
    Arnold v. The State.
    Argued June 15,—
    Decided June 25, 1903.
    Accusation of gaining. Before Judge Hollingsworth. City court of Fayetteville. May 2, 1903.
    
      J. W. Wise, for plaintiff in error.
    
      A. O. Blalock, solicitor, and E. E. Spurlin, contra.
   Lamar, J.

In a prosecution for gambling it is sufficient to show that the defendant, with others, played at cards for money, without proof of the character of the game, or which of the players lost or won.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.  