
    Scott R. Edwards, Respondent, v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc., Appellant.
   In our view, an examination of the defendant for the purpose of framing a eomplaint is not necessary in the circumstances here disclosed. So far as the production of the contract is concerned, it now appears that a copy has been furnished to plaintiff. Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and the motion denied. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.  