
    118 F. 1019
    PIPER v. CASHELL et al.
    No. 853.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    1902.
    H. E. Shields and C. S. Hannum, for plaintiff in error.
    Samuel Knight, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled cause, counsel for the defendants in error having called the attention of the court to the fact that counsel who signed the brief for the plaintiff in error therein are not members of the bar of the circuit court of appeals, thereupon the court held that briefs which were not signed by counsel whose qualifications were consistent with the requirements of rule 7 of the court (31 C.C.A. cxliv, 90 F. cxliv) would not be considered by the court.  