
    No. 19.
    Armis, plaintiff in error, vs. Barker, defendant in error.
    Stubbs, for the defendant in error, joined' issue with a.protestan-do, excepting on the ground that the citation in this case notified the defendant to appear at a Supreme Court, to be holden at Macon on the second Monday in February next, pursuant to a writ of error filed in the Clerk’s office of the Superior Court of the county of “Baldwin,” instead of the county of Bibb, in which latter county the cause was tried.
   Per Curiam,

Warner, J.

Let the citation be amended, so as to correspond with the writ of error, which is properly returnable-before this Court.  