
    Spradlin v. Spradlin, et al.
    (Decided May 19, 1916.)
    Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court.
    Appeal and Error — Absence of Brief — Presumption.—In the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked on appeal, it will be presumed that no error exists, and that the judgment is correct.
    JAMES H. SPRADLIN for- appellant.
    W. W. WILLIAMS for appellees.
   OPINION. OF THE COURT BY

WlLLIAM ROGERS CLAY, Commissioneb,

Affirming.

In this ease no brief has been filed by appellant. In the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked, it will be presumed that no errors exist, and that the judgment is correct. Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Ry. Co., 167 Ky. 422, 180 S. W. 532; Continental Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441, 169 S. W. 855; Crawford v. Wiedemann, 158 Ky, 333, 164 S. W. 981; Brown v. Daniels, 154 Ky. 267, 157 S. W. 3.

Judgment affirmed.  