
    GARLAND v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK.
    No. 7661. 7661--Opinion
    Opinion Filed June 20, 1916.
    (158 Pac. 448.)
    Appeal and Error — Case-Made—Service— Parties.
    All persons against whom a joint judgment has been rendered must be made parties to a proceeding in error to reverse such judgment, and such of those parties who fail or refuse to join in the appeal as plaintiffs in error must be made defendants in error; and, in such cases the case-made must he served upon them, and summons in error, unless waived, must be issued and served upon them.
    (Syllabus by Mathews, C.)
    Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. ITayson, Judge.
    Action by the American National Bank against IX N. Garland and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant named brings error.
    Dismissed.
    D. D. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.
    Ames, Chambers, Lowe & Riehardsou, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

This was an action upon a joint promissory note. A joint judgment was rendered against the defendants, D. N. Garland and E. H. Perry. The said Garland filed a motion for a new trial. The same was overruled, and ho alone brings error to this court.

It appeal's that the case-made was not served upon E. H. Perry, and that he has not been made a party to this appeal. Summons in error ivas not served upon him, and neither has he waived the same.

The motion to dismiss filed heroin must be sustained. It has long since become tlie settled and uniform bolding of this court that all persons against whom a joint judgment has boon rendered most lie made parties to a proceeding in error to reverse such judgment, and such of those parties who fail or refuse to join in the appeal as plaintiffs in error must ho made defendants in error, and in such cases the case-made must be served upon them, and summons in error, unless waived, must be issued and served upon them. Wedd v. Gates et al., 15 Okla. 602, 82 Pac. 808; Continental Gin Co. v. Huff et al., 25 Okla. 798, 108 Pac. 369 ; May et al. v. Fitzpatrick et al., 35 Okla. 45, 127 Pac. 702 ; Smyser & McCormick v. Hudson, 38 Okla. 104, 331 Pac. 1076; Zeimann v. Bennett et al., 39 Okla. 344, 134 Pac. 1124: Price & Miller v. Ratcliffe et al., 47 Okla. 370, 148 Pac. 153.

We recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: Tt is so ordered.  