
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Deshon STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-6747.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 22, 2013.
    Decided: Aug. 27, 2013.
    Lorenzo Deshon Stephens, Appellant pro se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    
      Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Deshon Stephens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Our review of the record convinces us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Stephens a reduction of sentence on the basis of public safety. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stephens, No. 3:06-cr-00281-HEH-l (E.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  