
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HAO TRAN, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-10308 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed February 21, 2017
    
      James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant .U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Hao Tran, Pro Se
    
      Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Hao Tran has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tran has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47,5.4.
     