
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Abel ESTRADA-AMBRIZ, a.k.a. Jose Abel Ambriz Estrada, a.k.a. Jose Abel Ruiz, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 11-10336.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 26, 2012.
    
    Filed July 2, 2012.
    Ian Garriques, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jose Abel Estrada-Ambriz, Post, TX, pro se.
    Carolyn Phillips, Esquire, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Abel Estrada-Ambriz appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Estrada-Ambriz’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Estrada-Ambriz has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Estrada-Ambriz filed a pro se notice of appeal over nine months after the district court entered judgement. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as untimely. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)®.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     