
    New York Rapid Transit Corporation, Respondent, v. Bronx Investment Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant. (Action No. 1.)
   Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We hold that the complaint states a cause of action against the appellant, and, for the purposes of this motion, that its allegations support the respondent’s contention that the after-acquired property clauses in the mortgages of the Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company and the Kings County_ Elevated Railroad Company do not affect the plaintiff’s title to the piece of real estate involved in this action. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.  