
    10938.
    Drury v. Cameron & Barclay Company.
    Decided March 3, 1920.
    Petition for certiorari; from Camden superior court — Judge Highsmith. September 13, 1919.
    
      Cowart & Vocelle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      S. C. Townsend, contra.
   Luke, J.

It appearing from the motion and the affidavit of counsel for the defendant in error that the judgment excepted to by the plaintiff in error has been paid by him, the' questions raised by the bill of exceptions have become moot, and the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  