
    13716.
    Farmer v. White Sewing Machine Company.
    Decided February 16, 1923.
   Jenkins, P. J.

There being in the bill of exceptions no exception to any ■ final judgment, but only an exception to a judgment striking the defendant’s pleas, no question is presented which this court has jurisdiction to decide. This is true even though there is a recital in the bill of exceptions that the case was finally terminated by a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.” McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544 (73 S. E. 701); Simmons v. Peagler, 7 Ga. App. 252 (66 S. E. 629); Whidden v. Merry, 8 Ga. App. 564 (69 S. E. 1085). See also Hendricks v. Reid, 125 Ga. 775 (54 S. E. 747); Newberry v. Tenant, 121 Ga. 561 (49 S. E. 621); Harrell v. Tift, 70 Ga. 730; Montgomery v. Reynolds, 124 Ga. 1053 (53 S. E. 512); Lyndon v. Ga. Ry. &c. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (3) (58 S. E. 1047); Mertins v. Pritchard, 135 Ga. 643 (2) (70 S. E. 328); Roddenbery v. Patterson, 136 Ga. 187 (71 S. E. 138); Hodges v. Citizens Bank, 146 Ga. 624, 627 (92 S. E. 49). Under the authorities cited, the motion to dismiss by the defendant in error must be sustained.

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Complaint; from city court of Tifton — Judge Price. June 3, 1922.

Smith & Christian, for plaintiff in error.

Fulwood & Ilargrett, contra.  