
    Etta Roth, Respondent, v. National Automobile Mutual Casualty Company, Appellant.
    
      Appeal — judgment of Appellate Division affirming determination of Appellate Term affirming judgment of Municipal Court — appeal without permission to Court of Appeals dismissed.
    
    
      Roth v. Nat. Automobile Mutual Casualty Co., 202 App. Div. 667, .appeal dismissed.
    (Argued March 14, 1923;
    decided April 17, 1923.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial ■ department, entered July 25, 1922, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.
    
      Theodore II. Lord foi appellant.
    
      Harold R. Medina and Charles S. Rosenthal for respondent.
   Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cajrdozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.  