
    Hutson v. Briggs. Hutson v. Briggs. Hutson v. Allen. Hutson v. Stewart.
    
      Supreme Court — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (Nos. 19410, 19438, 19439, 19440
    Decided December 22, 1925.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Fayette county.
    
      Messrs. Vorys, Setter, Seymour & Pease; Mr. John P. Phillips and Mr. John Logan, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. D. C. Badger; Mr. W. S. Cowan and Mr. Charles J. Pretsman, for defendants in error Briggs and Allen.
    
      Messrs. Hidy & Sanderson, for defendant in error Stewart.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

Petitions in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.  