
    SHONBERG v. GREEN et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 5, 1908.)
    Evidence—Secondary Evidence—Copy op Agreement.
    A paper, which witness testifies is a copy oí the agreement which he has in his possession, is not admissible, not being the best evidence.
    [Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 20, Evidence, §§ 561-567.]
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.
    Action by Isaac Shonberg against Hans U. Green and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
    Reversed.
    Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., and DAYTON and GERARD, JJ. • ■
    Boudin & Eiebman, for appellants.
    Henry W. Fried, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

On the' trial of this action a paper was handed to a witness by plaintiff’s counsel. Witness answered that he had seen the paper before; that it was a copy of the original which he had in. his possession in his office. He stated that he read part of it over and was absolutely positive that it was a copy of the agreement which he had in his possession. Over defendants’ objection that this alleged copy was not the best evidence, it was admitted in evidence. Without an examination of the other errors assigned, this is alone sufficient to call for a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.  