
    Jackie Marie BRUMBAUGH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dale J. MONTGOMERY, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 72763.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 24, 1998.
    Dale J. Montgomery, pro se.
    Kent W. Fanning, St. Peters, for respondent.
    Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and WILLIAM H. CRANDALL Jr., J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Dale J. Montgomery appeals from a judgment awarding Jackie Brum-baugh $26,000 actual damages and $26,000 punitive damages for sexual assault. Montgomery, appealing the judgment pro se, argues that the trial court erred in (1) awarding the plaintiff a judgment when there was no medical evidence of damages, (2) refusing to appoint an attorney for Montgomery, and (3) allowing the trial to proceed without a jury.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  