
    15987.
    Pearson v. The State.
    Decided January 13, 1925.
    Conviction of manufacture of liquor; from Coweta superior court —Judge Eoop. October 9, 1924'.
    
      Post & Arnold, for plaintiff in error.
    TP. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, contra.
   LTjke, J.

The evidence in this ease almost demanded, if indeed it did not demand, the defendant’s conviction. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, in the light of the record, are without merit. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.  