
    Rose, by etc., v. Hebenstreit.
    
      Negligence — Attractive nuisance — Statical condition made perilous.
    
    (No. 15877
    Decided May 27, 1919.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
    
      Mr. W. H. Rucker and Mr. Thomas Usher, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Darby & Benedict, for defendant in error.
   Judgment reversed on authority of Ziehm, by etc., v. Vale, 98 Ohio St., 306.

Judgment reversed.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker and Robinson, JJ., concur.  