
    LUSK, Respondent, v. LEE et ah, Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 27, 1907.)
    Action by Fred Lusk against Fred Lee and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held that under the circumstances of this case it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in denying the motions.

SPRING and ROBSON, JJ., dissent.  