
    CHOATE et al. v. SPENCER et al.
    No. 18648.
    Opinion Filed March 13, 1928.
    Rehearing Denied April 24, 1928.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Review of Evidence— Record.
    Assignments of error requiring an examination or consideration of evidence will not he reviewed by this court unless all the evidence relating- thereto is preserved and brought up in the case-made attached to the petition in error.
    Note. — See 4 O. J. p. 336, §1966.
    Error from District Court, Carter County ; Asa Walden, Judge.
    Action between C. A. Choate et al. and W. A. Spencer and wife. From the judgment, the former áppeal.
    Dismissed.
    ■Sigler & Jackson, for plaintiffs in error.
    G. Y. Pardue, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Carter county in favor of the defendants in error and against the plaintiff in error.

The appeal was lodged in this court by petition in error with ease-made attached. The assignments of error are such as can only be reviewed by an examination or consideration of the evidence introduced in the trial of this cause in the court below. The case-made does not contain any of the evidence introduced at the trial of "the cause. Assignments of error requiring an examination and the consideration of the evidence will not be reviewed by this court, unless all the evidence relating thereto is preserved and brought up by case-made or otherwise. Haggerty v. Terwilliger, 67 Okla. 194, 169 Pac. 872. The assignments of error in the petition in error in this case require a review of evidence, and the evidence not being incorporated in the case-made, there is nothing before this court for review.

The appeal is dismissed.  