
    Chester H. Krum, Administrator of D. W. Bell, Respondent, v. Thomas J. Jones et al., Appellants.
    St. Louis Court of Appeals,
    March 8, 1887.
    1. Pleading — Aider, bv Yerdict. — A petition, whose defective statement of essential averments is supplemented by admissions of the answer, is sufficient after verdict.
    g. Practice, Appellate — Exceptions.—Where the only exception saved by the motion for a new trial is, that the verdict is against the evidence, the only question, aside from errors appearing on the record proper, that will be examined on appeal is, whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence.
    Appeal from the Phelps County Circuit Court, C. C. Bland, , Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    A. Corse, for the appellant:
    The petition will not support the verdict. Bowie 'o. Kansas City, 51 Mo. 454.
    Douglas & Soudder, for the respondent:
    A defective pleading is aided if the adverse party answer in such manner that an omission or informality be expressly or impliedly supplied or rendered formal. Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 629. Exceptions not saved in the motion for a new trial will not be considered on appeal. Chapman *. White, 52 Mo. 179.
   Rombauer, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A special appeal was granted in this case, upon ex-' hibition of a transcript of the record, by which it appeared that the petition, as set out in the transcript, failed to state a cause of action, and could not support a judgment for the plaintiff, rendered by the trial court.

A stipulation has since been filed in this court, by which it appears, that the petition on which the cause was tried was not embodied at all in the transcript thus exhibited, such transcript containing only a copy of an account stated, which was filed with the petition. The petition had been lost or mislaid, and was thus omitted by the clerk, in making out the transcript.

The petition on which the cause was tried has been supplied by agreement, between the parties, and, although inartificially drawn, is not devoid of any essential averment warranting a recovery. Its defective statements are supplemented by admissions of the answer, so as to render it unquestionably sufficient, after verdict. Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 629.

The action is upon an account stated. The answer •admits the settlement and account stated, but claims that the settlement was made under a mistake of facts, and further claims that the defendants, prior to the discovery of the mistake, had fully paid all that was due the plaintiff, and in fact overpaid him.

The cause was tried by the court, sitting as a jury, and the trial resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. A motion for new trial was filed by the defendants, stating as the only grounds why a new trial should be granted, that the finding of the court was against the ■evidence and the law, and that there was no evidence to support the verdict.

As, under settled rules, governing appellate procedure, this court can, with propriety, review such alleged errors only, as have been called to the attention of the trial court by motion for new trial; as the motion for new trial in this case saves no other point, but that the verdict is against the evidence, and as there is substantial evidence to support the verdict, it necessarily results that the judgment must be affirmed.

All the judges concurring, the judgment is affirmed.  