
    ODEN A. SCHAEFFER et ux, v. GERDA V. YOUNG (formerly Gerda V. Schaeffer) and ALFRED YOUNG, her husband
    30 (2nd) 100
    January Term, 1947
    April 22, 1947
    Division B
    
      Hunt & Salley, for appellants.
    
      O. C. Parker, Jr., and Daniel P. Galen, for appellees.
   BUFORD, J.:

This is the third appearance of the issues involved in this case here. See Young et al v. Schaeffer, 155 Fla. 887, 22 So. (2) 252; Schaeffer et al v. Young et al, 157 Fla. 611, 26 So. (2) 725. The principles of law presented and determined in our disposition of those cases are identical with those presented on this appeal.

In fact, the burden of the insistence made by the appellant is that we reconsider our action in those cases and now overrule what was held in those cases and thereupon to reverse the decree which is the basis of this decree.

We find no error in the decree and, therefore, the same is affirmed on authority of our opinions and judgments in the cases above referred to.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.  