
    Anna Cross, Respondent, v. Margaret Cross and Others, Appellants.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the question of the competency of the witness Mary Rudes under section 347 of the Civil Practice Act was not sufficiently raised, and the evidence supports the findings. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.  