
    (71 South. 931)
    No. 21945.
    WILSON v. YAZOO & M. V. R. CO. In re YAZOO & M. V. R. CO.
    (May 22, 1916.)
    
      (Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)
    
    Certiorari <&wkey;5(l) — Prohibition <&wkey;3(2) — •Remedy by Appeal.
    A case involving the overruling by the trial court of exceptions to the manner in which citation was-'served is appealable, so that certiorari and prohibition will not lie.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Certiorari, Cent. Dig. § 5; Dec. Dig. <@=>5(1); Prohibition, Cent. Dig. §§ 5, 6; Dec. Dig. <&wkey;>3(2).]
    Action by Bessie Wilson against the Yazoo & .Mississippi Talley Railroad Company. Judgment 'for plaintiff, arid defendant applies for writs of certiorari and prohibition.
    Application denied.
    Hunter C. Leake, of New Orleans, and Harvey E. Ellis, of Covington (Chas. N. Burch and H. D. Minor, both of Memphis, Tenn., of counsel), for relator.
   PROVOSTY, J.

An exception to the mannér' in- which 'citation was. served was over.ruled by the trial court; and defendant applies to this court for the writs of certiorari and prohibition. The case is appealable, and the trial court has jurisdiction of it; therefore the remedy is by appeal, and the said writs will not lie. State ex rel. Jennings v. Miller, Judge, 109 La. 704, 33 South. 739; Iberia v. Morgan’s L. & T. R. & S. S. Co., 129 La. 492, 56 South. 417; State ex rel. La. Trust Savings Bank v. Board of Liquidation, 135 La. 571, 65 South. 745.

Application denied, at the cost of relator.  