
    Ex Parte Bailey Cross.
    No. 10317.
    Delivered June 9, 1926.
    Habeas Corpus — Judgment — Cannot Be Attacked Collaterally.
    Relator presents to this court an original application for a writ of habeas corpus, attacking the validity of a judgment in the District Court of Madison County. This is an attempt to collaterally attack the judgment which, we think, is not void but subject to correction by direct proceedings in the trial court, and the writ is denied.
    An original application for a writ of habeas corpus, attacking a judgment rendered in the District Court of Madison County. Writ denied.
    Brief filed by petitioner himself.
    
      Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Robert M. Lyles, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.
   HAWKINS, Judge.

Relator presents to this court an original application for habeas corpus contending that a judgment condemning him to serve nineteen years in the penitentiary for the offense of robbery with firearms is void because the sentence failed to follow the law relative to indeterminate sentences, and diréct his imprisonment for not less than five nor more than nineteen years. This is an attempt to collaterally attack the judgment which we think is not void but subject to correction by direct proceeding in the trial court.

The writ is denied.

Writ denied.  