
    Charles W. Shaffer, Appellant, v. Vandewater & Company, Limited, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November, 1912.)
    Municipal Courts — entry of judgment — Municipal Court Act, § 230 — appeal.
    Where, on the last day for rendition of judgment under the statute, and stipulation of the parties, a justice of the Municipal Court of the city of New York signed a judgment dated two days ahead, the delivery thereof by him in the clerk’s office on the day he signed it, at an hour when the office was closed for public business, was not within the time prescribed by section 230 of the Municipal Court Act, and said judgment will he reversed for lack of jurisdiction.
    Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, seventh district, rendered in favor of the defendant by the court sitting without a jury.
    Edgar H. Dollin (George B. Keeler, of counsel), for appellant.
    Henry Kuntz (Abraham P. Wilkes, of counsel), for respondent.
   Searury, J.

This judgment must be reversed, because it was not rendered in accordance with the terms of the statute. The last day under the statute and stipulation of the parties upon which the court below was authorized in this case to render judgment was February 27, 1912. At five forty-five p. m. on that day, the justice before whom this cause was pending signed the judgment and left it in the clerk’s office. The judgment was.dated as having been signed by the justice on February 29, 1912. At the time the justice left the judgment in the clerk’s office on February twenty-seventh, the clerks had left the office for the day, and the office itself was closed to the public. Whether we assume that the delivery in the office was equivalent to the delivery to the clerk to be filed the next day (Hathaway v. Howell, 54 N. Y. 97), or that, in view of the date upon the judgment, the justice intended it to be filed on February twenty-ninth, it is clear that in either case the decision was not filed within the time prescribed by section 230 of the Municipal • Court Act. In neither alternative can the decision properly be said to have been delivered to the clerk within the statutory time. It is well settled that, where,the decision of a justice is not delivered to the clerk within the time prescribed by statute, the justice, loses jurisdiction of the cause. Van Valis v. Charcona, 40 Misc. Rep. 226.

Guy and Bijur, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.  