
    REHM et al., Appellants, v. WEISS, Respondent.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    October 23, 1894.)
    Action by Carl Rehm, and others against William S. Weiss. Ernest H. Ball, for appellants. Charles Goldzier, for respondent.
   NEWBURGER, J.

This court at general term (May, 1894), on a former appeal, having held that “there was no privity of contract or estate between plaintiffs and defendant (28 N. Y. Supp. 772), the trial justice properly dismissed the complaint. Judgment affirmed.  