
    TOOLE against GILLESPIE.
    OH OERTIORABI.
    The principal objection in this case, was the insufficiency of the state of demand. The others were contradicted by the record.
   Pennington, J. — None

of the objections in this case are supported by the record. As to the state of demand, the plaintiff below, a laborer, charges the defendant, his employer, with 6 months and 8 days’ servitude, viz., from the 29th November to the 6th June, at $20 per month, amounting to $125.33; and then credits him in the following words: Received in cash and goods, $61.73, and strikes the balance, making his demand $63.60. This, in my opinion, is sufficient. The other objections are wholly without foundation, from anything that appears on the record. I am, therefore, for affirming the judgment.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

It is really to be wished, that gentlemen would consider how far they are justifiable, in order to obtain these writs of certiorari, in offering reasons which have no foundation in truth and in fact.

Judgment by all the court, affirmed.  