
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-50820
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 17, 2014.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Luis Rodriguez, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
    Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rodriguez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Rodriguez’s motions for appointment of new counsel on appeal or for leave to proceed pro se are DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     