
    9351.
    Raskin v. The State.
    Decided December 19, 1917.
    Description and counsel as in Broolcs v. State, ante, 510.
   Broyles, P. J.

No error of law is complained of. The evidence fulfy authorized the finding of the trial judge, exercising by consent the function's of both judge and jury. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.  