
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eddie OLMOS, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 11-40635, 11-40636
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 19, 2011.
    Randall Lynn Fluke, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Seth Kretzer, Law Offices of Seth Kretzer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Eddie Olmos, FCI Miami, Miami, FL, pro se.
    Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Eddie Olmos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Olmos has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Olmos’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Olmos’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     