
    Marcus Carlice KING v. STATE of Alabama.
    CR-01-0247.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Sept. 27, 2002.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 2002.
    Certiorari Denied Jan. 24, 2003 Alabama Supreme Court 1020340.
    Stephen R. Glassroth, Montgomery, for appellant.
    William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Robin Blevins, asst. atty. gen., for appel-lee.
   BASCHAB, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., concurs; COBB, J„ concurs in the result, with opinion; SHAW and WISE, JJ., concur in the result.

COBB, Judge,

concurring in the result.

I write specially to point out that I believe Part III addressed in the majority’s unpublished memorandum to be properly preserved for appellate review. Additionally, I do not wish to be characterized as condoning the prosecutor’s actions in Part III. However, after a review of the record, I realize that Marcus Carlice King suffered no prejudice, because the witness testified that the prosecutor’s comments did not in any way change his testimony. Accordingly, I concur only in the result.  