
    Stoddard v. Hays et ux.
    
    
      Appeal from Louisa District Court.
    
    Friday, January 10, 1862.
    The material facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
   Baldwin, C. J.

The complainant seeks to redeem certain real estate sold under a mortgage, executed by Burris and wife, to defendant. Stoddard, subsequent to the date of said mortgage obtained a judgment against Burris, but prior to the sale under the foreclosure. Upon the authority of Kramer v. Rebman, 9 Iowa 115, neither the mortgagor nor his judgment creditor can redeem after a sale of such a foreclosure. The decree of the District Court is therefore reversed.

Jacob Butler for the appellants.

No appearance for the appellee.  