
    22737.
    Millican v. The State.
    Decided December 24, 1932.
    
      M. B. Súbanles, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, Horace D. Shattucle, contra.
   Bboyles, O. J.

The evidence in this case authorized the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis except that of the defendant’s guilt of the offense charged (possessing whisky); and the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds only, was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Eooper and MacIntyre, JJ., concur.  