
    Michael McNEILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike RUFFIN, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-7453.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 17, 2009.
    Decided: Nov. 24, 2009.
    Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. Ruffin, No. 1:09-cv-00372-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.  