
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario SORCIA-QUINTANA, aka, Mario Socia Quintana, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10575.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 13, 2009.
    
    Filed Jan. 23, 2009.
    Aaron Wegner, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    Rosemary Marquez, Esq., Montoya & Marquez, PLLC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mario Sorcia-Quintana appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sorcia-Quintana contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider and address arguments made by defense counsel at sentencing. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Catty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     