
    Aspenwall v. Whitemore.
    Parol evidence not admissible to prove the contents of a libelous writing.
    Action of the case for saying that the plaintiff was a thief and had stolen his timber and for writing and publishing a certain advertisement, therein charging the plaintiff with having stolen from him, and offering a reward to any person who would take up and secure the plaintiff that he might be brought to justice. Plea — Not guilty. Issue to the court.
    Parol evidence was offered to prove the contents of said libelous writing.
   By the court

The writing must be produced, parol evidence not admissible to prove the contents, unless it is lost or destroyed or is in the hands of the defendant.  