
    Union Chelsea National Bank, Respondent, v Rumican 190 Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
    Submitted May 24, 1999;
    decided July 6, 1999
   Motion, insofar as N. Marius Bucurescu seeks leave to appeal purportedly on behalf of Doina M. Bucurescu and Rumican 190 Corporation, dismissed upon the ground that N. Marius Bucurescu is not the authorized legal representative of said appellants and, as to Rumican 190 Corporation, cannot be its authorized legal representative (see, CPLR 321 [a]); motion for leave to appeal by N. Marius Bucurescu on his own behalf denied.  