
    Wirtz et al. v. Bird.
    [No. 10,112.
    Filed December 17, 1919.]
    
      Appeal. — Evidence Conflicting. — Review.—Where all questions involved in an appeal require a review of conflicting evidence, the judgment of the trial court is conclusive.
    From Vanderburgh Superior Court; F. M. Hostetter, Judge.
    Action between Christian Wirtz and another and David P. Bird. From the judgment rendered, the former appeal.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      
      F. S. La Monte and William D. Hardy, for appellants.
    
      Walker & Walker, for appellee.
   Remy, P. J.

— All questions involved in this appeal require for their determination a review of conflicting evidence. Under such circumstances the judgment of the trial court is conclusive, and on the authority of Nicholson v. Smith (1916), 60 Ind. App. 385, 110 N. E. 1007, judgment is affirmed.  