
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Clemente HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-40245
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 26, 2010.
    James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Clemente Hernandez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Bishop, 603 F.3d 279, 281-82 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 272, 178 L.Ed.2d 180 (2010), which held that the imposition of a condition of supervised release ordering Hernandez “to participate in a mental health program as deemed necessary and approved by the probation officer” did not constitute plain error. The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     