
    Nathaniel DAILY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D15-1534.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 6, 2016.
    Nathaniel Daily, in proper person.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before SHEPHERD, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.
   ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Daily has filed eléven' post-conviction petitions or appeals with this court since 1996. The majority of these filings appear to’be frivolous. - On October 12, 2015, this court issued an opinion dismissing Daily’s latest appeal.' Our opinion contained an order to show cause why Daily should not be prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se appeals, petitions, motions, or other proceedings related to his convictions and sentences in circuit court case number 93-15636A. Daily filed a response' to ■ the show cause order on October 28, 2015. His response provides no new information or argument for our consideration.

“[A]ny citizen, including a citizen attacking his or her conviction, abuses the right to pro se . access ,by filing repetitious and frivolous, pleadings, thereby diminishing the ability of the courts to devote their finite resources to the consideration of legitimate claims.” State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999), This concern must be balanced against a defendant’s pro se right to access to courts. Id. (“[Djeny-ing a pro se litigant the opportunity to file future petitions is a serious sanction, especially where the litigant is a criminal de-fendant_”). Thus, a court may sanction a party for repetitious and frivolous pleadings by prohibiting further filings from that party only after an order to show cause and the opportunity to answer. Id.

Upon consideration of Daily’s eleven post-conviction filings before this court, and his response to this court’s order to show cause, we conclude that Daily has not demonstrated good cause to justify his actions. Based on his repeated attempts to abuse the judicial system with frivolous appeals or petitions, it is hereby ordered that the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal shall refuse to accept further pro se filings related to case number 93-15636A, unless the filings have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing. Any further unauthorized pro se filings by Daily will subject him to sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for consideration by it of disciplinary action. See § 944.279(1), Florida Statutes.

Order issued.  