
    Hawks v. The State.
    Argued November 21,
    Decided December 21, 1905
   Beck, J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence; and, there being-no error of law complained of, the trial judge did not err in refusing to. grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Indictment for seduction — conviction of fornication. Before Judge Holden. Madison superior court. October 21, 1905.

J. F. L. Bond and J. JE: Gordon, for plaintiff in error.

D. W. Meadow, solicitor-general, contra.  