
    13212.
    Williams et al. v. Swift & Company.
    Decided April 11, 1922.
    Complaint; from Wheeler superior court — Judge Graham. November 19, 1921.
    W. B. Kent, for plaintiffs in error. Eugene Talmadge, contra.
   Luke, J.

This was a suit on three promissory notes, and, under the facts of the ease, it was not error to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiil' for the full amount sued for, less attorney’s fees, or thereafter to overrule the defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  