
    Julia Kibiuk, Appellant-Respondent, v. Windsor Residences, Inc., Appellant, and Dry Dock Savings Institution, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    February 20, 1945.
    
      
      Alfred S. Julien and Theodore Kamens for plaintiff-appellant and respondent.
    
      Mordecai Goldberg and Irving Segal for defendant-appellant.
    
      William E. Lyons for defendant-respondent.
   Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s proofs do not fully sustain her alleged cause of action.

On appeal by defendant Windsor Besidences, Inc., the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to said appellant to abide the event.

Appeal from the order should be dismissed.

On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly. 
      
       See, also, Rufo v. South Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 268 App. Div. 1057, and cf. McCabe v. Cohen, 268 App. Div. 1064.— [Rep.
     