
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Emanuel Dandre WADE, also known as Marcus, also known as Emanual Dandre Wade, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-20744 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 10/24/2016
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Emanuel Dandre Wade, Pro Se
    Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Emanuel Dandre Wade has moved for leave to withdraw and has ñled a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Wade has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Wade’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Wade’s response. Wade’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir, R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4,
     