
    UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Felipe ESCOBAR, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 00-1700.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Oct. 30, 2001.
    Felipe Escobar, Federal Correctional Institute, Fort Dix, NJ, pro se.
    Christopher J. Clark and Gary Stein, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Mary Jo White, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for appellee.
    Present PIERRE N. LEVAL and FRED I. PARKER, Circuit Judges, and JOHN F. KEENAN, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable John F. Keenan, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Defendant Felipe Escobar appeals from the denial of a motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Escobar seeks to reduce his sentence pursuant to Amendment 518 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, adopted after his sentence was imposed. He contends on appeal that the district court erred in concluding that post-sentence modification is not permitted because Amendment 518 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 161.10(c).

We find no error in the district court’s decision. Section 1B1.10(c) governs reductions of sentence due to subsequent amendments and specifies which amendments a defendant may invoke under § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Perez, 129 F.3d 255, 259 (2d Cir.1997). Amendment 518 is not included in § 1B1.10(c). Section 3582 is therefore inapplicable.

We have considered all of the defendant’s contentions and find no merit in any of them. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.  