
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abraham GONZALEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-10357.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.
    
    Filed Oct. 4, 2010.
    Robert A. Bork, Assistant U.S., Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Adam McMeen Flake, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Rene Valladares, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Abraham Gonzalez-Lopez appeals from the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from the 9-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gonzalez-Lopez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because, among other things, the district court did not give adequate weight to his mitigating factors. The district court did not procedurally err in imposing Gonzalez-Lopez’s sentence. See United States v. Ressam, 593 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir.2010); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). Moreover, in light of the totality of the circumstances, including Gonzalez-Lopez’s extensive criminal record and immigration history including five deportations, his within guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also Carty, 520 F.3d at 991-93.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     