
    Auld v. Hepburn & Dundas.
    An admission of facts by a demurrer in one suit, is not evidence of those facts in another suit between the same parties.
    The record of the suit of Hepburn Sf Dundas v. Auld was offered in evidence by the plaintiff to show that by demurring to Auld’s plea, in that case, the defendants have admitted the fact, that the releasewas required.
    
      Mr. E. J. Lee, for the plaintiff,
    cited Lee v. Boothby, 1 Keb. 720; 12 Yiner, 82. Admissions upon record in other cases between the same parties, may be given in evidence.
    
      Mr. Swann, contra,
    cited Grills v. Manned, Willes, 380.
   The Court

was of opinion (nem. con.) that the admission of facts by a demurrer cannot bind the party in any other plea, or in any other cause where the facts are put in issue.  