
    WADE MEADOWS et al. v. T. C. MANN.
    (Filed 8 November, 1922.)
    Appeal and Error — Verdict—Proposition of Daw.
    The verdict, upon conflicting evidence, determines the issue of fact, and will not be disturbed when it appears that there is no error in the application of the principles of law involved in the controversy.
    Appeax by defendant from Daniels, J., at May Term, 1922, of CRAVEN.
    Civil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract in the sale of seed oats.
    Upon denial of liability and issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appealed, assigning errors.
    
      Guión & Guión for plaintiffs.
    
    
      Mann & Marm for defendant.
    
   PeR Cueiam.

Tbe controversy, on trial, narrowed itself principally to tbe questions of fact, wbicb bave been settled by tbe verdict. After a careful investigation of tbe record, we bave found no ruling or action on tbe part of tbe learned judge wbicb would seem to justify a reversal or an order for a new trial. Tbe judgment will be upheld.

No error.  