
    C. P. Fox v. The State.
    No. 4906.
    Decided February 20, 1918.
    Manslaughter—Sufficiency of the Evidence—Self-defense.
    Where, upon trial of murder and conviction of manslaughter, the court’s charge was full in submitting every issue in defendant’s favor, and the evidence being sufficient to sustain t'he conviction, there is no reversible error.
    Appeal from the District Court of Haskell. Tried below before the Hon. Jno. B. Thomas.
    Appeal from a conviction of manslaughter; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
    The opinion states the case.
    Ho brief on file for appellant.
    
      
      E. B. Hendricks, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of manslaughter and assessed the lowest punishment.

There are no hills of exception and no complaint of the court’s charge. That appellant stabbed and cut deceased with his knife and killed him is an established fact and not disputed.

The testimony by the State was .clearly sufficient to show appellant guilty of manslaughter, if not of murder, and to disprove appellant’s claim that he killed deceased in self-defense; while the testimony of appellant, if believed, might have been sufficient to have authorized his acquittal. It was a question for the jury and they solved it against appellant. The charge of the court was full and apt submitting every issue in appellant’s favor which was authorized or raised by the testimony. There is no complaint in any particular to the court’s charge. Under the circumstances we are not authorized to disturb the verdict.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.  