
    SCHWARTZ, Respondent, v. HOOKER ELECTRO CHEMICAL CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 26, 1913.)
    Action by Julius Schwartz against the Hooker ElectroChemical Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order modified, "so as to permit plaintiff to have an inspection of the machine on which he was injured, and its several parts, on condition that plaintiff pay to-defendant the expense of employing a machinist from the shops where said machine was made to take down the machine, and after the inspection to set it up again, also modified as-to provisions as to photographs and models, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Settle order before ' Mr. Justice Foote on two days’ notice.  