
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel CORNEJO-RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Manuel Rodriguez-Cornejo, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-10665.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 8, 2014.
    
    Filed April 10, 2014.
    Christina Marie Cabanillas, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jill Elayne Thorpe, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Manuel Cornejo-Rodríguez, pro se.
    Before: BENAVIDES, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Fortunato P. Benavides, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Manuel Cornejo-Rodríguez (“Rodriguez”) appeals from the judgment revoking his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     