
    CLARENDON WATERWORKS CO. v. CITY OF CLARENDON.
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.
    May 24, 1913.)
    Appeal and Error (§ 339) — Appeal erom Order — Temporary Injunction — Tíme.
    Where the fiat of the judge granting a temporary injunction was indorsed on a petition filed April 24, 1913, and an appeal from the order was not filed in the Court of Civil Appeals until May 10th following, it was too late under Rev. Civ. St. 1911, art. 4644, authorizing such an appeal if taken within 15 days after the granting and filing of the order granting the injunction.
    {Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 1883-1887; Dec. Dig. §
    
    Appeal from District Court, Donley County; J. N. Browning, Judge.
    Suit by the City of Clarendon against the Clarendon Waterworks Company. From an order granting a temporary injunction, defendant appeals.
    Dismissed.
    H. B. White and A. T. Cole, both of Clarendon, and D. W. Odell, of Ft. Worth, for appellant. Madden, Trulove & Kimbrough, of Amarillo, and E. A. Simpson, of Clarendon, for appellee.
    
      
      For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   I-IUFF, C. J.

The appellant appeals from an order of the Honorable J. N. Browning, Judge of the Forty-Seventh judicial district of Texas, granting a temporary injunction against appellant, the Clarendon Waterworks Company, at the suit of appellee, the city of Clarendon. The fiat of the judge is indorsed on the petition of appellee, April 24, 1913, and the same was filed on that day with the clerk of the district court of Donley, county. The appeal was filed in this court May 10, 1913. Appellant has taken this appeal under article 4644, Revised Statutes 1911.

The appellee files its motion herein in this court to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the court has not jurisdiction; the appeal having been filed in this court more than 15 days after the granting and filing of the order of the district judge granting the order for temporary injunction. The motion must be sustained, and the appeal dismissed. Baumberger v. Allen, 101 Tex. 352, 107 S. W. 526; Jaynes v. Burch, 151 S. W. 596.

.The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  