
    Charles Pfeil, Appellant, v. August C. Hasselbush and Edward C. Tinker, Respondents.
   Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 766.] The following question is certified: Do the facts set forth in the second paragraph of the amended answer constitute a defense to the cause of action set forth in the complaint? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.; Close, J., not voting.  