
    Louis E. Weinberg, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
    
    140 So. 782.
    En Banc.
    Decision filed April 12, 1932.
    22. M. Hu/ntley, for Plaintiff,in Error;
    
      Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, for the State.
   Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and upon motion of the Attorney General to affirm the said judgment, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.  