
    OVERTON v. STATE.
    (No. 10699.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 19, 1927.)
    1. Criminal law @=>l 104(3) — -Statement of ftiets should not be incorporated in transcript, under rules of court.
    Incorporation of statement of facts in transcript, on appeal, is violation of rule of court.
    2. Criminal lav/ <S=>1023(9)— Appellate Court has no jurisdiction, in absence of sentence.
    In the absence of a sentence, the Court of Criminal Appeals has no jurisdiction.
    Appeal from District Court, Somervell County; Irwin T. Ward, Judge.
    E. J. Overton was convicted of possessing equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    S. G. Tankersley, of. Glen Rose, for appellant.
    Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.
   LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction in district court of Som'ervell county of possessing equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts seems to be incorporated in the transcript herein, which is in violation of the rules of the court. However, an examination of the transcript shows that same contains no sentence. In the absence of a sentence, this court is without jurisdiction. The appeal will be dismissed. 
      <g=»For other eases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     