
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Isidoro Contreras, Appellant.
   Contrary to defendant’s claim, the evidence of his guilt of both offenses, including the required proof of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, was overwhelming (see, People v Bongarzone, 116 AD2d 164; People v Menache, 98 AD2d 335). Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.  