
    HALF-HOLIDAY LAW.
    [Cuyahoga Circuit Court,
    1897.]
    Caldwell, Hale and Marvin, JJ.
    Diemer v. Hudson.
    ’The Saturday Hale-Holiday Daw is Unconstitutional.
    The Saturday half-holiday law, 92 O. D-, 208, applicable only to cities having a a population of 50,000, or over, is one on a general subject, and as there is no ground whatever upon which the legislature can make that classification the law is unconstitutional.
   Caldwell, J.

The Saturday half-holiday law, applicable to cities having a population of 50,000, or over, 92 O. L., 208, passed by our legislature last .spring, is unconstitutional.

This was a replevin case, and the claim was made that a writ made •out and served on a Saturday afternoon was illegal. In the common pleas court Judge Dissette declared that the proceeding was illegal because the writ was served on a legal half-holiday; this declared the half-holiday law to be constitutional. The circuit court hold: The half-holiday law is one on a general subject. A general holiday is a subject of a nature pertaining to every part of the state, and there is no natural distinction existing between those parts of the state that are subject to the law and those that are not. There is no ground whatever upon which the legislature can make that classification, and for this reason the law is unconstitutional. The action of the common pleas court is overruled and the case is remanded.  