
    SUPREME COURT.
    Ruth Hulbert vs. The Hope Mutual Insurance Company.
    Note.—It will be noticed that the motion made in this case at speeial term, was to set aside a summons. The decision on such a motion is not ordinarily appealable. But this involved the merits from the fact that it was a question of jwrisdictkm, calling in question the validity, as a law, of a part of the code.
    
      Erie General Term, April, 1850.
    —Mullet, Presiding Justice; Sill, Marvin and Hoyt, Justices.—Appeal from an order made at a special term, denying a motion to set aside a summons upon the ground that the court had no jurisdiction. (See report of the decision, 4 How. Pr. Rep. 275.)
   The order made at the special term was affirmed, and the opinion delivered then by Sill, J. concurred in as the opinion of the whole- court.  