
    Terron WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 85229.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Jan. 10, 2006.
    S. Kristina Starke, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J„ and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Terrón Williams, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by giving him erroneous advice regarding when he would be eligible for parole.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).  