
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Adalid CASTELLANOS-MARTINEZ, Defendant — Appellant.
    No. 03-10547.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 12, 2004.
    
    Decided July 20, 2004.
    Michael T. Morrissey, Esq., USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Alex Gonzalez, Gonzalez & Smith, Mesa, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HAWKINS, THOMAS and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Adalid Castellanos-Martinez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 55-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), enhanced by (b)(2).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Castellanos-Martinez has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. CastellanosMartinez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government has not filed a brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     