
    Samuel JONES, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.
    No. 04-1961.
    United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
    Jan. 31, 2005.
    Samuel Jones on brief pro se.
    Jay S. Koplove on brief for appellee, Boston Housing Authority.
    Before SELYA, LYNCH and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

After allowing this pro se appellant to proceed in forma pauperis and giving him an opportunity to be heard, the district court dismissed the complaint, which sought to reopen a different litigation. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (allowing district court to dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint faffing to state a claim “at any time”). After careful review of the record and appellate briefs, we affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the court in its orders dated November 28, 2003 and June 18, 2004.

Affirmed.  