
    MULINOS v. WALKOF et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
    January 14, 1916.)
    Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term.
    Action by Constantino Mulinos against Harry Walkof, impleaded with others. From an order directing the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint, separately stating and numbering the causes of action, or to elect on which cause of action he will proceed, he appeals. Order reversed, and motion to make the complaint more definite denied.
    Argued January term, 1916, before CUY, BTJUR, and GAVEGAN, JJ.
    Herman Kahn, of New York City, for appellant,
    I-Iarry M. Peyser, of New York City, for respondents.
   GAVEGAN, J.

For the reasons stated in the case of Gerald Mulinos v. Walkof, 156 N. Y. Supp. 1032, decided herewith, the order appealed from must be reversed, with 810 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with §10 costs. All concur.  