
    Samuel Arnow, Appellant, v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Respondent.
   Judgment dismissing the complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that we think it was a question for the jury to say whether or not there had been a misrepresentation of fact made by the insured in the answers in the application for the policy. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.  