
    (53 App. Div. 384.)
    POWERS v. POWERS.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    July 23, 1900.)
    Divorce Proceedings'—Competency op Son as Witness.
    In an action for separation, the son of the parties is a competent witness.
    Appeal from special term, Kings county.
    Action by Louise T. Powers against James J. Powers. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Reversed.
    Argued before GOODRICH, P. J., and BARTLETT, WOODWARD, HIRSOHBERG, and JERKS, JJ.
    Alexander S. Bacon, for appellant.
    R. McC. Robinson, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

This judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted. The action is for separation, and the defendant upon the trial offered as a witness the oldest son of the parties. The learned trial court refused to permit him to be sworn or to give evidence. Ro legal ground appears for such action; and as the defendant insisted upon his right to have the testimony received as a part of the case, and excepted to the court’s refusal to grant such right, the error is one which requires reversal of the judgment.  