
    Dislanda Gill, as Administratrix of the Estate of Anthony Gill, Deceased, Respondent, v. United American Lines, Appellant.
    
      Appeal — motion to dismiss — constitutional question involved.
    
    Reported below, 206 App. Div. 778.
    (Argued October 1, 1923;
    decided October 9, 1923.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 3, 1923, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
    The motion was made upon the ground that permission to appeal had not been obtained. Appellant contended that a constitutional question was involved.
    
      William S. Butler for motion.
    
      E. C. Sherwood opposed.
   Motion denied, without costs and without prejudice to right to renew motion on argument of appeal.  