
    SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,
    MAY, 1906.
    James Wilkinson, Appellant, v. The New York City Railway Company, Respondent.
    Municipal Courts — Procedure — Appearance — Effect of. Process—'Defects and amendments — Waiver of objections — By appearance.
    Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, third district, borough of Manhattan.
    Harcourt Bull, for appellant.
    William E. Weaver, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court, third district, in favor of the defendant for five dollars costs and dismissing. the plaintiff’s complaint. The summons was served on the defendant April 3, 1906. On the same day the defendant gave the plaintiff a written notice of appearance which was filed in court and which appears in the return. The return day of the summons is designated as the twelfth day of April, hut no year is indicated. However, on the 12th day of April, 1906, both plaintiff and defendant were present in court when the case was called for trial: The plaintiff was ready to proceed with the trial, but the defendant moved for a nonsuit on the ground that the summons was defective in failing to state the year as well as the day' of the return. This motion was granted and judgment entered as above stated. An action in the Municipal Court of this city is begun either by the service of a summons or by the voluntary appearance and joinder of issue by the parties. Mun. Ct. Act, § 26. This summons was defective and its service might have been set aside on motion, had the defendant appeared specially for that motion. But defendant appeared generally and so gave the court jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, notwithstanding the omission of the date from the summons. The general appearance was a waiver of the defect in the summons, and as was said in the case of Kramer v. Gerlach, 28 Misc. Rep. 525, 527, “ conferred jurisdiction upon the court, even if not otherwise acquired.” See also Reed v. Chilson, 142 N. Y. 152.

For these reasons the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event.

Present: Geldebsleeve, Davis and Clinch, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.  