
    Philip Meyer Company, Appellant, vs. Sheboygan Chair Company, Respondent.
    
      March 14
    
    April 4, 1899.
    
    
      Appeal: Findings of fact
    
    Findings of the trial court will not be disturbed on appeal unless against the clear preponderance of the evidence.
    Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Sheboy-gan county: N. S. G-ilson, Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    Action to recover for castings alleged to have been made especially for defendant. The defendant had judgment, from which the plaintiff appealed.
    For the appellant there was a brief by Benfey & Benfey, and oral argument by Theodore Benfey.
    
    
      Tronéis WilUams, for the respondent.
   Dodge, J.

No advantage can be gained from a discussion in the opinion of the facts in this case. Suffice it to say that, after a careful examination, we do not find any clear preponderance of evidence against the finding of the court that “ the plaintiff did not manufacture for the defendant, in accordance with its order and agreement, the articles sued for, and did not deliver the same to said defendant in accordance with any agreement to purchase the same by said defendant,” whether that finding is intended to repudiate the making of an agreement in fact by defendant’s foreman, or his authority on their behalf. That finding sustains the judgment.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.  