
    Rodger HANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Robert OWENS, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-6915
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: December 15, 2016
    Decided: December 20, 2016
    Rodger Hanson, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Young Moore & Henderson, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodger Hanson appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motions for summary judgment in this civil rights action, denying Hanson’s motion to appoint counsel, and denying his motiop to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hanson’s motion to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hanson v. Owens, No. 5:14-ct-03078-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2014; Feb. 10, 2015; Oct. 16, 2015; June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  