
    ATKINS v. PAGE et al.
    No. 12864
    Opinion Filed April 25, 1922.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal ami Error — Moot Question — Dismissal.
    When the question presented by an appeal has become moot, the appeal will be dismissed.
    Error from District Court, Creek County;. Lucien B. Wright, Judge.
    Exceptions by Sallie Atkins to supersedeas bond given by Charles Page et al. overruled, and she brings error.
    Dismissed.
    Gibson & Hull, J. D. Sims, Harry G. DaVis, MeDougal, Lytle, Allen & Pryor, and Rice & Lyons, for plaintiff in error.
    Stuart, Sharp & Cruce, West, Sherman, Davidson & Moore, H. O. Bland, Paul P. Pinkerton, and Rice & Lyons, for defendants in error.
   KENNAMER, J.

Sallie Atkins, plaintiff in error, prosecutes this appeal to reverse an order of the district court overruling exceptions to a supersedeas bond given by Charles Page et al., superseding the judgment rendered 'in favor of Sallie Atkins in an action in the district court of Creek county wherein Sallie Atkins was plaintiff and Charles Page et al. were defendants.

This court has, this day, ’in an opinion filed in cause No. 12769, reversed the judgment of the district court and directed that judgment be entered in favor of the defendants in the cause. Tn this situation, the questions involved in this appeal have become moot and the appeal will be dismissed. It is so ordered.

HARRISON, C. J., PITCHFORD, Y. C. J.. and JOHNSON, MILLER, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.  