
    REITZFELD v. SOBEL et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    January 8, 1909.)
    Master and Servant (§ 8)—Discharge—Indefinite Term—Damages.
    • If an employé was not hired for any definite period, she could not recover a full month’s wages upon being discharged, but only for the time she worked.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. §§ 8-10; Dec. Dig. § 8.]
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.
    Action by Tillie Reitzfeld against Mary Sobel and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appealed. Reversed, and new trial ordered.
    Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., and BISCHOFF and GUY, JJ.
    Otto F. Seggel, for appellants.
    Samuel Manheimer, for respondent.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes
    
   PER CURIAM.

The testimony given on the part of the plaintiff failed to show that she was hired for any definite period, and, as her right to recover for one month’s wages depended upon such proof, the judgment must be reversed. Frank v. Man. Mat. & Dis. (Sup.) 107 N. Y. Supp. 404.

Judgment reversed and new trial.ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.  