
    Hooker and Others v. Richards, Administrator.
    ERROR to the Clay Circuit Court.
    
      Thursday, June 8.
    
    
      R. Brackenridge, Jr., for the plaintiffs.
    
      D. McDonald, W. A. McKenzie, and W. Henderson, for the defendant.
   Davison, J.

This judgment is affirmed, for the reasons given in Hooker v. Folsom, 4 Ind. R. 90, the facts of the two cases being similar.

Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.  