
    (66 Misc. Rep. 212.)
    In re KANE.
    (Tompkins County Court.
    February 25, 1910.)
    1. Insane Persons (§ 34)—Committee-tAppointment.
    The purpose of the courts, in determining who shall be apopinted the committee of an insane person, is the welfare and comfort of such person and the conservation of his interests.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Insane Persons, Cent. Dig. § 49; Dec. Dig. § 34.]
    2. Insane Persons (§ 34)—Committee—Appointment.
    Where the members of the family of an insane person were not agreed as to which of two brothers, equally competent, should be appointed as committee, the court will appoint the brother whose relations to the incompetent have always been closest and most harmonious, and who has a more intimate knowledge of the incompetent’s affairs.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Insane Persons, Cent. Dig. § 49; Dec. Dig. § 34.]
    Application to confirm a jury’s finding and appointing a committee of the person and property of Edward Kane, an incompetent.
    Application granted.
    Champlin & Buck, for John P. Kane.
    John Courtney (M. N. Tompkins, of counsel), for Charles Kane.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic & § number in. Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes
    
   SWEETEAND, J.

In proceedings regularly had in the Tompkins County Court at the January term, a jury rendered a verdict finding Edward Kane an incompetent person and fixing the value of his property at $2,850. Edward Kane, the incompetent, is unmarried, and his parents are dead. This is a motion to confirm the findings of the jury and for the appointment of a committee of the person and property of said Edward Kane. It is conceded by all concerned that he is an incompetent person, and there is no opposition to the finding of the jury as to his incompetency and to the valuation of his property. But John P. Kane, a brother, has filed a petition asking that he be appointed committee of the person and property of said Edward Kane, which petition is supported by Thomas Kane, a brother, and by the affidavits of 12 other persons. On the other hand, Charles Kane, a brother of said incompetent, and Lizzie O’Brien, sister, have filed a petition asking that Charles Kane be appointed committee of the person and property of said incompetent, which petition is supported by the affidavits of 16 other persons.

The question to be determined is who is a proper person to act as committee of the person and property of said incompetent. The family is divided. As far as character and ability are concerned, either candidate is a suitable person for the office of committee in this matter. There are not many adjudicated cases which bear directly on the subject under consideration. The purpose of the courts has been, in such cases, to consider the welfare and comfort of the incompetent and his interests in making the appointment of a committee. Matter of Cooper, 105 App. Div. 449, 94 N. Y. Supp. 270. The incompetent and his brother Charles lived together all their lives on a farm in the town of Groton until last fall, when Edward Kane was committed as an insane person. It appears that Edward and Charles were much attached to each other, and that Edward, the incompetent, had intrusted the care and custody of his papers, consisting of promissory notes and bank certificates of deposit, to his brother Charles for safe-keepings and that Edward was somewhat estranged from his brothers Thomas and John P. Kane. The property of the incompetent consists of $1,850 in personal property and a farm valued at $1,000, on which there are no buildings, except the building used for keeping poultry. The products of the farm of the incompetent, including apples, potatoes, and vegetables, have been stored in the buildings on the farm occupied by Charles Kane, across the road from the farm of the incompetent. Both the incompetent and Charles Kane are farmers, interested in their work, and thrifty persons. Charles Kane, living and working daily within sight of his brother’s land, can with but slight expense superintend it and know what is its condition and needs. John P. Kane has been a school teacher, employed by an express company, and an insurance agent, and lives in Cortland, some five miles from the farm of the incompetent. It seems that he is not so thoroughly in touch with the interests of his brother, the incompetent, as is Charles Kane, and, conceding to John P. Kane equal capabilities for the position, he cannot manage the property of his brother with the economy that Charles Kane can, who lives in the immediate neighborhood of the incompetent’s property and is thoroughly acquainted with it.

A strong array of affidavits was produced from citizens of the highest character and standing, who unreservedly pronounce Charles Kane in all respects competent to fill the duties of the committeeship, stating that he is industrious, honest, competent, a good citizen, and prompt to meet his obligations. An additional qualification suggests itself in this: That, should the incompetent partly recover, he would be more comfortable back in his own neighborhood, on his own land, with his brother Charles, amid the familiar farm scenes of his life, where he has always lived, than elsewhere. The .interested parties are not able to agree on any person, either a relative, friend, or stranger to the blood, who is satisfactory to them as the committee for Edward Kane. The trust is of so great importance both to the incompetent and his family as to demand the utmost consideration. The value of the estate of the incompetent is not sufficient to justify the delay and expense of a reference (Matter of Eamoree, 32 Barb. 122), and both parties desire to submit the case on the very full affidavits presented. It seems to me that, if consistent with justice and good administration, a member of the family can be selected for such a position, the preference should be given a member of the family, and the same principle would suggest, where equally competent, that a member of the family be chosen who-is most in accord with the incompetent, and who is. most agreeable to him. It is clear, upon all the facts in this case, that Charles Kane is- the natural and proper pérson to be appointed committee of his brother Edward Kane. He is so situated that he can well administer the trust, and with but little cost to himself or to the -estate of the incompetent, and is thoroughly competent.

Ordered that the finding of the jury be confirmed, and Charles Kane be appointed committee herein.  