
    No. 49144.
    Protests 68745-K, etc., of Tuck Cheong & Co. (Baltimore).
   Opinion by

Colb, J.

The' Ve-tsin in question was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in Quong Yuen Shing Co. v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained to this extent.  