
    Dorothy Carignan v. Robert Carignan
    No appearance for the appellee (plaintiff).
    
      Vincent J. Trantolo, for the appellant (defendant).
    Argued June 1
    decided June 1, 1976
   It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before August 16, 1976.  