
    Otto Davis, by Emma Davis, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Broadalbin Knitting Company, Respondent.
    
      Davis v. Broadalbin Knitting Co., 90 App. Div. 567, affirmed.
    (Argued June 7, 1906;
    decided June 21, 1906.)
    Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered February IT, 1904, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.
    
      Ilenry V. Borst and Florence J. Sulli/ocm for appellant.
    
      Lewis E. Garr and Edward W. Douglas for respondent.
   Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all the courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J. Not sitting: Chase, J.  