
    No. 884
    STATE v. KILDUFF
    No. 20000.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. July 21, 1926;
    4 Abs. 510.
    681. JURISDICTION — May the Municipal Court of the city of Cleveland try an accused for a violation of 13062 GC. when the forbidden act is committed out of the corporate limits of the city?
    Attorneys — Carl F. Schuler for State; Maurice Bernon for Kilduff; both of Cleveland.
   Thomas Kilduff was accused of selling pools in violation of 13062 GC., the violation being alleged to have been committed without limits of the city of Cleveland.

The judgment of the Municipal Court in sustaining a motion to quash was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

The State in the Supreme Court contends that the Municipal Court of the city of Cleveland has jurisdiction of the case under 1579-12 GC.  