
    Willard E. Stewart et al., appellants, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellee.
    Filed February 9, 1899.
    No. 8714.
    Stare Decisis. This case is ruled by Moseley v. OMcago, B. & Q. B. Go,, 57 Neb. 636, the questions for decision in both cases being substantially identical. - . ;
    Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Holmes, J.
    
      Reversed.
    
    
      Webster, Rose & Fisherdich and Willard F. Stewart, for appellants.
    
      J. W. Deweese, F. E. Bishop, and John H. Ames, contra.
    
   Sullivan, J.

The questions involved in this case are, in all substantial respects, like those in the case of Moseley v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 57 Neb. 636. The judgment in this case will therefore be tiie same as in the Moseley Case.

Reversed and remanded.  