
    Faizah Nailah DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 47, a Unincorporated Association, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-55314
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted January 18, 2017 
    
    Filed JANUARY 30, 2017
    Faizah Nailah Dean, Pro Se
    Tanya Avila Guzman, Esquire, Southern California Edison Company, Legal Division, Rosemead, CA, for Defendant-Appel-lee Southern California Edison Co.
    Jonathan Michael Cohen, Attorney, Rothner, Segall & Greenstone, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellee International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
    Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Faizah Nailah Dean appeals pro se from the district court’s order rejecting Dean’s fourth post-judgment motion for relief from the district court’s order granting summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to deny a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Casey v. Albertson’s Inc., 362 F.3d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting Dean’s Rule 60(b) motion where Dean failed to file it “within a reasonable time”. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 (c); Ashford v. Steuart, 657 F.2d 1053, 1055 (9th Cir. 1981) (setting forth factors to determine whether a Fed. R, Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(3) motion has been filed within a “reasonable time”; where the time for a direct appeal has passed, “the interest in finality must be given great weight”).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     