
    Yvonne PINKARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.L. NUSBAUM; Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy P.C.; Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, NRHA, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-1182
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 28, 2017
    Decided: July 19, 2017
    
      Yvonne Pinkard, Appellant Pro Se. James Thomas Cromwell, SYKES, BOUR-DON, AHERN & LEVY, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; David Caldwell Hartnett, CRENSHAW WARE & MARTIN, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees,
    Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yvonne Pinkard appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pinkard v. S.L. Nusbaum, No. 2:16-cv-00625-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 20, 2017 & entered Jan. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  