
    (73 South. 770)
    No. 22311.
    STATE v. JACKSON.
    (Jan. 15, 1917.)
    
      [Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)
    
    Criminal Law <&wkey;1023(8) — Appeal—Final Judgment.
    Appeal does not lie from judgment overruling accused’s motion to quash his indictment; it not being a final judgment.
    [Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2591; Dec. Dig. <@=»1023(8).]
    Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Concordia; N. M. Calhoun, Judge.
    Thomas L. Jackson was indicted, and from judgment overruling his motion to quash the indictment, he appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Dale, Young & Dale, of St. Joseph, for appellant. A. V. Coco, Atty. Gen., and Jos. M. Reeves, Dist. Atty., of Vidalia (Hugh Tullís, of Vidalia, and Vernon A. Cooo, of Marksville, of counsel), for the State.
   PROVOSTY, J.

Accused moved to quash the indictment on the ground that the event upon which the charge is founded occurred in another parish; and he has appealed from the judgment overruling this motion.

An appeal will lie only from the final judgment. Marr. Crim. Juris. 887.

Appeal dismissed.  