
    Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Fanny H. Hurcomb, Deceased.
    
      (Surrogate’s Court, New York County,
    
    
      Filed January, 1902.)
    TRANSFER TAX — A PLEDGE REDEEMED BY THE PLEDGOR’S EXECUTOR IS TAXABLE AGAINST THE PLEDGOR’S ESTATE.
    Where the executor, of a resident decedent who pledged her stock in a domestic bank as collateral to a loan made her by it, pays off the loan and redeems the stock, it becomes presently taxable as a part of her estate for the pledgee no longer has any interest in it which requires protection.
    Appeal by tbe comptroller from an order assessing tbe transfer tax.
    Edward G. Whitaker, for executrix; Edward H. Fallows, for comptroller. %
   Eitzgeeald, -S.

— Decedent was a resident of this State. At tbe time of ber death she was indebted to the Hamilton Bank of this city in the sum of $2,000, tbe bank bolding as collateral security therefor shares of capital stock of the market value of $24,000. Prior to tbe institution of tbe tax proceeding tbe executor redeemed the stock by paying tbe loan with interest. The. appraiser omitted from the taxable estate appraised the value of said shares. From tbe order entered accordingly this appeal is taken by the comptroller. The appraiser .and tbe counsel for tbe executrix rely upon tbe Pullman case. 46 App. Div. 574. That case, however, instead of being an authority to sustain the order, is a precedent for its reversal. In tbe Pullman case it appeared that the transaction remained in tbe same State at the time of tbe appraisal as at the time of death, that the security bad not been resorted to by tbe pledgee, nor bad the personal representative paid tbe loan and redeemed the collateral. This circumstance is expressly referred to in the opinion of J ustice Patterson, for he says: “These securities are liable to be resorted to by the creditors. In pledge the title to them is in the pledgee and they are not in a situation to be taxed now as property of the estate of Mr. Pullman. All of their amount may be required to pay the debts to which these bonds and stocks are collateral and the creditor’s security should not be diminished at this time.” The question of residence or non-residence of the decedent would make no difference, for in the Pullman case the assets of the nonresident decedent which were referred to in the opinion were bonds actually located in this State and stocks of domestic corporations, so that they were taxable assets independent of residence. While the debt secured by the pledge of collatral is unliquidated, and the extent of the equity is unascertainable, as was the case in the Matter of Pullman, it may be well that the taxation of any equity therein would be postponed until the transaction had been completed and the value of the decedent’s interest therein determined. But after the transaction had been closed, and the interest of the estate therein fixed by redemption of the collateral — to paraphrase the language of Justice Patterson— those securities are no longer liable to be resorted to by creditors ; the title to them has reverted to the state of the pledgor, and they are in a situation to be taxed as property of the estate. They can no longer be required to pay the debts to which they were pledged as collateral, and there is no longer a necessity for protecting the creditor’s security, his relation to the matter having terminated. The appeal is sustained, and the matter remitted to the appraiser for a new report accordingly.

Appeal sustained and matter remitted to appraiser for new report.  