
    Davis v. Moore.
    April 14, 1911.
    Complaint for damages. Before H. H. Dean, judge pro hac vice. Lumpkin superior court. July 26, 1910.
    
      Johnson & Johnson, for plaintiff.
    
      O. J. Lilly and Howard Thompson, for defendant.
   Holden, J.

While some of the charges complained of may have been slightly inaccurate, none of them embody harmful error against the .plaintiff requiring a new trial. The evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict in favor of the .defendant, and no error appears requiring a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

A ll the Justices concur.  