
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Frederick A. GRUNDY, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-50578.
    D.C. No. CR-98-00561-ABC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 17, 2003.
    Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Frederick A. Grundy appeals the district court’s judgment and sentence imposed following revocation of Grundy’s supervised release. Grundy’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw based on counsel’s failure to discover any arguable issues for review. Grundy did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues.

We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     