
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Arthur SHOEMAKER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-11070
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 16, 2008.
    Paul David Macaluso, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    James Arthur Shoemaker, Seagoville, TX, pro se.
    
      Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent James Arthur Shoemaker has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Shoemaker has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     