
    (10 Misc. Rep. 551.)
    SICKELS v. COMBS.
    (Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.
    June, 1894.)
    Injunction—Adequate Remedy at Law.
    Where defendant, under execution against a third person, seized plaintiff’s stock of goods, took possession of her store and of the books and papers of the business, and locked up the store, thus completely interrupting the business, plaintiff’s remedy at law is inadequate, and an injunction will lie.
    Action by Catherine L. Sickels against William H. Combs to enjoin defendant from proceeding under an execution against a third person. Judgment for plaintiff.
    Sidney Y. Lowell, for plaintiff.
    Bichard Marvin, for defendant.
   GAYS'OB, J.  