
    Richard Schnibbe, Appellant, v. Louis Stutz and Ernest Stutz, Respondents.
   Plaintiff’s testimony that, upon his objection to the provisions furnished and refusal to accept them, the defendants agreed that if plaintiff would accept them they would “stand behind them,” tended to establish indemnification for subsequent acceptance. Without further expression upon the merits, we reverse the judgment dismissing the complaint, and order a new trial, costs to abide the event. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Burr and Rich, JJ., concurred.  