
    Enkhbat ARILD, et. al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-74897.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 20, 2009.
    
    Filed Aug. 31, 2009.
    Enkhbat Arild, Belmont, CA, pro se.
    Daniel Ralph Richardson, Esquire, Richardson Intellectual Property Law, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.
    Chuluuntsetseeg Shagdar, Belmont, CA, pro se.
    Tseene Enkhbat, Belmont, CA, pro se.
    Thomas J. Gullo, Esquire, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    
      Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Petitioners Enkhbat Arild and Chulu-untsetseeg Shagdar, husband and wife, and their minor child, all natives and citizens of Mongolia, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1487 (9th Cir.1997), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA only affirmed the IJ’s credibility finding based on petitioners’ demeanor during their testimony. Petitioners do not raise any challenge to the dispositive demeanor finding in their opening brief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996). Accordingly, we deny the petition.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     