
    LOYD v. STATE.
    No. 16265.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 24, 1934.
    Rehearing Denied March 14, 1934.
    Leo Hart, of Gilmer, and Harvey P. Shead, of Longview, for appellant.
    Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, the punishment being assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges the offense. We find no statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant moves to set aside our affirmance of the judgment against him upon the ground that the charge of the' court, as same appears in the .transcript, is fundamentally erroneous. Without discussing at any length the proposition of the duty of this court to reverse upon an error in the charge which might be deemed wrong, in the absence of an exception to the charge, we observe that the particular complaint in this case is that the word “not” was omitted at a place pointed out in the motion for rehearing. A supplemental transcript forwarded to the clerk of this court by the clerk of the trial court, containing a certified copy of the paragraph of the court’s charge from which the word “not” appeared to have been omitted, makes clear that the omission of said word in the charge as it appeared in the transcript was an error of the clerk of the lower court. . The certified copy of the charge found in the supplemental transcript shows the word “not” was in the charge

The motion for rehearing will be overruled, as given.  