
    Matilda Pfluger, Appellant, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Respondent.
   Under the proofs in this case, there was an issue for the jury whether warning was or should have been given, and whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.  