
    GOLDALE LIQUOR COMPANY v. O. BAILYS.
    
    November 28, 1919.
    No. 21,473.
    Action on promissory note i— finding supported by evidence.
    Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $600 on a promissory note. The case was tried before Charles 3U 'Smith, J., who made findings and ordered judgment for the amount demanded. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed. Affirmed.
    
      George R. Smith, H. Stanley Sanson and Leo J. Gleason, for appellant.
    
      Jonas Weil, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 174 N. W. 821.
    
   Per Cubiam.

The only question involved on this appeal is whether the findings of the trial court are sustained by the evidence. ■ The action is upon a promissory note. Defendant interposed in defence an agreement between the parties by which defendant agreed to transfer to plaintiffs his saloon business with stock and fixtures in full discharge of the note; that plaintiffs agreed to accept the same. It appears that the agreement was made, but the trial court found as a fact that it was never parried out or performed by the partie's, and by mutual consent was subsequently rescinded. Our examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence to support the findings.

The record presents no reversible error and the order appealed from is affirmed.  