
    James B. Cahill, Appellant, v. Max Lichtenstadter, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew. York, eighth district, borough of Manhattan.
    
      Holt & Duross, for appellant.
    J. Martin, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The evidence sufficiently establishes a prima facie case. The truck had painted upon it the words, M. Lichtenstadter, 54th Street and 1st Avenue.” It was loaded with what appeared to be flour barrels. Defendant was engaged in the flour business at 986 First avenue, near Fifty-fourth street. The facts established were sufficient to- put defendant upon his proof. Doherty v. Lord, 8 Misc. Rep. 227; Seaman v. Koehler, 122 N. Y. 646.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.  