
    No. 45436.
    Protests 888732-G, etc., of Chong Lung et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) and Ueland v. United States (T. D. 46923) certain of the merchandise was held free of duty as crude drugs under paragraph 1669. Drugs, sliced, were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34.  