
    No. 65739.
    E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States,
    protests 214319-K, 273648-K, and 214320-K (Ogdensburg).
   Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.  