
    Reuben Mattison, plaintiff in error, vs. Daniel Baucus, defendant in error.
    
      —Judgment affirmed.
    
    T. C. Ripley, for plaintiff in error;
    J. Pierson, for defendant in error.
   This was a question as to the interest of a mortgagor in personal property. That his interest, even before forfeiture, where he has not the right of possession for a definite period, is not the subject of levy and sale upon execution. (Reported, 1 Comstock 295.)  