
    Paul Charles WESCH, Plaintiff, Michael Figures, et al., Intervenors-Plaintiffs, v. Guy HUNT, et al., Defendants.
    Civ. A. No. 91-0787.
    United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D.
    March 9, 1992.
    Judgment Affirmed May 18, 1992.
    See 112 S.Ct. 1926.
    
      David A. Boyett, III and Ferrell S. An-ders, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff.
    Ronnie L. Williams, Mobile, Ala. and John H. England, Jr., Tuscaloosa, Ala., for intervenor s-plaintiff s.
    Algert S. Agricola, Jr., Mark Montiel, Montgomery, Ala., Michael A. Carvin, Washington, D.C., Ronald C. Forehand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert M. Givhan, Walter S. Turner, Office of Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., James C. Wood, Mobile, Ala., Taylor D. Wilkins, Jr., Bay Minette, Ala., Jack Booker Weaver, Windell C. Owens, Monroeville, Ala., George W. Fendley, III, Camden, Ala., Bruce N. Wilson, Grove Hill, Ala. and Michael Onderdonk, Chatom, Ala., for defendants.
    Devon Wiggins, pro se.
    Gregory B. Stein, Henry Brewster, Mobile, Ala.
    Jack Drake, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
   MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before COX, Circuit Judge, HAND, Senior District Judge, and ALBRITTON, District Judge.

BY THE COURT.

INTRODUCTION

On September 23, 1991, Plaintiff Paul Charles Wesch brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Governor of Alabama, as well as other state officials, contending, inter alia, that the present State law defining congressional districts in the State of Alabama violates Art. I, § 2 of the Constitution. Based on 1990 census data, Wesch specifically alleges that if the 1992 congressional elections were to be held under the present district-ing plan, it would violate his right to the constitutionally mandated “one-person, one-vote” scheme of representation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284(a), this three-judge court was convened. On December 9, 1991, Michael Figures and others, who assert a claim under the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq., were granted leave to intervene. A two day trial was held.

Having considered the evidence and the post-trial submissions of the parties, the court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The Plaintiff Paul Charles Wesch is a citizen of the United States and is a resident and registered voter in the First Congressional District of Alabama as presently configured.

2. The Intervenor-Plaintiffs, Michael Figures and others, are African-American citizens of the United States and the State of Alabama. They have been allowed to intervene in this litigation both on their own behalf and on behalf of all African-American citizens of the State of Alabama.

3. It was agreed by all parties, including the Plaintiff-Intervenors, that the complaint of intervention would proceed on an allegation that § 2 of the Voting Rights Act has been violated, insofar as the class represented by the intervenors had been denied meaningful access to the voting process that would allow them to elect candidates of their choice.

4. The court notes that the original complaint was filed in September, a fact known to the Plaintiff-Intervenors who chose not to intervene until December 4, 1991. Therefore, the Plaintiff-Intervenors were permitted to intervene only after they agreed to comply with all procedures and deadlines in place.

5. The Defendant Guy Hunt is the Governor of Alabama. The Defendant Billy Joe Camp is the Secretary of State of Alabama. The Defendants Lionel W. Noonan, Harry D’Olive, Devon Wiggins, Otha Lee Biggs, Jerry Bogan, Clarence Watters, and Tom W. Turner are the Probate Judges of the seven counties which presently comprise the First Congressional District of Alabama. All Defendants are sued both in their individual and official capacities. All Defendants have significant duties in the administration of congressional elections in Alabama.

6. This court advised the parties of its intent to employ Professor Harold W. Stanley as the court’s expert to assist in considering any and all plans for redistricting that might be submitted, and to advise the court on the statistical issues in regard to any possible redistricting. The court extended to the parties the opportunity to state if there were any objections to the court’s selection of this expert. No objections were filed. After the trial, the parties were also given the opportunity to object to the statistical information relied on by Professor Stanley, the same information underlying this order. No objections were filed.

7. In 1981, the Alabama Legislature enacted the current version of Ala. Code § 17-20-1 (1987), which divided the state into seven congressional districts. During 1990, the Bureau of the Census of the United States Department of Commerce conducted a census of the United States, including the State of Alabama, pursuant to constitutional authority. On January 16, 1991, the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives notified Governor Hunt that Alabama would retain seven seats in the House of Representatives following the 1990 census. (Statement of Agreed Facts and Exhibit A thereto.)

8. According to the 1990 census, Alabama’s total population is 4,040,587 persons. In order to achieve exact population equality among each of Alabama’s seven congressional districts, the ideal population of each district would be 577,227 persons. (Statement of Agreed Facts and Exhibit B thereto.)

9. Alabama’s most populous congressional district is District 5, which has 603,-726 persons. Accordingly, District 5 varies from the “ideal” population by 26,499 persons, or 4.59%. Alabama’s least populous congressional district is District 6, which has 532,748 persons. Accordingly, District 6 varies from the “ideal” population by 44,479 persons, or 7.71%. The difference between the populations of the most populous and least populous districts is 70,978 persons, which constitutes a relative overall variance from the ideal population of 12.3%. (Statement of Agreed Facts, Exhibit B.)

10. African-Americans do not constitute a majority in any of Alabama’s existing congressional districts. (Statement of Agreed Facts, Exhibit C.) However, according to the 1990 census data, the African-American population in Alabama is sufficiently compact and contiguous to permit the creation of a congressional district in which 65% or more of the residents are African-Americans. The parties agree that such a district should be created. (Supplemental Stipulation filed January 3, 1992.)

11. On February 8, 1991, the Alabama Legislature received the 1990 census data on magnetic tape from the Bureau of Census, and this information was loaded, as received, into the computer system maintained by the Alabama Legislature’s Permanent Joint Legislative Committee on Reapportionment (“Reapportionment Committee”). The population data in the Reapportionment Committee’s computer data base is the official 1990 census data compiled and released by the Bureau of the Census and is accurate and reliable information for redistricting purposes. (Statement of Agreed Facts.) On July 15, 1991, the Secretary of Commerce advised that there would be no adjustment to the 1990 census figures as originally transmitted to the Alabama Legislature.

12. The total population of each existing congressional district is reflected in Appendix A to this opinion. The total population of each existing congressional district by race is reflected in Appendix B; the total population by race of each of Alabama’s 67 counties is reflected in Appendix C; and the voting age population by race of each of the 67 counties is reflected in Appendix D. The names, dates when first elected, and home addresses of Alabama’s incumbent congressmen are reflected in Appendix E.

13. On April 2, 1991, the Reapportionment Committee adopted a set of guidelines for redistricting. (Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1; deposition of Marilyn Terry, pp. 24-25.) The Guidelines set forth a fair set of criteria for congressional redistricting. In addition to mandating compliance with population equality or the “one-person, one-vote” rule and the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, these guidelines included the following criteria:

3. All legislative and congressional districts will be composed of contiguous and reasonably compact geography.
4. Where possible, legislative and congressional districts should attempt to preserve communities of interest, including without limitation municipalities and concentrations of blacks and other ethnic minorities, where such efforts do not violate the other stated criteria.
5. Counties should be used as district building blocks where possible, and to the extent consistent with other aspects of these criteria.
a. Where county lines cannot be maintained, district boundaries should follow as closely as practicable the local voting precinct boundary lines in order to minimize voter confusion and cost of election administration.
b. Where voting precinct boundary lines cannot be followed and also meet the geographic guidelines as stated in this section, district lines must follow census block geography in order to maintain the integrity of the statistical analysis.
6. Efforts will be made to preserve cores of existing districts where such efforts are consistent with and do not violate the other criteria stated herein.

14. The Alabama Legislature adjourned its 1991 regular session on July 29, 1991, without enacting a congressional redistricting plan. (Statement of Agreed Facts, Paragraph 13.) It was argued that the Legislature might delay the primaries for congressional elections, allowing it time to adopt and have precleared a constitutional redistricting plan. If that were done, two primaries would have to be held, entailing added cost to the taxpayers.

15. By statute, Alabama’s congressional primaries will be held June 2, 1992. The qualifying deadline for candidates is sixty days prior to the primary, or April 3,1992. In order for a legislatively-enacted congressional redistricting plan to receive the “pre-clearance” from the Justice Department required by § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c, in time for the April 3 qualifying deadline, such a plan should have been submitted to the Justice Department no later than February 3, 1992.

16. Under Alabama law, the calling of special sessions of the Legislature is a discretionary call on the part of the Governor. Ala. Const. Art. V, § 122. The Governor’s answer filed on October 29, 1991, indicated that the Governor did not plan to call a special session of the Legislature for the purposes of redistricting.

17. At the time this case was filed, this court considered it highly unlikely that the legislative process could produce a congressional redistricting plan and have it pre-cleared in time for the 1992 congressional primaries to be held as scheduled. Nothing was presented to this court to indicate that the Legislature would convene for the purpose of adopting a plan of redistricting in time to be precleared for these elections. Nothing was presented to indicate that even if a special session was called for the purpose of considering redistricting, that a successful effort would follow, or that even if the Legislature was allowed to consider the matter after the regular term commenced on February 4, 1992, that a plan would be forthcoming, and if forthcoming, there would be time to have such plan precleared. The court considered this case on a fast track in light of the impending primary. All parties participating in this case were put on notice of this fact.

18. Consequently, the court finds that the only means by which Alabama’s 1992 congressional primaries may be held in a timely manner (other than under the current districting scheme which, for reasons enumerated in the Conclusions of Law, the court rejects) is pursuant to an interim redistricting plan ordered by this court.

19. The parties have submitted six proposed redistricting plans to the court for its consideration: (1) the “Reed Plan,” Plaintiff’s Exhibits 3 and 7; (2) the “Sam Pierce Zero Plan,” Plaintiff’s Exhibits 2 and 6 (hereafter the “Pierce Plan”); (3) the “Hilli-ard Plan,” Intervenors’ Exhibits 3 and 3A; (4) the “Unity Plan,” Intervenors’ Exhibits 1 and 1A; (5) the “Modified Unity Plan,” Intervenors’ Exhibits 2 and 2A; and (6) the “CD25 Plan,” Intervenors’ Exhibits 4 and 4A.

20. Of the six plans submitted, only the Reed Plan was considered in its final form by the Reapportionment Committee. The Pierce Plan, however, is a modification of a plan called the “Larry Dixon Plan” which was considered by the Reapportionment Committee. The Pierce Plan modified the Larry Dixon Plan to some extent, but the basic format is similar. The Legislature of the State of Alabama created an Interim Task Force on Reapportionment by Act # 87-356. By Act $ 90-388 that task force became the staff to the Permanent Committee on Reapportionment of the Alabama Legislature. The task force scheduled a series of public hearings in regard to redistricting matters, and under the instructions given to the Reapportionment Committee, as set forth in the Guidelines for Legislative and Congressional Redistricting, the Reapportionment Committee meetings and public hearings were open to the public and all plans presented to the Reapportionment Committee were to be made available to the public for its input. These public meetings were held in accordance with the schedule outlined in the appendix to the motion to dissolve filed by Evans (Tab $ 14). Among those plans considered by the Reapportionment Committee, and one that apparently was to be presented to the Legislature, was the Larry Dixon Plan.

The Reapportionment Committee conducting the hearings was made up both African-Americans and Whites. Public input to the Reapportionment Committee in regard to the respective plans was from both African-Americans and Whites.

21. Neither The Pierce Plan nor the Larry Dixon Plan was adopted by the Alabama Legislature.

22. We take judicial notice of the fact that the Legislature has since adopted a plan which substantially differs from any plan that was submitted to this court. We also note the fact that the adopted Plan has neither been precleared by the Justice Department nor approved by the District Court for the District of Columbia.

23. Only two of the plans submitted— the Pierce Plan and the Reed Plan — achieve population equality among the districts.

Under the Pierce Plan two districts contain one person less than the ideal district population of 577,227. Under the Reed Plan, one district has two fewer voters than the ideal. The Hilliard Plan has a total deviation of .71% and an average deviation of .63%. The Modified Unity Plan shows a deviation of 1.6% with an average of .52%. The Unity Plan exhibits a total deviation of 1.15% and an average of .27%. Finally, the CD25 Plan has a deviation of .02%. Deviations in all these plans are not justified by any particular goal or interest.

24. Both the Pierce and Reed Plans contain a district with more than 65% African-American population. Under the Pierce Plan, District 7 contains an African-American population comprising 67.69% of the total residents of that District and 63.58% of that District’s voting age residents. These percentages slightly exceed those in the majority African-American district (District 4) created by the Reed Plan: 66.-69% total population and 62.93% voting age population. (Plaintiff’s Exhibits 2 and 3; TR 15-16.) More significantly, as of December 1990, the African-American percentage of registered voters in the Pierce Plan’s District 7 was 55.55%, which is 3% greater than the African-American percentage of registered voters in the Reed Plan’s District 4.

25. Both the Reed Plan and the Pierce Plan provide African-Americans in Alabama with a substantial majority so as to permit them an opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice. The district in the Pierce Plan is slightly more weighted because it includes higher percentages of African-Americans in total population, voting age population and registered voter population.

26. The Hilliard Plan includes two majority African-American districts, with an African-American population of 59.33% and 61.98% respectively. Although this plan was submitted by the intervenors, they took the position that the Hilliard Plan probably provided obstacles of sufficient nature to cast doubt on their opportunity to elect candidates of their choice in these districts.

27.There are significant differences between the Pierce Plan and the Reed Plan in terms of compactness of their districts. District 1 of the Pierce Plan includes six closely contiguous counties in southwest Alabama, whereas District 1 under the Reed Plan includes Mobile County to the south and Tuscaloosa County to the north. District 2 under the Pierce Plan is largely composed of counties in the southeast corner of the state, while the Reed Plan’s District 2 stretches from Mobile County, in the extreme southwest corner of the State, to Lee County, in east central Alabama. The Pierce Plan is superior to the Reed Plan in terms of compactness.

28. The Pierce Plan maintains the integrity of individual voting precincts to a far greater degree than does the Reed Plan. The Pierce Plan splits only 10 voting precincts statewide, whereas the Reed Plan splits at least 57. (Plaintiff’s Exhibits 2 and 3.) A redistricting plan should minimize precinct splitting when possible because of administrative problems encountered in the conduct of elections when precincts are split.

Furthermore, it is possible to construct a majority African-American district in Alabama using precincts as building blocks.

29. The Pierce Plan splits seven counties. The Reed Plan splits eight counties. The Hilliard Plan splits thirty-one counties.

30. The Pierce Plan also maintains the cores of existing districts to a much greater extent than the Reed Plan. Again, the most striking differences between the plans in this regard are apparent in Districts 1 and 2. There are also significant differences in District 3. The following table reflects the percentage of residents of existing Districts 1, 2, and 3 who remain in those districts under the Pierce and Reed Plans:

District Pierce Reed

1 97.2 64.3

2 86.7 57.0

3 85.2 75.0

31. As a consequence of its apparent disregard for maintaining the cores of existing Districts 1 and 2, the Reed Plan would also separate the incumbent congressmen in those districts from a large percentage of their current constituents. Under the Reed Plan, Congressman Callahan, the incumbent in the present District 1, would be placed in District 2. (Plaintiff’s Exhibit 20.) District 2 under the Reed Plan contains only 25.6% of Congressman Callahan’s existing constituents. Likewise, the Reed Plan would place Congressman Dickinson, the present incumbent in District 2, in District 3 against District 3’s incumbent, Congressman Brow-der. (Plaintiff’s Exhibit 20.) 75.0% of the current residents of District 3 — Congressman Browder’s present constituents — are included in the Reed Plan’s District 3. However, only 19.0% of Congressman Dickinson’s present constituents are included in that District.

32. Another consequence of the Reed Plan’s distortion of Districts 1 and 2 is that the Pierce Plan better preserves the communities of interests in those two districts.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

33. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to the authority contained in 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,1343, 2284 and 42 U.S.C. § 1971 et seq.

34. Congressional redistricting is primarily and foremost a state legislative responsibility. It is therefore with great reluctance that we order an interim plan to become effective for the upcoming 1992 elections. It is out of deference to the Legislature that we have delayed our ruling until this time. In fact, we have afforded it every opportunity to fashion its own plan in order that it could fulfil its responsibility under the Constitution.

35. Unfortunately, the Legislature has not yet precleared its adopted plan so that it can be in place for the impending elections, and we are bound by the Constitution not to permit these elections under the present districts.

36. First and foremost, any court ordered redistricting plan must achieve precise population equality among its districts. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 526, 11 L.Ed.2d 481 (1964); Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526, 89 S.Ct. 1225, 22 L.Ed.2d 519 (1969). This is to ensure that “as nearly as is practicable one man’s vote in a congressional election will be worth as much as another’s.” Wesberry, 376 U.S. at 7-8, 84 S.Ct. at 530. Put another way, Art. I, § 2 prohibits any population deviations among districts in a congressional redistricting plan without proper justification. Kirkpatrick, 394 U.S. at 531, 89 S.Ct. at 1229.

37. Among the plans submitted, only two meet this rigorous standard—the Pierce Plan and the Reed Plan. All the other plans which were submitted have unacceptable deviations. Further, none of the proponents of these plans provide an adequate justification for the deviation and we have “no authority to depart from the constitutional mandate of perfect equality in order to achieve some non-constitutional policy” that we believe will serve the public good. Connor, 431 U.S. at 417, 97 S.Ct. at 1835.

38. If it is possible under constitutional restrictions, a court should consider expressed state policies and preferences. The Reapportionment Committee established guidelines by which to measure a proposed apportionment plan. These guidelines reflect constitutional considerations established by case and statutory law. Any redistricting plan should take into consideration: compactness/contiguity; preservation of political subdivisions; maintenance of communities of interest; and preservation of the core areas of existing districts.

39. Compactness addresses the geographic shape of districts. The most compact district is the district that is configured in the smallest possible area. See Karcher, 462 U.S. at 756-57, 103 S.Ct. at 2673-74. Preservation of political subdivisions promotes efficient representation, empowers a constituency’s ability to organize productively, and serves as a deterrent to partisan gerrymandering. Burton v. Hobbie, 561 F.Supp. 1029, 1035 (M.D.Ala.1983); Ely v. Klahr, 403 U.S. 108, 91 S.Ct. 1803, 29 L.Ed.2d 352 (1971). Protecting communities of interest is meant to keep intact “distinctive units which share common concerns with respect to one or more identifiable features such as geography, demography, ethnicity, culture, socio-eco-nomic status or trade.” Carstens v. Lamm, 543 F.Supp. 68 (D.C.Colo.1982). Preserving cores of existing congressional districts prevents needless modifications and avoids pitting two incumbent congressmen against one another. Karcher, 462 U.S. at 740, 103 S.Ct. at 2663. Based on the findings made above, we conclude that the Pierce Plan better satisfies the above criteria than does the Reed Plan, or any of the other plans.

40. With regard to the majority African-American district, the parties entered into the following stipulation:

According to 1990 data compiled and released by the United States Bureau of the Census, the African American population in the State of Alabama is sufficiently compact and contiguous to comprise a single member significant majority (65% or more) African American Congressional district. Consequently, all parties agree that a significant majority African American Congressional district should be created.

