
    Meyers v. Cohn.
    (City Court of New York
    General Term,
    March, 1893.)
    An order denying a motion for a new trial was not entered. Held,, that an appeal from the judgment only brought up for review errors committed on the trial.
    Appeal from judgment entered on verdict in favor of plaintiff.
    
      O. Meyers and JR. JMJ. JEJemry, for defendant (appellant).
    
      H. JMJoses and JE. W. S. JoJmston, for plaintiff (respondent).
   .Ehrlich, Ch. J.

We have repeatedly enforced the rule that where no order is entered denying the motion for a new trial on the judge’s minutes, the appeal brings up for review only such errors as were committed at the trial. McArdle v. Smith, 1 Misc. Rep. 4, cases cited.

No order was entered in this instance, and the rule must be applied.

The action was for brokerage in selling certain real estate belonging to the defendant. The case went to the jury on. conflicting evidence, and they found for the plaintiff. No-error appears to have been committed during the trial to the prejudice of the defendant, and as the facts are not before us for review, we must affirm the judgment, with costs.

McGown and Fitzsimons, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.  