
    Nathan JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Respondent.
    No. 63519.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 1, 1994.
    Steven K. Brown, Rosenthal, Brown & Geigerman, St. Louis, for petitioner-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenuait, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Nathan Johnson, appeals from the order of the trial court upholding the suspension of his driver’s license for refusing to submit to a chemical test for intoxication.

The order of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).  