
    Masek et al., Appellees, v. Reliance Electric Company et al., Appellants.
    [Cite as Masek v. Reliance Elec. Co. (1991), 60 Ohio St. 3d 134.]
    (No. 90-1557 —
    Submitted April 24, 1991 —
    Decided May 29, 1991.)
    
      Sindell, Rubenstein, Einbund, Pavlik, Novak & Celebrezze and Lems Einbund, for appellees.
    
      Baker & Hostetler, John H. Wilharm, Jr., Karen B. Newborn and Thomas F. Cooke II, for appellants.
    
      Spater, Gittes, Schulte & Kolman, Frederick M. Gittes and Louis A. Jambs, urging affirmance for amici curiae, 9 to 5, Natl. Assn, of Working Women, and the Ohio Employment Lawyers Assn.
    
      Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and James P. Friedt, urging reversal for amicus curiae, the Ohio Manufacturers’ Assn.
   After reviewing the facts of this case, this cause is reversed on authority of Helmick v. Cincinnati Word Processing, Inc. (1989), 45 Ohio St. 3d 131, 543 N.E. 2d 1212, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.  