
    Sugarman et al. v. The State of Ohio.
    (No. 25318
    Decided May 1, 1935.)
    
      Mr. Ray T. Miller and Messrs. Silber S Soltz, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Frederick W. Frey, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.  