
    Clarence M. Bradeen vs. Charles C. Fowler et al.
    Waldo County.
    Decided December 27, 1928.
    
      Buzzell (§• Thornton, for plaintiff.
    
      Ross St. Germain, for defendant.
   In a case like this, involving only issues of fact, an extended opinion with discussion of reasons would have no value as a precedent. It is sufficient to say that the Court perceives no manifest error in the verdict of the jury. Motion overruled.  