
    No. P67/177.
    No. P67/178.
    No. P67/179.
    Diebold, Inc. v. United States,
    protest 61/19403 (New York).
    Seedman International Corp. et al. v. United States,
    protests 64/7143,etc. (New York).
    S. Hiller & Co. v. United States,
    protest 66/12058 (New York).
   Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of certain padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.  