
    Michael Mennitto, Plaintiff, Respondent, v. Dominick Iacovacci, Defendant, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 13, 1924.
    Municipal Court, city of New York — jurisdiction — no jurisdiction of action to recover amount alleged to be due from one partner to another after dissolution.
    The Municipal Court of the city of New York is without jurisdiction of an action brought to recover an amount alleged to be due from one partner to another after a dissolution of the partnership, where there has been no previous account,
    Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, first district, in favor of plaintiff.
    
      Levinson & Feinsod, (Irving Levinson, of counsel), for the appellant.
    
      John E. Leddy, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The action is brought to recover an amount alleged to be due from one partner to another after a dissolution of the partnership. There- had been no previous account. The Municipal Court is without jurisdiction of such an action. Fischer v. Stein, 161 N. Y. Supp. 342; Golden v. Friedman, 159 id. 842, 843; Schmitt v. Querengaesser, 94 Misc. Rep. 640.

Judgment reversed without costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.  