
    McClung Drug Company, appellant, v. City Realty and Investment Company et al., respondents.
    [Decided October 21st, 1920.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baekes, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. 3. Eq. me.
    
    
      Messrs. Wight, Wight £ Golenboch, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Thomas Brotan and Mr. Leo Goldberger, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.

For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—14.

For reversal—None  