
    WILLIAM A. JENNINGS, Plaintiff in Error, v. PETER BARTELS, Defendant in Error.
    Only final judgments, orders and decisions are reviewable in this Court.
    Error, to Third Judicial District, holding terms at Seattle.
    To the judgment ordei'ed in the District Court, the following order was appended : “ And it appearing to the Court that the cause of action herein is one in which the defendant may be arrested, under Section 116 of the Code of Washington Territory, it is now ordered by the Court- that execution issue as well against the person as the property of defendant.”
    Thereafter execution issued on said judgment against the person of the plaintiff in error, and he ivas arrested. After said arrest, plaintiff in error moved the Court to vacate and set aside the portion of the judgment above recited; from which action of the Court this appeal was taken. On the authority of the case of Wells, Fargo Co. v. Northern Pacific B. B. Go., the ap>peal was dismissed, because the order complained of was not appealable.
    - Mc-Naught, Ferry, McNaught $ Mitchell, for Plaihtiff in error.
    
      Burke $ Basin and J. B. Lewis, for Defendant in error.
     