
    Carson vs. Sheldon.
    [Hall, J., did not preside in tills ease.j
    Where a bill sought to restrain the enforcement of a judgment at law, and open it for defences which could have been set up at law,' and it appeared that the suit was on a promissory note, and that no plea or defence of any sort was filed; that the complaint was that the defendant in the suit was prevented from defending by some efforts at compromise, although he was present and made no defence ; and where all fraud was sworn off by the answer and depositions, and the equiiy of the bill, if any, was thus fully met, the case was one of disputed facts, and the discretion of the chancellor in refusing an injunction will not be controlled.
    Judgment affirmed.
    October 21, 1884.
   Jackson, Chief Justice..  