
    J. W. Netterstrom, Defendant in Error, v. Kinzie Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff in Error.
    Gen. No. 18,509.
    (Not to be reported in full.)
    Abstract of the Decision.
    1. Architects and engineers, § 3
      
      —when evidence sufficient to sustain claim for commissions. In an action by an architect for commissions, the evidence was held to sustain his claim that a contract was procured through an estimate and bid made by him, and that under an agreement with defendant he was entitled to commissions thereon.
    
      Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Perry L. Persons, Judge, presiding.
    Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.
    Affirmed.
    Opinion filed March 11, 1914.
    Statement of the Case.
    Action by J. W. Netterstrom against Kinzie Manufacturing Company to recover commissions on contracts secured for defendant through estimates and bids made by plaintiff. From a judgment for three hundred and twenty-five dollars, defendant brings error.
    Brady & Levy, for plaintiff in error; Josiah Burn-ham:, of counsel. ■
    Charles F. McKinley, for defendant in error.
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV, same topic and section number.
    
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, same topic and section number.
    
   Mr. Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob# § 1410 —when judgment not reversed as against evidence. A judgment will not be reversed as unsupported by evidence unless clearly and' manifestly against the weight of the evidence.  