
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MONTES-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Sergio Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-10684.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 25, 2014.
    
    Filed June 27, 2014.
    Lynnette Carleen Kimmins, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Matthew J. McGuire, Patagonia, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Sergio Montes-Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Montes-Ramirez contends that the district court procedurally erred by basing his sentence on the clearly erroneous factual determination that his prior conviction was a sexual offense. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.2010), and find none. The record reflects that the court expressly declined to characterize Montes-Ramirez’s prior crime as a sexual offense and imposed the sentence on the basis of Montes-Ramirez’s criminal and immigration history.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
     