
    Anthony CHAKUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 88328.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 9, 2007.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 19, 2007.
    
      Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony R. Chakur (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the trial court clearly erred in denying his request for relief because he was not informed that his conviction would require him to register as a sex offender. He also claims he pleaded guilty based upon a mistaken belief regarding his sentence. Finally, movant attacks the constitutionality of the statute which requires him to register as a sex offender.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).  