
    Melvin THIESSEN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, United Automobile Workers of America, Local 882, International Union, United Automobile Workers of America, Defendants-Appellees, International Union, Defendant.
    No. 04-15208.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Nov. 3, 2005.
    Lorna Sills Katica, Katica & Associates, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Sarah T. Holloway, Lisa Combs Jern, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, GA, Lesley A. Troope, Nakamura, Quinn & Walls, Decatur, GA, for DefendantsAppellees.
    Before: TJOFLAT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and LAWSON, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Hugh Lawson, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1. 
      
      . 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
      When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
      (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
      (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
      (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
      (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
      (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.
     