
    Sharp and Tuttle against Young and Young.
    Affidavit is judgment,' and'obligations, but in no- other cases 
    
    VANARSDALE moved for leave to enter judgment a warrant of attorney, unaccompanied by bond, and without affidavit: the statute requiring the affidavit UP0U all confessions of judgment, having been repealed ; and the affidavit being now required only in cases of . , , , , , , ,. .. ,, judgments upon bonds and obligations; other cases being left, as they were, before the passage of the statute, requiring the affidavit. See statute, 24th February 1820.
    
      
      
         See Acts of 1829—92. Parker vs. Griggs, 1 South. 163. Cliver vs. Applegate, ante 479. Woodward ads. Cook, 1 Hal. 160. Burroughs vs. Condit, 1 Hal. 300. Latham vs. Lawrence, 6 Hal. 322. Evans vs. Adams, 3 Gr. 373. Melville vs. Brown, 1 Har. 363. Reading vs. Reading, 4 Zab. 358. Dean vs. Thatcher, 3 Vr. 470.
      
    
   Court.

Let the judgment be entered, upon the warrant of attorney, without affidavit.  