
    Patricia Kane v. James D. Parry
    
      Patricia Kane, pro se, in support of the petition.
    
      Sperry A. DeCew, in opposition.
    Decided September 17, 1992
   The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 923, is granted, limited to the following question:

“Where the husband’s purported IRS debt of $25,000 was divided equitably at trial, but subsequently revealed to be $191,030.43, is it error for the court to refuse to open the judgment after (a) finding mutual mistake and (b) leaving the wife with substantial debts and the husband with substantial assets?”  