
    Argued February 28,
    affirmed March 5, 1929.
    OAKLEY SMITH v. H. L. CHAPIN.
    (274 Pac. 1098.)
    For appellant there was a brief over the n°ame of Mr. E. L. McDougal with an oral argument by Mr. Randall S. J ones.
    
    For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Vinton & Tooze and Mr. Eugene E. Marsh with oral arguments by Mr. Walter L. Tooze and Mr. W. T. Vinton.
    
   PER CURIAM.

This is the companion case to Agee v. Chapin, ante, p. 526 (274 Pac. 1097), and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in that case.

Affirmed.  