
    United States v. Johnson.
    A storehouse, not ■within the curtilage, but in which the clerk of the owner usually sleeps, is, in law, the mansion-house of the owner; and burglary may be committed therein.
    This was an indictment for a burglary by breaking and entering the dwelling-house of Mr. Cassin.
    ' The building which the prisoner entered was a storehouse on a lot contiguous to the house in which Mr. Cassin lived; but not in the curtilage; his storekeeper, however, usually slept in it at night.
    
      Mr. Morsell and Mr. Van Horne, for the prisoner,
    contended that this was not a dwelling-house; but if it was, it was the dwelling-house of the storekeeper, and should have been so charged in the indictment.
   The CouRT

(CRanch, C. J., absent,)

said that this was a dwelling-house, where a person sleeps at night, and is liable to be put in fear. The storekeeper was the servant or agent of Mr. Cassin. A person may have two dwelling-houses, in either of .which burglary may be committed. 1 Hale, H. P. C. 556; Cr. Cir. Comp. 207, 480. The sleeping in a house at night fixes its character, whether or not it be a dwelling-house; for a house which .is only occupied and resided in during the day, is not considered a dwelling-house. 1 Hawk. ch. 38, f 10 to <§> 20. On the contrary, if a person takes an inn of court, or a room for the purpose of lodging, burglary may be committed therein.

Verdict not guilty.  