
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Grant, Appellant.
   Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Hernandez, 71 NY2d 233, 245; People v Vailes, 150 AD2d 406). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.  