
    Before the Second Division,
    September 3, 1959
    No. 63322.
    protest 58/16944 (New York).
    W. A. Lee Co. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the article in question is chiefly used for agricultural purposes and that it is not specified by name in any of the dutiable provisions of the tariff act or in any modification thereof, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.  