
    BARNES against FAIRHOLME.
    ON CERTIORARI.
    The state of demand on which the action b.elow was founded, was as follows:
    
      
    
   By the Court.

The state of demand is insensible; an action cannot be sustained for cash paid, unless paid by mistake, or under other particular circumstances, which ought to be set out in the state of demand.

Judgment reversed.

Cited in Denny v. Quintin, 4 Dutch. 134.  