
    Peggy Tams, individually and as executrix of the estate of Raymond E. Tams, deceased, complainant-respondent, v. Morton Abrams, Ramos & Company, Incorporated, a New Jersey corporation, and Paramount Investment Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, defendants-appellants.
    [Argued February term, 1936.
    Decided April 24th, 1936.]
    
      
      Messrs. Scholland & Schotland, for the defendant-appellant Paramount Investment Corporation.
    
      Messrs. Osborne, Cornish & Scheck and Mr. Ervin S. Fulop, for the complainant-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The pleadings and proofs in this case have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the vice-chancellor are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.  