
    Michael vs. Schroeder, et al.
    
    ert;llU01' against a benefit of the iu-'“Sovtlf, “j14™!* Allegations by *
    Appeal from Baltimore County Court. The appellant having petitioned for the beneiit of the insolvent laws, the appellees, his creditors, exhibited to the court certain allegations against his being discharged under those laws, praying that issues hi a summary way, without the form oi an action, might be directed to determine the truth of allegations. The petitioner made a suggestion, supported by affidavit, that he could not have a fair and trial in that court, and prayed that the record of the proceedings might be removed to Harford county court, to be there heard and determined. But the Court, [Nicholson, Ch. J. and Bland. A. J.] being divided in opinion, did not give the direction and order as prayed. The petitioner excepted, and appealed to this court, where the case was argued before Buchanan, Earle, Johnson and Martin, J. by
    
      Brice., for the Appellant, and by
    
      W. Dorsey for Appellee.
   JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. .  