
    PAUL SMITH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. Billy R. CROWE et al., Respondents.
    No. 36356.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 28, 1967.
    E. O. Palermo, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for petitioners.
    Herboth S. Ryder, of Albritton, Sessums, Gordon & Ryder, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 7, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fes filed by Respondent Billy R. Crowe is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.  