
    CAMPBELL CONCRETE OF CALIFORNIA INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff—Appellant, Campbell Concrete of Nevada, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant—Appellant, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., a New Jersey corporation; Willis Construction Services of New Jersey, a New Jersey corporation; AI Credit Corporation, Defendants, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, a member of the American International Group Inc.;—National Union Fire Insurance Co., a member of the American International Group Inc.; Lexington Insurance Company, a member of the American International Group Inc.; American Home Assurance Company, a member of the American International Group Inc., Defendants-counter-claimants, and Premium Finance Specialists Inc., a Missouri corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant—Appellee.
    No. 04-57140.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 5, 2007.
    
    Filed Feb. 12, 2007.
    Craig E. Lindberg, Esq., The Williams Law Firm, PC, Newport Beach, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant and for Plaintiff-counter-defendant — Appellant.
    Jeffrey A. Rosenfeld, Esq., DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, US LLP, Catherine D. Meyer, Esq., Pillsbury Madison, et al., LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Elizabeth A. Kendrick, Esq., Keesal Young & Logan, Long Beach, CA, for Defendants.
    Lawrence C. Meyerson, Esq., Lawrence C. Meyerson, A P.L.C., Beverly Hills, CA, for Defendant-counter-claimant — Appellee.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

After a de novo review, there was sufficient admissible evidence in the district court’s file to establish that there were no genuine issues of material fact. See Carmen v. S.F. Unified School Dist., 237 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir.2001).

Therefore, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     