
    Hiett v. Nebergall.
    
      Practice — Appeals.
    (Decided June 19, 1888).
    Error to the Circuit Court of Auglaize County.
    
      Ferrall & Ollier, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Brotherton & Davis, and Layton & Stueve, for defendant in error.
   By the Court :

An appeal will lie from an order of a probate court overruling a motion of an imbecile ward to terminate the guardianship upon the grounds (1) that letters of guardianship were in the first instance improperly issued, and (2) that if he was an imbecile at the time such 1 etters were issued he has since been fully restored to reason.

Judgment affirmed.  