
    Dawes & Baker v. Corcoran.
    Leading questions may be asked in cross-examining a witness.
    Assumpsit. Mr. Mason, for the defendant, in cross-examining the plaintiffs’ witness, asked whether there was not an agreement that, &e. (stating certain terms.)
    
      Mr. Keay, for the plaintiff,
    objected on the ground of its being a leading question.
   The objection was overruled, and the question permitted to be asked.

Mr. Key took a bill of exceptions. But no writ of error was issued. See Peake’s L. E. 135.  