
    Patrick RIDDELL, Petitioner, v. JACOBSON & COHEN, P.A., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Jacobson, Cohen & Cohen, Individually, et al., Respondent.
    No. 93-0727.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 4, 1993.
    Philip M. Burlington of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., and Eric H. Luckman, of Liggio & Luckman, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
    No response required for respondents.
   ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

STONE, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

I agree with the majority to deny rehearing and I write separately only to note that the underlying discovery order compels production of the files and materials in the lawyer’s possession pertaining to the original claim out of which this malpractice action arose. There is nothing in the request to produce or order compelling production that would require the disclosure of communications or material prepared on the legal malpractice claim.  