
    No. 440
    No. 19509
    Lake Shore Electric Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Comm. George P. Sohngen, receiver, v. Public Utilities Commission. Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. The Public Utilities Commission. C. C. C. & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. C. D. & M. Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. C. D. & M. Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. Western Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. B. & O. R. R. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. Erie R. R. Co. et al v. Public Utilities Commission. Columbus Railway Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. The Youngstown & Suburban Transport Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. Columbus & Zanesville Transport Co. v. Public Utilities Commission. Dayton & Columbus Transport Co. v. Public Utilities Commission.
    No. 19510
    No. 19524
    No. 19542
    No. 19538
    No. 19567
    No. 19561
    No. 19574
    No. 19576
    No. 19581
    No. 19584
    No. 19588
    No. 19589
    No. 19592
    Error to the Public Utilities Commission.
    793. MOTOR VEHICLES — 1. Publication must be made of application for certificate to operate motor transportation.
    2. Where regular lines are furnishing reasonable service, casual and unusual service cannot be authorized.
   MARSHALL, C. J.

1. By the provisions of section 614-91, General Code, an applicant for a certificate to operate motor transportations over all the streets and highways of the state must give notice of the filing thereof by publication made one a week for three weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published at the county seat of each county in the state in or through which the applicant proposes to operate.

2. A certificate for motor transportation of passengers upon irregular routes over all public highways, roads and streets in the State of Ohio for the convenience of the casual travelers over highways, roads and streets already traversed by regular routes, is unauthorized where it is not shown that the regular lines of transportation service are not furnishing reasonable facilities for such travel.

2. Casual and unusual service such as heretofore has been rendered under private contract is not the proper subject-matter of a certificate of public convenience and necessity.

Order reversed.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.  