
    Leticia Rodriguez NAVA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-74508.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.
    
    Sept. 29, 2009.
    Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Leticia Rodriguez Nava, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

In her opening brief, Rodriguez Nava fails to address, and thereby waives any challenge to, the BIA’s order denying her motion to reopen. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s underlying order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying Rodriguez Nava’s application for cancellation of removal, because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     