
    Edward Bickford v. The People.
    
      Amendment of information.
    
    An information charging the accused with breaking and entering a shop and office by night with intent to steal, without showing whether the premises adjoined a dwelling or were occupied with one, does not allege an offense known to the law, and cannot after judgment be so amended as to show they were not so adjacent or occupied, and sustain a conviction.
    
      Error to Superior Court of Grand Bapids.
    Submitted June 19.
    Decided June 21.
    Burglary. Despondent was convicted as charged.
    
      H. E. Dewey for plaintiff in error.
    Attorney General Otto KircJmer for the People.
   Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are exactly the same as in Byrnes v. People, 37 Mich., 515, and therefore the same judgment of reversal must be entered and for discharge of prisoner.  