
    Aaron E. Katz, Appellant, v. David Liederman, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.
    John E. Roeser, for appellant.
    L. Levene (A. B. Schleimer, of counsel), tor respondent.
   Per Curiam.

There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The justice had the advantage of seeing the witnesses, and an opportunity of judging as to the credit to be extended to each of them. His decision, upon the conflicting testimony, should not be disturbed.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.  