
    Edward Field, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pardon G. Seabury et al.
    The decision in the preceding case of Field v. Seabury, again affirmed.
    This, like the preceding case, was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the dis- . trict of California. It was argued in connection with the preceding case.
   Mr. Justice ’WAYKE

delivered the opinion of the court..

This case was like the preceding, and they were argued together.

Eor the reasons given in tire first of them, the court directs the reversal of the judgment in the court below, in this case.  