
    Matter of the Application of Frederick Riccardo to Have Letters of Administration on the Estate of Pietro Riccardo, Deceased, Issued to Germano P. Baccelli, Revoked.
    (Surrogate’s Court, Herkimer County,
    February, 1913.)
    Executors and administrators — prior right of Italian consul to administer estate of decedent — bond must be given by consul.
    Where an Italian subject died in this state in 1912, leaving him surviving only his father and mother, both residents of Italy, the Italian consul under the provision of the treaty between the United States and Italy has a prior right to administer the estate of decedent.
    There being no personal estate other than a claim for causing the wrongful death of decedent, the said consul must give a bond in the sum of $500, there being a claim against the estate of $206.40.
    Application for the revocation of letters of administration.
    Timothy Curtin, for petitioner.
    Countryman, ¡Nellis, DuBois & McDermott, for Italian Consul, opposed.
   Bell, S.

Pietro Eiccardo, a subject of the kingdom of Italy, died intestate on September 29, 1912, in Herkimer county, ¡N. Y., where he resided, leaving him surviving his father, Guiseppe Eiccardo, his sole heir at law and next of kin and his mother, both residing in Italy.

He also left said Frederick Riccardo, an uncle and a creditor of deceased, residing in the state of Hew York.

Letters of administration were granted by the surrogate of Herkimer county on October 31, 1912, to Germano P. Baccelli, consul of the kingdom and government of Italy for that portion of the state of Hew York which includes the county of Herkimer, without citation having been served on said Frederick Riccardo, or any other person and without giving a bond.

Frederick Riccardo claims that he is entitled to letters of administration upon the estate of said deceased and that the letters heretofore granted to said Germano P. Baccelli, the Italian consul, should be revoked.

The petitioner, who is a creditor of decedent, is entitled to letters of administration on the estate of the decedent, unless the Italian consul has a prior right, under the provisions of the treaty between the United States and Italy.

“All treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” U. S. Const., art. VI, § 2.

Every treaty made by the authority of the United States is superior to the Constitution and laws of any individual state and if the Constitution or law of a state is contrary to a treaty, it must give way to the treaty. Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 U. S. 483.

The treaty of May 8, 1878, between the United States and Italy (20 Stat. 725), articles 16 and 17, provides:

“Article XVI. In case of the death of a citizen of the United States in Italy, or of an Italian citizen in the United States, 'who has no known heir or testamentary executor designated by him, the competent local authorities shall give notice of the fact to the Consuls or Consular Agents of the nation to which the deceased belongs, to the end that the information may be at once transmitted to the parties interested.

“Article XVII. The respective Consuls General, Consuls, Vice-Consuls and Consular Agents, as likewise the Consular Chancellors, Secretaries, Clerks or Attachés, shall enjoy in both countries, all the rights, prerogatives, immunities and privileges which are or may hereafter be granted to the officers of the same grade, of the most favored nation.”

The convention between the United States and Sweden proclaimed March 20, 1911, provided:

“Article XIV. In the event of any citizen of either of the two contracting parties dying without will or testament, in the territory of the other contracting party, the consul general, consul or vice-consul of the nation to which the deceased may belong, or, in his absence, the representative of such consul general, consul or vice-consul, shall, so far as the laws of each country will permit, and pending the appointment of an administrator and until Letters of Administration have been granted, take charge of the property left by the deceased, for the benefit of his lawful heirs, and creditors, and, moreover, have the right to be appointed as Administrator of such estate.”

In Rocca v. Thompson, 223, U. S. 317, the court, in construing the provisions of the Argentine treaty in connection with the Italian treaty in reference to administration to an Italian consul, said: “ Had it been the intention to commit the administration of estates of citizens of one country, dying in another, exclusively to the consul of the foreign nation, it would have been very easy to have declared that purpose in unmistakable terms.

“ For instance, where that was the purpose, as in the treaty made with Peru in 1887, it was declared in article 33, as follows: ‘ Until the conclusion of a consular convention, which the high contracting parties agrée to form as soon as may be mutually convenient, it is stipulated that, in the absence of the legal heirs or representatives, the consuls or vice consuls of either party shall be ex-officio the executors or administrators of the citizens of their nation who may die within their consular jurisdictions, and of their countrymen dying at sea whose property may be brought within their district-.’. And in the convention between the United States and Sweden, proclaimed March 20, 1911, it is provided,” quoting as above stated.

I am of the opinion and conclude that under the most favored nation ” clause of the Italian treaty and that part of the treaty between the United States and Sweden which provides, “ and moreover, have the right to be appointed as administrator of such estate” and the decisions (Matter of Baglieri’s Estate, 137 N. Y. Supp. 175; Matter of Jarema’s Estate, 137 id. 176; Matter of Lombardi, 78 Misc. Rep. 689. Matter of Gurrieri Orphans Court, Essex Co. N. J., opinion filed June 20, 1912) the Italian consul has the prior right to administer on this estate.

An order will he signed denying the prayer of the petitioner herein.

There being no personal estate hut a claim for the death of decedent, and the petitioner having a claim for $206.40,. said Germano P. Baccelli should file a bond in the sum of $500.

Decreed accordingly.  