
    AZTEC OIL CO. v. DAGUE.
    No. 17324
    Opinion Filed June 15, 1926.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Case-Made—Invalidity ,of Order Extending Time — Effect. ¡
    
    Where the time for stflwing case-made has expired, an order of extension made subsequent thereto is void, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the case on appeal.
    See 4 C. J. p. 350 §1991; 2 R. C. L. p. 159: 4 R. C. L. Supp. p. 86; 5 R. C. D. Supp. p. 75. .
    Appeal from Court of Common Pleas, Tulsa County; Saul A. Yeager. Judge.
    Action between tibe Aztec Oil Company and A. B. C. Dague. Prom the judgment, the former appeals.
    Dismissed.
    West, Gibson, Sherman, Davidson & Hull, for plaintiff in error.
    Lashley & Rambo-, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion for new trial was overruled on the 19th day of October, 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was given 45 days from date of order in which to serve case-made. This time expired on the 3rd day of December, 1925. Case-made w,as not served within this time, and on the 4th day of December, 1925, the iconrt made a further order of extension. Defendant in error moves the court to dismiss appeal on tlie ground that 'the trial court was without jurisdiction to make the order of December 4, 1925, for the reason that the time granted .previously had expired.

Where the time for serving ease-made ■has expired, an order of extension made subsquent thereto is void, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the case on appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.  