
    No. 12,197.
    Metropolitan Bank et. als. vs. Commercial Soap, Candle and Starch Manufactory.
    A suspensive appeal will lie from a judgment appointing a receiver to a corporation.
    A PPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Paris of Orleans Monroe, J.
    
    
      Dinkelspiel & Hart for Plaintiffs, Appellees.
    
      W. S. Benedict for Defendant, Appellee.
    
      Rice & Montgomery for Intervenor, Appellant.
    Submitted on briefs June 22, 1896.
    Opinion handed down June 22, 1896.
    Rehearing refused June 30, 1896.
    Dismissed by consent November 2, 1896.
   On Motion to Dismiss.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment appointing a receiver. A suspensive appeal was taken. The motion to dismiss is on the ground that the judgment appealed from was one which should be provisionally executed, notwithstanding the appeal, and therefore no suspensive appeal would lie therefrom.

Some judgments, notwithstanding the suspensive appeal, are provisionally executed. These are named in Art. 580, paragraphs 1 and 2, C. P., and Art. 1059, C. P.

The appeal for the appointment of a receiver to a corporation is not enumerated, and is therefore excluded.

The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.  