
    Walter Tanis, petitioner-respondent, v. Magdalene Tanis, defendant-appellant.
    [Decided January 23d, 1933.]
    
      
      Mr. Edward A. Murphy, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Elliot Chapman, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Moore.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.  