
    James J. McDERMOTT, Regional Director of Region 31 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board; National Labor Relations Board, Petitioners-Appellants, v. VERITAS HEALTH SERVICES, INC., dba Chino Valley Medical Center, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 11-56125.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 2012.
    Filed Feb. 24, 2012.
    Kayce R. Compton, Judith llene Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Laura T. Vazquez, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioners-Appellants.
    Brady J. Mitchell, Lindsey M. Stevens, Esquire, Littler & Mendelson, PC, Los Angeles, CA, Theodore Richard Scott, Esquire, Littler Mendelson, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

We review the denial of a temporary injunction for an abuse of discretion. “An abuse of discretion will be found if the district court based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous finding of fact.” Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir.2011) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Regional Director has failed to show the district court abused its discretion. The district court’s factual findings are not clearly erroneous and are supported by the record. Moreover, the district court identified the correct legal standards, and applied them in a reasonable manner. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Hinkson, 585 F.3d 1247, 1262 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the temporary injunction.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     