(Supplemental Stipulation dated January 3, 1992.) This stipulation avoided the necessity of the court considering prolonged testimony regarding whether § 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of such a district under the circumstances present in this case. This court will honor the stipulation, and accordingly, will not make an independent determination of whether § 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of a majority African-American congressional district in Alabama at this time. The court has found that the Pierce Plan creates a majority African-American district that provides African-Americans a reasonable opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice, and does so without the need for extensive gerrymandering. The court deems it inappropriate to make a judicial determination relative to what § 2 requires under the circumstances present in this case in light of the stipulation; the parties do not contest the matter and therefore it would be imprudent for the court to address it. This case does not require this court to decide whether the creation of a majority African-American district is mandated by either § 2 or the Constitution and as a matter of judicial restraint we do not undertake to do so.

41. Therefore, having followed the mandate in Karcher, while keeping in mind the desirability of preserving compactness, cores of all districts, communities of interest, and political subdivisions, we adopt the Pierce Plan except to the extent mentioned below.

First, we have discovered no justifiable basis for the fact that the Pierce Plan places Congressman Erdreich and Congressman Harris in the same district. The Supreme Court has recognized the policy of “avoiding contests between incumbent representatives” as a legitimate objective. Karcher, 462 U.S. at 740, 103 S.Ct. at 2663. See also Burton v. Hobbie, 561 F.Supp. at 1035. Accordingly, we have modified the Pierce Plan so that the two congressmen will not be in the same district. Second, in working to achieve zero population deviation and redesign Districts 6 and 7, the affected districts were made marginally more compact in Jefferson and Tuscaloosa counties.

42. The court adopts a redistricting plan to be used in the conduct of congressional elections for the State of Alabama (to be called “The 1992 Alabama Redistricting Plan”) in the event the Alabama Legislature fails to have precleared a redistricting plan in time for the conduct of those elections without delay under applicable state and federal laws. The plan is verbally described in Appendix A to Professor Stanley’s report dated January 22, 1992. (See Order, Doc. #97). Appendix B to that report is a map depicting the plan. The map is appended simply to illustrate the plan, and Appendix A shall control in the event of any conflict between it and Appendix B. Appendix C to that report includes certain statistical data which the court finds to be accurate, none of the parties having posed objections to that data in response to this court’s order.

43. A motion pending seeks a stay of any order by this court adopting a plan pending preclearance. We have reserved ruling on the motion until now. We conclude that there is no requirement that the plan which we now adopt be precleared before it becomes operative.

44. First, the plan that we now adopt is a “court decreed” plan. Connor v. Johnson, 402 U.S. 690, 91 S.Ct. 1760, 29 L.Ed.2d 268 (1971). It is clear that a plan must be precleared only if it is a “legislative plan.” McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 137, 101 S.Ct. 2224, 2229-30, 68 L.Ed.2d 724 (1981). “[T]he essential characteristic of a legislative plan is the exercise of legislative judgment ... [that is], a proposal reflecting the policy choices of the elected representatives of the people_” Id. at 152-53, 101 S.Ct. at 2238. See also 28 C.F.R. § 51.18 (1991) (stating that, in general, “changes affecting voting that are ordered by a federal court are subject to the pre-clearance requirements of section 5 to the extent that they reflect the policy choices of the submitting authority.”).

The plan which this court adopts today is substantially the same as the plan offered by Plaintiff Wesch. Neither he, nor the party he is affiliated with, can claim to be exercising legislative judgment. We are certain that the Pierce Plan does not reflect the policy choices of the elected representative of the people. Cf. McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 101 S.Ct. 2224, 68 L.Ed.2d 724 (1981) (holding that a reapportionment plan submitted to a court by the legislative body of a covered jurisdiction was a legislative plan); Campos v. City of Baytown, Texas, 840 F.2d 1240 (5th Cir.1988) (holding that plan proposed by the city was a legislative plan), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 905, 109 S.Ct. 3213, 106 L.Ed.2d 564 (1989); Farnum v. Burns, 561 F.Supp. 83, 92 (D.R.I.1983) (holding that plan drafted by a legislative consultant under the direction of the legislative body reflected the policy choices of the elected representative and was therefore a legislative plan).

45. Alternatively, it appears that the Legislature will not have a plan precleared in time to be in place for the April 3, 1992 qualifying deadline. For that reason, the situation calls for emergency action by this court. The Supreme Court acknowledged this exception to preclearance in Upham v. Seamon, 456 U.S. 37, 44, 102 S.Ct. 1518, 1522-23, 71 L.Ed.2d 725 (1982):

It is true that we have authorized District Courts to order or to permit elections to be held pursuant to apportionment plans that do not in all respects measure up to the legal requirements, even constitutional requirements. Necessity has been the motivating factor in these situations, (citations omitted).

The Court later reaffirmed this exception in McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 153 n. 35, 101 S.Ct. 2224, 2238 n. 35, 68 L.Ed.2d 724 (1981), noting the ample power of the district courts to fashion interim plans. See also Burton v. Hobbie, 561 F.Supp. at 1036 (recognizing the authority of a court to implement an interim plan so that an election can be held); 28 C.F.R. § 51.18(c) (1991) (acknowledging a federal court’s authority to approve a plan without preclearance: “A federal court’s authorization of the emergency interim use without pre-clearance of a voting change does not exempt from section 5 review any use of the practice not explicitly authorized by the court.”).

For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is Denied.

46. We find that, at a minimum, district lines should become fixed one week prior to the April 3, 1992 qualifying date for candidates to allow both candidates and election officials the necessary time to evaluate them and choose their future conduct accordingly.

CONCLUSION

Congressional redistricting is a state legislature’s fundamental task, but it becomes a judicial duty when a legislature fails to adopt and preclear a plan after having adequate opportunity to do so.

At the time this opinion is released, it is reported, although evidence of such is not before the court, that the Alabama legislature has passed a redistricting plan. It is also reported that the plan has not received preclearance by the Attorney General of the United States under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Since this court recognizes that congressional redistricting is properly a matter to be determined by the legislature and that the federal courts should intervene only if the legislature fails to act in a constitutional manner, the question arises: Why should the court not consider the legislature’s belatedly adopted plan and, if it is found by the court to comply with constitutional and legal requirements, adopt this expression of the legislative will as the court’s plan and order it into effect immediately? The answer is that this court has no legal authority to do so.

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act requires a legislative plan to be submitted to the Attorney General for approval before it can be put into effect. The Attorney General has a period of 60 days to study the plan and express any objections he might have to it or to any of its provisions.

The Supreme Court has made clear that this requirement of the Voting Rights Act cannot be put aside by having a legislative plan approved by a federal district court (other than the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia). McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. at 130, 101 S.Ct. at 2224; United States v. Board of Supervisors, 429 U.S. 642, 97 S.Ct. 833, 51 L.Ed.2d 106 (1977).

Thus, if we adopted the reported legislative plan, it would still be subject to the preclearance requirement, which might well require postponement of the primaries. This we are unwilling to do.

It should be clearly understood that this court does not wish to compete with the state legislature as to where congressional district lines should be drawn. It is, however, our responsibility to ensure that the voters of this state have the opportunity to choose their members of Congress from constitutionally drawn districts when elections are held at the time set by state law.

If the plan reportedly adopted by the legislature should be precleared by some expedited method no later than 12:00 noon, Central Time, March 27, 1992, one week before the statutory deadline for candidates to qualify to run, as set out herein, then that plan will take effect and those will be the congressional districts for the 1992 election. Otherwise, the legislature will have defaulted in its obligation to the people of the state and the plan described herein will take effect.

The plan adopted by this court shall become operative and controlling for the 1992 congressional elections. Additionally, it shall govern the conduct of congressional elections after 1992 unless and until the Legislature for the State of Alabama adopts a plan and has it precleared in time for such elections to proceed without delay under applicable law.

The court will by separate document enter judgment consistent with this opinion.

FINAL JUDGMENT

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows:

1. It is declared that Ala.Code § 17-20-1 (1987), as it read prior to its amendment in 1992, if applied to congressional elections in 1992, violates Art. I, § 2 of the United States Constitution.

2. The defendants, individually, and their successors, agents, employees, attorneys, and those persons otherwise acting in concert or in participation with them who receive actual notice of this order, are ENJOINED from:

(a) conducting congressional elections in the State of Alabama under the districting plan heretofore established by Ala.Code § 17-20-1 (1987) as that section read prior to its 1992 amendment;

(b) failing to conduct congressional elections in 1992 in accordance with a redistricting plan adopted by this court and called “The 1992 Alabama Redistricting Plan,” which is verbally described in Appendix A to this order. [Page 1512.] Appendix B to this order is a map depicting the plan. [Page 1582.] (The map. is appended simply to illustrate the plan, and Appendix A shall control in the event of any conflict between it and Appendix B). Provided, however, that the injunction contained in this paragraph (b) shall not be effective if the Alabama Legislature duly enacts a redistricting plan for the conduct of congressional elections in 1992 and has the same precleared no later than 12:00 noon, Central Time, March 27, 1992; and

(c) failing to conduct congressional elections in calendar years after 1992 in accordance with the 1992 Alabama Redistricting Plan described in paragraph (b) above. Provided, however, that the injunction contained in this paragraph (c) shall not be effective in the event the Alabama Legislature duly enacts a redistricting plan and has the same precleared in accordance with federal law in time for congressional elections to proceed without delay under then applicable state and federal law.

All the Judges concur.

APPENDIX A

DB: ALABAMA District Statistics Total Populations. All Ages Plan: Cong. Districts Gumby Date: 11/21/91 Time: 12:11 p.m. Page: 1

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS District Number Total Ideal District % District

Name Members Population Population Variance Variance

District 1 593,911 577,227 16,684 2.89%

District 2 560.423 577,227 -7,804 -1.35%

District3 ' 565,135

District 4 573,868 577.227

District S 603.726 377.227 26.499 4.59%

District6 532.748 577.227 -14,479 -7.71%

District 7 601,776 577.227 24,549 425%

Total 4,040.587 4,040.589 -2 0.00%

PLANWIDE STATISTICS:

Range of populations: 532,748 to 603.726

Ratio tange: 1.1332

Absolute range: -44,479 to 26,499

Absolute overall range: 70,978

Relative range: -7.71t©4.59%

Relative overall range: 1230%

Absolute mean deviation: 193S229

Relative mean deviation: 335%

Standard deviation: 23237.8677

APPENDIX B

DB: ALABAMA District Summary Total Populations. All Ages Plan: Cong. Districts Gumby Date: 11/21/91 Time: 12:12 p.m. 1

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

District Name Total Total Total Pod. White Black Total Total Total Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other

District 1 593,911 408,778 175,531 100.00% 68.83% 29.56% 4,951 3,786 865 0.83% 0.64% 0.15%'

i District 2 569,423 381,279 182,021 100.00% 66.96% 31.97% 1,593 3,285 1,245 028% 0.58% 022%

District 3 565.135 403.218 156.724 100.00% 71.35% 27.73% 1,133 3.132 928 020% 0.55% 0.16%

District 4 573.868 530,503 40,004 100.00% 92.44% 6.97% 1,647 1.063 651 029% 0.19% 0.11%

District 5 603,726 503,616 88,353 100.00% 83.42% 14.63% 5,505 5,158 1,094 0.91% 0.85% 0.18%

District 6 532.748 331.711 196,872 100.00% 62.26% 36.95% 730 2,936 499 0.14% 0.55% 0.09%

District 7 601,776 416,692 181,200 100.00% 69.24% 30.11% 947 2,437 500 0.16% 0.40% 0.08%

Total 4,040,587 2,975.797 1,020,705 100.00% 73.65% 25.26% 16,506 21,797 5,782 041% 0.54% 0.14%

District Summary DB: ALABAMA Total Populations, All Ages Plan: Cong. Districts

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

District Name Total Pop. Total White Total Total Black Am. Inti. Total Asian/PI Total Other

District 1 593,911 408,778 175,531 4,951 3,786 865

District 2 569,423 381,279 182,021 1,593 3,285 1,245

District 3 565,135 403,218 156,724 1,133 3,132 928

District 4 573,868 530,503 40,004 1,647 1,063 651

District 5 603,726 503,616 88,353 5,505 5,158 1,094

District 6 532,748 331,711 196,872 730 2,936 499

District 7 601,776 416,692 181,200 947 2,437 500

APPENDIX C

RE/*""lONMENT OFFICE i! .-JÍK UNION, ROOM 811 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36130 (205) 242-7941

DB: AlABAHA Attributes of Census Units Date: 6/11/91 Uithin Alabama lime: 9:53 a.ffi. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 1

Census Unit Total Pop. Total ghite Total Black Total Asian/PI Total Other

Autauga County 34,222 100.002 27,144 7.9.32Z 6,845 20.00Z 120 0.35Z 42 0.12Z

Baldwin County 98,280 100.00Z 84,565 86.04Z 12,640 12.86Z 221 0.22Z 224 0.23Z

Barbour County 25,417 100.OOZ 14,118 55.55Z 11,194 44.04Z 44 0.17Z 15 0.06Z

Bibb County 16,576 100.00Z 13,052 78.74Z 3,478 20.98Z 11 0.07Z 10 0.06Z

Blount County 39,248 100.OOZ 38,397 97.83Z 521 1.33Z 33 0.08Z 164 0.42Z

Bullock County 11,042 100.00Z 3,036 27.50Z 7,986 72.32Z 10 0.09Z 2 0.02Z

Butler County 21,892 100.00Z 13,049 59.61Z 8,798 40.19Z 19 0.09Z 2 0.01Z

Calhoun County 116,034 100.00Z 92,873 80.04Z 21,578 18.60Z 869 0.75Z 418 0.36Z

Chambers County 36,876 100.00Z 23,575 63.93Z 13,221 35.85Z 13 0.04Z 26 0.07Z

Cherokee County 19,543 100.00Z 18,154 92.89Z 1,291 6.61Z 24 0.12Z 23 0.12Z

Chilton County 32,458 100.OOZ 28,647 88.26Z 3,674 11.32Z 38 0.12Z 36 0.11Z

Choctav County 16,018 100.00Z 8,913 SS.64Z 7,077 44.18Z 12 0.07Z 6 0.04Z

Clarke County 27.240 100.OOZ 15,527 57.00Z 11,625 42.68Z 35 0.13Z 8 0.03Z

Clay County 13,252 100.OOZ 11,044 83.34Z 2,166 16.34Z 13 0.10Z 6 0.05Z

Cleburne County 12,730 100.00Z 12,084 94.93Z 587 4.61Z 13 0.10Z 26 0.20Z

Coffee County 40.240 100.00Z 32,702 81.27Z 6,917 17.19Z 317 0.79Z 141 0.3SZ

Colbert County 51,666 100.OOZ 42,820 82.88Z 8,568 16.58Z 93 0.18Z 48 0.09Z

Conecuh County 14,054 100.00Z 8,063 57.37Z 5,925 42.16Z 13 0.09Z 10 0.07Z

Coosa County 11,063 100.00Z 7,242 65.46Z 3,782 34.19Z 4 0.04Z 1 0.01Z

Covington County 36,478 100.OOZ 31,551 86.49Z 4,777-13.10Z 48 0.13X 30 0.08Z

Crenshaw County 13,635 100.00Z 10,048 73.69Z 3,544 25.99Z 11 0.08Z 5 0.04Z

Cullman County 67,613 100.00Z 66,744 98.71Z 560 0.83Z 117 0.17Z 58 0.09Z

Dale County 49,633 100.00Z 39,365 79.31Z 8,847 17.82Z • 731 1.47Z 451 0.91Z

Dallas County 48,130 100.00Z 20,121 41.81Z 27,825 S7.81Z 129 0.27Z 14 0.03Z

REAPPORTIONMENT CfFJGE ¡1 SOUTH UNION, ROOM 81! f "MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA #6» (205)242-794)

DB: ALABAMA Attributes of Census Units Date: 6/11/91 Bithin Alabama Time: 9:53 a.o. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 2

Census Unit Total Pon. Total Bhlte Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Detalb County 100.OOZ 52,980 96.94Z 1.88Z 0.88Z 0.14Z 0.16Z

Elmore County 49,210 100.00Z 37,850 76.92Z 11,039 22.43Z 137 0.28Z 129 0.26Z 55 0.11Z

Escambia County 35,518 100.00Z 24,326 68.49Z 10,046 28.28Z 1,047 2.95Z 58 0.16Z 41 0.12Z

Etovah County 99,840 100.00Z 85,274 85.41Z 13,799 13.82Z 250 0.25Z 419 0.42Z 98 0.10Z

Fayette County 17,962 100.00Z 15,717 87.50Z 2,190 12.19Z 9 0.05Z 19 0.11Z 27 0.15Z

Franklin County 27,814 100.00Z 26,463 95.14Z 1,249 4.49Z 57 0.20Z 35 0.13Z 10 0.04Z

Geneva County 23,647 100.00Z 20,682 87.46Z 2,824 11.94Z 93 0.39Z 15 0.06Z 33 0.14Z

Greene County 10;153 100.OOZ 1,966 19.36Z 8,181 80.58Z 3 0.03Z 0 0.00Z 3 0.03Z

Hale County 15,498 100.00Z 6,255 40.36Z 9,214 59.4SZ 20 0.13Z 9 0.06Z 0 0.00Z

Henry County 15,374 100.00Z 9,918 64.51Z 5,395 35.09Z 31 0.20Z 6 0.04Z 24 . 0.16Z

Houston County 81,331 100.00Z 61,513 75.63Z 18,954 23.30Z 287 0.35Z 470 0.58Z 107 0.13Z

Jackson County 47,796 100.OOZ 44,696 93.51Z 1,968 4.12Z 1,020 2.13Z 90 0.19Z 22 O.OSZ

Jefferson County 651,525 100.00Z 418,317 64.21Z 228,521 35.07Z 889 0.14Z 3,222 0.49Z 576 0.09Z

Lamar County 15,715 100.00Z 13,805 87.85Z 1,862 11.8SZ 24 0.'15Z 10 0.06Z 14 0.09Z

Lauderdale County 79,661 100.00Z 71,560 89.83Z 7,695 9.66Z 165 0.21Z 196 0.25Z 45 0.06Z

Laurence County 31,513 100.00Z 24,563 77.9SZ 4,798 15.23Z 2,124 6.74Z 19 0.06Z 9 0.03Z

Lee County 87,146 100.00Z 64,889 74.46Z 20,407 23.42Z 132 0.15Z 1,584 1.82Z 134 0.15Z

Limestone County 54,135 100.OOZ 46,658 86.19Z 7,127 13.17Z 148 0.27Z 158 0.29Z 44 0.08Z

Lovndes County 12,658 100.OOZ 3,185 25.16Z 9,456 74.70Z 10 0.08Z 4 0.03Z 3 0.02Z

Hacon County 24,928 100.00Z 3,443 13.81Z 21,340 85.61Z 24 0.10Z 99 0.40Z 22 0.09Z

Hadison County 238,912 100.00Z 184,197 77.10Z 48,116 20.14Z 1,601 0.67Z 4,232 1.77Z 766 0.32Z

