
    Worthington vs. Western and Atlantic Railroad.
    [Jackson, C. J., not presiding.]
    1. Where the bill of exceptions states that the certiorari was sustained on a special ground, but the order contained in the record sustains the certiorari generally, without specifying any reason therefor, the latter will control.
    2. There was no abuse of discretion in sustaining the certiorari and ordering a new trial in this case, the evidence being conflicting.
    Judgment affirmed.
    December 2, 1884.
   Hall, Justice.  