Myles Stanley Jackson appeals the 63-month sentence imposed following his conviction by jury trial of 8 counts of conspiraey, mail fraud, wire fraud and bank fraud. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We review for plain error, see United States v. Riley, 335 F.3d 919, 925 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

Jackson contends that the district court erred by applying a two-level sentence enhancement for an offense involving “sophisticated means” because he was only a low-level participant in the fraud scheme. We need not decide whether U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(8)(C) includes an exception for low-level participants because the record contains sufficient evidence that Jackson was personally involved in complex aspects of this undisputedly sophisticated scheme. See U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, cmt. n. 6 (B) (2002); United States v. Aragbaye, 234 F.3d 1101, 1108 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, the district court did not plainly error by applying the enhancement.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     