
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Osamu John HACK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-10947
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 16, 2014.
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Osamu John Hack, Pollock, LA, pro se.
    Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Os-amu John Hack has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hack has filed a response. To the extent he is raising a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record does not provide sufficiént detail to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hack’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hack’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     
      
      . See also 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
     