
    James Hunter v. Samuel Parsons.
    A. having contracted to purchase lands of B. paid part of the purchase money, but titles were never made: A. gave the land to his son C, who went into possession: Held, that his possession was adverse both as to A. and B. and that declarations by A. subsequent to the gift to C, that he did not hold adversely to B, were inadmissible in an action of trespass by B. against C.
   Per O’Neall J.

confirming the decision of Mr. Justice Evans, at Laurens, Fall Term, 1830.

Johnson J. and Harper J. concurred.  