
    Olivia MATIAS AVEJA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-77305.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 25, 2009.
    Olivia Matías Aveja, Fortuna, CA, pro se.
    Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Esquire, Jessica Eden Sherman, Esquire, Trial, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Olivia Matías Aveja, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that the evidence Matías Aveja presented with her motion to reopen would not alter the agency’s prior discretionary determination that she failed to establish the requisite hardship for cancellation of removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006) (8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars this court from reviewing the BIA’s discretionary denial of a motion to reopen where the evidence submitted is cumulative and concerns hardship previously considered by the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     