
    LARKIN et al., Respondents, v. BUTTE & BOSTON CONSOLIDATED MINING CO. et al., Appellants.
    (No. 1,530.)
    (Submitted April 15, 1903.
    Decided April 27, 1903.)
    
      Appeal — Briefs—Huleé of Supreme Court — Affirrhance.
    where appellants’ brief fails wholly to comply with Subdivision 3 of Rule K of the Supreme Court, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
    
      Appeal from, District Court, Silver Bow■ County; William ■Clancy, Judge.
    
    ActioN by Clara A. Larkin and another against the Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Company and others. Erom an order appointing a receiver, defendants appeal.
    Affirmed.
    
      Messrs. Forhis & Evans, for Appellant.
    
      Mr. Charles B. Leonard, and Messrs. Cullen, Day & Cullen, for Respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The brief filed by the appellants in this action fails in every particular to comply with Subdivision 3 of Rfule X of this court, and, upon the authority of Casey v. Thieviege, 27 Mont. 516, 70 Pac. 755, and cases cited, the order appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.  