
    Hinkle v. Story et al.
    
    May 13, 1895.
    Brought forward from the last term.
    Levy and claim. Before Judge Fish. Sumter supe, rior court. May term, 1894.
    Fort & Watson, for plaintiff in error.
    L. J. Blalock and W. P. Wallis, contra.
    
   Lumpkin, J.

There was no legal merit in the motion for a continu-, anee; and as, under the facts in evidence, the property levied on was manifestly, and beyond doubt, subject to the plaintiffs’ exe* cution, there was no error in directing a verdict accordingly.

Judgment affirmed,.  