
    POMIKAHL v. STATE.
    (No. 12343.)
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 10, 1929.
    C. G. Krueger, of Bellville, for appellant.
    A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   MARTIN, J.

Appellant was convicted of driving and operating a motor vehicle upon a public road in violation of article 1341, P. C. 1925, and a fine of $25 was assessed against him.

It uncontradictedly appears that appellant drove a car without the consent of the owner from Colorado county into Austin county. He was arrested in Austin county and charged with the above offense, to which charge he pleaded guilty and was given 15 days in jail, which judgment he satisfied. The judgment of conviction in Austin county was entered on May 26, 1928. He appears to have been arrested, tried, and convicted for the same offense in Colorado county, which judgment of conviction was entered on October 22,1928. Appellant in the county court of Colorado county interposed a plea of former conviction in proper form, attaching to his plea certified copies of complaint, information, and judgment of conviction in the county court of Austin county, supporting the same by proof. This was overruled. Appellant was tried and again convicted, from which judgment of conviction he appeals to this court.

Article 1341, P. C. 1925, under which appellant was prosecuted in both counties is in the nature of a continuous offense. Appellant drove a car from Colorado county to Austin county. It was one transaction and one offense and only one prosecution could be had thereon. The conviction in Austin county was a perpetual bar to any further prosecution and appellant’s plea of former conviction should have been sustained and appellant discharged. Appellant cannot twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense. Article 1, § 14, Constitution of Texas; Ex parte Davis, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 644, 89 S. W. 978, 122 Am. St. Rep. 775.

Because of the error discussed, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and cause remanded.

•PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.  