
    No. 40930.
    Protest 933148-G of S. Lisk & Bro. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the match cases in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), Dow v. United States (21 C. C. P. A. 282, T. D. 46816), and United States v. Friedlaender (id. 103, T. D. 46445) cited.  