
    Dennis DETERS, Petitioner v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Respondent
    No. 16-3727
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 19, 2017
    Filed: May 24, 2017
    Dennis Deters, Pro Se
    Reggie Govan, Jerome M. Mellody, Amanda Bruchs Sheridan, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Chief Counsel for Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent
    Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Minnesota resident Dennis Deters petitions this Court for review after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) denied him a medical certificate needed to reestablish his private pilot’s license. He has also filed a motion to supplement the record.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, and we conclude that the FAA’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or without support in the law. See Reder v. Adm’r of FAA, 116 F.3d 1261, 1263 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). We deny the petition for review and deny as moot Deters’s motion to supplement the record.  