
    STATE v. RAY MITCHELL.
    
    January 26, 1940.
    No. 32,258.
    
      Sam J. Levy, for appellant.
    
      J. A. A. Burnquist, Attorney General, M. Tedd Evans, Assistant Attorney General, R. S. Wig gin, City Attorney, and J. A. Hadley, Assistant City Attorney, for the State.
    
      
       Reported in 290 N. W. 222.
    
   Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.  