
    State ex rel. Wood v. Smedley.
    (Opinion filed May 6, 1896.)
    Original information in the nature of quo luarrcmto to test defendant’s right to the office of state regent of education, and for an injunction to restrain him from exercising the duties of that office.
    Denied.
    
      John Wood, State’s Attorney, O. S. Palmer [and Mathews & Murphy, for plaintiff.
    
      Gheever & Hall, for defendant.
   Corson, P. J.

The facts in this case are substantially the same- as in the case of State v. Sheldon, 8 S. D. 525, 67 N. W. 613, except that the defendant herein was appointed as his own successor. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the application for an injunction is denied; all the judges concurring.  