
    HENSCHEL v. HARLEM REPORTER CO. et al.
    (Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
    January 18, 1893.)
    Action by Haufman Henschel against the Harlem Reporter Company and others.
    Argued before SEDGWICK, 0. J., and DUGRO and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.
    Charles W. Dayton, for appellant.
    William G. McCrea, for respondents.
   DUGRO, J.

A careful examination of the papers fails to show_ any improper exercise of discretion by the court at special term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129. Order affirmed, with §10 costs.  