
    George A. Treadwell, Respondent, v. William C. Greene, Appellant.
    (No. 1.)
    
      Bill of particulars as to whether certain contracts wereoral or written, their date, and, whether made personally by the defendant or by an agent.
    
    "Where the complaint, in an action to recover compensation for services alleged to have been .rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant, sets forth the alleged contract of employment and a number of other agreements claimed to have been made between the parties with respect to the plaintiff’s compensation, the court, on motion of the defendant, may properly direct the plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars stating whether the contracts or agreements alleged in the complaint were oral or written, the dates when such contracts or agreements were' made, and whether they were made personally by the defendant or through an agent.
    Appeal by the defendant, William 0. Greene, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 4th day of August, 1903, denying the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars.
    
      M. E. Harby, for the appellant,
    
      Charles M. Demond, for the respondent.
   Ingraham, J.:

The defendant applied for a bill of particulars as to thirty different allegations of the complaint. The court below ordered the plaintiff to" specify whether the contract of employment set forth in the 4th paragraph of the complaint was oral or in writing, and whether said agreement was claimed to have been made and entered into by the defendant personally, or through his agent or attorney, and refused to grant the remainder of the relief applied for. The action is brought to recover the amount due to the plaintiff for services rendered to the defendant in selling certain mines specified in the complaint, in raising money thereon and in selling the stock of a corporation, plaintiff alleging that the defendant promised him that, in consideration of such services, the defendant would give and transfer to the plaintiff a large and considerable interest (the exact amount to be subsequently fixed) in said mines or. in the stock of any corporation which might be organized to own and develop the same, or in' the proceeds of any moneys or funds which the defendant might, realize by virtue of his ownership or rights therein, which request the plaintiff accepted. The complaint then alleges that, pursuant to said employment and contract, the plaintiff rendered certain services, and that between October or November, 1898* and , the 1st day of September, 1899, at various times and pursuant to said original contract' of employment, the defendant fixed the precise amount to which the plaintiff should be entitled in said mines and in said enterprise, and promised and agreed to and with the plaintiff that, in consideration of the services which had been rendered and which were to be rendered in the future pursuant to said contract, the plaintiff should have and receive an' undivided one-tenth interest in all of the said mines and mining claims mentioned in paragraph 3 of the complaint, and in all other Mexican mines and mining claims which should be conveyed by or through the defendant to a corporation to be organized, or one„-tenth of the capital stock of any corporation to which said mines should be transferred, or one-tenth interest in the proceeds thereof should they be sold outright.

The complaint sets up a number of other agreements claimed to have been made with the defendant in relation to the compensation to be received by the plaintiff for the services rendered or to be rendered, and we think that the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars stating whether these agreements alleged were in writing or'oral, the date when made, and whether they were made directly with the defendant or through an agent. The complaint contains a number of allegations the relevancy of which are not apparent, but we think that the defendant is not entitled to the particulars of the plaintiff’s claim except to the extent indicated.

The order appealed from should be modified by directing the plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars stating whether the contracts or agreements alleged in the complaint were in writing or oral, the dates when such contracts or agreements were made, and whether the same were made personally by the defendant or through an agent, and as thus modified the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs.

Van Brunt, P. J., Patterson, Hatch and Laughlin, JJ., concurred.

Order modified by directing plaintiff to serve bill of particulars stating whether the contracts or agreements alleged in complaint were in writing or oral, the date when such contracts or agreements were made, and whether the same were made personally by defendant or through an agent, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs.  