
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio NAJERA-CORCHADO, a.k.a. Lucio Corchado-Najera, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-10239
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted January 18, 2017 
    
    Filed January 23, 2017
    Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, Louis Charles Uhl, USAO—US Attorneys Office (Yuma), Yuma, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Lucio Najera-Corchado, Pro Se
    Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Lucio Najera-Corchado appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Najera-Corchado’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have considered Najera-Corchado’s October 4, 2016, pro se submission. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     