
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roberto Carlos HOLLMAN-SANABRIA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10552.
    D.C. No. CR-03-00100-DCB.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 10, 2004.
    
    Decided May 14, 2004.
    Julia Soto Maldonado, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Rosemary Marquez, Montoya & Marquez, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Roberto Carlos Hollman-Sanabria appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision to grant a two-level, rather than a four-level, downward departure for savings to the government. United States v. Dickey, 924 F.2d 836, 838 (9th Cir.1991) (the extent to which a district court chooses to exercise its discretion in fixing a downward departure is not reviewable on appeal). We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s failure to depart based on Hollman-Sanabria’s extraordinary mental and emotional abuse as a child, where the district court stated “I am going to exercise my discretion not to depart farther based on diminished capacity or any other departure, even if recognized by the guidelines.” United States v. Davoudi 172 F.3d 1130, 1133 (9th Cir.1999) (discretionary refusal to depart is unreviewable).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     