
    STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Chuck ADDERLY, Appellee.
    No. 91-1295.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 1, 1992.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR REQUEST TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing, but grant his motion to certify a question of great public importance. Accordingly, as this court did in State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), we certify the following question to be of great public importance:

MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?

DELL, GARRETT and FARMER, JJ., concur.  