
    Francisco AQUINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-2488.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 30, 1995.
    Francisco Aquino, Bowling Green, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.850 motion in proper form. We do not have a sufficient record to determine whether, if appellant does file a rule 3.850 motion, it would be successive under rule 3.850(f), and this opinion should not be construed as deciding that issue.

DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.  