
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharu BEY, a/k/a Jeffrey Lewis, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-7008
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 17, 2016
    Decided: November 22, 2016
    Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey appeals the district court’s text order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bey, No. 3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED  