
    Joseph I. Sheridan, Admr. v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America.
    
      Opinion filed October 23, 1907.
    
    Appeals and Errors—Supreme Cotcrt will affirm if no question is presented for review. Upon appeal to the Supreme Court from a judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court, entered upon an appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace, if there was no objection to the evidence in the trial court and no propositions of law submitted, the trial being had upon agreed facts without a jury, there is no question presented for , review by the Supreme Court and the judgment will be affirmed.
    Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Axel Chytraus, Judge, presiding.
    John F. Mahon, for appellant.
    Hoyne, O’Connor & Hoyne, for appellee.
   Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the court:

This suit was brought before a justice of the peace of Cook county by Joseph I. Sheridan, administrator of the estate of George DeQuetterville, deceased, appellant, against the Prudential Insurance Company of America, the appellee, upon a policy of insurance issued by the appellee upon the life of said deceased. The justice rendered judgment against appellee for $85, that being the amount which appeared from the face of the policy to be due. The insurance company appealed to the superior court of Cook county, where the cause was submitted to the court without a jury, upon an agreed state of facts. The finding of the superior court was in favor of the company, and a judgment was entered in conformity with such finding. Sheridan appealed to the Appellate Court for the First District. The cause was assigned to the Branch Appellate Court, and that court affirmed the judgment of the superior court but granted a certificate of importance, and appellant has prosecuted a further appeal to this court.

There were no written pleadings in the case, the hearing in the superior court having been upon an appeal from a justice of the peace. No objection was made in the superior court to the admission or exclusion of evidence,' the cause having been submitted to that court for decision upon an agreed state of facts. No propositions of law were submitted to the superior court to be held as the law of the case. There is therefore no question presented upon this appeal which this court can review. Mutual Protective League v. McKee, 223 Ill. 364, and authorities there collated.

The judgment of the Appellate Court will accordingly be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.  