
    St. John ads. Hubbard.
    An attachment ment”of-costs ordered by rule, will not be granted, unthebm of costs be served at the time of the demand.
    This was a motion for attachment for non-payment of costs ordered by rule of court. A certified copy of the rule and taxed bill were shewn to the person against whom the * ° attachment was asked, and payment demanded, but a copy bill of costs was not delivered to him ; which was now urged in opposition to the motion. rr
    
      Root, for the motion.
    
      J. Jl. Spencer, contra.
   By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The objection is well taken. There is a diversity of practice in this particular; in some instances a copy of -the taxed bill is served, in others, not. For the future, the court will require that a copy of the bill of costs be served at the time the original is shewn and payment demanded. The motion is denied.  