
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Napoleon SANTOS, a.k.a. Hector Napoleon-Santos, a.k.a. Hector Napoleon Santos, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-10488.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 26, 2015.
    
    Filed Oct. 28, 2015.
    Michael Richard Perez-Lizano, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USTÜ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    
      Hector Napoleon Santos, Tucson, AZ, pro se.
    Kathleen Genevieve Williamson, Esquire, FCI-Correctional Institution, Big Spring, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Hector Napoleon Santos appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 43-month sentence for attempted illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Santos’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Santos the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental' brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Santos has waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver, we dismiss Santos’s appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     