
    William H. Mahoney, Respondent, v. James O’Neill, Appellant.
    Appeal by the defendant from an order taxing the plaintiff’s bill of costs, as presented after a third trial of the case. The main appeal in the case was from the judgment. Upon the second trial the plaintiff recovered judgment. This .was affirmed on appeal to the General Term of the City Court, with costs, but the Appellate Term reversed it “ with costs to appellant (defendant) to abide the event.”
    Kenneson, Crain, Emley & Rubino (Thaddeus D. Kenneson, of counsel), for appellant.
    Lamb, Osborne & Petty (Gilbert D. Lamb, of counsel), for .respondent.
   McCarthy, J.

This is known as the second appeal and is an appeal by the defendant from an order affirming the clerk’s taxation of the bill of costs as presented by the plaintiff.

This case has been tried three times. On the first trial the jury disagreed, and on the second and third trials the verdict was for the -plaintiff. The clerk awarded to the plaintiff, as stated in his brief, all his costs and disbursements on the trials and appeals where he had succeeded in addition to the costs of the trial (now under review) and he was deprived only of the costs in the Appellate Term where defendant had succeeded. We think this was correct and in conformity with the case of Belt v. Am. Central Ins. Co., 33 App. Div. 239, and cases therein cited; also the Sisters of Charity v. Kelly, 68 N. Y. 628; First Nat. Bank v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 84 N. Y. 469. The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Conlan and Schuohmae, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.  