
    CANTON v. ATLANTIC FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CO.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
    June 17, 1913.)
    Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term, Action by William T. Canton against the Atlantic Fruit & ■ Steamship Company. From an order denying a motion for a bill of particulars, defendant appeals. Modified and affirmed, Ralph James M. Bullowa, of New York City, for appellant. Alexander Marks, for respondent
   BIJUR, J.

The defendant is entitled to the particulare as to whether the agreement was oral or written, and all the terms thereof; _ He is also entitled to know the particulars of plaintiff’s claim of special damage, namely, that he “has been prevented from attending to his business as merchant. These are items A and I in the no-ti.ee of motion for the bill. The order should be modified, by adding those to the items allowed, and, as so modified, affirmed, with disbursements to appellant.  