
    Susannah Nichols v. Thomas Cartwright.
    !>From Pasquotank.
    
      A. by deed “lent to his sister B. a negro slave and her increase, during her natural life, and at her death gave the said slave and her increase unto the heirs of his said sister, lawfully begotten of her body, forever.” Held, that the slave vested absolutely in B.
    Holloway Sawyer, by deed executed on 20th January, 1798, conveyed, in consideration of love and affection, to his sister Absala Sawyer, as follows, to-wit: “l lend to my sister Absala Sawyer, the use and labour of thy negro girl Lidda and her increase, during her natural life, and at her death ! give the said girl and her increase unto the heirs of my said sister, lawfully begotten of her body, forever.” The question submitted to the Court was, whether Absala Sawyer took the absolute estate in the negro girl Lidda, or an estate for life.
   Tavxor, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

A rule applied to chattels, is, that where a remainder is limited by such words, as if applied to realty would constitute an estate tail, the person to' whom it is given takes the property absolutely. The deed before us does not permit a doubt as to the intention of the maker, for the words are precisely such as would amount to an estate tail in real property. Absala Sawyer is to take the use and labor of the slave and her increase during her natural life, and at her death they are to go to the heirs of her body lawfully begotten. This is exactly the way in which an estate tail in lands would subsist, the tenant having it in his power to defeat his issue only by a fine and recovery, or lineal warranty with assets. From the whole tenor of the deed, the legal construction is, that Absala Sawyer took the negro girl absolutely.  