
    M‘KEAN vs. TAIT.
    
      A survey of a town by commissioners appointed for that purpose by the legislature, is conclusive as to the boundaries of the lots.
    
      Trespass. Quare clausum fregit, in part of lot No. 9, in the town of Nashville, setting forth the abuttals and title.
    It was contended by the plaintiff's counsel, that it was not necessary in order to maintain trespass, that the plaintiff should shew title; bare possession is sufficient. That tenants at sufferance or will, might maintain trespass against a stranger, but a mere trespasser cannot maintain that action for an injury to the free-hold.
    
    The defendant deduced his title by regular conveyances from the commissioners of the town, for 30 feet of the lot No. 9, and as to the boundaries of the part purchased, relied upon a survey made of the town, in pursuance of the act of March, 1796, e. 29, for the purpose of quieting disputes.
    An act passed November the 10th, 1801, e. 76.
    The plaintiff attempted to prove the abuttals of lot No. 9, by a survey made by Thomas Molloy, in conformity to one originally made by himself, but failing in proving the bounds of this lot, by that survey, though the beginning of the town, and the bounds of a few other lots were proved, from which bounds of other lots, it was argued, that the bounds of this could be, and were ascertained lately.
    The defendant proved that he conformed to the bounds made under the act of assembly.
    
      
      6 Bac.566. Esp. N. P 405. Plow. 540. 6 Bac 567. Cites 3 Burr 1824.
    
   Per Curiam.

The survey under the act of 1796, ought to govern, for it evidently appears, that when that act was made, there was not a lot in town, the boundaries of which could be ascertained.

The act was made upon the petition of the inhabitants of the town, and is similar to a bill of peace in chancery. The commissioners who ascertained the bounds upon the re-survey, were nominated by the inhabitants. Their proceedings in a great degree partake of the nature of judicial acts; great injury will arise if this re-survey is disputed.

Verdict for the defendant.  