
    17006.
    Sorrow v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 17 O. J. p. 271, n. 41.
    Decided March 3, 1926.
   Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial is based upon the usual general grounds only; the verdict is authorized by the evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Conviction of manufacture of liquor; from Madison superior court—Judge W. L. Hodges. October 28, 1925.

Berry T. Moseley, for plaintiff in error.

A. S. Slcelton, solicitor-general, contra.  