
    Reginald RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 93992.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 21, 2010.
    
      Jessica M. Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Reginald Riley, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).  