
    BONDS — INJUNCTION
    [Hamilton (1st) Court of Appeals,
    April 3, 1916.]
    Jones, Jones and Gorman, JJ.
    
      State ex rel Campbell, v. Fred E. Wesselmann et al.
    Issue of Bonds for Insane Hospital Approved by Electorate not Enjoin-able.
    Injunction does not lie against an issue of bonds, put forth by county commissioners for improvements in an insane asylum owned by tbe county, when the issue has been approved by the people and the proceeds are disbursed in accordance with the statutory provisions.
    
      Campbell, Eiekenlooper, Hcmck & Capelle, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Herman P. Goebel, for defendant in error.
    
      
       Affirming, State v. Wesselmann, 30 Dec. 455 (18 N. S. 564.)
    
   BY THE COURT.

The commissioners of Hamilton county have the • authority to provide for the issue of bonds for the construction, enlargement and repair of buildings for Longview Hospital under Section 2434, General Code, after first submitting the question of such issue to the voters of the county and receiving their approval in compliance with Section 5638, et seq., General Code.

The proceedings for the issue of bonds in the sum of $300,-000 for such purpose, which ai’e attacked in this action, are regular and valid, and fully comply with all the requirements of the law.

So much of the proceeds of these bonds as are issued for the purpose of constructing new buildings can only be disbursed and expended by a building commission to be constituted and controlled under the provisions of Sections 2333 to 2342 inclusive, General Code; and the'amount used for the repair of existing buildings must be disbursed and expended by the board of directors of Longview Hospital,

The judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed.

Jones (E. H.), Jones (O. B.) and Gorman, JJ., concur.  