
    In re 1984 Saab Automobile.
    [Cite as In re 1984 Saab Auto. (1991), 58 Ohio St. 3d 605.]
    (No. 90-587
    Submitted February 6, 1991
    Decided March 18, 1991.)
    
      Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and William E. Breyer, for appellant.
    
      Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, and Kim Wilson Burke, for appellee.
    
      Darrell L. Heckman, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys’ Association.
    
      Donald W. White, prosecuting attorney, and David H. Hoffmann, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Clermont County Prosecutor’s office.
   This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports and that it may be cited only in Hamilton County as persuasive precedent of the First Appellate District.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.  