
    DeMAEGHT v. GUSTAFSON.
    Appeal and Error — Negligence—Contributory Negligence — Trial ■ Court Finding.
    Finding of trial judge in negligence ease arising out of intersection collision that both plaintiff and defendant were guilty of negligence held, supported by record and not clearly erroneous.
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 839.
    Appeal from Macomb; Cynar (Walter P.), J.
    Submitted Division 2 June 4, 1968, at Lansing*.
    (Docket No. 3,510.)
    Decided June 24, 1968.
    Complaint by Jules DeMaeght and Martha De-Mae'ght against Eino Gustafson and Arthur William Boyden, III, for damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision at an intersection. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Mary Jane Liddy and John G. Cross, for plaintiffs.
    
      Becher, Mitchell, Phillips, Zanglin & Vann, for defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found as a matter of fact both plaintiff and defendant guilty of neglig*ence. Upon appeal the plaintiff raises the basic issue of the sufficiency of evidence. A review of the record supports the finding of fact by the trial judge. The finding not being clearly erroneous, we affirm.

Costs to appellees.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.  