
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Stephen MACK, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-11555 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed December 21, 2017
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern .District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Stephen Mack, Pro Se
    Before DAVIS," CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Stephen Mack has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mack has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Mack’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s .motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5,4.
     