Marengo County 23,084 100.00Z 11,314 49.01Z 11,745 50.88Z 11 O.OSZ 11 O.OSZ 3 0.01Z

Marion County 29,830 100.OOZ 28,759 96.41Z 967 3.24Z 57 0.19Z 35 0.12Z 12 0.04Z

Marshall County 70,832 100.OOZ 69,361 97.92Z 1,087 1.53Z 231 0.33Z 111 0.16Z 42 0.06Z

REAPPORTIONMENT OFFICE 11 SOUTH UNION, ROOM 811 MSNTOOMSnVALMAAM 861» (206)242^941

DB: A1ABAHA Attributes of Census Units Date: 6/11/91 Within Alabama Time: 9:53 a.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 3

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Mobile County 378,643 100.002 254,853 67.312 117,872 31.132 1,940 0.512 3,398 0.902 580 0.152

Monroe County 23,968 100.002 14,320 59.752 9,372 39.102 215 0.902 54 0.232 7 0.032

Montgomery County 209,085 100.002 119,420 57.122 87,312 41.762 414 0.202 1,533 0.732 406 0.192

Morgan County 100,043 100.002 89.122 89.082 10,081 10.082 310 0.312 370 0.372 160 0.162

Perry County 12,759 100.002 4,503 35.292 8,219 64.422 16 0.132 14 0.112 7 0.0S2

Pickens County 20,699 100.002 12,002 57.982 8,645 41.772 24 0.122 27 0.132 1 0.002

Pike County 27.59S 100.002 17,814 64.562 9,548 34.602 146 0.532 68 0.252 19 0.072

Randolph County 19,881 100.002 15.138 76.142 4,686 23.572 29 0.152 21 0.112 7 0.042

Russell County 46,860 100.002 28,473 60.762 18,088 38.602 90 0.192 117 0.252 92 0.202

St. Clair County 50,009 100.002 45.138 90.262 4,561 9.122 136 0.272 77 0.152 97 0.192

Shelby County 99,358 100.002 90,715 91.302 7,718 7.772 264 0.272 575 0.582 86 0.092

County 16,174 100.002 4,759 29.422 11,369 70.292 6 0.042 30-0.192 10 0.062

Talladega County 74,107 100.002 50,970 68.782 22.773 30.732 174 0.232 113 0.152 77 0.102

Tallapoosa County 38,826 100.002 28,493 73.392 10,212 26.302 62 0.162 37 0.102 22 . 0.062

150,522 100.002 109,398 72.682 39,377 26.162 253 0.172 1,264 0.842 230 0.152

County 67,670 100.002 63,042 93-162 4,405 6.512 84 0.122 107 0.162 32 0.052

Washington County 16,694 100.002 10,984 65.802 4,623 27.692 1,068 6.402 14 0.082 5 0.032

Wilcox County 13,568 100.002 4,203 30.982 9,353 68.932 6 0.042 6 0.042 0 0.002

Vinston County 22,053 100.002 21,925 99.422 57 0.262 42 0.192 26 0.122 3 0.012

4,040,587 100.002 2,975,797 73.652 1,020,705 25.262 16,506 0.412 21,797 0.542 5,782 0.142

APPENDIX D

REAPPORTIONMENT OFFICE i ~ 11 SOUTH UNION, ROOM 8)1 "“■', MONTGOMERY, AIMMA MIX) ” (209)24»MI

DB: ALABAMA Attributes of Census Units Date: 7/31 Vithin Alabama Time: 2:41p.m. Etlmic Breakdown of Voting Age Populations Page: 1

Census Unit Total Vot. Age Vot. Age Vot. Age Vot. .Age Vot. Age Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other Vhlte Vot. Age

Autauga County 19,593 57.251 4,366 48 12.76Z 0.14Z 90 2 0.26Z 0.08 24,124 70.49Z

Baldwin County 64,059 65.18Z 7,938 459 8.08Z 0.47Z 159 13 0.16Z 0.13 72,747 74.02Z

Barbour County 10,744 42.27Z 7.130 36 28.05Z 0.14Z 30 1 0.12Z 0.05 17,953 70.63Z

Bibb County 9,617 58.02Z 2,138 16 12.90Z 0.10Z 8 0.05Z 0.02 11,783 71.08Z

Blount County 28,615 72.91Z 366 94 0.93Z 0.24Z 24 11 0.06Z 0.29 29,212 74.43Z

Bullock County 2,513 22.76Z 5.131 7 46.47Z 0.06Z 8 0.07Z 0.02 7,661 69.38Z

Butler County 9,919 45.31Z 5,357 IS 24.47Z 0.07Z 9 0.04Z 0.00 15,301 69.89Z

Calhoun County 71,217 61.38Z 14,702 241 12.67Z 0.21Z 603 29 0.52Z 0.25 87,056 75.03Z

Chambers County 18,499 50.17Z 8,685 30 23.55Z 0.08Z 10 2 0.03Z 0.05 27,244 73.88Z

Cherokee County 13.881 71.03Z 898 39 4.59Z . 0.20Z 18 1 0.09Z 0.08 14,851 75.99Z

Chilton County 21,320 65.68Z 2,361 47 7.27Z 0.14Z 24 1 O.07Z 0.06 23,771 73.24Z

Choctaw County 6,700 41.83Z 4,592 7 28.67Z 0.04Z 8 0.05Z 0.02 11,310 70.61Z

Clarke County 11,684 42.89Z 7,346 29 26.97Z Q.11Z 22 0.08Z 0.01 19,085 70.06Z

Clay County 8,497 64.12Z 1,407 16 10.62Z 0.12Z 10 0.08Z 0.03 9,934 74.96Z

Cleburne County 8,983 70.57Z 388 IS 3.05Z 0.12Z 11 2 0.09Z 0.16 9,418 73.98Z

Coffee County 24.882 61.83Z 4,577 118 11.37Z 0.29Z 234 10 0.58Z 0.25 29,913 74.34Z

Colbert County ■33,112 64.09Z 5,825 96 11.27Z 0.19Z 54 3 0.10Z. 0.06 39,118 75.71Z

Conecuh County 6,278 44.67Z 3,815 27 27.15Z • 0.19Z 11 0.08Z 0.04 10,136 72.12Z

Coosa County 5,579 50.43Z 2,576 21 23.28Z 0.19Z 4 0.04Z 0.01 8,181 73.95Z

Covington County 24,039 65.90Z 3,086 56 8.46Z 0.15Z 32 2 0.09Z ' 0.08 27,241 74.68Z

Crenshaw County 7,613 5S.83Z 2,345. 22 17.20Z 0.16Z 7 0.05Z 0.03 9,991 73.27Z

Cullman County 49,994 74.84Z 73.94Z 386 98 0.57Z 0.14Z 80 4 0.12Z 0.06 50.601

Dale County 35,757 29,228 72.04Z 58.89Z 5,529 184 11.14Z 0.37Z 518 29 1.04Z 0.60

Dallas County 33,025 15,449 68.62Z 32.10Z 17,445 32 36.25Z 0.07Z 91 0.19Z 0.02

DB: ALABAHA Attributes of Census Units Date: 7/31 Within Alabama Time: 2:41 p.m. Ethnic Breakdown of Voting Age Populations Page: 2

.Census Unit Total Vot. Age Vot. Age Vot. Age Vot. Age White Black Am. Ind. Vot. Age Vot. Age Asian/PI Other

DeKalb County 40,744 39,666 74.552 72.58% 694 283 1.27Z 0.52Z 43 ■ 5 0.08% 0.11

Elmore County 36,418 28,496 74.01% 57.91Z 7,696 105 15.64Z 0.21Z 87 3 0.18% 0.07

26,051 18,450 73.35Z 51.95Z 6,840 703 19.26Z 1.98Z 32 2 0.09% 0.07

75,251 65,349 75.37Z 65.45Z 9,299 182 9.31Z 0.18Z 353 6 0.35% 0.07

Fayette County 13,360 11,801 74.38Z 65.70% 1,523 6 8.48% 0.03Z 11 1 0.06% 0.11

Franklin County 20,910 19,978 75.18Z 71.83Z 867 39 3.12Z 0.14Z 19 0.07% 0.03

17,757 15,821 75.09Z 66.90Z 1,837 71 7.77Z 0.30Z 12 1 0.05% 0.07

6,811 1,641 67.08Z 16.16Z 5,165 3 50.87Z 0.03Z • 0 0.00% 0.02

County 10,616 4,772 68.50Z 30.79Z 5,829 11 37.61Z 0.07Z 4

Henry County 11,273 7,667 73.33Z 49.87% 3,561 24 23.16Z • 0.16Z 6 1 0.04%

Houston County 58,858 46,249 72.37Z 56.87Z 12,041 214 14.80Z 0.26Z 288 6 0.35% 0.08

35,482 33,503 74.24Z 70.10Z 1,342 563 2.81Z 1.18% 57 1 0.12% 0.04

488,937 328,268 75.05Z 50.38Z 157,208 697 24.13% 0.11% 2,359 40 0.36% 0.06

Lamar County 11,725 10,434 74.61Z 66.40Z 1,253 17 7.97% 0.11% 10 1 0.06%

County 60,580 55,008 76.05Z ■ 69.05Z 5,275 128 6.62% 0.16% 137 3

22,874 18,702 72.59Z 59-.35Z 3,095 1,061 9.82% 3.37% 12 0.04% 0.01

68,058 52,769 78.10Z 60.55Z 13,846 108 15.89% 0.12% 1,226 10 1.41% ■

40,529 35,087 74.87Z 64.81Z 5,197 113 9.60% 0.21% 101 3 0.19% 0.06

8,263 2,513 65.28Z 19.S5Z 5,742 4 45.36% 0.03%' 3 0.02% 0.01

County Hadison 18,286 2,780 73.36Z 11.15Z 15,397 18 61.77% 0.07% 74 1 0.30% 0.07 •

75.41Z 59.51Z 945 14.04% 0.40% • 2,999 49 1-26% 0.21

16,091 8,524 69.71Z 36.93Z 7,550 10 32.71% 0.04% 7 0.03% 0.00

Marion County 22,508 21,733 75.45Z 72.86Z 712 33 2.39% 0.11% 23 0.08%

53,366 52,343 75.34Z 73.90Z 766 •• 161 1.08% 0.23% 76 2 0.11% 0.03

DB: ALABAHA Attributes of Census Units Date: 7/31 Within Alabama Time: 2:41p.m. Ethnic Breakdown of Voting Age Populations Page: 3

Census Unit . Total Vot. Age Vot. Age White Vot. Age Black Vot. Age Am. Ind. Vot. Age Asian/Pl Vot. Age Other

Hobile County 270,610 71.472 190,842 50.402 75,791 20.022 1,286 0.342 2,279 0.602 41 0.11

Honroe County 16,590 69.222 10,597 44.212 5,806 24.222 152 0.632 31 0.132 0.02

Montgomery County 151,701 72.552 92,603 44.292 57,450 27.482 303 0.142 1,072 0.512 27 0.13

Horgan County 74,027 74.002 66,930 66.902 6,538 6.542 208 0.212 244 0.242 10 0.11

Perry County 8,757 68.632 3,719 29.152 5,009 39.262 9 0.072 14 0.112 0.05

Pickens County 14,805 71.532 9,369 45.262 5,401 26.092 17 0.082 17 0.082 0.00

Pike County 20,729 75.122 14,208 51.492 6,348 23.002 92 0.332 63 0.232 1 0.07

Randolph County 14,696 73.922 11,650 58.602 3,012 15.152 19 0.102 12 0.062 0.02

Russell County 34,380 73.372 21,762 46.442 12,396 26.452 67 0.142 95 0.202 6 0.13

St. Clair County 36,699 73.382 33,259 66.512 3,230 6.462 106 0.212 51 0.102 5 0.11

Shelby County 72,167 72.632 66,406 66.842 5,147 5.182 179 0.18% 379 0.382 5 0.06

Sumter County 11,202 69.262 3,869 23.922 7,291 45.082 5 0.032 28 0.172 0.06

Talladega County 53,614 72.352 38,551 52.022 14,805 19.982 129 0.172 79 0.112 5 0.07

Tallapoosa County 28,899 74.432 22,100 56.922 6,718 17.302 41 0.112 25 0.062 1 0.04

Tuscaloosa County 114,857 76.312 86,831 57.692 26,623 17.691 195 0.132 1,022 0.682 18 0.12

Walker County 50,560 74.722 47,546 70-.262 2,847 4.212 67 0.102 79 0.122 2 0.03

Washington County 11,611 69.552 8,033 48.122 2,916 17.472 645 3.862 12 0.072 0.03

Wilcox County 8,956 66.012 3,' 297 24.302 5,649 41.632 6 0.042 4 0.032 0.00

Winston Comity 16,621 75.372 16,530 74.962 38 0.17% 31 0.142 19 0.092 0.01

Total Alabama 2,981,799 73.802 2,273,845 56.282 677,681 16.772 10,809 0.272 15,529 0.382 3,93 0.10

APPENDIX E

District Name/Address Census Residence

1 Sonny Callahan (R) Mobile County 3251 Riviere Du Chien Drive Tract 20 Mobile, AL Block 231 Voting District #0360

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1984

2 Bill Dickinson (R) 2350 Woodley Road Montgomery, AL Montgomery County Tract 20 Block 311 Voting District #0180

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1964

3 Glen Browder (D) 517 Pelham Street, North Jacksonville, AL Calhoun County Tract 21 Block 510 Voting District #0010

FIRST ELECTED: APRIL, 1989

4 Tom Bevill (D) 1600 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL Walker County Tract 203 Block 173 Voting District #0010

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1989

5 Bud Cramer (D) 417 Eustis Street Huntsville, AL Madison County Tract 1 Block 234 Voting District #0060

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1982

6 Ben Erdreich (D) >. Jefferson County 2625 Highland Avenue, South Tract 47.01 Birmingham, AL Block 723 Voting District #5408

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1982

7 Clause Harris (D) 3121 Azalea Lane East (41st Avenue) Tuscaloosa, AL Tuscaloosa County Tract 123.01 Block 143 Voting District #0160

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER 1986

APPENDIX A TO FINAL JUDGMENT

“Units Assigned to a District”

The following description lists the census geographical units (as contained within the State computer’s reapportiomnent data base) composing each congressional district. When a county is entirely within a congressional district the county and its population are listed as a single line. For the seven counties split by congressional district lines, the county name is listed without population figures and subsequent lines give voting precincts and population figures for each precinct in that county. For the ten voting precincts split by congressional district lines, the name of the precinct is listed without population figures, followed by lines listing the census tract, the census block group number, and then the census block within each tract and block group, with population figures. Lines at the end of each block group, tract, precinct, or county listing give summary population totals for that unit in the particular congressional district.

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 1 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m.

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Total Total

Baldwin County 98,280 100.00% 84,565 86.04% 12,640 12.86% 630 0.64% 221 0.22% 224 0.23%

Clarke County CARLTON/GAINESTOWN/CHOCTAW 2,018 100.00% 319 15.81% 1,694 83.94% 1 0.05% 3 0.15% 1 0.05%

3,606 100.00% 1,567 43.46% 2,025 56.16% 13 0.36% 0 0.00% 1 0.03%

WALKER SPRINGS 586 100.00% 263 44.88% • 319 54.44% 4 0.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

ALLEN 391 100.00% 22 5.63% 369 94.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

MCVAY/PARKERTOWN/IACKSON 4,405 100.00% 3,580 81.27% 807 18.32% 6 0.14% 9 0.20% 3 0.07%

SALITPA

Tract 9579

Block Group 1 Block 109 0 0 ■ O' 0 0

Block 110 0 0 0 0 0

Block Ill 0 0 0 0 0

Block 112 0 0 0 •0 0 *

Block 113 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 114 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 115 103 100.00% 63 61.17% 40 38.83% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 116 23 100.00% 7 30.43% 16 69.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 117 52 100.00% 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 118 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 119 95 100.00% 95 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 121 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 144 0 0 0 0 0

Block 145 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 1 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 2

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Water block I99B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 .0 0

Water block 199D 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199F 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199G 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 1 294 165 129 100.00% 56.12% 43.88% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 8

Block 801 25 100.00% 88.00% 12.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 802 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 803 27 0 ‘ 27 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 804 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 899D 0.0 0 0 0 0

Water block 899E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 8 52 22 30 100.00% 42.31% 57.69% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9579 346 187 159 100.00% 54.05% 45.95% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total SALITPA 346 187 159 100.00% 54.05% 45.95% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WINN/ZIMCO

Tract 9577

Block Group 2 Block 230 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 231 58 13 45 0 0 0

100.00% 22.41% 77.59% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 1 Total Populations. All Age? Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 3

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 232 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Water block 299A 0 0 0

Total Block Group 2 59 100.00% 13 22.03% 46 77.97% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 9577 59 13 100.00% 22.03% 46 77.97% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 6

Block 612 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Block Group 6 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 7

Block 707 16 100.00% 6 10 37.50% 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 708 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 7 16 100.00% • 6 37.50% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 9578 21 11 100.00% 52.38% 10 47.62% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Tract 9579

Block Group 1

Block 101 0 0 0 0

Block 102 15 10 5 0 0

Block 103 100.00% 66.67% 0 0 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Block 107 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 123 59 100.00% 20 33.90% 38 64.41% 1 1.69% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 124 167 100.00% 45 26.95% 122 73.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 1 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m.

