
    Wright et al. vs. Ammons et al.
    
    1. The grant of a new trial by the presiding judge, on the ground that “ he did not think in this case that plaintiffs have been fairly dealt with,” is too vague to be satisfactory.
    2. There being no error on the part of the court in the trial of this case made apparent in the record, and the evidence requiring the verdict which was found, the court erred in granting a new trial.
    3. The return of commissioners laying out dower in behalf of a widow from certain land, is not admissible as tending to show title in the ■ estate of her deceased husband, as against persons who were neither parties nor privies to such assignment.
    December 30, 1882.
   Speer, Justice.  