
    DAVID CONKLIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 17, 1927
    Decided October 17, 1927.
    For the appellants, Elmer W. Romine.
    
    For the respondent, Charles A. Raihhun.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.  