
    22585, 22586.
    STEPHENS et al. v. BROWN et al.; and vice versa.
    Submitted September 14, 1964
    Decided September 28, 1964
    Rehearing denied October 13, 1964.
    
      Al D. Tull, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Jere F. White, contra.
   Grice, Justice.

The main bill of exceptions assigns error on the grant of a motion for new trial on two grounds complaining of erroneous charges to the jury. Plaintiffs in error contend that such charges, even if erroneous, were harmless in that a verdict in their favor was demanded by the evidence. However, no certification of approval by the trial judge is shown on the purported brief of evidence and there is no brief of the evidence incorporated in the certified bill of exceptions or attached thereto as an exhibit and identified by the trial judge. While the bill of exceptions recites that a brief of the evidence had been approved, there is no identification of the purported brief of evidence sent up with the record as being the one approved. Since the errors complained of require consideration .of the evidence, we cannot, under these circumstances, determine whether error was committed, and therefore, the judgment granting the motion for new trial must be affirmed. Cobb v. DeLong, 216 Ga. 794 (120 SE2d 177).

Due to the foregoing disposition of the main bill of exceptions, the cross bill complaining of the denial of one of the other grounds of the motion for new trial must be dismissed.

Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross bill dismissed.

All the Justices concur.  