
    2151
    Singletary v. The State.
    Accusation of fornication; from city court of Americas — Judge Crisp. August 3, 1909.
    Submitted October 6, 1909.
    Decided May 12, 1910.
    
      'Howell B. Simmons, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. R. Williams, solicitor-general, contra.
   Russell, J.

No error- of law is complained of. While mere proof of a single act of fornication, or of even more than one such act, is insufficient to sustain a conviction of living in a state of fornication, the additional evidence in this ease, considered in connection with the proof of sexual intercourse, fully authorized the conviction of the defendant. Judgment affirmed.  