
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wallace Lee JOHNSON, a/k/a Boo, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wallace Lee Johnson, a/k/a Boo, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 08-6915, 08-6922.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 17, 2009.
    Decided: March 20, 2009.
    Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    
      Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Wallace Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motions for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Johnson received the full sentence reduction available under Amendment 706 to the sentencing guidelines. Johnson’s contentions that the court could have considered a sentence below the amended guideline range or that he was entitled to a full sentencing hearing under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), are foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.  