
    Davis Yves NICOLAS, Appellant, v. Minouche BLANC, Appellee.
    No. 3D14-2331.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 30, 2015.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 12, 2015.
    
      Hegel Laurent, for appellant.
    Yolande Henry Van Dam; Barbara Green, Hayward, for appellee.
    Before LAGOA, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ. . ,
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Davis Yves Nicolas (“Father”), appeals a final order granting the petition of Appellee, Minouehe Blanc-(“Mother”), to relocate to Georgia. Father contends that there was no competent and substantial evidence to support the court’s final order. Having reviewed the trial court’s thorough order, and the record evidence upon which it was based, we find that the trial court properly considered and applied the requisite and applicable factors set forth in section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes (2014), and articulated findings of fact which were supported by the competent substantial evidence presented. We, affirm the trial court’s order granting relocation. . 
      
      . Father raises two additional issues, each of which we find to be without merit, and only one of which warrants any further discussion.' Father asserts that, on '{he day of the final hearing, Mother provided Father with a copy of a letter from her. prospective employer in Georgia. Before the hearing began, Father moved to exclude the letter as' a potential exhibit, given that Mother provided it to Father immediately before the hearing. The trial court denied the motion to exclude, but indicated it would hear further objections if and when Mother sought to introduce the letter during the hearing. The record establishes that Mother never sought to introduce the letter into evidence and there is nothing in the record to suggest the letter was considered by the trial Court. Any asserted error resulting from the court’s pretrial ruling was therefore harmless.
     