
    Miguel CARRILLO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 12-71179.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 11, 2013.
    
    Filed Oct. 7, 2013.
    Xavier Gonzales, Xavier Gonzales, Attorney at Law, P.C., Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner.
    Sharon Michele Clay, Esquire, Trial, Oil, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: ALARCON and BERZON, Circuit Judges; and ZOUHARY, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

The only claim in his Petition is that Carrillo’s conviction of an aggravated felony was invalid because of ineffective assistance of counsel. That contention “is no longer supportable,” because Chaidez v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013), held Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), non-retroactive. Pet’r’s Suppl. Br. at 5.

DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     