
    (C.D. 3366)
    Regalia Furs, Inc., et al v. United States
    United States Customs Court, Second Division
    
      (Decided March 19, 1968)
    
      Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiffs.
    
      Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
    Before Rao, Ford, and Beckworth, Judges
   Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise covered by the protests listed in the schedule, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, consists of imported wool sweaters which were classified as women’s, girls’, or infants’ lace or net wearing apparel, whether or not ornamented, and other wearing apparel, ornamented, and assessed with duty at the rate of 42.5 per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of item 382.03 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States.

It is claimed in said protests that said merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 25.5 per centum ad valorem as articles, not specially provided for, of beads, of bugles, of spangles, of imitation gemstones or of any combination thereof, pursuant to the provisions of item 741.50 of said tariff schedules.

These protests have been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation of counsel for the respective parties hereto which reads as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:
That the items marked “A”, and checked JW (Import Spec’s Initials) by Import Specialist J. Wargo (Import Spec’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protests enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof, and assessed with duty at 42% per centum ad valorem under the provisions of item 382.03, TSUS, consist of wool sweaters, fully covered with beads, bugles, or spangles.
That said sweaters are, in fact, in chief value of beads, bugles, or spangles, and that the wool fabric is not visible in significant part after the beads, bugles or spangles are applied to the sweater.
It is claimed that said merchandise is properly dutiable at 25% per centum ad valorem under the provisions of item 741.50, TSUS, as articles, not specially provided for, of beads, of bugles, of spangles, or any combination thereof.
That the protests be deemed submitted on this stipulation, the protests being limited to the items marked with the letter “A”, as aforesaid, and abandoned as to all other items.

Upon the agreed facts, we hold the merchandise here in question, identified by invoice items marked and checked as aforesaid, to be dutiable at the rate of 25.5 per centum ad valorem as articles, not specially provided for, of beads, of bugles, of spangles, of imitation gemstones or of any combination thereof, under item 741.50, TSUS. The claim in the protests to that effect is sustained. All other claims are, however, dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.  