
    In re Ali EBRAHIMZADEH, Respondent.
    No. 16-BG-88.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed May 12, 2016.
    Before BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge, and FARRELL and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of California suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of two years, stayed in favor of a six-month suspension followed by a two-year probationary period with conditions, this court’s March 2, 2016, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, respondent’s response stating that he did not oppose the imposition of reciprocal discipline, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that on March 14, 2016, respondent filed .an affidavit that satisfied the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) and the requirements of In re Goldberg, 460 A.2d 982 (D.C.1983), wherein he stated that he voluntarily ceased practicing law on January 15, 2016, it is

ORDERED that Ali Ebrahimzadeh is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of two years, stayed in favor of a six-month suspension, nunc pro tunc to January 15, 2016, to be followed by a two-year probationary period subject to the conditions imposed by the state of California. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).  