
    The Commonwealth v. Moses Mann.
    Justices of Peace—Hisbehavior in Office—Intoxication —Amotion.—Sitting on the bench while in a state of intoxication from drinking spirituous liauors, and rendered thereby incompetent to discharge the duties of the office with propriety, decorum and discretion, is misbehavior by a justice of the peace, for which a superior court may render judgment of amotion from office against him.
   The defendant, who was a magistrate of the county of Bath, was presented by the grand j ury, and then prosecuted by information in the superior court of law, for misbehaviour in office. The charge against him was, that at a court of quarter sessions 309 duly held for the county *of Bath, &c., the defendant who then was, and still is, a justice of the peace in and for the said county, duly commissioned and sworn as such, did take his seat on the bench of the said court, and act in the capacity of a justice of the peace aforesaid, and member of said court, while and when he was in a state of intoxication, and inebriation, from the drinking of spirituous liquors, insomuch that he at the time, &c., and during all the time of his sitting and acting, as aforesaid, was incompetent to discharge the duties of his office with propriety, with decorum, and discretion ; and disqualified from the free exercise of his understanding in the matters and things, at the time and place, &c., legally and judicially brought before him.

He was found guilty by the jury, and the superior court adjourned to the general court, the question arising from the verdict, whether judgment of amotion from his office of the justice of the peace, should be rendered against him.

November 11th, 1812, present judges White, Carrington, Brockenbrough, Semple, and Allen, it was declared’to be the unanimous opinion of the court, “that judgment of amotion from the office of justice of the peace ought to be rendered against the said Moses Mann.”  