
    HATHAWAY v. GRAHAM et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    June 16, 1911.)
    Action by Edmund W. Hathaway against James P. Graham and others.
   PER CURIAM.

We think that the obligation imposed upon the plaintiff and the defendant Titcomb should be enlarged, so as to require them to respond to all liabilities of the partnership. The judgment should be modified in this respect, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. See, also, 128 N. Y. Supp. 1126.  