
    Howard ORR, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 79793.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 25, 1992.
    
      James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Paolo G. Annino and Anne Moorman Reeves, Asst. Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Orr v. State, 597 So.2d 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d. 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We recently have disapproved Ta-rawneh and approved the rationale adopted by the District Court below. Hayles v. State, 608 So.2d 13 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, the opinion under review is approved.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.  