
    10816.
    King v. The State.
    Decided November 4, 1919.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in connection with the charge as a whole, shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. Under the facts of the ease, the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ.} concur.

Indictment for larceny of horse; from Bibb superior court— Judge Mathews. July 17, 1919.

John R. Cooper, W. 0. Cooper Jr., for plaintiff in error.

John P. Ross, solicitor-general, contra.  