
    In the Matter of the Assessment for the Improvement of Baldwin and Other Streets in the City of Rochester, Respondent. Charles F. Ballard et al., Appellants.
    
      Matter of Baldwin Street, etc., Rochester, 169 App. Div. 128, affirmed.
    (Argued April 12, 1916;
    decided May 2, 1916.)
    Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 9, 1915, which reversed an order of Special Term vacating and setting aside certain assessments for street improvements. The controversy arose over the improvement of five streets, it being the contention of certain of the owners of property fronting on the streets that the “ territory of assessment ” should- include frontage on intersecting streets.
    
      Ednor A. Marsh and John H. Hopkins for appellants.
    
      B. B. Cunningham, Corporation Counsel (Charles L. Pierce of counsel), for respondent.
   Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ.  