
    In the Matter of the Claim of Louis Florick, Respondent, against Broad Window Cleaning Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
    (Argued June 4, 1926;
    decided July 9, 1926.)
    
      Workmen’s compensation — master and servant ■— injury from fall — award for facial disfigurement.
    
    
      Florick v. Broad Window Cleaning Co., 215 App. Div. 734, affirmed.
    Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 16, 1925, unanimously affirming an award of the State Industrial Board made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant, a window cleaner, was injured by a fall from a ladder in the course of his employment, resulting in a scar on his forehead. An award was made for facial disfigurement though his earning capacity was unimpaired.
    Order affirmed, with costs;
    
      Paul Koch and Charles 0. Truex for appellants.
    
      Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.
   no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.  