
    4739.
    Brooke v. Georgia Peruvian Ochre Company.
    Decided September 23, 1913.
    Complaint; from city court of Cartersville — Judge Foute. Jan-, uary 11, 1913.
    
      Finley & Henson, for plaintiff. Neel & Neel, for defendant.
   Russell, J.

The permission granted by the defendant to the plaintiff to use a portion of the defendant’s land for agricultural purposes was subsequent to the delivery of the unconditional warranty deed by the plaintiff, conveying the same premises to the defendant; and, so far as appears from the record, this permission was given without consideration. A verdict in favor of the defendant was therefore demanded, and errors in the charge, if any, were immaterial. No material error was committed in the admission of testimony. Judgment affirmed.  