
    HART v. STATE.
    (No. 3651.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 25. 1915.)
    Intoxicating Liquors <§=>238 — Criminal Prosecutions — Questions for Jury.
    Where, on a trial for violating the prohibition law, a witness swore positively that he purchased a bottle of whisky from accused and paid him therefor, while accused denied making the sale, there was a question for the jury.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Intoxicating Liquors, Cent. Dig. §§ 324-330; Dec. Dig. <@=> 238.]
    Appeal from Johnson County Court; B. Jay Jackson, Judge.
    Tom Hart was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of violating the prohibition law in Johnson' county, Tex., from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal; the only assignment of error being that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

S. Gordon swears positively to purchasing .a bottle of whisky from appellant, and says he paid him for it. It is true appellant denies making the sale, but this was a question for the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.  