
    LAURA O’NEILL, RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 11, 1927
    Decided May 16, 1927.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 926.
    For the respondent, Paul M. Salsburg.
    
    For the appellant, William Charlton.
    
   Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.  