
    Mark Keith v. The State.
    No. 9786.
    Delivered February 3, 1926.
    Aggravated Assault — Evidence Held, Sufficient.
    No bills of exception complaining of any ruling of the court are presented in this record, and the evidence being quite sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.
    Appeal from the County Court-at-Law No. 1 of Tarrant County. Tried below before the Hon. P. W. Seward, Judge.
    Appeal from a conviction of an aggravated assault, penalty two years in the county jail.
    The opinion states the case.
    No brief filed for appellant.
    
      Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Nat Gentry, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.
   MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of two years.

The evidence shows without conflict that the appellant shot his wife several times with a pistol, inflicting upon her serious bodily injury. He attempted to justify or mitigate the offense upon the ground that his wife had separated from him and threatened to live with another man. This was controverted.

The issue of insanity was raised by the evidence and presented to the jury in the charge of the court.

The issue of self-defense was also presented in the charge, though we find little basis for it in the evidence.

There are no bills of exception complaining in any particular of the rulings of the court. The evidence is quite sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.  