
    Jimmy LOCKLEAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 05-6255.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 30, 2005.
    Decided: Oct. 21, 2005.
    Jimmy Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Locklear appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-936 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  