
    WEIL, Respondent, v. F. I. A. T., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    May 1, 1914.)
    Action by Harry Weil, by Carl Well, his guardian ad litem, against F. I. A. T.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence both as to negligence and the extent and gravity of plainti~'s injuries was conflicting, and therefore the jury were to determine the credibility and weight to be given to this testimony. As there was evidence to sustain their verdict, and appellant's exceptions to the rulipgs of the

court below present no error, we find no ground to interfere with the verdict and the judgment entered thereon.  