
    H. L. Hatton, Appellant, v. Eugene B. Patton, and Myrtle M. Patton, His Wife, and J. L. Humphreys and Sarah Humphreys and Sarah Humphreys, His Wife, Appellees.
    
    Division A.
    Decision filed December 5, 1928.
    
      McGune, Gasey, Hiaasen and Fleming, Attorneys for Appellant;
    
      Baxter, Byrd and Walton, Attorneys for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of tbe decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed. •

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.  