
    Alexander Harris v. John A. Peel.
    W'heve tlie note .sued on beai*s eight per cent, interest, no special damages will be allowed as for a frivolous appeal: and this court will simply affirm the judgment of the court below.
    . from the Sixth District Court of New Orleans', Howell, J.
    
      Durará c® Honor for plaintiff.
   Jones, J.

The plaintiff, as the holder of a mortgage note, sued out a writ of seizure and sale as to the mortgaged property.

His proceedings are regular; and, upon the examination of the record, we find no error prejudicial to the appellant.

This appeal was taken for delay; but, as the note, the basis of the seizure, bears eight per cent, interest, we simply affirm the judgment, with costs.

Howele, J., recused.  