
    WILLIAM C. SINCLAIR v. INVESTORS SYNDICATE.
    
    June 20, 1913.
    Nos. 18,102—(189).
    Settlement of “case.”
    The court did not abuse its discretion in settling the “case” after the expiration of the stay. [Reporter.]
    
      From an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Steele, J., denying deiendant’s motion to suppress the settled case and strike it from the records, defendant appealed.
    Affirmed.
    
      Tappan & Silverthorn and E. M. Earnwm, for appellant.
    
      John M. Bees, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 142 N. W. 1135.
    
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal hy the defendant from an order of the district court of Hennepin county denying its motion to suppress and strike from the records the settled case.

We have examined the record and we do not find that the court abused its discretion in settling the ease after the expiration of the stay.

Order affirmed.  