
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bradley Rolison, Appellant.
   — Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered on November 29, 1990, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of violation of probation, and thereupon resentencing defendant for the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of l-Vz to 4-!ó years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.  