
    In re Estate of Chipman.
    
      Court of appeals — Jurisdiction on appeal — Exceptions to inventory in probate court — Reviewed by common pleas court on appeal — Section 10640, General Code.
    
    The proceeding provided for in Section 10640, General Code, authorizing an appeal to the court of common pleas from an adjudication by the probate court of exceptions to an inventory of an estate in the course of administration, is purely statutory and appeal therefrom cannot be taken to the court of appeals.
    (Decided May 10, 1920.)
    Appeal : Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
    On Motion to dismiss appeal.
    
      Mr. John W. Cowell, for appellant.
    
      Messrs. Dickerson & Dickerson, for appellee.
   By the Court.

The appellant filed exceptions to the inventory of the estate of Joseph Chipman, deceased. The exceptions being overruled, an appeal was taken from the judgment of the probate court, under Section 10640, General Code. The court of common pleas in the hearing on appeal overruled the exceptions. To the judgment of the court of common pleas appellant has taken a further appeal to this court, and a motion is now interposed to dismiss this appeal.

The right to appeal to the court of appeals and the jurisdiction of this court to determine causes on appeal are fixed and determined by the constitution as amended in 1912 and can be neither enlarged nor curtailed by the general assembly. Cincinnati Polyclinic v. Batch, 92 Ohio St., 415; Wagner v. Armstrong, 93 Ohio St., 443, and State, ex rel. Fortini, v. Hoffman, Judge, 12 Ohio App., 341.

An examination of Section 10640 in its context shows the proceeding therein provided for to be purely statutory. It is not an equitable or chancery case. See Marleau v. Marleau, 95 Ohio St., 162, and West v. West, 100 Ohio St., 33. See also State, ex rel. Fortini, v. Hoffman, supra.

The motion to dismiss the appeal will be granted.

Motion to dismiss granted.

Shohl, P. J., Hamilton and Cushing, JJ., concur.  