
    Bailey et al. v. Bailey.
    It is not error to deny an injunction where the only evidence in support of the allegations of the petition is an affidavit by the petitioners that “the facts contained in the written bill of complaint are true so far as they depend on our own. knowledge and belief, and so far as they depend on the knowledge and information of others we believe them to be true.”
    October 1, 1892.
    Injunction. "Verification of petition. Before Judge Bower. Dougherty county. At chambers,
    May 5, 1892.
    Petition of Boisey and Cynthia Bailey for injunction against the enforcement of a judgment for alimony in favor of Alice Bailey against Boisey Bailey, alleging that said judgment was obtained solely upon the testitimony of Alice Bailey ; that said testimony “was from beginning to end entirely false, a perjury of the deepest dye”; and that execution had issued from the judgment and had been levied upon property of Cynthia Bailey, to which she had been compelled to interpose her claim, which was then pending. Attached to the petition was the affidavit mentioned in the head-note. Upon presentation of the petition to the judge he refused the injunction, and the petitioners excepted.
   Judgment affirmed.

Ii. Morgan, for plaintiffs.

D. Ii. Pope, for defendant.  