
    Michael BIGGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-1869.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 11, 1992.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925 (Fla.1990); Green v. State, 427 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 438 So.2d 834 (Fla.1983); Heuring v. State, 513 So.2d 122 (Fla.1987).

BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.

COPE, Judge

(dissenting).

In my view the evidence of defendant’s prior criminal acts did not satisfy any of the criteria contained in subsection 90.404(2), Florida Statutes (1989), and was consequently inadmissible. See C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence §§ 404.10, 404.12, 404.13, 404.14, 404.16 (1992); M. Graham, Handbook of Florida Evidence § 404.2 (1987). I would reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.  