
    In re William Baltz’s Will.
    Sup. Ct., 2 D.
    December 2, 1895.
    
      Jeheil T. Hurd, for app’lt; John R. T-residder, for resp’ts.
   Pratt, J.

The testator was shown to be competent. There is no suggestion that he was influenced. All the formalities were regarded, and the probate of the will must be affirmed, witli costs.  