
    Riley Martin GOODWIN v. STATE.
    CR-91-1069.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Dec. 30, 1992.
    
      Riley Martin Goodwin, pro se.
    James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Frances Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Riley Martin Goodwin, appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The appellant raised issues in his habeas corpus petition which are cognizable in a petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The trial court treated the writ as a petition for post-conviction relief, without allowing the appellant the opportunity to amend his petition to conform to Rule 32.

“When a post-conviction petition seeking relief from conviction or sentence is filed with the circuit court that is not in the proper form as prescribed by Rule 32, notwithstanding the style of the petition, the court should return the petition to the petitioner to allow him to file the proper form.”

Drayton v. State, 600 So.2d 1088, 1091 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). Strother v. State, 612 So.2d 1359 (Ala.Cr.App.1992); McShan v. State, 608 So.2d 449 (Ala.Cr.App.1992); Smith v. State, 609 So.2d 449 (Ala.Cr.App.1992).

We therefore reverse the judgment of the circuit court denying the appellant’s petition and remand this cause to the circuit court with directions that the petition be returned to the appellant and that the appellant be given the opportunity to amend his petition to comply with Rule 32. Rule 32.6, A.R.Crim.P.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.  