
    William Blair BARTLETT, Petitioner, v. WARD ROOFING, INC., et al., Respondents.
    No. 34646.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 1, 1965.
    Frank F. Cosgrove, Miami, for petitioner.
    Knight, Underwood, Peters & Hoeveler,. Joseph V. Niemoeller, Miami, Patrick H.. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner,. Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 18, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’!;' petition for attorney’s fees be denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS,. ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.  