
    Matter of the Petition of James Norton.
    (Supreme Court, Kings Special Term,
    October, 1898)
    Election Law — Certificate of nomination not “ filed ” with the county clerk on time.
    Where the provisions of the Election Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 909, § 59) require that a certificate of nomination “ shall be filed with the clerk of such county ” on October 14th, at the latest, a tender of the certificate to the deputy county clerk at his residence at 11 o’clock on the night of that day, and five hours after the county clerk’s office had closed, is properly refused, and there has been no “ filing ” with the clerk, within the meaning of the statute.
    This was an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the county clerk of Queens County to receive and file as of October 14th, 1898, the certificate of nomination.of the petitioner by the Democratic party as candidate for senator in the second district.
    H. A. Montfort for petitioner.
    E. H. Van Vechten opposed.
   Gaynor J.:

By section 59 of the Election Law the last day for the petitioner to file his certificate of nomination was October 14th. Section 59 says (to use its exact words) that it shall be filed with the clerk of such county ”, i. e., Queens County. The petitioner offered it to the deputy county clerk at his residence at about 11 o’clock on the night of October 14th, but he declined to receive it.on the stated ground that the office of the county clerk, was closed, and that he could; not receive it .at his home. It is contended that as the statute did not in so many words require the certificate to be filed in the office of the clerk, but only with the clerk ”, a delivery of it to the clerk anywhere on October 14th would be a filing of it with the clerk under the statute. By section 165 of the County Law the prescribed hours for the county clerk’s office to be open were from 8 o’clock in the forenoon to 5 o’clock in the afternoon. Under the liberal construction which is given to the Election Law, in aid of the franchise, I was inclined upon the argument to think that the words of the statute, “ shall be filed with the clerk ” of the county, might be construed to mean that the certificate might be delivered to the clerk anywhere. But the difficulty in the way of this interpretation is the word file ”. In order to be “ filed ” with the clerk, a paper must be delivered to him in his office, where the law requires him to keep his books and files, and to receive and file papers. That this is the rule, whether the words of the statute in respect of filing be “ in the office of the clerk,” or “ with the clerk,” is beyond doubt (Hathaway v. Howell, 54 N. Y. 97), and to hold otherwise under the Election Law would only unsettle a thing well understood, and open the door to looseness. It does not seem that any one could think of filing ” a paper on the street, for instance.

The motion is denied.  