
    Richard M. Bell, Appellant, v. Thomas L. James et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.
    
      Bell v. James, 128 App. Div. 241, affirmed.
    (Argued February 15, 1910;
    decided March 1, 1910.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 4,1908, affirming a j udgment in favor of the respondents herein entered upon a dismissal of the complaint as to them by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action against directors of a savings and loan association to recover damages sustained by plaintiff through a subscription for stock alleged to have been induced by the false representations of defendants.
    
      Edward P. Lyon for appellant.
    
      William Hepburn Russell, A. J. Dittenhoefer, Edwin L. Scofield and Charles A. Deshon for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscook, JJ.  