
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Malcolm Eugene FLOURNOY, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-40683 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed February 21, 2017
    Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Malcolm Eugene Flournoy, Pro Se
    Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Malcolm Eugene Flournoy has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flournoy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     