
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael INDELICATO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-16970
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted February 16, 2017  San Francisco, California
    Filed February 22, 2017
    Jonas Lerman, J. Douglas Wilson, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, DOJ-USAO, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Timothy Edward Warriner, Attorney, Law Office of Timothy E. Warriner, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before: TASHIMA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
      The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Michael Indelicato appeals the denial by the district court of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We affirm.

Indelicato was convicted of firearms offenses in 1985, and this court affirmed on direct appeal. United States v. Indelicato, 800 F.2d 1482 (9th Cir. 1986) (per curiam). Indelicato provides no valid reasons for waiting until 2014 to collaterally attack his convictions. See United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1004 (9th Cir. 2007). His claims do not rest on newly discovered evidence or a change in the law, and any mis-advice by his lawyers in the mid-1980s cannot excuse his failure to take any action for over 25 years.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     