
    No. 49652.
    Protests 21338-K, etc., of V. W. Davis (Duluth).
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question consists of wild rice similar to that the subject of Davis v. United States (10 Cust. Ct. 189, C. D. 751) it was held properly dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.  