
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Ralph HENDERSHOT, III, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-30002.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 19, 2010.
    
    Filed Aug. 2, 2010.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

James Ralph Hendershot, III appeals from his 16-month sentence of imprisonment and three-year term of supervised release imposed following his jury-trial conviction for social security fraud in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(4) and theft of federal government money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Contrary to Hendershot’s contention, the imposition of his term of supervised release does not violate the terms of U.S.S.G. § 5Cl.l(d).

We also reject Hendershot’s contention that his term of supervised release was not authorized by statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(a) (“The court ... may include as a part of the sentence ... a term of supervised release after imprisonment”); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b) (for a Class C or Class D felony, not more than three years of supervised release may be imposed).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     