
    No. 1960.
    Louisiana Mutual Insurance Company v. G. Batt and S. Cambon.—Same v. Jean Dubarry and W. Maylie—Consolidated.
    Hotes that have keen given to the city of New Orleans for a lease of certain markets, secured ky mortgage, which have keen transferred ky the city, and passed into the hands of third parties before maturity, can not ke discharged in city notes. In such a case, the holder can recover from the maker the full amount in lawful currency.
    APPEAL from the Fourth District Court, parish of Orleans. Théard, J.
    
      Hace, Foster & F. T. Merrick, for plaintiffs and appellants. Oyprien JDufour, for defendants and appellees.
   Howe, J.

The notes sued upon in these cases were made as follows: The one by G-. Batt, with S. Cambon as indorser, the other by Jean Dubarry, with W. Maylie as indorser. They were rent notes, given in this form to the city of New Orleans in accordance with the terms of certain market leases, and paraphed by the notary before whom the leases were executed. They were transferred before maturity,-and for a valuable consideration, to the plaintiff'.

The defense in each ease was, that the note in suit was made payable at the office of the City Treasurer; that it was identified with the leasej that the city of New Orleans had agreed to received what are known as “city money,” or “city notes,” in payment of debts due to it; that the defendants had tendered the same at the maturity of the, obligation in suit; and that the plaintiffs were fully aware of these-equities, and were not bona fide holders of the note, but held the same-for account of the city of New Orleans.

The court below gave judgment as prayed for by the defendants, decreeing that the notes be paid in “city money,” and that the costs-of the suit be borne by plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

It plainly appears, from the testimony', that the plaintiffs became, as. already remarked, owners of the notes for value, before maturity. As for notice of any such equity as that alleged, we are unable to find any-in the notes, the paraphs, or the leases, or that any such notice was. otherwise brought home to the plaintiffs. The case is not unlike that, of Case v. Berwin, lately decided, and the judgment should be the same.. 22 An. page —.

It is therefore ordered, in the case first named, being No. 21,751 of. the docket of the Fourth District Court for the parish of Orleans, that: the judgment appealed from be amended in favor of plaintiffs, by striking therefrom the clause which provides that the sanie shall be-payable in city money, and that the costs shall be borne by plaintiffs ; that, as thus amended, the judgment be affirmed, and that the-defendants, Batt and Cambon, pay, in solido, the costs of both courts.

And, in the case secondly named, being No. 21,752 of the docket of: said district court, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from be amended in favor of plaintiffs, by striking therefrom the clause which, provides that the same shall be payable in city money, and that the-costs be borne by plaintiffs; that, as thus amended, the judgment be affirmed, and that the defendants, Dubarry and Maylie, pay, in solido,, the costs of both courts.  