
    Wesley Yandel v. Territory.
    No. 2118.
    Opinion Filed November 18, 1909.
    (104 Pac. 923.)
    1. COURTS — Criminal Court of Appeals — Rules of Practice— 'Power to Make. The power to make reasonable rules for the regulation of the practice before the Criminal Court of Appeals is expressly conferred upon the court by statute. Section 10, art. 2, c. 14, p. 172, Sess. Laws 1909.
    2. APPEAL — Review—Dismissal of Appeal — Grounds. A motion to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution will be sustained, where the record shows there has been a failure by the appellant to comply with the rules and orders of the court in said ■ case.
    (Syllabus toy the Court.)
    
      Appeal from District Court, Pottawatomie County; B. F. Bunvell, Judge.
    
    Wesley Yandel was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
   PEE CUKIAM.

On the 21st day of March, 1906, the grand jury returned into the district court in and for Pottawatomie county, Okla. T., an indictment against Wesley Yandel and Ben Mitchell, charging them with the crime of murder. The defendants were arraigned and pleas entered, and on March 29, 1906, on application of the defendants, a severance was granted, and the court ordered that the cause proceed to trial against the defendant Wesley Yandel. The trial was begun on said day, and on the 31st day of March, 1906, the jury returned into court a verdict against the defendant Wesley Yandel, finding him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree. Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were duly filed and overruled by the court and exceptions allowed. Thereupon the defendant was sentenced to serv> a term of eight years in the penitentiary. Time was given to the defendant in which to make and serve' a case-made on his appeal to the Supreme Court, and his bail was fixed at $7,000, which was given. On March 25, 1907, the ease-made and petition in error was filed in the Supreme Court of the territory of Oklahoma. Upon the admission of Oklahoma as a state the case was transferred to the Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma. Upon the organization of the Criminal Court of Appeals, as directed by statute, the Supreme Court transferred the case to this court, but no record, ease-made, and petition in error have ever been trans-fered to this court. No appearance has ever been made in this court on behalf of the defendant, although said ease has been continued from term to term since the organization of this court.

For this reason, it appearing that the defendant has abandoned his appeal, the appeal is, on the motion of Assistant Attorney General, Charles L. Moore, dismissed for want of prosecution, with directions to the district court of Pottawatomie county to enfore/ die judgment and sentence.  