
    MATTALINA CASAVALO, APPELLANT, v. SALVATORE D’AURIA ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued May 19, 1934
    — Decided September 27, 1934.
    Por the appellant, Harold Simandl.
    
    Por the respondents, Goult, Satz & Tomlinson.
    
   PEE CUBIAM.

Tlio judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Deae, Wells, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Peesiiie, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 3.  