
    Michael J. BUCKLEY and Daniel Buckley, infants, etc., respondents, v. Loretta BUCKLEY et al., respondents; Alois J. Hofacker, appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 25, 1916.)
   Motion for resettlement of order granted. The proper expenses of the purchaser in examining the title should be charged against the interest of the infant plaintiffs in the subject-matter of the action.  