
    STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur HOWELL, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 60655.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 4, 1992.
    John Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b).  