
    Carl O. Carlson, petitioner-appellant, v. Amy Rogers Carlson, defendant-respondent.
    [Submitted May 25th, 1945.
    Decided September 27th, 1945.]
    
      Mr. IF. Howard Demaresl, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Simon J. Griffinger (Mr. Jacob L. Neioman, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Petitioner sued for the annulment of his marriage to defendant. He charged incurable impotency, due to “physical abnormality, chronic illness and inhibitions or fears” arising “in whole or in part” from “psychophysical conditions,” and a premarital determination not to consummate the marriage, and the fraudulent concealment of all of the foregoing. Defendant counter-claimed for separate maintenance.

The master, in formal conclusions that have not been reported, found that the proofs did not sustain these allegations, and dismissed the petition; and we concur therein.

As to the counter-claim, the master concluded that petitioner had abandoned defendant without justifiable cause, and had refused and neglected to maintain and provide for her; and he awarded the counter-claimant alimony at the rate of $30 per week and a counsel fee of $1,500. Petitioner contends in this regard that there is no “proof of marital offense, or of abandonment, or of financial need,” and that the allowances are excessive.

We find that the evidence sustains the finding of abandonment and the award of alimony, but we think the counsel fee should be reduced to $500. A like allowance was made pendente lite; and we consider that a total of $1,000 is adequate compensation for all the services rendered by counsel.

For modification — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Dokgbs, Usher, Perskie, Colie, Olipi-iaxt, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freukd, McGeehax, JJ. 14.  