
    
      Present — Chancellors Ruteedge, Hctso2t, and Mathews.
    Bowman and wife vs. Middleton.
    OCTOBER, 1789.
    CASE LIV,
    n. b. p. 215.
    Court ordei,. ed new trial, a“s® dict was gi-Sue directed
   On hearing Messrs. Moultrie and Pringle, solicitors for complainants, on a question for a new trial at common law, on an issue formerly directed and verdict found for defendant: And on hearing Mr. Parker, solicitor for defendant against the motion, ordered, that a trial at law be had de novo. The court also recommended that in consequence of a difference of opinion in the surveyors employed in surveying the lands in dispute, that other surveyors be called in»  