
    No. 471.
    Calaf et al. v. Calaf.
    Appeal from the District Court of Arecibo. Appellant’s motion that the original of certain documents presented in the lower court he joined to the transcript of the record, and respondent’s motion that a facsimile or photographic copy of certain documents accompanying the appellant’s brief be stricken from the record.
    Decided January 25, 1910.
    
      Messrs. Antonio Alvarez Nava and C. M. Boerman for petitioner. Messrs. Eduardo Acuña, Carlos López de Tord and Nemesio B. Canales for respondent.
   First motion overruled because the Supreme Court has no authority to modify or alter the statement of facts, by considering exhibits which did not form part thereof. Second motion sustained said photographic copy being ordered stricken out.  