
    Norfolk Beet Sugar Company v. State of Nebraska.
    Filed January 5, 1905.
    No. 13,996.
    Decision Followed. Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, ante, p. 57, followed.
    Error to the district conrt for Lancaster county: Lincoln Frost, Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Charles F. Manderson, James E. KeTby, Frank H. Gaines and Fdward R. Duffie, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Frank N. Prout, Attorney General, and Norris Brown, contra.
    
   Oldham, C.

This is a companion case with Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, ante, p. 57, alleging a claim for bounty under the same act. The petitions are similar, and a demurrer was sustained by the court below in each. In this court the cases were argued together; consequent, for the reasons stated in Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, supra, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Ames and Letton, CC., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.  