
    FINCK, Appellant, v. BERGER, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    April 16, 1901.)
    Action by John Finck against Bertha Berger. From a judgment of the New York municipal court in favor of defendant,' plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    William R. Bronk, for appellant.
    Charles L. Hoffman, tor respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon a simple issue of fact both parties sought to impose upon the credulity of the court. The version of either has suspicious circumstances. Judgment had to follow for the defendant, as there was not sufficient credible testimony in favor of the plaintiff to •carry a finding in his favor. Judgment affirmed, with costs.  