
    Archibald C. Haynes, Resp’t, v. J. Blakeley Creighton, App’lt.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
    
    
      Filed October 24, 1890.)
    
    Appeal from an order vacating an order for the examination of the plaintiff.
    
      William Man, for app’lt; Boot & Clarke, for resp’t.
   Daniels, J.

This action is upon a note for $2,000 made by the defendant and endorsed by him. It is shown by the defendant’s affidavit, on which the order for the examination of the plaintiff has been made, to be one of the notes delivered by the defendant to A. D. Jones, to be delivered by-him to Charles T. Russell, and diverted and misappropriated by Jones. And the order for the plaintiff’s examination is in the same form as that made in the other action by him against the defendant. The necessity for this examination, to obtain information to frame the answer, has been shown the same as it was in the other action by the plaintiff against the defendant And for the reasons stated in that action, the order from which this appeal has been brought should be reversed, and the motion denied, without costs, but with the disbursements on the appeal to the defendant.

Yan Brunt, P. J., and Brady, J., concur.  