
    BALTIMORE & O. R. CO., v. HAROLD et al.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    February 17, 1906.)
    No. 1,482.
    In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Arrel, McVey, Rowland & Harrington and Allen, Water & Andress, for plaintiff in error.
    Young & Wanamaker, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed, with costs, on the authority of the former opinion of this court. 133 Fed. 384.  