
    Hill v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, appellant.
    
      Evidence—of market price.
    
    A witness testified to the price Of wool on a certain day, but said he only derived his information from others who dealt in wool; did not know of or attend a sale of wool that day, and did not name any wool broker with whom he had conversed. Held insufficient to establish the price.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of referee. The action was brought in Chenango county by Silas R. Hill to recover for a breach of contract to transport certain wool.
    
      Sedgwicks, Kennedy & Tracy, for appellant.
    
      L. B. Kern, for respondent.
   Miller, P. J.

The opinion is devoted to a consideration of the facts. . The headnote states fully the only point of any importance therein.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted.  