
    ESTATE OF Fernando SAUCEDA; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS and North Las Vegas Police Department, Defendants, and Jeffrey Pollard, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-17518
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted January 9, 2017
       San Francisco, California
    Filed July 11, 2017
    
      Eckley Martin Reach, Trial Attorney, Eckley M. Reach, Chtd., Las Vegas, NV, Robert Ellis Murdock, Esquire, Murdock & Associates, Chtd., Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiffs-Appellees
    Robert Wilson Freeman, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants
    Robert Wilson Freeman, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1539, 198 L.Ed.2d 52 (2017).

Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
     