
    Pollitz et al. v. The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
    
      Supreme court — Moot questions not determined.
    
    (No. 14928
    Decided February 1, 1916.)
    Error to the Public Utilities Commission.
    
      Messrs. Henry, Fauver, McGraw & Thomsen, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. Freeman T. Eagle son and Mr, S, H. West, for defendant in error.
   It appearing to the court that the order of the public utilities commission complained of has been fully complied with and carried out, that none of the steps provided by law for the keeping of said order in abeyance pending further proceedings were taken or complied with, and that there is nothing left upon which the judgment of this court might operate, the question presented is therefore a moot one and this cause is dismissed on the authority of Miner v. Witt, City Clerk, 82 Ohio St., 237.

Cause dismissed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Newman, J., not participating.  