
    Daniel Neal McINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-46.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 14, 1988.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1989.
    David T. Weisbrod, Tampa, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Candance M. Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   HALL, Judge.

We have examined the record and determine that the trial judge intended to depart from the guidelines sentence on the basis of the appellant’s repeated violations of probation and community control and that this is a valid reason justifying the departure. See Burton v. State, 513 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.  