
    STATE v. ELIAS POWELL.
    ''Where, upon an appeal to this court from the judgment of the court below, upon an indictment for murder, no error is assigned, and the court, after a careful examination of the record, is unable to discover any error, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.
    IndiotmeNT, for murder, tried before his Honor, Judge Watts, at June Term, 1875, of the Superior Court of Halifax county.
    The prisoner was indicted‘at Spring Term, 1875, of the «Superior Court of Edgecombe county, and by consent was removed to the Superior Court of Halifax, where it was tried vat June Term, 1875. The prisoner was found guilty of the .murder of one Esadore Cohen as charged in the bill of indict.ment.
    No statement of the case accompanies the record sent to ¡this court upon appeal.
    After the jury had returned their verdict, the prisoner •moved the court for a new trial.. The motion was overruled, •and judgment of death pronounced.
    At the last term of this court a certiorari was issued, upon .motion of the defendant’s counsel, in response to which his Honor, Judge Watts, filed the following statement: “ No objection was taken" by either counsel for the State or the pri-tl soner, to the charge of tbe court; but after the conviction of the prisoner by the jury, his counsel moved the court for a new trial, and stated that he had discovered some new evidence that would explain one of the circumstances relied upon by the State to convict the prisoner with the homicide. It appeared in evidence that a piece of small trace chain was found in th^&ard of the prisoner near his door, after the homic¿djtá@BBn was identified as the property of the deceased, ir the property of his little child.
    'he court overruled the motion, as the evidence was only corroborative of the testimony of two accomplices, and if their testimony was to be believed at all, the circumstance of the chain would in no way effect or alter the main issue.
    
      Moore & Gatling, for the prisoner.
    
      Attorney General Hargrove, for the State.
   RodMAN, J.

We have carefully examined the record in the case, and find no error therein. The counsel who represented the prisoner in this court assigned none.

There is no error. The judgment below is affirmed. Let this opinion be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.  