
    Kathryn Hewlett, Respondent, v. National Surety Corporation, Appellant.
   — The trial court held that there is no substantial proof in the case which would justify a holding that the chattel mortgage was actually fraudulent, and also held the inference warranted that the chattel mortgage was in place of a chattel mortgage for the same amount, previously given by the husband to one Benjamin S. Tupper, “ which was paid or acquired.” Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.  