
    BOLTON v. STATE.
    (No. 6086.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 26, 1921.)
    Criminal law &wkey;l 144(14) — Presumption in favor of ruling in failing to charge prevails in absence of record showing to contrary.
    In the absence of matters in the record to the contrary, the presumption in favor of the correctness of the court’s ruling in failing to charge on the law of accomplice testimony and circumstantial evidence prevails.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robert B. Seay, Judge.
    Ray Bolton was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Judgment affirmed.
    Alvin M. Owsley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, J.

Conviction is for burglary. There is no statement of facts.

Bill of exceptions complaining of the failure of the court to charge on the law of accomplice testimony and circumstantial evidence are in the record, but are accompanied by no facts enabling the court to determine whether they are applicable or not. In the absence of matters in the record to the contrary, the presumption in favor of the correctness of the court’s ruling prevails.

The judgment is affirmed.  