
    ARNOLD v. SPRING et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    July 8, 1913.)
    Action by George S. Arnold against Rex Spring and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment (135 N. Y. Supp. 314) reversed, and new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the judgment appealed from is erroneous in the following particulars: First, plaintiff is not entitled to a lien for the value of the undelivered stove wood; second, plaintiff’s lien attaches to all_ the wood and _ logs remaining upon the plaintiff’s lands, and is not limited to an undivided one-half thereof; third, plaintiff’s lien is limited in amount to the value of said wood and logs, less the expense incurred by defendants in cutting and piling the same.  