
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Eugene WILLIAMSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-6284.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 16, 2011.
    Decided: June 20, 2011.
    Darryl Eugene Williamson, Appellant pro se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Eugene Williamson appeals the district court’s judgment denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williamson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williamson, No. 1:97-cr00181-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  