
    Macubbin v. Lovell.
    Comparison of handwriting is not evidence.
    
      Mr. Peacock, for the plaintiff
    having proved that on a note filed in another case the plaintiff had confessed judgment, prayed the Court to suffer the jury to compare a receipt purporting to be. signed by the plaintiff with the said note and from thence to infer that the signature was in his handwriting.
    "Refused.
    Kilty, C. J., absent.
   See Peake’s L. E. 68, 69,TO.

S. P. Watterstone v. Cook, at the same term.  