
    Bridges and another v. Canfield and others. Same v. Canfield and others.
    
      July 14. 1834.
    Where non resident complainants give security for costs and one of the sureties becomes insolvent, a new one must be added and proceedings stayed until it is done.
    Complainants were non residents. They had been required to give the usual security for costs. This had been done: but one of the sureties in both suits had become in-80 ventl An application was now made, through an affidavit, “ that the complainants file new or further security for costs in each suit in such sum as the court may be pleased to direct and that until such security be filed and the surety, if excepted to, shall have justified, all proceedings on the part of the complainants be stayed or for such furthe rorder,” &c.
    Mr. O. Bushnell moved.
    Mr. W. S. Sears opposed.
   The Vice-Chancellor

granted the application.  