
    MUSGROVE v. STATE.
    No. 25661.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 23, 1952.
    No attorney on appeal for appellant.
    George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   WOODLEY, Commissioner,

Appellant was adjudged to be in contempt of court by reason of his violation of an injunction against maintaining a common nuisance, and attempts to appeal from the imposition of a fine of $100 for such contempt.

In Lawley v. State, 117 Tex.Cr.R. 14, 36 S.W.2d 1035, we said: “We are concerned with one thing only in the motion, and that is the proposition that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal. No do.ubt exists as to the correctness of the proposition. An appeal does not lie from a judgment of contempt. Crow v. State, 24 Tex. 12; Ex parte Kilgore, 3 Tex.App. [247] 249; Carter v. State, 4 Tex.App. 165; Borrer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 63 S.W. 630; Borrer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 63 S.W. 1133; Long v. State, 82 Tex.Cr.R. 403, 199 S.W. 619, 620, in which the following language is found: ‘From a judgment of contempt this court can give relief only on writ of habeas corpus when the relator is in custody.’ ”

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.  