
    Severino RIVAC and Warlita Rivac, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NDEX WEST, LLC; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-15194
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Filed October 06, 2016 
    
    Megan Dailey, Attorney, Law Ofc of Megan Dailey, Richmond, CA, Michael James Yesk, Esquire, Attorney, Yesk Law, Pleasant Hill, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants
    Joseph James Poppen, Attorney, Bryan Cave LLP, San Francisco, CA, Daniel T. Rockey, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees
    Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Severino and Warlita Rivac appeal the dismissal of their action. The district court issued its decision prior to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp., 62 Cal.4th 919, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 66, 365 P.3d 845 (2016), which held that a borrower had standing to bring a wrongful foreclosure action against the foreclosing party on the grounds that the assignment of the promissory note and deed of trust to the foreclosing party was void. In view of this subsequent California authority, we remand to the district court to reconsider its holding in light of Yvanova. We express no opinion as to the outcome of that inquiry.

REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     