
    Reno v. The State on the relation of Ackerett.
    
      Tuesday, June 5.
    A cause was submitted after May 28, 1853, and before the statute dispensing with printed briefs was enacted, on a general assignment of errors, without brief. Held, that the failure to specify any error was a tacit admission that none existed.
    ERROR to the Jackson Circuit Court.
    
      F. Emerson, for the plaintiff.
    
      W T. Otto, for the state.
   Stuart, J.

This case stands submitted since May 28, 1853, on a general assignment of errors, without brief.

The failure to specify any error is a tacit admission that none exists.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.  