
    In re: Claude THEUS; In re: Diane Theus, Debtors, Claude Theus; et al., Appellants, v. Nancy Knupfer, Chapter 7 Trustee; et al., Appellees.
    No. 05-56216.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted June 14, 2007.
    Filed June 28, 2007.
    David A. Tilem, Esq., Glendale, CA, for Appellants.
    Brad Krasnoff, Esq., Scott Lee, Esq., Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Michelle McCoy Wolfe, Esq., Law Offices of Reyes & Wolfe, Claremont, CA, for Appellees.
    Gary R. Carlin, Carlin & Buchsbaum, Long Beach, CA, pro se.
    United States Trustee, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Claude and Diane Theus appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s order dismissing their appeal. Although the Theus-es tried, they were unable to obtain a stay of the bankruptcy court’s order approving the settlement. As a result, the state court dismissed the employment action. The BAP did not err when it concluded that, given all the circumstances in this case, the Theuses’ appeal is moot. In re Focus Media, Inc., 378 F.3d 916, 922-23 (9th Cir.2004) (“Bankruptcy appeals may become moot----[when] events ... occur that make it impossible for the appellate court to fashion effective relief.”)

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     