
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Copeland Jonathan FALLS, aka Copeland John Falls, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-50001.
    D.C. No. CR-00-01137-AHM-1.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 19, 2003.
    
      Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Copeland Jonathan Falls appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Falls’ counsel has filed a brief stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Falls has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     