
    Harmon v. The State.
    Argued March 19, —
    Decided April 4, 1900.
    Indictment for robbery. Before Judge Candler. Fulton, superior court. September term, 1899.
    
      B. R. Shropshire, for plaintiff in error.
    
      G. D. Hill, solicitor-general, contra.
   Lumpkin, P. J.

The sole question presented here being whether the evidence was sufficient to identify the accused as the perpetrator of the of- ' fense, and there being positive testimony warranting a finding that he was the guilty party, it does not appear that the court abused its discretion in denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.  