
    Fosdick v. City of Cincinnati et al.
    (No. 25414
    Decided June 5, 1935.)
    
      Mr. Robert Fosdick, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. John D. Ellis, city solicitor, Mr. Edgar B. Traver, Mr. Leonard 8. Shore, Mr. Louis J. Schneider, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Walter M. Locke, for defendants iul error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Whhams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.  