
    Curtis Nathaniel AUSTIN v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 92-349
    825 S.W.2d 608
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered April 6, 1992
    
      Bill E. Ross, for appellant.
    No response.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant, Curtis Nathaniel Austin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Bill E. Ross, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to.the Committee on Professional Conduct.  