
    19381.
    Elrod v. Continental Casualty Co.
    Decided March 6, 1929.
    
      William B. & Gordon Mann, for plaintifE.
    
      Maddox, Maddox & Mitchell, for defendant.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The assignment of error in the bill of exceptions upon the ruling out of certain testimony can not be considered by this court, since the testimony excluded is set out so vaguely and obscurely as not to be thoroughly understandable. In the state of the record no question is raised by this assignment of error.

2. Under the evidence adduced by the plaintiff a nonsuit was properly awarded. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  