
    Martin BANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 05-20182.
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Decided Oct. 7, 2005.
    Richard Kurt Arbuckle, Kurt Arbuckle, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    S Shawn Stephens, Nancy Lynne Patterson, Baker & Hostetler, Carl Knox Morrison, Houston, TX, Michael Edwin Gabel, Christopher James Yost, Federal Express Corp Legal Department, Memphis, TN, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before JONES, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

On May 8, 2002, Martin Banda (“Plaintiff’) filed his original complaint against Federal Express Corporation (“Fed Ex”) seeking recovery for “national origin discrimination.” On August 19, 2003, the district court granted partial summary judgment to Fed Ex on various of the claims asserted by Plaintiff. On March 3, 2004, the district court granted partial summary judgment to Fed Ex on additional grounds asserted by Plaintiff. On February 3, 2005, the district court granted Fed Ex’s third motion for summary judgment on the basis of judicial estoppel. That order disposed of all claims of Plaintiff. Plaintiff appealed from the final judgment entered on February 3, 2005.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum and Order entered February 3, 2005, we affirm the final judgment entered contemporaneously therewith, dismissing all of Plaintiffs claims with prejudice.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     