
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Javier BERNAL-ACOSTA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-30201.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 15, 2006.
    
    Decided May 19, 2006.
    James M. Lord, Esq., John Joseph Lulejian, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Catherine L. Floit, Esq., Shoreline, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Javier Bernal-Acosta appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for distribution of cocaine in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Bernal-Acosta has filed a brief stating that she finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     