
    Israel Toplan et al., complainants, v. Robert F. Hoover et al., defendants.
    [Decided December 30th, 1926.]
    To be a bona fide purchaser of lands without notice, the' purchaser must not only have agreed to purchase, but he must also have actually paid the purchase-money and taken his deed without notice.
    On bill for injunction. On final hearing.
    
      Messrs. Cole & Cole, for the complainants.
    
      Messrs. Bourgeois & Coulomb, for the defendants.
   Ingersoll, V. C.

On September 22d, 1921, George R. Beck and Robert E. Hoover rented of one Rettie M. Goff, a lot of land fronting on the boardwalk in Wildwood. No building was upon this land. It was agreed between them that the premises should not be used for any other purpose than for the business commonly known as “The Automatic Baseball Game,” and the party of the second part agreed to erect at (his) own expense a building suitable, &c.

Although it was agreed between the parties to the lease that the building could oe removed at the expiration of the lease, this clause was inadvertently not included in the lease.

Through mesne conveyances the fee of the property is now in the complainant, who, upon being advised that the lessee would remove the building at the expiration of the lease, filed this bill and obtained the preliminary restraint.

The complainant contends he is a bond fide purchaser for value, without notice of defendants’ claim or right. It is admitted that he had notice thereof at the time of the settler ment for the purchase of the property and before it had been conveyed to him.

To be a bona fide purchaser without notice the purchaser must not only have agreed to purchase without notice, but he must also have actually paid the purchase-money and taken his deed without such notice. Brinton v. Scull, 55 N. J. Eq. 747; Dean v. Anderson, 34 N. J. Eq. 496.

I will advise the dismissal of the bill.  