
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Joseph Eugene IRVING, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-30155.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00393-BJR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.
    
    Decided Oct. 19, 2005.
    Andrew C. Friedman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Joseph Eugene Irving, Sheridan, OR, pro se.
    Before T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Joseph Eugene Irving appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Irving has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Irving has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal is denied.

The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the sentence is REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     