
    Before the First Division,
    August 24, 1939
    No. 41982.
    Protests 894348-G, etc., of May Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. (Los Angeles).
   Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

While the combination of articles, namely, racquets, shuttlecocks, and net, is described in the stipulation as “complete articles (badminton sets),” the court was not satisfied that sufficient evidence had been presented to warrant a finding that the combination constitutes an entirety for tariff purposes. Lang v. United States (15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 341, T. D. 42495) cited. The protests were therefore overruled. Judge Sullivan agreed in the conclusion; Brown, J., dissented.  