
    Dupree v. Dupree.
    This being a suit for divorce brought by the husband and a cross-petition by the wife, and one of the questions involved being the proper custody of the minor child of the parties, the exclusion of evidence tending to show the bad character of the father of the wife, to whose home she had gone and at which she was staying, was not injurious to the petitioner, the husband, upon the issue as to the custody of the child, inasmuch as the court awarded the custody to the plaintiff.
    All the evidence considered, it does not appear that there was an abuse of discretion upon the part of'the court in allowing temporary alimony and attorney’s fees. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
    
    No. 3955.
    March 12, 1924.
    Alimony, etc. Before Judge Wrigbt. Floyd superior court. August 6, 1923.
    
      
      M. B. Súbanlos, for plaintiff.
    
      Porter & Mebane, for defendant.
     