
    Alfred E. Kenney, trustee, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Elmer King et al., defendants-respondents.
    [Decided June 20th, 1922.]
    Appeal of John P. Eamsey, administrator, &c., defendant-appellant.
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is printed with the last preceding case.
    
      Messrs. McCarter & English, for the defendant-appellant. Eamsey.
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer, for the complainant-respondent.
    
      Messrs. King & Vogi\, for the defendants-respondents.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the finding of facts by the vice-chancellor and the propriety of the deciee based on those facts. The decree is therefore affirmed. ■

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, B,lack, Katzenraoi-i,. White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. ....

For reversal — None.  