
    PARISH v. CRAIG.
    This case is jrovornod by the decisions in the eases of Parish v. Craig, 40 .App. X). C. 338; and Craig v. Parish, 43 App. D. C. 447.
    No. 3022.
    Submitted October 5, 1917.
    Decided November 12, 1917.
    
    Hearing oh an appeal liv the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the 'District of Columbia, on verdict, in an action on a contract to pay a percentage of the gross amount recovered on a claim against the United States.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    The facts are stated in the opinion.
    
      Mr. Leigh Robinson for the appellant.
    dir. Chauncey Hackeli and Mr. Frank W. Hackell for the appellee.
   Per Curiam :

This cause has heen before this court in two former appeals, — Parish v. Craig, 40 App. D. C. 138; Craig v. Parish. 43 App. D. C. 447. There have heen three separate trials, resulting, in each instance, in a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount claimed. In our former opinions the facts were fully stated and the law of the case reviewed. This appeal presents no important additional ’impositions of law or fact.

The judgment, therefore, is affirmed, with costs.

A ffirmed.

A motion for a rehearing and reargument was denied December 1, 3 917.

A petition for tbe allowance of an appeal to the Supreme .Court of the United States was denied January 12, 1918.  