
    Eddie CARGILE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D06-2455.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Sept. 29, 2006.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 2006.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to whatever right Mr. Cargile may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. See Hitchcock v. State, 866 So.2d 23 (Fla.2004).

CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.  