
    BATTLE v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 1, 1911.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097) — Appeal—Review-Bill oír Exceptions.
    That a conviction was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the verdict was not responsive to the evidence, cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a statement of facts.
    [Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2938-2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097.]
    Appeal from District Court, Ft. Bend County; Wells Thompson, Judge.
    Will Battle was convicted of murder, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. A tty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic ana section NUMBER in Dee. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

In this case appellant was indicted by the grand jury of Ft. Bend County, charged with murder. He was tried, found guilty of murder in the second degree, and his punishment assessed at 10 years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. The record contains no bills of exception, and the motion for a new trial contains but two grounds: “(1) The verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and the evidence. (2) The verdict was not responsive to the evidence” — neither of which can bd reviewed, in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.  