
    7322
    JONES v. WOODSIDE COTTON MILLS.
    New Trial. — An appeal from an order granting a new trial will not be entertained except in a case in which judgment absolute might be rendered by this Court.
    Before DeVore, J Greenville, . December, 1908.
    Affirmed.
    Action by R. H. Jones against Woodside Cotton Mills, in magistrate’s court. From Circuit order, setting aside judgment of magistrate, plaintiff appeals.
    
      Mr. J. R. Martin, for appellant,
    cites: Was question of magistrate’s charge on facts before Circuit Court? 358, Code of Proc.; 25 S. C., 381; 22' S- E., 767; 38 S, E., 226; 13 S. E., 332. Charge tipon undisputed facts: 81 S. C., 5, 161; 25 S. E., 806; 68 S. C., 392-; 73 S. C., 233. .Hypothetical statement in charge: 25 S. E., 808.
    
      Mr. B. A. Morgan, contra,
    cites: A magistrate is a Judge under Con., art. V, sec. 26: 58 S. C., 94.
    October 19, 1909.
   The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Jones.

This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Court remanding the case to' the magistrate for a new trial.

As-this is not a case in which judgment absolute could be rendered by this Court, an appeal from an order granting a new trial will not be entertained. Lampley v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry., 77 S. C., 319, 57 S. E., 1104; Pace & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry., 83 S. C., 33; DesChamps v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry, 83 S. C., 192; Dixon v. Seaboard A. L. Ry., 83 S. C., 393.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.  