
    SULLIVAN, Respondent, v. BROOKS et al., Appellants.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    May 18, 1894.)
    Action by John Sullivan against William Brooks and another.
    Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and VAN WYCK, J.
    Alex. Thain, for appellants.
    Edwin G. Davis, for respondent.
   VAN WYCK, J.

The action is for damages for personal Injuries received by reason of the negligence of defendants’ servant in so a horses as to cause the wagon to run upon plaintiff, and crush his leg. The verdict was for plaintiff for $250, and is not excessive. The defendants duly excepted to the denial of their motion to nonsuit, on the grounds that the proof did not show that plaintiff was free from negligence, or that defendants had been guilty of carelessness, and did show that plaintiff’s negligence had contributed to the accident. The plaintiff, a hod carrier, says that he was shoveling sand from a pile into a coal hole in the sidewalk, when the driver turned his wagon and team, and, before plaintiff knew anything, he was run down, and did not see the team as it backed.on him, just before it struck his leg, because he was shoveling the sand on the sidewalk, with his back towards the roadway; and that the driver never hallooed or said a word or gave any warning, and, before plaintiff knew where he was, the wagon was on his leg; and that the driver could have come up another way, and no other driver came up like him, and he could have come up as any other driver did. And two other witnesses testify that, just after the accident, the defendant Brocks said: “I am sorry, myself. The driver yesterday came-pretty near running over me, and I am going to discharge him. That driver went very near killing me, but he will never drive for me again.” However, this defendant denied making such statements. The verdict is not against the evidence or the weight of evidence, and the judgment and order appealed’ from are affirmed, with costs.

*

End of Cases in Vol. 28.  