
    FROM: The District Court of the Fourth Judicial District. County of Missoula.
    STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. LYNDA LINDELL, Defendant,
    No. DC-99-13981
   Decision

On October 6, 2000, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Ten (10) year commitment to the Department of Corrections, with five (5) years suspended; Count II: Ten (10) years in the Montana Women's Prison, all suspended; Count III: Twenty (20) years in the Montana Women's Prison, all suspended; and Count IV: Six (6) months in the Missoula County Detention Facility. The sentence imposed in Count I shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed in Missoula County Cause No. DC-98-13550. The sentence imposed in Count II shall run consecutively to the sentence imposed in Count I. The sentences imposed in Counts III and IV shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed in Count I.

On April 20, 2000, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Alice Kennedy. The state was not represented.

DATED this 8th day of May, 2001.

Done in open Court this 20th day of April, 2001.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Acting Chairman, Hon. David Cybulski, Member, Hon. Katherine R. Curtis and Alt. Member, Hon. G. Todd Baugh.  