
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Noe CONSTANZA-CORDON, also known as Noe Biganza, also known as Emigdio Ortiz Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 17-40437 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed February 20, 2018
    
      Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Noe Constanza-Cordon, Pro Se
    Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Noe Constanza-Cordon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Con-stanza-Cordon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is riot precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     