
    Head v. Britt.
    Argued November 31,
    Decided December 9, 1899.
    Complaint. Before J. H. Thomas, judge pro hac vice. City-court of Baxley. June term, 1899.
    
      Parker & Highsmith and E. P. Padgett, for plaintiff in error.
   Cobb, J.

There being no complaint that any error of law was committed, and the evidence being sufficient to warrant the verdict rendered, the judgment of the trial judge refusing to grant the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All thé Justices concurring.  