
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Laura Elena ARPAYAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-50411.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 14, 2004.
    
    Decided June 22, 2004.
    Anne K. Perry, Shanna L. Dougherty, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Kenneth J. Troiano, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, LEAVY and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Laura Elena Arpayan appeals the 27-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for bringing an illegal alien into the United States without presentation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

Arpayan contends that there was insufficient evidence to support an upward adjustment for creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury under U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(5). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the sentencing enhancement in this case. See U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(5), cmt. n. 6 (2002); United States v. Carreno, 363 F.3d 883, 890-91 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining that, in determining whether to apply § 2Ll.l(b)(5), “the district court must look at the facts in context and assess the degree of risk created by the totality of the defendant’s conduct”).

Arpayan also contends that she is entitled to a two-level downward adjustment for minor role. We disagree. Because Arpayan failed to carry her burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that she was “substantially less culpable than the average participant” in the offense, the district court did not clearly err by denying her request for a downward adjustment for minor role. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, cmt. n. 3 (2002); United States v. Hemandez-Franco, 189 F.3d 1161, 1160 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     