
    RODGERS v. STATE.
    (No. 4691.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 14, 1917.)
    Criminal Law <&wkey;1090(l) — Absence of Bill of Exceptions — Extent of Review.
    The complaint and information being regular. and the jury instructed by charge not complained of hy bill of exceptions in record, though one provision was questioned on motion for new trial, there is nothing presented for review in the absence of a statement of facts or bills of exceptions.
    Appeal from Jefferson County Court; D. P. Wheat, Judge.
    A. B. Rodgers was convicted of keeping a bawdyhouse, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, J.

This appeal is from a conviction for keeping a bawdyhouse; the punishment being assessed at a fine of $200, and 20 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The complaint and information appear regular. The case was tried before a jury, which was instructed by the court in a charge not complained of by any bill of exceptions found in the record, though in the motion for a new trial there is complaint of one of its provisions. There is no statement of facts or bills of exception. In this state of the record there is nothing presented which this court can review.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed. 
      <te»For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
     