
    25340.
    Hale v. The State.
    Decided December 20, 1935.
    
      M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error.
    
      James F. Kelly, solicitor-general, J. Ralph Rosser, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

Tne defendant was convicted of simple larceny. The evidence, although wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based on the usual general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre amd Guerry, JJ., concur.  