
    HUGHES, Respondent, v. MARTIN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court. Appellate Term.
    June, 1901.)
    Action by Albert Hughes against Charles Martin.
    S. G. Derrickson, for appellant. Jeroloman & Arrowsmith, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The indisputable evidence showed that defendant, under an assumed name, employed the plaintiff as a broker in realty to perform services for him. Those services were rendered, and the defendant failed to pay the regular commission. We think the judgment ■awarded for such commission is correct. Judgment affirmed, with costs.  