
    Will of Razall: Razall, Appellant, vs. Razall and others, Respondents.
    
    
      March 14
    
    June 6, 1944.
    
    The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of Lorens & Neubauer of Milwaukee, for the respondent Bernard F. Mathiowetz on the brief of Bernard F. Mathiowetz of Milwaukee, in pro. per., and for the respondent Catherine Razall Kaufmann on the brief of Hammersley, Torke & Kelley of Milwaukee.
    
      
       Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on September 12,1944.
    
   Fairchild, J.

While Mr. Justice Fritz was still on the circuit court, issues in the divorce action were before him. Therefore, he is not sitting in the consideration of this appeal.

The remaining members of the court are equally divided. Mr. Justice Wickhem, Mr. Justice Martin, and the writer are of the opinion that the order should be reversed. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fowler, and Mr. Justice Barlow are of the opinion that the order should be affirmed.

Under the rule, the order appealed from is affirmed.

-By the Court. — Order affirmed.  