
    (96 South. 464)
    
    (6 Div. 125.)
    WASHINGTON v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA.
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    May 8, 1923.)
    f. Municipal corporations <&wkey;>635 — Prosecution for violation of municipal prohibition ordinance is statutory and quasi criminal in character.
    A prosecution for a violation of a municipal prohibition ordinance is statutory and quasi criminal in nature.
    2. Municipal corporations-<&wkey;642(!.)— Statute obviating necessity for assignment of, error in criminal cases inapplicable to quasi criminal cases.
    Code 1907, § 6264, which obviates the necessity. of assigning error in criminal cases, has no application in quasi criminal cases, '
    other cases see same topic and KE i-NUftlBJL'R in ail Key-iSlumbered Digests and Indexes
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa •County; Henry B. Foster, Judge.
    Monroe Washington was convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of Tuscaloosa, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Foster, Verner & Rice, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant.
    Counsel argue for error on the trial of the case, but in view of the decision v it is not necessary that,the brief be here set'out.
    S. H. Sprott, of Tuscaloosa, for appellee.
    No brief reached the Reporter.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance; the offense charged being the violation of the prohibition ordinances of said city.

There are no assignments of error as the law requires. A prosecution of this character is statutory and quasi criminal in its nature. The statute (Code 1907, § 6264), which obviates the necessity of assigning errors in criminal cases, has no application to appeals in quasi criminal cases. Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 South. 1035.

No questions being presented for review as a result of failure to assign errors on the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

FOSTER, J., not sitting.  