
    Byron O. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D01-4347.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 16, 2005.
    Appellant, pro se.
    Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   On The Court’s Oum Motion

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte withdraw our pre-man-date opinion in this case and substitute the following.

The summary denial of the appellant’s postconviction motion is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court to permit the appellant a reasonable opportunity to demonstrate his claim is timely under Dickey v. State, 30 Fla. L. Weekly D443, —So.2d-, 2005 WL 350313 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.15, 2005), by alleging the date his present conviction was enhanced by the challenged conviction. Cf. Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579 (Fla.2004). If no amendment is filed within the time allowed, then the denial can be with prejudice. Id., Spooner v. State, 889 So.2d 900, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.  