
    Doud et al. v. City of Cincinnati et al.
    
      Supreme Court — Dismissals—No constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 18340
    Decided March 18, 1924.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
    
      Mr. Fyffe Chambers, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. Saul Zielonka, city solicitor, and Mr. Frank K. Bowman, assistant city solicitor, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.  