
    McCREA, Respondent, v. CLARKE, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June, 1901.)
    Action by Augustus L. McCrea against Peete B. Clarke.
    Holt & Duross, for appellant. E. S.-Hull, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

It appears by the testimony that the plaintiff’s assignor fulfilled all his obligations under the written contract, while the defendant defaulted under his obligation to dispose of the $500 of stock for the personal benefit of the plaintiff’s assignor. It is difficult to imagine how the learned court below could have reached a different conclusion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.  