
    John H. WEBSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 06-74611.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Feb. 26, 2008.
    
    Filed March 7, 2008.
    John H. Webster, Santa Clara, CA, pro se.
    Donald L. Korb, Internal Revenue Service, Eileen J. O’Connor, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Responden1>-Appel-lee.
    Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

John H. Webster appeals pro se from the tax court’s order granting summary-judgment for the Commissioner and imposing a penalty against Webster under 26 U.S.C. § 6673. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo the tax court’s summary judgment. Miller v. Comm’r, 310 F.3d 640, 642 (9th Cir.2002). We review for abuse of discretion the tax court’s imposition of a section 6673 penalty. Grimes v. Comm’r, 806 F.2d 1451, 1454 (9th Cir.1986) (per cu-riam). We affirm.

Webster contends that no law requires him to pay taxes, and that, given the government’s actions in an unrelated felony case against him, the Thirteenth Amendment prohibits collection of taxes from him. We reject these arguments as frivolous. See, e.g., Wilcox v. Comm’r, 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 (9th Cir.1988). Contrary to Webster’s contention, the tax court lacks jurisdiction to investigate unrelated claims. See Comm’r v. McCoy, 484 U.S. 3, 7, 108 S.Ct. 217, 98 L.Ed.2d 2 (1987). This court therefore also lacks jurisdiction. See id. at 7, 108 S.Ct. 217. The tax court properly upheld the Commissioner’s tax determination.

The tax court also acted well within its discretion when imposing a penalty against Webster for taking a frivolous position. In a previous case, the tax court had warned Webster that section 6673 penalties would be imposed “if he returns to this Court with similar arguments in the future.” Webster v. Comm’r, T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-43 (April 24, 2002).

Webster’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     