
    R.T. FAULK, III, Corey Farms, L.L.C.; Faulk Farms, Incorporated; Joanne Hodges; River Valley Properties; McHenry Farms, L.L.C.; Sherman Shaw; T.P. Godwin; William G. Nadler; McHenry Realty Partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-30669.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 13, 2015.
    David E. Verlander, III, Esq., McLeod Verlander, Brady Dean King, II, McNew, King, Mills, Burch & Landry, L.L.P., Thomas G. Zentner, Jr., Esq., Nelson, Zentner, Sartor & Snellings, L.L.C., Monroe, LA, Richard Lewis McHenry, Esq., Jones Walker LLP, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    Richard P. Bress, Attorney, Andrew D. Prins, Latham & Watkins, L.L.P., Washington, DC, Alissa Jean Allison, Esq., William Hector Howard, III, Kathlyn Gloria Perez, Esq., Paul Lee Peyronnin, Esq., Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C., New Orleans, LA, Samuel W. Caverlee, James Richard Sterritt, Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, A.P.L.C., Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

This case concerns a dispute over the proposed closing of several private railroad crossings in Louisiana. The district court determined that the railroads have a servitude, rather than fee-simple ownership, over the land. It then certified to this court the question of whether a Louisiana statute preventing the railroads from closing the private crossings violates the Louisiana Constitution’s prohibition on takings. We granted the interlocutory appeal, addressed certain issues, and certified the remaining dispositive issue to the Louisiana Supreme Court pursuant to Louisiana Supreme Court Rule XII § 1 and La.Rev. Stat. § 13:72.1. See Faulk v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 576 Fed.Appx. 345 (5th Cir.2014). That court accepted the certified question and issued its answer on June 30, 2015. Faulk v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 2014-1598 La. 6/30/15, - So.3d -, 2015 WL 3972503 (2015) (answering certified question); Faulk v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 151 So.3d 611 (La.2014) (granting certification). We ordered supplemental briefing by the parties on the subject of whether any further issues remain to be resolved by this court at this point. They stated that there are not, and we agree.

Accordingly, the district court’s March 22, 2013 partial summary judgment order certified for interlocutory appeal is AFFIRMED and the case is REMANDED for appropriate further proceedings. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     