
    8535.
    Yates v. Bank of Donalsonville.
    Decided July 5, 1917.
    Complaint; from city court of Bainbridge—W. Y. Custer, judge pro hac vice. January 10, 1917.
    
      A. E. Thornton, for plaintiff in error.
   Broyles, P. J.

This was a suit on a promissory note, and under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for, with interest and attorney’s fees.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  