
    ROWLEY, Respondent, v. GORHAM, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    December 30, 1912.)
    Action by Eva K. Rowley against James A. Gorham, etc.
   PER CURIAM.

Order modified, by limiting the scope of defendant’s examination to matters- alleged in the second defense of the answer, relative to a release of the contract, and to so much of the third defense as relates to plaintiff’s alleged representations that at the time that the -promise, if any, was made, she was an unmarried woman, when in fact she had a husband living. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.  