
    Bleakley v. Sullivan et al.
    
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, Second Depa/rtment.
    
    May 9, 1892.)
    Motion by defendant Sullivan for reargument, or for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.
    Motion denied.
    For decision on appeal by defendants, see 16 H. Y. Supp. 685.
    Argued before Barnard, P. J„ and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.
    
      Cyrus Win. Horton, (Galvin Frost and Franklin Couch, of counsel,) for appellant Sullivan. David W. Travis, for respondent.
   Pratt, J.

The moving affidavits do not point out any statute or controlling decision that has been overlooked. We are still of the opinion that the judgment was properly affirmed. Motion for reargument denied. Motion to be allowed to appeal to the court of appeals denied. Ho costs of motion.  