
    Coale, et al. vs. Mildred's Adm'r.
    Appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery, annulling certain deeds and declaring them fraudulent as to creditors. The hill of the complainant, (now appellee,) alleged, among other things not material to be'stated, a debt due to him on bond, &c. from the ancestor of the defendants, (now appellants,) And it was proved by the tealimony in the cause, that the bond was assigned by W. Cooke, the attorney of the complainant, to T. fl. Backer». and by him assigned to P. Macgill; neither Backer nor Macgill were made parties. The chancellor having decreed in favour of the complainant, the defendants appeal-to this court.
    On a bill filed S» elmneery in the- name of the obligee in a bond» ■which had been assigned to a third person, who was not mude a party in the cause — -Hetfi, that the assignee of the bond should have teen made a par* i - > ’ • ;
    The cause was argued before Buchanan, Nicholson* ánd Earle, J.
    
      Martin and Magruder, for the Appellants*
    contended, that the proper parties were not before the court. That the complainant had no interest, having assigned away the bond to Backer, who assigned to Macgill. That Macgill should have been a party complainant, They referred to Hind's Chan. Pr. 2.
    
    
      Pinkney, for the Appellee,
    admitted that proper parties had not been made,
   decree reversed.  