
    BRAZILIA, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Catie RENFROW, Defendant/Appellant, and James Boice, Defendant.
    No. ED 96146.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 13, 2011.
    Thomas R. Carnes, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    William F. Whealen, Jr., Stephen J. Barber, Miller and Steeno, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Catie Renfrow, appeals from the judgment denying her motion seeking relief from a default judgment entered against her on February 5, 2007, in a rent and possession action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  