
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven RIZZO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-50447.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 5, 2009.
    John R. Kraemer, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marc Carlos, Esquire, San Diego, CA, for DefendanWAppellant.
    Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Steven Rizzo appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bringing an illegal alien into the United States without presentation and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rizzo contends that the district court failed to adequately explain the reasons for the sentence imposed and failed to adequately consider and address the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, particularly his mitigating personal history and characteristics. He also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93, 996 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Rizzo’s motion to amend his reply brief is granted.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     