
    The State, ex rel. Eaton Corporation, v. Lancaster et al. (Two cases.) The State, ex rel. GCC Beverages, Inc., Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant, et al. The State, ex rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant, et al.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1989), 44 Ohio St. 3d 106.]
    (Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312-
    Submitted March 28, 1989
    Decided July 12, 1989.)
    
      Willacy & LoPresti and Aubrey B. Willacy, for relator in case Nos. 87-622 and 87-1887.
    
      Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Michael L. Squillace and Merl H. Wayman, for respondents, members of the Industrial Commission, and appellant, Industrial Commission, in case Nos. 87-622, 87-1887 and 88-205, respectively.
    
      Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Russell P. Herrold, Jr., and Robert A. Minor, in support of reimbursement in case No. 88-205, for amicus curiae Ohio Manufacturers’ Association.
   Per Curiam.

On authority of State, ex rel. Peabody Coal Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1989), 44 Ohio St. 3d 104, 541 N.E. 2d 74, we hereby grant Surplus Fund reimbursement in case Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312 for all amounts of temporary total compensation paid to the claimants herein subsequent to the respective findings of permanency.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J.,

concurring. I am pleased to see the majority of the court reverse itself and adopt the position set forth in my concurrence (joined in by Justice Sweeney) in the original decision in these cases as reported in State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 404, 416-417, 534 N.E. 2d 46, 58. Obviously, I concur in the majority opinion,

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.  