
    C. E. Crissman, Plaintiff in Error, vs. John Corbett, Defendant in Error.
    
    135 So. 856.
    Special Division A.
    Decision filed July 11, 1931.
    
      Hendricks & Hendricks, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Chappell & Allen, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted .to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its. judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the' Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Wi-iitfield and Terrell, J.J.,.concur.  