
    9851.
    Osterholtz v. The State.
    Decided October 14, 1918.
    Accusation of unlawful possession of liquor; from city court of Savannah—Judge Kourke. April 20, 19Í8.
    
      Robert L. Golding, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Walter G. Hartridge, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodwoetii, J.^

The accused was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, and this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based on general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.  