
    First National Bank of Detroit, Michigan, Appellant, v. Harry B. Hollins and Another, Defendants, Impleaded with Rafael R. Govin, Respondent.
   We think that the amended complaint in this action is sufficiently explicit, and that the order directing the service by the plaintiff of a bill of particulars was erroneous. Therefore, the order directing the service of the bill of particulars is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.  