
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar Humberto ANGULO-FELIX, a.k.a. Cesar Angulo, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Cesar H. Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Feliz, a.k.a. Geronimo Arrielo Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-10212
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 7, 2017 
    
    Filed April 11, 2017
    Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Marc J. Victor, Marc J. Victor PC, Chandler, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Cesar Humberto Angulo-Felix appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Angulo-Felix’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel. We have provided Angulo-Felix the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Angulo-Felix waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     