
    David H. Houghtaling, Resp’t, v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Company App’lt.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
    
    
      Filed November 17, 1893.)
    
    
      Hawkins & Delafield {M D. Hawkins, of counsel), for app'lt; Cambers & Baughton, (W. P. Chambers, of counsel), for resp't
   Van Brunt, P. J.

For the reasons stated in the case of Bryce v. Same Defendant, 57 St. Rep., 116 (decided herewith), the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, with leave to withdraw the demurrer, and answer, on payment of the costs and disbursements of the appeal, and costs in the court below. All concur.  