
    Richard Woodson et al., Defendants in Error, v. J. G. Schroer, Plaintiff in Error.
    1, Mann v. Schroer, ante, p. 306, affirmed.
    
      Error to Henry Circuit Court.
    
    
      F. P. Wright, for defendants in error.
    
      J. LaDue, for plaintiff in error.
   Adams, Judge,

delivered’the opinion or tne court.

The record in this case is precisely the same as that in the case of Mann v. Schroer, ante, p. 314, and the judgment must be the same and the rulings the same.

The nunc pro tunc judgment in the case is reversed and the cause remanded, with leave to the plaintiff to renew his motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment.

The other judges concur.  