
    
      OLDHAM vs. POLK.
    
    Appeal from the court of the second district.
    A clause it an act, au-thorising any attorney to confess judg- ' ment, does not authorise the issue of a writ of seizure and sala..
   Porter. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff obtained an order of seizure and sale on a mortgage by public act, which the defendant had executed in his favor The instrument was in the Usual form, with the exception of the following clause, “and the said George W. Oldham does hereby for himself&, J his heirs, in the event the said note be not paid ⅜ at maturity, grant power to any attorney at law duly admitted to practice in the courts of this state, to appear, and for him, and in his name» confess judgment in due and legal form, in favor of said Samuel W. Polk, up to the amount of the said note, &e. &,c.”

Our code provides, that where the title amounts to a confession of judgment (emporte execution paré?} the creditor on making out that the debt is due, may obtain an order for the immediate seizure of the property mortgaged: and this court has decided, that an authentic act containing a mortgage, is sueh a title as amounts to a confession of judgment.

And so the instrument on which the order of seizure and sale was obtained in this case would be, were it not for the clause already set out To give that part of the act any meaning, .or supnose it inserted for any purpose, we must conclude the parties did not intend this instrument should amount to a Confession of judgment, for if they had, they would not have provided for an attorney going before a court to confess judgment. The conferring such a ]pow<*r is irreconcilable with the idea, thaf execution was to issue on the act without judg-J ° ment being previously confessed.

Porter for the plaintiff

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs.  