
    JARVIS v. DAVISON.
    (Supreme,Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 28, 1913.)
    Action by Howard B. Jarvis-against Estelle J. Davison.
   PER CURIAM.

Action dismissed, upon the ground that no person .interested and entitled to enforce the restriction is a party to the controversy, and that without such presence a decision as to them would be inoperative, and upon the further ground that the submission is not properly acknowledged.  