
    Matter of the Application of Julia O’Neill, as Administratrix, to Sell the Real Estate of Jomsr O’Neill, Deceased, for the Payment of His Debts.
    
      (Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,
    
    
      January, 1906.)
    Executors and administrators—Subjection of realty to debts—Proceedings therefor—Allegations of names of persons interested.
    In a proceeding for the sale of the real estate of a deceased person . for the payment of debts and funeral expenses, an allegation in the petition, that the names and number of the heirs at law of the deceased are unknown to the petitioner and she does not know of any person claiming to be such, is insufficient to enable the court to dispense with a citation to such heirs by name and to issue a citation to them as a class. Diligent inquiry to discover them should be shown.
    Application of Julia O’jSTeill, as administratrix, to sell the real estate of decedent for the payment of his debts.
    Arthur O. Leach, for petitioner.
   Church, S.

S.By the amendment to the Code, made by -chapter 750 of the Laws of 1904, it is no longer necessary for • the surrogate upon the hearing in a proceeding of this character to determine the validity of the obligations against the deceased or the priorities of the same, but, under sections 2762 and 2756 of the Code, it is sufficient if it appears that the personal property of the deceased is inadequate to pay the debts. As it is evident from the testimony herein that the funeral bill is unpaid and that there is practically no personal property, enough has been shown to authorize a decree for the sale of decedent’s real estate and I should do so were it not for the provision of section 2756 which requires that the surrogate shall •determine if the proceedings have been in conformity with that title of the Code.

■This application is made by the widow. None of the heirs-at-law of the deceased are cited by name. A citation has been published as against unknown heirs, but the allegations of the petition, in my judgment, disclose that insufficient effort has been made to ascertain whether there are any known heirs. The allegations .therein set forth are briefly as follows: That the names and number of the heirs, if any, of decedent are unknown to your petitioner, except that the name of each such heir when last heard of by your petitioner about seventeen years ago was O’Neill; that your petitioner does not know whether there are any persons claiming under such heirs.”

It will be observed that the above averment is simply one of negation on the part of the widow of the deceased. There is no statement that the slightest effort has been made to ascertain those heirs. There is no statement as to who the heirs were whom the petitioner heard of seventeen years ago. In other words, these allegations could be made with perfect truth by the petitioner and still there be heirs of the deceased within the reach of personal service in this county. Before a person’s heirs, whether known or unkonwn, can be cut off by a proceeding of this character, the person commencing the proceeding should institute diligent inquiry to discover who and where they are and should submit the facts showing such inquiry to the court. A mere negative statement or a mere statement which amounts to a conclusion of law that there are no known heirs is, in my judgment, insufficient.

Decreed accordingly.  