
    David Dise, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.
    Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.
    Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.
    Manheim & Manheim, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

There is a preponderance of evidence in plaintiff’s favor, proving that the injuries complained of were caused him, by reason of defendant’s negligence, and that he was not giiilty of contributory negligence.

The verdict of the jury in so finding must be sustained. No error, in- our opinion, was committed upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.  