
    Charles Ketcham, Respondent, v. James Stewart and Alexander M. Stewart, Appellants.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the defendants, having objected to the evidence as to the cost of repairs and having obtained a ruling in their own favor, cannot be heard to insist upon a reversal because the like evidence when offered by them was excluded. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence of the reasonable cost of repairs to the boat was improperly excluded.  