
    19995.
    Clark v. The State.
    Decided November 12, 1929.
    
      M. B. Huíanles, Norman Shattuclc, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. Neil Andreivs, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. There is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.  