
    John H. Thomas and Charles Cameron v. George Gartner and George S. Hosmer, Circuit Judges of Wayne County.
    
      Creditor's bill — Appointment of receiver — Mandamus.
    1. Mandamus is not the proper remedy by which to review an appealable order in a chancery suit.
    2. Irregularity in the appointment of a receiver under a judgment creditor’s bill is no ground for defendant’s objecting to an examination concerning his property and effects; citing Howard v. Palmer, Walk. Ch. 391.
    
      Mandamus.
    
    Order to show cause denied January 18, 1893.
    Relators, the defendants in a judgment creditor’s bill, applied for mandamus to'compel the respondents to vacate orders appointing a receiver, and requiring them to appear before a circuit court commissioner for examination. For a full statement .of facts, see Dutton v. Thomas, 97 Mich. 93.
    
      John Galloway, for relators.
   Per Curiam.

An order to show cause is denied. Mandamus is not a proper remedy to review an appealable order in a chancery case; nor is their regularity of the appointment of a receiver under a judgment creditor’s bill any reason for the defendants objecting to an examination concerning their property and effects. Howard v. Palmer, Walk. Ch. 391.  