
    PARIS v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 8, 1911.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097) — Appeal—Record— Questions Peesented foe Review.
    Where there is no statement of facts on appeal, the contention urged on motion for new trial that the judgment is contrary to the law and not supported by the evidence cannot be determined.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2938; Dee. Dig. § 1097.]
    Appeal from Johnson County Court; J. B. Haynes, Judge.
    Jim Paris was convicted of aggravated assault, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for aggravated assault. The record is before us' without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The only question suggested for revision is found in the motion for a new trial, to wit: The judgment is contrary to the law and not supported by the evidence. As the statement of facts is not before us, we are unable to determine those questions. The conviction is in harmony with the allegations contained in the pleadings.

The judgment is affirmed.  