
    Otis Michael THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Imam Abdul Mailk SAAFIR; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 07-17037.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted May 8, 2009.
    Filed May 15, 2009.
    Andrew Phillip Bridges, Matthew Alex Scherb, Winston & Strawn, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Otis Michael Thomas, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Trace O. Maiorino, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: HUG, HAWKINS and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Upon de novo review, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the alternative ground that Thomas named the wrong parties. San Jose Christian Coll. v. City of Morgan Hill, 360 F.3d 1024, 1029-30 (9th Cir.2004). Defendants did not have the authority to make the accommodations requested by Thomas. See 15 Cal.Code Regs. § 3211.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     