
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Latuniua POHAHAU, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-10050
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted January 3, 2017 
    
    Filed January 05, 2017
    Thomas C. Muehleck, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ—Office of the US Attorney, Honolulu, HI, fo.r Plaintiff-Appellee
    Latuniua Pohahau, Pro Se
    Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Latuniua Pohahau appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 210-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pohahau’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Poha-hau the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Pohahau has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     