
    Ex parte LAWRENCE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    May 17, 1911.)
    Habeas Cobpus (§ 113)—Appeal—Discus-sion op Evidence.
    The evidence will not be discussed on appeal, where one under indictment for murder applied for habeas corpus and after hearing was remanded without bail.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Habeas Corpus, Cent. Dig. § 114; Dec. Dig. § 113.]
    Appeal from District Court, Matagorda County; Wells Thompson, Judge.
    W. W. Lawrence applied for habeas corpus, was remanded .without bail, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    W. M. Holland, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   PRENDERGAST, J.

The relator was in-dieted for murder. He applied for and secured a hearing on a second application for a habeas corpus. The district judge heaa-d the case and all the evidence, which we have carefully gone over and considered. In such eases we never discuss the evidence. It is our opinion that no error is shown by the district judge remanding the relator without bail.

We therefore affirm the judgment of the ■district court.  