
    17310.
    Parrish v. The State.
   Luke, J.

The defendant’s conviction of possessing intoxicating liquor was amply authorized by the evidence. No error of law appears- to have been committed on the trial, and defendant’s motion for a new trial, which was based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled.

Decided June 15, 1926.

Possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Metter— Judge Lanier. March. 20, 1926.

G. W. Turner, for plaintiff in error.

L. G. Anderson, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  