
    Luisa Gallo, Appellant, v. Imer L. Conro and Mildred B. Conro, Respondents.
   Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in her favor directing the fore- ■ closure and sale of the defendants’ farm to satisfy a balance of $133.30 found by a jury to be due on a mortgage owned by her. The only question involved is one of payment. The jury answered that question in defendants’ favor and the trial judge adopted the finding. The evidence sustains the verdict. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present ■ — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenek and Poster, JJ.  