
    McCAULAY v. STATE.
    (No. 3316.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 11, 1914.)
    1. Criminal Law (§ 1124) — Appea:l—Bill of Exceptions — Statement of Facts — Necessity.
    Questions presented in the motion of accused for a new trial cannot be reviewed, where there are no bills of exception in the record or statement of facts accompanying it.
    I Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Gent. Big. §§ 2939, 2946-2948; Dec. Dig. § 1124.]
    2. Criminal Law (§ 1122) — Appeal-Request to Charge — Refusal—Review.
    Refusal of requests to charge cannot be reviewed, where the evidence introduced at the trial is not brought up.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2940-2945; Dec. Dig. § 1122.]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robert B. Seay, Judge.
    Daniel McCaulay was convicted of aggravated assault, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER, in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $250 and 60 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

There are no bills of exception in the record to the admissibility or rejection of any testimony. Neither does any statement of facts accompany the record. Consequently, no question is presented in the motion for new.trial we can review.

A number of special charges were requested, but without the evidence before us we cannot say whether or not they should have been given.

The judgment is affirmed.  