
    Betty THACKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-55182.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 16, 2009.
    
    Filed July 7, 2009.
    Brent Dorian Brehm, Kantor & Kantor, LLP, Northridge, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Katherine S. Ritchey, San Francisco, CA, Jones Day, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Standard Insurance Company appeals from the district court’s order dismissing the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that the parties are not diverse. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Co-Efficient Energy Sys. v. CSL Indus., Inc., 812 F.2d 556, 557 (9th Cir.1987). We vacate and remand.

The district court concluded that there is no diversity jurisdiction because Standard Insurance Company’s principal place of business is in California. In light of our subsequent decision in Davis v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., 557 F.3d 1026, 1029-30 (9th Cir.2009), we vacate the order dismissing the action, and remand this matter to the district court for further consideration.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant's request for oral argument is denied.
     