
    N. & A. F. Tift & Company vs. Carlton et al.
    
    Where suit was brought in the statutory form on two drafts, upon the-face of which it appeared that the plaintiffs were the acceptors and the defendants were the drawer and payee, who was also endorser, an amendment could be made, alleging that the acceptors were mere accommodation acceptors and had paid the money for the defendants. Code, §§3479, 3480.
    Judgment reversed.
    March 4, 1884.
   Blandeord, Justice.  