
    Nathanael Lenard REYNOLDS, Appellant v. Julia SWILLY, Asst. Solicitor, et al., Appellees
    No. 16-7021
    September Term, 2016
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Filed On: March 16, 2017
    Rehearing En Banc Denied June 6, 2017
    Nathanael Lenard Reynolds, Pro Se
    BEFORE: Kavanaugh and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge
   JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order, filed January 20, 2016, dismissing the complaint with prejudice on the ground of prosecutorial immunity, be affirmed. It is well established that, “in initiating a prosecution and in presenting the State’s case, the prosecutor is immune from a civil suit for damages under [42 U.S.C.] § 1983.” Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 431, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976). Appellant has not demonstrated that any of the appellees’ alleged actions or omissions fall outside the protection of prosecutorial immunity.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.  