
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Saul RAMIREZ-RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-10095.
    D.C. No. CR-01-01038-SMM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 9, 2003.
    
    Decided June 13, 2003.
    Before RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Saul Ramirez-Ramos appeals his guilty plea conviction and the sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ramirez-Ramos’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the appeal presents no arguable issues.

As part of his plea agreement, Ramirez-Ramos waived his right to appeal the judgment and sentence. Because he received a sentence consistent with the plea agreement, and there is no evidence that the waiver of the right to appeal was not knowing or was not voluntary, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998).

Because our independent review of the record discloses no arguable issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     