
    Marcel KIMELMAN and Aron Kalisz, Appellants, v. Alfred ELLENBOGEN and Evelyn S. Ellenbogen, Appellees.
    No. 89-1197.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 10, 1990.
    Donald S. Rose, Miami, for appellants.
    Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti and Martin L. Hoffman, North Miami Beach, for appel-lees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment under review is set aside and the cause remanded for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and to make a finding as to whether the motion and notice of hearing was actually timely received by counsel for the appellants. See Hammett v. Hammett, 510 So.2d 632 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Moses v. Bystrom, 489 So.2d 834 (Fla.3d DCA 1986). If timely notice was received, the judgment shall be reinstated. If there is a determination to the contrary, the judgment shall remain vacated. Moses v. Bystrom, 489 So.2d at 836.  