
    Davenport Development Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Clyde Glen Company, Defendant in Error.
    
    Opinion filed May 19, 1919.
    A Writ of Error to a Judgment of the Circuit Court within and for the County of Hillsborough; P. M. Robles, Judge.
    Affirmed.
    
      Wilson & Boswell, for Plaintiff in Error.
    
      Mabry & Garitón, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term upon the transcript of the record of the ujdgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur-  