
    PLEASANTS vs. ROSS.
    
    Person, entrusted with goods, no witness against the cletainer.
    
      
       This, and the following case, were omitted in their proper places.
    
   The petition stated that the defendant, as sheriff levied an attachment against the goods of one Davis, on certain good of the plaintiff. To prove the propertym Davis was offered as a witness, the goods having been entrusted to him, to bring them to New-Orleans andsell them on commission, and left by him in the store of the person in whose hands they were attached-but the Court (Martin, J. alone) rejected his testimony.  