
    Emelina MEJER-KONDLA, Appellant, v. DOUGLAS CENTRE, INC. and Eagleton Kathe Property Co., Appellees.
    No. 97-364.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 12, 1997.
    Garcia, Martinez & Dominguez, and Carlos Garcia, and Humberto R. Dominquez, and Eve A. Boutsis, Miami, for appellant.
    Richard A. Sherman, and Rosemary B. Wilder, Fort Lauderdale; Pedisich & Wilen-sky, and Michael K. Wilensky, Fort Lauder-dale; Robert A. Glassman, and David J. Ven-tura, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appel-lees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.  