
    No. 46388.
    Protests 57529-K, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the tennis rackets in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, following May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573). It was also stipulated that the fur dogs in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 41823. The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1519(e) was therefore sustained as to these articles.  