
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Octavio BAUTISTA-OSUNA, a/k/a John Doe, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 00-50704.
    D.C. No. CR-99-01062-ABC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 11, 2002.
    
    Decided March 19, 2002.
    Before CANBY, BEEZER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Octavio Bautista-Osuna appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Osuna’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issue suitable for appeal. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     