
    Stevens v. Dunbar, on Appeal.
    HELD, that a judgment in favour of the defendant upon a demurrer to the declaration, is no bar to a subsequent suit for the same cause. Lepping v. Kedgewin, 1 Mod. 207 .
    
      Held,, also, that in an action of debt upon a note, the interest ascertained to be due at th^ime of the judgment, ought to be entered as so much in damages; and that the judgment in such case is that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the sum of-dollars in debt, and He sum of-dollars in damages, making in all thé sum of-dollars, together with his costs and charges.
    
      
       1 Chitt. Plead. 195. — Kendal v. Talbot, 1 Marsh. Ky. Rep. 321.
    
     