
    SHARROW against COOL.
    ON OEETIOEAEI.
    The action below was brought on the following state of demand:—
    [310] Michael Sherrow, Dr. To cash paid to Frederick Limebeck, on an old execution, for neglect of duty.
    The insufficiency of the state of demand, was assigned as a reason of reversal.
   Kirkpatrick, C. J.

I think the judgment must be reversed. The state of demand contains no cause of action; whatever right the plaintiff may have, he has exhibited none in this statement.

The other justices concurred.

Judgment reversed.

Anderson, att’y for plaintiff.  