
    In re Byrne W. DYER, III.
    No. 2012-B-1412.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    June 27, 2012.
   ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

| ,The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with his client, and failed to properly withdraw from the representation of the client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Byrne W. Dyer, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5135, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid. 
      
       Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
     