
    (93 South. 63)
    YATES v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 928.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 18, 1922.)
    Criminal law <&wkey;!023(l I) — Judgment held insufficient to support appeal.
    A judgment, setting out the verdict and adjudging that the statfe recover against defendant, but containing no adjudication of guilt, MM insufficient to authorize an appeal.
    Appeal from Morgan County Court; W. T. Lowe, Judge.
    William C. Tates was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    The judgment appealed from contains no adjudication of guilt, but, following the verdict of the jury, it says as follows:
    “And the same being considered by the court, it is .considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the state of Alabama, for the use of Morgan county, have and recover of the defendant.”
    E. C. Nix, of Albany, for appellant.
    Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.
    Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.
    Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

As there is no judgment contained in this record which authorizes an appeal to this court, we are without authority to pass upon the questions raised by the record. Our only prerogative is to dismiss the appeal,’which is accordingly done. See W. C. Yates v. State (8 Div. 899), ante, p. 435, 93 South. 62.

Appeal dismissed. 
      d&wkey;For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     