
    24378.
    Fincher v. The State.
    Decided November 23, 1934.
    
      Walter Matthews, for plaintiff in error.
    
      S. W. Ragsdale, solicitor-general, contra.
   Guebry, J.

The defendant was indicted for manufacturing intoxicating liquor and for the' possession of distilling apparatus. The jury found him guilty of the last-named offense. While the evidence as to his possession of the apparatus was meager and not entirely satisfactory, this court is unable to say that the verdict is not sufficiently supported by competent evidence. We, therefore, must decline to interfere with it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.  