
    146 So. 807
    ASHLEY et al. v. THRASHER.
    7 Div. 158.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 16, 1933.
    Motley & Motley, of Gadsden, for appellants.
    McCord & McCord, of Gadsden, for appellee.
   BROWN, Justice.

This is a bill by a judgment creditor with a lien arising from the registration of the judgment as authorized by section 7874 et seq. of the Code of 1923.

The equity of the bill was questioned by demurrer, taking the point that the averments of the bill show that the complainant has a complete and adequate remedy at law, and one phase of the argument is, that the bill does not aver that execution has been issued and returned nulla bona.

It has been repeatedly ruled here, “that, notwithstanding the remedy by execution afforded by the statute, ‘the jurisdiction of a court of equity, without the intervention of other equitable ground, may be invoked to subject property to the lien of a recorded judgment; the statutory remedy by execution not being exclusive, but additional or cumulative only’ ” (Griffith et al. v. First Nat. Bank of Guntersville, 221 Ala. 311, 128 So. 595); and this jurisdiction has been extended to all liens where a statutory method for their enforcement exists. Code 1923, § 8935.

Another phase of the argument is, that under the provisions of section 7873 of the Code, the judgment cannot be made the basis of an action. That section relates to actions at law brought for the purpose of reviving or re-establishing the claim embodied in such judgment.

■ It is also urged that the bill is not sworn to. This point was not taken by the demurrer, and this question is not presented for decision.

The demurrers to the bill were properly overruled, and the decree will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.  