
    Carlisle v. The Evansville, Indianapolis, and Cleveland Straight Line Railroad Company.
    APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.
    
      L. Barbour and J. D. Howland, for the appellant.
    
      O. H. Smith, for the appellees.
   _Per Curiam.

The defense, attempted to be set up, was, that the note was given on a stock subscription, and that certain verbal representations were made by the agents of the company preceding said subscription.

This question has been settled. Eakright v. The Logansport, &c., Railroad Co., and authorities there cited, at this term .

The judgment is affirmed with costs. 
      
      
        Ante, 404.
     