
    Mabel Shackleford PATTERSON, Petitioner, v. STEVENS MARKET #1 et al., Respondents.
    No. 33825.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 10, 1965.
    Charles F. Lindsay, Miami, for petitioner.
    Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka & Carlton, Charles T. Kessler, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 8, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORN AL and ERVIN, JJ., con-c-ttr.  