
    Paul YONGO, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HARRIS TEETER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 08-1030.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 9, 2008.
    Decided: June 2, 2008.
    Paul Yongo, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Paul Yongo appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. Harris Teeter, Inc., No. 5:07-cv-00092-F, 2007 WL 3353416 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  