
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Branlett Eugene KIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 00-10354.
    D.C. No. CR-99-40162-DLJ.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 17, 2003.
    
      Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Branlett Eugene Kimmons appeals his conviction and 110-month sentence imposed after his jury trial for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)(d).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Kimmons has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Kimmons has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     