
    Charles Michael STOKES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Andrew MOORMAN, sued in his individual and official capacities, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 10-7411.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.
    Decided: Jan. 4, 2011.
    Charles Michael Stokes, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles M. Stokes appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stokes v. Moorman, No. 9:10-cv-01711-CMC, 2010 WL 3834470 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  