
    - vs. May.
    
   TIER Curiam

This action is founded upou a deed acknowledge log that defendant owed a debt, and in consideration thereof, conveying lands to the creditor who is authorised to sell for his satisfaction. There is no covenant for payment of the money, and the point reserved is, whether a covenant to pay the money can be implied from any part of the deed.

X ara of opinion the acknowledgment of the deed is not enough to raise such an implication upon, for the same deed also shews it satisfied. Vide 1 P. W. 291.  