
    KROSCHEWSKI v. STATE.
    (No. 5206.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 29, 1919.)
    Criminal law &wkey;>1131(l) — Dismissal of appeal.
    Where appellant files a sworn application to dismiss appeal, made in accordance with law, and showing appellant’s desire for dismissal, appeal will be dismissed.
    Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. S. Anderson, Judge.
    Conrad Kroschewski was convicted of using seditious language with reference to the United States in its recent war with Germany, and he appeal^.
    Appeal dismissed.
    W. C. Linden and Joe H. H. Graham, both of San Antonio, for appellant.
    B. P. Looney, Atty. Gen., C. M. Cureton, Asst. Atty. Gen., D. A. McAskill, Dist. Atty., of San Antonio, and E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted under an indictment charging him with using seditious language with reference to the United States in its recent war with Germany. He prosecuted Ms appeal to tMs court, where the case is now pending.

He now files before the court a sworn application to dismiss said appeal. Upon an inspection of this sworn motion it is found to be in accordance with the law, and shows appellant’s desire in the matter, and will be granted.

The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed. 
      <@=>For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     