
    Xavier CRAVENWOLFE Plaintiff-Appellant v. Robert CARTER, ACI Director; Tim Lowery, ACI Furniture Factory Plant Manager; Randal Raper, ACI Furniture Factory Floor Manager Defendants-Appellees
    No. 16-2665
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 15, 2016
    Filed: November 29, 2016
    Xavier Cravenwolfe, Pro Se
    Bourgon Burnelle Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Ap-pellees
    Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Xavier Cravenwolfe appeals after the district court dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice, following its determination that Cra-venwolfe failed to exhaust administrative remedies.

We conclude that the district court did not err in its determination, as the record showed beyond genuine dispute that Cra-venwolfe omitted material information that was required on a grievance appeal form. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (no action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under § 1983 by prisoner until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted); King v. Iowa Dep’t. of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of district court’s interpretation of § 1997e(a)); see also Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 218, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007) (prison’s administrative exhaustion requirements govern whether exhaustion has occurred); Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90-91, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (proper exhaustion demands compliance with prison’s deadlines and other critical procedural rules); Chelette v. Harris, 229 F.3d 684, 688 (8th Cir. 2000) (inmate’s subjective beliefs about grievance process cannot excuse exhaustion requirement).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny as moot Cravenwolfe’s pending motion for appointment of counsel. 
      
      . The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
     