
    Willie Mack WALTON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gail LEWIS, Warden; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
    No. 98-56396.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
    
    Decided Dec. 12, 2005.
    Willie Mack Walton, San Quentin, CA, pro se.
    
      Chung L. Mar, Esq., Office of Attorney-General of California, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
    Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Willie Mack Walton appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction for second degree murder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Walton contends that his Sixth Amendment right to present a defense and his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process were violated by the trial court’s exclusion of the preliminary hearing testimony of a witness. Because the state court’s decision on this issue was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by the United States Supreme Court, we affirm the district court’s decision denying relief. See Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400, 410, 108 S.Ct. 646, 98 L.Ed.2d 798 (1988) (accused does not have unfettered right to present evidence that is inadmissible under standard rules of evidence).

Walton’s request to broaden the Certificate of Appealability is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     