
    Jacob Early v. Howard J. Burtis et al.
    A steam boiler placed and used on the premises by a lessee, who afterwards purchased the premises, which steam boiler was not attached to the soil, but moved from place to place about the building, and rested by its own weight on a foundation, with about thirty feet of pipe supported by iron clamps and bars, which were fastened to the main building by spikes, is not a fixture as between the purchase-money mortgagee of the lands, and a subsequent elaimant of such boiler under a bill of sale from the grantee of the premises.
    On bill to foreclose.
    
      Mr. S. M. SchancJc, for complainant.
    
      Mr. P. S. Scovel, for defendant Burtis.
   Bird, Y. C.

The bill is to foreclose two mortgages — one for $1,000, a purchase-money mortgage, and one for $500 for money loaned. After the filing of the bill, the complainant comes into court and .shows that defendant Burtis had sold to his father, another defendant, a steam boiler which had been used in and upon the premises in question, and that the father had advertised it at public sale, and had sold it and had bid it off to himself, and was -about to remove it. The complainant asks for an injunction restraining such removal.

Early leased the premises to H. J. Burtis, the son, with the ■privilege of buying. While under the lease, H. J. Burtis put the boiler in the building and used it in connection with the •engine of the complainant, to cook tomatoes for canning. The same purposes as before and since. Afterwards he enclosed it.. It has never been in any manner attached to the soil. It has-always stood upon a brick or other foundation by its own weight. There are about thirty feet of pipe extending upward, supported by iron bars and clamps, the bars being fastened to the main building by large nails or spikes. The boiler has been twice taken out and carried to the machinists for repairs.

The lease was executed on March 15th, 1881, soon after which the boiler was placed in position by H. J. Burtis. On February 4th, 1883, the complainant made a deed to H. J. Burtis for the premises, and took the first mortgage. In October, 1884, H. J. Burtis gave a bill of sale to his father, J. K. Burtis, for the boiler and other articles. In November, 1884, II. J. Burtis gave the $500 mortgage to the complainant. The complainant insists that the boiler is a fixture, and is subject to the liens of his mortgages.

I cannot conclude that the complainant is right. I do not find a single case in New Jersey which goes so far. If this chattel became a fixture, it was only because of the slight attachment of the pipe to the main building. I cannot so decide without moving directly in the face of all the decisions upon the .subject in this state, as I understand them.  