
    James J. Lawler, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant.
   Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the objection to the hypothetical question put to the witness Witmer was improperly overruled and the exception to such ruling was well taken. All concurred, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissented.  