
    Travon THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron HOOPS, Sheriff official and individual capacity; et al., Defendants, and D. M. Bolot, Facility Administrator official and individual capacity; James Henning, Facility Chaplain official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-55594
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted September 26, 2017 
    
    October 4, 2017
    Travon Thompson, Apple Valley, CA, pro se.
    James H. Thebeau, Esquire, Deputy County Counsel, San Bernardino, CA, Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: .SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      
         The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Travon Thompson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his right to free exercise of religion during his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Thompson failed to challenge the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants, or any other district court order, and therefore Thompson waived any such challenge. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[Ajrguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     