
    No. 39410.
    Protests 111101-G, etc., of Globe Shipping Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) materials and articles in chief value of cellulose filaments at 60 percent under paragraph 31, Abstract 37230 followed; (2) embroidered wearing apparel the same as that passed upon in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (3) silk wearing apparel at 60 percent under paragraph 1210, Abstract 29972 followed.  