Plan type; CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Black Total Total Am. Ind. Astan/PI Total Other

Block 125 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 126 • 156 100.00% 11 7.05% 145 92.95% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 127 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 128 0 0 0

Block 130 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 131 7 100.00% 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 132 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 133 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 134 4 100.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 135 59 100.00% 26 44.07% 33 55.93% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 136 25 100.00% 18 72.00% 7 28.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Water block 199H 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 1 500 100.00% 144 28.80% 355 71.00% 1 0.20% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 9579 500 100.00% 144 28.80% 355 71.00% 1 0.20% 0 0.00% . o 11 0.00%

Total WINN/ZIMCO 580 100.00% 168 28.97% 411 70.86% 1 0.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

GROVE HILL/WHATLEY/GREENWOOD/HELLW 3,835 100.00% 2,408 62.79% 1,421 37.05% 0 0.00%

GROVE HILL CITY HALL 1,551 100.00% 976 62.93% 560 36.11% 7 0.45% 0.52% 0 0.00%

NEW PROSPECT/CHILTON 274 100.00% 274 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

LIBERTY 269 100.00% 256 95.17% 13 4.83% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

BASNI 403 100.00% 338 83.87% 61 15.14% 0 0.00% 1 0.25% 3 0.74%

THOMASVELLE 5,859 ' 100.00% 3,787 64.64% 2,056 35.09% 9 0.15% 7 0.12% 0 0.00%

Total Clarke County 24,123 100.00% 14,145 58.64% 9,895 41.02% 44 0.18% 31 0.13% 8 0.03%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 1 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 5

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Escambia County 35,518 24,326 10,046 100.00% 68.49% 28.28% 1,047 58 41 2.95% 0.16% 0.12%

Mobile County 378,643 254,853 117,872 100.00% 67.31% 31.13% 1,940 3.398 580 0.51% 0.90*% 0.15%

Monroe County 23,968 14,320 9,372 100.00% 59.75% 39.10% 215 54 7 0.90% 0.23% 0.03%

Washington County 16,694 10,984 4,623 100.00% 65.80% 27.69% 1,068 14 5 6.40% 0.08% 0.03%

Total District 1 577,226 403,193- 164,448 100.00% 69.85% • 28.49% 4,944 3,776 865 0.86% 0.65% 0.15%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRJCT Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 District 2 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 6

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Total Black Am. Ind. Total Total Asian/PI Other

Autauga County 34,222 27,144 100.00% 79.32% 6,845 71 20.00% 0.21% 120 42 0.35% 0.12%

Barbour County 25,417 14,118 100.00% 55.55% 11,194 46 44.04% 0.18% 44 15 0.17% 0.06%

Bullock County 11,042 3,036 100.00% 27.50% 7,986 8 72.32% 0.07% 10 2 0.09% 0.02%

Butler County 21,892 13,049 100.00% 59.61% 8,798 24 40.19% 0.11% 19 2 0.09% 0.01%

Coffee County 40,240 32,702 100.00% 81.27% 6,917 163 17.19% 0.41% 317 141 0.79% 0.35%

Conecuh County 14,054 8,063 100.00% 57.37% 5,925 43 42.16% 0.31% 13 10 0.09% 0.07%

Covington County 36,478 31.551 100.00% 86.49% 4,777 72 13.10% 0.20% 48 30 0.13% 0.08%

Crenshaw County 13,635 10,048 100.00% 73.69% 3,544 27 25.99% 0.20% 11 5 0.08% 0.04%

Dale County 49,633 39,365 100.00% 79.31% 8,847 239 17.82% 0.48% 731 451 1.47% '0.91%

Elmore County 49,210 37,850 100.00% 76.92% 11,039 137 22.43% 0.28% 129 55 0.26% 0.11%

Geneva County 23,647 20,682 100.00% 87.46% 2,824 93 11.94% 0.39% 15 33 0.06% 0.14%

Henry County 15,374 9,918 100.00% 64.51% 5,395 31 35.09% 0.20% 6 24 0.04% 0.16%

Houston County 81,331 61,513 100.00% 75.63% 18,954 287 23.30% 0.35% 470 107 0.58% 0.13%

Montgomery County CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY CENTER 7,177 6,644 100.00% 92.57% 489 13 6.81% 0.18% 25 6 0.35% 0.08%

NORMANDALE LIBRARY

Tract 0020

Block Group 3 Block 301 30 30 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Block 302 48 42 100.00% 87.50% 6 0 12.50% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Block 303 103 103 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Block 304 47 47 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Block 305 56 48 100.00% 85.71% 8 0 14.29% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: RED1STRJCT Units Assigned to a District District 2 Total Populations, All Ages • Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 7

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 306 89 88 0 100.00% 98.88% 0.00% 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% 1.12%

Block 307 40 40 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 308 96 81 13 100.00% 8438% 1334% 0 2 0 0.00% 2.08% 0.00%

Block 309 33 32 0 100.00% 96.97% 0.00% 0 1 0 0.00% 3.03% 0.00%

Block 310 46 43 3 100.00% 93.48% 6.52% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 311 281 269 3 100.00% 95.73% 1.07% 0 9 0 0.00% 330% 0.00%

Block 313 46 46 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 314 44 44 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 315 266 153 107 100.00% 57.52% 4033% 0 6 0 0.00% 2.26% 0.00%

Total Block Group 3 1325 1,066 140 100.00% 87.02% 11.43% 0 18 1 0.00% 1.47% 0.08%

Total Tract 0020 1,225 1,066 140 100.00% 87.02%- 11.43% 0 18 1 0.00% 1.47% 0.08%

Tract 0021

Block Group 1 Block 101 60 60 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 102 38 38 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 103 34 34 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 104 12 12 0 100.00% ' 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 105 42 42 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 106 40 40 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 107 21 21 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 108 37 37 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 109 23 23 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 110 19 19 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 2 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 8

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Poo. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block Ill 29 29 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 112 19 19 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 .0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 113 17 17 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 114 19 15 4 100.00% 78.95% 21.05% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 115 55 52 3 100.00% 94.55% 5.45% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 116 54 54 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 117 28 . 28 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 118 50 50 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 119 59 58 1 100.00% 98.31% 1.69% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% . 0.00%

Block 120 58 54 4 100.00% 93.10% 6.90% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group I 714 702 12 100.00% 98.32% • 1.68% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 2

Block 201 7-6 1 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 202 16 16 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 203 44 43 1 100.00% 97.73% 2.27% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 204 63 48 15 100.00% 76.19% 23.81% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 205 36 34 2 100.00% 94.44% 5.56% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 206 91 58 33 100.00% 63.74% 36.26% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 207 70 56 14 100.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 208 52 52 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 209 68 63 5 100.00% 92.65% 7.35% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 210 85 72 13 100.00% 84.71% 15.29% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 211 73 63 10 100.00% 86.30% 13.70% 0 • 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District ■ District 2 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Tune: 3:16 p.m.

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 212 52 100.00% 52 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 213 35 100.00% 33 94.29% 2 5.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 214 74 100.00% 59 79.73% 15 20.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 215 . 76 100.00% 59 77.63% 17 22.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 216 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 2 842 714 100.00% 84.80% 128 15.20% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 3

Block 301 32 100.00% 20 62.50% 12 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 .0.00%

Block 302 64 100.00% 39 60.94% 24 37.50% 0 0.00% 1 1.56% 0 0.00%

Block 303 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 308 51 100.00% 42 82.35% 8 15.69% 0 0.00% 1 1.96% 0 0.00%

Block 310 24 100.00% 22 91.67% 2 8.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 311 77 100.00% 62 80.52% 15 19.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 312 37 100.00% 29 78.38% 8 21.62% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 313 22 100.00% 19 86.36% 3 J3.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 314 . 98 100.00% 68 69.39% 26 26.53% 0 0.00% 4 4.08% 0 0.00%

Block 315 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 316 0 0 0 0

Block 317 43 100.00% 35 81.40% 8 18.60% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 318 63 100.00% 57 90.48% 6 9.52% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 319 51 100.00% 36 70.59% 15 29.41% 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 0 0.00%

Total Block Group 3 562 100.00% 429 7633% 127 22.60% 0 0.00% 6 1.07% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 2 Total Populations, AH Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m.

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block Group 4

Block 401 102 68 34 100.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 402 64 62 2 100.00% 96.88% 3.13% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block403 , 56 56 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 404 55 52 3 100.00% 94.55% 5.45% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 405 29 29 .0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 406 30 30 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 407 72 52 19 100.00% 1221% 26.39% 1 0 0 1.39% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 408 21 12 9 100.00% 57.14% 42.86% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 409 53 41 12 100.00% 7736% 22.64% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% o.oo%

Block4l0 38 38 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block411 51 38 13 100.00% 74.51% 25.49% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 412 43 36 7 100.00% 83.72% 16.28% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 413 36 15 21 100.00% 41.67% 58.33% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 414 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 415 26 17 9 100.00% 65.38% 34.62% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

BIock4l6 26 24 2 100.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block4I7 54 27 27 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 418 89 74 13 100.00% 83.15% 14.61% 0 0 2 0.00% 0.00% 2.25%

Block 419 66 62 4 100.00% 93.94% 6.06% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 420 47 47 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 421 62 51 11 100.00% 82.26% 17.74% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 422 5 5 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 423 47 30 17 100.00% 63.83% 36.17% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 424 76 43 33 100.00% 56.58% 43.42% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 2 Total Populations, All Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16p.m.

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pon. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 425 44 40 4 100.00% 90.91% 9.09%' 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 426 • 57 33 24 100.00% 57.89% 42.11% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 4 1,249 982 264 100.00% 78.62% 21.14% 1 0 2 0.08% 0.00% 0.16%

Total Tract 0021 3,367 2,827 531 100.00% 83.96% 15.77% 1 6 2 0.03% 0.18% 0.06%

Tract 0022

Block Group 1

Block 101 150 27 122 100.00% 18.00% 81.33% 1 0 0 0.67% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 102 176 62 114 100.00% 35.23% 64.77% 0 0 0 0.00%. 0.00% 0.00%

Block 103 32 24 8 100.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0 0 * 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 104 61 36 25 100.00% 59.02% 40.98% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 105 61 21 40 100.00% 34.43% 65.57% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 106 78 20 58 100.00% 25.64% 74.36% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 107 91 . 45 46 100.00% 49.45% 50.55% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 108 33 7 26 100.00% 21.21% 78.79% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 109 48 25 23 100.00% 52.08% 47.92% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 110 53 24 29 100.00% 45.28% 54.72% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 111 98 51 46 100.00% 52.04% 46.94% 1 0 0 1.02% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 1 881 342 537 100.00% 38.82% 60.95% 2 0 0 0.23% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 2

Block 201 75 36 39 100.00% 48.00% 52.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 202 40 13 27 100.00% 32.50% 67.50% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 203 56 32 24 100.00% 57.14% 42.86% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 2 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 12

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 204 474 100.00% 24 5.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Block Group 2 • 645 100.00% 105 16.28% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 3

Block 304 50 100.00% 27 54.00% 21 42.00% 0 0.00% 2 4.00% 0 0.00%

Block 305 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 11 84.62% 2 15.38% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 306 46 100.00% 9 19.57% 36 78.26% 0 0.00% 1 2.17% 0 0.00%

Block 310 59 100.00% 23 38.98% 35 59.32% 0 0.00% 1 1.69% 0 0.00%

Block312 480 100.00% 224 46.67% 255 53.13% 0 0.00% 1 0.21% 0 0.00%

Block 313 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 648 100.00% 283 43.67% 358 2 0.31% 5 0.77% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 0022 2,174 100.00% 730 33.58% 1,435 66.01% 4 0.18% 5 0.23% 0 0.00%

Total NORMANDALE LIBRARY 6,766 100.00% 4,623 68.33% 2,106 31.13% 5 0.07% 29 0.43% 3 0.04%

HIGHLAND AVE ELEMENTARY 2,399 100.00% 2,221 92.58% 160 6.67% 1 0.04% 10 0.42% 7 0.29%

VAUGHN ROAD ELEMENTARY 8,051 100.00% 7,524 93.45% 417 5.18% 22 0.27% 79 0.98% 9 0.11%

SOUTHEAST YMCA 5,843 100.00% 5,660 96.87% 151 2.58% 2 0.03% 28 0.48% 2 0.03%

ALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST 6,572 100.00% 5,733 87.23% 711 10.82% 14. 0.21% 97 1.48%' 17 0.26%

JOHN PATTERSON TRADE SCHOOL 7,780 100.00% 3,614 46.45% 4,066 52.26% 7 0.09% 81 1.04% 12 0.15%

PETERSON ELEMENTARY 4,217 100.00% 2,172 51.51% 1,888 44.77% 12 0.28% 64 1.52% 81 1.92%

CAPITOL HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER 7,012 100.00% 5,577 79.54% 1,295 18.47% 28 99 1.41% 13 0.19%

HIGHLAND GARDENS COMMUNITY CENTER 5,337 100.00% 4,945 92.66% 305 5.71% 32 0.60% 46 0.86% 9 0.17%

LIBRARY-COLISEUM BRANCH 4,424 100.00% 4,324 97.74% 58 1.31% 9 0.20% 33 0.75% 0 0.00%

LAGOON PARK FIRE STATION 7,181 100.00% 6,584 91.69% 445 6.20% 17 0.24% 107 1.49% 28 0.39%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRJCT Units Assigned to a District District 2 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 13

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total 'Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

FLOWERS ELEMENTARY 6,575 6,215 331 100.00% 94.52% 5.03% 12 13 4 0.18% 0.20% 0.06%

GOODWYN COMMUNITY CENTER 6,085 5,844 172 100.00% 96.04% 2.83% 7 51 11 0.12% 0.84% 0.18%

ALCAZAR SHRINE TEMPLE 3,262 2,535 667 100.00% 77.71% 20.45% 2 47 11 0.06% 1.44% 0.34%

WARES FERRY ROAD ELEMENTARY 3,175 2,596 502 100.00% 81.76% 15.81% 10 57 10 0.31% 1.80% 0.31%

JIM WALTERS HOMES 1,597 1,017 5S8 100.00% 63.68% 34.94% 10 2 10 0.63% 0.13% 0.63%

SETH JOHNSON ELEMENTARY 6,109 4,489 1,500 100.00% 73.48% 24.55% 13 74 33 0.21% 1.21% 0.54%

PETER CRUMP ELEMENTARY 3,899 2,125 1,712 100.00% 54.50% 43.91% 12 44 6 0.31% 1.13% 0.15%

PINEDALE COMMUNITY CENTER 8,212 4,525 3,625 100.00% 55.10% 44.14% 11 37 14 0.13% 0.45% 0.17%

AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT MONTGOMERY 6,135 5,151 793 100.00% 83.96% 12.93% 7 169 15 0.11% 2.75% 0.24%

WOODMERE INFORMATION CENTER 4,986 4,502 367 100.00% 90.29% 7.36% 21 83 13 0.42% 1.66% 0.26%

EASTDALE BAPTIST CHURCH 2,540 2,199 249 100.00% 86.57% 9.80% 8 67 17 0.31% 2.64% 0.67%

GEORG WASHINGTON JUNIOR HIGH 3,942 1,339 2,564 100.00% 33.97% 65.04% 19 18 2 0.48% 0.46% 0.05%

POCE ROAD LIBRARY 852 510 342 100.00% 59.86% 40.14% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

CHESSER COMMUNITY CENTER 1,340 946 388 100.00% 70.60% 28.96% 6 0 0 0.45% 0.00% 0.00%

ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER

Tract 0058

Block Group 2

Block 205 4 3 1 100.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 2 4 3 1 100.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 3

Block 323 9 9 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00'% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 3 9 9 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 0058 13 12 1 100.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 2 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 14

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Total ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER 13 100.00% 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

COUNTY BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 1,080 100.00% 647 59.91% 433 40.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

SIKES & KÓHN COUNTRY MALL 896 100.00% 513 5725% 377 42.08% 5 056% 1 0.11% 0 0.00%

Total Montgomery County 133,457 100.00% 104,786 78.52% 26,672 19.99% 305 0.23% 1.361 1.02% 333 0.25%

Pike County 27,595 100.00% 17,814 64.56% 9,548 34.60% 146 0.53% 68 0.25% 19 0.07%

Total District 2 100.00% 74.78% 24.13% 0.29% 0.58% 0.22%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 3 Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 15

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Poo. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Bibb County

GREENPOND 1,980 1,907 66 100.00% 96.31% 3.33% 3 0 4 0.15% 0.00% 0.20%

CEDAR GROVE 802 699 98 100.00% 87.16% 12.22% 4 1 0 0.50% 0.12% 0.00%

PONDVILLE 489 430 58 100.00% 87.93% 11.86% 1 0 0 0.20% 0.00% 0.00%

BRENT-SOUTH 3,064 1,589 1,467 100.00% 51.86% 47.88% 2 0 6 0.07% 0.00% 0.20%

CENTREVILLE 2,116 1,681 433 100.00% 79.44% 20.46% 1 1 0 0.05% 0.05% 0.00%

RANDOLPH 784 650 134 100.00% 82.91% 17.09% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

RJVERBEND 288 288 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WEST BLOCKTON-WEST

Tract 9513

Block Group 3 Block 306B 77 66 11 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 306D 93 89 3 100.00% 95.70% 3.23% 0 1 0 0.00% 1.08% 0.00%

Block 308D 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0

Block 327 33 7 26 100.00% 21.21% 78.79% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 328 9 9 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 329 1 0 1 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0,00%

Block 330 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 331 6 1 5 100.00% 16.67% 83.33% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 332 7 0 7 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 333 2 0 2 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 334B 158 153 5 100.00% 96.84% 3.16% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 337 5 5 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 338 39 39 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 3 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m.

Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 339 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 340 • 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 341 20 20 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 342 9 9 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 343 53 53 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Water block 399D 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399F 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399G 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399H 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0

Water block 399J 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 512 451 60 100.00% 88.09% 11.72% 0 1 0 0.00% 0.20% 0.00%

Block Gioup4

Block 408A 2 2 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 408B 47 47 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 409 35 35 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 410 54 54 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

B!ock411 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 412 2 2 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block413A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block413B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 414 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 423 0 0 0 ooo

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 3 Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m.

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 424 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 429 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% .0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 430 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 431 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 499B 0 0 0 0

Water block 499R 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 499T 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 499U 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 499V 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 4 151 100.00% 151 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 5

Block 520 66 100.00% 36 54.55% 30 45.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 521 46 100.00% • 40 86.96% 6 13.04% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 522A 28 100.00% 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 522B 102 100.00% 59 57.84% 43 42.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 523 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 524 0 0 0 0 0

Block 525 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 526 10 100.00% 9 90.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 527 40 100.00% 40 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 528 82 100.00% 82 100.00% 0 0.00% . 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 529 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 549 14 100.00% 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 3 Total Populations, All Age? Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 18

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 550 21 21 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 551 19 19 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 .0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Water block 599J 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water bIock'S99K 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 5 428 348 79 100.00% 81.31% 18.46% 1 0 0 0.23% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9513 1,091 950 139 100.00% 87.08% 12.74% 1 1 0 0.09% 0.09% 0.00%

Total WEST BLOCKTON-WEST 1,091 950 139 100.00% 87.08% 12.74% 1 1 0 0.09% 0.09% 0.00%

EOLINE 616 523 93 100.00% 84.90% 15.10% 0 0.0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% .

