
    The HAROLD ROUCHER TRUST U/A DTD 9/21/72, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Lead Plaintiff for the Preferred Stock Purchaser Class; Preferred Stock Purchaser Plaintiffs; Joseph Pribyl, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Anthony J. NOCELLA; Russell McCann; Lewis S. Ranieri, Defendants-Appellees Franklin Lead Plaintiff Group, Movant-Appellant.
    No. 11-20291.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 14, 2012.
    James Allen Carney, Esq., Tiffany Wyatt Oldham, Esq., Carney Williams Bates Bozeman & Pulliam, P.L.L.C., Little Rock, AR, William Fred Hagans, Esq., Jennifer Beth Rustay, Esq., Hagans, Bur-dine, Montgomery & Rustay, P.C., Houston, TX, for Movant-Appellant.
    Ralph M. Stone, Esq., Stone, Bonner & Rocco, L.L.P., New York, NY, Roger B. Greenberg, Schwartz, Junell, Greenberg & Oathout, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    James George Munisteri, Gardere Wynne Sewell, L.L.P., Barrett Hodges Reasoner, Esq., Jeffrey C. Kubin, Esq., Ashley Victoria McKeand, Esq., Gibbs & Bruns, L.L.P., Houston, TX, William Brian Monahan, Esq., Andrew J. Defilippis, Brian Thomas Frawley, Robert J. Giuffra, Jr., Esq., Sullivan & Cromwell, L.L.P., New York, NY, Cynthia Saiter Connolly, Stephen E. McConnico, Esq., Jane M.N. Webre, Esq., Scott, Douglass & McConnico, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appellants challenge the district court’s judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ suit under Rule 12(b)(6) and the court’s order striking quotations from a Report of Examination issued by the FDIC. For essentially the reasons assigned by the district court in its order of May 12, 2010 and its thorough opinion and order of March 21, 2011 we affirm both the order granting the motion to strike the FDIC report and the judgment of dismissal.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     