
    Peter M. Anderson vs. Andrew H. Kittell.
    June 15, 1887.
    Appeal — Defective Return. — The return, upon appeal, not showing the verdict or judgment below, held, that the appellant could not be heard. [Rep.
    Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Young, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
    
      Robert Christensen, for appellant.
    
      Arthur N. Jordan, for respondent.
   By the Court.

The return does not disclose what disposition was made of this case on the trial. It does not contain the verdict, judgment, or decision of the court upon such trial. The record is therefore too incomplete to entitle the appellant to be heard upon his exceptions.

Order affirmed.  