
    Couch vs. Williams et al.
    
    Whether the statements in this bill entitled the complainant to the injunction prayed, it is unnecessary to decide, and we do not decide that question. It is sufficient, under the settled rule of this court, to state that every material allegation in the bill was traversed, and upon the hearing of the application, there was conflicting evidence upon each of the issues thus formed. Under these circumstances, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant the injunction.
    Judgment affirmed.
    April 1, 1887.
   Hall, Justice.  