
    BUNDICK, Respondent, v. STRAUSS, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 14, 1900.)
    Action by William II. Bundick against Julius H. Strauss.
   No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except BARTLETT, J., who dissents on the ground that the plaintiff’s own testimony indicates that he did not regard the defendant’s treatment as a discharge.  