
    Samuels v. Langfeld Brothers & Company et al.
    
    Under the facts in evidence, there was no abuse of discretion in granting an injunction and appointing a receiver.
    June 11, 1894.
    Argued at the last term.
    Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Lumpkin, Pulton county. January 27, 1894.
    John C. Reed, Mord Foote, Jr., and Goodwin & Westmoreland, for plaintiff in error. N. J. & T. A. Hammond, Candler & Thomson and Marshall J. Clarice, contra.
    
   Judgment affirmed.  