
    Plant Manufacturing Corporation, Appellant, v. Henry Renner et al., Individually and as Copartners, under the Firm Name of Renner & Maras, Respondents.
    (Argued May 27, 1926;
    decided July 9, 1926.)
    
      Contract ■— principal and agent — action to recover on alleged contract of' agency — complaint dismissed on ground contract too indefinite, speculative and vague.
    
    
      Plant Mfg. Corp. v. Renner, 214 App. Div. 606, affirmed.
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 8, 1926, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term. The action was to recover for an alleged breach of a contract of agency. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the alleged contract was too indefinite, speculative and vague and created no obligation.
    Judgment affirmed, with costs;
    
      Louis W. Severy for appellant.
    
      Henry M. Stevenson and Henry B. Culver for respondents.
   no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.  