
    David Michael MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONMED, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Jason Bingham, Cpl.; John Carhart, Sgt.; Senior Trooper Claycomb; Frank Fornoss, Str.; Stred Winkler, Senior Trooper; Sgt. Galligan; Scott Pederson; K. R. Jenkins, Officer; Jamie Grover, Officer; Chris Taylor, Tfc.; Edward Eicher, Sgt.; Tpr Bishop; The Carroll County Jail; Mr. Hardinger, Warden; Anne Arundel County Police; State Police Westminster, Defendants.
    No. 16-1133
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 17, 2017
    Decided: February 24, 2017
    David Michael Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Thomas Althauser, Megan Green Anderson, Eric Matthew Rigatuso, EC-CLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland for Appellee.
    Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Michael Montgomery appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Conmed, Inc., on Montgomery’s 42 U.S.C. §.1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Montgomery’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Montgomery has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny Montgomery’s motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  