
    RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC. v. Joan LICHTMAN v. Marvin Levin, C.P.A., Mary Duden, Stanton Oswald, Esquire, William Lederer, E. Gerald Riesenbach, Esquire, Jon Sirlin, Esquire, Dana Plon, Esquire and Peter Lesser, Esquire Petition of Joan Lichtman.
    No. 126 EM 2008.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Nov. 5, 2008.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2008, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, and the “Emergency Motion to Amend Supersedeas,” which is treated as a Motion for Stay, are DENIED. Respondents’ Motion to Consolidate is DISMISSED AS MOOT.  