
    13988.
    Bell v. The State.
    Decided March 6, 1923.
    Accusation of possession of intoxicating'liquor; from city court of Metter — Judge Lanier.' September 20, T922.
    
      Kirkland & Kirkland, for plaintiff in error.
    
      C. W. Turner, solicitor, contra.
   Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; and the evidence, while circumstantial, being sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, the judgment of the court overruling the 'motion for a new trial cannot be controlled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., -concur.  