
    (121 So. 441)
    WOOD v. HACKER.
    (6 Div. 289.)
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 28, 1929.
    Matt H. Murphy and W. Marvin Woodall, both of Birmingham, for petitioner.
    David J. Davis, of Birmingham, opposed.
   SAYRE, J.

Under the rule obtaining in such cases we are unable to review the questions of fact presented by the petition for certiorari. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. We may add that the record of the Court of Appeals has been read, and we find in it nothing .to cause regret that the rule of this court in the matter of review by certiorari is as it is.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.  