
    JOHNSON v. ROBERTS et al.
    No. 16390
    Opinion Filed Sept. 15, 1925.
    (Syllaibus.)
    Appeal and Error — Parties — Unnecessary Parties — Dismissal as to Garnishees.
    Where judgment has been rendered against garnishees and there is no question as to the correctness of the judgment, and they have paid the same into court, and have been discharged, and there remains only the question to be determined who is the proper party to receive the money, the garnishees are not necessary parties, and the appeal will be dismissed as to them.
    Note. — See under (1) 3 C. J. p. 1015, § 970.
    Error from District Court, Atoka County; J. H. Linebaugh, Judge.
    Action between Mary J. Johnson and Palo A. Roberts et al. Prom the judgment, the former brings! error.
    Dismissed.
    Utterhack & Stinson, for plaintiff in error.
    J. G. Ralls, for defendants in error.
    Gordon Pryer, for Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company.
    Rittenhouse & Rittenhouse, for Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Palo A. Roberts and James Hudspeth sued plaintiff in error, Mary J. Johnson, in the district court of Atoka county, and garnished the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error and the garnishees. The garnishees paid the judgment into court and were discharged, and they now move the dismissal «f the appeal.. The garnishees having lully discharged their obligation, the only questn n that remains to be determined is the question of who is entitled to receive the money, a matter in which they have no concern. We cannot see wherein they are necessary parties to the appeal, and the same is dismissed as to them.  