
    [No. 26524.
    Department One.
    May 24, 1937.]
    The City of Tacoma, Respondent, v. Ed Heinricy, Appellant. 
    
    P. L. Pendleton and W. G. Palmer, for appellant.
    
      Howard Carothers, Bartlett Rummel, and George F. Abel, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 68 P. (2d) 1031.
    
   Per Curiam.

The defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion that gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. On authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.  