
    JONES v. JONES.
    Marriage — Annulment—Evidence.
    Finding of trial court that plaintiff and defendant had entered a valid common-law marriage, and dismissal of action for annulment, held, correct where the reeord shows ample evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that there was an agreement to enter a common-law marriage.
    Beperence por Points in Headnote
    4 Am Jur 2d, Annulment of Marriage § 43.
    Appeal from Oakland, Adams (Clark J.), J.
    Submitted Division 2 April 2, 1968, at Lansing.
    (Docket No. 2,814.)
    Decided June 27, 1968.
    Complaint by John Jones against Alberta Jones for annulment of common-law marriage. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Lynn V. Hooe, Jr., for plaintiff.
    
      Wilfred G. Bice and O. Lee Molette, for defendant.
   T. Gr. K avan age, J.

Plaintiff brought action for annulment maintaining that the common-law marriage asserted by defendant was defective. After a trial the court held that there had been a valid common-law marriage and denied plaintiff relief.

The appeal claims there was no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that there was agreement to enter a common-law marriage. We have examined the record and find ample evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion.

Affirmed, with costs to appellee.

Lesinski, C. J., and Foley, J., concurred.  