
    Joseph H. Newins and Another, Plaintiffs, v. H. Eckford Rose, Defendant.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

No opinion.

Cullen, J.:

I vote to affirm without opinion. The testimony of Seaman that he did not sell the goods to defendant was erroneously admitted against defendant’s objection and exceptions and was a mere statement of conclusion. He did not state what the transaction was nor deny defendant’s statement that nothing was said between them reserving the goods plaintiffs had sold Seaman.  