
    Ex parte NORTHERN.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 11, 1911.)
    Habeas Corpus (§ 113) — Review—Presumptions.
    Where there is no statement of facts in the record on appeal in habeas corpus, the trial court’s rulings are presumptively correct.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Habeas Corpus, Dee. Dig. § 113.]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
    Application by Charles Northern for a writ of habeas corpus. From a judgment against relator, he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. [Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

It appears that relator was indicted by the grand jury of Dallas county, charged with murder. He sued out a writ of habeas corpus. Upon a hearing Hon. R. B. Seay, judge of the criminal district court, remanded him to the custody of the officer having him in charge, from which judgment he appealed to this court.

There is no statement of facts contained in the record, and every presumption will be indulged in favor of the correctness of the ruling of the district judge hearing the cause. Ex parte Naill, 59 Tex. Cr. R. 140, 127 S. W. 1031.

Judgment affirmed.

DAVIDSON, P. J., absent.  