
    Beruhard Metz v. American Credit Indemnity Co.
    Sup. Ct. 1 D.
    June 14, 1895.
    
      W. F. Upton, for the motion; John V. Bouvier, Jr., opposed.
   Per Curiam.

— Under the contract by which Abraham was employed by the; defendant, who had no authority to hind the defendant to pay commissions to the plaintiff ; and, besides, there is no evidence that Abraham assumed to bind the defendant. The motion for new trial should be denied, and judgment ordered dismissing the complaint, with costs.  