
    Sterling v. Sterling.
    (No. 21709
    Decided May 29, 1929.)
    
      Messrs. Braucher <& Sterling, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Black, McCuskey, Buff & Souers, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.  