
    No. 9657.
    The State of Louisiana vs. Sam Burns et als.
    
      An appeal in a criminal proceeding, asked after the term during which the judgment complained of was rendered and mad'o returnable on appellant’s suggestion, on an improper day, must be dismissed as sought and returned too late.
    APPEAL from the Seventeenth District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge. Burgess, J.
    
    
      M. J. Cunningham, Attorney General, and L. J. Beale, District Attorney, for the State, Appellee.
    
      Robertson & Tiussell and G- & W. Buckner, for Defendant and Appel•ant.
   On Motion to Dismiss.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

The sureties on the appearance bond furnished by ■one of the defendants, appeal from the judgment forfeiting their bond.

The State moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that it was taken too late.

It is settled that the proceeding to forfeit is criminal in character. 37 Ann. 200; 7 Ann. 276.

. The judgment forfeiting the bond was signed on the 22d of November, 1884, and the appeal was sought and granted on J une 8th following (1885).

In appealable criminal cases, the appeal must be asked during the term at which the judgment is rendered and not after, and it must be made returnable within ten days from the granting. Act 1878, No. 30) secs. 1, 3 and 4.

The appeal was prayed for by petition and asked to be made returnable to this Court, at New Orleans, on the second Monday of February,. 3886. The order was in accordance. For this error the appellant is responsible, as he suggested an improper return day.

As the appeal was not asked during but after the term at which the judgment complained of was rendered, and is besides made returnable,, at appellants’ suggestion, on an improper day, in violation of law, it. cannot be maintained.

It is ordered that the appeal be dismissed.  