
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zeb ARTIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-6713.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 14, 2012.
    Decided: June 20, 2012.
    Zeb Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zeb Artis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Artis, No. 3:06-cr-00304-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  