
    Guy DENSON, Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, Respondent.
    No. ED 86392.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 7, 2006.
    Andrew H. Marty, St. Peters, MO, for Appellant.
    Beverly E. Temple, Office of the St. Charles County Counselor, St. Charles, MO, for Respondent.
    Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Guy Denson (Claimant) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) award denying Claimant request for workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant contends the Commission erred in denying him benefits because the award is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Claimant also argues the Commission erred in allowing a Functional Capacity Evaluation report as evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. After reviewing the whole record, we find the Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not contrary the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 223 (Mo. banc 2003). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  