
    No. 46346.
    Protests 902532-G, etc., of Polan, Katz & Co. (Baltimore).
   Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of waterproof cloth in chief value of cotton the same as that the subject of Caesar v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 455, C. D. 515). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable at either 30 or 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 907, as amended by the trade agreements with Belgium (T. D. 47600) and the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753). Protests sustained in part.  