
    BORLAND v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 25, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097*) — Appeal — Questions Review able — Sufficiency of Evidence — Statement op Facts.
    In the absence of a statement of facts in the record, the question of the sufficiency of the testimony, raised in the motion for new trial, cannot be considered on appeal. .
    [Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926. 2934 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dee. Dig. 1 1097.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Potter County; James N. Browning, Judge.
    P. L. Borland was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    O. E. Lane, Asst Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of violating the prohibition law, and his punishment assessed at one year’s confinement in the state penitentiary.

The only grounds in the motion complain of the insufficiency of the testimony. No statement of facts accompanies the record. Consequently we cannot pass on th.ose grounds of the motion.

The judgment is affirmed.  