
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-6755.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 25, 2014.
    Decided: Sept. 30, 2014.
    Mark Clifton, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Clifton appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his supplemental petition alternatively seeking relief pursuant to a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr00062-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  