
    MADISON v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 8, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1101*) — Appeal—Affirmance.
    'Where the motion for new trial complains of the charge and the refusal of special charges requested by defendant, which, in the absence of a statement of facts, cannot be considered, the conviction will be affirmed.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1101.*)
    Appeal from Dallas Comity Court at Law; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge.
    Mack Madison was convicted of an aggravated assault, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and given the lowest penalty, a fine of $25.

There is no statement of facts in the record. Complaints in the motion for new trial are made of the charge of the court and the refusal of certain special charges requested by appellant. They attempt' to raise such questions as cannot be considered by this court without a statement of facts.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.  