
    MARRICK v. FURNARI.
    On Rehearing.
    This case is controlled by GolcLstick v. Thomas, ante, 236.
    Appeal from Wayne; Marsehner (Adolph F.), J.
    Submitted October 9, 1925.
    (Docket No. 46.)
    Decided December 22, 1925.
    Resubmitted October 20, 1926.
    Former opinion vacated January 3, 1927.
    Bill by Louis Marrick and others against Joseph Furnari and another to restrain the violation of building restrictions. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal.
    Affirmed.
    
      Harold F. Coyle (George W. Moore, of counsel), for plaintiffs.
    
      Groesbeck, Sempliner, Kelly & Baillie and Rhodes, Garvett ■& Frankel (A. C. Stellwagen and Frank D. Eaman, of counsel), for defendants.
   On Rehearing.

Clark, J.

The facts are stated sufficiently in Marrick v. Furnari, 233 Mich. 146. The case is ruled by Goldstick v. Thomas, ante, 236.

Accordingly, the decree of the trial court, dismissing the bill, is affirmed, with costs to appellees.

Sharpe, C. J., and Bird, Snow, Steere, Wiest, and McDonald, JJ., concurred.

Justice Fellows took no part in this decision.  