
    In re: INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE MARKETING, INC., Debtor, Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP and Jenkins Mulligan & Gabriel, LLP, Appellants, v. Integrated Knowledge Marketing, Inc., d/b/a IKM; et al., Appellees. In re: Integrated Knowledge Marketing, Inc., Debtor, Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP and Jenkins Mulligan & Gabriel, LLP, Appellants, v. Integrated Knowledge Marketing, Inc., d/b/a IKM; et al., Appellees.
    Nos. 07-56818, 07-56849.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 10, 2011.
    
    Filed May 16, 2011.
    Daniel H. Gill, Esq., Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, for Appellants.
    Before: GOODWIN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and O’GRADY, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
      The Honorable Liam O’Grady, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C § 327, Ezra Brutz-kus Gubner L.L.P. and Jenkins Mulligan & Gabriel L.L.P. were hired as joint special counsel to prosecute claims on behalf of the Chapter 7 Trustee. They now appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s decision affirming: (1) the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of the case; and (2) the bankruptcy court’s separate order on administrative fees and costs. Substantially for the reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s unpublished memorandum in this matter, 2007 WL 7540949, 2007 Bankr.LEXIS 4845 (9th Cir. B.A.P. Nov. 6, 2007), we affirm.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     