
    THUM, Respondent, v. ISERMANN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 28, 1900.)
    Action by George Thum against Samuel Isermann. From an order refusing to open a default judgment, except on specified terms, defendant appealed to the general term of the New York city court, and from an affirmance (54 N. Y. Supp. 559) he appeals. Affirmed. Ashley, Emley & Rubino, for appellant. Zeller & Miehling, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

An answer was requisite. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.  