
    KATZ, Appellant, v. LIEDERMAN, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    July 6, 1900.)
    Action by Aaron E. Katz against David Liederman. From a judgment in favor of the defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. John E. Roeser, for appellant. L. Levene (A. B. Schleimer, of counsel), for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The justice had the advantage of seeing the witnesses, and an opportunity of judging as to the credit to be extended to each of them. His decision upon the conflicting testimony should not be disturbed. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.  