
    25066.
    Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. et al. v. Parrish.
    Decided April 30, 1936.
    W. R. Flournoy, for plaintiff in error. Love & Fort, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

This was a claim for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the award of the director hearing the ease, and the judge of the superior court did not err in aflirming the award.

Judgment affirmed.

Haelntyre and Querry, JJ., conewr.  