
    Karl Izakovic, Appellant, v. Nicholas Roch, Respondent.
   In view of the fact that there was no showing on the part of the landlord as to the nature of the change necessary to remove the violation, or as to the expense of making such change, the determination is unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.  