
    HENRY VON GLAHN v. JOHN DAWSON.
    (For the Syllabus, see the case of Von Glahn v. Harris, ante page 330.)
    The points raised in this, and the facts relating thereto, are similar to those in the preceding case of Von Glahn v. Latimer.
    
    In the Court below, the defendant had judgment, and the plaintiff appealed.
    
      French and W. S. <& D. J. Devane, for appellant.
    
      Strange and Battle dk Son, contra.
   Pearson, C. J.

Same opinion as in Yon Glahn v. Latimer.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.  