
    ROCHESTER SAV. BANK, Respondent, v. FOLTZ et al., Appellants. COMMERCIAL BANK, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants (two cases).
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    December 9, 1898.)
    Actions by the Rochester Savings Bank and the Commercial Bank against Moses Foltz and Beaman Catto.
   No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order appointing receiver affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements in one case. See 54 N. Y. Supp. 764.  