
    JOHNSON et al. v. RICHARDSON et al.
    No. 16650.
    Opinion Filed April 5, 1927.
    Rehearing Denied June 21, 1927.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Questions of Fact — C011-clusiveness of Findings in Law Actiom.
    -■.Where questions of fact are submitted to the .trial court in law actions, and there is any evidence reasonably tending to support its find-ngs and judgment thereon, the same will'not be'disturbed on appeal.
    ;>Error. from. District Court, Pontotoc County; Arden L. Bullock, Special Judge.
    '■Action by Julia Johnson et al. against Stephens Richardson et al. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
    Affirmed.
    ■ E. N. Jones, for plaintiffs in error.
    Busby & Harrell, for defendants in error.
   PHELPS, J.

By stipulation this cause wáé consolidated with cause No. 16648, Julia Johnson et al. v. American Trust Co. et al. (this day decided), 125 Okla. 172, 256 Pac. 925, and in this case it is conceded that plaintiff's right to recover is dependent entirely upon Julia Johnson’s being declared the lawful wife of Mose Pettigrew at the time of his death and Foster Pettigrew and Hinabe Pettigrew being the legitimate offspring of Julia Johnson and Mose Pettigrew, and, in view of the fact that this court has by opinion in said case No. 10648. this day filed, affirmed the judgment of the district court of Pontotoc county holding that Mose Pettigrew and Julia Johnson were not husband and wife at the date of the death o£ Mose Pettigrew and that Foster Pettigrew and Hinabe Pettigrew were not the legitimate children of Mose Pettigrew and .Julia Johnson, but were the illegitimate children of Julia, it necessarily follows that the judgment of the.district court of Pontotoc coum, ty, in this cause must be, and, is hereby, in. all things affirmed.

BRANSON, C. J., MASON, Y. O. J., an.d LESTER, CLARK, RILEY, and HEFNER, JJ., concur.

Note. — See 4 C. J. p. 879, §2853; 2 R C. L. Supp. p. 194; 1 R. C. L. Supp. p. 433; 4 R. C. L. Supp. 90; 5. R. C. L. Supp: 79; 6 R. C. L. Supp. 73.  