
    Masino v. The State of Ohio. Wood v. The State of Ohio.
    (No. 24958
    — Decided October 24, 1934.)
    
      Mr. A. J. BiancM, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. Arthur L. Sidwell, city solicitor, Mr. B. B. Watters, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. I. 8. Ballard, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.  