
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ivan CARVAJAL, also known as Esco, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-20087
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    July 10, 2014.
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Ivan Carvajal, Bruceton Mills, WV, pro se.
    Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ivan Carvajal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Carvajal has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Carva-jal’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Carvajal’s motion to proceed pro se, to file a supplemental brief, and for release of the record and exhibits is DENIED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
     