
    55896.
    CLARK v. THE STATE.
   Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of burglary. During the sentencing phase the state offered evidence of three previous convictions. Defendant objected to the consideration of two because the offenses to which they related were committed after the offense for which defendant was then being sentenced. The records of thqsp cases all show defendant’s entry of pleas of guilty and sentences prior to the verdict in this case. Held:

Code § 27-2503 (a) (Ga. L. 1974, pp. 352,357) relating to pre-sentence hearings in felony cases, provides in part: ". . .In such hearing the judge shall hear additional evidence in extenuation, mitigation, and aggravation of punishment, including the record of any prior criminal convictions and pleas of guilty or pleas of nolo contendere of the defendant...” (Emphasis supplied.)

Submitted May 22, 1978

Decided June 15, 1978

Rehearing denied July 20, 1978

J. H. Affleck, Jr., for appellant.

Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, B. Thomas Cook, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

We have previously construed this statute adversely to defendant’s contention in Wallace v. State, 134 Ga. App. 708 (7) (215 SE2d 703). The date that the prior offenses were committed does not control. The controlling date is the date of entry of the judgment of conviction and sentence or date of entry of the plea of guilty or of nolo contendere. The evidence here was properly considered.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulmán and Birdsong, JJ., concur.  