
    Alonzo REED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Scott M. KERNAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 05-16922.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 13, 2007 .
    Filed Feb. 15, 2007.
    Alonzo Reed, Represa, CA, pro se.
    Steve M. Defilippis, Esq., Picone & Defilippis, San Jose, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Pamela B. Hooley, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and COVELLO , Senior Judge.
    
      
       Scott M. Kernan is substituted for his predecessor as Warden. See Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
    
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. F. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Alfred V. Covello, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Alonzo Reed (Reed) challenges the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which Reed sought restoration of good time credits he claims were wrongly reduced following a prison disciplinary proceeding.

The evidence before the district court conclusively demonstrated that any restoration of Reed’s credits would have no impact on his release date or his parole period. Reed’s other proffered injuries are insufficient collateral consequences to generate a case or controversy. See Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 858 (9th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       ■pjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     