
    EATON v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 30, 1910.)
    Adulteet (§ 14) — Evidence—Sufficiency.
    In a prosecution for adultery, evidence held insufficient to support a conviction.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Adultery, Cent. Dig. §§ 27, 31-33; Dec. Dig. § 14.]
    Appeal from Johnson County Court; J. B. Haynes, Judge.
    Payte Eaton was convicted of adultery, and appeals.
    Reversed and remanded.
    Walkér & Baker and Odell & Johnson, for appellant. John A. Mobley, Ajsst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Deo. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   McCORD, J.

Appellant was convicted of adultery, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

There are numerous bills of exception contained. in the record. In view, however, of the conclusion we have reached in this ease, it becomes unnecessary to pass upon these, bills.

Appellant in the court below filed a motion for new trial, alleging that the yerdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that there was no evidence whatever to support the finding of the jury. The first witness placed upon the stand was Mrs. Irtich. She testified she was acquainted with Mrs. -Bessie Christian, hut did not know the defendant. She said Mrs. Christian lived close to her, and that she used to come to her house to phone, and that on one occasion Mrs. Christian called up the drug store, and asked for Mr. Eaton. This witness says she put her arms around Mrs. Christian and warned her as to her conduct; that she had heard Mrs. Christian call Mr. Eaton’s name. Mrs. Shields testified that some time in November, 1909, she ran a boarding house, and that .Mrs. Christian came there and stayed three or four days, and while there she was sick and spent most of the time in her room in bed; that on one occasion defendant had called there and asked for Mrs. Christian, and that he saw her in the room. Mrs. Christian at the time was sick in bed. Defendant, when leaving, told the witness that Mrs. Christian was quite sick, and asked if she had had a doctor for her; if not, one should be called. This was in the daytime. George Hurley testified that he knew the defendant and Mrs Christian; that he had seen them talking together on the streets, and saw them talking together at Ball & Williamson’s drug store. This was in the daytime. About Christmas he saw defendant one day go into a boarding house kept by Miss Crawford, where Mrs. Christian stayed. I-Ie saw them together in the front room talking. Howell testified he had seen Mrs. Christian driving in her father’s carriage on the road leading to the cemetery, and that he saw defendant get in the carriage and ride with her. This was in the daytime. Darnaby testified that one day he saw Mrs. -Christian out walking; that she came to his house, and left going towards her grandmother’s place, which was in East Cleburne; that he followed her, and saw her stop at Delia Ikard’s, an old colored woman; that he saw Payte Eaton going in the same direction, but did not know whether he went to the house or not; but after they got past the house he saw them together. This was in the daytime, and they were about 35 yards from her grandmother’s house. Delia Ikard testified that Mrs. Christian did stop in her house one day out of the rain. The defendant passed, but did not come in her house. Cook testified that on the public square he gaw defendant and some .woman, he did not ¿now -who; that they came to the foot of the steps of Huzz’s store, and he saw defendant kiss and hug her; that he had no idea who the woman was. Mrs. Christian took the stand, and testified that, while she had been in company of the defendant several times in the daytime, tljeir meetings were always public; that she was a widow, her husband being dead. She denied positively that defendant ever had intercourse with her. Steakley testified he knew the defendant, and that he was a married man, and his wife still living. Mrs. Darnaby testified that she missed her daughter' one night from the room, and got up and struck a match, and saw her daughter sitting on the steps of the adjoining house with the defendant. This is all the testimony in the case.

The information charged that the defendant did have carnal intercourse continuously with Mrs. Christian without living together; Mrs. Christian being a woman and he a married man. We do not think the evidence supports the finding of the jury, and is wholly insufficient to sustain the verdict. There was no evidence whatever of intercourse.

Because the evidence will not support the verdict, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.  