
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Courtney Markee GILMORE, a/k/a Dust, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7279.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 15, 2015.
    Decided: Oct. 20, 2015.
    Courtney Markee Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Courtney Markee Gilmore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gilmore, No. 3:09-cr-00501-JFA-6 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,  