
    Otis Mack VICKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-3533.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 17, 1997.
    
      Otis Mack Vickson, Wewahitchka, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s successive motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Appellant shall file no more petitions or motions regarding his conviction and sentence in case number CR89-4421. See Johnson v. State, 680 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Helms v. State, 659 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Orr v. State, 657 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Should he do so he will be in contempt of this court and will be subject to punishment, including a sentence of consecutive time. Mobley v. State, 492 So.2d 734 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

It is so ordered.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.  