
    DADE DRYDOCK CORPORATION, a self-insurer, and Corporate Group Service, Inc., Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. Charles A. STOREY and the Florida Industrial Commission, an administrative agency, Respondents, Cross-Petitioner.
    No. 34618.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 6, 1966.
    Rose & Marlow, Miami, for petitioners-cross-respondents.
    L. Barry ICeyfetz and Williams & Ja-bara, Miami, for Charles A. Storey, respondent-cross-petitioner.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 9, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the respondent’s petition for allowance of attorney’s fees, be and the same is hereby granted in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.-00).

THORNAL, C. J, and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ, concur.  