
    CHERRY v. SHARP et al.
    No. 23629.
    Opinion Filed July 12, 1933.
    Cox & Cox and E. A. Poster, for plaintiff in error.
    Erwin •& Érwin, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

On May 10, 1932, this eoisrt entered its order granting a stay of execution in cause No. 11103, in the district court of Lincoln county, pending the application • for- supersedeas bond in this court and ordering that upon the filing of super-sedeas bond by the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000, such stay would be effective as a permanent order.

On June 20, 1932, a motion to vacate this stay of execution and order allowing super-sedeas bond was filed based upon the fact .that there had been no compliance with the requirement of the order made by Chief Justice Riley. A response has been filed under date of June 24, 1932, admitting that they have been unable to comply with the order of the court, but attempting to excuse their failure to comply with the order of the court upon numerous grounds.

This court has held in Kirk v. Leeman, 163 Okla. 236, 18 P. (2d) 1088, that upon failure to comply with the order of the court requiring execution of a supersedeas bond for the purpose denominated in the order staying execution thereon, this court will vacate the order staying execution and permit execution to issue.

It is therefore the order of this court that the order heretofore made on May 10, 1932, staying execution in cause No. 11103 in the district court of Lincoln county, be, and the same is hereby, vacated and the plaintiff in that cause is permitted to issue execution thereon or seek such remedy as the law provides in the absence of a stay of execution.  