
    SIEDER v. JEROME.
    Bills and Notes — Dishonor—Notice.
    In action on promissory note, where testimony shows that indorser was given notice of dishonor, as required by statute (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9338), judgment for plaintiff is affirmed, on appeal by indorser.
    Appeal from Wayne; Lamb (Fred S.), J., presiding.
    Submitted January 6, 1932.
    (Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 36,085.)
    Decided April 4, 1932.
    
      Assumpsit by Charles P. Sieder against George Jerome and others on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Jerome appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Y erices, Goddard & McGlintock (G. Upton Shreve and F. W. Donovan, of counsel), for plaintiff.
    
      James B. Van Vediten, Jr. (Edmund J. Stafford, of counsel), for defendant Jerome.
   Fead, J.

In this action on a promissory note, as the testimony shows that the indorser, Jerome, was given notice of dishonor, as required by statute (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9338), judgment for plaintiff is affirmed, with costs.

Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.  