
    Peck v. The State of Ohio.
    (No. 24336
    Decided October 11, 1933.)
    
      Messrs. Brown é Ong, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. Arthur L. Hooper, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. J esse. K. George, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Weygandt, O. J., Allen, Stephenson, Matthias and Bevls, JJ., concur.  