
    Wills Valley Coal and Iron Company v. Lumpkin et al.
    
   Beck, J.

In several of the extracts from the charge to the jury, which were criticised in the motion for a new trial, there are palpable inaccuracies; but the instructions which the court gave upon the controlling issues in the case were substantially correct; and there being evidence to support tlie verdict, this court will not interfere with the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial. •

March 13, 1917.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Eite. Dade superior court. July 34, 1916.

Payne & Hale, for plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.  