
    CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASINO WEST, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-17309.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 2011.
    Filed June 16, 2014.
    James Wayne Bradshaw, Esquire, McDonald Carano Wilson, LLP, Reno, NV, H. Douglas Galt, Esquire, Woolls & Peer a Professional Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Scott A. Glogovac, Esquire, Gregory J. Livingston, Esquire, Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appel-lee.
    Before: LUCERO, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Century Surety Company appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment on the basis that its policy exclusions were ambiguous.

On April 6, 2012, we certified two questions of Nevada law to the Nevada Supreme Court: “(1) Does the pollution exclusion in Century’s insurance policy exclude coverage of claims arising from carbon monoxide exposure? (2) Does the indoor air quality' exclusion in Century’s insurance policy exclude coverage of claims arising from carbon monoxide exposure?” Century Sur. Co. v. Casino W., Inc., 677 F.3d 903, 905 (9th Cir.2012).

On May 29, 2014, the Nevada Supreme Court filed its answers to the certified questions. We need not restate the facts of this case or the reasoning of the Nevada Supreme Court set forth in Century Sur. Co. v. Casino W., Inc., No. 60622, — Nev. -, 329 P.3d 614, 2014 WL 2396085 (May 29, 2014). Pursuant to the state high court’s opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     