
    Henry Anderson and another v. Peter Cunningham.
    Appeal from the Commercial Court of New Orleans, Watts, J.
    
      L. C. Duncan, for the plaintiffs.
    
      Mitchell, for the appellant.
   Garland, J.

This case was before us in June,-1842, (2 Robinson, 463,) and was then remanded for a new trial, principally for the purpose of ascertaining whether a sum of $529 62, received by the plaintiffs of Dakin & Dakin, was credited to the defendant, in the account on file. The evidence on that point now satisfactorily shows, that the defendant has a credit for the nett proceeds of Dakin & Dakin’s note. The inferior Judge has fully examined the case, and has,, in our opinion, allowed the defendant every thing he has shown he is entitled to claim.

Judgment affirmed.  