
    Bozidar Franov et al., Appellants, v Exxon Company, USA, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
    Submitted April 27, 1992;
    decided June 11, 1992
   Motion for leave to appeal by the plaintiffs Franov dismissed upon the ground that said movants have failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]). Motion for leave to appeal by plaintiff Sango denied.  