
    Rogers et al. v. Roberts, judge.
    Practice in Supreme Court. Mandamus.
    After a judge has corrected, signed and certified a bill of exceptions, having interlined in the certificate a reference to the corrections made by him, and the plaintiff in error has served and filed the bill of exceptions thus certified, and caused it, together with the record, to be transmitted to this court, thereby recognizing and adopting such bill of exceptions as sufficient, it is too late to apply to this court for a mandamus to compel the judge to omit the corrections he had made in the bill of exceptions as originally presented to him, and sign another certificate free from such interlineation.
    November 23, 1891.
    Martin & Smith and A. C. Pate, for the relators.
   Mandamus denied.  