
    W. J. GRANTHAM v. EDNA MARLOWE
    20 So. (2nd) 500
    January Term, 1945
    January 12, 1945
    Division A
    
      Francis M. Holt, Harry T. Gray and Marks, Marks, Holt, Gray & Yates, for appellant.
    
      John E. Teate, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this case have been examined. The primary questions raised turn on the interpretation of the evidence. A careful examination of all the evidence fails to convince us that the trial court committed error.

Affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.  