
    In the Interest of R.M.C. and R.M.C., Children.
    No. 11-12-00307-CV.
    Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland.
    Jan. 31, 2013.
    Monica Corrales, M. Michele Greene, Odessa, for Appellant.
    Trevor Woodruff, Managing Atty., Texas Dept, of Family & Protective Services, Austin, Cindy Weir-Nutter, County Atty., Odessa, for Appellee.
    Panel consists of: WRIGHT, C.J., McCALL, J., and WILLSON, J.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (the Department) instituted the underlying action seeking to terminate M.C.’s parental rights to her children, R.M.C. and R.M.C. At the conclusion of a bench trial, the trial court granted the requested termination of M.C.’s parental rights. M.C. appeals from this determination. We dismiss the appeal.

M.C.’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a supporting brief wherein she professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that she has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided M.C. with a copy of the motion to withdraw and brief and advised M.C. of her right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex.Crim.App.2008). In this regard, the practice recognized in Anders for court-appointed counsel to seek a withdrawal from a frivolous appeal applies to parental termination proceedings involving appointed counsel. See In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d 66, 67 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).

Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently re-viewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit and should be dismissed. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409. Court-appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Additionally, we order counsel to notify M.C. of the disposition of this appeal and the availability of discretionary review to the Texas Supreme Court. Counsel is directed to send M.C. a copy of the opinion and judgment within five days after the opinion is handed down, along with notification of her right to file a pro se petition for review under Tex.R.App. P. 53. Likewise, this court advises M.C. that she may file a petition for review pursuant to Tex.R,App. P. 53.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 
      
      . By letter, this court granted M.C. over forty-five days in which to exercise her right to file a response to counsel's motion to withdraw and brief.
     