
    Cleveland Bar Association v. Lavallo.
    [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Lavallo (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 308.]
    (No. 93-843
    Submitted June 15, 1993
    Decided September 15, 1993.)
    
      
      Michael E. Murman, E. John Brzytwa and Dale LaPorte, for relator.
    
      Frank J. Lavallo, Jr., pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Six months of that year are suspended, however, and respondent is to be placed on monitored probation for a period of two years after serving the six months’ actual suspension. Moreover, respondent must make restitution to Scarcelli before resuming practice under monitored probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J.,' A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.  