
    DRISCOLL, Respondent, v. SHIELDS, Appellant.
    (No. 1,412.)
    (Submitted May 5, 1902.
    Decided May 5, 1902.)
    
      Appeal — Rules of the Supreme (Jourl — Defective Brief— Dismissal.
    
    An appeal wherein the appellant’s brief contains no assignment of the errors relied on, as is required by Subdivision “b” of Rule X of the Supreme Court, will be dismissed on' respondent’s motion.
    
      Appeal from District Court, Silver Boto County; John Lindsay, Judge.
    
    ActioN by Dennis Driscoll against Dan Shields. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Dismissed.
    
      Mr. J. L. Wines, for Appellant.
    
      Messrs. Mediation & Goiter, for Respondent.
   HR. CI-IIEE JUSTICE RRANTLY

delivered the opinion of the court..

Appeal by defendant from a judgment and an order denying him a new trial. At the hearing this day a motion is submitted asking that the appeal be dismissed for the reason, among others, that appellant’s brief filed in this court contains no assignment of the errors upon which he relies, as» is required by Subdivision “b” of Rule X of this court. Upon inspection of the brief, we find it wholly lacking in the particular mentioned. Upon the authority of Patterson v. Pfouts, 25 Mont. 163, 64 Pac. 222, and other cases, the motion must be sustained.

Dismissed.  