
    GRADY v. HOLLIDAY et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
    November 10, 1915.)
    In the matter of the claim of Thomas R. Grady for compensation uader the Workmen's Compensation Law (Con-sol. Laws, c. 67) against Charles T. Hoiliday, employer, and the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, insurance carrier.
   PER CURIAM.

Award reversed, and claim dismissed, on the ground that the claimant, at the time of the accident, was not engaged in a hazardous employment as defined by the statute. HOWARD, J., dissents.'  