
    20909.
    Smith v. Becker Roofing Company.
    Decided April 20, 1931.
    
      8. H. Dyer, for plaintiff,in error. Hall & Jones, contra.
   Bell, J.

In this suit for the purchase-price of certain roofing, in which the defendant pleaded total failure of consideration, the evidence authorized a finding that the consideration had only partially failed, and the verdict for the plaintiff, in a materially reduced amount, was supported by the evidence. No error of law being complained of, the court did not err in refusing the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

JenMns, P. J., cund Stephens, J., concur.  