
    WOOD, Respondent, v. STUART, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 12, 1905.)
    Action by George R. Wood against Edmund A. Stuart.
   PER CURIAM.

We do not think the statement of items contained in the plaintiff’s bill of particulars constitutes an account of such a character as to justify a compulsory order of reference in this case. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.  