
    THARP v. RUFF.
    (No. 985.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.
    June 6, 1923.
    Rehearing Denied June 20, 1923.)
    Appeal from District Court, Henderson County; W. R. Bishop, Judge. Action by T. A. Tharp against R. E. Ruff. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Miller & Miller, of Athens, for appellant. A. B. Coker, of Athens, for appellee.
   WALKER, J.

In effect, this was a boundary suit instituted by appellant against appellee to locate the dividing line between his land on the north and appellee’s on the south. On a trial to the court without a jury, judgment was in favor of appellee. No conclusions of law. and fact were requested, and none filed. The only assignment is that the judgment was without support in the evidence. We have carefully examined the briefs of both parties and the state-' ment of facts, and without quoting the evidence we believe it is sufficient to say that the judgment has' abundant support in the record. The assignment is therefore overruled. Affirmed.  