
    Albert Hughes, Respondent, v. Charles Martin, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
    S. G. Derrickson, for appellant.
    Jeroloman & Arrowsmith, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The indisputable evidence showed that defendant, under an assumed name, employed the plaintiff as a broker in realty to perform services for him. Those services were rendered, and the defendant failed to. pay the regular commission. We think the judgment awarded for such commission is correct.

Present: Scott, P. T., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.  