
    Sandow v. City of Cincinnati.
    (No. 22983
    Decided June 17, 1931.)
    
      Mr. Sol Goodman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. John D. Ellis, city solicitor, Mr. Francis T. 
      
      Bartlett andlifr. Harry J. Wernke, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and tbe same is hereby, dismissed for tbe reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day and Kinkade, JJ., concur.  