
    Michael David BAILEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 88448.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    March 20, 2007.
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Michael David Bailey, appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-con-vietion relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2). 
      
      . The movant’s motion to file supplemental record on appeal is granted.
     