
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cristobal MEZA, III, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-10302
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Feb. 21, 2014.
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Seth Kretzer, Law Offices of Seth Kret-zer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Cristobal Meza, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Meza has filed a response with an incorporated motion to dismiss the appeal. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Meza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Additionally, Meza’s pro se motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED as moot. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     