
    Louis Maira, Respondent, v. Esther Friedman, Appellant, and Charles W. Hartung et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
    
      Maira v. Friedman, 171 App. Div. 887, affirmed.
    (Submitted May 22, 1919;
    decided June 6, 1919.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 20, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendants-respondents, entered upon a decision of the Monroe County Court on trial without a jury in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The defendant, appellant, contended that plaintiff wrongfully abandoned and failed to complete the work he had contracted to perform.
    
      William MacFarlane for appellant.
    
      George E. Warner for plaintiff-respondent.
    
      Eugene Baines for defendants-respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs to each set of respondents appearing by separate attorney; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.  