
    Lane against Shreiner.
    
      Saturday, March 26th.
    The day on which the verdict is given, is computed as one of the fomda>s which are Mowed to move for a new trial.
    IN this case a verdict was given for the plaintiff in the Circuit Court of Lancaster county on Tuesday; and on the Saturday following, a motion was made by the defendant for a rule to shew cause why there should not be a new trial. That Court however being of opinion that the motion was too late, because the day on which a verdict is given should be included.in the four days, refused the rule; and the defendant appealed to this court.
    The decision of the Circuit Court was affirmed without argument, upon the authority of Burrall v. Dublois. 
      
    
    
      Hopkins for plaintiff, E. Tilghman for defendant.
    
      
       2 Dall. 229.
    
     