
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-50041.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 15, 2009.
    
    Filed Jan. 7, 2010.
    David Daniel Leshner, Assistant U.S., Todd W. Robinson, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Timothy Allen Scott, Law Offices of Timothy A. Scott, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Ramirez appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ramirez contends that the district court erred when it determined that Ramirez was not eligible for the “safety valve” relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)- The district court did not clearly err when it determined that Ramirez failed to truthfully provide to the government all relevant information concerning the conduct for which he was convicted and sentenced. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5); see also United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     