
    Peter HALLORAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Todd THOMAS, Warden—Saguaro Correctional Center; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-17274.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 12, 2014.
    
    Filed May 16, 2014.
    Peter Halloran, Eloy, AZ, pro se.
    Jamie Dennise Guzman, Rachel Love, Daniel Patrick Struck, Esquire, Managing Senior Counsel, Struck, Wieneke & Love, PLC, Chandler, AZ, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.
    Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff Peter Halloran appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     