
    Emmanuel Guerrero ELEAZAR, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 07-70404.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 26, 2008 .
    Filed March 11, 2008.
    Emmanuel Guerrero Eleazar, San Mateo, CA, pro se.
    
      Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Andrew B. Insenga, U.S. Department Of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Emmanuel Guerrero Eleazar, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Eleazar’s contention that the IJ violated his due process rights by not allowing his wife to testify, and by concluding Eleazar lacked the requisite good moral character because he gave false testimony to an immigration interviewer. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review procedural due process claims not raised before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     