
    FINK et al. v. CHEYENNE SHORT LINE R. CO. et al.
    
    No. 7903.
    Opinion Filed March 14, 1916.
    (155 Pac. 308.)
    
      Error from District Court, Roger Mills County; T. P. Clay, Judge.
    
    Action by D. N. Fink, trustee, and others, against the Cheyenne Short Line Railroad Company and others. From the judgment, the parties first mentioned bring error.
    Dismissed.
    
      Clark J. Tisdel, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      E. L. Mitchell and Perry Madden, for defendánts in error..
   PER CURIAM.

On September 17, 1915, the district court of Roger Mills county appointed a receiver for the Cheyenne Short Line Railroad Company, and on June 14, 1915, plaintiffs in error filed their motion to vacate said order of appointment, which motion was on that day overruled, and plaintiffs in error were allowed sixty days in which to prepare and serve a case-made, and defendants in error were given twenty days thereafter in which to suggest amendments; the case-made to be settled upon five days’ notice. The case-made was served on defendants in error on August 14, and filed in this court December 11, 1915. The cause is now before us on motion of defendants in error to dismiss, because the appeal was not perfected within the time fixed by law.

This identical question was passed- upon in Lamb v. Alexander, 45 Okla. 573, 146 Pac. 443, where in the syllabus we said: “Under section 4986, Rev. Laws 1910, appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver or refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver must he taken within ten.days from the date of the order appealed from, by filing a petition in error in this court within said time limit.” The law there stated controls this case, and this appeal should be dismissed.

It is so ordered.  