
    ABEEL v. MUSE.
    
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas.
    April 26, 1911.)
    Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; Marshall Sur-ratt, Judge. Action by J. A. Muse against Alfred Abeel. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Sleeper, Boynton &. Kendall, for appellant. W. L. Eason, for appellee.
    
      
       writ of error denied by Supreme Court.
    
   KEY, J.

This is a personal injury suit, and the second time that it has come to this court. A statement of the nature of the case will be found in the opinion of • Mr. Justice Rice in 124 S. W. 430. At the last trial the plaintiff recovered, and the defendant has appealed. The only question presented for decision is the contention that the undisputed testimony shows that the accident which caused appellee’s injury was a risk assumed by him as appellant’s employs, and that for that reason the trial court should have given a requested instruction directing a verdict for appellant, and, not having done so, should have set the verdict aside and awarded a new trial. We have read and considered the testimony, and have reached a conclusion adverse to the contention referred to. Judgment affirmed.  