
    
      Orr v. McBryde, Sheriff.
    
    The plaintiff sued out an attachment against N. T. Orr, which was levied in the hands of McBryde, who, upon his garnishment, stated that he levied an execution upon N. T. Orr’s property at the suit of the plaintiff, and raised from it the sum of $374: 7½ above the amount required in the suit.
    This sum was condemned in the Superior Court as liable to the plaintiff’s attachment, and from that judgment M’Bryde, the garnishee, appealed to this Court.
    The case was submitted without argument.
   Taylor, C. J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question presented on this record is,—whether the money in the hands of the sheriff, forming an excess beyond the amount of the execution, is liable to the plaintiff’s attachment? We are of opinion that it is liable to be attached, because it was held by the sheriff, not in his official capacity, but in his private character. He was directed by the writ of execution to raise the amount expressed in it, together with the costs, out of N. T. Orr’s property, and to return that sum to court for the benefit of the plaintiff in the suit. It has been ruled, that money in a sheriff’s hands, raised by him in obedience to a writ, is not attachable; because it would interfere with the rights of others, embarrass, and sometimes render ineffectual, the process of the Court, and produce endless litigation. But a surplus remaining in the sheriff’s hands, is the property of the defendant in the suit, who might immediately have demanded and enforced the payment of it; consequently, any of his creditors, in other respects entitled to the benefit of the attachment law, may levy upon it in the hands of the sheriff. The sum in contest is therefore condemned in the hands of McBryde, to satisfy the plaintiff’s judgment.  