
    Mario Humberto GONZALEZ-GODINEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 00-3922.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted June 15, 2001.
    Filed Aug. 3, 2001.
    
      Before LOKEN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and BATAILLON, District Judge.
    
      
       The HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Three times in 1991 and early 1992, seventeen-year-old Mario Humberto Gonzalez-Godinez was seized by the Guatemalan military for conscription into the army. Each time, he escaped. In July 1992, while hiding from the army near his family’s home, Gonzalez-Godinez encountered Guatemalan guerrillas, who urged him to join their insurgency forces. Fearing both the army and the guerrillas, GonzalezGodinez fled Guatemala and illegally entered the United States in November 1992. The Immigration and Naturalization Service commenced deportation proceedings. Gonzalez-Godinez conceded deportability and applied for asylum or withholding of deportation. He now appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals that he is ineligible for asylum or withholding of deportation because he does not have a well-founded fear of persecution within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(42)(A), 1158(b)(1).

The BIA concluded that Gonzalez-Godinez does not have a well-founded fear of persecution on account of his political opinions because there is no evidence the Guatemalan military considers him a subversive and no evidence the guerrillas would harm him if he continues to refuse to join them. Although Gonzalez-Godinez argues that he has a well-founded fear of imprisonment or punishment by the army if he returns to Guatemala, the BIA properly observed, “If [the army is] looking for him, it is justified by his repeated desertions and possible complicity in murder [that occurred while he was at an army camp]. The [Guatemalan army’s] method of conscription ... is not persecution.” Likewise, that guerrillas attempted to recruit Gonzalez-Godinez into their fighting forces does not establish persecution on account of his political opinions. See Miranda v. INS, 139 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 1998). After careful review of the administrative record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the agency’s decision to deny asylum and withholding of deportation. Accordingly, we affirm.  