
    SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. J. Terry DEASON, et al., Respondents.
    No. 82399.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 10, 1994.
    Marshall M. Criser and William W. Deem, Mahoney, Adams & Criser, P.A., Jacksonville, and Harris R. Anthony, Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., Miami, for petitioner.
    Robert Vandiver, Gen. Counsel and Richard D. Beliak, Associate Gen. Counsel, FL Public Service Com’n., Robert A. Butter-worth, Atty. Gen. and Michael A. Gross, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Jack Shreve, Public Counsel, Charles J. Beck, Deputy Public Counsel and Janis Sue Richardson, Associate Public Counsel, Office of Public Counsel, Tallahassee, on behalf of Citizens of State of FL, for respondents.
   McDonald, justice.

Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company petitions for review of Public Service Commission (PSC) order number PSC-93-1214-FOF-TL, which clarified two previous PSC orders directing Southern Bell to produce documents. We addressed the original orders in Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Deason, 632 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1994). In Southern Bell, we specifically addressed the issues of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine as they relate to the documents requested by the PSC and the Office of Public Counsel. Because the parties have now settled their case, we dismiss the petition.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

HARDING, J., did not participate. 
      
       The orders clarified were orders PSC-93-0292FOF-TL and PSC-93-0517-FOF-TL.
     