
    Vincent MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Mark C. Moore; Deborah B. Barbier, Assistant U.S. Attorney; United States Probation Department; Dickie Brunson, Chief U.S. Probation Officer; Myra E. Bailey, Supervising US Probation Officer; Earl Gillam, US Probation Officer; US Federal Public Defenders Office; United States Marshall Service, Greenville Division; Greenville South Carolina Sheriffs Office, State of; Justin Hughes, Officer, all Defendants officially and individually; Honorable Margaret B. Seymour; US Bureau of Prisons; Unicor Prison Industry; David Plowden; Catherine E. Evatt; United States Marshal’s Service, Columbia Division, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-6630.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 10, 2010.
    Decided Nov. 23, 2010.
    Vincent Missouri, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Missouri appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Missouri v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). To the extent Missouri requests in his informal brief to waive the appellate case filing fee and to amend his complaint, we deny those requests. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  