
    Blackwell vs. The State of Georgia.
    Where exception was taken to the refusal of a motion for new trial, and it appeared that the brief of evidence, though agreed upon by counsel as correct, was never approved and ordered filed by the presiding judge, and that neither the truth of the grounds of the motion nor the correctness of the charge set out therein were certified to, but that the presiding judge, in the rule nisi, declared that he would approve “so' much thereof as the court thinks proper,” but did not do so, and the motion was passed upon by another judge, its refusal will not cause a reversal.
    (a.) The evidence not only sustained, but required, the verdict.
    Judgment affirmed.
    January 21, 1885.
   Hall, Justice.  