
    No. 46888.
    Protests 804469-G (A), etc., of Fish Schurman Corp. (New York).
   Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the microscopic cover glass in question is similar to that the subject of United States v. Clay Adams (T. D. 48625) it was held dutiable at the appropriate rate according to area under the provisions of paragraph 219 as claimed.  