
    Clara Galus, Individually and as Executrix of Philip Galus, Deceased, Appellant, v William Milner, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
    Decided October 29, 1981
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Daniel H. Mahoney for appellant.
    
      
      James M. Conboy for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say that the order reinstating the jury’s verdict was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (Holland v Blake, 31 NY2d 734).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.  