
    No. 587
    PARMELE v. DAEDELOW
    Ohio Appeals, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
    No. 4424.
    Decided May 28, 1923
    This opinion has not been published except in Abstract
    STATUTE OF FRAUDS — (1) Who must sign memorandum — (2) Need not specially plead statute.
    Attorneys — Huggett & Hanna, for Parmele; Cal-fee, Fogg & White, for Daedelow.
   VICKERY, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Action to cancel an opinion and to recover damages for breech of contract. Parmele, for $2,000, gave Daedelow a written option to purchase certain property. Parmele' alleged that Daedelow orally agreed to buy all the property. Daedelow’s separate action to recover the $2,000 paid for the option, for failure to deliver the part of the property which he agreed to buy, on Parmele’s motion, was consolidated with this action. The jury rendered a verdict for Daedlow for $2,000. The court directed a verdict against Parmele on the ground that’ Daedelow signed no memorandum. Parmele assigned this as error. In affirming the judgment the Court of Appeals held:

1. By the Statute of Frauds no action can be brought on a contract for the sale of realty unless the defendant, the party to be charged, sign a note or memorandum, even though an action may be maintained against the other party who gave a note or memorandum.

2. A general denial is sufficient to raise defense of the Statute of Frauds.  