
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Hugo MADRIGAL-DAVILA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-41025
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 21, 2015.
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the judgment in a criminal ease, Victor Hugo Madrigal-Davila raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. Accordingly, Madrigal-Davila’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir.' R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     