
    Jerry D. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 79589
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: March 28, 2017
    Susan L. Hogan and Jeannette L. Wol-pink, Appellate Defenders, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
    Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Victor C. Howard and Gary D. Witt, Judges
   Order

Per Curiam:

Jerry Smith appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Smith first argues that counsel was ineffective in failing to object to one of the verdict directors on the ground that it contained a material variance from the information. Second, he argues that counsel was ineffective in failing to cross-examine the investigating detective regarding the lack of forensic testing done on the evidence obtained. Smith argues that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on both claims and that the motion court erred in denying him relief without affording him an eviden-tiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).  