
    468 A.2d 1117
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Dennis E. FISHER, Appellant.
    Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
    Submitted Sept. 9, 1983.
    Filed Dec. 9, 1983.
    Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied March 26, 1984.
    
      Michael R. Kostelansky, Wilkes-Barre, for appellant.
    Joseph Giebus, Assistant District Attorney, Wilkes-Barre, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    Before SPAETH, President Judge, and CAVANAUGH and HOFFMAN, JJ.
   SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for criminal trespass. We quash the appeal as filed too late.

Whether an appeal has been filed in time is a jurisdictional question that may be raised by this court sua sponte. Commonwealth v. Jones, 307 Pa.Super. 558, 453 A.2d 1028 (1982). The notice of an appeal “shall be filed within 30 days after the entry of the order from which the appeal is taken.” Pa.R.A.P. 903(a). The date of the entry of the order in a case such as this is the day the court imposes sentence on the defendant, informs him of his right to appeal within 30 days, and enters the judgment on the docket. Commonwealth v. Gottshalk, 276 Pa.Super. 102, 419 A.2d 115 (1980); Commonwealth v. Dorman, 272 Pa. Super. 149, 414 A.2d 713 (1979).

The record discloses that on December 16, 1980, appellant was sentenced and informed of his right to appeal “within 30 days from today.” N.T. 12/16/80 at 7. Appellant was also informed of his right to have counsel appointed to represent him in exercising this right. Id. Although, as transmitted to us, the record contains no docket entries, it does contain the original judgment of sentence, dated “12-16-80” and signed by the sentencing judge.

The notice of appeal to this court was filed on January 21, 1981. Except in circumstances not of record here we cannot enlarge the time for taking an appeal. Pa.R.A.P. 105(b) and note thereto; Commonwealth v. Gottshalk, supra, 276 Pa.Superior Ct. at 105, 419 A.2d at 117.

The appeal is quashed. 
      
      . Defendant filed the notice of appeal pro se. This does not alter the result. See Commonwealth v. Gottshalk, supra, 276 Pa.Superior Ct. at 105 n. 4, 419 A.2d at 117 n. 4.
     