
    SUGGS v. STATE.
    (No. 4273.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 1, 1916.)
    Ckiminal Law <&wkey;1144(14) — Appeal — Presumption.
    In the absence of statement of facts and bill of exceptions, it will be presumed that the charge presented the law, and all of it, applicable to the evidence.
    [Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see- Criminal Law, Gent. Dig. §§ 2767, 2901, 3032; Dec. Dig. <&wkey;>1144(14).]
    Appeal from Tarrant County Court; Jesse M. Brown, Judge.
    
      Harry Suggs was convicted, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    O. O. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of vagrancy in the county court of Tarrant county, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, we must presume the court presented the law, and all the law, applicable to the evidence in his charge.

The judgment is affirmed. 
      <S=M?or other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     