
    John Ellis Rohrer, Individually, etc., Respondent, v. Daniel W. Quinn, Jr., Appellant.
    Appeal from so much of an order as denies a motion for an order striking out certain allegations of the complaint.
   Per Curiam:

The order appealed from in so far as it denied the motion to strike out paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and 11, and so much of paragraph 10 as relates to the purchase of and payment for screens should be reversed and the motion granted. In all other respects it should be affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.  