
    Willie O. SCOTT, Sr., Petitioner, v. GRONDIN REMODELING CO., Security Mutual Insurance Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 33122.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 11, 1964.
    Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser,. Abrams & O’Malley, Miami, for petitioner.
    Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka & Carlton, Miami, for Grondin Remodeling Co. and Security Mut. Ins. Co. of New York, Paul E. Speh and Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date Qctober 17, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. '  