
    H. D. Cave v. The State.
    
      No. 362.
    
    
      Decided May 9.
    
    1. Abortion — Information.—In a prosecution nnder article 538 of the Penal Code for an attempt to produce an abortion by means of a drug or medicine, it is not necessary for tbe information to allege what drug or medicine was administered. Following Watson v. The State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 237.
    2. Continuance. — It is not error to refuse a continuance where the proposed absent testimony could have no weight whatever in determining the issue involved in the case.
    Appeal from tbe County Court of Fisher. Tried below before Hon. S. PattoN, County Judge.
    Tbis appeal is from a conviction upon an information charging appellant with an attempt to produce an abortion on one Livie Brown, a pregnant woman, by then and there administering to her, with her consent, certain drugs and medicines well calculated to produce an abortion upon her, etc. Tbe punishment assessed was a fine of $110. Tbis is a companion case to that of Willingham v. The State, ante, p. 98.
    Livie Brown testified: “My name is Livie Brown. I reside in Fisher County, Texas, about twelve miles west of Boby, tbe county site. In August of 1892 I was pregnant, and Barton Willingham, a young man who lives in my neighborhood, came to my house one day and I went with him out to a straw-stack near by, and he went round and brought the defendant around to where I was. I was standing on the side next to the house. We three had a talk about my pregnant condition, and about what kind of medicine would make me miscarry it. Willingham had been giving me calomel, but it did not make me miscarry, so defendant said he could give me medicine that would make me miscarry the child, but that if I took it I must do so on my own responsibility, and that he would advise me not to do it. I told him all right, that I wanted to get shut of the child. In a few days defendant came to my house, came in the house, and brought me a powder he called calomel, and told me to take it and say nothing about it to no one. I took it; it made me sick and made my bowels to act freely. I bad taken calomel before, and tbis affected me as did tbe calomel. Tben be told me to take tbis powder, three doses a day, two bonrs apart, until I took it all. In a few days after tbis be brought me a red looking medicine and gave me a dose of it himself; tbis was a fluid medicine. He told me to take twenty drops of it at a dose, three times a day, and it would abort me. I took tbis medicine as be directed, and it caused sharp, short, quick pains in my-back and abdomen. Tbe pains would originate in my back and protrude downward to my abdomen — very much such pains as I bad when my child was born. I do not know tbe name of tbe medicine, nor did defendant know what it was, but that it would abort me. I took all of tbis medicine as defendant directed. [A bottle was here banded her.] Tbis is tbe vial, and looks just like tbe one I speak of, and will bold about one ounce. About a week and a half after defendant brought tbis medicine be returned again and brought me a dark looking powder, about a pint; also a bottle of turpentine and a bottle of whisky. [Two bottles were here banded her.] Tbis is tbe bottle that bad tbe turpentine in it, and tbis is tbe one that bad tbe whisky in it. He dosed me a dose as follows: Two teaspoonfuls of tbe dark powder, one teaspoonful of tbe turpentine, and enough whisky to dissolve it all, in a cup, banded it to me and told me to take it, and to take tbe same kind of a dose at night and morning until I miscarried. When be banded me tbe cup, in talking with him, I set it on tbe table. He tben went out of tbe bouse and I took it as be directed. I took a dose of tbis night and morning as be directed until I took all tbe powder and nearly all the turpentine. There was left in the turpentine vial about a half inch of turpentine. In about two weeks defendant returned, brought me some more of tbe black powder and some alcohol, and expressed himself as being greatly surprised that tbe medicine given bad not already aborted me. Tbis turpentine and powder affected me very greatly; gave me quick, heavy pains in tbe back and abdomen.' Tbe pains were almost as bad and very like tbe pains I bad in childbirth. I was'taking no other medicine, and took no other medicine, except what defendant gave me, during all tbis time. Tbis all occurred in Fisher County, Texas.”
    Cross-examination: “In May, before this, I told my father that I needed some medicine; that my periods were not regular. He went to Sweetwater and brought me back some brown pills. I took them; they affected my bowels a little, and tbis was tbe only effect they bad on me. My father did not know I was pregnant. Willingham gave me calomel before defendant gave me any of tbis medicine. Tbe first time I talked to defendant was out at tbe straw-stack with Willing-ham; tbis was private between us three. Tes, Mr. Cave came to our bouse one evening. I don’t know bow be came to come there. I don’t know whether father waved him by or not. It was late in the evening, and father and my sister, after sitting awhile, went out and got supper. I and my little brother remained in the house with defendant. I did not ask him this time for any money. I never asked him for any money until after my child was. born, in November, 1892; nor did I ask him then to give me any money, but wanted to borrow of him $30 for father, in February, 1893. The first time he ever gave me any money was one day he came to our house and gave me $2 and told me to buy clothing for my babe. I kept the $2, but did not feel right to keep it, so one day shortly after this I gave it back to him in the presence of my sister Orrie, and told him I did not feel like taking money that way from strangers. It was sometime after this that I borrowed the $30 from him for father. Mr. Cave often told us he had money, and seemed to want us to take it; would pat his pocket and say he had money, and offered to give us money frequently. Father was needing money badly, so one day I told him that defendant seemed to have a good deal of money, and he told me when he came again to borrow $30 for him, and tell him he would repay it as soon as possible. So I did so, and defendant let me have the money. Yes, if you will make me answer, I will tell you the whole truth. [Here witness broke down and cried.] Defendant offered us money at one other time. Defendant come to our house about a month and a half after my child was born, and lie, I, and my sister were sitting in the room together talking. Defendant took out a $5 bill, threw it my lap, and said, ‘If you girls will let me stay with you to-night, I will give you that and as much more as you want.’ I threw it in the fire and told him to leave; that I was not that kind of a girl. My father was not at home when this occurred. Yes, I did allow one man to be intimate with me. I am not a loose girl, though I did give up my virtue to one man and no other. It was Jim Copeland, to whom I was engaged to be married. I never married him. He left the country. These are the only times defendant gave or loaned us any money. Before the time I borrowed the $30 I told Mr. Cave that father was going to put this whole matter in court; that father had said that the law should take its course with men who would come and ruin his family while he was away. I thought all along defendant was offering us money as hush money, because he would beg us to keep it out of court; that it would send him to the penitentiary and ruin him and his family. Defendant often begged me not to swear against him, and if I was called to court to not tell anything; but I told him if I was called in court I would swear the truth. Defendant offered at one time to send me off to school in another State, or to get me into business somewhere where I was not known. He said he would furnish the money to send me off; would see Barton Willingham and have him to put up some of the money. He never did it, though. This was after my child was born, in February or March, 1893. I told father of this, and he said if they would do this, and I desired it, that he would not make me stay, but that he did not want me to accept the proposition. Tes, I told defendant I would go if he would send me. No, I am not swearing against defendant because he failed to put up. I told him all the time that if I was called to court I would swear the truth about this whole matter. No, it is not a fact that I, my father, and my sister at any time entered into a conspiracy to extort money from defendant by threatening him with prosecution, nor did I ever intimate such a thing to defendant; nor did I, my father, or sister, in my hearing, ever state to defendant such a thing, or promise him to not swear against him if he was prosecuted in case he would pay us money, or send me off to school, or put me in business. No such threats were ever made by us or agreed to by us. I can’t say the bottles shown me are the very bottles defendant brought me, but I believe they are. I identify the label by being torn in a peculiar shape on the turpentine bottle, and by a paper stopper being in it. I identify the small vial which had the red medicine by its shape, size, and general appearance, and it has some of the dried fluid in it, which is the same color. The whisky bottle looks just like the one I had and I think this is the one, because I never saw one like it before. I gave these bottles all to the county attorney some time ago. Some of them have paper stoppers, which I know. I did swear in the complaint which the county attorney wrote out and showed me, that this medicine was calculated to abort. I was bothered when I signed it, and I can’t say that these medicines would do it, but defendant said they would, is why I swore it. I have told all the conversations had with my father about the money and school matters, as near as I can recollect.”
    Redirect examination: “Yes, I thought these medicines would abort because of their effect on me, and because defendant said they would, and it was understood between us that thatwas what they were for when he gave them to me.”
    Recross-examination: “I don’t think that my father knew that I was taking this medicine until after my child was born. At one time I noticed that the bottles were misplaced where I kept them in my trunk, and father afterwards told me that he saw them in there, but thought nothing of it. He told me this after my child was born, and when I was telling him about taking the medicine.”
    OrrieBrowp testified: “My name is Orrie Brown. I reside in Fisher County, Texas, about twelve miles west of Roby. Was. living there in August, 1892. Am a sister of Livie Brown. Livie was pregnant in August, 1892. I know H. D. Cave. [Here she pointed defendant out.] I saw him bring her medicine twice. I saw him give her a dose of red medicine. I saw him bring the red medicine. About one week after bringing the red medicine he brought a bottle of turpén-tine, a bottle of alcohol or whisky, and a black powder; was in the room and saw defendant dose out a dose of medicine and give it to my sister, and saw her take it as Mr. Cave walked out of the room. The dose was one teaspoonfnl of turpentine, two teaspoonfuls of the black powder, and enough whisky to dissolve the powder. This dose was put in a teacup. I often saw my sister take the medicine defendant brought her. I heard him give her directions how to take the medicine. I also heard Mr. Cave tell Livie the medicine would abort her. My sister took these medicines some time in August, 1892, in Fisher County, Texas. I often heard my sister complain of severe pains in her back and abdomen while taking these medicines. She complained more of the pains while taking the medicines than before or after-wards.”
    Cross-examination: “Mr. Cave brought the medicines with the black powder first, I think, but am not sure as to that. He brought her about one pint of the black powder. She took all of the black powder and the whisky. I don’t think she took all of the turpentine. I don’t know anything about my sister getting any $30 from Mr. Cave. I did not see Mr. Cave give my sister $2 at any time, but I saw her give him $2 and tell him she did not feel right to take money from a stranger that way. Defendant often offered us money but we did not take any of it. About the last of December, 1892, defendant came to our house, and he, my sister, and myself were sitting together in the room talking, when defendant took out a $5 bill and threw it in my sister’s lap and said, ‘I will give you that and as much more as you want if you girls will let me stay with you to-night.’ My sister threw it in the fire and told defendant to leave; that she was not that kind of a girl. There was no understanding whatever between myself, my father, and sister before sister’s child was born, nor after-wards, that we would not prosecute defendant if he would send her (sister) off to school or set her up in business. I never saw Cave, the defendant, drive up to our house in a buggy and deliver to my sister any goods or medicine. I never saw him with any medicine only in the house. Defendant often came there in a buggy, but if he brought anything in it I did not see it. No, we did not propose to defendant at any time that if he would pay us money we would not prosecute him; nor was there ever any such understanding between father, sister, and myself. Mr. Cave knew that father had threatened the courts. He did it because he said he would not let people in his absence ruin his family.”
    Joe Yantis testified: “My name is Joe Yantis. I live in Fisher County. Was a member of the grand jury at the April Term of the District Court of Fisher County, 1893. I remember a statement made by H. D. Cave to the grand jury, and can give substantially all he said. I may have forgotten some of it, but don’t believe I have. Before be made bis statement be was warned by tbe county attorney that any statement made by bim could and might be used against bim, and that be was not compelled to make any'statement; that be was being investigated and could make a voluntary statement. Cave said be bad come there to tell it all, and would freely do so. He said Livie Brown, sometime in August, 1892, asked bim to get her some medicine that would produce an abortion on herself, and that be took her a bottle of calomel at one time, and at another a bottle of turpentine, a bottle of whisky, and some gunpowder, and that be dosed her out a dose of tbe medicines and gave it to her. He also told her bow to take all tbe medicines. He said be gave tbe medicines to her to produce an abortion on her.”
    Dr. Heifer testified: “My name is F. Heifer. I am a physician, having been practicing medicine since 1867. Calomel given continuously for some length of time, such as a week or two, is calculated to abort. I do not regard it as a safe medicine to give to .a pregnant woman. One teaspoonful of turpentine, with two teasponfuls of gunpowder in whisky, is calculated to produce an abortion. I would not give it. I would be afraid to give it, because it would be dangerous to tbe child and also to tbe pregnant woman.”
    No briefs with tbe record.
   HHET, PRESIDING- Judge.

