
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary AGRIMSON, aka Mary Elizabeth Wakeford, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-30012.
    D.C. No. CR-98-00043-CCL.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.
    
    Decided Oct. 18, 2005.
    Josh Van De Wetering, Office of the U.S. Attorney District of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    David F. Ness, Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mary Agrimson appeals her sentence imposed following the revocation of supervised release. Agrimson was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Agrimson has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Agrimson has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     