
    [No. 23294.
    
      En Banc.
    
    July 2, 1931.]
    Prank Edwards, Appellant, v. Harry W. Carroll, as City Comptroller, et al., Respondents, Marion A. Zioncheck et al., Interveners-Respondents.
      
    
    
      Peters, Evans & McLaren, Eygerman <£• Rosling, and Kennedy & Schramm, for appellant.
    
      A. C. Van Soelen and J. Ambler Newton, for respondent Harry W. Carroll.
    
      John F. Dore and William A. Gilmore, for interveners-respond-ents.
    
      
       Reported in 300 Pac. 1048.
    
   Per Curiam.

One of the judges of this court being incapacitated and absent on account of illness, this case was argued to the remaining eight judges sitting En Banc. These eight judges are divided in their opinions and there is no majority either for affirmance or for reversal.

Therefore the judgment of the lower court stands affirmed.  