
    9771.
    Garr v. The State.
    Decided October 22, 1918.
    Indictment for larceny of an automobile; from Fulton superior court—Judge HilL April 27, 1918.
    
      James & Bedgood, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.
   Broyles, P. J.

No special ground of the motion for a new trial shows reversible error, nor are any of the grounds of such a character as to require elaboration. The conviction of the accused was amply authorized by the evidence; and the court did-not err in refusing to grant a new trial..

Judgment. affirmed.

Bloodioorth and Harwell, JJ., concur.  