
    Jonas Isabel CRUZ-LUSTRE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 09-71139.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.
    
    Filed Sept. 29, 2010.
    Jonas Isabel Cruz-Lustre, Escondido, CA, pro se.
    Oil, Daniel I. Smulow, Trial, Paul F. Stone, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Le-Fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jonas Isabel Cruz-Lustre, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

Contrary to Cruz-Lustre’s contentions, the family unity waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(ll) is not available to aliens seeking to establish good moral character for the purposes of cancellation of removal. Sanchez v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1028, 1032 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc).

Cruz-Lustre’s contention that the agency violated due process by not considering the hardship in the aggregate is not supported by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     