
    Born v. King.
    [No. 10,040.
    Filed October 10, 1919.]
    
      Appeal. — Review.—Verdict.—Conclusweness.—Conflicting Evidence. —A judgment based on conflicting evidence is conclusive on appeal.
    Prom Marion Superior Court (104,511); John J. Bochford, Judge.
    Action between Isaac Born and J. R. King. Prom, a judgment for the latter, the former appeals.’
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Bitchey & Cronh, for appellant.
    
      Bomney L. Willson and Bussell Willson, for appellee.
   Remy, J.

— The only questions which, under the rules of this court, are presented for our consideration, and which have not been waived by appellant, require’for their determination a review of conflict^ ing evidence. Under such circumstances, the judgment of the trial court is conclusive, and on the authority of Nicholson v. Smith (1916), 60 Ind. App. 385, 110 N. E. 1007, the judgment is affirmed.  