
    Robbie R. JONES, Plaintiff, Buck D. Jones, Appellant, v. DOUBLE “D” PROPERTIES, INC., an Arkansas Corporation; Mark Wilcox, Commissioner of State Lands, State of Arkansas; Martha Stewart, in her official capacity as Assessor for Sebastian County; Frank Atkinson, in his official capacity as Collector for Sebastian County; Linda Murry, in her official capacity as Treasurer for Sebastian County, Arkansas; David Hudson, in his official capacity as County Judge for Sebastian County, Arkansas; County of Sebastian; Gus Wingfield, Arkansas State Treasurer; Fort Smith Public School System Board; Jeannie Cole, in her official and individual capacity as member of the Forth Smith School Board; David Cordell, in his official and individual capacity as member of the Fort Smith School Board; Rick Hittner, in his official and individual capacity as member of the Fort Smith School Board; Ann Dawson, in her official and individual capacity as member of the Fort Smith School Board; Barbara Hathcock, in her official and individual capacity as member of the Fort Smith School Board; Wyman R. Wade, in his official and individual capacity as member of the Fort Smith School Board; Yvonne Keaton-Martin, in her official and individual capacity as member of the Fort Smith School Board; University of Arkansas, at Fort Smith; City of Fort Smith, Arkansas; Ray Thornton, individually and in his official capacity as a Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court; Betty Dickey, individually and in her official capacity as a Justice for the Arkansas Supreme Court; Robert Brown, in his individual and official capacity as a Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court; Tom Glaze, in his individual and official capacity as a Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court; W.H. Arnold, in his individual and official capacity as a Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court; Donald L. Corbin, in his individual and official capacity as a Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court; Annabelle Clinton Imber, in her individual and official capacity as a Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court; Jim Hannah, in his individual and official capacity as a Justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court; James Mitch Llewellyn, Appellees.
    No. 05-2242.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted April 27, 2006.
    Filed May 5, 2006.
    Buck D. Jones, Fort Smith, AR, pro se.
    David Charles Gean, Gean & Gean, James M. Llewellyn, Jr., Thompson & Llewellyn, S. Walton Maurras, Smith & Maurras, Mark A. Horoda, Daily & Woods, Fort Smith, AR, Sherri L. Robinson, Attorney General’s Office, Michael R. Rainwater, Duncan & Rainwater, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.
    Before ARNOLD, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
   [UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Buck D. Jones (Buck) appeals the district court’s dismissal of an action he and his wife Robbie R. Jones, now deceased, brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. Having conducted de novo review of the record, see Gisslen v. City of Crystal, Minn., 345 F.3d 624, 626-27 (8th Cir.2003) (determination as to subject matter jurisdiction is reviewed de novo), cert, denied, 541 U.S. 960, 124 S.Ct. 1722, 158 L.Ed.2d 401 (2004), we conclude that the Joneses’ illegal-exaction claim—the only claim Buck addresses in his brief, and thus the only one before us—was barred under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, see Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 1521-22, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005) (Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies to cases brought by state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before federal proceedings were commenced, and inviting federal district courts to review and reject those judgments). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny both the University of Arkansas at Fort Smith’s motion for sanctions and Buck’s request to disqualify the University’s counsel. 
      
      . The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.
     
      
      . See D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust, 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).
     