
    Ex parte WATSON.
    (No. 10612.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 10, 1926.)
    Bail <&wkey;49 — Homicide on express malice necessary for denial of bail held not shown hy evidence.
    Evidence held not to show homicide on express malice necessary before bail can properly be denied.
    Appeal from District Court, Coleman County; J. O. Woodward, Judge.
    C. W. Watson was indicted for murder. From an order, denying bail on habeas corpus, he appeals.
    Reversed, and bail granted.
    Mark McGee, of Brownwood, and Critz & Woodward, of Coleman, for appellant.
    Walter U. Early, Dist. Atty., of Brownwood, Dibrell & Snodgrass, of Coleman, and Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Relator is under indictment for murder charged with killing Jack Me-Math. Upon habeas corpus hearing before the judge of the Thirty-Fifth judicial district, bail was denied, from which order this appeal is prosecuted. The killing occurred on the public street in Coleman. The meeting between the parties was brought about by deceased. His manner in accosting relator was j such as caused a party who was with relator in his automobile to leave the car anticipating trouble. Proof is also in the record before us that deceased had, some two weeks before the homicide, made threats to kill relator unless he left town. The exact threats had not been communicated, but relator had been advised to keep away from deceased to avoid trouble. We think it unnecessary to set out the evidence in detail. From a careful examination of it, we are not impressed that the state has shown by proof evident a killing upon express malice, which has been held necessary before bail can properly be denied. Ex parte Francis, 91 Tex. Cr. R. 398, 239 S. W. 957; Ex parte Hicks, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 450, 254 S. W. 1109.

Judgment remanding relator without bail is reversed, and bail granted in the sum of $7,500.  