
    People v Christopher Johnson,
    Nos. 152237, 152238, and 152239; Court of Appeals Nos. 316314, 316983, and 320014.
   On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7,2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. With regard to Court of Appeals Docket Nos. 316314 and 316983, the application for leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. With regard to Court of Appeals Docket No. 320014, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.  