
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kurt Shawn HANEIPH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-7524.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 20, 2008.
    Decided: Dec. 1, 2008.
    Kurt Shawn Haneiph, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Kurt Haneiph appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Haneiph, No. l:96-cr-00227CMH-1 (E.D.Va. filed July 14, entered July 15, 2008).

We grant Haneiph’s motion to file a supplemental appendix. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  