
    James Michael MCGILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. George E. SNYDER; David Farmer; W. Branch; R. Cherry; B. Hedspeth; T. Howell; K. Dubose; S. Dorsey; G. Sexton; J. Aguilar; D. Goodman; D.D. Douglas; M. Young; S.D. Stevenson; C. Ward, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-7457.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 18, 2007.
    Decided: Jan. 23, 2007.
    
      James Michael McGill, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

James Michael McGill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGill v. Snyder, No. 5:05-ct-00249-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  