
    Arthur Edmundson, Jr. v. Miguel F. Rivera
    
      Edward F. Kunin, for the plaintiff (appellant).
    No appearance for the defendant (appellee).
    Argued May 6
    decided May 6, 1975
   It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the plaintiff files his brief on or before June 17, 1975.  