
    RITTER v. STOCK et al.
    
    Where the evidence produced on trial in the Court below, is conflicting, and the question is one of fact, this Court will not disturb the verdict of the jury, on the ground that the case is an equity proceeding.
    A jury who have heard the evidence and observed the manner of the witnesses produced before them, have a better opportunity of forming a correct judgment, than an Appellate Court from merely reading the statement of the evidence.
    Appeal from the Twelfth District, County of San Francisco.
    
      Shafter, Heydenfeldt £ Park and J. B. Hart for Appellant.
    
      H. S. Love for Respondents.
   Terry, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.

The questions presented by the record, are purely questions of fact.

The case was submitted to the jury on special issues, which were found in favor of defendant.

The evidence on the questions submitted was conflicting, and the verdict depended upon the weight which the jury attached to the testimony of each witness. Upon this point, the jury, having heard the testimony and observed the manner of the various witnesses produced before them, had better opportunities of forming a correct judgment than the Appellate Court from merely reading the statement of the evidence ; and we are not disposed—although this is an equity case, and the verdict of the jury is not binding on the Court—to interfere with the verdict and ruling of the Judge who tried the cause.

Judgment affirmed.  