
    Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Salvador Barberi, by his next friend, Antonio Barberi, Defendant in Error.
    
    Opinion filed May 7, 1918.
    A Writ of Error to a Judgment of the Court of Record within and for the County of Escambia.
    
      Blount & Blount & Carter and Clement Blount, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      John P. Stokes and B. R. Coleman, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term thereof upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Court of Record be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Browne, C. J., took no part.  