
    McKONE et al. v. HOGAN.
    No. 6484.
    Opinion Filed February 15, 1916.
    (155 Pac. 560.)
    APPEAL AND ERRO® — Keeord—Questions Presented for Review— Evidence. Where it is necessary to examine tlie evidence to determine the issues raised on appeal, and it appears upon the face of the record that all the evidence offered and introduced at the trial of the cause has not been brought to this court by the case-made, the appeal may be dismissed or the judgment affirmed.
    (Syllabus by Brett, C.)
    
      Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; James B. Cullison, Judge.
    
    Action by S. W. Hogan against Isabella A. McKone and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
    Affirmed.
    
      
      D. K. Cunningham, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      F. L. Boynton, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was commenced Tby S. W. Hogan, the defendant in error, against Isabella A. McKone and Roger McKone, the plaintiffs in error, to recover upon a note and foreclose a mortgage given on real estate to secure the payment of this note. A trial was had to the court without a jury, which resulted in a judgment for the amount prayed for and a decree of foreclosure.

The plaintiffs in error attempted to appeal from This judgment and decree; but the record shows upon its ■face that there were three exhibits- introduced' and admitted in evidence, over the objection of the plaintiffs in -error, and they are not in the record filed in this case. These exhibits are material evidence, and, to review the questions attempted to be raised .by this appeal, it is essential that this court examine this evidence. But, since it is not here, we cannot do this; and, the presumption Being in favor of the correctness of the judgment, we ■recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  