
    Hershey et al. v. Brotherhood's Relief and Compensation Fund et al., Appellants.
    
      Appeals—Interlocutory decree—Quashing appeal.
    
    A decree overruling preliminary objections to a bill in equity and directing defendants to file an answer on the merits, is interlocutory, and no appeal lies from it.
    Argued October 4, 1927.
    Before Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaffer, JJ.
    Appeal, No. 5, May 2., 1928, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Dauphin Co., No. 835, Equity Docket, dismissing preliminary objection to bill and directing answer to be filed, in case of Isaac H. Hershey et al. v. Brotherhood’s Relief and Compensation Fund et ah
    
      Bill for accounting, receiver, injunction and general relief. Before Wickersham, J.
    The defendant filed preliminary objections alleging various grounds for dismissing tbe bill.
    Tbe court overruled tbe preliminary objections, refused to dismiss tbe bill, and directed defendants to file an answer to tbe merits witbin thirty days. Defendants appealed.
    
      Error assigned, inter alia, was decree, quoting record.
    
      Michael E. Stroup and J. Dress Pannell, for appellants.
    
      W. Justin Carter, Sr., and W. Justin Carter, Jr., for appellees.
    October 4, 1927:
   Per Curiam,

It appearing tbe decree appealed from in this case is interlocutory, tbe appeal is quashed.  