
    COURT OF SPECIAL SESSIONS-KINGS COUNTY,
    May 1915.
    THE PEOPLE v. FOTIS POULOS.
    Conducting business under fictitious name—Penal law, sec. 440. Where a restaurant is run under the assumed name of the “ Bristol ” no certificate being filed or the real name of the proprietor being advertised or posted, it is a violation of section 440, Penal Law, in the use of a fictitious name.
    Present :—Hons. Cornelius F. Collins, P. J.: George J. O’Keefe and John J. Freschi, JJ.
    
      Edward W. Cooper, Esq., Assistant District Attorney, for the People; Henry M. Fertig, Esq., for the defendant.
   Freschi, J.:

The defendant conducts and maintains a restaurant under the name, style and designation of “ Bristol,” an assumed name. This name is used by him in connection with the words “ oyster and chop house,” all of which is printed on the defendant’s show window and his bill of fare. Nowhere in or about his business place does the defendant advertise or post his real name. It is admitted that the defendant failed to file the certificate required by law (sec. 440, Penal Law). There is here a holding out and the conducting of a business under a fictitious name. The false name is held out to the public that is invited and induced thereby to patronize defendant. This is misrepresentation and tends to mislead and deceive. The scope of the statute, states the court in Black v. N. Y. Life Insurance Co. (70 Misc., 532, 533), is against those who design to use such name to deceitfully procure credit or injuriously mislead people by means of it. The statute has its foundation in public policy for the protection of the commercial community (Sinnot v. German-American Bank, 164 N. Y., 386; McArdle v. Thames Iron Works, 96 App. Div. 139, 140; Jenner v. Shope, 205 N. Y. 72; Gay v. Seibold, 97 N. Y. 474; People v. Whiting, 68 Misc. 806). Fraud or injury might be worked by the use of a false name. Reliance by the patron on the quality of the food served and the security of wearing apparel in a restaurant in a large degree depends upon the individual whose name figures as the owner of the business. A name has a commercial value which is protected in various ways. There is a possibility that a deception may be practiced or a patron imposed upon in such a way as to bring him some harm where the real owner is not disclosed.

The spirit and intent of the statute is to protect not alone creditors, but all persons who, in dealing with the defendant, may be placed in the relation of a creditor or claimant toward him.

The illegality consists in the use of the fictitious name.

I vote for a conviction.

All concur.  