
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Seung KIM, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-50326.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted June 29, 2010.
    
    Filed July 21, 2010.
    Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Brent G. Tabacchi, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jeffrey Seung Kim, Garden Grove, CA, pro se.
    Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant>-Appellant.
    Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jeffrey Seung Kim appeals from the district court’s order revoking supervised release and imposing a sentence that included the added supervised release condition that he participate in a Residential Reentry Center for a period of six months. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Kim’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Kim the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     