
    Martin Herrmann III v. William R. Maniatis
    
      George L. Eastman, for the appellant (plaintiff).
    No appearance for the appellee (defendant).
    Argued December 5
    decided December 5, 1972
   It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.  