
    Victor K. HOLSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.J. CLARKE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 02-7249.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 7, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 10, 2003.
    Victor K. Holston, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Victor K. Holston seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Holston has not satisfied this standard. See Holston v. Clarke, No. CA-01-223-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2002). Accordingly, we deny Holston’s motion requesting a court order, deny his motion to stay proceedings, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.  