
    3248.
    Coleman v. Mullis.
    Decided December 19, 1911.
    Complaint; from city court of Eastman — Judge Griffin.
    January 24, 1911.
    
      J. A. Neese, for plaintiff in error.
    W. M. Clements, contra.
   Russell, J.

1. There was no error in overruling the motion to dismiss because of the alleged defects in the process.

2. The answer being insufficient in law to constitute a defense to the note sued on, there was no error in striking it and rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed.  