
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio LLAMAS-RODAS, aka Arturo Rojas, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 00-10581.
    D.C. No. CR-00-00037-ECR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 14, 2001
      
      .
    
    Decided May 30, 2001.
    
      Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Sergio Llamas-Rodas appeals the sentence imposed following- his guilty plea to one count of illegal entry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Citing the principles announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Llamas-Rodas contends that he was deprived of his due process right to notice of the crime to which he was charged when the district court imposed a sentence based on a prior felony conviction that was neither pled in the indictment nor admitted during the plea hearing. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503, — L.Ed.2d — (2001).

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     