
    THOMAS TONKS AND HARRY TONKS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM F. MULLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 29, 1907 —
    Decided March 2, 1908.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Biker •& Biker.
    
    For the defendants in error, Pitney, Hardin & Skinner.
    
   Pee Curiam.

An examination of the record discloses no error prejudicial to the plaintiff in error. The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.

For reversal — None.  