
    Paul Daddona et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Stamford
    
      Milton Turhel, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
    
      Theodore Godlin, for the appellee (defendant).
    Argued November 1
    decided November 1, 1966
   It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.  