
    In the Matter of Christine Jiminez, Appellant, v Maureen Jiminez, Respondent.
    [868 NYS2d 895]
   In a custody proceeding between a parent and a nonparent “ ‘the parent has a superior right to custody that cannot be denied unless the nonparent establishes that the parent had relinquished that right due to surrender, abandonment, persistent neglect, unfitness, or other like extraordinary circumstances’ ” (Matter of K.F.T. v D.P.G., 54 AD3d 1044, 1044-1045 [2008], quoting Matter of Wilson v Smith, 24 AD3d 562, 563 [2005]; see Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543, 549-550 [1976]). Absent proof of such extraordinary circumstances, an inquiry into the best interests of the child is not triggered (see Matter of K.F.T. v D.P.G., 54 AD3d 1044 [2008]).

Here, the Family Court’s determination that the stepmother failed to establish extraordinary circumstances has a sound and substantial basis in the record and, thus, will not be disturbed (see Matter of Tolbert v Scott, 42 AD3d 548, 549 [2007]; Matter of Cambridge v Cambridge, 13 AD3d 443, 444 [2004]; compare Matter of Gilchrest v Patterson, 55 AD3d 833 [2008]; Matter of Cockrell v Burke, 50 AD3d 895 [2008]; Matter of West v Turner, 38 AD3d 673, 674 [2007]; Matter of Dellolio v Tracy, 35 AD3d 737 [2006]; Matter of Wilson v Smith, 24 AD3d 562, 563 [2005]; Matter of Campo v Chapman, 24 AD3d 439 [2005]). Skelos, J.R, Santucci, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.  