
    Elexis SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 77201.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 26, 2000.
    Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., CRAHAN, J., DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elexis Smith (Movant) appeals the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).  