
    DICKEY, Co. Treas., et al. v. STATE ex rel. CITY OF COLLINSVILLE.
    No. 14137
    Opinion Filed June 26, 1923.
    (Syllabus.)
    Statutes — Enactment — “Revenue Bill’ — Act Authorizing Municipality to Raise Revenue — Costs in Mandamus.
    The syliabus in this case is the same as adapted in the case of Dickey, County Treasurer, v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. City of Tulsa, No. 14136, in which opinion was this day filed. (90 Okla. 106, 217 Pae. 145.)
    Error from District Court, Tulsa County; W. B. Williams, Judge.
    Mandamus by the State, on the relation of the City of Collinsville, against Wayne L. Dickey, County Treasurer, and another. Judgment for relator, and respondents bring error.
    Affirmed.
    John M. Goldesberry, Co. Atty., and James Harrington, Asst. Co. Atty., for plaintiffs In error.
    P. L. Long, for defendants in error.
   COCHRAN, J.

On January 20, 1923, the city of Collinsville instituted a proceeding in mandamus against the county treasurer of Tulsa county to compel such county treasurer to pay to the city of Collinsville penalties on delinquent ad valorem taxes collected on property located within the city of Col-linsville. Upon the trial of the case, a peremptory writ of mandamus was issued according to the prayer of the petition. From this judgment, the county treasurer has appealed.

The questions involved in this case are identical with those involved in the case of Dickey, County Treasurer, v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. City of Tulsa, No. 14136, 90 Okla. 106, 217 Pac. 145, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and McNEILL, NICHOLSON, and MASON, J.T., concur.  