
    ELIZABETH ATCHINSON, RESPONDENT, v. COLGATE & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 29, 1925
    Decided February 1, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 451.
    For the respondent, Erwin & Erwin.
    
    For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.  