
    Ubaldo Traverso et al., trustees, &c., respondents, v. Helen Isabel McMillin, appellant.
    [Decided May 16th, 1927.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Bq. 514.
    
    
      Mr. John L. Griggs, Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey & Hart-pence and Messrs. Lindabury, Depue & Faullcs, for the respondents.
    
      Messrs. Pitney Hardin & Slcinner, for the appellant.
   Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — The Chile-Justice, Tkehchaed, Paekee, Kalisoh, Black, Katzehbach, Campbell, Vah Buskiek, McGlehwoh, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.  