
    HALL & BRISCOE, Inc., v. CORPORATION COMMISSION.
    No. 24949.
    May 29, 1934.
    Cicero I. Murray, Lee B. Thompson, and W. A. Carlile, for plaintiff in error.
    Edwin Dabney, Proration Attorney, for defendant in error.
   OSBORN, J.

A stipulation filed by the parties hereto is to the effect that the issues of law and fact in this ease are identical with those in the case of McArthur-Pruitt, Inc., v. Corporation Commission, No. 24914, this day decided, 168 Okla. 365, 33 P. (2d) 504. It is further stipulated that a_ decision in that case shall govern in this case.

Therefore, upon the authority of said case, this day decided by this court, the order of the Corporation Commission is vacated, and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the same.

RILEY, C. J., CULLISON, Y. C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, BAY-LESS, and WELCH, J.T, concur. BUSBY, J., dissents.  