
    Mary B. Child, complainant-respondent, v. C. H. Winans Company, a corporation, defendant-appellant.
    [Submitted October term, 1935.
    Decided January 31st, 1936.]
    
      
      Mr. Charles L. Hedden, for the complainant-respondent.
    
      Messrs. Whittemore & McLean (Mr. Siguard A. Emerson and Mr. Samuel Koestler, of counsel), for the defendant-appellant.
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery sustaining complainant’s claim that lands now owned by the defendant are subject to an equitable (vendor’s) lien for the payment of taxes and assessments on adjacent lands owned by the complainant.

We have examined the proofs and concur in the findings of Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

The decree will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.  