
    16435.
    Baugh v. The State.
    Decided June 20, 1925.
    Conviction of possessing liquor; from city court of Floyd county —Judge Bale. April 6, 1925.
    
      Nunnally & Featherston, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Alec Harris, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  