
    STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN v. PILLON.
    Suspension of attorney from practice for one year and assessment of eosts is affirmed where the ruling of a three-judge panel confirming the findings of a grievance committee appears appropriate from the record.
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    7 Am Jur 2d, Attorneys at Law § 12 et seq.
    
    Appeal from Wayne, William F. Ager, Arthur E. Moore and Norman A. Baguley, JJ., presiding.
    Submitted June 4, 1970.
    (Calendar No. 13, Docket No. 52,795.)
    Decided August 19, 1970.
    Disbarment proceedings against Gregory M. Pillon. Order suspending defendant from practicing law in this state for one year and thereafter until such time as he shall make application for reinstatement to the bar and requiring defendant to reimburse the State Bar of Michigan for its actual and necessary expenses incurred by reason of the proceedings entered. Defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Louis Rosenzweig, for the State Bar of Michigan.
    
      Gregory M. Pillon, in propria persona.
    
   Per Curiam.

The ruling of the three-judge panel confirming the findings of the grievance committee appears appropriate from this record. The respondent was denied no constitutional rights by the rejection of the offered evidence of similar action by other attorneys. The misconduct charged and established by the proofs, was a serious breach of the canons of ethics governing the conduct of all practitioners.

The suspension from practice for one year and the assessment of costs to partially reimburse the Bar Association for its expenses in connection with processing these grievances, is affirmed.

T. E. Brennan, C. J., and Dethmers, Kelly, Black, T. M. Kavanagh, Adams, and T. Gr. Kavanagh, JJ., concurred.  