
    No. 44693.
    Protests 3171—K, etc., of E. Leitz, Inc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise was held dutiable as photographic cameras or parts at 20 percent under paragraph 1551. Abstract 7038, United States v. Leitz (24 C. C. P. A. 139, T. D. 48622) and United States v. Ziess (id. 145, T. D. 48624) followed.  