
    Russell-French, Appellant, v. Russell-French.
    Argued June 16, 1971.
    
      John J. Cahill, with him Cahill, Cahill S Lynch, for appellant; Rioha/rd H. Elliott, with him James F. McMullan, Jr., and Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, for appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam :

In the appeal at No. 510, October Term, 1971, the order is affirmed. Having made an independent study of the entire record we are of the opinion that the court below properly refused a divorce a.v.m. in this case.

In the appeal at No. 749, October Term, 1971, the order allowing additional counsel fees and expenses is affirmed.

Spaulding, J., absent.  