
    December 3, 1976.
    Appeal No. 75-30.
    
      Adam Farkas, plaintiff, pro se. Keenan, Rice, Dolan, Reardon & Kiernan, Leonard A. Kiernan, Jr., James A. Currier, for Albert M. Sadler and Elizabeth Sadler, defendants. Hanson, Curran, Bowen & Parks, Kenneth R. Neal, for Mary Adams.
    Adam Farkas v. Albert M. Sadler et al.
    
   Case is assigned to the calendar for December 13, 1976, 9:30 a.m. for oral argument. The plaintiff will be expected to show cause why his appeal should not be summarily disposed of because of this Court’s previous statement that in situations such as this the Court will not disturb a finding of the trial justice unless he was clearly wrong. Labree v. Major, 111 R.I. 657, 306 A.2d 808 (1973). He should also be prepared to discuss in what manner the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence on a material point and was clearly wrong. Malinowski v. Zalzal, 113 R.I. 90, 317 A.2d 875 (1974).  