This prosecution is based on article 538, Penal Code, which reads: “If tbe means used shall fail to produce an abortion, tbe .offender is nevertheless guilty of an attempt to produce abortion, provided it be shown that such means were calculated to produce that result.” Transposed, if tbe accused shall use means to produce abortion, which are calculated to have that effect, be is guilty of an attempt to produce an abortion, though tbe means used shall fail to procure an abortion. Though tbe accused may intend an abortion, and may use means for that purpose, yet, if tbe means actually used were not calculated to have that effect, be is not guilty. Tbe writer has serious doubts as to tbe sufficiency of tbe indictment. I think, under such a statute as this, tbe indictment should name tbe means, or state that they were unknown to tbe grand jury. But such an indictment as this, drawn under tbe statute, was held sufficient in tbe case of Watson v. The State, 9 Texas Criminal Appeals, 237. Did appellant administer drugs, medicines, to Miss Brown with tbe intent and for tbe purpose of procuring an abortion1? If tbe testimony of tbe prosecution and tbe deliberate confession of tbe appellant, made to tbe grand jury, are true, be evidently did. Were tbe medicines, drugs, calculated to have that effect — produce an abortion? If Heifer swore tbe truth — and bis testimony was not questioned by any person —they were.

There was no error in refusing a continuance for the testimony of Cliff Robinson. Appellant settled the fact that he administered medicines to Miss Brown for the purpose of producing an abortion, and the State could have sustained this part of her case, and yet concede the absolute depravity of Miss Brown: The other part of the case was made by the testimony of Dr. Keifer.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.  