
    Reinaldo MARTINEZ-JARACUARO, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 03-72639.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 2005.
    Decided March 24, 2005.
    Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo a Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Donald E. Keener, Esq., Alison R. Drucker, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: ALARCÓN, SILER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Reinaldo Martinez-Jaracuaro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, which denied his request to stay deportation proceedings pending consideration of his motion to re-serve and ordered him deported. As the parties are familiar with the facts and additional arguments, they are not repeated here.

In February 1997, Martinez-Jaracuaro pled nolo contendere to the offense of assault by force to commit bodily injury in violation of California Penal Code § 245(a)(1). Martinez-Jaracuaro’s offense was punishable as either a felony or a misdemeanor; however, because the state trial judge never declared that he was convicted of a misdemeanor, he was convicted of a felony. See People v. Bozigian, 270 Cal.App.2d 373, 379, 75 Cal.Rptr. 876 (1969) (“Unless and until a misdemeanor sentence is imposed, a conviction for an offense alternatively punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony, remains a felony for all purposes.” (citation omitted)). Accordingly, this court dismisses Martinez-Jaracuaro’s petition for lack of jurisdiction because he was convicted of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) (court lacks jurisdiction to review a final order of removal if alien is an aggravated felon); Ocampo-Duran v. Ashcroft, 254 F.3d 1133, 1134-35 (9th Cir.2001) (one-year sentence for violation of California Penal Code § 245(a)(1) constituted an aggravated felony).

Although it was not briefed, the issue of whether Martinez-Jaracuaro is eligible for relief under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act was raised during oral arguments. The parties were directed to provide supplemental letter briefs. After consideration of their respective letter briefs, the court concludes that Martinez-Jaracuaro is ineligible for § 212(c) relief. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.44(c) & (k)(1).

PETITION DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     