
    Crawford, Master, v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.
    
      (District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
    
    May 29, 1885.)
    DEMURRAGE — Crowded Wiiaiif — Diligence in Unloading Vessel.
    "Whore a vessel loaded with wood was delayed several days by reason of the crowded condition of the wharf, and it appeared that due diligence was used to unload her, held, that her owner was not entitled to demurrage.
    In Admiralty.
    
      Henry B. Edmunds, for libelant.
    
      E. TIunn Hanson, for respondent.
   Butler, J.

The respondent -was bound to take the cargo with reasonable diligence. This was the extent of his obligation. That he did take it with such diligence seems clear. I am not satisfied that he could have done more than he did, under the circumstances. Furthermore, he appears to have warned the libelant, On arrival, that ho would not be responsible for the vessel’s detention; and advised him to go elsewhere, if unwilling to remain with this understanding. The weight of the testimony sustains this view.

The libel must be dismissed.  