
    In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Daniel Francis JAMBOR, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota.
    No. C9-99-1192.
    Supreme Court of Minnesota.
    Aug. 23, 1999.
   ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Daniel Francis Jambor has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, neglecting two client matters, making misrepresentations to clients and others involved in those matters, and failing to cooperate with the Director’s investigation of complaints regarding those matters.

In mitigation, respondent states that from June through November 1998 he was involved in a bitter marital dissolution proceeding, including an emotional custody dispute regarding his child.

Respondent admits his conduct has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director wherein they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and two years of supervised probation subject to the following conditions:

(1)Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director’s Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation and promptly respond to the Director’s correspondence by the due date. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director’s investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct which may come to the Director’s attention. Upon the Director’s request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verify compliance with the terms of this probation.

(2) Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct.

(3) Respondent shall be supervised by a licensed Minnesota attorney appointed by the Director to monitor compliance with the terms of this probation. Respondent shall provide to the Director the names of four attorneys who have agreed to be nominated as respondent’s supervisor within four weeks from the date this order is filed. If, after diligent effort, respondent is unable to locate a supervisor acceptable to the Director, the Director will seek to appoint a supervisor. Until a supervisor has signed a consent to supervise, the respondent shall, on the first day of each month, provide the Director with an inventory of active client files described in paragraph (4) below. Respondent shall make active client files available to the Director upon request.

(4) Respondent shall cooperate fully with the supervisor in his/her efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall contact the supervisor and schedule a minimum of one in-person meeting per calendar quarter. Respondent shall submit to the supervisor an inventory of all active client files by the first day of each month during the probation. With respect to each active file, the inventory shall disclose the client name, type of representation, date opened, most recent activity, next anticipated action, and anticipated closing date. Respondent’s supervisor shall file written reports with the Director at least quarterly, or at such more frequent intervals as may reasonably be requested by the Director.

(5) Respondent shall initiate and maintain office procedures which ensure that there are prompt responses to correspondence, telephone calls, and other important communications from clients, courts and other persons interested in matters which respondent is handling, and which will ensure that respondent regularly reviews each and every file and completes legal matters on a timely basis.

(6) Within 30 days from the filing of this order, respondent shall provide to the Director and to the probation supervisor, if any, a written plan outlining office procedures designed to ensure that respondent is in compliance with probation requirements. Respondent shall provide progress reports as requested.

(7) Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Daniel Francis Jambor is publicly reprimanded and placed on two years of supervised probation under the conditions jointly agreed to and stated above.

BY THE COURT:

Alan C. Page

Alan C. Page Associate Justice  