
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vincente CERVANTES-AVALOS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-30295.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00160-RSL.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 18, 2002 .
    Decided May 28, 2002.
    Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Vincente Cervantes-Avalos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to a single count of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2).

Cervantes-Avalos’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Cervantes-Avalos did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the sentence.

We REMAND to the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), consistent with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2000); United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     