
    No. 9801.
    Davies v. Craig, et al.
    Decided December 5, 1921.
    On motion to re-tax costs. Items re-taxed.
    1. Costs — In Appellate Court. This case controlled by the decision in Antero Co. v. Lowe, 70 Colo. 467.
    2. Interest — On Judgments. Upon execution or satisfaction of judgment, interest should be collected at the rate of eight per cent per annum.
    
      3. Statutes — Repealed. Section 3624, R. S. 1908, repealed by section 3162, R. S. 1908.
    Messrs. Howard & McCrillis, for plaintiff in error.
    Mr. H. A. Hicks, Mr. E. W. Hurlbut, Mr. A. T. Monson, for defendants in error.
    
      En banc.
    
   Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is controlled by Antero, etc., Co. v. Lowe, 70 Colo. 467, 203 Pac. 265, decided at this term.

Upon the first writ of error the costs should be taxed thus:

For transcript of record, 160 folios a 200........ $ 32.

For Clerk’s certificate thereto.................. .75

For printing abstract of record, 146 pp.......... 146.

For clerical costs according to rule.............. 20.

$198.75

Upon the second writ of error thus:

For transcript of record, 1892 fols a 200........ 378.40

Clerk’s certificate thereto..................... .75

Printing abstract of record 344 pp a $1.......... 344.

Clerical costs as prescribed by rule.............. 20.

$743.15

Upon execution or satisfaction interest should be collected at eight per cent per annum from the date of each judgment. Bates v. Wilson, 18 Colo. 287, 32 Pac. 615.

We are of the opinion that R. S. 1908 § 3624, S. L. 1861, p. 265 § 4, as to the rate of interest, is repealed by R. S. 1908, § 3162, S. L. 1889, p. 206 § 2. The commission seems to have omitted it from the Compiled Laws, probably because they were of the same opinion.  