
    14665.
    Hill v. The State.
    Decided July 10, 1923.
    Indictment for possessing liquor; from Whitfield superior court — Judge Tarver. May 9, 1923.
    
      M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence was amply sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the defendant, in Whitfield county, committed the offense charged.

2. The 5th ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having been referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, is treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., oonour.  