
    NEWHOFF & SONS et al. v. CLEGG & CO. et al.
    
    June 12, 1896. By two Justices. Argued at the last term.
    Equitable petition. Before Judge Eisb. Sumter superior court. November term, 1894.
    
      Gutts & Hixon, Glarke & Hooper, Lumpkin & Nisbet and Ansley & Ansley, for plaintiffs. James Dodson <8 Son, E. -i. Hawlcins and Fort cG Watson, contra.
   Lumpkin, J.

The evidence introduced and relied upon by the plaintiffs to impeach as fraudulent a mortgage attacked by their petition was insufficient to authorize a finding that it was not a' Iona fide and valid lien for the amount expressed upon its face; and consequently there was no error in dismissing the petition as to the defendant who held this mortgage.

Judgment affirmed,  