
    20046.
    Kight v. The State.
    Decided November 13, 1929.
    
      Dampier & Watson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. A. Merritt, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.  