
    Matter of the Estate of Mary Lewis, Deceased.
    (Surrogate’s Court, New York County,
    October, 1908.)
    Taxes — Inheritance and transfer taxes — Property and interest subject to tax — Estate by appointment by will pursuant to will of remoter ancestor.
    Where the will of decedent’s father provided that upon her death his executors should transfer the share held in trust for her to her issue as she should by will appoint, and, in case of failure to make such appointment, then to such issue absolutely, and she by will exercised the power, the beneficiaries derive their title to the property through the exercise of the power of appointment by decedent, and such property should be included in the taxable assets of her estate.
    Where, by reason of the filing with the appraiser by the children of an instrument in writing by which they elected to take the property under the will of their grandfather, instead of under the appointment exercised by their mother, such property was not included in the taxable assets of her estate, the matter will be remitted to the appraiser for correction.
    Appeal "by the State Comptroller from an. order fixing the tax.
    John S. Jenkins (Henry W. Tifft, of counsel), for Comptroller.
    William T. Sabin, for Strachan Hune.
   Beckett, S.

This is an appeal by the State Comptroller from an order fixing tax, upon the ground that the appraiser erred in refusing- to include in the taxable assets of the estate certain property over which the decedent -had a power of appointment. That part of the will of decedent’s father conferring upon her the power of appointment reads as follows: “Fourthly. That upon the death of my children, and as they severally die, that my executors and trustees convey, pay and assign to the issue of such child the part or share held in trust for him or her in such proportions and at such time or times as he or she shall direct and appoint in and by his or her last will and testament, and in case of failure to make such appointment, then to such issue absolutely.” The decedent, by appropriate phraseology in her will, exercised the power in favor of her children. The latter filed with the appraiser an instrument in writing by which they elect to take the property under the will of their grandfather, the donor of the power, instead of under the appointment exercised by their mother, the decedent herein. The donor of the power having provided that the corpus of the estate should, upon the death of the donee of the power, be paid to such persons and in such proportions as she by her last will and testament should appoint, and the donee having by virtue of this power appointed the persons to whom the property should be paid, these beneficiaries derive their title to the property through the exercise of the power of appointment by decedent and not directly from the donor of the power. It was only upon the failure of the donee of the power to appoint that they could have taken under the will of the donor. In Matter of Lansing, 182 N. Y. 238, Vann, J., commenting on the Cooksey case, said, respecting the donor’s will in that case: Moreover, title to the remainder was to vest in them only upon the failure of the mother to appoint.” Matter of Cooksey, 182 N. Y. 92; Matter of Haggerty, Surr. Decs., Thomas, S., 1908, 304. The order fixing tax should be reversed and the report remitted to the appraiser for correction.

Order reversed and report remitted to appraiser for correction.  