
    OASE s-APPEALS-
    Jan. 7.
    Rice, &c. v. Commonwealth.
    APPEAL EROM LAWRENCE COUNTY COURT.
    Appeals erom county court to Court oe Appeals not allowed. The law authorizing appeals in certain cases from the j udgment of a county court directly to the Court of Appeals was repealed by the adoption of the General Statute, sec. 2, art. 22, chap. 28, p. 311.
    R. T. Bui~s, . l~\TM. M. FULKERSON, For Appellants,
    CITED
    Civil Code, secs. 15, 16, 92, 94. 4 Met. 71.
    
    1 Met. 380, Commonwealth v. Thornton.
    4 Met. 225, Commonwealth v. Rowland.
    3 Met. 2, Commonwealth v. Runnion.
    14 B. Mon. 291, Commonwealth v. Bronson.
    Thos. E. Moss, Attorney General, .... For Appellee,
    CITED
    General Statutes, chap. 7, secs. 3, 5, 15.
   JUDGE PRYOR

delivered the opinion oe the court.

The appellants having been made liable by a judgment of the Lawrence County Court on a bond executed by them as the sureties of one Charles Handley for his appearance to answer a charge of bastardy, etc., have prosecuted an appeal to this court.

The law authorizing appeals in certain cases from the judgment of a county court directly to the Court of Appeals was repealed by the adoption of the General Statutes.

Section 2 of article 22 of chapter 28, General Statutes, provides that “no appeal shall be taken to the Court of Appeals from a judgment for the recovery of money or personal property if the value in controversy be less than $50, exclusive of cost; nor to reverse a judgment granting a divorce or punishing contempt, nor from an order or judgment of a county court, quarterly, city, or police court, nor from a court held by a justice of the peace, or one having jurisdiction not greater than that of a justice of the peace, nor from a bond having the force of a judgment.”

The appeal is therefore dismissed.  