
    ALEXANDER v. RAINEY, County Treasurer.
    
    No. 1795.
    Opinion Filed March 21, 1911.
    (114 Pac. 710.)
    TAXATION — Property Subject — Lands of Indians. Section 4 of an act of Congress of May 27, 1908, c. 199, 35 'Stat. 312, 313, entitled “An act for the removal of restrictions from part of the lands of allottees of the Five Civilized Tribes, and for other purposes,” is valid, and under and by virtue thereof the lands of all allot-tees of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians from which restric-. tions have been or shall be removed, are subject to taxation under the general laws of the state equally with the property of all persons.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    Kane J., dissenting.
    
      Error from District Cowl, Hughes Countyj John Caruthers, Judge.
    
    Action by George A. Alexander against M. P. Rainey, County Treasurer. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
    Affirmed.
    
      W. L. Stwdevanl and Grant Foreman, for plaintiff in. error.
    
      Chai-Ies West, Atty. Gen., and Charles L. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
   DUNN, J.

The above-entitled cause presents error from the district court of Hughes county.

The issues presented are identical in all respects with those of the case of Gleason v. Wood, ante, 114 Pac. 703, except as the same are applicable to the allottees of the Creek or Muskogee Tribe of Indians, and the opinion of the court in that case is adopted and promulgated as the opinion in this one.

The judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the petition is accordingly affirmed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur; KANE, J., dissents.  