
    The Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company v. Head.
    No. 7241.
    Supreme Court. — Assignment of Error. — Names of Parties. — Dismissal.— Where the paper purporting to be the assignment of errors does not set forth the names of the parties, as required by Rule 1 of the Supreme Court, the appeal will be dismissed.
    From the Lawrence Circuit Court.
    
      T. J. Jackson, JR. H. Young and L. G. Walker, for appellant.
    
      A. C. Voris, M T. Dunn,-Riley and W. H. Edwards, for appellee.
   "Worden, J.

In this case there are two papers, one at the commencement and one at the conclusion of the transcript, purporting to be assignments of error, but neither of them sets forth the names of the parties at all, as required by Rule 1 of this court. Eor this reason, the appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion must be sustained. The State, ex rel. Childers, v. Delano, 84 Ind. 52.

Opinion filed at May term, 1880.

Petition for a rehearing overruled at November term, 1880.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.  