
    Charles Smith et al., Resp’t, v. Hamilton A. Roblee et al., App’lts.
    
      C. O. Lester & James W. Lester, for app’lts ; A. W. Sheperd, for resp’ts; Smith & Hickey; Jesse Stiles, for resp'ts Hammond et al.
    
   Mayham, P. J.

On a careful examination of the facts and questions of law raised by the appellants in this case, I think that the judgment should be affirmed, and that a written opinion is not required. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.  