
    The H.C. Miner Lithographing Co., Appellant, v. Thomas Canary et al., Respondents.
    (City Court of' New York, General Term,
    July, 1897.)
    Complaint for services by a corporation, as assignee.
    A ■ complaint which alleges that the assignor of, the plaintiff, at the request of the defendants, rendered to them work, labor and services, and furnished to them materials, all of a reasonble value stated; that the cause of action was duly assigned to the plaintiff, a corporation duly organized under the laws of New York; that payment has been demanded of the defendants, and that they promised to pay but liave. not done so, states a good cause of action and is not demurrable.
    Appear by plaintiff from interlocutory judgment sustaining demurrer to the complaint.
    J. H. Egan, for appellant.
    J. C. Rosenbaum, for respondents.
   Van Wyck, Ch. J.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff’s assignor, at defendants’ request, rendered for them certain work, labor and services, and furnished materials therefor, all of the reasonable value of $684, and that this cause of action was duly assigned to plaintiff, a corporation duly organized under the laws of New York, and that payment of this sum was demanded of defendants, who promised to pay, but same was not paid. This complaint is absolutely good in law, and the'demurrer should have been overruled- instead of sustained. The interlocutory judgment is reversed, with costs, and the demurrer overruled, with costs, with leave to defendants, upon payment of the costs within ten days, to serve an answer.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed, with costs, demurrer overruled, with costs, with leave to defendants, upon payment of costs within ten days, to serve an answer. ■  