
    Argued and submitted August 24,
    affirmed December 7, 1981
    reconsideration denied January 14,
    petition for review denied February 3,1982 (292 Or 568)
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD WAYNE COLLINS, Appellant.
    
    No. CR80-516, CA 19942)
    636 P2d 1028
    William M. Horner, Monmouth, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
    Stephen F. Peifer, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.
    Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Warren, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for menacing, ORS 163.190, asserting five assignments of error. Four of the five assignments, as set forth in defendant’s brief, fail to comply with Rule 7.19 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides, in part:

“* * * [Assignments of error which the court can consider only by searching a record for the proceedings complained of will not be considered and a brief not complying with the rules may be stricken.”

Accordingly, we decline to consider those four assignments. State v. Cooney, 36 Or App 217, 222, 584 P2d 329 (1978).

The remaining assignment of error substantially complies with Rule 7.19 in that it sets out the instruction which defendant contends he requested. That instruction, which the trial court refused to give, related to the defense of self-defense of another person, and was in proper form. State v. Castle, 48 Or App 15, 616 P2d 510 (1980). However, the only argument defendant makes is that the instruction was in proper form and that he was entitled to have it given for that reason. He points to no evidence which arguably could have supported that defense. The trial court did not err in refusing to give the requested instruction.

Affirmed.  