
    Lancaster v. Johns.
    June 17, 1913.
    Cancellation of deed. Before Judge Martin. Dodge superior court. March 6, 1912.
    
      Roberts & Smith and Wooten & Griffin, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. M. Clements and J. A. Neese, contra.
   Hill, J.

While some • of the evidence admitted over objection was of doubtful materiality, it was not of such a character as to require a new trial. There were no reversible errors of law committed on the trial, and the evidence supported the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.  