
    Mary Staub, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Appellant.
    Appeal from an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for a preference.
   Per Curiam:

Prom the papers it appears that the plaintiff, who was inj ured in October, 1914, is now employed, earning wages and board, and there are no such special circumstances shown as would warrant a preference over other issues. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.  