
    Ellis v. The State of Ohio et al.
    (No. 33232
    Decided January 28, 1953.)
    
      Mr. John Francis, for petitioner.
    
      Mr. C. William O’Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Larry B. Snyder, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains, and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St., 313, 29 N. E. (2d), 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St., 375, 89 N. E. (2d), 651; In re Pullins, 155 Ohio St., 171, 98 N. E. (2d), 11 In re Ames, 155 Ohio St., 184, 98 N. E. (2d), 2; In re Stewart, 156 Ohio St., 521, 103 N. E. (2d), 551.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur.  