
    Ruth Jolis, Respondent, v. Bernard Jolis, Appellant.
   Plaintiff’s attorneys, . by divulging to her certain information obtained in the examination before trial violated the express terms of the prior order. However, we accept the statement that the attorneys did not understand that the restriction in the order applied to the plaintiff. In the circumstances we do not think there was a willful contempt. Order unanimously affirmed. Concur — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.  