
    OTTO DISHON v. STATE.
    No. A-1136.
    Opinion Filed September 14, 1912.
    Appeal from Caddo County Court; C. Eoss Hume, Judge.
    Otto Dishon was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and-appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Bristow & MeEadden, for plaintiff in error.
    Smith C. Matson and E. G. Spilman, Asst. Attys. Q-en., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and was adjudged to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. At the trial Ben Eord was jointly charged with Dishon, and the appeal was originally perfected by both parties. Eater Ford withdrew his appeal and the ease was submitted as to Dishon. We have carefully considered the record and briefs of both parties, and are of the opinion that substantial justice requires that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The judgment is affirmed.  