
    RAILWAY ADVERTISING CO., Respondent, v. BAGGOT, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    April 22, 1901.)
    Action by the Railway Advertising Company against At-more L. Baggot. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Milton Mayer, for appellant.
    Einstein & Townsend, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The sole question here is as to the extent of an agent’s authority. The evidence was conflicting. It was submitted to the jury in a fair and careful charge, and we see no reason to interfere with their verdict Judgment affirmed, with costs.  