
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Demetrio DRABOS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-10408.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Aug. 13, 2007 .
    Filed Aug. 20, 2007.
    Frederick A. Battista, AUSA, USPX— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Neal C. Taylor, Esq., Burns, Nickerson & Taylor, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Luis Demetrio Drabos appeals from the district court’s judgment and 41-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting firearms offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Drabos’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Drabos did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief.

Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     