
    Charles BALL, by Diana MANCINO, Respondent, v. PEAR ONE, INC./Craig REBERS, and Uninsured, Relator, and Special Compensation Fund.
    No. A06-1980.
    Supreme Court of Minnesota.
    Jan. 24, 2007.
    Joseph J. Dudley, Jr., Dudley and Smith, St. Paul, MN, for Relator.
    Lorelie M. Hoyer, St. Paul, MN, for Special Compensation Fund.
    Todd J. Thun, Bassford Remele, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents.
   ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 18, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). We further conclude that relator has not overcome the presumption that Minn.Stat. § 176.183 (2004) is constitutional.

Respondent is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Associate Justice  