
    WINIFRED SMITH, Appellant, v. KARL M. SMITH, Respondent.
    St. Louis Court of Appeals,
    March 5, 1912.
    The opinion of the Springfield Court.of Appeals in this case (151 Mo. App. 649) is adopted as the opinion of the court.
    Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. James E. Withrow, Judge.
    Reversed and remanded.
    
      
      Pearce, Davis é Gurlee for appellant.
    
      T. J. Rowe, Thos. J. Rowe, Jr., and Henry Roioe for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.-

-The appeal in this case was prosecuted to this court, hut was thereafter transferred by it to the Springfield Court of Appeals under the provisions of the act of the Legislature, approved June 12, 1909. [See Laws of Missouri 1909, p. 396; see, also,Sec. 3939, R. .S. 1909.]' In due time the cause was disposed of by. the Springfield Court of Appeals through an opinion prepared by Judge Cox of that court, as-will appear by reference to Smith v. Smith, 151 Mo. App. 649, 132 S. W. 312. Subsequently, the Supreme Court declared the said legislative act, which purported to authorize the transfer of cases from this court to the Springfield Court, to be unconstitutional. The cause was thereafter transferred by the Springfield Court of Appeals to this court on the theory that the jurisdiction of the appeal continued to reside here and the proceedings had in the Springfield Court with reference thereto were coram non judice.

The case has been argued and submitted here and duly considered. Upon reading the record and considering the arguments, we are persuaded that the opinion of the Springfield Court, above referred to, properly disposes of the controversy, and it is adopted as the opinion of this court. For the reasons given ,ln that opinion the judgment will he reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.  