
    Lightfritz et al. v. The State of Ohio.
    (No. 21683
    Decided May 15, 1929.)
    
      Mr. Charles D. Fogle, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. Frederick C. Myers, prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.  