BRENT-NORTH 1,224 1,065 152 100.00% 87.01% 12.42% 0 7 0 0.00% 0.57% 0.00%

HARRISBURG 410 207 . 203 100.00% 50.49% 49.51% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

TABERNACLE 193 189 4 100.00% 97.93% 2.07% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Bibb County 13,057 10,178 2,847 100.00% 77.95% 21.80% 12 10 10 0.09% 0.08% 0.08%

Calhoun County 116,034 92,873 21,578 100.00% 80.04% 18.60% 296 869 418 0.26% 0.75% 0.36%

Chambers County 36,876 23,575 13,221 100.00% 63.93% 35.85% 41 13 26 0.11% 0.04% 0.07%

Chilton County 32,458 28,647 3,674 100.00% 88.26% 11.32% 63 38 36 0.19% 0.12% 0.11%

Clay County 13,252 11,044 2,166 100.00% 83.34% 16.34% 23 13 6 0.17% 0.10% 0.05%

Cleburne County 12,730 12,084 587 100.00% 94.93% 4.61% 20 13 26 0.16% 0.10% 0.20%

Coosa County 11,063 7,242 3,782 100.00% 65.46% 34.19% 34 4 1 0.31% 0.04% 0.01%

Lee County 87,146 64,889 20,407 100.00% 74.46% 23.42% 132 1,584 134 0.15% 1.82% 0.15%

Macon County 24,928 3,443 21,340 100.00% 13.81% 85.61% 24 99 22 0.10% 0.40% 0.09%

Randolph County 19,881 15,138 4,686 100.00% 76.14% 23.57% 29 21 7 0.15% 0.11% 0.04%

Russell County 46,860 28,473 18,088 100.00% 60.76% 38.60% 90 117 92 0.19% 0.25% 0.20%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 District 3 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 19

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

St. Clair County 50,009 100.00%. 45,138 90.26% 4,561 9.12% 136 037% 77 0.15% 97 0.19%

Talladega County 74,107 100.00% 50,970 68.78% 22,773 30.73% 174 033% 113 0.15% 77 0.10%

Tallapoosa County 38,826 100.00% 28,493 7339% • 10,212 2630% 62 0.16% 37 0.10% 22 0.06%

Total District 3 577,227 100.00% 422,187 73.14% 149,922 25.97% 1,136 0.20% 3,008 0.52% 974 0.17%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 20

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Blount County 39,248 100.00% 38,397 97.83% 521 1.33% 133 0.34% 33 0.08% 164 0.42%

Cherokee County 19,543 100.00% 18,154 92.89% 1391 6.61% 51 0.26% 24 0.12% 23 0.12%

Cullman County 67,613 100.00% 66,744 98.71% 560 0.83% 134 030% 117 0.17% 58 0.09%

DcKalb County • 54,651 100.00% 52,980 96.94% 1,028 1.88% 481 0.88% 77 0.14% 85 0.16%

Etowah County 99,840 100.00% 85,274 85.41% 13,799 13.82% 250 0.25% 419 0.42% 98 0.10%

Fayette County 17,962 100.00% 15,717 87.50% 2,190 12.19% 9 0.05% 19 0.11% 27 0.15%

Franklin County 27,814 100.00% 26,463 95.14% 1,249 4.49% 57 030% 35 0.13% 10 0.04%

Lamar County 15,715 100.00% 13,805 87.85% 1,862 11.85% 24 0.15% 10 0.06% 14 0.09%

Lawrence County

CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX 1

Tract 9791

Block Group 1 Block 109 16 100.00% 13 $1.25% 3 18.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 110A 23 100.00% 1 435% 22 95.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block HOB 62 100.00% 2 333% 58 93.55% 2 3.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 111A 79 100.00% 2 2.53% 77 97.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 11IB 0 0 0 0 0 0

o 0.00% o 0.00% 18 100.00% 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 8

o o o 0 0 o

Block 112A II 100.00% 0 11 0.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 112B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 113 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 46 92.00% 4 8.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 1I4A 107 100.00% 18 16.82% 89 83.18% 0 0.00% 0 ■ 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 114B ' 0 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 21

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 115A 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 115B 26 100.00%' 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 116 48 100.00% 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 117 / 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 118A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block USB 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 119 45 42 0 2 0 1

Block 120 100.00% 1 93.33% 1 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 2.22% 0

Block 121 100.00% 0 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 123 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 124 0 0 0 . 0 0 0

Block 125 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 132 0 . 0 0 0 0 0

Block 133 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 134 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 135 30 25 5 0 0 0

Block 136A 100.00% 47 83.33% 5 16.67% 38 0.00% 4 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Block 136B 100.00% 25 10.64% 7 80.85% 18 8.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Block 137 100.00% 0 28.00% 0 72.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Block 138 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 139 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 152 0 0 0 - 0 0 0

Block 153 13 100.00% 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 22

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Poo. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 154 22 100.00% 17 1727% 5 22.73% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 155 35 100.00% 35 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% *0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 156A 97 100.00% 6 6.19% 91 93.81% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 156B 56 100.00% 2 3.57% 54 96.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 157 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 158 12 100.00% 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 159 11 100.00% 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 160 16 100.00% 11 68.75% 1 6.25% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 161 29 100.00% 8 27.59% 21 72.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 '0.00%

Block 162 28 100.00% 9 32.14% 19 67.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 163 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 164 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 165 A 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 165B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 166 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 167 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 168 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 169 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 170 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 173 36 100.00% 25 69.44% 10 27.78% 1 2.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 174 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 175 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 176 38 100.00% 14 36.84% 20 52.63% 4 10.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 177

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: l/21/?2 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 23

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 178 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 179 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 180 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 181 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 182 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 189 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group I 1,013 100.00% 288 28.43% 703 69.40% 21 2.07% 0 0.00% 1 0.10%

Block Group 2 Block 201 18 100.00% 10 55.56% 2 6 11.11% 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 202 0 0 0 0 0 . 0

Block 203 0 0 0 0

Block 210 36 100.00% 36 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 211 32 100.00% . 29 90.63% 0 0.00% 3 9.38% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% •

Block 212 41 100.00%. 41 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 213 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 214 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 215 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 216 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 217 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 218 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 219 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 220 6 100.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 221 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRJCT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 24

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop, Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 223 53 100.00% 51 96.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 224 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 o.oa% 0 0.00%

Block 227 0 0 0 0

Block 228 ■ 0 0

Block 229 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 230 26 100.00% 0 0.00% 24 92.31% 2 7.69% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 231 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 232 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 233 29 100.00% 20 68.97% 7 24.14% 2 6.90% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 236 4 100.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 237 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 238 30 100.00% 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 239 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 240 14 100.00% 5 35.71% 9 64.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 241 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 242 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 243 0 0 0 0 0

Block 244 0 0

Block 245 63 100.00% 61 96.83% 2 3.17% 0 0.00% •0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 246 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 247 15 100.00% 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 252 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 273 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 274 0 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned lo a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 25

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 275 11 100.00% 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 276 . 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 277 0 0 0 0

Block 278 / 0 0 0

Block 279 0 0

Block 280 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 281 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 282 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 283 12 100.00% 1 8.33% 11 91.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 284 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Water block 299A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299B 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299C 0 0 0

Water block 299D 0 0 0

Water block 299E 0 0 0

Water block 299F 0 0 0

Total Block Group 2 469 100.00% 254 54.16% 202 43.07% 13 2.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 9791 1,482 100.00% 542 36.57% 905 61.07% 34 2.29% 0 0.00% 1 0.07%

Total CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX 1 1,482 100.00% 542 36.57% 905 61.07% 34 2.29% 0 0.00% 1 0.07%

FISH POND CHURCH PCT 1 BX 2 426 100.00% 214 50.23% 186 43.66% 26 6.10% 0 0.00% 0 o'.oo%

MASONIC HALL PCT 6 BX 1 978 100.00% 730 74.64% 208 21.27% ' 39 3.99% 1 0.10% 0 0.00%

DONALD CHURCH PCT 7 BX 1 797 100.00% 665 83.44% 79 9.91% 52 6.52% 0 0.00% 1 0.13%

FLAT ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER PCT 8 B 285 100.00% 258 90.53% 0 0.00% 27 9.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned lo a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 26

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind, Total Asian/PI Total Other

MASONIC HALL PCT 8 BX 3 352 100.00% 305 86.65% • 0 0.00% 47 1335% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

MT HOPE HIGH SCHOOL PCT 9 BX 1 . 1,033 100.00% 940 91.00% 46 4.45% 47 4.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

TERRYS TIRE COMPANY PCT 9 BX 2 732 100.00% 628 85.79% 56 7.65% 47 6.42% 1 0.14% 0 0.00%

FIRE STATION PCT 10 BX 1 2,019 100.00% 1,862 9222% 7 0.35% 148 7.33% 1 0.05% 1 0.05%

MORRIS CHAPEL CHURCH PCT 11 BX 1 2212 100.00% 2,026 91.59% 4 0.18% 180 8.14% 1 0.05% 1 0.05%

LANIER STORE PCT 11 BX 2 783 100.00% 697 89.02% 3 0.38% 83 10.60% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

MASONIC HALL PCT 12 BX 1 1255 100.00% 1,166 92.91% 0 0.00% 88 7.01% 1 0.08% 0 0.00%

FERE STATION PCT 13 BX 1 1,490 100.00% 1,321 88.66% 0 0.00% 169 11.34% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

OLD MIDWAY STORE PCT 14 BX 1 630 100.00% 588 93.33% 0 0.00% 42 6.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

HOOPER BUILDING PCT 14 BX 2 404 100.00% 355 87.87% 27 22 5.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

FELLOWSHIP HALL PCT 15 BX 1 1,035 100.00% 972 93.91% 7 0.68% 55 5.31% 1 0.10% 0 0.00%

AYCOCK BUILDING PCT 16 BX 1 1,123 100.00% 1,051 93.59% 1 0.09% 69 6.14% 2 0.18% 0

OLD LIBERTY CHURCH PCT 17 BX 1 367 100.00% 355 96.73% 0 0.00% 12 3.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

FIRE STATION PCT 18 BX 1 836 100.00% 731 87.44% 12 1.44% 93 11.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

ARMORY PCT 19 BX 1 1,727 100.00% 1,553 89.92% 113 6.54% 61 3.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

FAIRFIELD CHURCH PCT 19 BX 2 152 100.00% 128 84.21% 0 0.00% 21 13.82% 3 1.97% 0 0.00%

PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH PCT 20 BX 1 246 100.00% 229 93.09% fl 4.47% 6 2.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

TAB SCOTT BUILDING PCT 21 BX I 863 100.00% 578 66.98% 209 2422% 76 8.81% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

HIGH SCHOOL PCT 21 BX 2 795 100.00% 638 80.25% 9 1.13% 147 18.49% 1 0.13% 0 0.00%

LINDSEY HALL CHURCH PCT 22 BX 1 94 100.00% 91 96.81% 0 0.00% 3 3.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

PINEY GROVE CHURCH PCT 22 BX 2 169 100.00% 154 91.12% 0 0.00% 15 8.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

GILLESPIE STORE PCT 23 BX 1 280 100.00% 266 95.00% 0 0.00% 14 5.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

PINHOOK COMMUNITY CENTER PCT 23 BX 252 100.00% 200 79.37% 11 4.37% 41 16.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

CITY HALL PCT 24 BX 1 515 100.00% 460 89.32% 0 0.00% 54 10.49% 1 0.19% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 27

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Otlter

MT MORIAH CHURCH PCT 24 BX 2 330 100.00% 290 87.88% 12 3.64% 28 8.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

BOARD OF EDUCATION PCT 25 BX 1 •2,409 100.00% 1,996 82.86% 218 9.05% 193 8.01% 0 0.00% 2 0.08%

RUTHERFORD STORE PCT 25 BX 2 118 100.00% 94 79.66% 0 0.00% 24 20.34% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

FREEMAN TABERNACLE CHURCH PCT 25 B 310 100.00% 24 7.74% 284 91.61% 2 0.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Lawrence County 26,499 100.00% 22,107 83.43% 2,408 9.09% 1,965 7.42% 13 0.05% 6 0.02%

Marion County 29,830 100.00% 28,759 96.41% 967 324% 57 0.19% 35 0.12% 12 0.04%

Marshall County 70,832 100.00% 69,361 97.92% 1,087 1.53% 231 0.33% 111 0.16% 42 0.06%

Pickens County LIBERTY 483 100.00% 281 58.18% 202 41.82% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

REFORM 2229 100.00% 1,423 63.84% 805 36.11% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

ETHELSVILLE 742 100.00% 612 82.48% 130 17.52% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

MCSHAN 274 100.00% 196 71.53% 74 27.01% 2 0.73% 2 0.73% 0 0.00%

PINE GROVE 91 100.00% . 84 92.31% 7 7.69% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

CARROLLTON 116 100.00% 104 89.66% 12 10.34% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

ALICEV1LLE 3,633 100.00% 981 27.00% 2,646 72.83% 1 0.03% 5 0.14% 0 0.00%

PALMETTA 502 100.00% 431 85.86% 67 13.35% 4 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

FAIRVIEW 1215 100.00% 1,191 98.02% 23 I.89% 1 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

REFORM 1,564 100.00% 1,182 75.58% 369 23.59% 10 0.64% 2 0.13% 1 0.06%

HOLLY SPRINGS 94 100.00% 83 88.30% 11 II.70% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

GORDO 785 100.00% 727 92.61% 55 7.01% 2 0.25% 1 0.13% 0 0.00%

CARROLLTON

Tract 9879

Block Group 1

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 28

Plan m>e: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Total Total Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Total Other

Block 108A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 113 59 100.00% 59 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 114 9 100.00% 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 115 ■ 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 116 0 0 0 0

Block 117 18 100.00% 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 118 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 119 17 100.00% 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 120 A 43 100.00% 43 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 120B 44 100.00% 44 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 121A 14 100.00% 9 64.29% 5 35.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 121B 37 100.00% 22 59.46% 15 40.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 123 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 124A 156 100.00% 115 73.72% 40 25.64% 1 0.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 127 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 128A 47 100.00% 47 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 129 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 130 25 100.00% 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% '0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 131 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 132 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 133 12 100.00% 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 134 17 100.00% 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 135 . 10 100.00% 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations. All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 29

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 136 2 100.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 137 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 138 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 139 • 4 100.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 140 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 141 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 142 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 143 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 144A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 145A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 145B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 147 4 100.00% 4 100.00% 0' 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 148 79 100.00% 20 25.32% 59 74.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 149 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 150 0 0 0 •o 0 0

Water block 199B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199D 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199F 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199G 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 1 617 100.00% 496 80.39% 120 19.45% 1 0.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 2

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m.

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Total Asian/PI Other

Block 205A 0 0 0

0 0.00% Block 206A 60 1 59 0 100.00% 1.67% 98.33% 0.00% <=>.£ §

0 Block 207 0 0 0 0 o

Block 208/ 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 209 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 210 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 211 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 212 0 0 0

Block 213 0

Block 214 0 0 0

Block 215 31 100.00% 4 12.90% 27 87.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 216 55 100.00% 27 49.09% 27 49.09% 1 1.82% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 217 4 100.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 218 10 100.00% . 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 219 6 100.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 220 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 221 20 100.00% 11 55.00% 9 45.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 222 16 100.00% 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 223 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 224 58 100.00% 53 91.38% 5 8.62% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 225A 38 100.00% 19 50.00% 19 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 226 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 227A 100.00% 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Block 228 6 100.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m.

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Pop, White Total Total Total Black ‘ Am. Ind. Asian/PI Total Other

Block 229A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 229B 0 0 p 0

Block 230 38 100.00% 30 78.95% 8 21.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 231 ■ 13 100.00% 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 232 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 233A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 233B 14 14 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 234A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 234B 7 7 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 235 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 236 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 237 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 238 21 100.00% 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 239 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 243 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 244 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 245 25 25 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 246 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 247 0 0 0 0

Block 248A 68 100.00% 63 92.65% 5 735% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% . 0 0.00%

Block 248B 106 100.00% 40 37.74% 66 6236% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 249 9 100.00% 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 250 7 100.00% 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 251 0 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 32

Plan tvoe: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 252 0 0 0 0 0

Block 253 20 100.00% 13 65.00% 7 35.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 254 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 255 • 0 0 0

Block 256 100.00% 100.00% - 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 257 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299D 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299F 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 2 662 100.00% 410 61.93% 251 37.92% 1 0.15% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group?

Block 301A 64 100.00% • 7 10.94% 57 89.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 301B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 302A 0 0 0 0 0

Block 302B 0 0 0 0 0

Block 303 0 0 0 0 0

Block 304 0 0 0 0 0

Block 305 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 306A 45 100.00% 45 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 307 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 308 97 100.00% 3 3.09% 94 96.91% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 309 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 33

Plan type; CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unit Total Pop. Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 310 24 100.00% 2 22 8.33% 91.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 315 22 100.00% 3 19 13.64% 86.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block_316 17 100.00% 0 17 0.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 317 ' 11 100.00% 2 9 18.18% 81.82% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 318 7 100.00% 0 7 0.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 319 1 100.00% 0 1 0.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 32SA 201 100.00% 40 158 19.90% 78.61% 0 0.00% 3 1.49% 0 0.00%

Block 328B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 329 71 100.00% 0 71 0.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399B 0 0 0 • 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 579 100.00% 102 17.62% 474 81.87% 0 0.00% 3 0.52% 0 0.00%

Block Group 4

Block 401 16 100.00% 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 402 45 100.00% 43 95.56% 2 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 403 8 100.00% 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 404 15 100.00% 6 40.00% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 436 176 100.00% 21 11.93% 155 88.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 437 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 438 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 441 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 100.00% 1 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 471 5 100.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 472 0 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 34

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Water block 499B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 4 273 • 96 177 100.00% 35.16% 64.84% 0 .0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9&79 2,131 1,104 1,022 100.00% 51.81% 47.96% 2 3 0 0.09% 0.14% 0.00%

Total CARROLLTON ' "‘¡Ü31 1,104 1,022 100.00% 51.81% 47.96% 2 3 0 0.09% 0.14% 0.00%

SAPPS

Tract 9879

Block Group 3 Block 326A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 326B 57 4 53 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 327 0 0 • 0 0 0 0

Water block 399L 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 57 4 53 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9879 57 4 53 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Tract 9881

Block Group 1 Block 109 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Tract 9881 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total SAPPS 57 4 53 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

HOLLY SPRINGS 67 67 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 4 Total Populations, All Ages* Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 35

Plan tvue: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other .

