
    CONCRETE BLOCK & PRODUCTS CO. v. KURTZ
    Evidence — Recorded Telephone Conversations — Edited Tapes— Essential Evidence.
    Refusal to admit into evidence in a trial for conversion tapes containing recorded telephone conversations between defendant’s wife and the family attorney regarding their alleged conspiracy against the defendant was not error where four of the six tapes had been edited, and the admission of fewer than all tapes would have resulted in obvious prejudice, the defendant failed to show in what respect the alleged conspiracy altered the amount of corporate funds which he had converted and misappropriated, all of plaintiff corporation’s claims against defendant were substantiated by voluminous business records, and the record does not support a claim that the attorney-client privilege was ever waived.
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    29 Am Jur 2d, Evidence § 436.
    Appeal from Wayne, Benjamin D. Burdick, J.
    Submitted Division 1 December 16, 1970, at Detroit.
    (Docket No. 6426.)
    Decided May 24, 1971.
    Leave to appeal denied, 386 Mich 755.
    Complaint by Concrete Block & Products Co. against Walter A. Kurtz for conversion and misappropriation of corporate funds. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Kasoff, Young, Gottesman & Kovinshy (Charles Rubinoff, of counsel), for plaintiff.
    
      Nelson é Wilson, for defendant.
    
      Before: J. H. Gillis, P. J., and O’Hara and Jeannette, JJ.
    
      
       Former Supreme Court Justice, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Const 1963, art 6, § 23 as amended in 1968.
    
    
      
       Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
    
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal as of right from a judgment against defendant, Walter Kurtz, in the amount of $81,116.37 for conversion and misappropriation of the corporate funds of plaintiff Concrete Block & Products Company.

As required by GCR 1963, 517, the trial court sitting without a jury made specific findings of fact regarding the amount of the judgment. Findings of fact by a trial judge in a nonjury action will not he reversed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous. GCR 1963, 517; McDaniels v. Schroeder (1968), 9 Mich App 444; King v. Partridge (1968), 9 Mich App 540; Lidke v. Jackson Vibrators, Inc. (1967), 379 Mich 294. The record supports the court’s rulings and this Court will not reverse them.

The defense theory at trial was that there had been a conspiracy between defendant’s wife and the family attorney, which he wished to prove by recorded telephone conversations. The trial court would not allow the tapes into evidence as four of the sis tapes had been edited. The admission of fewer than all the tapes would have resulted in obvious prejudice. Defendant assigns this as reversible error. He does not show in what respect this alleged conspiracy could alter the amount of the debt owed to Concrete Block. The admission of the tapes was not an essential element of proof since all claims of plaintiff were substantiated by voluminous business records. The attorney’s claim of the attorney-client privilege was also properly upheld by the trial court as the record does not support defendant’s claim that the privilege was ever waived.

As there are no convincing circumstances disclosing that crucial proof has been overlooked or ignored and the findings of fact are supported by the record, this case is affirmed. Northwest Auto Company v. Mulligan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (1957), 348 Mich 279; Schneider v. Pomerville (1957), 348 Mich 49; Barnes v. Beck (1957), 348 Mich 286.

Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.  