
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pamela D. MEZA, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-10047.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.
    
    Filed Feb. 24, 2012.
    Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

The United States appeals the district court’s order reducing the criminal forfeiture money judgment against Pamela D. Meza. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

In light of our holding in United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir.2011), we vacate the district court’s order reducing Meza’s criminal forfeiture money judgment to $298,646.00, and we remand.

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     