
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifton Jermaine SWINTON, a/k/a Compton, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7274.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 19, 2015.
    Decided: Nov. 24, 2015.
    Clifton Jermaine Swinton, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Jermaine Swinton appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Swinton, No. 4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We deny Swinton’s motions for a transcript at government expense and to appoint counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  