GORDO/KIRK 0540 2,500 100.00% 1,682 67.28% 814 32.56% 0 0.00% 4 0.16% 0 0.00%

SPEEDS MILL 193 100.00% 192 99.48% 0.52% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

BENEVOLA/ALICEVILLE 0560 (PART) 128 100.00% 66 51.56% 62 48.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

ALICEVILLE 1,153 100.00% 900 78.06% 243 21.08% 0 0.00% 10 0.87% 0 0.00%

Total Pickens County 17,957 100.00% 11,310 62.98% 6,596 36.73% 23 0.13% 27 0.15% 1 0.01%

Walker County 67,670 100.00% 63,042 93.16% 4,405 6.51% 84 0.12% 107 0.16% 32 0.05%

Winston County 22,053 100.00% 21,925 99.42% 57 0.26% 42 0.19% 26 0.12% 3 0.01%

Total District 4 577,227 100.00% 534,038 92.52% 38,020 6.59% 3,541 0.61% 1,053 0.18% 575 0.10%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 5 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 36

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI

Colbert County 51,666 100.00% 42,820 82.88% 8,568 16.58% 137 0.27% 93 0.18% 48 0.09%

Jackson County 47,796 100.00% 44,696 93.51% 1,968 4.12% 1,020 2.13% 90 0.19% 22 0.05%

Lauderdale County 79,661 100.00% 71,560 89.83% 7,695 9.66% 165 0.21% 196 0.25% 45 0.06%

Lawrence County

CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX I

Tract 9791

Block Group 2

Block 204 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 205 0 0 0 0 0 . 0

Block 206 5 5 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Block 207 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 208 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 209 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 222 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 225 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 226 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 2 5 5 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9791 5 5 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Total CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX 1 5 5 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

SENIOR CITIZENS PCT 2 BX I 1,462 231 100.00% 15.80% 1,221 10 83.52% 0.68% 0 o 0.00% 0.00%

FIRE STATION PCT 3 BX 1 784 211 100.00% 26.91% 570 1 72.70% 0.13% 0 2 0.00% 0.26%

WHEELER GROVE CHURCH PCT 4 BX 1 ,229 143 100.00% 62.45% 86 0 37.55% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 5 Total Populations, All AgeS Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 37

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

DEPOT PCT 5 BX1 1,609 100.00% 1,047 65.07% 513 31.88% 42 2.61% 6 0.37% 1 0.06%

WOLF SPRINGS CHURCH PCT 8 BX 1 925 100.00% 819 88.54% 0 0.00% 106 11.46% X) 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Lawrence County 5,014 100.00% 2,456 48.98% 2,390 47.67% 159 3.17% 6 0.12% 3 0.06%

Limestone County 54,135 100.00% 46,658 86.19% 7,127 13.17% 148 027% 158 029% 44 0.08%

Madison County 238,912 100.00% 184,197 77.10% 48,116 20.14% 1,601 0.67% 4,232 1.77% 766 0.32%

Morgan County 100,043 100.00% 89,122 89.08% 10,081 10.08% 310 031% 370 0.37% 160 0.16%

Total District 5 577,227 100.00% 481,509 83.42% 85,945 14.89% 3,540 0.61% 5,145 0.89% 1,088 0.19%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 6 Total Populations, AH Ages Date: 1/21/92 Tune: 3:16 p.m. Page: 38

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other

Bibb County SIX MILE ‘ 578 572 5 100.00% 98.96% 0.87% 0 .1 0 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%

BRIERFEELD 848 537 311 100.00% 6333% 36.67% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WEST BLOCKTON-EAST 1,489 1,177 307 100.00% 79.05% 20.62% 5 0 0 0.34% 0.00% 0.00%

WEST BLOCKTON-WEST

Tract 9513

Block Group 3 Block 384 8 8 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 385 22 22 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 3 30 30 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 4 Block 407 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 4 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9513 34 34 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total WEST BLOCKTON-WEST 34 34 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

MARVEL 180 172 8 100.00% 95.56% 4.44% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

GREY HILL 390 382 0 100.00% 97.95% 0.00% 8 0 0 2.05% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Bibb County 3,519 2,874 631 100.00% 81.67% 17.93% 13 1 0 0.37% 0.03% 0.00%

Icffcrson County BURKETT CENTER FOR MULTI-HN 4,261 3,880 374 100.00% 91.06% 8.78% 2 3 2 0.05% 0.07% 0.05%

FULTONDALE COMMUNITY CENTER 7,059 6,793 232 100.00% 96.23% 3.29% 16 17 1 0.23% 0.24% 0.01%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 6 Total Populations, AH Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 39

Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

GARDENDALE CIVIC CTR/4306 MORRIS M 13,034 100.00% 12,820 98.36% 170 1.30% 28 021% 10-0.08% 6 0.05%

NEW CASTLE UNITED METHODIST ‘ 1,316 100.00% 1,273 96.73% 35 2.66% 5 0.38% 2 0.15% 1 0.08%

KIMBERLY CITY HALL 1,668 100.00% 1,603 96.10% 63 3.78% 2 0.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

TRAFFORD CITY HALL 895 100.00% 843 94.19% 49 5.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 0.34%

KERMIT JOHNSON ELEM/PALMERDALE FIR 7,966 100.00% 7358 92.37% 587 7.37% 16 020% 3 0.04% 2 0.03%

CLAY COMMUNITY CTR/4313 GRAYSON VA 8.532 100.00% 8,353 97.90% 141 1.65% 18 021% 17 0.20% 3 0.04%

PINSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH/431 4.532 100.00% 4,435 97.86% 69 1.52% 11 024% 16 0.35% 1 0.02%

CENTER POINT ELEMENTARY 8,469 100.00% 7,611 89.87% 796 9 0.11% 37 0.44% 16 0.19%

CENTER POINT COURTHOUSE 6,077 100.00% 5,752 94.65% 290 4.77% 7 0.12% 25 0.41% 3 0.05%

CHALKVILLE CIVIC CENTER 6,627 100.00% 6.369 96.11% 237 3.58% 7 0.11% 11 0.17% 3 0.05%

GRAYSON VALLEY SOUTHERN 6,779 100.00% 6,583 97.11% 152 2.24% 21 0.31% 21 0.31% 2 0.03%

TRUSSVEJLE CITY HALL 9,771 100.00% 9,474 96.96% 264 2.70% 8 0.08% 20 0.20% 5 0.05%

ROBINSON SCHOOL 8,547 100.00% 6,313 73.86% 2,169 25.38% 15 0.18% 40 0.47% 10 0.12%

DON HAWKINS COMM CTR 3,237 100.00% 3,052 9428% 166 5.13% 5 0.15% 14 0.43% 0 0.00%

HUFFMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5332 100.00% 5.369 97.05% 102 1.84% 7 0.13% 47 0.85% 7 0.13%

NORTH ROEBUCK SCHOOL 4,102 100.00% 3,878 94.54% 171 4.17% 20 0.49% 26 0.63% 7 0.17%

ANDREW GAVIN FAMILY LIFE 6,398 100.00% 5,874 91.81% 471 736% 14 0.22% 29 0.45% 10 0.16%

LM SMITH SCHOOL 6,405 100.00% 5,690 88.84% 690 10.77% • 6 0.09% 16 0.25% 3 0.05%

FIRE STATION #28 8,207 100.00% 7,195 87.67% 951 11.59% 8 0.10% 42 0.51% 11 0.13%

MOUNTAIN CHAPEL METHODIST 5,917 100.00% 5,864 99.10% 8 0.14% 2 0.03% 39 0.66% 4 0.07%

VESTAVIA CITY HALL 3,599 100.00% 3,544 98.47% 19 0.53% 0 0.00% 35 0.97% 1 0.03%

MOUNTAIN BROOK GRAMMAR SCHOOL 1,945 100.00% 1,933 99.38% 3 0.15% 3 0.15% 6 0.31% 0 0.00%

LOCKSLEY FIRE STATION 4,558 100.00% 4,521 99.19% 6 0.13% 4 0.09% 27 0.59% 0 0.00%

OVERTON ROAD METHODIST/4608 LEEDS 7,713 100.00% 7,101 92.07% 546 7.08% 17 022% 42 0.54% 7 0.09%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 6 Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: "40

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH 4,743 4,679 9. 100.00% 98.65% 0.19% 2 43 10 0.04% 0.91% 0.21%

CAHABA HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4,822 4,733 45 100.00% 98.15% 0.93% 9 32. 3 0.19% 0.66% 0.06%

BROOKWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH 4,837 4,747 28 100.00% 98.14% 0.58% 2 58 2 0.04% 130% 0.04%

HIGHLAND RACQUET CLUB 1,398 1,289 90 100.00% 92.20% 6.44% 4 13 2 039% 0.93% 0.14%

AVONDALESCHOOL 2,320 2383 28 100.00% 98.41% T.21% 3 4 2 0.13% 0.17% 0.09%

DONALD COMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,365 2,885 446 100.00% 85.74% 13.25% 5 26 3 0.15% 0.77% 0.09%

WOODLAWN FIRE STATION 3,565 2,215 1,323 100.00% 62.13% 37.11% 2 15 10 0.06% 0.42% 038%

MOUNTAIN BROOK CITY HALL 3,669 3,657 5 100.00% 99.67% 0.14% 1 6 0 0.03% 0.16% 0.00%

MCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCH 5,858 5,445 332 100.00% 92.95% 5.67% 7 72 2 0.12% 133% 0.03%

IRONDALE CITY HALL 8,945 7,177 1,632 100.00% 80.23% 18.24% 23 98 ' 15 036% 1.10% 0.17%

EAST JEFFERSON COUNTY FERE STATION 1,877 1,523 345 100.00% 81.14% • 18.38% 6 2 1 0.32% 0.11% 0.05%

LEEDS ARMORY 4,553 3,385 1,145 100.00% 74.35% 25.15% 8 1 14 • 0.18% 0.02% 0.31%

KNESSETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE 1,706 1,696 6 100.00% 99.41% 035% 1 3 0 0.06% 0.18% 0.00%

48014802 4803 4807 4808 PCTS COMB 26,396 24,878 1,036 100.00% 94.25% 3.92% 41 385 56 0.16% 1.46% 031%

ST MARKS UNITED METHODIST 6,697 6,448 105 100.00% 96.28% 1.57% 11 115 18 0.16% 1.72% 037%

VESTAVIA PLAZA MALL-SEARS 1,195 1,172 8 100.00% 98.08% 0.67% 1 14 0 0.08% 1.17% 0.00%

VESTAVIA HIGH SCHOOL 6,317 5,997 191 100.00% 94.93% 3.02% 3 107 19 0.05% 1.69% 0.30%

PLEASANT GROVE COMMUNITY 8,579 8,377 177 100.00% 97.65% 2.06% 15 6 4 0.17% 0.07% 0.05%

HUEYTOWN ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 6,746 4,299 2,423 100.00% 63.73% 35.92% 8 16 0 0.12% 034% 0.00%

SYLVAN SPRINGS COMMUNITY 1,695 1,682 7 100.00% 9933% 0.41% 5 0 1 0.29% 0.00% 0.06%

MAYTOWN CITY HALL 504 436 65 100.00% 86.51% 12.90% 3 0 0 0.60% . 0.00% 0.00%

BOOKER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY 197 12 185 100.00% 6.09% 93.91% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY

Tract 0142.03

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 District 6 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages page: 41

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Total Total Total Pop. White Black Am. Ind. AsianjPI Other

Block Group 1

Block 124 • 107 107 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 125 18 18 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 128 51 50 0 100.00% 98.04% 0.00% 0 1 0 0.00% 1.96% 0.00%

Block 131 38 38 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 148 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 1 214 213 0 100.00% 99.53% 0.00% 0 1 0 0.00% 0.47% 0.00%

Block Group 2 Block 215 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 216 31 31 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 217 98 94 • 0 100.00% 95.92% 0.00% 1 1 2 1.02% 1.02% 2.04%

Block 219 12 12 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%' 0.00%

Block 220 82 82 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 221 21 21 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 2 244 240 0 100.00% 98.36% 0.00% 1 1 2 0.41% 0.41% 0.82%

Block Group 3 Block 304 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Tract 0142,03 458 453 0 100.00% 98.91% 0.00% 1 ■ -2 2 0.22% 0.44% 0.44%

Total EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY 458 453 0 100.00% 98.91% 0.00% 1 2 2 0:22% 0.44% 0.44%

WA BELL HIGH SCHOOL 1,142 873 266 100.00% 76.44% 23.29% 3 0 0 0.26% 0.00% 0.00%

Plan tvoe: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 6 Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 42

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Other

100.00% 98.20% 138% 0.04% 0.14% 0.03%

VIRGINIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2329 100.00% 2,154 92.49% 171 7.34% 1 0.04% 3 0.13% 0.00%

JOHNS CITY HALL 100.00% 7838% 20.56% 0.75% 0.00% 0.31%

OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL 1,921 100.00% 1,917 99.79% 0 0.00% 2 0.10% 0.10% 0.00%

CONCORD FIRE DEPARTMENT 4,680 100.00% 4,640 99.15% 17 0.36% 11 0.24% 9 0.19% 0.06%

ALLIANCE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,710 100.00% 74.91% 24.74% 0.19% 0.03% 0.13%

MASONIC LODGE WEST JEFFERSON 1.389 100.00% 1,368 98.49% 19 1.37% 0.07% 0.00% 0.07%

ADAMSVILLE ELEMENTARY 4,474 100.00% 87.06% 12.67% 0.20% 0.02% 0.04%

MULGA CITY HALL 1,692 100.00% 1,276 75.41% 415 24.53% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 0 D.00%

MINOR FIRE STATION 3,395 100.00% 2,308 67.98% 31.69% 034% 0.09% 0.00% 0

SANDUSKY FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 1,873 100.00% 92.37% • 7.47% 0.05% 0.11% 0.00% 5

100.00% 9133% 8.27% 0.15% 0.24% 0.11%

ADAMSVILLE CITY HALL 100.00% 80.92% 18.65% 0.38% 0.06% 0.00%

MAURICE WEST 100.00% 77.96% 21.79% 0.06% 0.16% 0.03%

BROOKSIDE CITY HALL 2,963 100.00% 2,790 94.16% 169 5.70% 3 0.10% 1 0.03% 0 0.00%

MT OLIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3376 100.00% 3362 99.57% 0.09% 0.24% 0.06% 0.03%

WARRIOR CITY HALL 3,312 100.00% 2,708 81.76% 18.00% 0.09% 0.12% 0.03%

CORNERSCHOOL 2,803 100.00% 2,790 99.54% 1 0.04% 0.11% 0.11% 0.21%

BAGLEY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4,191 100.00% 99.71% 0.02% 0.24% 0.00% 0.02%

NORTHWESTERN 852 842 9 0 1 0.12% 0 0.00%

RAMSAY HIGH SCHOOL 3,844 100.00% 2,194 57.08% 1,168 30.39% 12 0.31% 455 11.84% 15 0.39%

GLEN IRIS SCHOOL 7,412 ’ 5,479 1,599 21.57% 12 0.16% 297 4.01% 25 0.34%

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE 3,537 100.00% 2,803 79.25% 655 18.52% 12 0.34% 57 1.61% 10 0.28%

HIGHLAND MANOR APARTMENTS 158 100.00% 153 96.84% 5 3.16% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 6 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 ■ Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 43

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pod. Total White

FIRE STATION 22 4,852 100.00% 4,201 86.58%

PARKE MEMORIAL LIBRARY • 758 100.00% 679 89.58%

5506 5507 5508 PCTS COMBINED 10,443 100.00% 9,856 94.38%

HOMEWOOD RECREATION CENTER 4,700 100.00% 3,615 76.91%

CARR AVENUE FIRE STATION 4,898 100.00% 4,278 87.34%

EDGEWOOD SCHOOL 5,256 100.00% 4,613 87.77%

HOMEWOOD LIBRARY 5,536 100.00% 5363 96.88%

SHADES CAHABA SCHOOL-3,446 100.00% 3,370 97.79%

MORGAN ROAD FIRE STATION 3,557 100.00% 3,511 98.71%

HIGHLAND AVENUE FIRE STATION 1346 100.00% 1384 95.39%

fflLLVEEW COMMUNITY CENTER 2,553 100.00% 2,258 88.44%

HELL VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,265 100.00% 1,950 59.72% 0 0.00%

Total Jefferson County 393,010 100.00% 355,687 90.50% 424 0.11%

Shelby County 99358 100.00% 90,715 91.30% 7,718 7.77% 264 • 0.27% 575 86 0.58% 0.09%

Tuscaloosa County

REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER

Tract 0104.04

Block Group 1 Block 101 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 1 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 0104.04 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 6 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Pages 44-45

Plan tvnc: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI

COUNTY COURTHOUSE 5,569 100.00% 4,630 83.14%. 594 10.67% 10 0.18% 315 5.66%

CLARA VERNA-TOWERS 6/211 100.00% 4,678 7532% 1,360 21.90% 11 0.18% 141 237%

COLISEUM 4,262 100.00% 3,402 79.82% 722 16.94% 6 0.14% 123 2.89%

FOREST LAKE METHODIST CHURCH 3,109 100.00% 2,756 88.65% 312 10.04% 6 0.19% 34 1.09%

TUSCALOOSA ACADEMY/WOOD VILLAGE CO 7,720 100.00% 6,915 89.57% 686 8.89% 1 0.01% 110-1.42%

JAYCEE PARK 6,337 100.00% 4,475 70.62% 1,789 28/23% 11 0.17% 36 0.57%

HOLT ARMORY 4,878 100.00% 3,045 62.42% 1,818 37/27% 6 0.12% 5 0.10%

#6 FIRE STATION 4,879. 100.00% 4,371 89.59% 474 9.72% 5 0.10% 21 0.43% 0.16%

PETERSON CHURCH/BROOKWOOD CITY HAL 3,691 100.00% 3,648 98.84% 40 1.08% 2 0.05% 0 0.00% 1 0.03%

WESTWOOD SCHOOL BUHL SCHOOL MASONI 3,266 100.00% 2,887 88.40% 337 10.32% 7 0.21% 0 ‘0.00% ' 35 1.07%

MYRTLEWOOD SCHOOL COMMUNITY CENTER 1,818 100.00% 1,194 65.68% 611 33.61% 9 0.50% 0 0.00% 4 0.22%

BROWNVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER/MCCONN 590 100.00% 586 99.32% 4 0.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

OLD SAMANTHA SCHOOL SWINDLE 772 100.00% 653 84.59% 117 15.16% 2 036% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

MACEDONIA METHODIST CHURCH 3,825 100.00% . 3,650 95.42% 157 4.10% 7 0.18% 9 0.24% 2 0.05%

VOTING BUILDING/OLD HOPE SCHOOL SI 1,444 100.00% 1,424 98.61% 11 0.76% 0 0.00% 8 0.55% 1 0.07%

GORGAS-SAMANTHA COMM CENTER/VOTING 1,521 100.00% 1,454 95.60% 50 339% 17 1.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

FRANK FIELDS STORE/DAN TIERCE/FILE 1,511 100.00% 1,485 98 38% 20 I.32% 4 036% 0 0.00% 2 0.13%

ECHOLA/ELROD/BAMA JONES STORE 1,032 100.00% 990 95.93% 39 3.78% 1 0.10% 2 0.19% 0 0.00%

MT OLIVE FIRE STATION 2,314 100.00% 2,294 99.14% 0 0.00% 13 0.56% 6 036% 1 0.04%

CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH ■ 1,973 100.00% 1,874 94.98% 93 4.71% 3 0.15% 2 0.10% • 1 0.05%

NORTHPORT COMMUNITY CENTER 4,949 100.00% 3,813 77.05% 1,119 22.61% 2 0.04% 6 a.12% 9 0.18%

NORTHPORT ARMORY/CITY HALL 9,664 100.00% 8/273 85.61% 1,221 12.63% 17 0.18% 138 1.43% .15 0.16%

Total Tuscaloosa County 81,339 100.00% 68,501 84.22% II,574 14.23% 140 0.17% 956 1.18% 168 0.21%

Total District 6 577,226 100.00% 517,777 89.70% 53,309 9.24% 1,054 0.18% 4,408 0.76% 678 0.12%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District? Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 46

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unii Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Choctaw County 16,018 8,913 7,077 100.00% 55.64% 44.18% 10 12 6 0.06% 0.07% 0.04%

Clarke County GOSPORT' 359 45 312 100.00% 12.53% 86.91% 0 2 0 0.00% 0.56% 0.00%

SALITPA

Tract 9579

Block Group 1

Block 120 10 10 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 1 10 10 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9579 10 10 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total SALITP[ A XX XX X XXX ].00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

WINN/ZIMCO

Tract 9579

Block Group 1 Block 129 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 1 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 9579 .4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total WINN/ZIMCO 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

ANDERSONS 600 224 375 100.00% 37.33% 62.50% 0 1 o 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%

SCYRENE 1,421 888 531 100.00% ’ 62.49% 37.37% 1 1 o 0.07% 0.07% 0.00%

CHANCE 213 36 177 100.00% 16.90% 83.10% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 District 7 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 47

