
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mark Anthony PEYSEN, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-10252 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 12/20/2016
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Mark Anthony Peysen, Pro Se
    Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Mark Anthony Peysen has moved for leave to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Peysen has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     