
    In re: James Claude BAILEY, Petitioner.
    No. 05-7436.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 20, 2005.
    Decided: Oct. 31, 2005.
    James Claude Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

James Claude Bailey petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted, and we therefore deny the petition. We grant Bailey leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his “motion for expedited response” as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED  