
    No. 792.
    Blachin & Giraud vs. S. Whited & Co.
    Where the allegation is that moneys were advanced and supplies furnished to four plantations, and a privilege upon the crops, stock, etc., upon all of them is claimed, which were accordingly sequestered, and a lessor of one of the plantations prefers his claim for rent thereof, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to shew what portion of his moneyed demand applied to such plantation, as against the lessor or other parties who prefer counter claims with privilege upon each respectively.
    Appeal from the District Court for Ouachita. Baker, J.
    
      Gobb & Gunby for Plaintiffs Appellants. B. Bay for Defendant.
   De Blanc, J.,

delivered the opinion affirming the judgment.  