
    King v. The State. Martin v. The State.
    
      Pred B. Osgood, for the plaintiffs.
    
      Solicitor and James W. Remiche for the state.
   Per Curiam

The facts are substantially the same as in Sylvester v. State, 65 N. H. 193;—see, also, Philpot v. State, 65 N. H. 250, and Leonard v. State, 65 N. H. 671.

Petitions denied.

All concurred. 
      
      ' See foot-note on page 80.
     