
    Egvert V. Ross v. State
    191 So. 509
    Division A
    Opinion Filed October 6, 1939
    Rehearing Denied November 2, 1939
    
      Paul Carswell, for Plaintiff in Erfor.
    
      George Couper 'Gibbs, Attorney General, and Thomas J. Ellis, Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam. —

To a judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree, defendant sued out writ of error and, on review, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

The evidence as disclosed by the bill of exceptions has been examined and is found to be amply sufficient to support the judgment.

An examination of the entire record fails to disclose reversible error.

Judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section' 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.  