
    Farbro Corporation, Respondent, v. A. F. A. Realty Corporation, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
   -Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur: Lazansky, P. J., dissents on the ground that section 586 of the Civil Practice Act does not apply to an action brought by a vendor who has obtained a judgment of specific performance nor to a case where it is brought to impress a vendee’s hen upon real estate that he contracted to buy.  