
    Robert L. LOEH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-55036.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 8, 2005.
    
    Decided Nov. 16, 2005.
    Robert L. Loeh, Royalton, IL, pro se.
    Eugene P. Gordon, Esq., San Diego City Attorney’s Office, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Robert L. Loeh appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens action challenging the search of his off-base residence by six Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents. We dismiss.

The district court did not set forth judgment on a separate document. ‘When a judgment is not set forth on a separate document, then it is deemed entered for purposes of appeal 150 days from entry on the civil docket. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii).” ABF Capital Corp. v. Osley, 414 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir.2005). On March 30, 2004, the district court denied Loew’s request for reconsideration, so judgment was deemed entered on August 27, 2004. Because the United States was a party, the deadline to file a notice of appeal ran 60 days from entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). The time within which to file a notice of appeal therefore expired on or about October 26, 2004. Loeh filed the notice of appeal on January 3, 2005, over two months late.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     