
    On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed December 19, 1990,
    reconsideration allowed; former decision (104 Or App 446, 800 P2d 1094) withdrawn; affirmed February 20,
    reconsideration denied April 17,
    petition for review denied June 20, 1991 (311 Or 433)
    In the Matter of Gerri Ann Kelley, A Minor Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, v. Gerald KELLEY, Appellant.
    
    (8810-82881; CA A61921)
    805 P2d 163
    John P. Manning, Portland, for petition.
    Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Father has petitioned for review of our decision affirming the trial court without opinion. 104 Or App 446, 800 P2d 1094 (1990). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), allow it and affirm.

Father assigns as error the introduction of hearsay statements, under OEC 803(4), through testimony by a student intern training for a master’s degree in social work. On de novo review, ORS 419.561(4), we reach the same conclusion, even without that testimony, as did the trial court.

Father’s remaining assignments of error have no merit.

Petition for reconsideration allowed; former decision withdrawn; affirmed.  