
    No. 4712.
    Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.
    MATO PARUN VS. ADOLPH CLARK.
    Conclusions of foot reached by the Court of first instance will not be disturbed on appeal.
    Appeal from the Twenty-ninth Judicial District, Parish of ^Plaquemines.
    John Dymond, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    R. E. Ilingle for Defendant and Appellee.
   ST. PAUL, J.

This case .presents only a question of lacx, the solution of which depends entirely upon the degree of crecut to which the testimony of the various witnesses may be entitled -

May 31, 1909.

Their testimony is highly conflicting, but the District Judge saw and heard them all and took active part in their examination. He personally inspected the property about which they testified, and which forms the subject'of this controversy. His conclusions are therefore entitled to great •weight and should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous.

<¡)ur examination of the record does not warrant us in reaching the conclusion that there is any manifest error in the judgment appealed from, and it is accordingly affirmed.  