
    KARPEL, Respondent, v. KASSE, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June, 1901.)
    Action by Solomon Karpel against Mendel ICasse.
    Abraham I. Spiro, for appellant. Elias Rosenthal, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The receipt given by plaintiff on June 9, 1900, was, at best, but prima facie evidence that the payment then made covered all previous transactions between the parties. The plaintiff swore that it did not cover the goods the value of which is sued for here, and the defendant swore it did. Thé justice had the witnesses before him, and was in a better position than we can be to decide which was most reliable. By an apparent error of calculation, judgment was rendered for §1.50 too much. It should be modified by deducting that sum, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Judgment modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.  