
    16285.
    Hart v. The State.
    Decided March 27, 1925.
    ' Conviction of possessing intoxicating liquor; from Fulton superior court—Judge E. D. Thomas. January 10, 1925.
    
      J. Walter LeCraiv, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, Ralph II. Pharr, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was demanded by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  