
    United States Paper Company, Respondent, v. Hugh De Haven, Appellant.
    First Department,
    November 5, 1906.
    Pleading—bill of particulars —particulars of terms of contract and special damage granted.
    When the plaintiff sets out a contract by defendant to sell and deliver certain. goods for a specified period, and that the plaintiff relying on such contract entered into contracts with other persons to sell goods to be manufactured out of the goods to be delivered by the defendant, but that by reason of the defendant’s breach the plaintiff was unable to carry out its sales, etc., the defendant under a general denial is entitled to a bill of particulars, setting out the contract with the defendant, and also the names of the persons to whom the plaintiff agreed to sell and deliver goods, aiid the items of special damage sustained.
    - Appeal by the defendant, Hugh De Haven, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 2d day of July, 1906, denying the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars.
    
      John E. Walker [John Hill Morgan with him on the brief], MoKeen, Brewster & Morgan, attorneys, for the appellant.
    
      Jacob I. Wiener of counsel [Charles Firestone, attorney], for the respondent.
   Clarke, J.:

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is engaged in the sale of metal twisted wire straps amongst other things, and that the defendant is engaged in the manufacture of steel and iron box straps; that plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing wherein and whereby the defendant agreed to furnish the plaintiff twisted wire in cut lengths for a specified period at certain agreed prices; that plaintiff, relying on said agreement, sold and agreed to deliver a large quantity of box straps of such kind and nature as the defendant agreed to sell and deliver to the plaintiff, of all of which the.said defendant had knowledge; that the said straps were sold to the plaintiff by the defendant at prices which left the plaintiff a wide margin of profit; that the defendant neglected and refused to comply with the- terms of this agreement or to furnish to plaintiff said straps and still refused and neglected to furnish the same; that the plaintiff, relying on said agreement, prepared itself to engage and did engage in the selling in large quantities of wire straps of. such kind as the. defendant agreed to furnish:; that the plaintiff did sell a large quantity and-was -able to sell a large, quantity of wire straps, but was unable to carry out the sale or 'effect others on account of defendant’s failure, neglect and refusal to comply with said agreement; that on account of the condition of the wire strap ■ market and such condition being rendered so by the defendant, plaintiff was unable to obtain wire straps in cut lengths and was unable to fill its orders or continue in the strap business, to fhe detriment, loss and damage to the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000, for which, it demanded judgment.

Defendant made a motion for a bill of particulars, which motion - was denied, and from the order entered thereon this appeal is taken.

The defendant having denied the making of the written contract alleged in the complaint or any,knowledge of the terms thereof,, is entitled to a copy thereof..- (Rhodes v. Adams, 113 App. Div. 304.) Plaintiff having alleged special damages in the complaint by reason of its inability to perform contracts made upon faith of the agreement with the defendant; -the defendant is entitled to a bill-of particulars giving the names and addresses of the parties who are • alleged to have made contracts with it. (Mussinan v. Willner Wood Co., 69 App. Div. 448.) “ The defendant was entitled to have a bill of particulars of the special damage claimed to have been sustained by the plaintiff.” (Royle v. Goodwin, 98 App. Div. 95.) Therefore, the plaintiff should be required to give the names of the persons, firms or corporations to whom it alleges it sold and agreed to deliver box straps and with whom it engaged" to sell box straps as set forth in paragraphs 3, 4, T .and' 8, and ' a. statement of the items- of damage sustained as set forth in . paragraph 9 of- the complaint, as to the orders, it was unable to fill

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and a motion granted as indicated, with ten dollars costs.

O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham, Laughlin and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted as indicated in opinion, with ten dollars costs.  