
    In the Matter of the Department of Public Parks, etc. In re Margaret F. Redmond.
   It is apparent upon an examination of the papers that the court did not overlook any point which was presented upon the previous argument and as to those points the court adheres to its decision. The husband of the owner in attempting to act as his own lawyer does not seem to have adequately protected his own interests. The commissioners seem to have erred in the exclusion of evidence upon cross-examination of the witness upon the part of the city of purchases in the neighborhood and their award in view of the surrounding circumstances seems to be inadequate.

We think this matter should be refei red back in order that they may revise their valuation and receive the evidence which was improperly excluded.  