
    Howard McCALISTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 90102.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    June 17, 2008.
    Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Lisa M. Kennedy, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Howard McCalister, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object or requesting a mistrial during the testimony of a certain witness.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).  