
    Samuel Joseph, Appellant, v. Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents, v. Saul Joseph, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
   — Order affirmed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. The eonsohdation of actions Nos. ] and 2 would prejudice a substantial right of respondents, to wit, a speedy trial. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’MaEey and Townley, JJ.  