
    No. 4125
    Second Circuit
    CLARENCE ANTOINE v. INTERURBAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
    (March 16, 1932. Opinion and Decree.)
    Guión & Upton, of New Orleans, and Peterman, Dear & Peterman, of Alexandria, attorneys for plaintiff, appellant.
    Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, attorneys for defendant, appellee.
   McGREGOR, J.

This case grows out of the same state of facts as those of Peter and Adeline Antoine against this same defendant. The three cases were consolidated for trial and were all' submitted on the same evidence. The lower court rejected the plaintiff’s demand and rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated, 19 La. App. 203, 140 So. 151, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with all the costs to be paid by the plaintiff, appellant.  