
    KETCHAM, Respondent, v. STEWART et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 27, 1912.)
    Action by Charles Ketcham against James Stewart and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the defendants, having objected to the evidence as to the cost of repairs and having obtained a ruling in their own favor, cannot be heard to insist upon a reversal because the like evidence when offered by them was excluded.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that the evidence of the reasonable cost of repairs to the boat was improperly excluded.  