
    [Civ. No. 2221.
    First Appellate District.
    September 24, 1917.]
    MALCOLM FRASER, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION et al., Respondents.
    Workmen’s Compensation Act—Findino op Commission—Sufficiency of Evidence.—Upon this application for a writ of review t'o annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission, it is held that the findings of the commission are supported by the evidence.
    APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission.
    The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
    William E. Billings, and Hankins & Hankins, for Petitioner.
    Warren H, Pülsbury, for Respondents.
   THE COURT.

The primary point presented by this petition and which ■ induced the issuance of the writ was the allegation that the new evidence which was received by the commission pursuant to stipulation was not rebutted by the petitioner because he was not given an opportunity to do so. Upon oral argument it is conceded that there is nothing in that point, so that is now out of the case. The only remaining contention is the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of the commission. A perusal of the record convinces us that the evidence in this respect is sufficient. The writ is therefore denied.  