
    Stanford MORRIS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 71936.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 10, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 20, 1998.
    Dorothy Mae Hirzy, Clayton, for movant-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Ann R. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-eonviction relief "without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  