
    Maudo L. FOFANA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael D. MELENDEZ, Officer in Charge, Bice; et al., Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 06-35622.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 16, 2007.
    Filed April 18, 2007.
    Maudo L. Fofana, Tacoma, WA, pro se.
    
      Priscilla T. Chan, USSE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondents-Appellees.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See 
        Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Maudo L. Fofana appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, challenging his immigration detention.

The October 12, 2006, and October 30, 2006, requests for judicial notice are granted. Appellees contend that this appeal is moot because Fofana is now being detained pursuant to a final order of removal. We agree that, in light of the final order of removal, there is no longer any live controversy regarding the challenged detention. See Foster v. Carson, 347 F.3d 742, 745-46 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     