
    Morris Alpern et al., Appellants, v. Samuel Hirsch et al., Respondents.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term,
    November, 1907.)
    Municipal Courts — Review — Decision — When reversal will be ordered — XTnintelligibility of record.
    Where the record on appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York is so unintelligible that the appellate court cannot say that the judgment .is consistent with any „ aspect of the evidence, a new trial will be granted.
    Appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment in their favor rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan,
    Marcuson Brothers, attorneys for appellants.
    Joseph Wilkenfeld, attorney for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The record is so unintelligible that we cannot say that the judgment rendered is consistent with any aspect of the evidence. The rights of the parties cannot satisfactorily be determined without a new trial.

Present: Gildersleeve, Leventritt and Erlanger, JJ,

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.  