
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. German Garcia GARCIA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-30416.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2006.
    
    Filed April 10, 2006.
    Jane M. Kirk, Esq., USSP-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Dan B. Johnson, Esq., Dan B. Johnson, P.S., Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

German Garcia Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and 155-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2, and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Garcia Garcia has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Garcia Garcia has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     