
    PEOPLE v. DONALD HAYWOOD
    Criminal Law — Larceny — Attempted Larceny Prom Motor Vehicle.
    Defendant’s claim that larceny from a motor vehicle was a completed offense is not a ground for setting aside his conviction of attempted larceny from a motor vehicle (MCLA §§ 750.92, 750.356a).
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    21 Am Jur 2d, Criminal Law § 110.
    Appeal from Genesee, Anthony J. Mansour, J.
    Submitted Division 2 October 6, 1970, at Lansing.
    (Docket No. 8,578.)
    Decided October 27, 1970.
    Donald Haywood was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of attempted larceny from a motor vehicle. Defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Robert F. Leonard, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Kuebler, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
    
      William J. Hayes, for defendant on appeal.
    Before: Levin, P. J., and T. M. Burns and J. E. Hughes, JJ.
    
      
       Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
    
   Per Curiam.

The defendant was charged with the offense of attempted larceny from a motor vehicle (MCLA §§ 750.92, 750.356a [Stat Arm 1962 Rev § 28.287, Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.588(1)]) and was convicted upon his plea of guilty.

He claims that the record shows that the completed offense was committed. That is not a ground for setting aside his conviction. See People v. Pickett (1970), 21 Mich App 246; People v. Collins (1968), 380 Mich 131.

The trial judge conducted an exemplary examination of the defendant before accepting his plea of guilty.

Affirmed.  