
    No. 39152.
    Protests 890053-G, etc., of O. Yoshizawa Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was found that the articles were specially imported for use as sweats in the manufacture of hats, that they are substantially complete except for a process known as reeding, and that they are cut from woven cotton cloth. On the authority of Sand v. United States (T. D. 49594) the claim at 37)4 percent under paragraph 919 was sustained.  