
    No. 211
    PALMER v. MITCHELL
    No. 20255.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Jan. 7, 1926,
    5 Abs. 27.
    647. INSURANCE — Where beneficiary under War Risk Insurance Policy dies should balance of intsallments be paid to beneficiaries, administratrix or to father and half brothers of insured?
    First Publication of #this Case
    Attorneys — C. 3. Timberlake, Bellaire, for Palmer; H. W. Mifchell and Thornburg & Lewis, St. Clairsville, ior Mitchell.
   The question involved is, do unpaid installments of insurance issued as War Risk Insurance accrue to beneficiaries, administratrix or should they be paid direct to the father and half brothers of '.nsured?

Note — Motion to certify allowed, 5 Abs. 90.  