
    [905 NYS2d 613]
    In the Matter of Ronald E. Stoute (Admitted as Ronald Eton Stoute), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, Petitioner.
    Second Department,
    June 8, 2010
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Diana Maxfield, Kearse, Brooklyn, for petitioner.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) served the respondent with a petition dated October 2, 2008 containing one charge of professional misconduct. After a preliminary conference on March 19, 2009 and April 22, 2009, and a hearing on May 13, 2009 and June 10, 2009, the Special Referee sustained the charge. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report and to impose such discipline as the Court deems just and proper. The respondent has neither cross-moved nor submitted any papers in response to the Grievance Committee’s motion.

Charge one alleges that the respondent converted funds entrusted to him as a fiduciary, in connection with the practice of law, in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (a) (4) and DR 9-102 (a) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4]; 1200.46 [a]).

In or about March 2004, the respondent represented I.O. Njoku in the sale of real property at 665 St. Nicholas Avenue. Pursuant to the contract, the respondent deposited the $100,000 down payment into his IOLA account, entitled “IOLA-Ronald E. Stoute PC,” at Chase Bank on March 4, 2004. A dispute between the respondent’s client and the purchaser resulted in a litigation. Louis A. Craco, Jr., represented the respondent’s client in the litigation, during which the respondent continued to hold the down payment.

In or about March 2007, the respondent refused demands by Mr. Craco and the purchasers’s attorney to transfer the funds to Mr. Craco’s escrow account. On or about March 28, 2007, prior to the final settlement of the litigation, the respondent withdrew $65,000 of the down payment and paid his business and/or personal expenses from those funds. This caused the balance in the respondent’s IOLA account to fall to $50,524 on March 30, 2007. The respondent did not have the permission of his client or the purchaser to withdraw any portion of the down payment from his IOLA account.

Based on the evidence adduced, the Special Referee properly sustained the charge, and the Grievance Committee’s motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report is granted.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to impose, the Grievance Committee notes that the respondent has no prior disciplinary history. Unauthorized withdrawals of escrow funds to satisfy claimed legal fees have consistently been sanctioned by this Court (see Matter of Dash, 64 AD3d 242 [2009]; Matter of Shuster, 33 AD3d 257 [2006]).

It was clearly improper to withdraw legal fees from escrow without attempting to execute a lien and without authorization. In view of the respondent’s previously unblemished record and the isolated nature of his misconduct, effectively immediately, he is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years.

Prudenti, RJ., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the motion of the Grievance Committee to confirm the Special Referee’s report is granted; and it. is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Ronald E. Stoute, admitted as Ronald Eton Stoute, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years commencing July 8, 2010 and continuing until further order of this Court, with leave to apply for reinstatement no sooner than six months prior to the expiration of the said period of two years, upon furnishing satisfactory proof that during said period he (1) refrained from practicing or attempting to practice law, (2) fully complied with this order and with the terms and provisions of the written rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10), (3) complied with the applicable continuing legal education requirements of 22 NYCRR 691.11 (c) (2), and (4) otherwise properly conducted himself; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, during the period of suspension and until the further order of this Court, the respondent, Ronald E. Stoute, admitted as Ronald Eton Stoute, shall desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Ronald E. Stoute, admitted as Ronald Eton Stoute, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (f).  