
    Labrandon BODISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D13-6210.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 15, 2015.
    Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, appellant raises a scrivener’s error in his sentence. He notes that when the court orally pronounced his sentence in case number 2012-CF-50S, the court stated that sentence was to run concurrently with the sentences imposed in case number 2011-CF-622. However, in the written judgment and sentence, the court failed to place a check mark on the appropriate line indicating that the sentence in case number 2012-CF-503 was to run concurrently. Appellant preserved this issue by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). However, the trial court failed to rule on the motion within 60 days, and thus it was deemed denied. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(1)(B). The State was given the opportunity to respond to this Anders appeal pursuant to Harrison v. State, 146 So.3d 76, 80-81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), and agrees that the error should be corrected.

We reverse and remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement. See Knight v. State, 114 So.3d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Appellant need not be present for the correction of this scrivener’s error. Appellant’s judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED with instructions.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur. 
      
      
        Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
     