
    3516.
    Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Andrews.
    Decided January 15, 1912.
    Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Calhoun.
    April 15, 1911.
    
      Tye, Peeples & Jordan, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Walter A. Sims, contra.
   Hill, C. J.

1. The exceptions taken to excerpts from the charge are supported by verbal inaccuracies, but there were no substantial or misleading errors; and the instructions, taken as a whole, fairly and clearly presented the issues.

2. There was conflict in the evidence, both as to the negligence alleged and the damages claimed. These conflicts were settled by the verdict; and as no error of law of a prejudicial character appears, no reason is shown for the grant of another trial. Judgment affirmed.  