
    BRAMSON v. BOGRAND.
    
      Supreme Court—Dismissals—No constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 18077
    Decided November 20, 1923.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.
    
      Messrs. Klein & Harris and Mr. T. 8. Dunlap, for plaintiff in error.'
    
      Messrs. Woods, Lang é Eastman, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that the said petition in error he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reasons no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamakes, Robinson, Jones, Matthias,"Day and AnnEfi, J'J., concur.  