
    Thomas S. McCall, Resp’t, v. Emma L. Jacquelin, App’lt.
    N. Y. C. C.,
    January 28,1896.
    Redfield & Redfield, for app’lt;
    Michael H. Curren, for resp’t.
   CONLAN, J.

The order for substituted service was properly made, and the requirements of the Code obs'Tved. Motion to vacate was properly denied. Order appealed from affimed, with costs. All concur.  