
    WRIGHT et al. v. STATE.
    No. 3711.
    Opinion Filed May 12, 1914.
    (140 Pac. 1147.)
    APPEAL AND EEEOE — Want of Briefs — Affirmance. On account of the failure of the plaintiffs in error to serve and file briefs, as prescribed by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. .vi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment rendered against them in the - trial court should be affirmed.
    (Syllabus by Galbraith, C.)
    
      Brror from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Geo. C. Abernathy, Judge.
    
    Action by the State against Thomas H. Wright and others, judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
    Affirmed.
    S'. P. Freeling, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      C. P. Holt, Co. Atty., for the State.
   Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the state of Oklahoma in the sum of $1,500, and against the plaintiffs in error, as principal and sureties on a forfeited bail bond. The petition in error with case-made was filed in this court March 20, 1912, and the cause was regularly set down for submission and submitted on the 16th day of April, 1914. The plaintiffs in error have not served oi filed briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix).

On account of such default and failure, as prescribed in said rule, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.  