
    WRIGHT v. STATE.
    (No. 4040.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 12, 1916.)
    Criminal Law <⅜=1114 (3) — Appeal — Review.
    Where no statement of facts accompanies the record on appeal, the only ground presented in the motion fox a new trial which is reviewable is that going to the sufficiency of the indictment.
    [Ed. Note — For other eases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2921; Dec. Dig. <§=51114(3).]
    Appeal from District Court, Grayson County; M. H. Garnett, Judge.
    Clabe Wright was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. Consequently the only ground presented in the motion for a new trial we can consider is the one attacking the sufficiency of the indictment. The indictment charges robbery under our statute, and the court did not err in overruling the motion to quash it.

The judgment is affirmed.  