
    INTERNATIONAL HOD CARRIERS’, BUILDING AND COMMON LABORERS’ UNION LOCAL 478-AFL-CIO, and Bernard Rubin, Business Agent of Said Union, et al., Appellants, v. HEFTLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a New Jersey Corporation, admitted to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 58-204.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    June 5, 1958.
    Kaplan & Ser, Miami, and Kastenbaum, Mamber & Gopman, Miami Beach, for appellants.
    Williams & Salomon, Miami, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON, J., concur.

PEARSON, Judge

(concurring specially)-

Inasmuch as this is an interlocutory appeal from a temporary injunction and a clear abuse of discretion has not been shown, I have concurred in the decision. However it should be noted that this decision is not a holding that as a permanent injunction it would be legally sufficient.

The terms of the injunction are so broad that they might be interpreted as follows: (1) an order to “members” of the union to work, or (2) a denial of the right to strike for any purpose. Under either of these interpretations such injunctions could not be grounded upon the alleged illegal boycott.  