
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lino Isaac CARRILLO-HERNANDEZ, also known as Lino Carrillo-Hernandez, also known as Lino Carillo-Hernandez, also known as Lino Isaac Carrillo, also known as Lino Isaac Hernandez Carrillo, also known as Lino Carrillo Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-20731 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 12/20/2016
    Andrew R. Gould, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the judgment in a criminal ease, Lino Isaac Carrillo-Hernandez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which defines a crime of violence when incorporated by reference into U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of Johnson v. United States, — U.S.—, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). Id. at 672. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has ■ determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     