
    (First Circuit—Hamilton Co., O., Circ’t Court
    Jan. Term, 1899.)
    Before Smith, Swing and Giffen, JJ.
    IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN B. HAYMAN, Notary Public.
    
      Removal of Notary Public — Proof of charges must l e clear and satisfactory— .,
    (For decision in Common Pleas, see 1 N. P. 515.)
    Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.
    Hayman, a notary public, was tried upon charges of misconduct and unfaithfulness in the discharge of his duties, andi was found guilty, and an order entered removing him from the. office of notary public of Hamilton county, Ohio, assessing the costs against him, and directing that the clerk transmit to hie excellency the governor of the state a copy of charges and specifications, together with a copy of the entry, certified under the seal of the court, as provided by section 123, Revised Statutes.
    
      Campbell. Bates. Cien Dening & Meyer, for Hayman,
    
      Thomas H. Darby, for the State.
   SWING, J.

We are of the opinion that the judgment in this case should be reversed, on the ground that it is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The evidence in a case of this kind should bo clear and satisfactory, that the party was guilty of the offense charged. And it seems to us that it comes very far short of being such.

Judgment reversed and remanded.  