
    MERCY HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v. Willis E. RODGERS et al., Respondents.
    No. 75-159.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 24, 1975.
    Brian C. Sanders, Sanders, McEwan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for petitioner.
    
      Michael C. Maher, Douglas Barfield and Ronald J. Langa, Maher & Overchuck, Orlando, for respondent-Rodgers.
    Harold I. Lovell, Jr. and Marón E. Lovell, Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto & Dean, Orlando, for respondents-James E. Davis, M.D. and The St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs, the record and oral argument in this cause, we conclude that the trial court’s interlocutory order compelling discovery does not depart from the essential requirements of law, and hence the petition for writ of certiora-ri must be, and is hereby, denied.

Certiorari denied.

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.  