
    Mark RANKIN, Employee/Appellant, v. LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 98410.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 18, 2012.
    Kenneth P. Carp, Noah J. Goldkamp, Noah J. Goldkamp, Co-Counsel, Clayton, MO, for Employee/Appellant.
    Judith L. Garner, St. Louis, MO, for Employer/Respondent.
    Bart A. Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Rankin appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).  