
    PRAMCO II, LLC, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David M. KISSI, Defendant—Appellant, and Edith Truvillion Kissi, Defendant, Carlos M. Recio, Party-in-Interest, Bank of America, NA; Montgomery County Active Employees; Animendale Living Trust, Garnishees. Pramco II, LLC, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David M. Kissi, Defendant—Appellant, and Edith Truvillion Kissi, Defendant, Richard M. Kremen, Party-in-Interest, Montgomery County Active Employees; Ammendale Living Trust; Key Bank & Trust, Garnishees. Pramco II, LLC; Emil Hirsch; O’Connor & Hannan, LLP, Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. David M. Kissi, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust, Defendant—Appellant, and Edith Truvillion Kissi, Individually and in her capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust; Ammendale Living Trust, Defendants, Christopher Bowmar Mead; Richard M. Kremen; Jose Andrade; DLA Piper U.S. LLP; Robert Eric Greenberg, Parties-in-Interest, David Muchow, Respondent, Ammendale Living Trust, Garnishee, v. Michael Pearson; Bennett and Bair, LLP, Movants. Pramco II, LLC, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David M. Kissi, Defendant—Appellant, and Edith Truvillion Kissi, Defendant, Montgomery County Active Employees; Ammendale Living Trust, Garnishees. In re: DK & R Company, Debtor—Party Below. David M. Kissi, Party-in-Interest—Appellant, and Edith Truvillion Kissi, Party-in-Interest, v. Richard M. Kremen, Trustee—Appellee. In re: DK & R Company, Debtor. David M. Kissi, Party-in-Interest—Appellant, and Edith Truvillion Kissi, Party-in-Interest, v. Richard M. Kremen, Trustee—Appellee.
    Nos. 08-1826, 08-1827, 08-1829, 08-1835, 08-1837, 08-1872.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 23, 2009.
    Decided: April 29, 2009.
    David M. Kissi, Appellant pro se. Emil Hirsch, James Patrick Ryan, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Maria Ellena Chavez Ruark, DLA Piper U.S. LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, David M. Kissi appeals from the district court’s orders denying as frivolous his multiple motions for recusal, return of fees, and to dissolve a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny all of Kissi’s pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pramco II, LLC v. Kissi Nos. 8:02-cv-00042-PJM 8:02-cv-00043-PJM; 8:03-cv-02241-PJM; 8:02-cv-00044-PJM (D. Md. June 20, 2008); Kissi v. Kremen, No. 8:08-cv-00748-PJM (D. Md. June 3, 2008; June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  