
    Bolton and Another v. Burnett.—In error.
    
      Saturday, November 23.
   A SEALED note, executed by James A. Bolton ¿nd William Brown, was payable to William Burnett and Daniel Hankins. Hankins assigned his interest in the note to Burnett. Held, that the assignment was valid, and that Burnett might sustain a suit on the note against the makers in his own name. Sneed v. Mitchell, 1 Hayw. R. 289.  