
    BANKER v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 28, 1912.
    Rehearing Denied March 27, 1912.)
    Bail (§ 65) — Appeal—Dismissal.
    Where the recognizance does nob show that appellant has been convicted of any offense, or that any punishment has been assessed against him, the Court of Criminal Appeals is without jurisdiction.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bail, Cent. Dig. § 285; Dee. Dig. § 65.]
    Appeal from Ft. Bend County Court; G. C. Baker, Jr., Judge.
    W. F. Banker was convicted of crime, and appeals.
    Dismissed.
    W. L. Davidson, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Deo. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, because the recognizance is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court, in that it does not show that appellant has been convicted of any offense known to the law, and does not state what punishment, if any, was assessed against him.

The motion is sustained, and the appeal dismissed, for the reasons stated in the motion.  