
    Samuel Nathanson, respondent, v. Elizabeth C. Norton, appellant.
    [Argued June 23d, 1916.
    Decided November 20th, 1916.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    
      Mr. Aaron V. Dawes, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. McDermott <& Enright, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This ease is controlled by the decision of No. 19 at this term. The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.

For reversal — None.  