
    Viktoria Rabkevich et al., Landlords, Respondents, v. Anna Gold et al., Tenants, Appellants. 
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    April 11, 1946.
    
      
      William Reich for appellants.
    
      Meyer Wiener for respondents.
   Memorandum: Per Curiam.

The landlords failed to establish an “ immediate, compelling necessity ” (Bent Regulation for Housing in New York City Defense-Rental Area, § 6, subd. [a], par. [6]; 10 Federal Register 11667) for the apartment presently occupied by the tenants. Such necessity imports more than desire or convenience ” and must be “ real, immediate and urgent.” (Rent Regulation for Housing with Official Interpretations, § 6, subd. [a], par. [6], Interpretation VTII, issued Jan. 10,1946.)

The final order and judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to the tenants, and petition dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

MacCrate, MgCooey and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.

Order and judgment reversed, etc.  