
    DeVaughn vs. Armstrong, administrator.
    1. The verdict is not contrary to law or evidence.
    2. The grounds of a motion for new trial must be verified by the presiding judge. Where this is not done, only the formal grounds that the verdict is contrary to law and evidence, will be considered by this court. 46 Ga., 161.
    October 10, 1882.
   Crawford, Justice.  