
    In the Matter of Carolyn Herrington, Appellant, v Aetna Insurance Company, Respondent.
    [644 NYS2d 992]
   The Supreme Court erred in holding that the reduction in coverage clause was enforceable (see, Matter of Paolilli v Aetna Ins. Co., 228 AD2d 683 [decided herewith]). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.  