
    Antonio Lenard MIKELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-3402.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 1, 1997.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gonzalo Alberto Gayoso, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before COPE, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction. Based on the record before the trial court, we hold that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to suppress. See Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 984 (Fla.1997); Savage v. State, 588 So.2d 975 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 943, 112 S.Ct. 1493, 117 L.Ed.2d 634 (1992); McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978). The “trial court’s decision was based on competent substantial evi-denee.” Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 988, 992-93 (Fla.1997).

Affirmed.  