
    North Rome v. Hall.
    Argued April 25,—
    Decided May 12, 1900.
    Action for damages. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. August 26, 1899.
    
      Reece & Denny and R. P. Treadaway, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. S. McHenry, contra.
   Lewis, J.

There being no error of law committed, and the testimony being sufficient to sustain the verdict, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial. The writ of error, being palpably without merit, must have been sued out for delay only, and damages are accordingly awarded.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

All concurring, except Fish, J., absent.  