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Total Black Am. Ind. Total Total Asian/PI Other

MORVIN/CAMPBELL 510 175 100.00% 34.31% 335 0 65.69% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Total Clarke County 3,117 1,382 100.00% 44.34% 1,730 1 55.50% 0.03% 4 0 0.13% 0.00%

Dallas County 48,130 20,121 100.00% 41.81% 27,825 41 57.81% 0.09% 129 14 0.27% 0.03%

Greene County 10,153 1,966 100.00% 19.36% 8,181 3 80.58% ' (5.(53% 0 3 0.0Q% 0.03%

Hale County 15,498 6,255 100.00% 40.36% 9,214 20 59.45% 0.13% 9 0 0.06% 0.00%

Jefferson County BARRETT SCHOOL 3,780 1,461 100.00% 38.65% 2,290 5 60.58% 0.13% 21 3 0.56% 0.08%

CHARLES BROWN SCHOOL 4,836 1,824 100.00% 37.72% 2,996 7 61.95% 0.14% 2 7 0.04% .0.14%

ENSLEY COMMUNITY HOUSE 4,807 1,322 100.00% 27.50% 3,470 6 72.19% 0.12% 1 8 0.02% 0.17%

WYLAM FIRE STATION 3,211 1,658 100.00% 51.64% 1,552 0 48.33% 0.00% 1 0 0.03% 0.00%

FAIRFIELD HIGH CIVIC CLUB 2,828 2,422 100.00% 85.64% 385 5 13.61% 0.18% 16 0 0.57% 0.00%

GLEN OAKS SCHOOL 5,129 1,803 100.00% 35.15% 3,312 2 64.57% 0.04% 7 5 0.14% 0.10%

BESSEMER STATE TECHNICAL 3,053 '2,518 100.00% 82.48% 526 0 17.23% 0.00% 8 1 0.26% 0.03%

EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY

Tract 0141.04

Block Group 1 Block 128 2 2 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Block 129 4 4 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 1 6 6 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 0141.04 6 6 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 o 0.00% 0.00%

Tract0141.05

Block Group 2

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 48

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Total Asian/PI Other

Block 204B 43 100.00% 0 0.00%

Block 204E 0 0

Block 213A 15 100.00%

Block 213B 17 100.00%

Block 213C 0

Block 213D 0

Block 2I3E 0

Total Block Group 2 75 100.00% 75 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 9 Block 901A 0 0 0 0

Block 901B 53 100.00% 50 94.34% 3 5.66% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 902A 14 100.00% 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 902B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 902C 67 100.00% 67 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 903A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 903B 62 100.00% 61 98.39% 1 1.61% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 903C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 9Ó3D 24 100.00% 24 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 903E 11 100.00% 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 904 13 13 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 905 3 3 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 906 16 100.00% 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 907A . 20 100.00% 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 49

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 907B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 907C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 908 12 12 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 9 295 290 5 100.00% 98.31% 1.69% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 0141.05 370 365 . 5 100.00% 98.65% 1.35% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Tract 0142.03

Block Group 1

Block 101 0 0 0 ooo

Block 102 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0

Block 103 37 37 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 104 33 33 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 . 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 105 7 7 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% ' 0.00%

Block 106 16 16 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 107 O. 0*0 ooo

Block 108 16 16 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 109 42 42 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 110 44 43 0 100.00% 97.73% 0.00% 1 0 0 221% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 111 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 112 25 24 0 100.00% 96.00% 0.00% 0 1 o 0.00% 4.00% 0.00%

Block 113 20 20 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 114 80 80 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 115 15 15 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% '0 0 o 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 116 15 15 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages* Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 50

Census Unit Total Total Pop, White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 117 44 44 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 118 21 21 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 119 24 24 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 120 ' 59 59 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 121 37 37 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 122 13 12 100.00% 9231% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 7.69%

Block 123 54 47 100.00% 87.04% 6 11.11% 1 1.85% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 126 7 7 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%

Block 127 85 10 100.00% 11.76% 75 8834% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 129 84 84 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 130 82 25 100.00% 30.49% 57 1 69.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 132 25 25 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 133 3 3 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 134 11 11 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 135 550 529 100.00% 96.18% 20 3.64% 0 0.00% 1 0.18% 0 0.00%

Block 136 36 35 100.00% 9122% 0 0.00% 0 1 2.78% 0 0.00%

Block 137 127 125 100.00% 98.43% 2 1.57% 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%

Block 138A 12 12 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 138B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block I38C 13 13 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 138D 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 139A 0 0

Block 139B 0 0

Block 140 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 51

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 141 20 20 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 142 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 143 69 68 0 100.00% 98.55% 0.00% 0 1 0 0.00% 1.45% 0.00%

Block 144 ■ 9 9 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 145 20 16 4 100.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 146 25 8 17 100.00% 32.00% 68.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 147 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 149 4 4 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 150 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 151 0,0 0 0 0 0

Block 152 36 11 25 100.00% 30.56% 69.44% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group I 1,824 1,611 206 100.00% 88.32% 11.29% 2 4 I 0.11% 0.22% 0.05%

Block Group 2 Block 218 182 182 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% ooo 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 222 39 36 - 0 100.00% 92.31% 0.00% 0 0 3 0.00% 0.00% 7.69%

Total Block Group 2 221 218 0 100.00% 98.64% 0.00% 0 0 3 0.00% 0.00% 1.36%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ageá Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 52

Census Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Black Total Am. Ind, Total Total Asian/PI Other

Block Group 3

Block 301 • 90 100.00% 82 91.11% 8 8.89% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 302 87 35 52 0 0 0

100.00% 40.23% 59.77% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

. 100.00% 99.59% 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.41% 0 0.00%

Block 305 45 100.00% 45 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 306 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 307 13 100.00% 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 308 11 100.00% 11 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 309 26 100.00% 26 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 310 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 311 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 312 0 0 0 0 0

Block 313 0 0 0 0

Block 314 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 315 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 316 49 100.00% 49 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 317 115 100.00% 115 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 318 53 100.00% 53 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00# 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 319 14 100.00% 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 320 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 321 266 100.00% 265 99.62% 1 0.38% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 322 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 323 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 324 4 100.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 325 55 100.00% 55 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 53

Plan tvi?e: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am, Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 326 38 100.00% 38 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 327 12 100.00% 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%

Block 328 0 0 0 0 0

Block 329 • 39 100.00% 39 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 330 10 100.00% 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 331 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 332 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 333 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399D 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399F 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399G 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399H 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399J 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399K 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399L 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399M Water block 399N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 1,180 100.00% 1,114 94.41% 65 5.51% ' 0 0.00%

Block Group 9

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page:54

Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Total Total Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Total Other

Block 901A 0 0 0 0 0

Block 901B 191 100.00% 191 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 902 12 100.00% 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 903 • 17 100.00% 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 904 7 100.00% 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 905 11 100.00% 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 906 6 100.00% 6 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 907 87 100.00% 87 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 908 0 0 0 0 0 . 0

Block 909A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 909B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 910 35 100.00% 35 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00%

Block 911 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% ‘

Block 912 A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 912B 15 100.00% 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%

Block913 16 100.00% 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 914A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 914B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 914C 0 0 0 0

Block915A 0 0 0 0-

Block 915B 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Block Group 9 401 100.00% 401 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 0142.03 3,626 100.00% 3,344 92.22% 271 7.47% 5 0.14% 4 0.11%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 55

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Tract 0143.01

Block Group 4 Block 401A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 401B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 402 134 69 65 100.00% 51.49% 48.51% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 403A 0 o-o 0 0 0

Block 403B 61 58 2 100.00% 95.08% 3.28% 0 1 0 0.00% 1.64% 0.00%

Block 404 13 13 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 405 20 20 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 406 13 13 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0.0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 407 15 15 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 408 26 26 . 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 409 38 38 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block410 60 58 0 100.00% 96.67% 0.00% 1 1 0 1.67% 1.67% 0.00%

Block 411 42 42 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 412 A 10 10 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

BIock412B 22 22 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block413 10 10 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 414 25 25 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block415 63 63 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block416A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block416B 140 140 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 417 86 86 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block418 11 11 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 4 * 789 719 67 100.00% 91.13% 8.49% 1 2 0 0.13% 0.25% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Dale: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 56

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Total Tract 0143.01 789 100.00% 719 91.13% 67 8.49% 1 2 0.13% 0.25% 0 0.00%

Total EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY 4,791 4,434 100.00% 92.55% 343 7.16% 3 0.06% 7 0.15% 4 0.08%

FLINT HILL FIRE STATION 5,238 100.00% 3,111 59.39% 2,103 40.15% 0.15% 12 0.23% 4 0.08%

MCDONALD CHAPEL COMMUNITY 285 100.00% 39 13.68% • 245 85.96% 1 0.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

COOPER GREEN RECREATION CENTER 4,933 100.00% 37 0.75% 4,893 99.19% 1 0.02% 2 0.04% 0 0.00%

SEMMIE LAVENDER COMMUNITY CENTER 2,703 100.00% 161 5.96% 2,540 93.97% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 1 0.04%

CENTRAL PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9,152 100.00% 3,699 40.42% 5,418 59.20% 11 0.12% 18 0.20% 6 0.07%

LEE SCHOOL 2,869 100.00% 230 8.02% 2,633 91.77% 4 0.14% 2 0.07% 0 ‘ 0.00%

HARRISON PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 6,344 100.00% 191 3.01% 6,144 96.85% 2 0.03% 5 0.08% 2 * 0.03%

HEMPHILL SCHOOL RECREATION 6,250 100.00% 684 10.94% 5,545 88.72% 15 0.24% 1 0.02% 5 0.08%

WENONAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2,323 100.00% 314 13.52% 2,005 86.31% 3 0.13% 1 0.04% 0 0.00%

JACKSON SCHOOL 2,452 100.00% 22 . 0.90%' 2,421 98.74% 9 0.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

HELL SCHOOL 6,233 100.00% 505 8.10% 5,710 91.61% 14 0.22% 1 0.02% 3 0.05%

GRAYMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5,260 100.00% 147 2.79% 5,107 97.09% 3 0.06% 1 0.02% 2 0.04%

CENTER STREET SCHOOL 4,205 100.00% 74 1.76% 4,127 98.15% 3 0.07% 0 0.00% 1 0.02%

WASHINGTON SCHOOL 4,832 100.00% 20 0.41% 4,807 99.48% 3 0.06% 0 0.00% 2 0.04%

ELYTON SCHOOL 2,397 100.00% 227 9.47% 2,165 90.32% • 1 0.04% 3 0.13% 1 0.04%

FORTY-FIFTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH 1,591 100.00% 38 2.39% 1,550 97.42% 3 0.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

NORWOOD ARMORY 3,771 100.00% 146 3.87% 3,619 95.97% 4 0.11% 2 0.05% 0 0.00%

MCARTHUR SCHOOL 3,557 100.00% 516 14.51% 3,034 85.30% 3 0.08% 3 0.08% 1 0.03%

CITY AUDITORIUM 4,174 100.00% 19 0.46% 4,151 99.45% 2 0.05% 1 0.02% 1 0.02%

WILKERSON SCHOOL/5411 CARRIE TUGGL 3,271 100.00% 38 1.16% 3,217 98.35% 2 0.06% 7 0.21% 7 0.21%

AVONDALE LIBRARY 1,828 100.00% 914 50.00% 893 48.85% 5 0.27% 10 0.55% 6 0.33%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 57

Plan tvoe: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

SOUTHTOWN HOUSING COMMUNITY CENTER 1,280 100.00% 80 6.25% 1,193 93.20% 1 0.08% 2 0.16% 4 0.31%

BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH . • 715 100.00% 3 0.42% 706 98.74% 0 0.00% 6 0.84% 0 0.00%

SOUTHSIDE HOMES COMMUNITY 5,819 100.00% 93 1.60% 5,718 98.26% 5 0.09% 2 0.03% 1 0.02%

THOMPSON MANOR COMMUNITY 1,961 100.00% 1,357 69.20% 595 30.34% 5 0.25% 2 0.10% 2 0.10%

ST FRANCIS SCHOOL 6,090 100.00% 702 11.53% 5,376 88.28% 6 0.10% 0 0.00% 6 0.10%

BESSEMER CITY HALL 2,402 100.00% 1,578 65.70% 815 33.93% 6 0.25% 0 0.00% 3 0.12%

BESSEMER FIRE STATION 1,966 100.00% 591 30.06% 1,367 69.53% 3 0.15% 5 0.25% 0 0.00%

NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY 2,722 100.00% 414 15.21% 2,305 84.68% 2 0.07% 0 0.00% 1 0.04%

JONESBORO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6,349 100.00% 4,631 72.94% 1,703 26.82% 7 0.11% 3 0.05% 5 0.08%

ADDISON SCHOOL 743 100.00% 30 4.04% 713 95.96% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

WOODWARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1,854 100.00% 652 35.17% 1,197 64.56% 1 0.05% 3 0.16% 1 0.05%

FAIRFIELD CITY HALL 3,057 100.00% 1,105 36.15% 1,942 63.53% 1 0.03% 8 0.26% 1 0.03%

FAIRFIELD FIRE STATION 4,020 100.00% 115 2.86% 3,900 97.01% 4 0.10% 0 0.00% 1 0.02%

MIDFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER 2,973 100.00% .2,590 87.12% 354 11.91% 13 0.44% 16 0.54% 0 0.00%

BRIGHTON HIGH SCHOOL 1,771 100.00% 69 3.90% 1,701 96.05% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 0 0.00%

ROOSEVELT SCHOOL 2,511 100.00% 56 2.23% 2,452 97.65% 2 0.08% 1 0.04% 0 0.00%

LIPSCOMB CITY HALL 3,049 100.00% 1,564 51.30% 1,475 48.38% 2 0.07% 8 0.26% 0 0.00%

BRYANTS CHAPEL AME CHURCH 4,317 100.00% 38 0.88% 4,279 99.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

RILEY SCHOOL 5,401 100.00% 398 7.37% 4,986 92.32% 1 0.02% 14 0.26% 2 0.04%

FIRE STATION 29 9,112 100.00% 5,371 58.94% 3,717 40.79% 14 0.15% 6 0.07% 4 0.04%

CURRY SCHOOL 4,419 100.00% 2,824 63.91% 1,560 35.30% 4 0.09% 22 0.50% 9 0.20%

WELLOWWOOD RECREATION CENTER 5,559 100.00% 1,031 18.55% 4,484 80.66% 16 0.29% 20 0.36% 8 0.14%

AL YOUTH SERVICES VACCA 3,092 100.00% 1,425 46.09% 1,643 53.14% 0 0.00% 19 0.61% 5 0.16%

OPORTO ARMORY/5801 TARRANT CITY HA 4,144 100.00% 205 4.95% 3,937 95.00% I 0.02% 0 0.00% I 0.02%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned lo a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 58

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Black Total Am, Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

INGLENOOK SCHOOL/5910 MT PARK FIRS 2,570 60.61% 2 0.05% 3 0.07% 15 0.35%

MORTON SIMPSON COMMUNITY CENTER 4,814 87.32% 3 0.05% T 0.02% 1 0.02%

HUDSON SCHOOL 3,600 99.89% 2 0.06% 2 0.06% 0 0.00%

NORTH BHAM RECREATION CENTER 3,121 86.00% 2 0.06% 2 0.06% 0 0.00%

WRIGHTS CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST 2,657 98.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.07%

HOOPER CITY RECREATION CENTER 2,357 99.79% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 2 0.08%

LEWIS SCHOOL I,457 99.93% 0 0.00% 1 0.07% 0 0.00%

HARRIMAN PARK RECREATION 612 99.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

MOUNT HEBRON BAPTIST CHURCH 4,042 89.94% 1 0.02% 1 0.02% 0 0.00%

WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL 4,841 73.30% 3 0.05% ■ 28 0.42% 5 0.08%

FAIRVIEW SCHOOL 4,737 • 76.80% 17 0.28% 11 0.18% 2 0.03%

ENSLEY HIGH SCHOOL GYM 3,755 97.63% 2 0.05% 9 0.23% 0 0.00%

EAST ENSLEY BRANCH PUBLIC LIBRARY 2,697 99.15% 1 0.04% 7 0.26% 0 0.00%

HOWZE SANFORD RECREATION 1,827 98.28% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

PRATT CITY FIRE STATION 2,261 83.99% 0 0.00% 3 0.11% 0 0.00%

GEORGE N SCOTT SCHOOL 4,468 97.47% 0 0.00% 6 0.13% 1 0.02%

Total Jefferson County 195,135 75.48% 252 0.10% 346 0.13% 152 0.06%

Lowndes County 12,658 100.00% 3,185 25.16% 9,456 74.70% 10 0.08% 4 0.03% 3 0.02%

Marengo County 23,084 100.00% 11,314 49.01% II,745 50.88% 11 0.05% 11 0.05% 3 0.01%

Montgomery County

NORMANDALE LIBRARY

Tract 0022

Block Group 3 Block 301 30 3 27 100.00% 10.00% 90.00% 0 0 0 0.00 % 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned lo a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 59

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 311 53 100.00% 52 98.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Block Group 3 83 100.00% 79 95.18% 0 0.00% '0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract Ó022 83 100.00% 4 4.82% 79 95.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total NORMANDALE LIBRARY 83 100.00% 4 4.82% . 79 95.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

BELLINGRATH COMMUNITY CENTER 2,277 100.00% 102 2,166 95.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 0.40%

BEULAH BAPTIST CHURCH 8.252 100.00% 380 4.60% 7,861 95.26% 3 0.04% 2 0.02% 6 0.07%

CARVER HIGH SCHOOL 3,535 100.00% 43 1.22% 3,478 98.39% 4 0.11% 6 0.17% 4 0.11%

CAPITAL CITY BOVS CLUB 3.524 100.00% 387 10.98% 3,103 88.05% 8 0.23% 17 0.48% 9 0.26%

MONTGOMERY BOYS CLUB 2,472 100.00% 1,198 1,249 50.53% 6 024% 16 0.65% 3 0.12%

HAYNEVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CENTER 3,177 100.00% 320 10.07% 2,847 89.61% 5 0.16% 5 0.16% 0 0.00%

FORT SHEPERD ARMORY 3,013 100.00% 374 12.41% 2,635 87.45% 0 0.00% 3 0.10% 1 0.03%

WILLIAM HARRISON ELEMENTARY 1,688 100.00% 145 8.59% 1,540 91.23% 1 0.06% 1 0.06% 0.06% *

SOUTHLAWN ELEMENTARY 5,345 100.00% 157 2.94% 5,179 96.89% 2 0.04% 4 0.07% 3 0.06%

HOUSTON HILL COMMUNITY CENTER 3,648 100.00% 406 11.13% 3,228 88.49% 13 0.36% 1 0.03% 0 0.00%

ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY 4,151 100.00% 480 11.56% 3,652 87.98% 7 0.17% 9 0.22% 3 0.07%

