
    
      Josiah Waddington v. Chamberlin and Clason.
    
    L AST term the court had, in this suit, granted a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue against A. B. but from some accident in the clerk’s office, in Albany, the rule had not been forwarded, so as to admit of serving a copy twenty days before the term,
    
      Higgs,
    
    on these facts, moved to renew the rule for the attachment, which was
   Ordered accordingly.  