
    Miguel SIGLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-120.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 19, 1989.
    Scott W. Sakin, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

There is no reversible error in the trafficking and possession convictions under review. We find, however, that the evidence is insufficient to support the separate conspiracy charge, see Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and cases cited, and this conviction is therefore set aside.

Affirmed as modified.  