
    Isiah JAMES, Jr.; Maurice Mack, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. C. Kelly JACKSON, Solicitor’s Office of the Third Judicial Circuit in his collective individual and/or official capacities, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-6239.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 19, 2003.
    Decided June 24, 2003.
    Isiah James, Jr., Maurice Mack, Appellants Pro Se. John Evans James, III, Lee, Erter, Wilson, James, Holler & Smith, L.L.C., Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Isiah James and Maurice Mack appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v. Jackson, No. CA-01-3981-13BD (D.S.C. Jan. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  