
    United States v. Thomas D. Thomas.
    Perjuryjnay be committed in an affidavit to an account, for this ptirpose of getting it passed by the ■ Orphans’ Court.
    Indictment for perjury in making affidavit to an account of Barton against Bryan’s estate, for $157 for five years’ board of a child, for the purpose of getting it passed by the Orphans’ Court.
    The question submitted by Mr. Key, for the defendant, and Mr. Swann for the United States, was, whether the affidavit made by the defendant, on the 27th of December, 1827, before Kobert Clarke, a justice of the peace, was perjury, if false.
    
      Mr. Key
    
    contended that it was not in a judicial proceeding. The defendant had sworn, in that affidavit, that he knew the account to be just and true ; and that the creditor (Barton) had boarded a child for Bryan for five years; and that Bryan had agreed to pay him $30 a year for the board of the child.
   But the Court, upon consideration of the Testamentary Act of Maryland (1798, c. 101, cl. 9, § 8,) and the Act of 1785, c. 46, was of opinion, (nem. con.) that the affidavit was taken in a judicial proceeding, and if knowingly false, it might be perjury.  