
    William Hollenback v. Michael Miller & Wife.
    Trover will not lie against husband and wife for a conversion to her use only.
    In trover, the declaration stated that the defendants, (husband and wife,) converted the goods “ to her own use.”
    
      Mr. J. Dunlop,
    moved in arrest of judgment, that there cannot be a conversion to the use of the wife during the coverture. 2 Saund. 47, note; Rhemes v. Humphreys, Cro. Car. 254; Perry v. Diggs, Cro. Car. 494.
   Judgment arrested (nem. con.) for that reason.  