
    In re: Reginald P. BURGESS, Debtor, Reginald P. Burgess, Appellant, v. James Leonard Brown, Chapter 7 Trustee; et al., Appellees.
    No. 04-56149.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 23, 2005.
    
    Decided April 13, 2005.
    Reginald P. Burgess, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    James Leonard Brown, Chapter 7 Trustee, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    Brian D. Wirsching, Esq., Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, Glendale, CA, pro se.
    L’Tanya M. Butler, Esq., Andrea Van-Leesten, Law Offices of Andrea G. Van Leesten, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellees.
    Andrea VanLeesten, Law Offices of Andrea G. Van Leesten, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    Gary M. Ruttenberg, Bloom & Rutten-berg, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    Cynthia Miller, Bloom & Ruttenberg, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    U.S. Trustee, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Reginald P. Burgess appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision denying his request to intervene in his former attorney’s appeal from a bankruptcy court’s denial of sanctions. We lack jurisdiction over Burgess’ appeal because the BAP’s order denying Burgess’ request to intervene constituted a final judgment and he did not file his notice of appeal within 30 days of that order. See United States v. City of Oakland, 958 F.2d 300, 301-02 (9th Cir.1992); see also Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (indicating that a civil appeal must be filed within 30 days after final judgment).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     