
    Vincent C. DONOVAN, Appellant, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General; R. Martinez, Warden, FPC Yankton, Appellees.
    No. 05-3596.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 3, 2006.
    Filed: July 5, 2006.
    Vincent C. Donovan, Yankton, SD, pro se.
    James E. McMahon, Mark Edward Salter, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sioux Falls, SD, for Appellees.
    Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Vincent Donovan is serving a 212-month prison sentence imposed in the Eastern District of Wisconsin after a jury found him guilty of participating in a drug conspiracy and related offenses. See United States v. Donovan, 24 F.3d 908 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905, 115 S.Ct. 269, 130 L.Ed.2d 187 (1994). From his current place of confinement at the Federal Prison Camp in Yankton, South Dakota, Donovan filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in June 2005, challenging the government’s legal authority to charge him under 21 U.S.C. § 841, because “he was/is not [a member] of the ‘class’ of persons whom the statute sweeps into its criminal ambit.” The district court dismissed Donovan’s petition, finding his inability to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion did not make section 2255 inadequate or ineffective, and he appeals. Following careful review, see Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The government’s pending motion to expand the appellate record and take judicial notice of the previous 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition is granted. 
      
      . The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.
     