
    DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. APPLE INC., AT & T Services, Inc., Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Cox Communications, Inc., DirecTV, LLC, Dish Network LLC, Sirius XM Radio Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
    2016-2186
    2016-2453
    2016-2454
    2016-2456
    2016-2459
    2016-2460
    2016-2461
    2016-2462
    2016-2463
    2016-2464
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Decided: November 1, 2017
    
      Lei Mei, Mei & Mark LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Laurence M. Sandell.
    Michael Jay, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Santa Monica, CA, argued for defendant-appellee Apple Inc. Also represented by Nandan Padmanabhan.
    Michael Hawes, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendants-appel-lees- AT & T Services, Inc., DISH Network LLC, DirecTV, LLC. Defendant-appellee AT & T Services, Inc. also represented by Michelle Jacobson Eber, Roger Fulghum; Bryant C. Boren, Jr., Palo Ato, CA. Defendant-appellee DISH Network LLC also represented by Bradley Bowling, Ali Dhanani, Michael Sherby; George Hopkins Guy, III, Palo Ato, CA; Jamie Roy Lynn, Washington, DC. Defendant-appellee DirecTV, LLC also represented by Kevin Gerard McBride, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Irvine, CA; John Wittenzeller, Philadelphia, PA.
    Michael Martin Murray, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Cox Communications, Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. Aso represented by Michael Louis Brody, Chicago, IL; Geoffrey P. Eaton, Washington, DC.
    Mark Baghdassarian, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee Sirius XM Radio Inc. Aso represented by Shannon H. Hedvat.
    Before Moore, Mayer, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.
   Stoll, Circuit Judge.

Dragon Intellectual Property appeals the district court's Final Judgments entered pursuant to the parties’ stipulations of noninfringement of claims 1-4, 8, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 5,930,444. Our decision today in a related case, Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC v. DISH Network LLC et al., Nos. 2016-2468, -2492, affirms the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s determination that claims 1-4, 7-10, 13, and 14 of the ’444 patent are invalid. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.

DISMISSED AS MOOT

Costs

No costs.  