
    Richard PEAMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leslie GRADET, Clerk of the Court; Peter B. Krauser, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-1998.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.
    Decided: Dec. 26, 2012.
    Richard Peamon, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Peamon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint alleging an error in the docketing of his state court action and the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Peamon v. Gradet, No. 1:12-cv-01241-WDQ (D. Md. July 12 & Aug. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED. 
      
       That error was corrected.
     