
    PAUL GERLI, TRADING, &c., DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. NATIONAL MILL SUPPLY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 11, 1910
    Decided November 14, 1910.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 49 Vroom 1.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Wayne Dumont.
    
    Eor the defendant in error, Dayton E. Horton.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chawcelloe, Gaeeison, Teenchaed, Beegen, Vooehees, Mintuen, Bogeet, Veedenbuegh, Veoom, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.  