
    Krause vs. Cutting.
    1. A general verdict “ for the plaintiff” finds all the issues in his favor.
    2. Thus, in replevin, where both Ms title and his right of possession were in issue, a verdict “ for the plaintiff” (assessing the value and damages for the detention), determined that he was the owner and entitled to the ■ possession.
    
      APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Dunn County.
    
      S. W. Sunt and S. B. Bundy, for appellant.
    
      F. J. McLean, for respondent.
   [Tbe opinion in tbis case bas been lost from tbe files.]  