
    Tam v. East Side Loan Company.
    [No. 26,407.
    Filed February 23, 1935.]
    
      Don R. French, for appellant.
    
      Clyde P. Miller, for appellee.
   Teemain, J.

The judgment of the trial court in this case depends upon the validity of Chapter 61, Acts 1925. In Lyle Martin v. Rudolph Loula, etc., et al., No. 26,386, the Chapter is held to be unconstitutional and void. Upon that authority the judgment is affirmed.  