
    In re G.T., Juvenile
    [588 A.2d 621]
    No. 89-473
    January 22, 1991.
   The judgment is affirmed on the grounds that the trial court made a case-specific finding that requiring the child victim to testify in the presence of the defendant would present a substantial risk of trauma, which would substantially impair the ability of the child to testify. V.R.E. 807; Maryland v. Craig, — U.S. —, —, 110 S. Ct. 3157, 3169 (1990).  