
    STEPHEN D. PRINGLE, Respondent, v. HENRY S. LEVERICH, et al., Appellants.
    Before Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick, J.
    
      Decided June 18, 1880.
    Appeals by the defendant Leverich from orders made at the special term denying his motion for bill of particulars.
    The orders were affirmed upon the ground that the books upon which the claim in suit was founded were open to appellant’s inspection and under his control.
    
      Platt, Gerard & Bowers, attorneys, and J. M. Bowers, of counsel, for appellant.
    
      Stickney & Shephard, attorneys, and Albert Stickney, of counsel, for respondent.
   Curtis, Ch. J.,

wrote for affirmance, with costs; Sedgwick, J., concurred.  