
    CITY OF SHAWNEE v. COTTERAL.
    No. 2533.
    Opinion Filed February 18, 1913.
    (130 Pac. 548.)
    MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — Insufficient Revenue — Discharge of Policeman. Where the revenues of a city are not sufficient, to pay a policeman, the council has the right to discontinue the office and relieve the incumbent from duty without preferring charges against him.
    (Syllabus by Brewer, C.)
    
      Error from Pottawatomie Gounty Gourtj E. D. Beasor, Judge.
    
    Action by D. Cotteral against the City of Shawnee. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
    Eeversed and rendered for defendant.
    
      E. E. Hood and W. M. Engart, for plaintiff in error.
    
      P. U. Beily, for defendant in error.
   Opinion by

BBEWEB, C.

This action was brought by D. Cotteral against the city of Shawnee to recover an amount alleged to be due him for salary for the month of January, 1908, as a policeman of said city. The case was tried' upon an agreed statement of facts, and resulted in a judgment against the city for the amount claimed. The agreed statement of facts in this case is, except as to the name of the party, the position held, and the amount claimed, identical with that in case City of Shawnee v. Hewett, post, 130 Pac. 546 In that case the judgment of the lower court was reversed, and the cause rendered in favor of the plaintiff in error, the city of Shawnee; the syllabus being as follows:

“Where the revenues of a city are not sufficient to pay an assistant chief of police, the council has the right to discontinue the office, and to discharge the incumbent of that office withoiit charges being preferred against him.”

For the reasoning of the court and the authorities relied upon, see the decision referred to. That case controls the case at bar.

The case should be reversed and rendered in favor of the city of Shawnee.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  