
    Dadirrian v. Theodorian.
    Sup. Ct., 2 D.,
    February 11, 1895.
    
      Clark Bell, for app’lt; Betts, Hyde & Betts, for resp’t.
   Pratt, J.

The question presented by this appeal is not free from difficulty; but there are some considerations which strongly favor the plaintiff, who seems to have expended considerable monejr in bringing his article into public notice. Such discretion as the special term may exercise is not willingly interfered with, and the trial upon the merits which either party can speedily bring on, will afford a more satisfactory decision than can be had upon affidavits. Order affirmed, without costs.  