
    Shellie T. STRATTON, Petitioner, v. TIDEWATER AUCHTER COMPANY, George D. Auchter Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 33367.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 9, 1964.
    Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, and Bette Towers Miller, Jacksonville, for petitioner.
    Harry T. Gray, George Stelljes, Jr., and Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for Tidewater Auchter Co., Barnes & Slater, Jacksonville, for George D. Auchter Co., Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. '  