
    The State ex rel. Martin, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Martin v. Indus. Comm. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 361.]
    (No. 98-1069
    Submitted November 10, 1998
    Decided January 20, 1999.)
    
      Larrimer & Larrimer and David H. Swanson, for appellant.
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and C. Bradley Howenstein, for appellee Industrial Commission.
    
      Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P., Brett L. Miller, Richard A. Hernandez and Michael L. Williams, for appellee Lancaster Fairfield Community Hospital.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.  