
    Marshall BURRAGE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    ED 104124
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: December 20, 2016
    Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
    Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marshall Burrage appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated.
     