
    EAGLE COVE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWN OF WOODBORO, Wisconsin, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-3194
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    Submitted November 18, 2016 
    
    Decided January 25, 2017
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied February 27, 2017
    Arthur G. Jaros, Jr., Attorney, Oak Brook, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants
    Mark Baruch Hazelbaker, Attorney, Ha-zelbaker & Associates, Madison, WI, for Defendant-Appellee Town of Woodboro, Wisconsin
    Andrew A. Jones, Attorney, Husch Blackwell LLP, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendants-Appellees Oneida County, Wisconsin, Oneida County Board of Adjustment
    Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge ANN C. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
    
      
       This successive appeal has been submitted to a quorum of the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b), Judge John D. Tinder having retired since the time of our original decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). After examining the briefs and record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus the appeal is submitted on the briefs and record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

In 2010, Appellants brought eleven causes of action against Appellees, ten federal causes of action and one state cause of action. The district court granted Appel-lees motion for summary judgment and dismissed with prejudice all ten federal causes of action. The district court then declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law cause of action and dismissed it without prejudice. We affirmed. Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Ctr., Inc. v. Town of Woodboro, Wis., 734 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2013).

Appellants filed this successive appeal challenging the district court’s denial of their motion to vacate its original judgment. We find the district court’s reasoning in that order persuasive and affirm the district court’s order on those grounds. Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Ctr. Inc. v. Town of Woodboro, No. 10-cv-118-wmc, 2016 WL 6584687 (W.D. Wis. Aug. 11, 2016).

Additionally, Appellees moved to sanction Appellants under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 for raising frivolous claims on appeal. We exercise our discretion to deny that motion.  