
    2872.
    Gilpin v. Smith.
    Decided August 4, 1911.
    Trover; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Harrell. July 9, 1910.
    
      E. 8. Longley, for plaintiff in error.
    
      R. G Hartsfield, contra.
   Russell, J.

1. The evidence on.the main point involved (that is, as to whether the defendant bought the property with’ actual notice) was in such conflict as to make the finding of the jury, approved by the trial judge, conclusive upon this court.

2. Although a paper is signed by mark, and is neither attested nor re-. corded, it is admissible in evidence when its execution is directly proved by one who saw it signed. Judgment affirmed.  