
    Z. Gates v. J. M. Ransom.
    At the October Term, 1881, of the district court of Smith county, plaintiff Ransom had judgment against defendant Gates, who brings the case to this court.
    
      A. Sgxey, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Hays & Finn, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The questions in this case are precisely like those in Tarpenning v. Cannon, ante, p. 665. Therefore the judgment of the district court will be affirmed, excepting the part relating to costs; and the case will b.e remanded, with direction to the court below to retax the costs according to the views expressed in Tarpenning v. Cannon.  