
    In re HULSHOF. In the matter of one Hulshof.
    (Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.
    May, 1909.)
   PER CtJRIAM.

It is not made apparent that the Davis law is applicable to teachers of special subjects, such as German. Irrespective~ therefore, of the question of laches, it seems to the that petitioner is not even entitled to an alternative writ. Motion denied. See also, 130 App. Div. 903, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1139; 131 App. Div. 903, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1138.  