
    Toni L. Reinhardt nee Herbst, Respondent, v. Evelyn Schuster, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    July 6, 1948.
    
      Theodore Nevins for appellant.
    
      Lawrence Braunstein and Werner Rosenberg for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Essentially the respondent’s action is based on a promise of marriage; therefore, the action is not maintainable. (Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N. Y. 685, affg. 263 App. Div. 884.) Judgment and order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hammer, Hoestadter and Eder, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.  