
    54438.
    WALKER et al. v. HOWARD et al.
   Banke, Judge.

Relying on this court’s subsequent decision in Hughes v. Malone, 146 Ga. App. 341 (247 SE2d 107) (1978), which established a new rule of law regarding the role of expert testimony offered in support of summary judgment motions in malpractice cases, the Supreme Court on certiorari reversed our judgment in this case, reported at 144 Ga. App. 413 (241 SE2d 21) (1977).

Justice Jordan, dissenting to the Supreme Court’s majority decision, wrote: "The law was well settled at the time that opinion evidence alone would not support a motion for summary judgment. Therefore, there was no reason for the plaintiff to offer evidence opposing that offered by the movant for summary judgment. The plaintiff could not be required to anticipate that this court would abrogate this well-settled principle of law. The plaintiffs have been 'sandbagged’ by the majority opinion. At the very least, the case should have been remanded to give plaintiffs an opportunity to offer opinion evidence contrary to that offered by the defendant.” Howard v. Walker, 242 Ga. 406, 411 (249 SE2d 45) (1978).

This court is, however, bound by the Supreme Court’s majority decision; and, accordingly, our judgment reversing the trial judge’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant/attomey is reversed.

Decided February 13, 1979.

R. M. Bernhardt, for appellants.

Freeman & Hawkins, Paul M. Hawkins, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur.  