
    No. 121
    First Publication of this Case
    DONLEY v. STATE
    No. 20251.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Jan. 5, 1927,
    5 Abs. 27.
    333. CRIMINAL LAW — Is fact that fine and sentence not complying with Sec. 13717 GC. which provides that persons so imprisoned shall receive credit of $1.50 per day to apply on fines, ground for reversal?
    Attorneys — Wm. J. Corrigan for Donley; G. E. Hartshorn for State; all of Cleveland.
   Mose Donley contends in the Supreme Court that failure to comply with Sec. 13717 GC. which provides a credit of $1.50 per day to apply on fine, and because of such omission he is entitled to reversal.  