
    Smith & Reilay against Hudson.
    Where the sheriff, upon a Ji. fa. sold 3 Emdf3 but in the¡ certificate mistake!1 omitted to mention parcels^ the^ court ordered hi™certificate! according to the fact.
    The Sheriff of Rensselaer, under a fi. fa. issued in this ’ J f . cause, had sold three parcels of land, belonging to the defendant, to Reilay, one of the plaintiffs, but in the certificate of sale which he had made and filed,, by-mistake, had omitted to mention one of these parcels.
   T/tc Court, on motion, in behalf of Reilay, ordered the Sheriff to amend his certificate, by inserting therein, that he had also sold the parcel omitted,

R.ule accordingly.  