
    19054.
    Hines v. The State.
    Decided October 2, 1928.
    
      W. A. Dampier, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. A. Merritt, solicitor, contra.
   Luke, J.

It appearing from the uncontradicted evidence in this case that the defendant was in possession of whisky as charged, the trial judge properly overruled the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the usual general grounds, and the conviction must stand.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles. O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  