
    Ida E. Hollander, Appellant, v. Harry Hollander, Respondent.
   Order affirmed. The defenses are sufficiently broad to permit the defendant to show that the plaintiff has refused to resume marital relations with the defendant since the repudiation of the separation agreement. (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74.) Present —• Dowling, P. J., Finch, MeAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.  