
    Oralia MUNOZ-LECHUGA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 08-71768.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 19, 2010.
    
    Filed Aug. 2, 2010.
    Oralia Munoz-Lechuga, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner.
    Edward Earl Wiggers, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Of-fiee of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Las Vegas, NV, for Respondent.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Oralia Munoz-Lechuga, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant and remand the petition for review.

Because the BIA failed to address the ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised by Munoz-Lechuga in her motion to accept her late-filed brief, we remand for the BIA to consider her claim in the first instance. See Singh v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 1006, 1015 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     