
    5630.
    Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Dozier.
    Decided February 3, 1915.
    Action for damages; from city court of Emanuel—Judge Raw-lings. January 3, 1914.
    
      Saffold & Jordan, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Horace M. Holden, T. N. Brown, contra.
   Wade, -J.

Viewing the charge of the court as a whole, there is no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error; a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, as the allegations of the petition were substantially proved as laid (Dozier v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 12 Ga. App. 753, 78 S. E. 203) ; and the verdict returned was not excessive. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.  