
    Grayham v. Konkapot.
    Ail affidavit in tie form of that required by the Act of Maryland, of 1729, is sufficient to hold the defendant to bail.
   Mr. Jones, for the defendant, moved to reconsider the order for ruling him to bail. The words of the affidavit are the same as those required by the Act of 1729, and therefore withiri the rule of the Court. The Court were also moved to reconsider the case of Smith et al. v. Watson, [ante, 311,] which they did, and unanimously affirmed the former decision.  