
    Casparus C. Hoes and wife and others, appellants, v. John M. Van Hoesen, respondent.
    (Decree affirmed.)
    H. Hogeboom, for appel-
    lants, A. L. Jordan, for respondent.
   In this case it was decided that the reversionary interest in the personal estate was the primary fund for the payment of the legacies which were made chargeable by the testator’s will upon the devisees of the reversionary interest in the real estate. The reversionary interest in the personal estate not having been disposed of by the will. (Reported, 1 Comstock, 120.)  