
    (V. D. 76)
    Keuffel & Esser Co. v. United States
    Entry No. 847585, etc.
    (Decided April 9, 1958)
    
      John D. Rode for the plaintiff.
    
      George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Lawrence, Judge:

This is a valuation proceeding which arose by virtue of judgments issued by the second division of this court in the cases of Keuffel & Esser Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 474, Abstract 60661, and id. v. id., 38 Cust. Ct. 475, Abstract 60662, wherein the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reap-praisement, pursuant to the provisions of title 28, U. S. C. § 2636 (d).

The parties to this proceeding have stipulated and agreed as follows:

1. That the merchandise consists of instruments and eases which were held by the Court in Abstracts 60661 and 60662 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of article.
2. That the market value or the price of the instruments and cases herein at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth below.
[Statistical listing of market values or prices was here set forth.]
3. That there was no higher foreign value.
4. That the instant case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the drawing and mathematical instruments and cases therefor covered by the remands of protests enumerated in the schedule, attached to and forming part of this decision, and that such value is as shown in paragraph 2 of the above-quoted stipulation.

I further find such values to be the proper dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will issue accordingly.  