
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacey Cornelius HARRIS, a/k/a Stacy Cornelius Harris, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-7520.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 22, 2012.
    Stacey Cornelius Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    
      Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. .
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Stacey Cornelius Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 4:07-cr-00011-JLK-2 (W.D.Va. Nov. 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  