
    Hall vs. Sherwood.
    Motion for retaxation of costs. The plaintiff obtained a ru}e against the defendant for costs on the denial of a mo- ° . . tian, and noticed the costs for taxation before a commissioner in Buffalo. The parties attended, and on the commissioner deciding against some of the items, the plaintiff withdrew the bill and noticed it for taxation before a commissioner in Utica ; who, allowing items which the party deemed objectionable, application was made for a retaxation, which
   The Court ordered, solely on the ground of the irregular and oppressive practice in relation to the taxation, and directed the plaintiff to pay the costs of this motion. Marcy, J., in pronouncing the decision of the court, animadverted with severity upon the conduct of the plaintiff’s attorney, and said, that unless the costs were taxed by the officer to whom the bill was originally brought, the taxation would be set aside as frequently as it was made.  