
    Anna J. Heasty, Plaintiff, v. Frank Lambert, Defendant.
    
      Submission of a controversy—failure of a party to a/rgue his side of the case— • when the submission will be dismissed because thereof
    
    
      Semble, that the provisions of section 1279 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, relative to the submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, do not contemplate the entry of a judgment by default or upon the failure of one of the parties to the controversy to appear upon the argument to argue his side of the alleged dispute before the Appellate Division either orally or by a printed brief.
    In the present case the Appellate Division, in view of the nature of the question presented by the submission, which involved the rights and interests of parties who were not before the court, and in view of the failure of the defendant to argue his side of the case orally, or to submit a printed brief, deemed it proper to dismiss the submission.
    Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
    
      Charles S. Taber [Alfred E. Sander with him on the brief], for the plaintiff.
    
      Charles C. Sufren, for the defendant.
   Hirschberg, P. J.:

This purports to be the submission of a real controversy relating to the validity of a local assessment for the improvement of Coney Island avenue, in the borough of Brooklyn. The plaintiff, as the owner of certain real property on that avenue, contracted to sell it to the defendant, and he has refused to perform on the ground that the assessment constitutes an incumbrance. A decision is sought upon the question whether the title offered is free from the lien of the assessment, but we do not think we should determine the alleged issue inasmuch as the defendant makes default, by neither arguing the matter orally or by making and filing a printed brief.

As the case is made up there is room for but one conclusion, viz., that the assessment is without validity. The persons interested in its enforcement and collection, however, are not parties to the controversy, and no reason appears why the defendant, if he had nothing to urge against the title offered him, should not take the proffered deed or submit to a default in an action prosecuted in the regular form. We do not think that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (§1279 et seq.) relating to the submission of a controversy upon admitted facts contemplate the entry of a judgment by default or upon the failure of one of the litigants to appear upon the trial to urge his side of the alleged dispute. The requirement of an affidavit that the controversy is in fact real would seem to be inconsistent with such a possible result. ■

At all events the court prefers to be assured by the presence and argument of the parties that the controversy presented is indeed genuine. In view of the nature of the question herein presented, involving rights and interests of others who are not before the court, and in view of the default of argument or brief on behalf of the defendant, we deem it proper to dismiss the submission, but without costs.

All concurred.

Submission dismissed, without costs.  