
    Before the Second Division,
    September 19, 1947
    No. 51905.
    Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States,
    protests 492557-G, etc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial counsel for the plaintiff established by the testimony of a qualified witness that the hats in question are similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.  