
    Pearson against Bailey.
    NEWYORK,
    May, 1813.
    la an sciionot fov4°89udollars, staiments of eÜlh., brought tó recover the first instalment, the viral' jurisment for the debt, an j 49 dollars and 80 eeuts damages g it was held that he was entitled to fall costs*
    THIS was an action of debt on a bond for the sum of 4,800 dollars, conditioned to pay 1,800 dollars, by yearly instalments, of 200 dollars each.' The first instalment, being 200 dollars, became due on the first of Man, 1812, to recover which the present suit was brought, and the plaintiff recovered judgment of the debt, and 49 dollars and 80 cents damages: the question was, whether he was entitled to full costs.
   Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, in this case, is entitled to full costs,  