
    No. 47560.
    Protests 933450-G, etc., of L. Bamberger & Co. (New York)
   Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Bullocks v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty. The protests were therefore sustained as to certain of the items.  