
    Elmira Fulton, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., App’lt.
    Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.
    
      A. I. Sire, for resp’t; Arnour, Ritch & Woodford, for app’lts.
   Bischoff, J.

No sufficient ground is assigned in support of this motion. Reference to the opinions, 47 St. Rep., 111, disclose that no novel question of law was involved in the appeal, which is our only justification for adding to the seriously lengthened calendar of the court of last r. sort. Hence the leave asked for, if granted, could result only in vexatious delay and expense to the respondent. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Daly, Ch. J., and Pryor, J., concur.  