
    ROSAMOND v. MURFF.
    (No. 1623.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.
    April 6, 1916.)
    Appeal and Ek&ok i&wkey;30—Decisions Reviewable— Order oe Judge—Sessions.
    No appeal lies to the Court of Civil Appeals from an order of the judge of the county court npt made at a regular term of court in a proceeding in the nature of a habeas corpus to obtaip custody of a minor child.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. § 105; Dec. Dig. &wkey;>30.]
    Appeal from Van Zandt County Court; R. M. Lively, Judge.
    Proceedings between J. O. Rosamond and J. C. Murff in the nature of a habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child. Judgment for Murff, and Rosamond appeals.
    Dismissed.
    Crawford & Carlisle, of Grand Saline, for appellant. Earl M. Greer and C. L. Stanford, both of Canton, for appellee.
   LEYY, J.

This is a proceeding in the nature of a habeas corpus to obtain custody of a minor child. The proceedings were had on July 5, 1015, which was not at a regular term of the county court. The proceedings in this ease are identical with those in the case of Ex parte Reeves, 100 Tex. 617, 103 S. W. 478, wherein it was decided that no appeal would lie to the Court of Civil Appeals from the order of the judge. Therefore this appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain it. 
      ©=»For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     