
    Canal-Boat Odd Fellow v. Stewart and Another.
    Attachment against a canal-boat for articles furnished, for the boat at the request of the master. Attachment was served on the boat and notice given the master. The justice’s record shows a bond, of the same date as the attachment, executed by the master and if., conditioned for the payment of all demands which might be adjudged in said cause due, which was approved by the justice. The transcript does not show any use made of the bond. No motion was made for the discharge of the boat, nor was the boat discharged. Judgment against the boat. Appeal to the Circuit Court. The defendant moved to dismiss, on the ground that no judgment could be rendered against the boat, which motion was overruled, and judgment rendered against the master for the plaintiff’s demand, to be levied of the said canal-boat. Held, that the case stood as if no bond had been given. Held, also, that the motion to dismiss was properly overruled. Held, also, that the judgment of the Circuit Court was substantially good.
    ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
    
      Monday, October 28.
   Blackford, J.

An attachment was issued against the canal-boat Odd Fellow, by a justice of the peace. The suit was founded on an account for articles furnished for the boat at the request of one Logan, then master of the boat.

The attachment was returned served on the boat and notice given to one McGuire, master, then in possession.

There is a bond, of the same date with the attachment, copied into the justice’s record, executed by said McGuire and one Hull, conditioned for the payment of all demands which should be adjudged in said cause to be due. That bond appears to have been approved of by the justice. The transcript, however, does not show that any use was made of the bond. No motion was made before the justice for a discharge of the boat; nor was it discharged. The case therefore stands as if no bond had been given. The cause" proceeded, before the justice, to judgment against the boat.

There was an appeal, on the application of said McGuire, to the Circuit Court.

In the Circuit Court, the defendant moved to dismiss the case, on the ground that no judgment could be rendered against the boat. This motion was correctly overruled; the boat not having been discharged.

A. M. Crane and E. II. Brackett, for the plaintiff.

R. C. Gregory, for the defendants.

The cause was afterwards submitted by the parties to the Court, and judgment rendered against said Logan for the amount of the plaintiffs’ demand, to be levied of the said canal-boat, Odd Fellow. That is, substantially, a judgment against the boat.

We have examined the evidence, which is in the record, and are of opinion that it sustains the judgment.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.  