
    Krug et al. v. Roberts.
    
      Supreme Court — Dismissals—No constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 18180
    Decided December 26, 1923.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.
    
      Mr. W. S. Rhotehamel and Mr. I. L. Jacobson, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. John Dineen, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.  