
    Fred Walker and Others, Respondents, v. Edward Winters and Gillis Winters, Appellants.
   Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented on the ground that exceptions to the charge and to the reception of evidence present reversible errors, particularly in the charge that the defendants were required, to use the best mechanical appliances and contrivances known in that locality, designed to prevent the escape of sparks and live coals.  