HAMNER HALL FIRE STATION 2.524 100.00% 499 19.77% 1,999 79.20% 12 12 0.48% 2 0.08%

GOODE STREET SCHOOL 5,764 100.00% 394 6.84% 5,355 92.90% 2 0.03% 8 0.14% 5 0.09%

MCINTYRE COMMUNITY CENTER 4,767 67 1.41% 4,697 98.53% 3 0.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

NEWTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER 4.252 1,111 26.13% 3,115 73.26% 7 0.16% 16 0.38% 3 0.07%

NORTH COMMUNITY CENTER 5,882 100.00% 2,165 36.81% 3,664 62.29% 8 0.14% 40 0.68% 5 0.09%

UNION ACADEMY BAPTIST CHURCH 323 100.00% 121 37.46% 202 62.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

UNION CHAPEL AME ZION CHURCH 1,599 100.00% 559 34.96% 1,036 64.79% 3 0.19% 1 0.06% 0 0.00%

KING HILL COMMUNITY CENTER 1,687 100.00% 712 42.21% 958 56.79% 4 0.24% 13 0.77% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 60

Census Unit Total Pop. Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

CATOMA SCHOOL 1,975 100.00% 267 13.52% 6 0.30% 10 0.51% I 0.05%

HOPE HULL CHURCH OF CHRIST ' 718 100.00% 354 49.30% 1 0.14% 2 0.28% 13 1.81%

CLUB 565 100.00% 338 59.82% 4 0.71% 1 0

NEWELL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 1,064 100.00% 311 29.23% 2 0.19% 0 0.00% 5 0.47%

FLETA MASONIC LODGE 1,431 100.00% 558 38.99% 4 0.28% 2 0.14% 0 0.00%

CENTER 1,000 100.00% 420 42.00% 0 0.00% 3 0.30% 0 0.00%

ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER

Tract 0058

Block Group 1

Block 101 39 5 100.00% 12.82% 34 0 87.18% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 102 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 103 14 14 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 104 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 105 3 ■ 3 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 106 93 20 100.00% 21.51% 73 0 78.49% 0.00% 0 0.00% ■ 0 0.00%

Block 107 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 109 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 119 176 120 100.00% 68.18% 56 0 31.82% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 120 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 121 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 123 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 152 13 0 100.00% 0.00% 13 0 100.00% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 153 - 39 36 100.00% 92.31% 3 0 7.69% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 District? Time: 3:16p.m. Total Populations, All Ages page: ¿¡l

Census Unit Total Total Total ' Total Total Total Pop. White Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 154 0 0 0 0 0 0

Waier block 199C 0 0 0 0 O 0

Waier block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block‘199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Waier block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Waier block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block I99C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Waier block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block I99C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0-0 0 0 0 0

Water block I99C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block I99C . 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 1 377 198 179 100.00% 52.52% 47.48% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 2 Block 206 0 0 0 0 0

Block 207 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 208 80 100.00% 50 62.50% 30 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 217 141 100.00% 44 31.21% 93 65.96% 4 2.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block Group 3

Block 309 26 100.00% 26 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA 'Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District? Total Populations, AH Ages. Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 62

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind, Total Astan/PI Total Other

Block 218 0 0 0 0 0

Block 219 27 100.00% 5 18.52% 22 81.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 220 7 100.00% 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0

Block 221 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 222 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 223 18 100.00% 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 224 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 225 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Water block 299E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299F 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299G 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299H 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 2 281 100.00% 132 46.98% 145 51.60% 4 0 1.42% 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 302 50 40 10 100.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 303 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 304 57 100.00% 48 84.21% 9 15.79% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 305 18 100.00% 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 306 7 100.00% 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 307 5 100.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 308 10 100.00% 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 310 0 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District? Total Populations, All Ages ' Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 63

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 311 15 15 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00%. 0.00%

Block 312 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 313 29 26 3 100.00% 89.66% 10.34% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 314 • 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 322 1 1 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 324 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 325 1 1 0 0 0 0

100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 326 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 327 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 328 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 329 . 0 0.0 0 0 0

Block 330 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 331 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399B 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399C 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 219 196 23 100.00% 89.50% 10.50% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 4

Block 401 30 28 2 100.00% 93.33% 6.67% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 402 5 5 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Water block 499G 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 4 35 33 2 100.00% 94.29% 5.71% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 0058 912 559 349 100.00% 61.29% 38.27% 4 0 0 0.44% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 64

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Total ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER * 912 100.00% 559 61.29% 349 38.27% 4 0.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Montgomery County 75,623 100.00% 14,634 19.35% 60,640 80.18% 109 0.14% 172 0.23% 73 0.10%

Peny County 12,759 100.00% 4,503 35.29% 8,219 64.42% 16 0.13% 14 0.11% 7 0.05%

Pickens County COCHRANE 587 100.00% 171 29.13% 416 70.87% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

ETHELS VILLE ■ 408 100.00% 47 11.52% 361 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

CARROLLTON

Tract 9879

Block Group 3 Block 306B 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%‘

Total Block Group 3 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 9879 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total CARROLLTON 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

PINE GROVE 174 100.00% 106 60.92% 68 39.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

SPRING HILL 126 100.00% 46 36.51% 80 63.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

PICKENSVILLE 702 100.00% 204 29.06% 497 70.80% I 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

SAPPS

Tract 9879

Block Group 3 Block 311 248-100.00% 35 14.11% 213 85.89% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 312

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 65

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 314 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 320 31 100.00% 24 77.42% 7 22.58% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

73 100.00% 16 21.92% 57 78.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 322 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 323 66 100.00% 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 324 17 100.00% 0 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

100.00% 0.00% 140 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

0 0 0 0 0 • 0

Water block 399D 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399E 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399F 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399G 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399H 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399J 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399K 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 575 100.00% 75 13.04% 500 86.96% Q 0.00% 0 0.00% Q 0.00%

Block Group 4 Block 439 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 440 119 100.00% 20 16.81% 99 83.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Block 469 17 100.00% 17 100.00% 0 0.00% „ 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 470 3 100.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

0 0 0 0 0 0

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages • Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 66

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Water block 499X 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 4 167 100.00% 40 23.95% 127 76.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 9879 742 100.00% 115 15.50% 627 84.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total SAPPS 742 100.00% 115 15.50% 627 84.’50% 0 ' 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Total Pickens County 2,742 100.00% 692 25.24% 2,049 74.73% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Sumter County 16,174 100.00% 4,759 ' 29.42% 11,369 7029% 6 0.04% 30 0.19% 10 0.06%

Tuscaloosa County

STILLMAN COLLEGE 9,591 100.00% 419 4.37% 9,159 95.50% 8 0.08% 3 0.03% 2 0.02%

MCDONALD HUGHES COMM CENTER 3,599 100.00% 17 0.47% 3,578 99.42% 2 0.06% 0 0.00% 2 0.06%

ARMY RESERVE CENTER 9,021 100.00% 4,219 46.77% 4,736 52.50% ‘ 11 0.12% 38 0.42% 17 0.19%

BAMAMALL 9,714 100.00% 5,805 50.76% 3,804 39.16% 24 0.25% 65 0.67% 16 0.16%

REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER

Tract 0104.03

Block Group I

Block 101A 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 10IB 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 101C 10 100.00% 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 102 198 100.00% 160 80.81% 35 17.68% 0 0.00% 3 1.52% 0 0.00%

Block 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 104A 262 100.00% 187 71.37% 74 28.24% 0 0.00% 1 0.38% 0 0.00%

Block 104B 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 104C

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District? Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 67

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Pop. Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Block 105 139 100.00% 42 30.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 106 12 100.00% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% .0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 107 16 100.00% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 108 82 100.00% 68 82.93% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 109 24 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 110 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 111 72 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 112 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 113 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 .0.00%

Block 114 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 115 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 116 20 100.00% 4 20.00% 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 117 62 100.00% 55 88.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 118 25 100.00% 19 76.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 119 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 120 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Block 121 0 0 0 0 0

Block 122 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 1 1,012 100.00% 702 69.37% 306 30.24% 0 0.00% 4 0.40% 0 0.00%

Total Tract 0104.03 1,012 100.00% 702 69.37% 306 30.24% 0 0.00% 4 0.40% 0 0.00%

Block Group 1 Block 102 34 100.00% 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 68

Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 103 25 0 25 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 104 32 1 31 100.00% 3.13% 96.88% 0-0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 105 49 2 47 100.00% 4.08% 95.92% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 106 ■ 10 0 10 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 107 8 0 8 100.00% 0.00% 100:00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 108 43 0 43 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 109 21 0 21 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 110 13 0 13 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 111 24 1 23 100.00% 4.17% 95.83% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 112 19 1 18 100.00% 5.26% 94.74% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 113 93 0 93 100.00% 0.00% • 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 114 38 0 38 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 115 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 116 31 0 31 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 117 15 0 15 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 118 16 0 16 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Block Group 1 471 5 466 100.00% 1.06% 98.94% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 2 Block 201 17 1 16 100.00% 5.88% 94.12% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 202 77 0 77 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 203 36 0 36 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 204 67 0 67 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 205 '14 0 14 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District? Total Populations, AH Age? Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 69

Plan tvpc: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Total Pop. White Black Total Total Total Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other

Block 206 16 0 16 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 207 96 0 96 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 .0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 208 5 0 5 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 209 25 0 25 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 210 102 5 97 100.00% 4.90% 95.10% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 211 110 3 107 100.00% 2.73% 97.27% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 212 30 0 30 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 213 1 0 1 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 214 37 7 30 100.00% 18.92% 81.08% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% .0.00%

Block 215 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 299 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 2 633 16 617 100.00% 2.53% 97.47% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block Group 3 Block 310 0 0 0 6 o o

Block 311 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 312 - 7 1 6 100.00% 14.29% 85.71% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 317 14 0 14 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 318 7 0 7 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Block 319 0 0 0 0 0 0

Block 323 0 0 0 0 0 0

Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Block Group 3 28 1 27 100.00% 3.57% 96.43% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Total Tract 0104.04 1,132 22 U10 100.00% 1.94% 98.06% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

DB: ALABAMA Plan: REDISTRICT Units Assigned to a District District 7 Total Populations, All Ages Date: 1/21/92 Time: 3:16 p.m. Page: 70

Plan tvne: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

Census Unit Total Total Pop. White Total Black Total Am. Ind. Total Asian/PI Total Other

Total REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER 2,144 724 100.00% 33.77% 1,416 66.04% 0 0.00% 4 0.19% 0 0.00%

MCFARLAND MALL 13,467 100.00% 10,532 78.21% 2,726 20.24% 19 0.14% 172 1.28% 18 0.13%

COTTONDALE METHODIST CHURCH 3,492 100.00% 3,447 98.71% 39 1.12% 2 0.06% 1 0.03% 3 0.09%

COALING COMMUNITY CENTER 2,476 100.00% 2.203 88.97% 247 9.98% 21 0.85% 5 0.20% 0 0.00%

VANCE COMMUNITY CENTER 1,519 100.00% 1,491 98.16% 28 1.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

MASONIC LODGE/BUCKSVILLE BAPTIST/L 4,398 100.00% 4,176 94.95% 204 4.64% 13 0.30% 5 0.11% 0 0.00%

BF GOODRICH UNION HALL 972 100.00% 518 53.29% 453 46.60% 0 0.00% 1 0.10% 0 0.00%

H3LLCREST HIGH 3,276 100.00% 2,727 83.24% 531 16.21% 7 0.21% 11 0.34% 0 0.00%

BIG SANDY BAPTIST CHURCH 2,302 100.00% 1,547 67.20% 751 32.62% 3 0.13% 1 0.04% 0 0.00%

DUNCANVILLE CHURCH/COMMUNITY CENTE 3,212 100.00% 3,072 95.64% 131 4.08% 3 0.09% 2 0.06% 4 0.12%

Total Tuscaloosa County 69,183 100.00% 40,897 59.11% 27,803 40.19% 113 0.16% 308 0.45% 62 0.09%

Wilcox County 13,568 100.00% 4.203 30.98% 9,353 68.93% 6 0.04% 6 0.04% 0 0.00%

Total District 7 577,227 100.00% 185,454 32.13% 389,796 67.53% 599 0.10% 1,045 0.18% 333 0.06%

HAND, Senior District Judge, concurring in judgment:

I concur in the Judgment and Order of the Court for the reasons expressed therein, except as noted below, but I write separately to emphasize a point which the opinion does not address as squarely as I feel it should. Accepting as fact the statements contained in the stipulation of the parties that this State has a substantial African-American minority that is relatively geographically compact so as to comprise a minority district which complies with the population equality requirement of Karcher v. Daggett, 462 U.S. 725, 103 S.Ct. 2653, 77 L.Ed.2d 133 (1983), and no evidence or argument being presented that the establishment of such a district would violate any requirement of the law, I agree with the decision to accept the parties’ joint request for the creation of such a district as a remedy and as a remedy only. In so doing, my concurrence should in no way be considered as an agreement that such a result is constitutionally mandated. It simply is not.

Those in high and low places who advocate racial gerrymandering to create African-American congressional districts would do well to remember the reasoned dissents of the first Mr. Justice Harlan wherein he stated in Plessy v. Ferguson: “There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.” 163 U.S. 537, 558, 16 S.Ct. 1138, 1146, 41 L.Ed. 256 (1895); and of Mr. Justice William O. Douglas who later addressed this point with an equally persuasive dissent in Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52, 59-67, 84 S.Ct. 603, 606-11, 11 L.Ed.2d 512 (1964):

Here no Negroes are deprived of the franchise. Rather, zigzag tortuous lines are drawn to concentrate Negroes and Puerto Ricans into Manhattan’s Eighteenth Congressional District and practically to exclude them from the Seventeenth Congressional District.
The intervenors are persons who apparently have a vested interest in control of the segregated Eighteenth District. [footnote $ 4: Adam Clayton Powell has represented the Eighteenth District in Congress since 1945] They and the State seem to support this segregation not on the “separate but equal” theory of Ples-sy v. Ferguson but on another theory. Their theory might be called the theory of “separate but better of” — a theory that has been used before.
Here the individual is important, not his race, his creed, or his color. The principle of equality is at war with the notion that District A must be represented by a Negro, as it is with the notion that District B must be represented by a Caucasian, District C by a Jew, District D by a Catholic, and so on.... That system, by whatever name it is called, is a divisive force in a community, emphasizing differences between candidates and voters that are irrelevant in the constitutional sense. Of course race, like religion, plays an important role in the choices which individual voters make from among various candidates, [footnote omitted]. But government has no business designing electoral districts along racial or religious lines.
When racial or religious lines are drawn by the State, the multiracial, mul-tireligious communities that our Constitution seeks to weld together as one becomes separatist; antagonisms that relate to race or to religion rather than to political issues are generated; communities seek not the best representative but the best racial or religious partisan. Since that system is at war with the democratic ideal, it should find no footing here.
“Separate but equal” and “separate but better off” have no more place in voting districts than they have in schools, parks, railroad terminals, or any other facility serving the public.

As I perceive it, the chief danger, which these Justices recognized and so eloquently articulated, is judicial and legislative ghettoizing of the vote. The resulting balkani-zation is antithetical to the American dream, and I do not wish to be associated with any such action or effort, thus I write separately to this point. 
      
      . Ala.Code §§ 17-16-6 to -11 (Supp.1990).
     
      
      . The Reock Test indicates that the Reed Plan contains a district which is the least compact of any of the 35 districts analyzed by the Reapportionment Office. The Reed Plan’s District 1 has a Reock Test measurement with less than 0.2 and by comparison, the average of the Pierce districts under the Reock Test is 0.41.
      The Reock Test is a relatively simple method of measuring the relationship between the area of the district and the area of the smallest possible circumscribing circle. The resulting measure is a number between 1 to 0, with numbers closer to one being more compact. See Karcher v. Dagget, 462 U.S. 725, 756-57, 103 S.Ct. 2653, 2673-74, 77 L.Ed.2d 133 (1983).
     
      
      . It was argued that the Legislature was unable to fulfill its obligation to redistrict because the census information it received in February 1991 might be subject to correction. This argument fails because the Supreme Court has previously indicated that the fact that the latest correction of the census is not available at the time the problem is addressed is of no moment to that effort. Karcher v. Dagget, 462 U.S. 725, 729, 103 S.Ct. 2653, 2657-58, 77 L.Ed.2d 133 (1983).
     
      
      . The Alabama law establishes the qualifying date for upcoming primary elections at April 3, 1992, and as noted supra, the ability of the Legislature to preclear its newly adopted plan appears illusory. Those who may desire to seek congressional office, and who must qualify by April 3, 1992, are left in a quandary as to what will be their district, when they are to qualify, when will the primaries actually be conducted, and, potentially, whether an election will be held at all. In addition to candidates being left in such a. quandary, certain requirements of the law impact on the election officials, including the Probate Judges and others, who must conduct these elections. Lastly, the voters are impacted by the effect of potential delays as it affects the quality of their representation in the national legislature. For these reasons, this court finds that there is an emergency that requires judicial attention under the law in order to provide adequate relief for all affected, including the plaintiff. Since this is so, it becomes necessary for the court to consider an appropriate plan in light of the judicial standards imposed in drafting such plans as against those that might be considered by a legislature. Chapman v. Meier, 420 U.S. 1, 95 S.Ct. 751, 42 L.Ed.2d 766 (1975); Connor v. Finch, 431 U.S. 407, 97 S.Ct. 1828, 52 L.Ed.2d 465 (1977).
     
      
      . Precise population equality is a demanding standard requiring the states to “justify each variance no matter how small.” Karcher, 462 U.S. at 730, 103 S.Ct. at 2658 (quoting Kirkpatrick, 394 U.S. at 530-31, 89 S.Ct. at 1229 (citations omitted)). See Hastert v. State Bd. of Elections, 777 F.Supp. 634 (N.D.Ill.1991) (rejecting a plan with a .00297% population deviation because the plan’s proponent could not justify its equality inferiority in comparison with another submitted plan with a .00017% deviation).
      The advancement of information processing technologies in the last decade since Karcher have raised the deviation standard to an "absolute population equality,” giving greater authority to the Court’s 1983 statement that “rapid advances in computer technology and education during the last two decades make it relatively simply to draw contiguous districts of equal population and at the same time to further whatever secondary goals the state has.” Karcher, 462 U.S. at 732, 103 S.Ct. at 2659.
     
      
      . Some of these parties argue that the population deviations in their plans can be zeroed out easily. This may be so, but we remind the parties that this type of computation is not this court’s responsibility. If a party wishes to propose a plan for adoption by a court, then it is incumbent upon that party to fashion a plan that comports with the law.
     
      
      . When no plan submitted to a court fully comports with objectives and criteria that should be incorporated in a judicially approved plan, a court should fashion its own plan to satisfy relevant legal criteria and incorporate the most desirable aspects of the plans presented to the court. Carstens v. Lamm, 543 F.Supp. 68 (D.C.Colo.1982).
     
      
      . Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c, requires a governmental body to obtain preclearance of a proposed plan either by securing a declaratory judgment from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or by submitting the change to the Attorney General of the United States. As long as the Attorney General has not interposed an objection within sixty days after such submission, the state may enforce the change.
     