
    HANDMAN et al., Appellants, v. LOUIS, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    February 4, 1907.)
    Appeal from Municipa Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District Action by Simon Handman and others agair.s Joseph Louis. From a judgment of the Mu nicipal Court of the city of New York in. favo: of defendant, plarntjfih appeal. Reversed, am new trial ordered. Jacob Friedman, for appel lants. Harry M. Goldberg, for respondent.
   PER OURIAM.

A careful consideration o: the testimony given in this case leads us to th conclusion that the interests of justice will b best subserved by ordering a new trial. Judg ment reversed, and new trial ordered, witi costs to appellants to abide the event.  