
    Urschel v. Urschel et al.
    (No. 22968
    Decided June 17, 1931.)
    
      Mr. Charles O’Neil, Messrs. Rupp & Hahn and Messrs. Tracy, Chapman ds Welles, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Fraser, Iliett, Wall & Effler and Mr. Robert Newbegin, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.’

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.  