
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gabriel FRIAS-PINA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-50809
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 18, 2007.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Gabriel Frias-Pina, pro se.
    Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Gabriel Frias-Pina (Frias) appeals his 60-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. For the first time on appeal, Frias argues that the district court committed error by enhancing his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his prior Texas conviction for aggravated robbery. Our review is limited to plain error. United States v. Gonzalez-Chavez, 432 F.3d 334, 336 (5th Cir.2005).

Under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), a defendant’s base offense level is increased by 16 levels if he was previously deported after a conviction of a crime of violence. Robbery is an enumerated crime of violence in the application notes to § 2L1.2, comment. (n.l(B)(iii)). Frias has not shown plain error in the increase of his offense level based on his prior aggravated robbery conviction. See United States v. Santiestebartr-Hemandez, 469 F.3d 376, 378, 381 (5th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     