
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Antonio GOMEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-10558.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00807-1-JMR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted June 13, 2003.
    
    Decided June 19, 2003.
    Before RYMER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Juan Antonio Gomez-Lopez appeals his conviction and sentence following a guilty-plea conviction for one count of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) with an enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Gomez-Lopez’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record on the ground that she failed to discover any arguable issues on appeal. Gomez-Lopez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     