
    William Lord, Respondent, v. Orlando Cooper, Appellant.
    
      Farm of the verification of a village assessment roll—the form used by town assessors, when not required —presumption that a village assessor lias done his duty.
    
    A direction contained in the charter of a village (Laws of 1869, chap. 486, § 34), to its assessor “ to prepare an assessment roll and valuation of property subject to taxation in the village, and to compile the same in all respects, as nearly as practicable, in the manner prescribed by law in respect to town assessors,” does not constitute an explicit requirement that the assessor shall verify the assessment roll in the manner required by law of town assessors.
    
      Semble, that where the charter gives the village trustees power to describe and" define the powers and duties of the village officers, whose powers and duties are not specifically declared by the charter, the court will presume that the assessor did his duty in the matter of verification, and will hold a verification, made by him of an assessment roll, which would be insufficient if made by town assessors, to the effect “ that the foregoing assessment is just and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief,” sufficient to sustain as valid a tax warrant issued to a village collector by the president and trustees of the village, and to justify a levy made under the warrant by the collector.
    Appeal by the defendant, Orlando Cooper, from a judgment of the County Court of Cortland county in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Cortland on the 18th day of December, 1896, upon the decision of the court affirming a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of fifty dollars and eleven cents damages, besides costs.
    
      John H. Kelley, for the appellant.
    
      Lewis Bouton, for the respondent.
   Merwin, J.:

This action was brought for the conversion of certain chattels. The defendant was collector of the village of McGrawville, and he levied upon and sold the chattels by virtue of a tax list and warrant issued to him by the president and trustees of that village. The answer was a general denial, and plaintiff claims that the defendant cannot justify under his tax warrant. The evidence, however, on the subject was admitted, and no objection was raised then by the plaintiff as to the pleadings. The tax sought to be collected was against the plaintiff.

The main question here is whether the warrant was void and the defendant a trespasser by reason of the character of the verification of the assessment roll made by the assessor of the village. The statute under which he acted was the charter of the village (Chap. 486 of the Laws of 1869).

The verification' was in the following form :

“ State of Hew Yoke, )
as
r County of Cortland, ) '
“ I, L. A. Dibble, being duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing assessment is just and correct to the. best-of my knowledge and belief. L. A. DIBBLE.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of May, 1895. ■
“ H. C. Chaffee, •
Village ClerhP

If the law applicable to town assessment rolls on the subject' of the oath or verification to be made by the town assessors upon the completion of the roll applies to an assessment roll made under the charter of the village of McGrawville, then it must, I think,- under the authorities, be conceded that, the verification in question was fatally defective, and the warrant attached to it no protection to the defendant. (Van Rensselaer v. Witbech, 7 N. Y. 517; Westfall v. Preston, 49 id. 355; People ex rel. Gillies v. Suffern, 68 id. 326.) It is, however, claimed by the defendant that, under the provisions of the charter of the village, it was not necessary to attach to the roll the oath required in case of -town assessments. That depends upon the construction to be given to section 34 of the charter, which is as follows:

“ § 34. It shall be the duty of the assessor, within sixty days after the annual election, to prepare an assessment roll and valuation of property subject to taxation in the village, and to compile the same in all respects, as nearly as practicable, in the manner prescribed by law in respect to town assessors; and the village assessor is hereby invested with the same powers in respect to assessment as. town assessors have, including the power to administer oaths and to correct. ■the valuation on the application of persons interested; but. the . notice of the time and place of meeting to hear applications to correct the valuation shall be published at least two weeks next preceding the time appointed, and posted in three public places in the village.”

By section 35 it is provided that the assessor, upon the completion of the assessment roll of valuation, and upon receiving from the trustees their direction as to the amounts to be raised, shall apportion the same according to the valuation and set the several sums so apportioned opposite the valuation in the same manner as required for town and county lists.

By section 38-it is provided that it shall be the duty of the assessor, upon the completion of the tax or assessment roll, to deliver the same to the clerk of the village, and thereupon it shall be the duty of the president and clerk of the village, forthwith, to execute under the corporate seal and attach to such roll a warrant to the village collector for the collection of the tax, similar in form to the one prescribed by law for the collection of town and county taxes.

There is no specific direction as to the oath or verification to be made in connection with the rolL The provision, if any, which covers the subject is the direction in section 34, to compile the same,” that is, the assessment roll and valuation of property, in all respects, as nearly as practicable, in the manner prescribed by law in respect to town assessors.”

A direction to compile is not a direction to verify. The necessity or propriety of an oath or verification does not arise until the compilation is completed. It is possible that the person who drew the charter may have intended to use the word complete instead of compile. We are, however, to construe the statute in view of the language in fact used. In so construing it there was no direction to verify the roll in the manner required by law in case of town rolls, and, therefore, the absence of such a verification does not make the warrant void.

There is a provision of the charter (§ 21, subd. 1) which conferred upon the trustees the power to prescribe and define the powers and duties of the officers of the village whose powers and duties are not specifically declared by the act. Under this, it may perhaps be assumed that the verification in fact made was in accordance with the direction of the trustees. Presumptively the' assessor did his duty. (Chamberlain v. Taylor, Hun, 24.)

We are of the opinion that the defendant was protected by his warrant, and, therefore, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.

All concurred.

Judgment of the County Court and of the justice reversed with costs in all.the courts.  