
    STATE v. EUELL BALLARD GIBBS.
    (Filed 2 March, 1966.)
    Appeal by defendant from McLean, J., July 1965 Session of Buncombe.
    Defendant was tried on a two-count bill of indictment. The first count charged that defendant forged a certain check dated April 22, 1965, for $72.00, purportedly drawn by “E. Y. Ponder” on the Citizens Bank of Marshall, North Carolina, payable to the order of defendant. The second count charged that defendant uttered said check. After trial, the jury, as to each count, returned a verdict of guilty “as charged in the bill of indictment.” As to each count, the court pronounced judgment imposing a prison sentence of not less than nine nor more than ten years, the two sentences to run concurrently. Defendant excepted and appealed.
    
      Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Rich for the State.
    
    
      B. B. Worsham for defendant appellant.
    
   Per Curiam.

The State offered evidence tending to show the name “E. Y. Ponder” is a forgery; that defendant either wrote “E. Y. Ponder” or was present, aiding and abetting, when another person did so; and that defendant took the check, endorsed it and delivered it to Sams Motor Sales, Inc., which credited $50.00 on defendant’s debt to it and gave defendant $22.00 in cash.

There was plenary evidence to require submission to the jury and to support the verdict as to each count. Moreover, careful consideration of defendant’s assignments discloses no error deemed of such prejudicial nature as to justify a new trial or to require particular discussion.

It is noted that the prison sentences imposed are within the maximum limits provided by G.S. 14-119 and by G.S. 14-120. Whether defendant should be granted relief by way of reduction of the sentences is a matter for decision by the Board of Paroles.

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.  