
    
      No. 10,267.
    James v. The State.
    From, the Monroe Circuit Court.
    
      J. R. East and W. H. East, for appellant.
    
      D. P. Baldwin, Attorney General, H. C. Duncan, Prosecuting Attorney, and W. P. Rogers, for the State.
   Woods, J.

The appellant was adjudged to j)ay a fine of five dollars for selling, without license, intoxicating liquor in a quantity less than a quart. The disputed point in the case is whether there is sufficient evidence to show that the transaction, on which the prosecution was predicated, was a the contending that it was a

Our judgment is that the finding is supported by sufficient evidence: sufficient, at least, under the rules applicable to the consideration of questions of fact by this court.

Judgment affirmed, with costs..  