
    George Melvin vs. Nathan Fisher.
    He who causes another to be arrested by a wrong name, is a trespasser, eren if the process by virtue of which the arrest is made was intended to be against the person actually arrested.
    This was an action of trespass, for an assault, battery and false imprisonment.
    The cause was tried upon the general issue, at February term, 1836.
    It appeared that on the 20th June, 1835, the defendant sued out a writ against George Melvil, by virtue of which he caused the plaintiff to he arrested and committed to prison, where he remained for more than sixty days. The writ by virtue of which the arrest was made, was returnable before a justice of the peace, but was never returned. It was not disputed that the writ was intended to be sued out against the plaintiff.
    The court directed the jury that if the plaintiff had always been called and known by the name of Melvin, and not by the name of Melvil, the arrest was illegal, and the plaintiff entitled to recover.
    The jury having returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, with $s 150 damages, the defendant moved for a new trial upon the above case.
    
      C. G. Atherton, for the plaintiff.
    
      Hazeltine, for the defendant.
   Richardson, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Where a party has been usually and commonly called and known by several names, he may be lawfully arrested by any name by which he has been usually known.

But it. is well settled, that he who causes another to be arrested by a wrong name is a trespasser, even if the process was intended to be against the person actually arrested. 2 Strange 1218, Crawford vs. Snatchwell; 6 D. & E. 234, Cole vs. Hindson; 8 East 328, Shadgett vs. Clipson; I B. & A. 647, Morgans vs. Bridges; 2 Taunton 399 & 401, Wilkes vs. Lerck, & Ahitbol vs. Beneditte; 1 Marshall 75, The King vs. the Sheriff.

Judgment on tlie verdict.  