
    Lauren PAULSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William CARTER, President of the Oregon State Bar; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-35282.
    D.C. No. CV-04-01501-DJH.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 14, 2005.
    
    Decided June 17, 2005.
    Lauren Paulson, Aloha, OR, pro se.
    Susan K. Eggum, Esq., Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.

Applying the “limited and deferential” standard of review appropriate for preliminary injunction rulings, Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d 914, 918 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc), we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings in denying preliminary injunctive relief. See Playmakers LLC v. ESPN, Inc., 376 F.3d 894, 896-97 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining standard of review).

The order denying the motion and amended motion for preliminary injunction are therefore AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     
      
      . Appellees' unopposed motion to strike portions of appellant's Excerpts of Record and Supplemental Excerpts of Record is GRANTED.
     