
    164 So. 919
    R. P. HUGULEY v. STATE.
    4 Div. 196.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Nov. 19, 1935.
    Roy L. Smith, of Phenix City, for appellant.
    A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for. the State.
   SAMFORD, Judge.

The only point presented for decision is the action of the trial court in overruling defendant’s motion, that he be discharged for the “Want of competent testimony against him.” All of the testimony introduced by the state was competent and tended to connect the defendant with the crime charged in the indictment. The motion does not test the sufficiency of the evidence.

There is no error appearing in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.  