
    McKee et al. v. Hogan.
    
    (Division B.
    Feb. 14, 1927.)
    [111 So. 357.
    No. 25876.]
    Costs. Supreme court cannot allow attorneys’ fees in chancery and circuit courts, it being matter of original jurisdiction; supreme court cannot allow attorneys’ fees for services performed in courts of original jurisdiction; supreme court may allow attorneys’ fees in proper cases for services performed on appeal to it.
    
    The allowance of attorneys’ fees in the chancery and circuit courts is original jurisdiction, which the supreme court cannot exercise. This court cannot allow fees to attorneys for services performed in courts of original jurisdiction. It may, however, allow attorneys’ fees in proper cases for services performed on appeal to this court as incident to its appellate jurisdiction.
    Appeal from chancery court of Oktibbeha comity.
    HoN. AlleN Cox, Chancellor.
    Snit by F. L. Hogan against J. A. McKee and others, trustees of the separate school district of Starkville, for an injunction. From a judgment overruling a demurrer to complainant’s bill, defendants appeal. After reversal and dismissal of the bill (110 So. 775 preceding case herein), a motion was made for counsel fees.for dissolving the injunction both on the hearing in the trial court and on appeal, or, .in the alternative, to have the cause remanded for the allowance of attorneys’ fees by the trial court.
    Motion sustained in part, and overruled in part.
    
      McIntyre & Róberds and Will E, Ward and John D Greene, Jr., for appellants.
    
      W. W-. Magmder, for appellee,
    
      
      Corpus Juris-Cye. References: Costs, 15CJ, p. 274, n. 82; Courts, 15CJ, p. 1077, n. 13.
    
   Ethridge., J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On a former day the court reversed this cause and dismissed the bill (110 So. 775 supra page 747), which bill was for an injunction against the appellants to restrain the purchase of a school building lot for the separate school district of Starkville.

Motion is made here for counsels’ fees for dissolving the injunction, both on the hearing in the court below and the appeal to this court, or in the alternative, to have the cause remanded for the allowance of attorneys’ fees by the court below.

We are of opinion that we have no jurisdiction to grant attorney’s fee for services rendered in the court below, as that would be the exercise of original jurisdiction; therefore we cannot allow the attorney’s fees here for that service. However, we can allow the fee for services rendered here incident to the appeal to this court; and, considering .the record before us and the evidence submitted by the respective parties, we allow the attorney’s fee in the amount of two hundred Jifty^ dollars against the injunction bond for services rendered in this court. The cause will be remanded .to the chancery court for the purpose of permitting that court to pass upon the question of attorney’s fee for services rendered in that court.

Motion sustained in part, and overruled in pari.  