
    RICHARDSON v. STATE.
    (No. 5106.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 28, 1918.)
    1. Criminal Law €=>1090(1) — Appeal — Scope.
    Where the record on appeal from conviction of burglary is without bill of exceptions or exceptions to the charge of court, the court is limited to the question made by the motion for new trial, that the evidence is insufficient.
    2. Burglary <§=>42(1) — Evidence — SUFFICIENCY.
    Evidence that a house was burglarized and property taken, and that a short.time thereafter accused was found in possession of the stolen goods and pawned them, is sufficient to connect the accused with the burglary.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
    George Richardson was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and allotted two years in the penitentiary.

The record being without bills of exception, or exceptions to the charge of the court, we are relegated to the question made by the motion for new trial, that the evidence is' insufficient. We deem it unnecessary to state the testimony, but conclude, from a careful revision of the evidence, the jury was justified in reaching their conclusion.

The house was burglarized and the property of the owner taken. A short time after the 'burglary, appellant was found in possession of the stolen goods, and pawned them. The evidence we think is sufficient to connect the appellant with the burglary under the authorities, and the judgment will be affirmed.  