
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. R.K., Juvenile, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-10383.
    D.C. No. CR-00-00277-1-SOM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 12, 2004.
    
    Decided April 15, 2004.
    
      Omer G. Poirier, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

R.K., a juvenile, appeals his appeals his 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation of probation. He originally pleaded guilty to destruction of federal property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(f)(1) and (i). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), R.K’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     