
    State, Plaintiff in error, vs. Barrett, Defendant in error.
    
      April 6
    
    June 18, 1928.
    
    For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by the Attorney ' General, J. E. Messerschmidt, assistant attorney general, and Van R. Coppernoll, district attorney of Richland county, and oral argument by Mr. Messerschmidt and Mr. .Copper-noll.
    
    No appearance for the defendant in error.
   Owen, J.

The question presented upon this writ of error is identical with that in the case of State v. Ripley, decided herewith (ante, p. 288, 220 N. W. 235), and upon the authority of that case the order and judgment under review must be i affirmed.

By the Court. — So ordered.  