
    HAMIL v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 3, 1912.)
    Ceiminal Law (§ 1094) — Appeal—Record— Bills of Exceptions.
    Where the motion for new trial alleges no reason for reversal which can be considered, unless supported by bills of exceptions and statements of fact, a conviction must be affirmed, in the absence of a statement of fact or bills of exception.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1094.]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Harris County; C. W. Robinson, Judge.
    Stennit Hamil was convicted of crime, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for rape upon a girl under 15 years of age. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. The motion for new trial alleges no reason for reversal of the judgment that could be considered, in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.  