
    Argued December 18, 1975; reargued March 23,
    affirmed August 9, 1976
    JUDSON et al, Appellants, v. CITY OF LINCOLN CITY et al, Respondents.
    
    (No. 34104, CA 4570)
    552 P2d 588
    
      Scott McArthur, Monmouth, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were McArthur & Homer, P.C., Monmouth.
    
      James Kulla, Lincoln City, argued the cause for respondent City of Lincoln City and its officers. On the brief was Michael G. Dowsett, City Attorney, Lincoln City.
    
      Dan W. Poling, Lincoln City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Journeymen, Inc., an Oregon corporation.
    No appearance for respondent Lee Johnson, Attorney General of the State of Oregon.
   Affirmed. Brooks v. Dierker, 275 Or 619, 552 P2d 533 (1976).

FORT, J.

THORNTON, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur for the reasons stated in my specially concurring opinion in Caldwell v. Wunderlich, 26 Or App 407, 552 P2d 1321 (1976).

Lee, J. I join in the opinion of Thornton, J.  