
    METZ, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN BEACH BATHING CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    January 12, 1912.)
    Action by Emma C. Metz against the Manhattan Beach Bathing Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant presents sufficient excuse for delay in prosecuting the appeal. No affidavit is presented, as required by rule adopted by this court October 4, 1910, showing merits. The appellant may have until January 15, 1912, to submit such affidavit-and serve copy on his adversary, who" then may serve replying affidavits within two days.  