
    Charles J. EATO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D14-666.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 6, 2014.
    Charles J. Eato, in proper person.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and LAGOA and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
   SHEPHERD, C.J.

Appellant, Charles Eato, has filed sixteen appeals with this court since 2005. The majority of these appeals stem from successive, untimely, and frivolous motions for post-conviction relief in the trial court. Consequently on June 23, 2014, this court issued an order to show cause why Eato should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motions, or petitions relating to his convictions, judgments, and sentences in case numbers 03-2288, 03-2288A, 03-2289, and 03-2289A. Charles Eato responds by accusing this court of intentionally disregarding the law to deny him the ability to seek justice, despite the sixteen, often frivolous, appeals he has been allowed to file on his own behalf.

“[A]ny citizen, including a citizen attacking his or her conviction, abuses the right to pro se access by filing repetitious and frivolous pleadings, thereby diminishing the ability of the courts to devote their finite resources to the consideration of legitimate claims.” State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999). After an order to show cause and the opportunity to answer, a court may sanction a party for repetitious and frivolous pleadings by preventing further filings from that party. Id.

Upon consideration of the response to the order to show cause, we find that Eato has failed to demonstrate good cause for his actions. Based on Eato’s repeated attempts to abuse the justice system with frivolous appeals, it is hereby ordered that the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal will refuse to accept any further filings relating to case numbers 03-2288, 03-2288A, 03-2289, and 03-2289A unless they have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing. Any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by Eato will subject him to sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for consideration by it of disciplinary action, including the forfeiture of gain time. See 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). 
      
      . Appeal Case Numbers: 3D05-2225, 3D06-1073, 3D06-3199, 3D08-0093, 3D08-1335, 3D08-1794, 3D09-1417, 3D09-2923, 3D09-3222, 3D 10-1192, 3D10-1474, 3D10-2512, 3D 11-0519, 3D14-0481, 3D14-0666, and 3D14-0721.
     