
    Before the Second Division,
    July 18, 1938
    No. 39014.
    Protest 165846-G of G. M. Boutross Co., Inc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was found that certain items consist of filet laces similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) and other items like those passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396). On the established facts filet laces and certain towels and squares were held dutiable as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.  