
    Argued March 17,
    affirmed April 7, 1954
    MARTINOLE v. DELEPINE
    268 P. 2d 1040
    
      Bollm E. Bowles, of Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Weiser & Bowles, of Portland.
    
      Kermit Smith, of Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Virgil Crum and Collier, Bernard, Bernard & Edwards, of Portland.
    Before Latourette, Chief Justice, and Rossman, Lusk and Brand, Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

Action for fraud in the sale of corporate stock. Defendants are charged with conspiracy to cheat plaintiff. A jury awarded plaintiff $15,000, the amount of money he paid for the stock, and $5,000 punitive damages. There is an abundance of evidence of fraud and of a conspiracy on the part of defendants to defraud plaintiff. It therefore became a jury question.

We have carefully examined all the assignments presented to us and are of the opinion that no prejudieial error appears of record.

Affirmed.  