
    No. 427
    BRAMSON v. BOGRAND
    Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
    No. 4514.
    April 30, 1923
    This opinion has no.t been published excepc in Abstract
    APPEAL — (1) No real question being before Appeals Court, decree entered in same terms as in court below.
    Vickery,, P. J., Sullivan and Levine, JJ.
    Appeal affirmed
    Attorneys — Mooney, Hahn, Loeser & Keough, for Bramson; W. B. Woods, for Bogrand.
   PER CURIAM:

Epitomized Opinion

The action in the lower court was based on an accounting of monies received by Bogrand while in possession of certain property and the transfer of that property to Bramson. The lower court awarded-the possession of the property to Bramson and ordered her to repay certain money to Bogrand. Held by the Court of Appeals in affirming decree of the lower court:

1. There seems to be no real question before this court and we think a decree ought to be rendered in favor of the defendant Bogrand in substantially the same terms as was entered in the court below.  