
    Commonwealth ex rel. Keegan v. Keegan, Appellant.
    Argued June 14, 1965.
    Before Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, and Hoffman, JJ. (Ervin, P. J.,. and Flood, J., absent).
    
      July 19, 1965:
    
      I. Raymond Kremer, for appellant.
    
      Albert Ring, with him D’Agui & Del Gollo, for appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

The record contains sufficient evidence to corroborate the fact of adultery confessed by the wife. The continued association of relatrix with the person who is alleged to have ravished her is in itself sufficient to indicate her relations with him were voluntary. I think she has forfeited her right to support from the defendant.

Therefore, I respectfully dissent.  