
    Matter of the Estate of Edith O. Gill, Deceased.
    (Surrogate’s Court, New York County,
    December, 1915.)
    Wills — construction of — life tenants — trustee in bankruptcy — executors and administrators.
    The construction of a will as determined by the Court of Appeals must be’ followed in the decree made upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of the administrator with the will annexed.
    While a life tenant is still living, the trustee in bankruptcy of one entitled only to. an interest in the estate in remainder is not entitled to a construction of the will, or to an adjudication in reference to the remainder, and the decree to be entered upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of the administrator with the will annexed should contain no adjudication in relation to the interest of the bankrupt.
    Proceeding upon the accounting of an administrator with the will annexed.
    
      Anderson & Anderson, for executor.
    Henry Necarsulmer (Max J. Kohler, of counsel), for trustee.
    Walmsley & Kohlman, for Edward E. Elder.
    Andrew S. Hamersley, special guardian.
   Fowler, S.

The administrator with the will annexed of the estate of the testatrix having died, his executor has filed an account of his proceedings as such administrator. The special guardian appointed by this court to represent certain infants mentioned in the petition as having an interest in the estate filed his report, and exceptions thereto have been filed by the trustee in bankruptcy of a person having a vested interest as remainderman. There is no provision in the sections of the Code of Civil -Procedure relating to Surrogates’ Courts, nor in the rules of this court, which authorizes the filing of -exceptions to a special guardian’s report. Such a report is made for the purpose of acquainting the court with the nature of the infant’s interest, the manner in which such interest has been conserved by the accounting party, and the extent to which it is protected by the proposed decree. It is not a finding upon any question of law or fact which is binding on any party to the accounting. Therefore, it is not the proper practice to file exceptions to the findings or recommendations contained in such a report. However, as the question of law presented by the exceptions to the special guardian’s report is the same as that presented by the decree submitted by the trustee in bankruptcy, the court may properly consider it at the time the proposed decree is noticed for settlement. The decree submitted by the trustee in bankruptcy contains a clause adjudging that a certain devise and bequest under the will of the testatrix passed a vested remainder to the bankrupt, that such remainder was not subject to be divested by his death before the life tenant, and that the interest of the bankrupt became the exclusive property of the trustee in bankruptcy upon his appointment as such trustee. This would be, in effect, a construction of the will of the testatrix. But the Court of Appeals has already construed her will (Riker v. Gwynne, 201 N. Y. 143), and that construction will be followed in any decree entered in this court. Moreover, the trustee in bankruptcy is entitled only to an interest in the remainder, and as the life tenant is still living such remainder is not distributable at this time, and is not affected by the present accounting. Therefore the trustee in bankruptcy is not entitled to a construction of the will at the present time or to an adjudication in reference to the remainder. The decree to be signed upon this accounting, therefore, will not contain any adjudication in relation to the interests of the bankrupt. Costs taxed. The decree presented by the petitioner should be completed by inserting the proper amounts.

Decreed accordingly.  