
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noel Figurado GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-50241.
    D.C. No. CR-01-01085-AHM-1.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 17, 2003.
    Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Noel Figurado Guzman appeals his guilty plea conviction and 10-month sentence for possession of stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Guzman has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Guzman has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     