
    IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JAMES HARRISON et al.
    
    Appeal from an order denying motion to vacate order reducing assessment.
    
      G. L. Sterling, for app’lt; S. P. Neville, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam.

We think that, for the reasons assigned hy the learned justice who heard the motion in the court below, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.  