
    Audrey V. McLEAN, Appellant-Cross Appellee, v. Ralph E. McLEAN, Jr., Appellee-Cross Appellant.
    Nos. 79-1680, 79-2256 and 80-176.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 10, 1980.
    
      Bartel & Shuford and Stanley Jay Bartel, Miami, for Audrey V. McLean.
    Frishman & Miller and Henry M. Cain, Coral Gables, for Ralph E. McLean, Jr.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated by either party in the trial court’s determinations (a) awarding two years of rehabilitative, rather than permanent alimony; (b) as to the amount of that alimony; (c) denying the wife’s claim to a “special equity” in the husband’s interest in the marital home; (d) fixing the amount of the wife’s attorney’s fees and ordering that the husband pay one-half of that sum and (e) allocating responsibility between the parties for the expenses of a child psychologist. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Ingram v. Ingram, 379 So.2d 955 (Fla.1980); Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So.2d 672 (Fla.1979), adopting dissenting opinion, 352 So.3d 867 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1977); Ball v. Ball, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Creel v. Creel, 378 So.2d 1251 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). The final judgment and the post-final judgment orders under review are therefore

Affirmed. 
      
      . We specifically note that this provision is subject to modification upon a timely and proper showing under Section 61.14, Florida Statutes (1979). Cantor v. Cantor, 306 So.2d 596 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
     