
    Misselbeck v. Greime, appellant.
    
      Evidence — admissions.
    
    A witness for plaintiff, who had testified to an admission by defendant, was asked upon cross-examination: “ How much did defendant say he owed plaintiff at that time and in that conversation ?” Held, that the question was proper, and not in conflict with the rule in Mouse v. Whited, 25 N. Y. 176.
    
      S. W. Jackson, for appellant.
    
      T. S. Westbrook, for respondent.
   P. Potter, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. The opinion is devoted to a review of the evidence, and contains nothing of importance for publication not embraced in the head note,

Judgment affirtned.  