
    Christine Reitan vs. Eliza Goebel and others.
    May 1, 1889.
    Action on Appeal Bond. — Evidence held sufficient to support the verdict.
    Action brought in the district court for Clay county on a supersedeas bond given by defendant Goebel on an appeal to this court from an order refusing a new trial in the suit of Beitan v. Goebel, the other defendants being the sureties. A former appeal is reported, 35 Minn. 384. Upon the trial, before Baxter, J., plaintiff had a verdict. . Defendants appeal from an order refusing a new trial.
    
      Burnham é Tillotson, for appellants.
    
      0. Mosness, for respondent.
   By the Court.

The only question presented upon this appeal is as to whether the evidence justified the determination of the jury that, at the time of the execution of the. bond upon which this action is brought, the defendant Goebel had property which might have been seized and appropriated to the satisfaction of a judgment which the plaintiff had recovered against her. An examination of the record satisfies ns that the evidence was sufficient, and that the order refusing a new trial should be affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.  