
    [Sac. No. 3337.
    In Bank.
    November 14, 1921.]
    MADALYNNE C. OBENCHAIN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.
    
       Mandamus—Denial by District Court of Appeal—Remedy in Supreme Court.'—Where a petition for a writ of mandate is denied by the district court of appeal, the remedy of the petitioner in the supreme court is by way of petition within the sixty days allowed by the constitution for an order vacating the judgment of the district court and directing a rehearing of the ease in the supreme court.
    APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus. Denied.
    The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
    Cooper, Collings & Shreve, Charles E. Erbstein and Ralph Obenchain for Petitioner,
   THE COURT.

[1] The petition for a writ of mandate herein, directed to the superior court of Log Angeles County, to compel said court to dismiss and quash the indictment pending therein against petitioner or to grant her an immediate trial of said cause, is denied upon the ground that the remedy of the petitioner in this court, after denial of her petition for such mandate in the district court of appeal, is by way of petition to this cotirt, within the sixty days allowed by the constitution, for an order vacating the judgment of the district court and directing a rehearing of the ease in this court.  