
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TIEN THE LE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-10020
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted August 16, 2016 
    
    FILED August 22, 2016
    Jason Hitt, Jill M. Thomas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSAC-Office of the US Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Tien The Le, Pro Se.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Tien The Le appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Le’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Le the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     