
    In the Matter of David J. ALLMOND, Esquire, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    No. 94-BG-383.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Oct. 19, 1995.
    Before: FARRELL and KING, Associate Judges, and BELSON, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, recommending that the respondent be suspended for six months, letter from Bar Counsel electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, and it appearing that respondent has not filed an exception to the discipline recommended by the Board on Professional Responsibility, and it further appearing that respondent has failed to file the required affidavit in compliance with D.C.Bar R. XI, § 11(d) following the effective date of this Court’s interim suspension order of April 15, 1994, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, that, pursuant to Rule XI, § 11(f)(1) of the Rules Governing the Bar, effective January 1,1995, the recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility to impose discipline consisting of a six month suspension from the practice of law is hereby adopted and imposed by this Court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that said six months suspension shall begin thirty days after the date of this order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirement of D.C.App. Rule XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of § 16(c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with § 14, including the filing of the required affidavit.  