
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William N. VINNIE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-30545.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2008.
    
    Filed March 28, 2008.
    Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Kelly L. Harris, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Terrence Kellogg, Esq., Law Office of Terrence Kellogg Pacific Building, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

William N. Vinnie, Jr., appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 98-month sentence for distribution of cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vinnie’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. .We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     