
    CROFOTT, NIELSEN & CO. v. McKINNEY et al.
    No. 10868.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    March 15, 1945.
    
      Harold W. Mattingly, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Joshua R. H. Potts and Eugene Vincent Clarke, both of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
    Avery M. Blount and Betty B. Gillette, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
    Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends that the evidence of the use of appellant’s patent as substantially against the public interest does not support the finding to that effect. We do not agree.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.  