
    Thomas F. McCall, Respondent, v. Emma L. Jacquelin, Appellant.
    ■ Appeal from order denying motion to vacate order- for substituted service. ■
    
      Redfield & Redfield, for appellant.
    
      Michael H. Curran, for respondent.
   Conlan, J.

The order for substituted service was properly made and the requirements of the Code observed. Motion - to vacate was properly denied. • •

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons and Botty, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.  