
    Rodrick BURTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 61765.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 16, 1993.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 17, 1993.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 20, 1993.
    David C. Hemingway, Office of the Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appel-lant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Runzi, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  