
    BEAN v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 22, 1911.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1182*) — Appeal and Error —Necessity op Bill op Exceptions.
    Where the record of a criminal appeal contains neither a bill of exceptions nor a motion for a new trial, and where the indictment properly charges the offense, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. § 1182.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Panola County; W. C. Buford, Judge.
    Walter Bean was convicted of the theft of a hog, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted in the district court of Panola county of theft of a hog, and sentenced to two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

There are neither bills of exceptions nor a motion for a new trial in the" record. We have examined the indictment, and it properly charges the offense. The charge of the court submits this offense, and the facts sustain the charge.

The judgment is affirmed.  