
    Palmour vs. Mitchell et al.
    
    sr. The verdict is not contrary to law or evidence in this case.
    < (a.) One who sold land on a creek for mining purposes, with full knowledge of the use to which it was to be put, and consenting that the “ tailings ” from the mine should be drained off through the -creek, and consequently through a reservoir which he had for operating a mill lower down the creek than the mine, could not complain •if such drainage was used and his reservoir was injured thereby.
    September 12, 1882.
   (Crawford, Justice.  