
    Harrison v. Vermont Manganese Co.
    (City Court of New York.—General Term,
    December, 1892.)
    Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant for services rendered it after incorporation and before the election of its first board of officers. It was proven that the services performed were clearly for the benefit of the defendant and was accepted by its incorporators and on the authority of all its officers; defendant, at the close of the case, moved for the dismissal of the complaint, and plaintiff thereupon moved for judgment. Held, that defendant, from the time of the granting of its charter, became a corporation for all intents and purposes; that its incorporators were liable from that time for all acts, whether it had a president or other officers; that the officers were only the medium through which it acted, and the incorporators could delegate its power to any of its members, or require all to act together. That by making its motion to dismiss, defendant thereby left the matter with the court, and plaintiff thereupon having moved for a direction in his favor, the question became one of fact for the court; that judgment for plaintiff was properly rendered.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs.
   McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $276.78, and is for services claimed to have been performed by the plaintiff in the month of September, 1889, for the defendant. The defendant’s organization sprang into existence in March or April, 1889, that being the date of the charter under which the incorporation met. The purposes of the organization are fully set out in the evidence. Among its incorporators were W. W. Flanagan, who was also connected with another company, a Mr. Russell P. Hoyt, who was elected its president shortly after the first meeting of the incorporators, and a James Gwatkin, another incorporator, who was secretary. About August 27, 1889, at the request of some of these incorporators, the plaintiff was directed to call a meeting of the shareholders of the defendant, which was done by the plaintiff, and such meeting took place on September 16, 1889, and the organization then, so far as the election of its officers and the performance of some other routine business, was completed. Defendant had, from the time of the granting of the charter, become a corporation for all intents and purposes. Its incorporators would be liable from that time for all acts whether it had a president or other officer. The officers are only the medium through which it acts, and the incorporators could delegate its power to any of its members or require all to act together. The services performed were clearly for the benefit of the defendant and were accepted by its incorporators. Hooker v. Eagle Bank of Rochester, 30 N. Y. 83.

It was on the authority of all the officers. The defendant having, by its motion to dismiss at the close of the case, left the matter with the court, and the plaintiff thereupon having moved for a direction in his favor, the question became one of fact for the court. From the evidence in the case, we find no error, and think the judgment was properly rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and, therefore, should be affirmed, with costs.

McGowan, P. J., and Van Wyok, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.  