
    No. 46751.
    Protests 886413-G, etc., of H. W. Robinson & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Bullocks v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question consisting of articles (not fabrics) in part of silk or -artificial silk, or both, was held not subject to countervailing duty as claimed.  