
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime VASQUEZ-CARBAJAL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-50684.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 6, 2006.
    
    Filed Nov. 15, 2006.
    Becky S. Walker, Esq., Brian D. Hershman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    James H. Locklin, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jaime Vasquez Carbajal appeals the sentence following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Vasquez Carbajal contends that the district court erred in considering his prior conviction for purposes of enhancing his sentence because the fact of the prior offense was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that we continue to be bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres v. US., 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), that a judge may enhance a sentence on the basis of prior convictions, even if the fact of those convictions was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt); see also United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2006) (rejecting the contention that the holding of AlmendarezTorres is limited to cases where a defendant has admitted his prior convictions during a guilty plea).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     