
    Liddell, administrator, vs. Wright, administrator.
    The question being wheth r one who held under a bond for titles or its equivalent had paid all of the purchase money thereunder, and there being sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of the jury on that issue, this court will not control the discretion of the court below in refusing a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to law, evidence and the charge of the court.
    (a.) A promissory note having been produced from among the effects of a deceased debtor by his administrator, the presumption was that it had been paid, and the onus was on the party asserting the contrary to show it.
    Judgment affirmed.
    March 18, 1884.
    Jackson, 'Chief Justice.
     