
    Agustin MEDINA and Eva Medina, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTH ATLANTIC & CARIBBEAN LINE, INC. and Colon & Villalon, Inc., Defendants.
    Civ. No. 328-71.
    United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
    Jan. 24, 1972.
    Roberto Martinez Rodriguez, Arecibo, P. R., for plaintiffs.
    Jiminez & Fuste, San Juan, P. R., for defendants.
   ORDER

TOLEDO, District Judge.

This is an action in admiralty and maritime jurisdiction filed originally in the District Court of Puerto Rico, Arecibo Section, pursuant to the Saving to Suitors Clause contained in 28 U.S.C.A. § 1333, and removed therefrom to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1441 and 1337, since this case involves issues arising under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 1300 et seq., and the United States Harter Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 190 et seq., which are Acts of Congress enacted to regulate commerce, and pursuant to South Atlantic and Caribbean Line, Inc.’s long form of bill of lading, which incorporate said Act of Congress as permitted by statute.

The facts of the case from the standpoint of this summary judgment incident appear not disputed from the file of the case and from the documents filed by the defendants with their Motion for Summary Judgment and accompanying affidavits. A shipment of cargo arrived in Puerto Rico on the 17th day of April 1969, allegedly damaged, and suit was not instituted by the cargo interest, in this case the plaintiffs, up to and until more than one year had elapsed from the time of delivery, thus the action is time-barred pursuant to Section 1303 (6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 1303(6) and Clause 19 of South Atlantic and Caribbean Line, Inc.’s bill of lading. Said clause has been held valid in Empacadora Puertorriqueña de Carnes, Inc. v. Alteraran Transport Line, Inc. and South Atlantic and Caribbean Line, Inc., 303 F.Supp. 474 (D.C.1969).

The defendant’s long form bill of lading provides as follows in its Clause Paramount:

“This bill of lading shall have effect subject to the provisions of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of the United States, approved April 16, 1936, which shall be deemed to be incorporated herein and nothing herein contained shall be deemed a surrender by the carrier of any of its rights or immunities or an increase of any of its responsibilities or liabilities under said Act. If any term of this bill of lading be repugnant to said Act to any extent, such term shall be void to that extent but no further. The provisions stated in said Act (except as may be otherwise specifically provided herein) shall govern before the goods are loaded on and after they are discharged from the ship and throughout the entire time the goods are in the custody of the carrier . . . ” (Italics ours).

Said incorporation is valid by virtue of Section 1312 of said Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 1312, which expressly permits incorporation of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act between ports of the United States and its possessions and other United States ports, that is, in coastwise traffic. Rhode Island Insurance Co. v. Pope & Talbott Lines, 78 D.P.R. 454 (1956); Globe Solvents Co. v. The California, 167 F.2d 859 (3 Cir., 1948); Waterman S.S. Corp. v. U. S. Smelting, Refining & Mining Co., 155 F.2d 687, cert. den. 329 U.S. 761, 67 S.Ct. 115, 91 L.Ed. 656 (1946). In turn, Section 1303(6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 1303(6) provides:

“In any event the carrier and the ship shall be discharged from all liability in respect of loss or damage unless suit is brought within one year after delivery of the goods or the date when the goods should have been delivered

In turn Clause 19 of South Atlantic & Caribbean Line, Inc.’s bill of lading provides :

“19. In any event the Carrier and the ship shall be discharged from all liability in respect of loss or damage unless suit is brought within one year after the delivery of the goods or the date when the goods should have been delivered. Suit shall not be deemed brought until- jurisdiction shall have been obtained over the Carrier and/or the ship by service of process or by an agreement to appear.”

Said Clause has been held valid in light of Section 1303(6) in domestic traffic in the case of Empacadora Puertorriqueña de Carnes, Inc. v. Alter-man Transport Line, Inc. and South Atlantic & Caribbean Line, Inc., supra.

It being an undisputed fact that the present action was filed after more than one year had elapsed from the time of delivery contrary to the dispositions of Section 1303(6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act and Clause 19 of South Atlantic & Caribbean Line, Inc.’s bill of lading the present action is time-barred as to co-defendant, South Atlantic & Caribbean Line, Inc. and summary judgment ought to be entered on its behalf. Zifferer v. Atlantic Line, Ltd., 278 F.Supp. 736 (D.C.1968); Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RR Co., 320 U.S. 356, 64 S.Ct. 128, 88 L.Ed. 96, cited with approval in M.V.M. Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 156 F.Supp. 879 (D.C.1957); Burdines, Inc. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp., 199 F.2d 571 (5 Cir., 1952); United States v. The South Star, 210 F.2d 44 (2 Cir., 1954); Gulf Puerto Rico Lines, Inc. v. Maicera Criolla, 309 F.Supp. 539 (D.C.1969).

As to the responsibility of co-defendant Colón & Villalón Inc., under a contract of maritime transportation as the present one it will suffice to say that the doctrine res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet is of application here, that is, that the contracts will only have effect between the parties to it; specifically, it has been decided by this court in Gulf Puerto Rico Lines, Inc. v. Maicera Criolla, supra, that an agent for a shipping company is not responsible for damages under a maritime contract for transportation.

In view of the foregoing:

It is ordered, that summary judgment be and hereby is entered in favor of the defendant, South Atlantic and Caribbean Line, Inc.  