
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Saul ANCHONDO, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-50517 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed April 18, 2017
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, ■ U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Saul Anchondo, Pro Se
    Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Saul Anchondo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Anchondo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.
     
      
      . Counsel contends that a claim for ineffective assistance of trial counsel exists but recognizes that a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is the appropriate method for raising this claim. We agree with the latter assessment and therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review, See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
     