
    16813.
    Wilkes v. Tennessee Chemical Company.
    Decided December 15, 1925.
   Bloodworth, J.

The court did' not err in striking the answer of the defendant as amended, nor in thereafter awarding judgment in fay;or of the plaintiff for the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees sued for.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Complaint; from city court of Camilla—Judge Burson. September 7, 1935.

Hill & McElvey, Butch Wilkes, M. A. Warren, for plaintiff in error.

Pope & Bennet, contra.  