
    SMITH v. STATE.
    (No. 3473.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 17, 1915.)
    Ceiminal Law <©=>1097 — Appeal — Statement of Facts.
    In the • absence of a statement of facts, grounds in a motion for new trial that the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence cannot be considered.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dee. Dig. <©=> 1097.]
    Appeal from Dallas County Court, at Law; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge.
    Edna Smith was convicted of keeping a disorderly house, and she appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Q. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of keeping a disorderly house, and her punishment assessed at a fine of $200 and 20 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The only grounds in the motion allege: (1) The verdict is contrary to the law; (2) the

verdict is contrary to the evidence. As no statement of facts accompanies the record, such grounds cannot be considered.

The judgment ,is affirmed.  