
    Abt v. The State of Ohio.
    
      Supreme Court—Dismissals—No constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 18043
    Decided November 13, 1923.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
    
      Mr. Charles. F. Bolle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Murphy & Joseph; Mr. J. A. White and Mr. Chas. M. Earhart, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered by the court that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed on motion of defendant in error on the grounds that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Cause dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.  