
    No. 970
    STATE ex REITERMAN v. TRACY et
    No. 20075.
    Supreme Court
    In Mandamus.
    Dock. Aug. 29, 1926;
    4 Abs. 606.
    747. MANDAMUS — Will mandamus lie against the state highway commission to compel it to pay for land for which a deed has been given and recorded?
    Attorneys — E. L. Hensel and E. H. Davis for State ex; C. C. Crabbe, Atty. Gen., for Tracy; all of Columbus.
   This is a petition in mandamus to compel the state highway department to pay the purchase price of land sold to said department as a site for division garage, the deed already having been delivered and recorded.  