
    [Decided June 28, 1894]
    HARTMAN v. BOLLES.
    Appeal from Umatilla: Morton D. Clipeord, Judge.
    Action by J. L. Hartman against J. T. Bolles to recover damages for the conversion by defendant of a stock of hardware. On a trial before a jury there was a verdict for defendant, hence this appeal.
    Aeeirmed.
    No appearance for Appellant.
    
      Mr. Thos. II. Crawford, for Respondent.
   Per Curiam.

There being no appearance or brief filed in behalf of the appellant in this court, the judgment in this case is affirmed without looking into the record.

Aeeirmed.  