
    HARRY D. SCHADEL, RESPONDENT, v. IGNATZ HONIG, APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 28, 1926
    Decided October 18, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 56.
    For the appellant, Michael Breitkopf.
    
    For the respondent, Frank G. Turner.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, KaLISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.  