
    WELLS ET AL. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (St. Joseph),
    39 M., 21.
   To compel respondent to allow a set-off of one judgment against another, which he refused on account of a dispute as to rights of attorney and assignee.

Denied June 11, 1879.

Held, that mandamus does not lie to review the discretion of a circuit judge; that his denial of the motion was not a bar to proceedings in equity.  