
    The United States of America against Dodge and others.
    ALBANY,
    January, 1817.
    Bonds given for duties to the CT» nited States, may be sued in the state courts, which have (by the judiciary act of the United Slates) with the courts of the United States, oiall-uita at common law, where me States
    
    THIS was an action of debt on a bond, given by the for the payment of duties to the collector of the district of Champlain. The bond was given in the form prescribed by the act of congress for the collection of duties, passed the 2d of March, 1799. The only question was, whether this court had jurisdiction of the cause.
    The case was submitted to the court without argument.
   Per Curiam.

The question submitted in this case is, whether this court has jurisdiction of the action. We are not able to cover where any doubt can exist upon this question. The action is upon a bond given by the defendants to the Uni1cd~ Stai~s, conditioned for the payment of certain duties, and is in the form prescribed by the act of congress. (Sess. 3. 5th Cong. ch. 128. s. 62.) On failure of payment of the duties, bonds thus taken are directed to be prosecuted (sec. 65.) in the proper courts having cognizance thereof. By the act to establish the judicial courts of the United States, (sess. 1. 1st Cong. ch. ~O. s. 9. and 11.,) it is declared, that the courts of the several states shall have cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the United States, of all suits at common law, where the United States are plaintiffs in the suit. Judgment must, accordingly, be for the plaintifi~.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.  