
    Louis Stieglitz, Respondent, v. Milo M. Belding, Jr., Appellant.
    Appeal-from a judgment-in favor of'plaintiff, and from order denying á-motion for a new trial. - ' '•' : '.
    Lexow, Mackellar & Wells, for appellant.
    Cardoza & Nathan, for respondent.
   Fitzsimons, J.

The demurrer was properly sustained, Knoor v. Bates, 12 Misc. Rep. 396; 14 id. 501; Ralli v. Hillyer, 15 id. 692.

The order and judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with costs to-the respondent.

McCarthy and Oonlan, JJ., concur,"

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.  