
    13390.
    Tutt v. The State.
    Decided May 9, 1922.
    Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Lincoln superior court — Judge Shurley. January 23, 1922.
    
      R. W. Ware, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While the evidence against the accused was weak, this court cannot say that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence, and, as the finding of the jury has been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  