
    21533.
    Duke v. The State.
    Decided July 14, 1931.
   Luke, J.

The defendant’s conviction in this case was entirely dependent upon circumstantial evidence, and the evidence did not meet the legal requirements. Therefore the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., eoneurs. Bloodworth, J., absent 011 account of illness.

Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error.

¡Lamar Gamp, solicitor, contra.  