
    City of Ventnor, appellant, v. J. Harry Fulmer et al., respondents.
    [Decided April 28th, 1922.]
    On appeal from 'a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. lft 8.
    
    
      Messrs. Bourgeois é Coulomb, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Theodore W. Schimpf, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black,, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 14.

For reversal — None.  