
    Geisenberger et al. v. Herman et al.
    
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    
    January 28,1889.)
    Appeal from special term, New York county.
    Argued before Van Brunt, P J., and Brady and Macomber, JJ.
    
      H. A. Root, for appellant. BVumenstiel & Rirseh, for respondents.
   Brady, J.

Por tim"reasons stated in the decision of the case of Kibbe v Herman, ante, 852, (delivered herewith,) the order appealed from should be reversed, and the motion granted, with §10 costs and disbursements. All concur.  