
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Santiago, Appellant.
    [932 NYS2d 718]
   Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for an adjournment of the Sex Offender Registration Act hearing (see People v Sherard, 73 AD3d 537 [2010]; People v Wright, 53 AD3d 963, 964 [2008]; People v Ellis, 52 AD3d 1272, 1273 [2008]; People v Di John, 48 AD3d 1302, 1303 [2008]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P, Angiolillo, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.  