
    Celina QUEVEDO-WOOLF v. Merry Eileen OVERHOLSER and Daniel Carter
    No. 361P18
    Supreme Court of North Carolina.
    June 11, 2019
    James P. Hoffman, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Overholser, Merry Eileen.
    William W. Cameron, Attorney at Law, Salisbury, for State.
    Jessica S. Bullock, Carolyn J. Woodruff, Attorneys at Law, Greensboro, for Quevedo-Woolf, Celina
    Daniel Carter, for Carter, Daniel.
    ORDER
   Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 23rd of October 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of October 2018 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 5th of November 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."  