
    Clarence True, Respondent, v. Richard C. Sibley, Appellant.
    Abeéál from a, judgment rendered on a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying defendantis motion for a new trial.’'
    
      Yandevgpoel, Gumming c& Good/uivn,- (Delos MeGurdy, of counsel), for appellant.
    
      August Deymert, for -respondent.
   Gildersleeve, J.

The -questions of fact raised by' the pleadings and by the conflict of evidence in -this action were. properly submitted to the jury by the learned trial court, in a charge to which no’exception was taken.. The jury,, by their verdict, found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum -of $800. With their conclusion the General Term- will not. interfere;, as, iü our opinion, it. is. amply justified by the evidence before -us; There are no questions of law presented on this appeal which require discussion. • ■ '

The judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, .with costs;.

Freedman, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.  