
    The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Clark, Appellee.
    [Cite as State v. Clark, 145 Ohio St.3d 210, 2015-Ohio-3580.]
    (No. 2012-0215
    Submitted August 11, 2015
    Decided September 3, 2015.)
    Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew E. Meyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
    Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, .and Jeffrey M. Gamso and Erika Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellee.
   {¶ 1} This court issued its judgment in this cause affirming the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals on October 30, 2013. State v. Clark, 137 Ohio St.3d 346, 2013-Ohio-4731, 999 N.E.2d 592.

2} On June 18, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings. Ohio v. Clark, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2173, 192 L.Ed.2d 306.

{¶ 3} On review of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, we remand this cause to the court of appeals to consider defendant-appellee Darius Clark’s assignments of error, which the court of appeals had determined to be moot. See State v. Clark, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 96207, 2011-Ohio-6623, 2011 WL 6780456, ¶ 72.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.  