
    Whigham v. Davis et al.
    
    The evidence adduced at the hearing not being briefed, and no attempt having been made to brief it, this court declines to scrutinize it minutely," immaterial matter being blended with the material. The plaintiff in error has not made it legally apparent that there was any abuse of discretion in denying the injunction and mandamus prayed for, more especially as the double remedy of injunction and mandamus is not appropriate for one and the same case. Dibble v. Pease, 59 Ga. 618.
    July 17, 1893.
    Petition for injunction and mandamus. Before Judge Hansell. Decatur county. March 10, 1893.
    A. L. Townsend, O. G. Gurley and Russell & Russell, by Harrison & Peeples, for plaintiff. Donalson & Hawes and G. F. "Westmoreland, for defendants.
   Judgment affirmed.  