
    Richard BENKA, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Yihwa Sung OUTERBRIDGE, M.D., Pier Frank, M.D., Stephen F. Dickey, M.D., P.A., d/b/a Doctor’s Walk-In Clinic of North Tampa, Appellees, F. Reed Murtagh, M.D., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
    No. 88-344.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 22, 1989.
    Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., and Adam H. Lawrence of Lawrence & Daniels, Miami, and Butler and Apgar, P.A., Tampa, for appellant, cross-appellee.
    William E. Hahn and Joseph M. Fasi, II of Shear, Newman, Hahn & Rosenkranz, P.A., Tampa, for appellees.
    Judith W. Simmons and Kenneth A. Bey-tin of Foley & Lardner, Tampa, for appel-lee/cross-appellant.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant failed to object or acquiesced in the trial court to the various aspects raised on appeal regarding jury instructions and evidence. Thus, those aspects were not preserved for appeal. See Rindfleisch v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 498 So.2d 488, 491-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417 So.2d 275, 276-77 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.  