
    20891.
    Farley v. The State.
    Decided November 11, 1930.
    
      W. T. Davidson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J oseph B. Duke, solicitor-general, Miles 'W. Lewis, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires another trial bf the case; the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, which is approved by the judge who presided, and no error Was committed when the motion for a new trial was overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur.  