
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Uriel SERNA-SERNA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10136.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
    
    Filed Jan. 18, 2008.
    Robert H. Bork, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Raquel Lazo, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Uriel Serna-Serna appeals from the 50-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Serna-Serna contends that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence based on a prior conviction not alleged in the indictment, admitted by him at his change of plea hearing, or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We reject this contention as foreclosed. See United States v. Covian-Sandoval, 462 F.3d 1090, 1096-97 (9th Cir.2006).

Serna-Serna further contends that even if Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), has not been overruled, this Court should construe 8 U.S.C. § 1326 pursuant to the doctrine of avoidance of constitutional doubt such that a two-year statutory maximum sentence applies to his offense. This contention is also foreclosed. See United States v. Salazar-Lopez, 506 F.3d 748, 751 n. 3 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     