
    B. & B. Trucking, Inc., Respondent, v. Home Fire and Marine Insurance Company of California, Appellant.
    (Argued May 27, 1926;
    decided July 9, 1926.)
    
      Insurance — notice — action to recover upon policy of fire insurance — insufficiency of notice of cancellation.
    
    
      B. & B. Trucking, Inc., v. Home F. & M. Ins. Co., 216 App. Div. 710, affirmed.
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 23, 1926, unanimously affirming a judgment entered upon an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of defendant and directing a verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance. The defense was that the policy had been canceled before the loss occurred. The trial court held that the notice of cancellation was insufficient.
    Judgment affirmed, with costs;
    
      Harold B. 'Medina and Leo Levy for appellant.
    
      Chauncey E. Treadwell for respondent.
   no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.  