
    Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Culp.
    No. 4320.
    February 26, 1925.
    Petition for injunction. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. March 11, 1924.
    ■ Randolph, Parker & Fortson, for plaintiff.
    
      Samuel L. Fplan and George & John D. Westmoreland, for defendant.
   Atkinson, J.

1. The sanction of a petition for certiorari and the grant of the writ operate as a supersedeas, under the Civil Code (1910), § 5191, only until the certiorari is heard in the superior court; and if on the hearing in that court the writ is denied, the supersedeas ends and the inferior court may proceed. Loeb v. Mangum, 134 Ga. 335 (67 S. E. 882). On the general subject see 11 C. J. 170, § 236. If the party . aggrieved takes the ease to the Court of Appeals, in order to obtain a further supersedeas he must comply with the law authorizing such supersedeas. Civil Code (1910), § 6165. The case differs from Russell v. O’Dowd, 48 Ga. 474. That case did not involve application of the statute, but related to the effect of an order of the court expressly directing a stay of execution.

2. Where a party against whom a judgment is rendered as indicated in the first division fails, on taking the case from the superior court to the Court of Appeals, to obtain a supersedeas by complying with the requirements of the Civil Code (1910), § 6165, the plaintiff in judgment can proceed to enforce the judgment; and consequently the defendant, upon tender of a bond to be approved by the court, would not be entitled to an injunction to prevent enforcement until disposition of the ease by the Court of Appeals or until the termination of garnishment proceedings instituted against the defendant by creditors of the plaintiff, nor to an injunction to prevent such plaintiff from inducing his creditors to institute garnishment proceedings against the defendant for the amount due to the plaintiff.

Judgment a,¡firmed.

All the Justices concur.  