
    In the Matter of David Russell, Appellant, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.
    Submitted April 10, 2006;
    decided June 29, 2006
   Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.  