
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Iupeli MIGI, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10047.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
    
    Filed Nov. 26, 2007.
    Susan Cushman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Clayton K. Kimoto, Esq., Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Iupeli Migi appeals from the district court’s revocation of his supervised release.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18, L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Migi’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     