
    Eliahu Lipkis v Mario Pikus et al.
   — Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, granted on the . basis of the following certified question: “Was the order of this court, which reversed the order of the Supreme Court, properly made?” Motion, insofar as it seeks a stay, denied as unnecessary. (See CPLR 5519, subd [e], par [i].) The order of this court entered on September 20, 1984 (104 AD2d 546) is vacated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Silverman, Fein and Kassal, JJ.  