
    Connelly v. Carlin et al.
    
    1. Answer nr chancery. A sworn answer in chancery is not evidence when it is not demanded in the petition. Following Sheppard v. Ford, 10 Iowa, 502,
    
      Appeal from Dubugue District Court.
    
    Friday, June 18.
    Bill to set aside a sale made for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding creditors. Decree for the plaintiff, and defendants appeals.
    
      Clark and Beach and Austin Adams for the appellant.
    
      Wilson, Utley & Doud for the appellees.
   Baldwin, C. J.

The only question in this case is, whether a certain conveyance, made by one Kearns to the respondent Carlin, was fraudulent. The complainant alleges that it was, and prays that the same may be set aside. The respondents answer under oath, and deny the allegation of fraud. It is claimed by appellant that the answer thus sworn to cannot be overcome by the testimony of one witness. Under the ruling of this court, in the case of Shepherd v. Ford, 10 Iowa, 502, a sworn answer to a bill in chancery is not evidence, unless called for by the complainant

The answer of respondents in the case, not being called for by tbe complainant, is not evidence, but only puts in issue the averments of tbe bill.

Tbe testimony introduced by tbe complainant clearly establishes a fraudulent intent upon tbe part of tbe grantor, Kearns, in making tbe deed, and that Carlin knew it was not made in good faith when be purchased.

Affirmed.  